Fashion Index

FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 A

FASHION INDEX

A review of 100 of the biggest global fashion brands and retailers ranked according to how much they disclose about theirAPRIL social 2017and environmental policies, practices and impact. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 01 CONTENTS

03 FOREWORD 27 ANALYSIS & IMPLICATIONS 04 WHY TRANSPARENCY? 28 Analysis 05 Why greater transparency is important 29 Overall analysis in the fashion industry 30 1. Policy & Commitments 09 Viewpoint: Jenny Holdcroft, IndustriALL 34 2. Governance 10 What do we mean by transparency 37 3. Traceability 41 4. Know, Show, Fix 12 ABOUT THE FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 44 5. Spotlight Issues 13 What is the Fashion Transparency Index? 48 Viewpoint: Dr Mark Anner, Penn State 14 The methodology 15 The weighting of the scores 49 WHAT SHOULD YOU DO WITH THIS INFORMATION? 16 About the new methodology 50 Citizens 17 How the 100 brands were chosen 51 Brands and Retailers 18 How the research was conducted 52 NGOs, Unions and Workers 53 Governments and Policymakers 19 THE RESULTS 54 An important final note 20 A rough guide to the scoring 21 The final scores 55 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 22 1. Policy & Commitments 57 ANNEX 1 Definitions and Abbreviations 23 2. Governance 58 ANNEX 2 References 24 3. Traceability 25 4. Know, Show, Fix 26 5. Spotlight Issues

The content of this publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of any of the funders of Fashion Revolution. © Fashion Revolution CIC 2017. All rights reserved. This document is not to be copied or adapted without permission from Fashion Revolution CIC. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 02

Disclaimer Attribution Licences – Creative Commons

The Fashion Transparency Index is made available on While the material contained in this Index has been This work is owned by Fashion Revolution CIC (Company The Fashion Transparency Index is licensed under a the express request that it will be used only for general prepared in good faith, neither Fashion Revolution CIC number: 8988812) and has been written by Sarah Ditty, Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No information purposes. Readers are encouraged to form nor any of its partners, agents, representatives, advisers, along with support from Eloisa Artuso, Sophia Calugay, Derivatives 4.0 International Licence. It is not a Free Culture their own views and opinions on each of the brands affiliates, directors, officers or employees accept Ilishio Lovejoy, Aidan Shaw, Carry Somers, Sienna Somers Licence. Please see the link for more information: mentioned in this Index. All content in the Fashion any responsibility for or make any representations or and Manon Thomas, between January and March 2017. It https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Transparency Index is not to be construed as connected warranties (either express or implied) as to the accuracy, has been designed by Heather Knight. to or relating to any form of legal, governance, regulatory, completeness, reliability, or truth, of the information For the Raw Data File we make available we are not research or investment advice nor any other specific or contained in this Index or any other information made The C&A Foundation funded Fashion Revolution CIC who granting any licence for you to use the Raw Data, which general advice on buying, selling or dealing in any way available in connection with this Index, and disclaims in turn funded the research for this Index. We would like we have compiled to produce this Index. You are only with the brands mentioned in this Index. This Index has all liability for loss of any kind suffered by any party as to highlight our fair treatment of fact and our non-biased permitted to view the Raw Data File. not been prepared to any specific or general investment a result of the use of this Fashion Transparency Index. approach to assessing C&A, which is a partner on objectives. Before acting on anything inspired by anything Neither Fashion Revolution CIC nor any of its agents, sustainability projects with the C&A Foundation. The same You are free to copy and redistribute the Fashion contained in this Index, you must consider whether it is representatives, advisers, affiliates, directors, officers parent group, COFRA GROUP, owns both entities. Transparency Index in any medium or format provided suitable to your circumstances and, if necessary, seek and employees undertake any obligation to provide that you give Fashion Revolution credit for creating it. professional advice. No representation or warranty is given the users of this Index with additional information or to We have mitigated any risk of a conflict of interest by the This licence does not give you the right to alter, remix, that the material in this Index is accurate, complete or update the information contained therein or to correct any following three methods: viewing and treating C&A and the transform, translate or otherwise modify the content in any up-to-date. inaccuracies which may become apparent. C&A Foundation as separate entities; treating C&A like any way. This includes providing it as part of a paid service, nor other of the 99 brands we analysed; and we did not give as part of a consultancy or other service offering. You must The material in this Index is based on information that we Reference herein to any specific brand, commercial C&A any preferential treatment. contact Fashion Revolution at [email protected] have found in the public domain and reasonably consider product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, to obtain a licence if you want to commercialise the whole correct at time of publication. Fashion Revolution has not manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply or any part of this Index. verified, validated or audited the data used to prepare this its endorsement, recommendation, favouring, boycotting, Index. The assessment of fashion brands has been carried abusing, defaming by Fashion Revolution CIC nor any of © Fashion Revolution CIC 2017 out solely according to the new Fashion Transparency its agents, representatives, advisers, affiliates, directors, Index methodology and no other assessment models used officers and employees. Published 24th April 2017 by any of the project partners or our analyst team. Any statements, opinions, conclusions or recommendations To the maximum extent permitted by law any responsibility contained in this Index are honestly and reasonably held or liability for this Index or any related material is expressly or made at the time of publication. Any opinions expressed disclaimed provided that nothing in this disclaimer shall are our current opinions based on detailed research exclude any liability for, or any remedy in respect of, fraud as of the date of the publication of this Index only and or fraudulent misrepresentation. Any disputes, claims or may change without notice. Any views expressed in this proceedings in connection with or arising in relation to this Index only represent the views of Fashion Revolution CIC, Index will be governed by and construed in accordance unless otherwise expressly noted. The content of this with English law and submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of of the courts of England and Wales. any of the funders of Fashion Revolution CIC or the Fashion Transparency Index. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 03 FOREWORD

CARRY SOMERS FOUNDER AND GLOBAL OPERATIONS DIRECTOR FASHION REVOLUTION

The journeys made by our The complexity and fragmentation of "Transparency encourages The 2017 Fashion Transparency Index clothes remain largely unseen. the fashion supply chain was brought scrutiny, vigilance and shows which brands are already home to me after the Rana Plaza accountability. It's like taking steps towards becoming They may have started life factory collapse in Bangladesh, when opening one's front door more accountable, not just to in a field and then travelled campaigners had to physically search and allowing others to their shareholders but also to their through the rubble for clothing labels to look inside; not yet the full customers, and ultimately to their across a vast network, in prove which brands were producing in picture, but an important step workers. Ideally, this Index will act as many countries, through there. Many brands simply didn’t know towards openness and public a benchmark to encourage brands to the hands of hundreds of what their relationship was with those disclosure. And of course, the move towards greater transparency. factories. It was clear to me at that more doors are open, the more I hope the scores in this year’s Index workers, working for dozens moment that producers had become the picture becomes clearer, will also show people around the world of different companies, before faceless and that lack of transparency the better we can understand why it is so essential to keep on asking reaching our wardrobes. and accountability was costing lives. and ameliorate supply the question #whomademyclothes. chain workers' lives and Tragedies like Rana Plaza are eminently the environment." Greater transparency will bring direct preventable, but will continue to benefits to workers, their communities happen until brands, and every other and their environment. The 100 fashion stakeholder in the fashion supply chain, brands included in this Index have the takes responsibility for their actions and ORSOLA DE CASTRO potential to improve millions of lives FOUNDER AND CREATIVE DIRECTOR, impacts. Transparency is the first step FASHION REVOLUTION around the world. Transparency is one towards making this happen. step in the journey towards making this a reality. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

We don’t know enough about Overall brands are Increasing number of Few brands promoting efforts the impact our clothing has on widely sharing policies brands are disclosing who to extend the life of products people and planet and commitments their suppliers are and reduce consumption of resources Even the brands that come out in the Brands score relatively well for The good news is that 32 brands are highest range of scoring have a long disclosing their policies and publishing supplier lists (tier 1), which Only three brands — Burberry, Gucci way to go towards being transparent commitments. When it comes to is an increase from last year when and Levi Strauss — are promoting repair about their suppliers, supply chain publishing policies and commitments, Fashion Revolution surveyed 40 big services in order to extend the life of its management and their business the highest concentration of brands fashion companies and only five were products, while just 14 brands disclose practices. (16) scored in the 71-80% range with publishing supplier lists. 14 brands are investments in circular resources with 11 brands scoring above 80% and 15 publishing their processing facilities. the aim of keeping materials in The average score for all brands in brands scoring less than 20%. Banana Republic, Gap and Old Navy (all perpetual use and out of landfills. the Fashion Transparency Index is 49 owned by Gap Inc.) scored highest on out of 250, roughly 20% of all possible Brands publish little traceability (44%) because their supplier More opportunity to increase points. Adidas and Reebok achieved the information about the impacts lists include detailed information such supply chain transparency highest score of 121.5 out of 250 (49% of their practices as types of products or services and of the total possible points) — followed approximate number of workers in While brands are beginning to disclose by Marks & Spencer with 120 points and While we are seeing brands share their each supplier facility. more information about their practices H&M with 119.5 points (48% of the total policies and commitments, there is still —particularly with regard to their policies, possible points). much crucial information about the Still a long way to go towards procedures and suppliers — we know practices of the fashion industry that relatively little about the results of Only 8 brands scored higher than 40% paying a living wage remains concealed, particularly when it brands’ efforts to improve the social and and no brand scored above 50%. Three comes to brands’ tangible impact on the 34 out of the 100 brands have made environmental impacts of our clothing. brands scored zero, disclosing nothing lives of workers in the supply chain and public commitments to paying living Therefore brands still have a long way to at all — Dior, Heilan Home and s.Oliver. on the environment. Brands score far wages to workers in the supply chain go towards transparency. 32 brands scored 10% or less, revealing fewer points when you drive into detail (such as through collective bargaining a limited number of policies and about what they do and the effects of agreements or as part of the Fair Labor procedures. their supply chain efforts. For example, Association) but only four brands — the majority of brands (84%) describe H&M, Marks & Spencer, New Look and having established factory assessment Puma — are reporting on progress procedures in place. However, on average towards achieving this aim. brands score just 21% when it comes to disclosing detailed results of their supplier assessments and score 20% on average when it comes to sharing detailed remediation activities. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 05

WHY TRANSPARENCY? FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 06 WHY GREATER TRANSPARENCY IS IMPORTANT IN THE FASHION INDUSTRY

Today, both people and Lack of transparency costs lives the environment suffer It is impossible for brands to make as a result of the way sure human rights are respected fashion is made, sourced and that environmental practices are sound without knowing where their and consumed. It's time products are made, who is making for a Fashion Revolution, them and under what conditions. and we believe that the It has been four years since Rana beginning of this process Plaza collapsed; the day that the is greater transparency. Fashion Revolution movement was born. The factories operating At the moment, most of the world in the Rana Plaza building made lives in a capitalist economy. This clothes for over a dozen well-known means companies must increase international clothing brands, many sales growth and make profits in of them included in this report. order to succeed — but crucially, not It took weeks for several brands at the expense of peoples’ working to determine whether they had conditions, health, livelihoods, dignity connections with the factories inside [TOP] 'Dhaka Savar Building Collapse' by rijans via Flickr CC and creativity and not at the expense that building, despite their clothing of our natural environment. labels being found in the rubble. [Bottom] 'Site of the Rana Plaza factory collapse' by Sarah Jay FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 07

Fashion supply chains If you can't see it, are long and complex you can't fix it

The vast majority of today’s When companies publish fashion brands do not own their information about their supply manufacturing facilities, making it chains and business practices seem difficult to monitor or control it helps NGOs, unions, local working conditions throughout communities and even workers the supply chain. It can also be a themselves to more swiftly alert TRANSPARENCY convenient excuse for brands to brands to human rights and evade responsibility for how their environmental issues. It can also products are made. help the company keep track of any unauthorised suppliers being Some brands may work with used to make its products1, which thousands of factories at any given makes it easier to manage risks time – and that is just the facilities that might lead to human rights and that cut, sew and assemble our environmental abuses and could garments. There are also facilities harm the company's reputation. down the chain that dye, weave and ACCOUNTABILITY finish materials and farms that grow This sort of transparent disclosure fibres too. During the manufacturing makes it easier for all the relevant process our clothes are touched by parties to understand what went a great many pairs of hands before wrong, who is responsible and how they reach the rails or shelves of the to fix it. We believe that transparency shop floor. leads to greater accountability, which eventually will lead to a change in A brand might place an order with the way business is done. one supplier, who carves up the order and sub-contracts the work to other factories. This happens regularly across the industry and CHANGE presents a great challenge for brands themselves as well as the people working in the supply chain who become invisible in this process.

1. As explained by Human Rights Watch: www.hrw.org/news/2016/09/08/gap-inc-joins-global-brands-publish-factory-list FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017

People want to know Transparency helps people who #whomademyclothes are concerned about the human and environmental impact of People are increasingly asking what they purchase to make more for greater transparency from the informed decisions. Transparency brands they buy. During Fashion helps consumers scrutinise brands Revolution Week last year, the but also builds trust in the brands #whomademyclothes hashtag they buy. reached 129 million people through 70,000 posts on Twitter and Instagram.

Transparency is quickly becoming the norm as explained in the Business of Fashion last year:

"For decades, a brand’s only priority was to create the best possible product at the most competitive price to ensure sales. But as consumers develop a more comprehensive understanding of issues like sustainability, authenticity and transparency, brands and retailers are being forced to change the way they sell in order to survive”

BUSINESS OF FASHION 29 SEPT 2016 FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 09

"Transparency is the cornerstone of credibility. At Fairtrade, we believe transparency helps businesses and consumers to make informed choices so that they don’t feed exploitation faced by so many people who grow the cotton and make our clothes"

SUBINDU GARKHEL COTTON PRODUCT MANAGER, FAIRTRADE FOUNDATION @WEAREZRCL PHOTOGRAPHY FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 10 WHY ARE TRANSPARENT SUPPLY CHAINS NECESSARY?

JENNY HOLDCROFT ASSISTANT GENERAL SECRETARY INDUSTRIALL GLOBAL UNION © IndustriALL Bangladesh Council

The end of 2016 saw a major Increased accountability means Without being able to verify brands' crackdown on labour rights in Ashulia, issues along the supply chain can be "Increased suppliers, workers must remove labels Dhaka’s garment district, following addressed and solutions found faster. accountability from a supplier to create the link back demands for higher wages. to the brand. This is problematic as it Knowing the names of major buyers means issues puts workers at risk and furthermore, The Bangladeshi government and from factories gives workers and their along the supply it is only circumstantial evidence of the garment factory owners used the wage unions a stronger leverage, crucial link. This puts the burden of proof on strike as a pretext to suspend more for a timely solution when resolving chain can be the worker where in fact it should be than 1,600 workers, and arrest 35 union conflicts, whether it be refusal to with the brand. leaders and garment workers. recognize the union, or unlawful addressed sackings for demanding their rights. and solutions The fourth anniversary of the Calling on the government of Rana Plaza collapse on 24 April is Bangladesh to release the people in jail It also provides the possibility to found faster a stark reminder that voluntary, and for all charges to be dropped was create a link from the worker back non-transparent inspections should one part of the action taken. Another was to the customer and possibly media be a thing of the past. Increased to call on the brands supplying from the to bring attention to the issues. transparency is an important step factories involved. But without access to for improving industrial relations in the information it was difficult to create the supply chain. meaningful leverage to mitigate severe labour and human rights violations. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017

WHAT DO TRANSPARENCY WE MEAN BY TRANSPARENCY?

For Fashion Revolution, Transparency is a means transparency means public to change, not an end FAIR TRADE disclosure of brands’ policies, Transparency is not the end game. WELL-BEING procedures, goals and Ultimately, Fashion Revolution commitments, performance, believes that the whole fashion LIVING WAGES progress and real-world impacts industry needs a radical paradigm shift and that the way that we EMPOWERMENT on workers, communities and produce and consume clothes the environment. needs to be transformed. This means GENDER EQUALITY business models will need to change Transparency requires brands to and a multiplicity of solutions will know exactly who makes their BUSINESS ACCOUNTABILITY be required. products – from who stitched them right through to who dyed the fabric Transparency shines SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS and who farmed the cotton. And a light on issues often crucially, it requires brands to share kept in the dark GOOD WORKING CONDITIONS this information publicly. Transparency alone does not ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY Some brands opt to disclose supply represent the sort of structural, chain information to selected NGOs systemic change we would like to or unions rather than publicly, and see for the fashion industry — but have done so for many years in it helps us get there. Transparency order to manage their supply chain helps to reveal the structures in risks. However, we feel this is not place so we can better understand enough. Health and safety incidents, how to change them. A FAIRER, SAFER, CLEANER widespread abuses and even deaths are still happening, despite this FASHION INDUSTRY industry-facing disclosure. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 12 TO ACHIEVE CHANGE WE RECOGNISE 3 IMPORTANT THINGS:

It’s a process More information is needed Inclusivity is key

It is going to be a long journey towards a different Many people continue to shop from Millions of workers are employed through the industry model, requiring many incremental but big corporate brands, but want more supply chains of these big brands, and we necessary steps, to turn the tide of fast fashion tools to understand how products must be careful to ensure that future of the or other unsustainable business models. We are made, where they are made, by fashion industry is able to provide decent work, believe the first step is greater transparency. whom and under what conditions. sustainable livelihoods, hope and integrity for This will take consumers, brands and retailers, everyone employed in it, from farm to retail. governments and citizens in supply chains each taking action. Fashion Revolution is engaging with all of these groups to catalyse positive change. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 13

ABOUT THE FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 14

WHAT IS THE The scope What's not in scope We have deliberately chosen to focus The Fashion Transparency Index FASHION on transparency and not everything does not tell you what brands are that brands are doing. Shining a light good or bad, naughty or nice, nor TRANSPARENCY on transparency isn't the only way to decent or exploitative. Unfortunately, fundamentally change the fashion we don’t think a simple answer industry, but it's a powerful starting to this dichotomy exists. INDEX? point. If the information disclosed by brands is granular enough, it can There are limits to desk-based be useful for others (experts, NGOs, research, and only on-the- unions, workers themselves) who ground research by NGOs, unions want to hold them to account for any and academics can reveal the real-world impacts on producers impacts of brands' policies and and the environment. This is why we practices. By encouraging brands are looking for disclosure not only to become more transparent, on brands’ policies and procedures, the Fashion Transparency Index which is perhaps easier for them will facilitate the work of NGOs, to share, but also on performance, unions and academics. progress and impacts across the At the end of this report you will business and its supply chain. The Fashion Transparency What we hope to achieve find a list of organisations who through the Fashion have undertaken detailed on- Index 2017 reviews and A 2017 report from the NYU Transparency Index Stern Center for Business and the-ground research into the ranks 100 of the biggest Human Rights explains: effects that brands' policies and Through researching and publishing global fashion and apparel procedures can have on workers, the Fashion Transparency Index "Companies understandably their families and communities. brands and retailers year on year, we hope it will push are likely to highlight the according to how much brands in a more positive direction efforts they make, often towards a reimagining of the fashion information they disclose through their corporate industry and a fundamental shift social responsibility or about their suppliers, in the way it works, beginning communications departments, supply chain policies and with being more transparent. rather than the higher-cost, The Fashion Transparency Index higher-risk analysis of practices, and social and the effectiveness of environmental impacts. is simply one small tool in our wider efforts to fundamentally those efforts” change the fashion industry. This is exactly the type of detail brands might be reluctant to disclose but is crucial for change. This is why we are advocating for transparency. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 15

The Fashion Transparency Index uses a ratings methodology to THE benchmark brands' disclosure across five key areas, including: policy and commitments, governance, traceability, supplier assessment METHODOLOGY and remediation, and 'spotlight issues' covering the business model, living wages, unions and collective bargaining. We have awarded points only for information that has been publicly disclosed.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. POLICY & GOVERNANCE TRACEABILITY KNOW, SHOW & FIX SPOTLIGHT ISSUES COMMITMENTS

—What are the brand’s social —Who in the brand —Does the brand publish a —How does the brand assess —What is the brand doing to and environmental policies? is responsible for the list of its suppliers, from the implementation of its ensure workers are being brand’s social and manufacturing to raw supplier policies? paid a living wage? —How is the brand putting its environmental impacts? material level? policies into practice? —How does the brand fix —What is the brand doing to —How can they be contacted? —If so, how much detail problems when found in support workers’ Freedom —How does the brand decide do they share? its supplier facilities? of Association? which issues to prioritise? —How does the brand incorporate human rights —Does the brand report —What is the brand doing —What are the brand’s future and environmental issues assessment findings? to reduce consumption goals for improving its into its buying and sourcing of resources? impacts? —How can workers report practices? grievances?

For further detail of the methodology, download the full brand questionnaire . FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 16

The 2017 methodology focuses Please be aware that when brands WEIGHTING OF exclusively on public disclosure of score zero on an individual indicator, supply chain information. Therefore, it doesn’t necessarily mean anything THE SCORES the weighting of the scores is intended bad. It just means they’re not to emphasise increasing levels of disclosing their efforts publicly. detailed disclosure, especially when it comes to publishing supplier lists and the results of supplier assessments. We are rewarding granularity.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. POLICY & COMMITMENTS GOVERNANCE TRACEABILITY KNOW, SHOW & FIX SPOTLIGHT ISSUES

TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 85 (250) 50 12 75 28

WEIGHTING (%) 20% 5% 34% 30% 11% FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 17 ABOUT THE NEW METHODOLOGY

You may have noticed that The 2017 methodology has been The individuals and organisations we Please be aware that this research the methodology has changed designed by the Fashion Revolution consulted on the methodology do only measures a moment in time, since last year. team, led by Sarah Ditty and Carry not necessarily endorse the findings and there are plenty of important Somers, with consultative input and detailed within this report. The key topics that the Fashion Transparency The 2016 methodology was created feedback from a committee of objective of our consultative process Index doesn’t cover; for example, by Ethical Consumer with input from pro bono industry experts, including: was to gather feedback from a variety cost and pricing transparency. Fashion Revolution. For 2017, Fashion of perspectives to help inform and Revolution has taken a lead on the • Dr Mark Anner, Associate Professor shape its strategy and design. Therefore, we believe that this report further development of the Fashion of Labor and Employment is most useful for analysing patterns Transparency Index, including a Relations, and Director of the Throughout these discussions, input rather than micro-scrutinising each revision of the methodology. Center for Global Workers' Rights served to highlight both the immense brand’s individual scores. We would at Penn State University challenges still remaining and the encourage readers to use this Index We spent four months at the end of • Neil Brown, Investment Manager significant opportunities for industry as a proxy to better understand last year consulting a diverse group at Alliance Trust Investments wide improvement on transparency. generally what level of transparency of more than 20 industry experts on we are seeing from big global brands • Ian Cook, Associate Professor of revisions. The new methodology is on social and environmental issues. also based on existing international Geography at University of Exeter standards and benchmarks including: • Subindhu Garkhel, Cotton Product "The 2017 research We hope readers will use this as Sustainable Development Goals, Manager at Fairtrade Foundation will serve as a an opportunity to start a wider Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code, • Jenny Holdcroft, Assistant Secretary baseline by which conversation about how much UN Guiding Principles, OECD Due General at IndustriALL Global Union (or rather how little) we know Diligence Guidelines and Fair we can measure about the clothes we wear and • Dr Alessandra Mezzadri, Labor Association’s Freedom brands increased the people who make them. Lecturer in Development Studies of Association guidelines. at SOAS, University of London transparency year • Heather Webb, Researcher on year" at Ethical Consumer • and several others experts who wished to remain unnamed. SARAH DITTY HEAD OF POLICY, FASHION REVOLUTION FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 18 HOW THE 100 100 BRANDS BRANDS WERE CHOSEN A—Z

Brands were selected on the basis of three factors: Abercrombie & Fitch Giorgio Armani Nike Adidas Gucci (Kering Group) Nordstrom Aéropostale Guess Old Navy (Gap Inc.) Amazon H&M Pernambucanas American Eagle Hanes Prada according to annual turnover, over $1.2 billion USD Anthropologie (URBN) Heilan Home Primark (ABF) 1 Asics Corporation Hermès Pull&Bear (Inditex) ASOS Hudson's Bay (HBC) Puma (Kering Group) Banana Republic (Gap Inc.) Hugo Boss Ralph Lauren Benetton JCPenney Reebok (Adidas) voluntarily agreed to be included after last year’s edition Bershka (Inditex) J.Crew Renner 2 Bottega Veneta (Kering Group) Jack & Jones (Bestseller) Ross Stores Burberry Jordan (Nike, Inc.) Russell Athletic Burlington Kohl's s.Oliver C&A Lacoste Sak's Fifth Avenue (HBC) representing a cross-section of market segments including Calvin Klein (PVH) Lands End Target high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim Calzedonia Levi Strauss & Co Tesco 3 from across Europe, North America, South America and Asia Champion (HanesBrands) LL Bean The North Face (VF Corp) Chanel LOFT Timberland (VF Corp) Chico's Louis Vuitton (LVMH) TJ Maxx (TJX) Claire's Accessories Lululemon Tommy Hilfiger (PVH) We relied on publicly available financial information. COACH Macy's Topshop (Arcadia Group) Columbia Sportswear Mango Triumph Some big brands are privately held and do not publish financial records, Converse (Nike, Inc.) Marks & Spencer Under Armour including turnover, which means we were unable to include them in Costco Massimo Dutti (Inditex) Uniqlo (Fast Retailing) Dillard's Matalan Urban Outfitters this edition. Where brands are part of a parent company* with annual Dior Mexx Victoria's Secret turnover over $1.2 billion USD, we have selected the brand or brands that Ermenegildo Zegna Michael Kors Walmart appear to make up the most significant part of the group’s business. Esprit Miu Miu (Prada Group) Wrangler (VF Corp) Express Monsoon YSL (Kering Group) Forever 21 Neiman Marcus Zalando Gap New Balance Zara (Inditex) *In general, the scores for brands which are part of a parent company apply to all of the subsidiaries in George at Asda (Walmart) New Look the parent company, not just the brands included in this report. There are some exceptions: for example, Gildan Activewear Next George at ASDA and Walmart; and Puma and Kering Group. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 19 HOW THE RESEARCH WAS CONDUCTED

• We sent each brand a questionnaire, We researched and scored We intend to keep the first four core The Fashion Transparency Index which helped us identify where brands regardless of whether they sections of this methodology the used only publicly disclosed information is publicly disclosed completed the questionnaire or not. same in future annual editions of information about each brand’s: and to clarify information we found However, brands that completed the Fashion Transparency Index in through our own research in order the questionnaire were more likely order to measure progress year on • policies; to ensure accuracy. Brands were to receive a higher score than they year, with 2017 acting as the baseline. • procedures and processes; given one month to respond and would have otherwise. This is simply However, this research is very much a • performance, progress return the questionnaire. We received because our researchers may have learning process, and we are always and impacts; completed questionnaires covering missed some information. There is open to ideas for improvement. • corporate governance; and 48 brands, meaning no response no common template for reporting • supplier details; or declines from the remaining 52 on social and environmental issues The research was conducted by focusing on human rights brands. The questionnaires returned that every brand is using. Many Sarah Ditty and Carry Somers, with and environmental issues to us by brands were analysed by companies produce annual reports support from Sophia Calugay, Ilishio across its supply chains. our research team, and scores that span 200-400 pages; and as such Lovejoy, Aidan Shaw, Sienna Somers, were awarded where appropriate. there is a notable margin for human Eloisa Artuso and Manon Thomas, We relied solely on error. This is an inherent limitation of between January and March 2017. information published via: QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSE desk-based research. However, our • the brand's website(s); research team endeavoured to be as • parent company website(s); thorough, accurate and fair as possible. 48% • in annual/sustainability reports Should you know of any remaining (published January 2015 or later); of brands completed inaccuracies, please contact us at • or via third party websites but only and returned a questionnaire [email protected] when linked to directly from the and we will take this into company’s own websites or reports. 52% account for the next edition. did not respond or declined the opportunity to complete the questionnaire FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 20

THE FINAL SCORES

To download the full spreadsheet of results, click here. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 21

A ROUGH GUIDE Total scores were out of 250 possible points, which we have converted TO THE SCORING into percentages. We chose to publish percentages rather than each brands' individual scores because we felt it encourages readers to focus on emerging patterns rather than exact details.

0—10% 11—20% 21—30% 31—40% 41—50% 51—60% 61—70% 71—80% 81—90% 91—100%

TRANSPARENCY

Brands scoring between Brands scoring between Brands scoring between Brands scoring between Brands scoring over 40% are No brands score above 50% but if they 0-5% are disclosing nothing 11-20% are likely to be 20-30% are likely to be 30-40% are the brands who those who are most likely to did these brands would be disclosing all of at all or a very limited publishing a majority of publishing much more are publishing suppliers be publishing more detailed the information already described as well number of policies, which policies, some procedures detailed information lists as well as detailed supplier lists, some will as publishing detailed information about tend to be related to the and information about their about their policies, information about their be publishing processing assessment and remediation findings and brand's job hiring practices supplier assessment and procedures, social and policies, procedures, social facilities as well as detailed supplier lists from manufacturing or local community remediation processes. environmental goals and and environmental goals, manufacturers — in addition right down to raw materials. These brands engagement activities. supplier assessment and supplier assessment and to detailed information about would be making public commitments remediation processes. remediation processes their policies, procedures, to paying living wages across their supply Brands scoring between and general assessment social and environmental chain and reporting on progress towards 5-10% are likely to be findings. These brands goals, supplier assessment meeting this aim. These brands would publishing some policies are also more likely to be and remediation processes be disclosing the number of workers in for both its own employees addressing the Spotlight and general assessment their supply chain covered by collective and suppliers. Those closer Issues such as living wages, findings. These brands bargaining agreements or part of trade to 10% are likely to be collective bargaining and/ are also more likely to be unions. These brands would be their publishing a basic supplier or circular resources. addressing the Spotlight mapping social and environmental impacts code of conduct and Issues such as living wages, into their financial business model. some detailed information collective bargaining and/ about their procedures or circular resources. and possibly supplier assessment process. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 22

THE FINAL SCORES

0-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% 41-50% 51-60% 61-70% 71-80% 81-90% 91-100%

Abercrombie & Fitch 10 Next 20 Tesco 30 Esprit 37 Adidas 49 American Eagle 10 Asics Corporation 20 Calvin Klein 29 Bershka 36 Reebok 49 Dillard’s 10 Champion 20 Tommy Hilfiger 29 Massimo Dutti 36 Marks & Spencer 48 Ralph Lauren 9 Hanes 20 Bottega Veneta 28 Pull&Bear 36 H&M 48 Amazon 9 Benetton 19 Gucci 28 Zara 36 Puma 46 Calzedonia 9 Russell Athletic 18 YSL 28 Converse 36 Banana Republic 46 Triumph 9 New Balance 18 Gildan Activewear 27 Jordan 36 Gap 46 Michael Kors 8 LOFT 17 Hugo Boss 27 Nike 36 Old Navy 46 Monsoon 8 Macy's 17 Uniqlo 26 Levi Strauss & Co 35 Giorgio Armani 8 TJ Maxx 17 Burberry 25 C&A 34 Pernambucanas 8 Zalando 16 Lululemon 25 ASOS 33 Ross Stores 8 Lands End 16 Topshop 25 Target 32 Burlington 8 Jack & Jones 15 The North Face 24 Miu Miu 8 Columbia Sportswear 15 Timberland 24 Prada 8 Nordstrom 15 Wrangler 24 Aéropostale 7 Louis Vuitton 15 Primark 24 Chico’s 7 Renner 15 George at Asda 23 Anthropologie 7 JCPenney 14 Hermès 22 Urban Outfitters 7 Kohl's 13 Walmart 22 Mexx 6 Mango 13 COACH 21 Neiman Marcus 6 Costco 13 Hudson's Bay 21 Ermenegildo Zegna 5 Guess 12 Sak's Fifth Avenue 21 Lacoste 5 J.Crew 11 New Look 21 Express 4 Victoria's Secret 11 Claire's Accessories 3 Under Armour 11 Forever 21 3 LL Bean 3 Chanel 1 Matalan 1 Dior 0 Heilan Home 0 s.Oliver 0

* Brands ranked in numerical order by score out of 250, but shown as rounded-up percentage. Where brands have the same percentage score, they are listed in alphabetical order and grouped with others from same parent company FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 23 OVERALL ANALYSIS

Still a long way to go Transparent policies, Lots of fluffy communication No common framework towards transparency opaque performance for disclosure There were many instances where Even the brands who come out in Brands score relatively well for our researchers would trawl through There is a lack of consistent the top range of scoring — those not disclosing their policies and a 300+ page annual report only to find standards for reporting on social even half way up the ladder — have commitments but score fewer a couple of sentences that counted and environmental issues. There a long way to go towards being points when you drive into detail for transparent disclosure on some is no common template. Brands transparent about their suppliers, about what they do and the effects of the key issues we were looking at. present information in many different supply chain management and of their supply chain efforts. As a result, there is a lot of “noise” formats, using all sorts of language their business practices. to cut through; in other words, pages and industry jargon and present it Information is hard to find and pages of information that don't using an array of different visuals. The average score for all brands in tell you much about what brands are the Fashion Transparency Index is 49 This research was a long and rather actually doing, or at least makes it It would be helpful if there was out of 250, roughly 20% of all possible arduous process. If you wanted to difficult to decipher. Far more space one common template by which points. Adidas and Reebok achieved find out exactly what brands are is given to brands' values and beliefs brands disclosed social and the highest score of 121.5 out of 250 doing and how they are performing than to their actions and outcomes. environmental policies, practices (49% of the total possible points)— on social and environmental issues, and performance, and if this followed by Marks & Spencer with it is difficult — sometimes entirely No wonder even the most conscious template used common, easy-to- 120 points and H&M with 119.5 points impossible — to find this information. consumer finds it all so confusing. understand language and visuals. (48% of the total possible points). Information is often found many How are we supposed to make But what’s most needed is for clicks away from the homepage of informed decisions about what we While we are seeing brands begin governments to legally require that brands’ websites or housed on micro- buy when the information is either to publish more about their social brands are disclosing supplier lists and sites, not even on the brands’ main entirely absent or presented in and environmental efforts, which is social and environmental information website. You would need a lot of time such varied and diffuse ways? welcome and necessary, there is still using a common framework. Without to find the relevant information and much crucial information about the this, brands will continue to willingly would require nuanced knowledge practices of the fashion industry that disclose only selected information and to make sense of the information remains concealed, particularly when in whatever format they determine best. that brands’ typically disclose. it comes to brands’ tangible impact on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 24 QUICK FINDINGS

Average score is 49 out of 250 (20%) Not a single brand is scoring above 50%

3 brands scored zero, disclosing nothing at all Only 8 brands score higher than 40%

20 NO. OF BRANDS OF NO.

0 1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100

FINAL SCORE (%)

TRANSPARENCY

For further detailed results, download the complete dataset FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 25

THE SCORES ACROSS THE 5 KEY AREAS

To download the full spreadsheet of results, click here. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 26 AVERAGE SCORES ACROSS THE SECTIONS

49% 34% 8% 16% 9% 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. POLICY & GOVERNANCE TRACEABILITY KNOW, SHOW & FIX SPOTLIGHT ISSUES COMMITMENTS

The highest concentration of The largest number of brands Overall brands are disclosing The highest concentration of Overall brands are disclosing brands scored in the 71-80% (37) score less than 10%. 13 few details about their brands (36) fall in the 11-20% little about their efforts to pay range with 11 brands scoring brands fall in the 41-50% range. suppliers. The good news is range and many others (31) score living wages or to support above 80% and 16 brands Marks & Spencer is the only that 32 brands are publishing less than 10%. Adidas and Reebok collective bargaining and scoring 20% or less. brand to score 100% meaning suppliers lists (tier 1). 14 brands score highest in the 31-40% unionisation. Few brands that they’re disclosing who in the are publishing their processing range. Brands often disclose are disclosing their efforts to By and large, brands are team is responsible for social facilities. No one is publishing their supplier assessment address overconsumption disclosing the most about their and environmental issues, their raw material suppliers. processes and procedures. of resources. Only 8 brands policies and commitments on along with their contact details, Gap Inc. brands come out on However, brands share little scored above 31% and no social and environmental issues. board level accountability, and top because their supplier lists information about the results brand scored above 50%. how other staff and suppliers include detailed information of these efforts nor do brands are incentivised to improve such as types of products/ share much about the effects performance. services and number of of their efforts to fix problems in workers in each facility. factories when found. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 27 1. POLICY & COMMITMENTS APPROACH

What are the brand’s human rights and We typically found this information on brands’ environmental policies and procedures websites and in Employee Handbooks, Company for its own staff and suppliers? Code of Ethics, Supplier Codes of Conduct, Supplier Guidebooks, sustainability and annual reports and sometimes even on career/job vacancies webpages. We looked for policies & procedures covering the following issues: SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL PRIORITIES AND GOALS FOR THE FUTURE • Animal Welfare • Holidays, Sick Leave • Anti-bribery, Corruption & Time Off In this section, we also looked at whether brands are & Presentation of • Living Conditions/ disclosing their top human rights and environmental False Information Dormitories priorities (often this is something called a materiality • Biodiversity • Living Wages & matrix). Certain issues will be more relevant and • Child Labour Benefits (e.g. bonuses, of higher risk or importance to brands and its insurance, social • Community Engagement security, pensions) suppliers than others. We did not award points if brands count their entire sustainability or Corporate • Discrimination • Maternity Rights/ • Diversity & Inclusion Parental Leave Social Responsibility (CSR) report as a materiality assessment. • Effluents • Notice Period, Dismissal & Disciplinary Action • Emissions & Energy We also looked to see whether brands are publishing • Equal Pay • Recruitment & Terms their goals or a strategic roadmap for improving of Employment • Forced or Bonded social and environmental impacts across the supply Labour • Sub-contracting chain. We only counted these goals if they were & Outsourcing • Foreign & Migrant Labour reaching into the future, time-bound, measureable • Use of Chemicals • Freedom of Association, and if progress was reported publicly and annually. Right to Organise & • Waste & Recycling Collective Bargaining (Packaging/Paper) • Grievances & • Waste & Recycling Whistleblowing (Product/Textiles) • Harassment & Abuse • Water Usage • Health & Safety • Working Hours FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 28

1. POLICY & COMMITMENTS

0-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% 41-50% 51-60% 61-70% 71-80% 81-90% 91-100%

Claire's Accessories 7 Michael Kors 20 Russell Athletic 30 JCPenney 40 New Balance 50 LOFT 60 Walmart 68 Esprit 79 Bershka 86 Puma 97 Ermenegildo Zegna 7 Calzedonia 16 Mexx 29 Ralph Lauren 40 Zalando 50 New Look 59 Primark 67 Hugo Boss 79 Massimo Dutti 86 Marks & Spencer 94 Chanel 3 Dillard’s 16 Costco 27 Columbia Sportswear 39 Benetton 46 Hermès 57 Louis Vuitton 66 Topshop 79 Pull&Bear 86 Adidas 93 Matalan 1 Aéropostale 15 Pernambucanas 27 J.Crew 37 Renner 45 Lands End 57 ASOS 65 Bottega Veneta 78 Zara 86 Reebok 93 Dior 0 Chico’s 15 Ross Stores 27 Guess 35 Victoria's Secret 43 Macy's 56 Asics Corporation 64 Gucci 78 Calvin Klein 86 H&M 91 Heilan Home 0 Express 15 Monsoon 26 Champion 34 Hudson's Bay 42 Uniqlo 56 Target 64 YSL 78 Tommy Hilfiger 86 s.Oliver 0 Abercrombie & Fitch 12 Anthropologie 23 Hanes 34 Sak's Fifth Avenue 42 The North Face 55 Tesco 64 Banana Republic 77 Forever 21 11 Urban Outfitters 23 Amazon 33 Kohl's 42 Timberland 55 Lululemon 61 Gap 77 LL Bean 11 Lacoste 23 Giorgio Armani 33 Mango 42 Wrangler 55 Old Navy 77 Under Armour 23 Miu Miu 32 Next 54 Converse 76 American Eagle 21 Prada 32 COACH 53 Jordan 76 Neiman Marcus 21 Burlington 31 George at Asda 51 Nike 76 Triumph 31 Jack & Jones 51 Levi Strauss & Co 76 Nordstrom 51 Burberry 74 TJ Maxx 51 C&A 74 Gildan Activewear 71

HOW MANY BRANDS PUBLISH POLICIES?*

In Supplier Code of Conduct Forced or Bonded Labour 88 Applying to brand’s Child Labour 87 own employees Working Hours 37 87 Discrimination 79 86 Health & Safety 68 86 Freedom of Association, Right to Organise & Collective Bargaining 27 82 Harrassment & Abuse 71 80 Subcontracting & Outsourcing 63 Anti-bribery, Corruption & Presentation of False Information 61 79 Effluents 57 Use of Chemicals 57 68

Animal Welfare 57 Emissions & Energy 54 70 Living Conditions/Dormitories 51 Equal Pay 41 49 Grievances & Whistleblowing 48 70 Living Wages & Benefits 20 47 Recruitment & Terms of Employment 16 44 Water Use 33 52 Foreign & Migrant Labour 32

Maternity Rights/Parental Leave 28 30 Waste & Recycling (Product/Textiles) 28 37 Biodiversity 27 35 Holidays & Sick Leave 23 27 Notice Period, Dismissal & Disciplinary Action 13 26 Community Engagement 19 70 Diversity & Inclusion 70 Waste & Recycling (Other) 64

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 * Graph ordered by most common policies that apply to suppliers FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 30 1. POLICY & COMMITMENTS FINDINGS

HOW MANY BRANDS PUBLISH POLICIES?

78 brands report about their Only 20 brands disclose Only 16 brands disclose how 43 brands publish a community engagement procedures that address worker dormitory policies materiality assessment for activities at home or in maternity rights are put into practice high risk supply chain issues sourcing countries

55 brands publish goals 50 brands report on some 70 brands describe health Only 40 brands disclose to improve social and progress towards these goals & safety procedures how child labour policies environmental impact are put into practice FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 31 1. POLICY & COMMITMENTS IMPLICATIONS

Transparency on policies and Over 87% of brands are publishing Less than half the brands disclose a Brands are disclosing the least about processes but opacity on seven of the 26 supplier policies. policy on textile waste and just 33% of their actual performance, impacts and performance and impact Only three brands are not disclosing brands publish a policy on water use at progress on social and environmental any policies. Some brands’ policies the manufacturing level. issues. Far fewer brands are disclosing Brands are disclosing the most are nothing more than a one-line the results of the factory assessment information about their policies, sentence, while other brands might When it comes to putting policies into process and what impacts their supply procedures and commitments on include several pages of detailed policy practice, brands are disclosing most chain efforts are having towards social and environmental issues in a supplier code of conduct. We about their procedures on issues such improving conditions for workers in (section 1 and the first part of awarded the same points for both. as community engagement, carbon supplier facilities. This means the section 4 of the methodology). emissions, health and safety and public has virtually no way of knowing Brands often publish a Code of Brands’ supplier policies frequently recycling at the company level. They if brands’ policies and procedures Business Ethics, a Supplier Code of cover the most egregious issues such are disclosing far less about putting are truly effective and driving Conduct and some sort of annual as child labour (87% of brands have a policies into practice at the supplier improvements for the people making report covering their CSR policy on this issue); discrimination level, especially on issues such as our clothes. More on this point later in and sustainability initiatives. (86%); freedom of association (82%); worker dormitories, maternity rights section 4. forced labour (88%); harassment and and recruitment. Publishing these policies, abuse (80%); health & safety (86%); and Brands need not only to be transparent procedures and commitments is working hours (87%). Surprisingly only 55 brands are publishing time-bound about their policies and procedures important because it helps increase 32% of brands’ supplier policies cover commitments to improving their social but also put more focus on the actual accountability. If a brand is found not foreign and migrant labour, people and environmental impacts, of which outcomes of their efforts to manage to be making good on its promises, who are an increasingly important and 50 are reporting on progress towards and improve human rights and it risks damaging its reputation and vulnerable part of the garment industry achieving their goals. environmental impact. as a result its bottom line. workforce, according to SOMO.

We were looking for an array of social However, 18 brands do not disclose a and environmental policies (see policy on Freedom of Association and pp 27-29) for brands' own employees the Right to Organise, 14 brands do not and their suppliers. We found that disclose a policy on health and safety, 98% were publishing some relevant and 13 brands do not disclose a policy on policies (only three brands scored zero). child labour in the facilities where their Of the 26 supplier policies, 36 brands clothes are made. are publishing 18 of these policies. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 32 2. GOVERNANCE APPROACH

Who in the company is Employee and responsible for social and Supplier incentives environmental impacts? Finally, we looked to see if brands In this section, we were looking for the are disclosing how their employees name and role of the person with lead beyond the sustainability/CSR responsibility in the brand for social team (designers, buyers, sourcing and environmental performance. We managers, etc.) are incentivised also scored brands on whether they (through performance targets or published the direct contact details bonuses) to achieve improvements in for this person, or at least contact social and environmental impacts. details for a relevant department such as the sustainability/CSR team. We also looked for the same sort of incentives (such as long-term sourcing We also looked for the name of a commitments) tied to suppliers’ social board member or board committee and environmental improvements. who is responsible for social and environmental issues and how their oversight is implemented. This is typically the remit of an Ethics or Sustainability Committee at board level. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 33

2. GOVERNANCE

0-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% 41-50% 51-60% 61-70% 71-80% 81-90% 91-100%

Burlington 8 Asics Corporation 17 Benetton 25 Abercrombie & Fitch 33 Bershka 50 Burberry 58 ASOS 67 Bottega Veneta 75 Esprit 83 Marks & Spencer 100 Columbia Sportswear 8 Chanel 17 George at Asda 25 American Eagle 33 Massimo Dutti 50 Converse 58 Banana Republic 67 Gucci 75 Hugo Boss 83 Adidas 92 Costco 8 Matalan 17 JCPenney 25 Calzedonia 33 Pull&Bear 50 Jordan 58 Gap 67 YSL 75 Tesco 83 Reebok 92 Giorgio Armani 8 New Balance 17 Mango 25 Chico’s 33 Zara 50 Nike 58 Old Navy 67 C&A 75 Guess 8 Renner 17 Monsoon 25 Louis Vuitton 33 Champion 42 Dillard’s 58 H&M 67 Gildan Activewear 75 J.Crew 8 Under Armour 25 Uniqlo 33 Hanes 42 Next 58 Calvin Klein 67 Puma 75 Kohl's 8 Walmart 33 COACH 42 Target 58 Tommy Hilfiger 67 LOFT 8 Ermenegildo Zegna 42 The North Face 58 Levi Strauss & Co 67 Miu Miu 8 Hudson's Bay 42 Timberland 58 Prada 8 Sak's Fifth Avenue 42 Wrangler 58 New Look 8 Jack & Jones 42 TJ Maxx 58 Nordstrom 8 Lululemon 42 Zalando 58 Ross Stores 8 Topshop 42 Aéropostale 0 Amazon 0 Anthropologie 0 Urban Outfitters 0 Claire's Accessories 0 Dior 0 Express 0 Forever 21 0 Heilan Home 0 Hermès 0 Lacoste 0 Lands End 0 LL Bean 0 Macy's 0 Mexx 0 Michael Kors 0 Neiman Marcus 0 Pernambucanas 0 Primark 0 Ralph Lauren 0 Russell Athletic 0 s.Oliver 0 Triumph 0 Victoria's Secret 0

CAN YOU GET IN TOUCH?

64 brands publish contact 43 brands disclose 15 brands disclose contact 12 brands publish contact details for sustainability/ name/role of individual details for this person details specifically CSR department with lead responsibility for enquiries about on their websites their supplier lists

ACCOUNTABILITY PURCHASING PRACTICES

51 brands publish board 39 describe how Only 7 brands disclose incentives 26 brands disclose incentives level responsibility board accountabilty is tied to improvements in human rights tied to improvements in human implemented in practice and environmental performance for rights and environmental staff beyond sustainability team performance for suppliers FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 35 2. GOVERNANCE IMPLICATIONS

Management and Few real incentives for As explained by the Ethical Trading board level responsibility employees or suppliers Initiative, brands’ "practices such to create change as last-minute changes to orders If you wanted to find out more about the and ever-shorter lead times can social and environmental practices of When it comes to other company staff contribute to excessive overtime, the brands in this Index, you might find — designers, buyers, merchandisers, increased use of casual labour, and it difficult to know whom to contact. etc. — only seven brands are disclosing even unauthorised sub-contracting. whether employee performance or And pressure from retailers to reduce It may seem a simple ask but 36 incentives (bonuses or other rewards) prices can make it difficult for of the 100 brands do not publish an are tied to social and environmental suppliers to pay workers a living wage.” email address or phone number impacts. Generally speaking, it’s so that people can contact the difficult to tell whether anyone other Many brands talk about training sustainability or CSR team directly. than the brands’ board of directors staff and suppliers on social and This means over one-third of the and the sustainability/CSR team environmental issues. However, if brands aren’t easy to get in touch are held accountable for human brands truly want to make a positive with should you want to know more rights and environmental protection. change, they should be publicising how about how their products are made, Meanwhile, roughly one-quarter (26%) they are incentivising changes at each by whom and under what conditions. of brands report how they incentivise stage of the product’s creation from their suppliers to make social and designing more sustainable products Just over half of the brands (51%) environmental improvements. to sourcing better materials to better publish the name of a board level purchasing practices and rewarding committee that is responsible responsible suppliers with more for sustainability and ethics orders or better terms of business. issues, but only 39% describe how this works in practice. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 36 3. TRACEABILITY APPROACH

Are brands publishing lists of their suppliers Disclosing factories, processing facilities and how detailed is this information? and raw material suppliers

This section focused on whether brands are We looked for supplier lists at three levels. publishing lists of their suppliers and what level of First, are brands disclosing the factories where their detail brands are disclosing about these suppliers. clothes are made — e.g. the facilities that brands have a direct relationship with and typically do the cutting, sewing and final trims of products? For example, are brands sharing information Second, are brands disclosing processing facilities such as: further down the supply chain — e.g. from ginning and spinning, through to sub-contractors, wet • The address of the facility processing, embroidering, printing, finishing, • The types of products/services made in each dye-houses, laundries, and so on? And finally, supplier facility; are brands disclosing their suppliers of raw • Approximate number of workers; materials — e.g. primary substances such as • Gender breakdown of workers; fibres, hides, rubber, dyes, metals and so on? • % of migrant or contract workers; We gave extra points if supplier lists are • Date of last audit made available in a searchable format, cover more than 95% of their suppliers and have been updated within the past 12 months. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 37

3. TRACEABILITY

0-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% 41-50% 51-60% 61-70% 71-80% 81-90% 91-100%

Russell Athletic 9 Target 19 H&M 29 Adidas 34 Banana Republic 44 Abercrombie & Fitch 1 Benetton 14 Hermès 29 Reebok 34 Gap 44 American Eagle 1 Champion 13 Levi Strauss & Co 27 Converse 32 Old Navy 44 Bottega Veneta 1 Hanes 13 ASOS 26 Jordan 32 Gucci 1 George at Asda 13 Puma 26 Nike 32 YSL 1 Uniqlo 13 Esprit 22 Burberry 1 Bershka 12 Marks & Spencer 22 Calvin Klein 1 Massimo Dutti 12 Tommy Hilfiger 1 Pull&Bear 12 COACH 1 Zara 12 Gildan Activewear 1 C&A 12 Giorgio Armani 1 Columbia Sportswear 12 Hugo Boss 1 Lululemon 12 Kohl's 1 New Balance 12 LOFT 1 Hudson's Bay 11 Macy's 1 Sak's Fifth Avenue 11 Michael Kors 1 Tesco 11 Monsoon 1 The North Face 11 Next 1 Timberland 11 Primark 1 Wrangler 11 Ralph Lauren 1 Aéropostale 0 Amazon 0 Anthropologie 0 Urban Outfitters 0 Asics Corporation 0 Burlington 0 Calzedonia 0 Chanel 0 Chico’s 0 Claire's Accessories 0 Costco 0 Dillard’s 0 Dior 0 Ermenegildo Zegna 0 Express 0 Forever 21 0 Guess 0 Heilan Home 0 JCPenney 0 J.Crew 0 Jack & Jones 0 Lacoste 0 Lands End 0 LL Bean 0 Louis Vuitton 0 Mango 0 Matalan 0 Mexx 0 Miu Miu 0 Prada 0 Neiman Marcus 0 New Look 0 Nordstrom 0 Pernambucanas 0 Renner 0 Ross Stores 0 s.Oliver 0 TJ Maxx 0 Topshop 0 Triumph 0 Under Armour 0 Victoria's Secret 0 Walmart 0 Zalando 0

WHO’S PUBLISHING LISTS (TIER 1)?

32 brands are publishing 26 include the 13 include the types of 11 include approximate 5 include gender breakdown 3 publish the facility suppliers lists (which facility address products made in the facility number of workers of workers in each facility phone number or email covers at least tier 1) in each facility

WHO'S PUBLISHING BEYOND TIER 1?

28 make this list available 12 disclose that this 24 have updated their 14 brands publish 9 include the 0 brands are publishing in a searchable format list covers overs 95% supplier list at least in processing facilities facility address suppliers of raw material of their facilities the past 12 months FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 39 3. TRACEABILITY IMPLICATIONS

Publishing supplier lists with 10 of these brands include both the Getting a clearer idea of “The growing number of apparel increasing level of detail factories where their garments are cut, #whomademyclothes industry leaders disclosing factories sewn and trimmed (known as tier 1) is good news for workers, the Since April 2016 several brands have and their facilities where garments are Brands publish supplier lists with industry, and consumers,” says Aruna published their supplier lists. Marks & printed, dyed, finished or otherwise varying degrees of detail. Some brands Kashyap, senior women’s rights Spencer has launched an interactive processed in an earlier stage of simply publish the name and country counsel at Human Rights Watch. map of its suppliers in both food and production (known as tier 2). Adidas, where their factories are located. clothing, which spans 53 countries Reebok, Gap, Banana Republic, Old Over 80% of the brands publishing “Brands that do not disclose are and covers 1,229 factories employing Navy, H&M, Hermès, Levi Strauss, Puma supplier lists (tier 1) include a location/ holding out on a critical tool that 787,331 workers. ASOS has published and Target are disclosing suppliers address of the facility and less than can promote worker rights. They a list of its own-brand suppliers, beyond tier 1. Bershka, Massimo half of those disclose what types of should stop making excuses.” and Uniqlo revealed the names and Dutti, Pull & Bear, Zara publish a list products are made in each facility. We will be joining other NGOs and addresses of 146 of its core factory of their wet processing facilities but unions in encouraging more brands partners. In the past year Benetton, not a list of their manufacturers. Some brands publish a portion of C&A, Esprit, Gap, and VF Corporation their factories but not a complete to publish their supplier lists with (which owns more than 20 brands No one is publishing a list of raw list (e.g. Uniqlo just publishes greater level of detail. We would including The North Face, Timberland, material suppliers, so there is no its core factory partners). hope that consumers will ask Vans and Wrangler) have each way of knowing where their cotton, brands to publish these lists too. Brands tend to update their supplier disclosed the names and addresses wool, leather or other fibres come lists annually. However, Target says Publishing supplier lists is important, of the factories that manufacture their from or who produce them. it updates its list quarterly and ASOS but what we do with these lists will clothing around the world. Last year we says it will do so every two months. become imperative for creating real surveyed 40 big fashion companies positive change. The next step is to and only five were publishing supplier focus on ensuring these supplier lists lists. This year 32 of 100 brands are are most useful for consumers, NGOS, publishing supplier lists (tier 1). unions and workers themselves. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 40 4. KNOW, SHOW & FIX APPROACH

How are brands assessing the Know Show Fix implementation of its policies? Do they share the results of How do brands go about assessing We looked at whether brands are Finally, we looked at what brands these assessments? suppliers to make sure they’re disclosing the results of their supplier are publishing about how they meeting their policies? We looked assessments, either as a summary fix problems in factories when for a description of brands’ supplier of issues found in factories or at a discovered through the assessment assessment processes (typically more granular level (e.g. disclosing process. How do brands remediate We awarded extra points factory audits). findings by individual factory). issues, and what do they do with if brands disclosed: outstanding orders when problems are being addressed or are not fixed • The decision-making process at all? Do brands have confidential for taking on new suppliers; whistleblowing procedures in place • How frequently assessments are for both its own employees and for conducted (e.g. every 12 months); workers? Are brands disclosing the • How many assessments are results of these efforts to fix problems announced in advance verses found in factories (typically, these surprise factory visits; are called Corrective Action Plans)? • How many assessments are double-checked for accuracy; • And whether assessments include worker representatives, unions or labour rights NGOs. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 41

4. KNOW, SHOW & FIX

0-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% 41-50% 51-60% 61-70% 71-80% 81-90% 91-100%

Columbia Sportswear 9 Burberry 20 Bershka 31 Adidas 39 Victoria's Secret 9 Calvin Klein 19 Massimo Dutti 31 Reebok 39 Amazon 8 Tommy Hilfiger 19 Pull&Bear 31 H&M 37 Chico’s 8 Macy's 19 Zara 31 Marks & Spencer 37 Pernambucanas 8 Abercrombie & Fitch 17 COACH 28 Banana Republic 36 Triumph 8 Lululemon 17 Tesco 28 Gap 36 Anthropologie 7 Topshop 17 Esprit 27 Old Navy 36 Urban Outfitters 7 Asics Corporation 16 Primark 27 Puma 36 Ross Stores 7 Champion 16 Russell Athletic 25 C&A 33 Neiman Marcus 5 Hanes 16 Target 25 Burlington 4 Converse 16 Uniqlo 25 Claire's Accessories 4 Jordan 16 Costco 24 Ermenegildo Zegna 4 Nike 16 George at Asda 24 New Balance 4 Lands End 16 Hudson's Bay 24 Express 3 Next 16 Sak's Fifth Avenue 24 Giorgio Armani 3 Renner 16 Bottega Veneta 23 Miu Miu 3 ASOS 15 Gucci 23 Prada 3 Guess 15 YSL 23 Monsoon 3 JCPenney 15 Gildan Activewear 23 Ralph Lauren 3 LOFT 15 The North Face 23 Forever 21 1 Nordstrom 15 Timberland 23 Hermès 1 Aéropostale 13 Wrangler 23 LL Bean 1 Calzedonia 13 Levi Straus & Co 21 Matalan 1 Kohl's 13 Walmart 21 Mexx 1 Michael Kors 13 Chanel 0 TJ Maxx 13 Dior 0 American Eagle 12 Heilan Home 0 Benetton 12 Lacoste 0 Dillard’s 12 Louis Vuitton 0 Hugo Boss 12 s.Oliver 0 J.Crew 12 Mango 12 Under Armour 12 Zalando 12 Jack & Jones 11 New Look 11

SUPPLIER ASSESSMENTS

45 brands disclose their Only 12 brands are disclosing 30 brands disclose how many 24 brands describe involving 84 brands disclose 55 brands disclose how assessment process and general assessment findings supplier assessments are unions, worker representatives information about their frequently assessments general findings at tier 1 for facilities beyond tier 1 announced vs. surprise visits or labour rights NGOs in supplier assessment process are conducted these assessments

ADDRESSING PROBLEMS

Only 12 brands disclose how 77 brands disclose a 43 brands disclose a 29 brands include the 19 brands disclose how 23 brands disclose how many many factory assessments whistleblowing procedure grievance mechanism grievance mechanism in the workers are informed about of their factories have are checked for accuracy for employees process for suppliers Supplier Code of Conduct this grievance mechanism Corrective Action Plans in place and workers FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 43 4. KNOW, SHOW & FIX IMPLICATIONS

Brands focused on knowing "Despite the hundreds of thousands Less than half the brands (45%) publish However, only 21 of these signatory but not showing or fixing of social compliance audits summarised findings of their factory brands publish their supplier lists, conducted each year to ensure assessments, 23% of brands disclose so you can cross check to see The vast majority of brands (84%) minimum workplace conditions in the number of their factories that are what progress is happening in their describe having established factory companies’ supply chains, there is undergoing Corrective Action Plans Bangladesh factories – although this assessment procedures in place. little evidence that they alone have (CAP), an industry term that describes would take you significant time and Factory audits seem to be most brands’ led to sustained improvements in the process of identifying failures in effort to cross check yourself. H&M is main tool for assessing and managing many social performance issues, factories and coming up with a plan to the only brand that is publishing each social and environmental issues. such as working hours, overtime, wage fix them. Disclosing audit information of their factories individual ratings levels and freedom of association,” and Corrective Action Plans helps (Platinum, Gold, Silver or Other). However, audits have faced widespread argues Shift, the leading centre of everyone understand what progress criticism by NGOs in recent years. The expertise on the UN Guiding Principles is or isn’t being made to improve We believe that disclosing actual Ethical Trading Initiative has said that: on Business and Human Rights. conditions in supplier facilities. This audit information is crucial to driving “Time and again, audits fail to reveal is a crucial component of both the change, but it needs to be done in a true picture of what conditions are In other words: audits help diagnose, Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety a clear and understandable way. like. Most audits represent a snapshot but they don't cure. Audits can also be and the Bangladesh Accord on Fire and We would like to see wider of a given point in time - in other vulnerable to deception – falsifying Building Safety programmes, which disclosure of assessment findings words, they don't show the situation information, double books, bribes and publish inspection reports deliberately and remediation efforts, or at least before or after an audit. Not only that, coaching workers for interviews, which as an incentive for factories to more disclosure on the real-world standard audit methodologies rarely you can read more about in this report improve safety conditions in a timely effects of brands’ efforts to manage allow for digging deep to discover from Traidcraft. If audit information is manner and to ensure that safety and improve working conditions. the root causes of workers' rights made public and could be contested, findings are properly addressed. 45 violations, or for assessing the risk of this may be motivation not to falsify of the brands included in the Fashion future violations. For example, a typical information in the first place. Transparency Index are signatories audit may reveal the existence of of these initiatives and therefore child labour, but it will not identify the only their Bangladeshi factories and reasons why children are working.” remediation efforts are disclosed. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 44 5. SPOTLIGHT ISSUES APPROACH

The Spotlight Issues were selected Money – Living Wages Fashion – Business Model Power – Unionisation to align with Fashion Revolution’s & Consumption of Resources & Collective Bargaining 2017 theme: Money, Fashion, Power. Have brands made public Throughout our advocacy efforts this commitments to pay living wages We wanted to see if companies are Most brands have policies on Freedom year we have put the lens on the across the supply chain? We gave publishing anything that addresses of Association and the Right to Organise, flows of money, pricing and wages, points to brands that have made a the problem of overconsumption. but we wanted to see if brands are and imbalances of power through commitment to pay living wages only This isn’t an easy topic to measure. disclosing more about what this looks fashion’s supply chains. The Spotlight if they have disclosed a methodology, like in practice. We looked to see if Issues will change each year. benchmark or process for achieving brands were publishing the number living wages (e.g. through collective We looked to see if brands are: of workers in its supply chain that are bargaining). Brands who have part of independent, democratically • Offering repair services in order signed up to Action, Collaboration, elected unions or covered by collective to make products last longer; Transformation (ACT) or the Fair Labor bargaining agreements. We also Association’s Fair Compensation • Reselling used clothing at looked to see if any information Strategy were awarded points. We also retail level; was provided on how workers are looked to see if brands are disclosing • Investing in circular resources informed of their right to join a union. progress towards meeting these and innovative technologies commitments. More on this later. that will help reduce resource consumption and waste; • Mapping social and/or environmental impacts directly into the company’s financial statements. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 45

5. SPOTLIGHT ISSUES

0-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% 41-50% 51-60% 61-70% 71-80% 81-90% 91-100%

Levi Strauss & Co 7 C&A 18 ASOS 29 Bershka 32 Marks & Spencer 50 Monsoon 7 Banana Republic 18 Hugo Boss 25 Massimo Dutti 32 New Look 50 Lululemon 4 Gap 18 Adidas 21 Pull&Bear 32 H&M 46 Abercrombie & Fitch 0 Old Navy 18 Reebok 21 Zara 32 Aéropostale 0 Gucci 18 Calvin Klein 21 Puma 32 Amazon 0 Primark 18 Tommy Hilfiger 21 American Eagle 0 Target 18 Converse 21 Anthropologie 0 Bottega Veneta 14 Jordan 21 Urban Outfitters 0 YSL 14 Nike 21 Benetton 0 Champion 14 Gildan Activewear 21 Burlington 0 Hanes 14 Topshop 21 Calzedonia 0 Esprit 14 Chanel 0 New Balance 14 Chico’s 0 Next 14 Claire's Accessories 0 Russell Athletic 14 COACH 0 Tesco 14 Columbia Sportswear 0 Under Armour 14 Costco 0 Uniqlo 14 Dillard’s 0 Asics Corporation 11 Dior 0 Burberry 11 Ermenegildo Zegna 0 Express 0 Forever 21 0 George at Asda 0 Giorgio Armani 0 Guess 0 Heilan Home 0 Hermès 0 Hudson's Bay 0 Sak's Fifth Avenue 0 JCPenney 0 J.Crew 0 Jack & Jones 0 Kohl's 0 Lacoste 0 Lands End 0 LL Bean 0 LOFT 0 Louis Vuitton 0 Macy's 0 Mango 0 Matalan 0 Mexx 0 Michael Kors 0 Miu Miu 0 Prada 0 Neiman Marcus 0 Nordstrom 0 Pernambucanas 0 Ralph Lauren 0 Renner 0 Ross Stores 0 s.Oliver 0 The North Face 0 Timberland 0 Wrangler 0 TJ Maxx 0 Triumph 0 Victoria's Secret 0 Walmart 0 Zalando 0

SNAPSHOT OF FINDINGS

34 brands have made But only 5 brands disclose how 16 brands describe training Only 4 brands report progress commitments to paying the company’s purchasing suppliers on efficiency and towards paying living wages to living wages to workers practices enable the productivity, which could help workers in the supply chain in the supply chain payment of a living wage improve wages in theory

Only 3 brands say that 14 brands report investments 11 brands map social and Only 6 brands disclose how many they offer repair services, in circular resources or environmental impacts into of their supplier facilities have extending the life of products technologies towards their financial statement independent, democratically reducing consumption elected unions in place FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 47 5. SPOTLIGHT ISSUES IMPLICATIONS

Commitments to collective collective bargaining agreements. Several brands (ASOS, C&A, Esprit, Only H&M, Marks & Spencer, New Look bargaining and living wages H&M, Bershka/Massimo Dutti/Pull & and Puma are disclosing the progress H&M and Inditex (Bershka, Massimo Bear/Zara, New Look, Next, Primark, towards achieving living wages for Many countries have legal minimum Dutti, Pull & Bear, Zara) have signed Target, Tesco, Topshop) have recently workers in the supply chain. Two wages but this is often far below a Global Framework Agreements with joined ACT (Action, Collaboration, brands (H&M and Marks & Spencer) rate which enables workers to support IndustriALL Global Union, which Transformation), an initiative between publish a policy to pay suppliers on themselves and their family. Collective represents 50 million workers in 140 international brands and retailers, time, and only five brands publish bargaining, meaning negotiations countries in the mining, energy and and trade unions to address the information about how their purchasing on the terms and conditions of manufacturing sectors. The Agreement issue of living wages in the textile practices enable the payment of living employment between workers and with Inditex covers over a million and garment supply chain. ACT "aims wages, such as long-term purchase employers, is essential to ensuring garment workers in more than 6,000 to improve wages in the industry commitments with their suppliers or improved wages, better working supplier factories worldwide and by establishing industry collective ensuring that costs paid to suppliers conditions and sustainable livelihoods. sets out how the company will work bargaining in key garment and textile are enough to cover living wages. with IndustriALL to review Freedom of sourcing countries, supported by world According to IndustriALL Global Association and the Right to Bargain class manufacturing standards and Much more needs to be done and Union, over 90% of workers in the Collectively across its supply chains. responsible purchasing practices.” faster by brands to ensure that workers, global garment industry have no The Agreement with H&M covers 1.6 We believe that every brand should from farm to retail, are paid fairly. This possibility to negotiate their wages million workers across 1,900 factories be signing up to ACT as a minimum means brands urgently need to look and conditions. Furthermore, foreign and promises to work towards step towards ensuring workers are at their own business models and and migrant workers, homeworkers, improved worker and employer able to negotiate for better conditions purchasing practices. Currently, brands sub-contractors, farmers and those dialogue at the suppliers producing for and living wages, meaning that are not widely disclosing their efforts who work part time or are contract H&M. This has reportedly led to several they can afford a decent standard to address either of these issues. labourers in the supply chain have new factory level unions registered, of living with some discretionary the least bargaining power since but this progress remains "fragile." income wherever they live in the they have indirect relationships world. Since ACT is still relatively Topshop requires its suppliers to with the brands. These workers new, progress has yet to be seen. often don’t even know who exactly sign a Right to Organise Guarantee employs them (source: WIEGO). that is intended to ensure that 34 of the brands have made some form workers’ Freedom of Association of public commitment to work towards 12% of brands disclose the number of rights are clearly communicated paying living wages to supply chain workers in their supply chain that are and understood by all workers. workers, but only four are reporting any part of independent, democratically progress against this commitment. elected unions or covered by FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 48 5. SPOTLIGHT ISSUES IMPLICATIONS

The scale of production Monsoon has a slightly different is immense model of production by which some of their products are made by smaller Brands are producing an eye-popping producers and workshops. Through this number of products each year. Inditex model, Monsoon produces over 300,000 (who owns Bershka, Massimo Dutti, artisan made products annually, Pull & Bear, and Zara) reports having sourced from more than 1,500 artisans. produced 1.17 billion products in 2015 (across all of their eight brands) The sheer scale of production and made by 1,725 direct suppliers with consumption is a cause for concern, 6,298 factories in 50 countries. considering its environmental impact. While a few brands report initiatives Esprit produced nearly 100 It can take over 700 95% of the clothes North Americans to collect, recycle or donate used gallons of water to make throw away into landfills each year million items last year. clothing, overall brands do not disclose just one cotton T-shirt could be reused or recycled many substantive efforts to address [source: Value Village] [source: Value Village] H&M Group reports having more than the problem of overconsumption. 161,000 employees, 4,300 stores globally across 64 markets, and works with Only three brands — Burberry, Gucci approximately 820 suppliers and 1,900 and Levi Strauss — are promoting repair factories, employing an estimated 1.6 services in order to extend the life of its million workers in the supply chain. products, while just 14 brands disclose investments in circular resources Adidas (including Reebok) works with the aim of keeping materials in with 1,079 factories in 61 countries. perpetual use and out of landfills. Only 11 brands are disclosing steps George at ASDA clothing is made in to integrate social and environmental factories in more than 60 countries. impacts into their financial model Even luxury brands are producing in order to steer business decisions at a large scale; for example based on more than just profits. The carbon emissions generated In 2016, it is estimated that 150 billion in 2015 Gucci conducted 1,120 by the clothing of the average items of clothing are delivered out household in the UK is equivalent audits on 659 suppliers. of factories annually worldwide, to driving 6,000 miles in a car a rise from 80 billion in 2012

[source: WRAP] [source: Materials Systems Laboratory, MIT] FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 49 VIEWPOINT

Fashion Revolution once Research has consistently shown Sustainable supply chains require that an organized and empowered sustainable sourcing practices. again has provided an workforce is often the most effective The price brands pay to produce their important contribution and democratic way to address many garments should cover the costs violations. Yet, Fashion Revolution’s of living wages and safe buildings, to efforts to address findings indicate that most brands and the lead times brands allot sweatshop practices with its are not disclosing information to make their goods should allow DR. MARK ANNER Fashion Transparency Index. about unionization and collective for reasonable hours of work and DIRECTOR, CENTER FOR GLOBAL bargaining agreements. In far too reduced work intensity. Such good WORKERS’ RIGHTS The Index is an eloquent reminder of many countries, workers are often practices must extend through PENN STATE UNIVERSITY how much work remains to be done dismissed or threatened when trying the entire supply chain, from tier 1 in the industry. Far too many workers to organize unions, raise wages, and factories to home work. still face unacceptable conditions establish more stable work. Many of work in apparel supply chains, problems are the result of employer "the time has including forced and excessive abuses and weak local governance. overtime, unsafe buildings, and come for brands subpar wages that do not cover Yet, significant problems are the and retailers to basic living expenses. result of sourcing practices that start make their entire at the top of global supply chains. This includes a worrisome pattern of supply chains reducing the price paid to produce transparent" apparel and shortening the time allotted to make and ship items. Such As Fashion Revolution's effort a price squeeze contributes to low indicates, the time has come for wages and unsafe buildings. And the brands and retailers to make their lead time squeeze engenders forced entire supply chains transparent. overtime and increased worker The time has also come to establish production quotas. sourcing practices that are conducive to the human development and empowerment of the workers who work so hard every day to make the clothes we wear. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 50

WHAT SHOULD YOU DO WITH THIS INFORMATION?

To download the full spreadsheet of results, click here. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 51

CITIZENS To encourage brands to do more, you can take action in two ways:

Encourage more public disclosure from brands. You can do this by using social media to ask brands #whomademyclothes and by supporting campaigns that call We hope the Fashion Transparency We hope that the Fashion Transparency for brands to publish their supplier Index inspires people to ask Index inspires us to think differently lists and supply chain information; brands #whomademyclothes about the clothes we buy and wear. We demanding greater transparency. hope it inspires more people to scrutinise the brands they buy and to consider At the moment none of us have enough how clothes might have been made, Write or call policymakers and information about where and how our where, by whom, under what conditions clothes are made. We have the right to and at what true cost. We hope this ask them to do two things: know that our money is not supporting research activates you to try to find out — To implement regulation ensuring brands exploitation, human rights abuses and more about the production processes are responsible for the impact they have environmental destruction. There is no and people behind what you wear. way to hold brands and governments on the lives of the people working in their to account if we can’t see what is truly supply chains, at home and abroad; happening behind the scenes. This is why transparency is essential. — Require brands to report transparently about their social and environmental impacts across the entire value chain using a common framework.

Find out how to get involved in the campaign: www.fashionrevolution.org/get-involved FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 52

BRANDS AND We ask brands and retailers to take RETAILERS immediate, concrete steps to:

Disclose your supplier lists in a searchable format and publish more easy-to-understand information about your social and environmental performance, progress and impacts across the

We hope the Fashion Transparency 2016 entire supply chain; Index influences brands and retailers to publish more information about 12.5% their policies, practices and progress of 40 on human rights and sustainability. companies Improve sustainability/CSR communications — were publishing make relevant information easier to find and This year 32% of the 100 brands we supplier surveyed are publishing supplier lists more simple to understand; lists (tier 1). We are beginning to see increased disclosure. We hope that the Fashion Transparency Index influences more brands to disclose Publish direct contact details for the their supplier lists with increasingly 2017 sustainability/CSR department on your website; detailed information — answering the question #whomademyclothes. 32% We hope the Fashion Transparency of 100 brands were Answer your customers' #whomademyclothes Index also sheds some light on how publishing requests on social media with specific different brands are communicating supplier lists supplier information, not just your policies. their sustainability/CSR initiatives, (tier 1) highlighting where best practices and areas for improvement are emerging. We think it might be interesting for brands and retailers to see how they compare to each other in terms of public disclosure of supply chain information and social and environmental priorities. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 53

GOVERNMENTS AND We ask that governments POLICYMAKERS and policymakers take action in several key ways:

Better implement and enforce existing laws that are meant to protect workers and the environment everywhere; Fashion Revolution believes that The UK Modern Slavery Act and laws and regulations are key to California’s Transparency in Supply transforming the fashion industry. Chains Act require companies to disclose their efforts to eradicate Legislate and support transparency — There are plenty of international human trafficking and slavery from i.e. mandatory due diligence and standards set by the United Nations and their supply chains. Last year President related bodies such as the International Obama signed into law a provision standardised disclosure by brands on Labor Organisation, and many countries banning the import of goods made by social and environmental issues; actually have living wages, workers child and forced labour into the U.S. The rights and environmental protections European Union is currently discussing a written into their Constitutions. number of measures that would legally require companies to carry out risk- Make companies and their executives at However, enforcement of existing assessments across their supply chains. laws is often absent, implementation home accountable for what happens in the is weak and there is little opportunity We hope the Fashion Transparency company’s supply chains, regardless of to address violations though the Index helps to demonstrate the need for whether the company has direct control or courts. This needs to change. mandatory due diligence and reporting. We would also like to see governments where in the world abuses may be happening. Transparency is beginning to make companies and their executives become subject to legislation. legally responsible for what happens in France requires companies to report the company’s supply chains, regardless annually on environmental, social of whether the company has direct and corporate governance issues. control or where in the world abuses may be happening. Your constituents deserve to know that the clothes they buy and wear have not contributed to exploitation and environmental degradation. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 54

NGOS, UNIONS We encourage NGOs and unions to: AND WORKERS

Join us in encouraging brands to publish supplier lists and more detailed supply chain information;

Join us in asking policymakers for mandatory

We hope that the Fashion Transparency due diligence and standardised reporting; Index is useful for NGOs, trade unions and civil society groups who are working directly with producers and Support our call for citizens to ask supply chain workers on human rights and environmental protection. brands #whomademyclothes.

This research helps NGOs, unions and workers to understand what brands are publishing supplier lists, what information Please send us information about is being disclosed, where brands how you would like to see the fashion are producing and what policies and procedures brands say they have in place industry improve. Let’s work together! to protect workers and the environment. There are many pioneering NGOs working directly on the ground in producing countries, and we hope this information Fashion Revolution commits to supporting can help them keep brands accountable complementary campaign efforts by other for what happens in their supply chains, NGOs, unions and workers, wherever possible. wherever production is based. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 55 AN IMPORTANT FINAL NOTE

We are not endorsing the brands Fashion Revolution encourages you to included in the Fashion Transparency use your voice, your money and your "Now, in the Index, regardless of how they score. power to transform the fashion industry. By conducting this research, we are not promoting the fast fashion Read our booklet hyper-connected business model, which underpins ‘How To Be a Fashion Revolutionary’ many of the brands included in the to find out what more you can do. Fashion Transparency Index. and ever evolving Be Curious. Find Out. world, transparency Do Something.

Finally, we ask you to please is the new power share this report with anyone you think might be interested.

BENJAMIN HERZBERG PRIVATE SECTOR ENGAGEMENT FOR GOOD GOVERNANCE, WORLD BANK INSTITUTE FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 56

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

To download the full spreadsheet of results, click here. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 57 THANK YOU!

The Fashion Transparency Index report We would like to say a special thanks was written by Sarah Ditty, who leads on to Dr Mark Anner, Subindu Garkhel Finally, we would like to Fashion Revolution’s policy and advocacy and Jenny Holdcroft for your important efforts. It was designed by Heather written contributions to this report thank all of you for reading Knight, Fashion Revolution’s lead on and to the rest of our consultation branding and communications, the committee: Neil Brown, Ian Cook, this report and supporting person who is responsible for giving our Dr Alessandra Mezzadri and Heather Fashion Revolution. movement its visual identity. Research Webb. An absolutely enormous thank was led by Sarah Ditty and Carry you to all the others who provided Somers, the co-founder and Global informal feedback on the methodology Please consider donating financially Operations Director of Fashion Revolution and report — you know who you are! — a huge thanks for their diligent efforts. to Fashion Revolution so that A very heartfelt thanks to our brilliant As always, huge thanks to the we can continue to create more research assistants, without whom this members of Fashion Revolution’s report would not have been possible — Global Coordinating Team — resources, such as the Fashion Eloisa Artuso, Sophia Calugay, Ilishio Orsola de Castro, Ian Cook, Sarah Ditty, Lovejoy, Aidan Shaw, Sienna Somers Roxanne Houshmand-Howell, Heather Transparency Index, and spark an and Manon Thomas. Thanks to Martine Knight, Martine Parry, Lucy Shea, even wider global conversation Parry for helping us reach out to press. Carry Somers and Jocelyn Whipple. about the impacts of our clothes. Thank you to the brands and their Thanks to Nikki Mattei for keeping representatives who took the time to our team in running order. Thanks to engage with us and complete the 2017 all of Fashion Revolution’s Country With your help, we can research questionnaire. We know that Coordinators, who brilliantly and create positive change! brands receive frequent requests for effectively power the movement. information from civil society and NGOs, Thanks to Fashion Revolution’s and it’s difficult to respond to them all Global Advisory Committee for their DONATE: www.fashionrevolution.org/support-us and still get work done. Your participation enthusiasm and collaboration. is both vital and appreciated. Thank you to C&A Foundation for your generous support. FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 58 ANNEX 1: DEFINITIONS & ABBREVIATIONS

Auditing is the process of reviewing a Grievance mechanism is a complaint Remediation is the action of fixing company's finances, working conditions, process that can be used by workers, something, particularly reversing or and environmental practices. It uncovers allowing them to voice concerns about stopping environmental damage or human risks to workers' safety and opportunities to working conditions without fear of rights abuses. A Corrective Action Plan is an improve working conditions. punishment or retribution. agreement with a supplier on what needs (Source: Walk Free Foundation) (Source: Verité) to be remedied, when it is to be done, and who is responsible for which tasks. (Source: ETI Norway) CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) is a Living wage is a wage a worker earns in a corporation’s initiatives to assess and take standard working week that is enough to responsibility for the company's effects provide for them and their family's basic Purchasing practices refers to a on environmental and social wellbeing. needs - including food, housing, clothing, company’s process of buying goods and The term generally applies to efforts that education and healthcare. services. This might include activities such go beyond what may be required by law. (Source: Clean Clothes Campaign) as planning and forecasting, design and (Source: Investopedia) development, cost negotiation, sourcing and placing orders, production management Materiality Assessment is an exercise and payment and terms. Collective bargaining is a process where designed to gather insights on the relative (Source: Better Buying) employers and unions negotiate to determine importance of specific environmental, social fair wages and working conditions. and governance (ESG) issues. The insight is (Source: ILO) most commonly used to inform sustainability Supply chain / value chain refers to reporting and strategic planning. all the steps it takes to produce and sell (Source: Greenbiz) a product, from farm to closet. Due diligence is a process through which (Source: OECD) companies assesses their impacts on human rights and the environment and then NGO (Non-governmental organisation) is a take actions to reduce any negative impacts. group that operates independently of any Wet processing facilities are involved (Source: United Nations Global Compact) government, typically one whose purpose in the production of clothing whose is to address a social or political issue. activities typically involve rinsing, (Source: Oxford Dictionary) bleaching, dyeing, printing, treating or Freedom of Association is the right of coating fabric and laundering. individuals and workers to form and join (Source: Garment Merchandising blog) groups of their own choosing in order to take collective action to pursue the interest of the members of the group. (Source: ILO) FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 59 ANNEX 2: REFERENCES

Human Rights Watch (September 2016) Gap Inc. Fast Retailing (February 2017) Uniqlo Core Partner Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety (2017) Arcadia Group (2015) Right to Organise Guarantee Joins Global Brands that Publish Factory List. Factory List. Retrieved: www.fastretailing.com/ Factory List and Inspection Reports. Retrieved: – English. Retrieved: s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws. Retrieved: www.hrw.org/news/2016/09/08/gap- eng/sustainability/business/policy.html#factory www.bangladeshworkersafety.org/factory/factory- com/craft-web-s3-2617/Arcadia-Right-to- inc-joins-global-brands-publish-factory-list list-inspection-reports Organise-Guarantee-2015-ENGLISH.pdf Benetton (2016) Supplier List. Retrieved: Business of Fashion (September 2016). www.benettongroup.com/sustainability/ Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh Value Village (2017) Rethink Reuse. Retrieved: The 10 Commandments of New Consumerism. sustainable-supply-chain (2015) Introduction to the Accord on Fire and www.valuevillage.com/rethinkreuse Limei Hoang: Author. Retrieved: Building Safety in Bangladesh. Retrieved: www.businessoffashion.com/articles/intelligence/ C&A (2015) Supplier Factory List. Retrieved: bangladeshaccord.org/about/ WRAP (May 2016) Valuing Our Clothes. Retrieved: the-10-commandments-of-new-consumerism materialimpacts.c-and-a.com/supplier-list/ www.wrap.org.uk/sustainable-textiles/ HiiL Innovating Justice (2017) ACT: Towards living valuing-our-clothes NYU / Stern Center For Business and Human Rights Esprit (2017) Esprit Supplier List. Retrieved: wages in global supply chains. Retrieved: (March 2017) Putting the ‘S’ in ESG: Measuring www.esprit.com/sustainability/our-strategy/ www.hiil.org/project/act-towards-living-wages- Material Systems Laboratory / MIT (October 2015) Human Rights Performance for Investors. global-presence in-global-supply-chains Sustainable Apparel Materials. Randolph Kirchain, Casey O’Connor, Sarah Labowitz: Authors. Elsa Olivetti, T Reed Miller and Suzanne Greene: Retrieved: bhr.stern.nyu.edu/statement/2017/3/8/ Gap (2017) Gap Inc Factory List. Retrieved: Fair Labor Association (2017) The FLA’s Fair Authors. Retrieved: msl.mit.edu/publications/ report-reveals-gaps-in-social-performance- www.gapincsustainability.com/people/improving- Compensation Strategy. Retrieved: www.fairlabor. SustainableApparelMaterials.pdf metrics-needed-by-investors-to-identify- factory-working-conditions/partnering-factories org/global-issues/fair-compensation leading-companies Fashion Revolution (April 2016) Fashion VF Corporation (2016) Global Supplier IndustriALL Global Union (May 2015) Industry Transparency Index 2016. Sarah Ditty and SOMO / Centre for Research on Multinational Factory List. Retrieved: bargaining is an essential tool in the fight for Bryony Moore: Authors. Retrieved: Corporations (February 2016). Fact sheet: Migrant responsiblesourcing.vfc.com/factories-list/ living wages. Jenny Holdcroft: Author. Retrieved: fashionrevolution.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ Labour in the textile and garment industry. www.industriall-union.org/special-report- FR_FashionTransparencyIndex.pdf A focus on the role of buying companies. Ethical Trading Initiative. Auditing Working industry-bargaining-is-an-essential-tool-in-the- Gisela ten Kate, Martje Theuws: Authors. Retrieved: Conditions. Retrieved: www.ethicaltrade.org/ fight-for-living-wages Government of the United Kingdom (March 2015) www.somo.nl/fact-sheet-migrant-labour-in-the- issues/auditing-working-conditions Modern Slavery Act 2015. Retrieved: textile-and-garment-industry/ WIEGO / Women in Informal Employment: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/30/contents/ Shift (2013) From Audit to Innovation: Advancing Globalizing & Organizing. Garment Workers. enacted Ethical Trading Initiative. Company purchasing Human Rights in Global Supply Chains. Retrieved: Retrieved: www.wiego.org/informal-economy/ practices. Retrieved: www.ethicaltrade.org/issues/ www.shiftproject.org/resources/publications/ occupational-groups/garment-workers United States Department of Labor (October 2010) company-purchasing-practices audit-to-innovation-advancing-human-rights- California Transparency in Supply Chains Act. global-supply-chains IndustriALL Global Union (July 2014) Retrieved: www.dol.gov/ilab/child-forced-labor/ Marks & Spencer (September 2016) Global Framework Agreement Between Inditex California-Transparency-in-Supply-Chains-Act.htm M&S supplier Map. Retrieved: Traidcraft (2008) Material Concerns: S.A. and IndustriALL Global Union. Retrieved: interactivemap.marksandspencer.com How responsible sourcing can deliver www.industriall-union.org/inditex Malo, Sebastien. (February 2016) With new the goods for business and workers in the law, U.S. takes on slavery by banning forced ASOS (March 2017) Sourcing Map. Retrieved: garment industry. Multiple authors. Retrieved: H&M Group (September 2016) H&M makes its labor imports. Reuters. Retrieved: www.reuters. www.asosplc.com/corporate-responsibility/ www.traidcraft.co.uk/resourcesearch Global Framework Agreement with IndustriALL com/article/us-usa-lawmaking-forcedlabor- our-products/sourcing-map and IF Metall permanent. Retrieved: idUSKCN0VX32A about.hm.com/en/media/news/general-2016/ hm-permanently-collaborates-with-industriall- and-ifmetall.html FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 60 CHECK OUT THESE TRANSPARENCY ORGANISATIONS FOR FURTHER IS NOT A CHOICE. RESEARCH: THE ONLY CHOICE IS, DOES IT HAPPEN TO YOU, OR DO YOU PARTICIPATE IN IT? Anti-Slavery International Please also visit www.workerdiaries.org to www.antislavery.org discover the Garment Worker Diaries, a yearlong "Transparency is not research study of the lives and wages of 600 Business & Human Rights Centre garment workers in Bangladesh, Cambodia https://business-humanrights.org and India, led by Microfinance Opportunities a choice. The only in collaboration with Fashion Revolution and Centre for Sustainable Fashion supported by C&A Foundation. http://sustainable-fashion.com choice is, does it — ALEX BOGUSKY — Clean Clothes Campaign happen to you, or do https://cleanclothes.org

Greenpeace you participate in it? www.greenpeace.org

Human Rights Watch www.hrw.org

Labour Behind the Label ALEX BOGUSKY http://labourbehindthelabel.org

International Labor Rights Forum www.laborrights.org

Mistra Future Fashion http://mistrafuturefashion.com

The Centre for Research on Multinational Corporation (SOMO) www.somo.nl FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 61 ABOUT FASHION REVOLUTION

Fashion Revolution is a global movement who "Transparency is a want to radically change the way fashion is made, sourced and consumed. We believe in tool to continuously an industry that values people, the environment, put under scrutiny creativity and profit in equal measure. We have teams in over 90 countries that want our sustainability- to see fashion become a force for good. driven theories, actions and their resulting effects www.fashionrevolution.org @Fash_Rev Fash_rev facebook.com/fashionrevolution.org SIMONETTA CARBONARO CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGIST AND PROFESSOR OF HUMANISTIC MARKETING FASHION REVOLUTION | FASHION TRANSPARENCY INDEX 2017 62