DOCSLIB.ORG

Week #1 – Making the Most of High Cards

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Week #1 – Making the Most of High Cards 914-949-5853 313 South Central Ave, [email protected] Scarsdale, NY 10583 Handling Bad Breaks In bridge, we hope for the best but plan for the worst. When playing a hand, this means that we hope that suits break as favorably as possible but we take all necessary precautions in case they do not. Take this suit combination: Dummy : A J 6 3 2 You : K 8 7 5 4 We have 10 trumps. There are only three cards. They usually they split 2-1.If they split 2-1, it does not matter in what order we play the cards. We can cash the A first or the K first. It doesn’t matter, because, after we play the A and K, the opponents will be out of trumps. But, what if they break 3-0. If they break 3-0 so that the QT9 are behind the AJ632, there is nothing we can do. If we play the A and lead the J, they will cover with the Q and forcing us to play our K and it will be there T that is good. However, if the QT9 is in front of the AJ632, then we can handle the situation. We can cash the K first. If our RHO shows out. We can know lead the 4 to the J and finesse the Q. When you have winners in both hands, it may make a difference in which order you cash those winners, especially if you hold a tenace in one or both hands. A tenace is a combination of a high card and a lower card where the opponents hold the card(s) in-between. In the example above, the AJ is the tenace. Where you have a tenace, best technique is to cash your winners opposite the tenace first. If it is not clear whether you have a tenace, examine your holding and work out which card is nearest to being a winner. In the above example, the ace and king are winners and the card closest to being a winner is the jack. The A-J combination is the tenace. Therefore, cash the king first. North West AJ632 East QT9 - South K8754 Likewise: North West KT73 East J985 2 South AQ64 If up do get a bad break, the first thing to do is take a deep breath and don’t panic. Often times you can handle the bad break, it just takes readjusting your plan handle the situation. Stop and identify how many tricks you must lose and then make sure you hold it to the minimum number. To do this, you may need to stop drawing trumps, or draw all but one, or run a side suit until they are forced to trump. No matter what the plan, make sure that you keep your wits about you and stay in control. A Trump Coup A trump coup is a means of drawing an opponent’s trumps when those trumps are finessable except for the fact that declarer does not have trumps in either dummy or his hand necessary to take the finesse. So he must arrange the play such that the defender will be forced to trump in front of the tenace, and thereby effect the finesse. Declarer won ♣ Q lead with ♣ K, and cashed ♠ AK. Crestfallen to see North Deals ♠ 6 the 4-1 split seemingly wreck his good grand slam, he could not see a None Vul ♥ A 8 5 3 2 way to avoid losing to East’s ♠ J. He cashed ♠ Q and conceded to Contract 7S ♦ K J 5 East’s ♠ J. Down one. What should have happened Because he has ♣ A 7 6 2 no more trumps in dummy with which to lead through East, he needs a Trump Coup. This involves reducing his trump length to the same as ♠ 4 N ♠ J 9 8 7 ♥ K J 9 4 ♥ Q 10 6 East. Three ruffs are required. After winning ♣ K and cashing ♠ AK, W E ♦ 10 8 6 4 ♦ 9 7 2 you cross to ♥ A and ruff a heart. Cash ♦ A, cross to ♦ J and ruff a S third heart. Cross to ♦ K and ruff a fourth heart. Finally cross to ♣ A ♣ Q J 10 9 ♣ 8 4 3 and lead either card. You have ♠ Q10 sitting over East’s ♠ J9, and his ♠ A K Q 10 5 3 2 trumps are “couped”. 13 tricks and grand slam made. If you ♥ 7 remember one thing... When dummy has no trumps left to finesse ♦ A Q 3 against an opposing honor, you can use Trump Coup technique. ♣ K 5 Condition: you must have the same trump length. 2/1 Bidding Course 7 Thursdays 11/1 – 12/20 no class on Thanksgiving (9:45-11:30) cost $30 per class or $15 with pass Two Over One Game Forcing (2/1 GF) is a version of the Standard American bidding system that allows the partnership to create a game forcing auction at the two level. The partnership gains a big advantage from being game-forced at such a low level, because the partnership can now take its time and use all of the available space to find the best place to play game and to explore for slam. Gaining this huge advantage only takes a minor adjustment in the point ranges currently used in Standard American, including needing 13 points to bid your own suit at the two level in response to partner’s opening bid and bidding 1NT in response to partner’s major suit opening with 6-12 points. This course will discuss in more depth these minor adjustments as well as how to take advantage of the space provided by the game forcing auctions. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MILITARY BRIDGE DIRECTIONS Bridge Knowledge Not Required – Only a Desire to Have Fun!
    MILITARY BRIDGE DIRECTIONS Bridge Knowledge not required – only a desire to have fun! The game is played using the following equipment: 1. Set of Flags – 1 large fort flag and a small flag for each team. 2. Schedule Sheet – names trump for each round and shows where respective “Scouts” are to go. 3. A deck of cards for each table. Definitions: Trick: Each play is called a trick. There are 13 tricks in each game. The first to win 7 tricks wins that game. Trump: The card suit designated on the Schedule Sheet that leads each trick (hearts, diamonds, clubs, spades or no-trump). Each table has one Captain who is player #1 and three Scouts, players #2, 3 & 4. These can be selected or cut for (the highest card is your team’s Captain). Captains retain their seats during the entire 10 games, sending out their Scouts as per the Schedule Sheet to “capture” other Nations’ flags. The Scout designated to stay and play with the Captain sits opposite the Captain and they play against the Visitor Scouts at your table. The Captain always deals, announces the trump suit (from the Schedule Sheet), and makes the first lead. In Military Bridge, there is no Dummy Hand and no bidding. Trump is indicated on your Schedule Sheet. The play is similar to bridge, except that all players participate. The captain leads, and then each player (in clockwise order) plays a card. If playing a “no trump” hand, the highest card in the suit led wins the trick. With trump you may trump suit led only if you have none of that suit in your hand, then highest trump card played wins the trick.
    [Show full text]
  • USA Recapture Mcconnell Cup
    Co-ordinator: Jean-Paul Meyer (France) Issue: 12 Chief Editor: Mark Horton (England) Editors: Brent Manley (USA), Brian Senior (England) Layout Editor: George Hatzidakis (Greece) Photographer: Ron Tacchi (England) 28th August 2002 USA recapture McConnell Cup ATTENTION!!! All events begin at 10.00 Open and Women's Pairs 152 pairs play in the Open Pairs Semi-final. Approxi- mately 66 of these will qualify for the final, where about six more pairs are expected to drop in from the Rosenblum semi-finals and final to make a 72-pair final. An American team won the inaugural McConnell Cup 52 pairs play in the Women's Pairs Semi-final.We ex- contest in Albuquerque in 1994 and now eight years pect 21 to qualify for the final, with another 11 pairs later the trophy returns to its native soil.The all Amer- joining them from the McConnell semi-finals and final ican final saw Irina Levitina, Kerri Sanborn, Lynn Deas, to make a field of 32 pairs for the final. Beth Palmer, Randi Montin and Jill Meyers (pictured Both finals will be played over five sessions commenc- above) comfortably outscore Judi Radin, Shawn Quinn, ing on Thursday morning at 10.00 a.m. Mildred Breed, Rozanne Pollack, Hjordis Eythorsdottir and Valerie Westheimer. Seniors Pairs In the Power Rosenblum, after two scintillating semi fi- There are 72 pairs playing in the Seniors Pairs Qualify- nals, Lavazza meet Munawar in today's final. ing stage, of which 28 will go through to the final.This is a three-session event that starts at 10.00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\My Documents\Adobe\Boston Fall99
    Presents They Had Their Beans Baked In Beantown Appeals at the 1999 Fall NABC Edited by Rich Colker ACBL Appeals Administrator Assistant Editor Linda Trent ACBL Appeals Manager CONTENTS Foreword ...................................................... iii The Expert Panel.................................................v Cases from San Antonio Tempo (Cases 1-24)...........................................1 Unauthorized Information (Cases 25-35)..........................93 Misinformation (Cases 35-49) .................................125 Claims (Cases 50-52)........................................177 Other (Case 53-56)..........................................187 Closing Remarks From the Expert Panelists..........................199 Closing Remarks From the Editor..................................203 Special Section: The WBF Code of Practice (for Appeals Committees) ....209 The Panel’s Director and Committee Ratings .........................215 NABC Appeals Committee .......................................216 Abbreviations used in this casebook: AI Authorized Information AWMPP Appeal Without Merit Penalty Point LA Logical Alternative MI Misinformation PP Procedural Penalty UI Unauthorized Information i ii FOREWORD We continue with our presentation of appeals from NABC tournaments. As always, our goal is to provide information and to foster change for the better in a manner that is entertaining, instructive and stimulating. The ACBL Board of Directors is testing a new appeals process at NABCs in 1999 and 2000 in which a Committee (called a Panel) comprised of pre-selected top Directors will hear appeals at NABCs from non-NABC+ events (including side games, regional events and restricted NABC events). Appeals from NABC+ events will continue to be heard by the National Appeals Committees (NAC). We will review both types of cases as we always have traditional Committee cases. Panelists were sent all cases and invited to comment on and rate each Director ruling and Panel/Committee decision. Not every panelist will comment on every case.
    [Show full text]
  • February 24, 2017 President Donald J. Trump the White House United States of America
    February 24, 2017 President Donald J. Trump The White House United States of America Dear President Trump, Since the founding of this country, science has been fundamental to the advancement of sound policy and economic prosperity and innovation. Science improves the lives of Americans, stimulates our economy, advances our understanding of our world, and protects us and our families from harm. As you select advisors that will help you to draft a blueprint for American policy, we urge you to make appointing a Science Advisor an immediate priority. Science is in the DNA of the United States. It plays an integral part in our nation's security, economic growth, public health, and infrastructure. Appointing a Science Advisor quickly will enable the Administration to maximize investments in science and develop a strategic plan that secures America’s leadership in science. The Science Advisor will assist your administration in driving innovation, and provide scientifically sound solutions to the pressing issues facing our nation today; including updating deteriorating infrastructure, combatting health epidemics, providing clean air and water, and securing valuable natural resources and minerals. Appointing a Science Advisor is a smart investment for our nation and for keeping our position as a scientific leader globally. Due to the integral role of the Science Advisor, we urge you to appoint an individual with a strong scientific background who understands the rigorous scientific method, the need for evidence-based science, and who can leverage the collaborative nature of the scientific community and the value of scientific research in shaping America’s future. As supporters of science, we urge you to work with our scientific organizations as you commence the selection process and the important task of advancing America’s scientific enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Bridge Terms
    GLOSSARY OF BRIDGE TERMS Alert When your partner makes a conventional bid you must alert this to the opponents by knocking the table (or displaying the ‘Alert’ card if using bidding boxes). Auction Another term for the bidding. Avoidance An attempt to prevent a particular defender from regaining the lead. Balanced A hand containing no void, no singleton and not more than one Hand doubleton. Barrier When planning your opener's rebid, imagine a ‘barrier’ just above your first suit at the next level up. A new suit rebid below the barrier shows 12-15 points (occasionally 16 or 17 points after a 1 level response when opener doesn’t have enough for a jump shift). A new suit rebid above the barrier that isn’t a jump shift shows 16-19 points (also known as a reverse). Blocked A suit is blocked if there is a high card in the short hand that prevents the suit from being cashed. A player will often aim to unblock the suit. Break The way in which the defenders’ cards in a particular suit are divided between their two hands. For example, a 4-2 break indicates that with 6 cards in a suit missing, one defender has 4 cards of the suit and his partner has 2 cards. Also referred to as split. Cash Playing a card that is certain to win the trick. This card is known as a master. Clear a suit Knocking out the opponents’ last stopper in a suit, after which it will be possible to cash one’s tricks in the suit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law Wins
    THE LAW WINS A Brief Look at the Law of Total Tricks* Most of you have heard about the Law of Total Tricks. The following is an attempt to explain it. Whether or not you have heard it discussed, it is applied by experts and the better bridge players frequently and with great success. Simply, the Law of Total Tricks says that the total number of tricks available on a bridge deal in a competitive auction is equal to the total number of trumps. The total number of tricks means the combined total tricks available to both sides if each were to play a contract in their longest and best trump fit assuming best play and defense. The total number of trumps means the combined total of trumps and is reached by adding together the number of trumps from each side's best trump suit. Sound a little difficult? It really isn=t....it=s just a little difficult to put it into an easily understood paragraph! I suggest that read and reread the above until you think you understand it. Now why, you might ask, do you care? The Law of Total Tricks is a tool to be used in competitive bidding situations. The law infers that the total trick count is constant and that neither the location of high cards nor the distribution of the suits changes it. With proper application of the Law, better decisions can be made on whether to bid more or to defend. Look at the following hand to see how the Law of Total Tricks works: North Í KJ6 Ì AQ102 Ë QJ10 Ê K98 West East Í 1043 Í AQ52 Ì 953 Ì K4 Ë 932 Ë K84 Ê AQ107 Ê J654 South Í 987 Ì J876 Ë A765 Ê 32 In this example North-South's best fit is hearts (8) and East-West's best fit is clubs (8).
    [Show full text]
  • Beginner's Bridge Notes
    z x w y BEGINNER’S BRIDGE NOTES z x w y Leigh Harding PLAYING THE CARDS IN TRUMP CONTRACTS INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGE Bridge is a game for four people playing in two partnerships. A standard pack of 52 cards is used. There are four Suits: z Spades, y Hearts, x Don’t play a single card until you have planned how you will make your Diamonds and w Clubs. Each suit has thirteen cards in the order: contract! A,K,Q,J,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2. Ace is high. The plan will influence decisions you will have to make during the play, THE PLAY for example knowing when to delay drawing trumps, instead of drawing them all at the beginning. The cards are dealt so that each player receives 13 cards. It is best to arrange them in your hand with alternating red suits and black suits. The bidding starts with the dealer. After the bidding is over, one pair STEP 1. Know how many tricks you need to make your contract! become the declaring side. One member of this pair called the Declarer, plays the hand while the opponents Defend the hand. STEP 2. Estimate how many tricks in trump suit (assume most likely split). The partner of the declarer, called the Dummy, puts all of his cards face STEP 3. Count certain tricks in the other three suits. up on the table and takes no further part in the play. Declarer plays both hands, his own and dummy’s. The first person to play a card is the STEP 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Encyclopedia-Of-Cardplay-Techniques-Guy-Levé.Pdf
    © 2007 Guy Levé. All rights reserved. It is illegal to reproduce any portion of this mate- rial, except by special arrangement with the publisher. Reproduction of this material without authorization, by any duplication process whatsoever, is a violation of copyright. Master Point Press 331 Douglas Ave. Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5M 1H2 (416) 781-0351 Website: http://www.masterpointpress.com http://www.masteringbridge.com http://www.ebooksbridge.com http://www.bridgeblogging.com Email: [email protected] Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Levé, Guy The encyclopedia of card play techniques at bridge / Guy Levé. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-1-55494-141-4 1. Contract bridge--Encyclopedias. I. Title. GV1282.22.L49 2007 795.41'5303 C2007-901628-6 Editor Ray Lee Interior format and copy editing Suzanne Hocking Cover and interior design Olena S. Sullivan/New Mediatrix Printed in Canada by Webcom Ltd. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 10 09 08 07 Preface Guy Levé, an experienced player from Montpellier in southern France, has a passion for bridge, particularly for the play of the cards. For many years he has been planning to assemble an in-depth study of all known card play techniques and their classification. The only thing he lacked was time for the project; now, having recently retired, he has accom- plished his ambitious task. It has been my privilege to follow its progress and watch the book take shape. A book such as this should not to be put into a beginner’s hands, but it should become a well-thumbed reference source for all players who want to improve their game.
    [Show full text]
  • Abandoned Science, Broken Promises How the Trump Administration’S Neglect of Science Is Leaving Marginalized Communities Further Behind
    Abandoned Science, Broken Promises How the Trump Administration’s Neglect of Science Is Leaving Marginalized Communities Further Behind {c S CenteD rfor {c S CenteD rfor Science and Democracy Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists at the Union of Concerned Scientists Abandoned Science, Broken Promises How the Trump Administration’s Neglect of Science Is Leaving Marginalized Communities Further Behind Anita Desikan Jacob Carter Shea Kinser Gretchen Goldman October 2019 {c S CenteD rfor {c S CenteD rfor Science and Democracy Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists at the Union of Concerned Scientists © 2019 Union of Concerned Scientists All Rights Reserved Anita Desikan is a research analyst in the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists. Jacob Carter is a research scientist in the Center. Shea Kinser is the program assistant in the Center. Gretchen Goldman is the research director in the Center. The Union of Concerned Scientists puts rigorous, independent science to work to solve our planet’s most pressing problems. Joining with people across the country, we combine technical analysis and effective advocacy to create innovative, practical solutions for a healthy, safe, and sustainable future. The Center for Science and Democracy at UCS works to strengthen American democracy by advancing the essential role of science, evidence-based decision making, and constructive debate as a means to improve the health, security, and prosperity of all people. More information about UCS is available on the UCS website: www.ucsusa.org This report is available online (in PDF format) at www.ucsusa.org /resources/ abandoned-science-broken-promises Designed by: Bradie Bradshaw, Houston, TX www.bradiebradshaw.studio Cover photo: AP Photo/David Goldman Children play basketball in Port Arthur, Texas, a predominantly Black community that is also the site of three different oil refineries.
    [Show full text]
  • TRUMP V. MAZARS USA, LLP
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2019 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus TRUMP ET AL. v. MAZARS USA, LLP, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 19–715. Argued May 12, 2020—Decided July 9, 2020* In April 2019, three committees of the U. S. House of Representatives issued four subpoenas seeking information about the finances of Pres- ident Donald J. Trump, his children, and affiliated businesses. The House Committee on Financial Services issued a subpoena to Deutsche Bank seeking any document related to account activity, due diligence, foreign transactions, business statements, debt schedules, statements of net worth, tax returns, and suspicious activity identified by Deutsche Bank. It issued a second subpoena to Capital One for similar information. The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence issued a subpoena to Deutsche Bank that mirrored the subpoena issued by the Financial Services Committee. And the House Committee on Oversight and Reform issued a subpoena to the President’s personal accounting firm, Mazars USA, LLP, demanding information related to the President and several affiliated businesses. Although each of the committees sought overlapping sets of financial documents, each sup- plied different justifications for the requests, explaining that the infor- mation would help guide legislative reform in areas ranging from money laundering and terrorism to foreign involvement in U.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Magee's Acol Bidding Quiz
    Number: 165 UK £3.95 Europe €5.00 September 2016 Bernard Magee’s Acol Bidding Quiz This month we are dealing with all sorts of conventions. You are West in the auctions below, BRIDGEplaying ‘Standard Acol’ with a weak no-trump (12-14 points) and four-card majors. 1. Dealer South. Love All. 4. Dealer East. N/S Game. 7. Dealer East. Love All. 10. Dealer North. Love All. ♠ K Q 3 ♠ A 6 ♠ A Q 4 3 ♠ 6 2 ♥ K 4 3 2 N ♥ J 9 7 6 N ♥ 7 6 ♥ Q 2 N W E W E N W E ♦ K 7 6 ♦ A 9 8 3 2 ♦ Q J 10 8 ♦ A 8 7 3 S S W E S ♣ Q J 2 ♣ 6 5 ♣ J 8 2 ♣ A 9 8 5 4 S West North East South West North East South West North East South West North East South 2♠1 1NT 2♣1 1♥ 2♥1 1♣1 Dbl 1♠ ? 1Weak two ? ? ? 1May have just one club 1Hearts and another suit (5-4+) 1Michaels cue bid: 5-5 in ♠ & ♣ or ♦ (five-card majors and a strong 1NT) 2. Dealer North. E/W Game. 5. Dealer West. Love All. 8. Dealer West. Love All. 11. Dealer North. Love All. ♠ 7 ♠ A Q 7 6 ♠ A K 7 5 ♠ A 7 6 3 N ♥ Q 8 7 6 N ♥ 3 2 N ♥ K Q 7 6 5 ♥ 6 5 4 N W E ♦ W E ♦ W E ♦ ♦ W E A 9 8 5 3 J 4 3 J 8 7 S 9 8 S S S ♣ K 9 6 ♣ A Q 10 3 ♣ 2 ♣ K Q J 10 West North East South West North East South West North East South West North East South 2♠1 Pass Pass 1NT Pass Pass 2♣1 1♥ 2NT1 Dbl Pass 1♣1 Dbl 1♠ ? 1Weak two ? ? Pass 1NT Pass Pass 1Hearts and another suit (5-4+) 1Unusual no-trump: 5-5 in ♣ & ♦ ? 1May have just one club (five-card majors and a strong 1NT) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden's Regulatory Changes
    President Biden has moved quickly to put his stamp on regulatory policy and practice. While his Inauguration Day actions acknowledge longstanding regulatory review practices, they also foreshadow a move away from the bipartisan emphasis on evidence-based policy and signal a much more progressive, and less humble, approach to regulating. President Biden signed several actions addressing regulations on his first evening in office: executive orders revoking several Trump regulatory process orders, and “Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis,” as well as a memorandum on “Modernizing Regulatory Review.” His chief of staff also issued a memorandum freezing regulations pending review. None of these was unexpected, though combined they signal a sea change in regulatory policy and process. Executive Order on Revocation of Certain Executive Orders Concerning Federal Regulation Presidents need not seek public comment or consent from other branches of government to issue executive orders, as long as the action is supported by a statutory delegation or the president’s own constitutional authority. Likewise, they can revoke orders with the stroke of a pen, and that’s what President Biden did with Trump’s regulatory process orders on Inauguration Day. Biden’s E.O. 13992 revokes “harmful policies and directives” that it finds hinder the federal government’s flexibility to confront challenges including “the pandemic, economic recovery, racial justice, and climate change.” Not surprisingly, it repeals E.O. 13771, which capped the costs of new regulations and required agencies to eliminate two regulations for every new one issued. It also removed several other Trump orders, two of which were less obviously inconsistent with the Biden agenda, and might have been useful to the incoming team.
    [Show full text]