DOCSLIB.ORG

Phase 2 Community Engagement Summary Report HAIG PARK MASTERPLAN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phase 2 Community Engagement Summary Report HAIG PARK MASTERPLAN Phase 2 Community Engagement Summary Report HAIG PARK MASTERPLAN August 2017 Contents Executive summary 3 What the community told us 4 Engagement Process 5 Part 1: Community engagement summary 7 Part 2: Community comfort level with the draft design ideas 11 Part 3: Summary of comments per design idea 14 Appendix 26 Engagement summary by method 26 Online survey 26 Drop-in sessions 27 Email submissions 29 Discussion board comments 57 Workshop comments 73 Speaker series evaluation 74 Online survey 76 Structure of this report The executive summary provides a qualitative assessment of all the community feedback and provides key insights for the masterplan from this phase of community engagement. Part one provides an overview of the community engagement activities, purpose and timeline. Part two outlines the overall community comfort level with the draft designs. Part three provides a summary of the feedback we heard on the design ideas. Part four provides a detailed summary of comments by engagement method (online survey, drop-ins, email submissions, discussion board, workshop and speaker series). page 2 Haig Park Masterplan Development – Phase 2 Community Engagement Summary Executive summary In early 2017 the ACT Government began a process to develop a masterplan for Haig Park which aims to establish how Haig Park can be a more inviting and usable space while conserving and promoting its heritage significance. The community is contributing to developing the masterplan through a range of engagement activities over a number of different phases. This engagement process recognises the park as an important community asset which has significant interest for the Canberra community with a high heritage and historic value. It also recognises the community has significant experience, knowledge and expertise about the park which can contribute to the masterplan. Community engagement is being conducted over three stages. The first phase of community engagement, which occurred from January to March 2017, focused on understanding stakeholder and community views, issues and aspirations for the site. The second phase, which ran from May to June 2017, focused on testing and reviewing draft design ideas for the Haig Park Masterplan. Phase three, which is expected to occur in late 2017, will seek public feedback on the Draft Haig Park masterplan. This report documents the feedback received during the second phase of community engagement. The ideas and feedback we received in the first phase of engagement were used to develop draft themes, objectives and principles for the masterplan. From these, the architects created four key design ideas: Edges, Park Rooms, Activities and Pathways. (see the phase one community engagement summary report for more detail available at yoursay.act.gov.au/haigpark). The second phase of community engagement focused on testing the design ideas with the community. Over six and a half weeks from Wednesday 10 May 2017 to Friday 23 June, we heard from: • 252 people through an online survey • 74 people at one workshop • 62 people at three drop-in consultation sessions • Local community representative and stakeholder groups through individual meetings including with the Braddon Precinct, Turner Scouts Hall and North Canberra Community Council • 38 people via email submissions • 39 people via the online discussion board with 84 comments posted • 68 people at the Haig Park speakers series event We also made contact with over 400 people via our email subscription list and by directly approaching interested community groups. We ran Facebook advertising and put posters in local shops to ensure a wide range of people were informed of the process and how they could participate. page 3 Haig Park Masterplan Development – Phase 2 Community Engagement Summary What the community told us • Overall, the community is comfortable with the draft design ideas presented (edges, pathways, activities and park rooms) and the general direction of the masterplan (see comfort rating page 13). People suggested a range of additions to the designs, most of which went to a level of detail not addressed in this phase of engagement (e.g. surfaces of paths, design palette, locations of amenities). This information will be used to inform the next stage of detailed designs and will be discussed with the community in the next phase of community engagement in late 2017. • The community were generally comfortable with the edge path alignment and there was strong support for slowing the edge environment (see comfort rating page 14). The comments indicated that the edge could be used for a variety of activities, such as running or cycling. The majority of comments suggested that it was important to retain as many trees as possible through the edge path alignment and the park should retain its green feel. Pedestrian crossings, lighting and safety were regularly mentioned in comments relating to the edge. • There was general support for the design idea pathways (see comfort rating page 17), although there was some concern about the amount of pathways and that this may break up the green space too much (i.e. too much concrete). One of the themes that received a large amount of comments was the surface or finish of the paths indicating that the finish of the paths should be well considered, with a desire for natural finishes while maintaining accessibility and safety. People were in favour of maintaining the existing desire lines. • Many of the comments that referenced paths indicated the need to cater for cyclists. Of those many people were supportive of increasing cyclist safety through off road paths or slow environments and there was support for the east-west cycle route and linking up Limestone Avenue (Ainslie) to Sullivans Creek and McCaughey Street (Turner). However, there was also a large number of comments suggesting that if there was a shared environment this needed to be wide enough to safely accommodate bikes and pedestrians (particularly dog walking and slower pedestrians like children) and/or signage and education was needed to ensure safe interactions. • Crossing and access across Northbourne Avenue was regularly raised as an issue that needed to be addressed to better connect the park as one continuous space. Access was also raised as an issue at Sullivans Creek, Torrens Street and the Turner drain which runs east-west through the Turner end of the park. • People generally like the activity zones and approach to park rooms (see comfort rating page 10). The feedback strongly indicated that the community think it’s important that the park maintains a similar character and feel across the different rooms, and for it not to feel too ‘broken up’. More than 50 percent of survey respondents felt the activity areas were in the right spot and 8 percent said none of the activity areas were correctly placed or disagreed with the concept of activity areas. • A large proportion of the comments that referred to the types of activities indicated strong interest and some concerns around commercial activity of the park and the possible effects of noise from activities on residential areas. Things like food vans and ‘pop-ups’ often attracted a mix of love it or hate it comments. Markets and events was one of the most commonly referenced activities, with comments indicating the markets and events location in Turner was a positive addition. There was also support, particularly in the workshops, for the areas that provide quiet recreation and reflection. • There was some request for facilities to allow and encourage exercise, including, basketball rings, dog walking spaces, disc golf, pump track, orienteering course and ‘park run’ loop (2-5km). • A question on biodiversity of the park was answered by 100 out of 252 survey respondents. The majority of community members felt biodiversity was an important theme to consider in developing the masterplan and where possible, the biodiversity value of Haig Park should be maintained and if possible, strengthened. There was strong support for naturalising Sullivans Creek and some suggestions to change the tree species to increase biodiversity. The idea for nature play and recreation near Sullivans Creek was supported. page 4 Haig Park Masterplan Development – Phase 2 Community Engagement Summary • A commonly mentioned topic across many of the themes and areas of the park is lighting . This includes lighting paths and the perimeter of the park, as well as removing some trees to let sunlight in during the day. Lighting needs to be considerate of surrounding residents and wildlife. • The heritage of the park and trees was also a topic that was raised in relation to other themes across the various engagement activities. There was some recognition of the important value of heritage and the trees but different interpretations of that value. Of the people who mentioned heritage some believe the heritage value of the park relates to how the park connects to the broader city identity as a green garden city; a small section of the people who mentioned heritage believe the best way to maintain the heritage value is to have little to no change in the park and they feel that the woodland atmosphere of the park will be compromised by any of the changes suggested in the draft design ideas. Approximately half the people who mentioned heritage felt that heritage was important but should not restrict the opportunity for making the park more usable. • People feel that the community engagement process is being well run and that a lot of effort has gone in to making sure people have an avenue to input. However, a small number of people provided negative feedback on the process. Community vision for Haig Park: “Haig Park is a vibrant and inclusive urban park providing a series of safe and attractive spaces for passive and active enjoyment, whilst connecting with the heritage of the park.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Haig Park Masterplan and CMP Utilisation Study Report
    Haig Park Masterplan and CMP Utilisation Study Report Report Information Document Name Reference Utilisation Study Report Prepared by Tait Waddington On behalf of Office of the Coordinator-General, Urban Renewal Revision History Revision Revision Date Details Authorised Number A 13/04/2017 For Review by OCG Obelia Tait B 8/05/2017 Draft – Final Obelia Tait C 22/06/2017 Final Obelia Tait Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Purpose ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Study Location and Area ................................................................................................ 3 2.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Public Spaces Public Life (PSPL) ...................................................................................... 4 2.2 Scope ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 Limitations ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Haig Park, ACT
    Haig Park, ACT Conservation Management Plan Approved January 2020 Navin Officer heritage consultants Pty Ltd acn: 092 901 605 Number 4 Kingston Warehouse 71 Leichhardt St. Kingston ACT 2604 www.nohc.com.au ph 02 6282 9415 fx 02 6282 9416 Document control Project client: Tait Network Project proponent City Renewal Authority Document description: Conservation Management Plan Project Manager: Nicola Hayes Authors: Nicola Hayes and Julia Maskell Internal review: Rebecca Parkes, Kelvin Officer, Kerry Navin, Elle Lillis, Dr Susan McIntyre-Tamwoy Document status: Approved by ACT Heritage Council Document revision status Author Revision number Internal review Date issued Nicola Hayes and v1.6 Rebecca Parkes 17 May 2017 Julia Maskell Nicola Hayes and v1.9 – 19 May 2017 Julia Maskell Nicola Hayes v2.2 Kelvin Officer 30 June 2017 Nicola Hayes v2.4 Kerry Navin 3 July 2017 Nicola Hayes v3.1 – 11 July 2017 Nicola Hayes and v3.2 – 7 September 2017 Julia Maskell Nicola Hayes and v3.4 Elle Lillis 11 September Julia Maskell 2017 Nicola Hayes v3.5 – 19 September 2017 Nicola Hayes v4.2 24 May 2018 Nicola Hayes v4.3 30 May 2018 Nicola Hayes v4.5 Dr Susan McIntyre-Tamwoy 25 June 2018 Nicola Hayes v5.1 Changes following further 15 July 2019 council advice and copy edit Sophie Davis (City v5.2 Updated references to City 16 August 2019 Renewal Authority) and Gateway Urban Design Framework and place plan. Nicola Hayes v6.1 Changes following further 18 November 2019 council advice Sophie Davis (City v6.2 Updating tree information 3 December 2019 Renewal Authority)
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Planner National Capital Authority GPO Box 373 Canberra
    NATIONAL TRUST of AUSTRALIA (AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY) ABN 50 797 949 955 Unit 3.9, Level 3, Griffin Centre 20 Genge Street, Canberra ACT 2600 PO BOX 1144 CIVIC SQUARE ACT 2608 EMAIL: [email protected] WEB: www.nationaltrustact.org.au T: 62300533 Chief Planner National Capital Authority GPO Box 373 Canberra ACT 2601 cc All Assembly Members Residential Associations & Community Councils Deputy Director General EPSDD ACT Commissioner for the Environment ACT Government Architect ACT Heritage Council Senator Gai Brodtmann NATIONAL CAPITAL PLAN DRAFT AMENDMENT 91 – CITY AND GATEWAY URBAN DESIGN PROVISIONS Dear Sir We refer to our recent meeting about the Draft Amendment and welcome the opportunity to provide comment. The National Trust of Australia (ACT) is a not for profit community organisation with over 1,300 members and is widely respected in the community. The Trust’s role is to foster public knowledge about places and objects that are significant to our heritage, and promote their conservation. The Trust is supportive of properly considered high quality development. While we support the overall intent of the draft amendment we suggest tightening up of the language, restructuring the content, including clear statements of objectives for each of the detailed conditions (p11 onwards), and adding provisions that clarify certain aspects of these rules. Public art and play space within new developments and redevelopments should also be encouraged. Garden City is more than a Bush Capital At the same time we strongly believe it essential that urban design provisions are accompanied by and balanced with clear and consistent quality objectives, stringent planning controls that reward merit and reject mediocrity, and regulatory practices and enforcement that protect and enhance Canberra’s unique sense of place.
    [Show full text]
  • Explore- Your Free Guide to Canberra's Urban Parks, Nature Reserves
    ACT P Your free guide to Canberra's urban parks, A E R C I K V S R A E Parks and Conservation Service N S D N nature reserves, national parks and recreational areas. C O O I NSERVAT 1 Welcome to Ngunnawal Country About this guide “As I walk this beautiful Country of mine I stop, look and listen and remember the spirits The ACT is fortunate to have a huge variety of parks and recreational from my ancestors surrounding me. That makes me stand tall and proud of who I am – areas right on its doorstep, ranging from district parks with barbeques a Ngunnawal warrior of today.” and playgrounds within urban areas through to the rugged and Carl Brown, Ngunnawal Elder, Wollabalooa Murringe majestic landscape of Namadgi National Park. The natural areas protect our precious native plants, animals and their habitats and also keep our water supply pure. The parks and open spaces are also places where residents and visitors can enjoy a range of recreational activities in natural, healthy outdoor environments. This guide lists all the parks within easy reach of your back door and over 30 wonderful destinations beyond the urban fringe. Please enjoy these special places but remember to stay safe and follow the Minimal Impact Code of Conduct (refer to page 6 for further information). Above: "Can you see it?"– Bird spotting at Tidbinbilla Nature Reserve. AT Refer to page 50 for further information. Left: Spectacular granite formations atop Gibraltar Peak – a sacred place for Ngunnawal People. Publisher ACT Government 12 Wattle Street Lyneham ACT 2602 Enquiries Canberra Connect Phone: 13 22 81 Website www.tams.act.gov.au English as a second language Canberra Connect Phone: 13 22 81 ISBN 978-0-646-58360-0 © ACT Government 2013 Disclaimer: Every effort has been made to ensure that information in this guide is accurate at the time of printing.
    [Show full text]
  • Canberra Bird Notes
    canberra ISSN 0314-8211 bird Volume 42 Number 2 July 2017 notes Registered by Australia Post 100001304 CANBERRA ORNITHOLOGISTS GROUP, INC. PO Box 301 Civic Square ACT 2608 2016-17 Committee President Neil Hermes 0413 828 045 Vice-President Vacant Secretary Bill Graham 0466 874 723 Treasurer Lia Battisson 6231 0147 (h) Member Jenny Bounds Member Sue Lashko Member Chris Davey Member David McDonald Member Paul Fennell Email contacts General inquiries [email protected] President [email protected] Canberra Bird Notes [email protected]/[email protected] COG Database Inquiries [email protected] COG Membership [email protected] COG Web Discussion List [email protected] Conservation [email protected] Gang-gang Newsletter [email protected] GBS Coordinator [email protected] Publications for sale [email protected] Unusual bird reports [email protected] Website [email protected] Woodland Project [email protected] Other COG contacts Jenny Bounds Conservation Field Trips Sue Lashko 6251 4485 (h) COG Membership Sandra Henderson 6231 0303 (h) Canberra Bird Notes Editor Michael Lenz 6249 1109 (h) Assistant Editor Kevin Windle 6286 8014 (h) Editor for Annual Bird Report Paul Fennell 6254 1804 (h) Newsletter Editor Sue Lashko, Gail Neumann (SL) 6251 4485 (h) Databases Jaron Bailey 0439 270 835 (a.h.) Garden Bird Survey Duncan McCaskill 6259 1843 (h) Rarities Panel Barbara Allan 6254 6520 (h) Talks Program Organiser Jack Holland 6288 7840 (h) Records Officer Nicki Taws 6251 0303 (h) Website Julian Robinson 6239 6226 (h) Sales Kathy Walter 6241 7639 (h) Waterbird Survey Michael Lenz 6249 1109 (h) Distribution of COG publications Dianne Davey 6254 6324 (h) COG Library Barbara Allan 6254 6520 (h) Please use the General Inquiries email to arrange access to library items or for general enquiries, or contact the Secretary on 0466 874 723.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating Canberra: a Nation’S Cultural and Democratic Landscape
    Celebrating Canberra: A nation’s cultural and democratic landscape Exploring Canberra’s national heritage The Australian Heritage Council June 2012 The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. © Commonwealth of Australia 2012 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Public Affairs, GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 or email public.affairs@ environment.gov.au FOREWORD The Australian Heritage Council is excited to be considering the national heritage significance of Canberra in the national capital’s centenary year. Canberra is vital to all Australians as the heart of our democracy and pinnacle of our justice system. Born of the utopian ideals of the founders of Australian Federation and grounded in the Griffins’ visionary town plan, Canberra has grown to be one of the world’s great twentieth century cities. Australia’s national heritage comprises exceptional natural and cultural places that contribute to Australia’s national identity, from the Great Barrier Reef and the West Kimberley to Bondi Beach and Sydney Opera House. The National Heritage List identifies the critical moments in our development as a nation, it includes: places that speak to us of exploration and settlement like the Batavia Wreck Site, Port Arthur and Bonegilla Migrant Camp, mark iconic events such as the Eureka Stockade site and the Wave Hill Walk Off Route, showcase creative achievements like the Adelaide Parklands and City Layout, or reflect joys and sorrows in the lives of Australians.
    [Show full text]
  • Haig Park Place Plan
    Haig Park Place Plan IMAGE: Artist impression, Haig Park, looking toward Lonsdale Street Haig Park City Renewal Authority ■ Prepared by Tait Network Place Plan i Haig Park Place Plan Prepared by Tait Network for the City Renewal Authority Contact Consultant Team Design and Place Strategy Team Tait Network City Renewal Authority E: [email protected] Version Control P: (02) 6205 1878 17 July 2018 Haig Park Place Plan City Renewal Authority ■ Prepared by Tait Network 1 Contents Foreword 1.0 Vision 2 Canberra has incredible legacy of generous green spaces and beautiful parks. 1.1 Proposition 3 Haig Park in the heart of our city is a great example of our city’s wonderful public open space. It is a heritage-listed urban forest linking the city’s business 1.2 Place Values 4 and retail centre and the growing and changing inner north residential suburbs. It is one of Canberra’s most prominent landscape features and a 2.0 The Site 5 key community asset, the third largest of 11 inner-Canberra district parks. 2.1 Context 5 It is important to preserve and enhance these spaces in our changing and 2.2 History and Heritage 7 expanding city. 2.2.1 Conservation Management Plan 7 In its current state Haig Park is underused, perceived as unsafe and doesn't meet the needs of the Canberra community in 2018 and beyond. 3.0 Purpose 8 The ACT Government and City Renewal Authority recognise the importance and potential of Haig Park and are committed to improving the park so we can 4.0 Observation and Engagement 9 all enjoy it while ensuring any changes respect and recognise its heritage value 4.1 How We Engaged 9 and role as a city park and urban forest.
    [Show full text]
  • City Precinct Renewal Program – Snapshot Acknowledgement of Country the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) Is Ngunnawal Country
    City Precinct Renewal Program – Snapshot Acknowledgement of Country The Australian Capital Territory (ACT) is Ngunnawal country. The ACT Government acknowledges the Ngunnawal people as the traditional custodians of the Canberra region. The region is a significant meeting place to the Ngunnawal and surrounding Aboriginal Nations who have gathered here for thousands of years. The City Renewal Authority acknowledges and respects the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, their continuing culture and the contribution they make to the life of this city and this region. Creative Commons © Australian Capital Territory, Canberra, 2019 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the Territory Records Office, ACT Government, GPO Box 158, Canberra ACT 2601. Contact Details Enquiries about this publication should be addressed to: The Chief Executive Officer City Renewal Authority Office Address: Canberra Nara Centre 1 Constitution Avenue, Canberra ACT 2601 Postal Address: GPO Box 158 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone: (02) 6205 1878 Email: [email protected] Web: www.cityrenewalCBR.com.au Accessibility The ACT Government is committed to making its information, services, events and venues as accessible as possible. If you have difficulty reading a standard printed document and would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, such as large print, please phone Access Canberra on 13 22 81 or email [email protected] If English is not your first language and you require a translating and interpreting service, please phone 13 14 50. If you are deaf, or have a speech or hearing impairment, and need the teletypewriter service, please phone 13 36 77 and ask for Access Canberra on 13 22 81.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL TRUST of AUSTRALIA Heritage in Trust (ACT) November 2018 ISSN 2206-4958
    NATIONAL TRUST OF AUSTRALIA Heritage in Trust (ACT) November ISSN 2206-4958 2018 Jefferis (right) and Whelen (left) setting off from the Hotel Canberra on their 300-mile journey. Frontpiece, Vol 3 Around Australia’s Capital: The Jefferis and Whelen Journal Contents You might be surprised to learn that two Hotel Canberra Around Australia’s Capital: The Jefferis and Whelen porters spent their spare time between 1926 and 1932 Journal-Nick Swain p1-3 exploring around the Federal Capital Territory, covering ACT Trust News p4-5 some 2,000 kilometres. They produced a detailed and What’s next - coming up (inc. Heritage Diary) p5-9 well-illustrated manuscript of their travels which they Tours and Events – what’s been happening p9-12 called Around Australia’s Capital and dedicated it to National Trust ACT Heritage Awards p12-13 “The Pioneers of the Federal Capital Territory and their Special tribute to Dianne and Peter Dowling p13-15 descendants”. Many lived in remote parts and offered generous hospitality to Jefferis and Whelen. Heritage Happenings p15-16 This unofficial record is free of bureaucratic constraints and compiled in the British amateur tradition. Despite its journal has been recognised by its inclusion in the ACT Australian origins the journal came to the Canberra and Heritage Register. District Historical Society from England. How this happened remains a mystery. The significance of the Heritage in Trust www.nationaltrust.org.au Page 1 Heritage In Trust November 2018 Who were Jefferis and Whelen? Whelen. They are mostly in manuscript form although George Graham Jefferis was born in Canterbury, England, some parts are more like a scrap book.
    [Show full text]
  • Anzac Parade Final 20201023
    HERITAGE ASSESSMENT ANZAC PARADE RANDWICK CITY & CITY OF SYDNEY RANDWICK CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 2020 DOCUMENT STATUS Document Status Date Prepared by Reviewed by Draft Final 12 October 2020 Dr Sue Rosen Dr Rosemary Kerr; Dr Noni Boyd; Georgina Keep Final 19 October 2020 Dr Sue Rosen ABBREVIATIONS AIF Australian Imperial Forces ANZAC Australian and New Zealand Army Corp ICOMOS International Council on Monuments and Sites LEP Local Environmental Plan LGA Local Government Area NPWS National Parks and Wildlife Service NSW New South Wales POW prisoner of war RSL Returned and Services League UNSW University of New South Wales VC Victoria Cross VWA Voluntary Workers Association | 2 | Heritage Assessment of Anzac Parade | Randwick City Council| October 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In February 2017 Randwick City Council resolved ‘… to endeavour to restore and recreate the ANZAC Parade corridor as intended…’ 100 years earlier, in 1917. In that year, the Anzac Memorial Obelisk was constructed at the head of Randwick Road which had been reconstructed, widened and beautified with a flower bed running down the centre through the Moore Park precinct by Sydney City Council. The thoroughfare was renamed ‘Anzac Parade’ and opened in association with the dedication of the Anzac Memorial Obelisk to honour the ANZACs in the aftermath of the Gallipoli campaign and the then ongoing conflict of WWI. It was proposed that the memorial route would eventually run to La Perouse. This heritage assessment was commissioned to inform the restoration and recreation and presentation of Anzac Parade as a memorial route. There are two types of defence-related places associated with Anzac Parade: • places used for defence purposes, ranging from recruitment and training, to actual conflict, to rehabilitation and post conflict welfare, and • places of memorialisation – monuments and reminders in the streetscapes of tragic and pivotal conflicts with a national and international significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage in Trust (ACT) March 2021 ISSN 2206-4958
    NATIONAL TRUST OF AUSTRALIA Heritage in Trust (ACT) March ISSN 2206-4958 2021 Dr Charles Throsby (1777 – 1828) From his home near Moss Vale. Throsby always sought to progress the colony’s future. Photo: ACT Heritage The First Europeans on the Limestone Plains On Friday 8 December 1820, a cloudy, hot summer day on the Limestone Plains (now Canberra), two Europeans climbed the slopes of Black Mountain. They reached the Contents top and were met with a panoramic view stretching in all directions. They could see the river they had been The First Europeans on the Limestone following which had led them into the plains. They saw Plains p1-3 the low valleys of Woden and Tuggeranong extending ACT Trust News p4-6 into the distance and to the north and east the rolling Heritage Happenings p7 hills and plains of Gungahlin. But what they also saw Archaeology in the Dumps p7 were the surrounding mountain ranges, dark and foreboding looming over the low landscapes - the Tours, Walks and Talks p8-9 Brindabella Ranges. Heritage Diary p10 Kingston Arts Precinct p11-12 They were the first Europeans to stand on Black A Good News Story p12 Mountain and share the view across the landscape; but National Trust Information p13 there was a distance between the two both socially and of age. One was Charles Throsby Smith, just 22 years old. Born in Cambridgeshire, England, he had come from a middle class landed family. At the age of 16 years, he had tried his hand at sea and had visited New South Wales twice within two years.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Canberra Annual Report 2019 Volume 1
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 VOLUME 1 LETTER TO THE MINISTER April 2020 Dear Minister In accordance with Section 36 of the University of Canberra Act 1989, we present the Report by the Council of the University of Canberra for the period of 1 January to 31 December 2019, together with the financial statements in respect of that period. Yours sincerely Professor Tom Calma AO Chancellor Belinda Robinson Interim Vice-Chancellor and President CONTENTS FOREWORD FROM THE CHANCELLOR 2 INTRODUCTION FROM THE 4 VICE-CHANCELLOR AND PRESIDENT GOVERNANCE 6 2019 HIGHLIGHTS 10 IMPACT 12 ACADEMIC 18 RESEARCH AND INNOVATION 34 INFRASTRUCTURE 52 COMMUNITY 58 UC FOUNDATION 74 END NOTES 80 The University of Canberra acknowledges the Ngunnawal people, traditional custodians of the lands where Bruce Campus is situated. We wish to acknowledge and respect their continuing culture and the contribution they make to the life of Canberra and the region. We also acknowledge all other First Nations Peoples on whose lands we gather. Printed April 2020. Information in this report was correct at time of printing. Up-to-date information is available on the University’s website at www.canberra.edu.au Design and typesetting by University of Canberra Marketing Services Studio. Australian Government Higher Education (CRICOS) Provider #00212K. UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA FOREWORD From the Chancellor The University of Canberra had a The Council also welcomed new member Patricia Kelly and said farewell to Council members Prue Power, Caroline Gouws, progressive and successful year in 2019 Kieran Heid, Dr Holly Northam and Mara Eversons. We would as we strengthened our team of leaders like to especially thank Professor Dharmendra Sharma for his commitment as the Chair of the Academic Board, as he retired and retained our commitment to the from Council in December.
    [Show full text]