Three Decades of Peace Education in the Philippines: Stories of Hope and Challenges Copyright © 2017 All Rights Reserved

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Three Decades of Peace Education in the Philippines: Stories of Hope and Challenges Copyright © 2017 All Rights Reserved INSIDE FRONT COVER BLANK PAGE Three Decades of Peace Education in the Philippines: Stories of Hope and Challenges Copyright © 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced without per- mission in writing from the publishers and the authors except by a reviewer or researcher who wishes to quote brief passages in connection with a review or research for inclusion in any other publication. Published by the Center for Peace Education, Miriam College, Katipunan Ave., Quezon City, Philippines, and the World Council for Curriculum and Instruction, Philippines Chapter. Printed by Cover & Pages Publishing, Inc., Manila, Philippines. ISBN: 978-971-0177-12-7 iv Three Decades of Peace Education in the Philippines: Stories of Hope and Challenges Editors: Toh Swee-Hin • Virginia Cawagas • Jasmin N. Galace Assistant Editor: Anna Kristina M. Dinglasan Publishers: Center for Peace Education, Miriam College & World Council for Curriculum and Instruction, Philippines Chapter v 6 Three Decades of Peace Education in the Philippines: Stories of Hope and Challenges CONTENTS Preface .........................................................................................................ix Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Section I: Visions Crystallized, Seeds Planted Journeying in Solidarity: Educating for a Culture of Peace from Mindanao to Manila and Beyond by Toh Swee-Hin ................... 15 Peace Education: Reflections of a Mindanao Educator by Ofelia L. Durante.................................................................................. 29 Three Decades of Peace Education – My Story by Loreta N. Castro ................................................................................... 39 Section II: Growing Seeds in the Education System Personal Insights on Institutionalizing Peace Education in Basic Education and Teacher Education by Emily T. Lambio .................................................................................. 47 Checkpoints and Chokepoints in Integrating Peace Education in Teacher Education in Davao Region by Venus Budoy-Betita ......... 53 Transforming the Head, the Heart, and the Hand of Preservice Teachers Towards Building a Culture of Peace by Arlan Dela Cruz .................................................................. 61 My Journey in Peace Education by Marco P. Gutang ......................... 69 Peace Building and Peace Education Story in the Ateneo de Zamboanga by Perla Arlene S. Ledesma, Babylyn V. Tubilla, and Espiridion Atilano Jr. ................................................................................ 75 Challenges and Hopes of Peace Education in Mindanao State University – Maguindanao by Soraya Q. Sinsuat ........................ 83 My Journey as a Peace Educator by Lorenzo I. Balili, Jr. .................... 87 Teaching Peace Education at the Ateneo Grade School by Helen U. Amante .......................................... 93 Twinning for Peace: Two Faiths, One Vision, The Miriam College– Rajah Muda High School Twinning Project by Melinda Lamorena ..... 99 The Journey of an Aspiring Peace Educator by Genevieve Balance Kupang ...................................................................107 vii7 CONTENTS Peace Education in Don Bosco School–Sta. Mesa and Mary Help of Christian School (Cebu), Inc. by Sr. Marita R. Cedeño ............123 Section III: Nurturing Peace Education: Civil Society Cultivators No Matter How the River Bends, Be in the Mainstream: Hosting Conversations that Matter by Josephine P. Perez ....................133 Breaking the Cycle of Hate ... Out of the Box Options by Chito Generoso ..........................................147 Interfaith Dialogue Beyond Tolerance by Maria Teresa Guingona-Africa ..............................................................155 Silsilah Towards “Radical Love for Radical Change” by Fr. Sebastiano D’Ambra, PIME ..........................................................161 The Museo Pambata Peace Initiatives by Nina Lim-Yuson ................171 A Stitch in the Tapestry of Peacebuilding in Mindanao by Amabella “Mabel” Carumba.........................................179 Peace Starts from the Heart of a Child by Rohanisa Sumndad-Usman ...................................................................193 Connect, Empower, and Transform: A Decade of Peace- building and Youth Peace Advocacy by Beverly A. Orozco .................201 Pax Christi-Miriam College: Making a Difference, Changing Lives by Pax Christi–Miriam College ....................................209 APNIEVE: Developing a Culture of Peace in the Hearts of Learners and Educators by Lourder R Quisumbing .........................217 Peace Education Journey with the World Council for Curriculum and Instruction by Teresita Paed-Pedrajas .........................221 Section IV: Moving Ahead, Widening the Circle Peace Education: Measuring Impact by Jasmin Nario-Galace.............235 Of Dreamers, Sowers, Teachers, and Healers by Virginia Cawagas ...................................................................................245 Appendices Appendix 1: Forum Program .................................................................257 Appendix 2: Forum Participants ...........................................................263 viii PREFACE hree decades ago, in February 1986, the historic and inspirational people-power revolution in the Philippines ended an era of dictato- Trial and repressive rule. For the Filipino people, it also ushered in an opportunity to rebuild a society based on principles and processes of democratic participation, human rights and social justice. At the grassroots, many civil society movements, NGOs and individuals expanded their work and advocacy in peacebuilding, while a new Constitution was proclaimed that enshrined fundamental freedoms and the foundations of a just and humane society. It was in this renewed democratic post-EDSA space that the field of peace education began to take root, initially within the Mindanao context where armed conflicts arising from movements for Moro self-determination and the CPP-NPA-NDF revolutionary struggle were still unresolved. Peace education programs also began to develop in schools, colleges and universities through nonformal and community programs in other islands and regions. Through the advocacy of the Peace Education Network (PEN), peace educa- tion centers and programs, nongovernment organizations and with support from the Office of the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process (OPAPP), one significant milestone was attained in 2006 with the signing of E.O. 570: Institutionalizing Peace Education in Basic Education and Teacher Education by then Philippine President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. Among educators seeking to build a culture of peace, there is a consensus that transformative processes of educating are both long-term and lifelong. After three decades since the organized emergence of peace education in the Philippines, it was timely to engage in a retrospective clarification of the state of the field. On June 27 and 28, 2016, more than 50 educators from diverse formal institutions, NGOs and other civil society organizations gathered at Miriam College to share stories of hope and challenges of their initial and continuing efforts to promote peace education. Co-organized by the Center for Peace Education of Miriam College and the UN-mandated ix PREFACE University for Peace in Costa Rica, the Forum was envisioned as a space to be inspired by, as well as to learn lessons from initiatives and programs in Philippine peace education. It was a meaningful and fruitful gathering of educators in all levels and forms of education from formal basic and higher institutions to non-formal and community programs. While almost all of the participants are Filipinos by nationality, there were also a few whose roots were in other societies but who have been deeply involved in the Philippines journey in peace educa- tion. Regrettably, it was not feasible for all individuals or institutions who have played a significant role and continue to contribute to peace education to directly participate in the Forum, such as Notre Dame University, Balay Mindanaw Foundation, the Schools for Peace initiative, the Mindanao Peace- building Institute and several others. However, within the stories presented, their role were often duly noted although the Forum cannot claim to provide a comprehensive narrative. During the Forum, there were joyful reunions of many educators who collaborated in those early years of peace education formation and have remained committed to the vision, principles and goals that moved them to nurture the seedlings of which many have grown into successive generations of trees, flowers and fruits. Yet the stories did not only narrate hopeful signs of accomplishments and progress, they also understandably revealed some significant challenges and barriers that need to be constructively faced and overcome. The conference would not have been possible without the support, co- operation and help of numerous people and institutions. To the leaders and staff of Miriam College’s Center for Peace Education (CPE) including Dr. Loreta Castro, founding Director of CPE and former President of Miriam College, and Mirma Mae Tica, we express our gratitude for their energies and commitment in hosting the conference at relatively short notice. We thank Dr. Rosario Oreta Lapus, President of Miriam College, for her warm welcome to the delegates,
Recommended publications
  • The Catholic Church and the Reproductive Health Bill Debate: the Philippine Experience
    bs_bs_banner HeyJ LV (2014), pp. 1044–1055 THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND THE REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH BILL DEBATE: THE PHILIPPINE EXPERIENCE ERIC MARCELO O. GENILO, SJ Loyola School of Theology, Philippines The leadership of the Church in the Philippines has historically exercised a powerful influence on politics and social life. The country is at least 80% Catholic and there is a deeply ingrained cultural deference for clergy and religious. Previous attempts in the last 14 years to pass a reproductive health law have failed because of the opposition of Catholic bishops. Thus the recent passage of the ‘Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012’ (R.A. 10354) was viewed by some Filipinos as a stunning failure for the Church and a sign of its diminished influence on Philippine society. This article proposes that the Church’s engagement in the reproductive health bill (RH Bill) debate and the manner of its discourse undermined its own campaign to block the law.1 The first part of the article gives a historical overview of the Church’s opposition to government family planning programs. The second part discusses key points of conflict in the RH Bill debate. The third part will examine factors that shaped the Church’s attitude and responses to the RH Bill. The fourth part will examine the effects of the debate on the Church’s unity, moral authority, and role in Philippine society. The fifth part will draw lessons for the Church and will explore paths that the Church community can take in response to the challenges arising from the law’s implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Relevance Delivering Value
    BUILDING RELEVANCE DELIVERING VALUE ANNUAL REPORT 2019 VISION To lead the business sector’s efforts to reduce poverty in the Philippines MISSION PBSP is committed to poverty reduction by promoting business sector leadership and commitment to programs that lead to self-reliance .................................. About PBSP Philippine Business for Social Progress is the largest business-led NGO at the forefront of strategic corporate citizenship and business sector leadership, contributing to sustainable development and poverty reduction. Established in 1970, PBSP remains a consultant and partner of choice of companies and donors. PBSP scales up impact by adopting the Collective Impact strategy to solve large, complex, and systemic problems. PBSP organizes Platforms for Collective Engagements (PlaCEs) to ensure alignment and sustainability of initiatives by multiple stakeholders. Responding to the changing landscape of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), PBSP’s brand of corporate citizenship taps into the core business competencies of companies and promotes inclusive business as a strategy. PBSP also continues to strategically engage companies through social investment, responsible business practices, and philanthropy. PBSP creates sustainable solutions to societal problems in its core program areas which are Health, Education, Environment, and Livelihood and Enterprise Development. It also provides off- the-shelf options for engagement of companies and their employees. With a proven track record, PBSP provides end- to-end services in
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT JULY 2011 -JULY 2012 Unit 601, DMG Center, 52 Domingo M
    BISHOPS-BUSINESSMEN’S CONFERENCE for Human Development ANNUAL REPORT JULY 2011 -JULY 2012 Unit 601, DMG Center, 52 Domingo M. Guevarra St. corner Calbayog Extension Mandaluyong City Tel Nos. 584-25-01; Tel/Fax 470-41-51 E-mail: [email protected] Website: bbc.org.ph TABLE OF CONTENTS BISHOPS-BUSINESSMEN’S CONFERENCE MESSAGE OF NATIONAL CO-CHAIRMEN.....................................................1-2 FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ELECTION RESULTS............................ 3-4 STRATEGIC PLANNING OF THE EXCOM - OUTPUTS.....................................5-6 NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITEE REPORT.................................................7-10 NATIONAL SECRETARIAT National Greening Program.................................................................8-10 Consultation Meeting with the CBCP Plenary Assembly........................10-13 CARDINAL SIN TRUST FUND FOR BUSINESS DISCIPLESHIP.......................23-24 CLUSTER/COMMITTEE REPORTS Formation of BBC Chapters..........................................................................13 Mary Belle S. Beluan Cluster on Labor & Employment................................................................23-24 Executive Director/Editor Committee on Social Justice & Agrarian Reform.....................................31-37 Coalition Against Corruption -BBC -LAIKO Government Procurement Monitoring Project.......................................................................................38-45 Replication of Government Procurement Monitoring............................46-52
    [Show full text]
  • Between Rhetoric and Reality: the Progress of Reforms Under the Benigno S. Aquino Administration
    Acknowledgement I would like to extend my deepest gratitude, first, to the Institute of Developing Economies-JETRO, for having given me six months from September, 2011 to review, reflect and record my findings on the concern of the study. IDE-JETRO has been a most ideal site for this endeavor and I express my thanks for Executive Vice President Toyojiro Maruya and the Director of the International Exchange and Training Department, Mr. Hiroshi Sato. At IDE, I had many opportunities to exchange views as well as pleasantries with my counterpart, Takeshi Kawanaka. I thank Dr. Kawanaka for the constant support throughout the duration of my fellowship. My stay in IDE has also been facilitated by the continuous assistance of the “dynamic duo” of Takao Tsuneishi and Kenji Murasaki. The level of responsiveness of these two, from the days when we were corresponding before my arrival in Japan to the last days of my stay in IDE, is beyond compare. I have also had the opportunity to build friendships with IDE Researchers, from Nobuhiro Aizawa who I met in another part of the world two in 2009, to Izumi Chibana, one of three people that I could talk to in Filipino, the other two being Takeshi and IDE Researcher, Velle Atienza. Maraming salamat sa inyo! I have also enjoyed the company of a number of other IDE researchers within or beyond the confines of the Institute—Khoo Boo Teik, Kaoru Murakami, Hiroshi Kuwamori, and Sanae Suzuki. I have been privilege to meet researchers from other disciplines or area studies, Masashi Nakamura, Kozo Kunimune, Tatsufumi Yamagata, Yasushi Hazama, Housan Darwisha, Shozo Sakata, Tomohiro Machikita, Kenmei Tsubota, Ryoichi Hisasue, Hitoshi Suzuki, Shinichi Shigetomi, and Tsuruyo Funatsu.
    [Show full text]
  • Far Eastern University Institute of Education
    Far Eastern University Institute of Education The Institute of Education (IE) is one of the four original institutes that comprised Far Eastern University in 1934. At first, the Institute’s concentration was in Home Economics, to emphasize the education of women as a driving force in the home. Hence, an integrated program and special courses in Clothing and Textiles, Cookery and Interior Decoration were among its curricular offerings. In 1946, the IE was granted Government Recognition for the elementary and high school teacher’s certificate. In the same year, the university was empowered to grant the degree of Bachelor of Secondary Education as well as the postgraduate course in Education. In 1956, it was granted Government Recognition #399 for the Bachelor of Elementary program with majors in General Education and Special Education. In 1973, it was granted permission to offer the Master of Arts in Teaching, and in 1977, its Doctor of Education program was recognized. The Institute of Education was granted permission in 1997 to offer 18 units of credits in professional education. In 2001 and in 2002, new programs were established – Bachelor of Science in Education major in Sports and Recreational Management (SRM) and the Teacher Certificate Program (TCP). Under the vertical articulation program of CHED, the administration of the graduate programs in Education was transferred from the Institute of Graduate Studies to the Institute of Education in 2007. To date, the Institute has graduated thousands who are actively engaged in the teaching profession not only as teachers and professors in public and private institutions of learning here and abroad but also as school administrators, researchers, authors of textbooks and other learning materials, as well as officials of government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beacon Academy Faculty List Ay 2020-2021 1
    THE BEACON ACADEMY FACULTY LIST AY 2020-2021 1. Mark Vincent Escaler Head of School MA Individualized Study – focus on Postmodern Philosophy & Film/Media Studies (Gallatin School of Individualized Study – New York University) 2. Maria Elena Paterno-Locsin Dean of Faculty & Acting Diploma Program/ Diploma Programme Senior High School Coordinator IB MYP School Visit Team Member Master of Education (Harvard University) DP English 3. Maria Teresa Roxas Dean of Students BA Anthropology (University of The Philippines) MYP Comparative Religion 4. Roy Aldrin Villegas Middle Years Program/Junior High School Coordinator BS Secondary Education (De La Salle University) MYP Biology, MYP Physics ---- 5. Natalie Albelar Guidance Counselor MA Counselling (De La Salle University) 6. Amor Andal Learning Support and Development Bachelor in Elementary Education, Major in Special Education (University of the Philippines) 7. Jose Badelles Arts Director AB Psychology (Ateneo De Manila University) DP Visual Arts THE BEACON ACADEMY FACULTY LIST AY 2020-2021 8. LeaH Joy Cabanban MA Education/ MA Business Management (University of the Philippines) DP Business and Management 9. Alfred Rey Capiral Fine Arts, Major in Painting (University of the Philippines) MYP Design, MYP Visual Arts 10. Helena Denise Clement College Counselor, Junior High School Bachelor of Business Administration (Loyola Marymount University) 11. Maria Celeste Coscolluela MA Creative Writing (University of the Philippines) DP English 12. Ana Maria David IB Examiner- Math Studies BS Industrial Engineering (Adamson University) DP Mathematics/Math Learning Support Teacher 13. Vian Claire Erasmo Guidance Counselor, Senior High School MA Counselling (Miriam College) 14. Ma. Concepcion Estacio Athletics Director B Communication Media Production (Assumption College) 15.
    [Show full text]
  • To View Publication As A
    International Institute on Peace Education (IIPE) & Community-Based Institutes on Peace Education (CIPE) Tony Jenkins, Co-Director, Peace Education Center, Teachers College, Columbia University, & Global Coordinator, International Institute on Peace Education INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE ON PEACE EDUCATION The International Institute on Peace Education (IIPE) was founded in 1982 and has since been held annually in different parts of the world. The first IIPE was held at Teachers College, Columbia University and organized by Professors Betty A. Reardon, Willard Jacobson and Douglas Sloan in cooperation with the United Ministries in Education. The IIPE is a multicultural and cooperative learning opportunity that has brought together educators and professionals from around the world to learn with and from each other in short-term learning communities that model principles of critical, participatory peace pedagogy. The Institute is an opportunity for networking and community building and has spawned a variety of collaborative research projects and peace education initiatives at the local, regional, and international levels. The International Peace Bureau, in nominating IIPE for the 2005 UNESCO Peace Education Prize described it as “probably the most effective agent for the introduction of peace education to more educators than any other single non-governmental agency.”(Weiss, 2005) The objectives of each particular institute are rooted in the needs and transformational concerns of the host region. More widely, the social purposes of the IIPE are directed toward the development of the field of peace education in theory, practice and advocacy. In addition to the important learning of contextually relevant issues and pedagogical approaches, the purposes of the IIPE are threefold: 1) To aid in the development of the substance of peace education through exploration of new and challenging themes to contribute to the on-going development of the field.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS the Most Advanced Technology Has Been
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. These are also available as one exposure on a standard 35mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms international A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 Nortfi Zeeb Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Philippines (2010)
    Page 1 of 9 Print Freedom in the World - Philippines (2010) Political Rights Score: 4 * Capital: Manila Civil Liberties Score: 3 * Status: Partly Free Population: 92,227,000 Trend Arrow The Philippines received a downward trend arrow due to a general decline in the rule of law in the greater Mindanao region, and specifically the massacre of 57 civilians on their way to register a candidate for upcoming elections. Overview Political maneuvering escalated in 2009 as potential candidates prepared for the 2010 presidential election. Meanwhile, the administration remained unsuccessful in its long-standing efforts to amend the constitution and resolve the country’s Muslim and leftist insurgencies. In November, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo declared martial law in the southern province of Maguindanao after 57 people were massacred in an apparent bid by the area’s dominant clan to prevent the electoral registration of a rival candidate. After centuries of Spanish rule, the Philippines came under U.S. control in 1898 and won independence in 1946. The country has been plagued by insurgencies, economic mismanagement, and widespread corruption since the 1960s. In 1986, a popular protest movement ended the 14-year dictatorship of President Ferdinand Marcos and replaced him with Corazon Aquino, whom the regime had cheated out of an electoral victory weeks earlier. Aquino’s administration ultimately failed to implement substantial reforms and was unable to dislodge entrenched social and economic elites. Fidel Ramos, a key figure in the 1986 protests, won the 1992 presidential election. The country was relatively stable and experienced significant if uneven economic growth under his administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Philippines – Electoral Security Assessment
    Philippines Electoral Security Assessment – Final Report July 2012 The Philippines Electoral Security Framework Electoral Security Assessment Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 11 I. Electoral Security Assessment ................................................................................................... 12 A. Contextual Analysis ..................................................................................................12 B. Historical Conflict .....................................................................................................21 C. Stakeholder Analysis .................................................................................................26 II. Electoral Security Planning ........................................................................................................ 35 III. Electoral Security Programming ............................................................................................... 40 IV. Monitoring and Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 45 V. Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 49 Annexes Annex I – Schedule of Meetings Annex II
    [Show full text]
  • CBCP Monitor A2 Vol
    New evangelization Pondo ng ECY @ 25... 25 years must begin with Pinoy @ Seven of youth service A3 the heart, Pope B1 B5 teaches Manila to hold 60-hour adoration for pope’s 60th sacerdotal anniv THE Archdiocese of Manila will hold a 60-hour Eucharistic adoration to mark the 60th anniversary of Pope Benedict XVI’s sacerdotal ordination on June 29. In a communiqué sent to all parish priests, rectors and religious superi- ors throughout the archdiocese, Ma- nila Archbishop Gaudencio Cardinal Rosales said the 60-hour adoration “presents an inspired occasion for us to 00 June 20 - July 3, 2011 Vol. 15 No. 13 Php 20. Sacerdotal / A6 Church soon to implement changes in Mass translation By Pinky Barrientos, FSP CHANGES in the English translation of the Order of the Mass are soon to hit parishes across the country when the full implementation of the new liturgical text is adapted next year. The adoption of the new English translation of the Ro- man Missal has been approved by the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) during its plenary assembly in January this year. Some parts of familiar responses and prayers have been amended to reflect the true meaning in the original Latin text, the language of the Roman liturgy. In the Introductory Rites, for instance, the response of the faithful “And also with you” to the priest’s greeting “The Lord be with you” has been replaced with “And with your spirit.” © Noli Yamsuan / RCAM Yamsuan © Noli Similar changes have also been introduced in other parts of the Mass, such as the Liturgy of the Word, Liturgy of the Eucharist and the Concluding Rites.
    [Show full text]
  • Papal Visit Philippines 2014 and 2015 2014
    This event is dedicated to the Filipino People on the occasion of the five- day pastoral and state visit of Pope Francis here in the Philippines on October 23 to 27, 2014 part of 22- day Asian and Oceanian tour from October 22 to November 13, 2014. Papal Visit Philippines 2014 and 2015 ―Mercy and Compassion‖ a Papal Visit Philippines 2014 and 2015 2014 Contents About the project ............................................................................................... 2 About the Theme of the Apostolic Visit: ‗Mercy and Compassion‘.................................. 4 History of Jesus is Lord Church Worldwide.............................................................................. 6 Executive Branch of the Philippines ....................................................................... 15 Presidents of the Republic of the Philippines ....................................................................... 15 Vice Presidents of the Republic of the Philippines .............................................................. 16 Speaker of the House of Representatives of the Philippines ............................................ 16 Presidents of the Senate of the Philippines .......................................................................... 17 Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines ...................................................... 17 Leaders of the Roman Catholic Church ................................................................ 18 Pope (Roman Catholic Bishop of Rome and Worldwide Leader of Roman
    [Show full text]