DOCSLIB.ORG

Beyond Aid: the Integration of Sustainable Development in A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

JANUARY 2016 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036 202-887-0200 | www.csis.org Lanham • Boulder • New York • London 4501 Forbes Boulevard Lanham, MD 20706 301- 459- 3366 | www.rowman.com Cover photo: Ambika Adhikari/USAID Beyond Aid The Integration of Sustainable Development in a Coherent International Agenda A Report of the CSIS Project on Prosperity and Development ISBN 978-1-4422-5906-5 Ë|xHSLEOCy259065z AUTHOR v*:+:!:+:! James Michel Blank Beyond Aid The Integration of Sustainable Development in a Coherent International Agenda AUTHOR James Michel A Report of the CSIS Proj ect on Prosperity and Development January 2016 Lanham • Boulder • New York • London 594-64135_ch00_3P.indd 1 1/9/16 8:25 AM About CSIS For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked to develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. ­Today, CSIS scholars are providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofit organ ization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full- time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analy sis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global health and economic integration. Thomas J. Pritzker was elected chairman of the CSIS Board of Trustees in November 2015. Former U.S. deputy secretary of defense John J. Hamre has served as the Center’s president and chief executive officer since 2000. CSIS does not take specific policy positions; accordingly, all views expressed herein should be understood to be solely those of the author(s). © 2016 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-4422-5906-5 (pb); 978-1-4422-5907-2 (eBook) Center for Strategic & International Studies Rowman & Littlefield 1616 Rhode Island Ave nue, NW 4501 Forbes Boulevard Washington, DC 20036 Lanham, MD 2 0706 202-887-0200 | www . csis . org 301 - 459 - 3366 | www . rowman . com 594-64135_ch00_3P.indd 2 1/9/16 8:25 AM Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations iv Executive Summary vi 1. Introduction 1 2. Ele ments of the 2030 Agenda 4 Goals and Targets 4 Global Partnership 13 Transition beyond Aid to Effective Development Cooperation 20 3. The Implementing Environment for the 2030 Agenda 27 Multiple Actors and Approaches 27 Development Financing Trends and Innovations 34 Knowledge Accumulation, Sharing, and Coordination 43 Conflict and Fragility 51 Other Influential Factors 54 4. Achieving Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development 63 5. Concluding Observations 70 Selected Bibliography 73 About the Author 93 | III 594-64135_ch00_3P.indd 3 1/9/16 8:25 AM Acronyms and Abbreviations 2030 Agenda Post-2015 agenda adopted at the Sustainable Development Summit as Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development ADB Asian Development Bank AfDB African Development Bank AIIB Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank BEPS Base erosion and profit shifting tax planning strategies BRICS Association of five major emerging national economies: Brazil, Rus sia, India, China, and South Africa CPDE CSO Partnership for Development Effectiveness CPIA Country Policy and Institutional Assessment, World Bank CSO Civil society organ ization DAC Development Assistance Committee of the Or ga ni za tion for Economic Cooperation and Development DDD Doing Development Differently EBRD Eu ro pean Bank for Reconstruction and Development ECDPM Eu ro pean Center for Development Policy Management ECOSOC United Nations Economic and Social Council ERD Eu ro pean Report on Development EITI Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative EU Eu ro pean Union G20 Group of 20 leading economies: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Rus sia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the Eu ro pean Union GDI German Development Institute GFI Global Financial Integrity GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (German development assistance agency) GPEDC Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation GSDR Global Sustainable Development Report HLDCF High Level Development Cooperation Forum HLPF High Level Po liti cal Forum on Sustainable Development IADB Inter- American Development Bank IATI International Aid Transparency Initiative ICESDF International Committee of Experts on Sustainable Development Financing IV | 594-64135_ch00_3P.indd 4 1/9/16 8:25 AM ICTD International Center for Tax and Development IDA International Development Association, World Bank IDB Islamic Development Bank IDFC International Development Finance Club IEAG United Nations Secretary- General’s In de pen dent Expert Advisory Group on a Data Revolution for Sustainable Development IMF International Monetary Fund INDC Indications of Nationally Determined Contributions ( toward achieving the objectives of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) IOM International Or ga ni za tion for Migration IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ITC International Tax Compact JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency LDC Least Developed Country MDGs Millennium Development Goals MPI Multidimensional Poverty Index NGO Nongovernmental organ ization NSDS National Strategy for the Development of Statistics ODA Official Development Assistance ODI Overseas Development Institute OECD Or ga ni za tion for Economic Cooperation and Development Paris21 Partnership for Statistics in the 21st C entury PCD Policy coherence for development PCSD Policy coherence for sustainable development Rio+20 2012 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development and its outcome document, The Future We Want SDGs Sustainable Development Goals SDSN Sustainable Development Solutions Network TADAT Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool UN United Nations UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development UNDESA United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs UNDG United Nations Development Group UNDP United Nations Development Program UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Or ga ni za tion UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UNFPA United Nations Population Fund UNGA United Nations General Assembly UN- HABITAT United Nations H uman Settlements Program UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund UNIDO United Nations Industrial Development Or ga ni za tion USAID United States Agency for International Development WHO World Health Or ga ni za tion WTO World Trade Or ga ni za tion B EyOND AID | v 594-64135_ch00_3P.indd 5 1/9/16 8:25 AM Executive Summary n September 25, 2015, world leaders adopted a new post-2015 international develop- Oment agenda, Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. This new agenda calls for a universal, integrated effort to preserve our planet and improve the lives of its inhabitants. Its centerpiece is a set of global goals that envision a world in which poverty and hunger are ended, the global environment is protected, and people benefit from sustainable economic pro gress and peaceful, just, and inclusive socie ties. The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are far more expansive and ambitious than the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). They build on the history of the MDGs and also on the conclusions of the 2012 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Develop- ment (Rio+20) to convey a sophisticated vision of ending poverty, achieving peaceful, just, and inclusive socie ties, and ensuring economic, environmental, and social sustainability. The SDGs call for strengthening the means of implementation and revitalizing the global partnership for sustainable development. The global partnership w ill operate in a wide variety of local contexts and involve a highly diverse array of stakeholders. It will operate through multiple channels at international, regional, national, and community levels. Governance of this global partnership will require qualities of openness, transparency, and inclusion. The governance structure should be capable of evolving in an iterative fashion while adapting to changed circumstances. The optimum outcome might be a collec- tion of horizontal and vertical networks with broad stakeholder participation, bound together by a shared vision of the new agenda and a shared commitment to the princi ples of collaborative governance of complex systems. More than anything, successful implementation of the post-2015 development agenda will depend on the ability of the many diverse actors and stakeholders to adapt their be hav ior. We know that development is a complex, iterative pro cess. Impor tant research findings emphasize the influence of history and culture, inclusive and effective institu- tions, po liti cal contests and po liti cal settlements, local leadership, international support that is sensitive to the local po liti cal, economic, and social context, and continuous experi- mentation and learning. The Busan Partnership Declaration outlined an emerging consensus, premised on princi ples of local
Recommended publications
  • Comprehensive Vulnerability Monitoring Exercise Multidimensional Poverty Index

    Comprehensive Vulnerability Monitoring Exercise Multidimensional Poverty Index

    Comprehensive Vulnerability Monitoring Exercise Multidimensional Poverty Index May 2019 Background: What is a Multidimensional Poverty Index? Poverty is usually measured based on the money-metric concept which considers someone as poor if they do not have enough economic resources. This implies that the indicators used to measure poverty are only related to prices and expenditures on goods and services (UNICEF, 2014). However, since the 1990s, multiple methods have been developed to measure poverty. In this paper the focus will be on the Alkire-Foster (AF) Method, developed by Sabina Alkire and James Foster at Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI). The AF method is a flexible technique for measuring poverty or well- being, (OPHI, 2015). It can incorporate different dimensions and indicators to create measures specific to particular contexts. Within the AF method, there are several steps required to construct a Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) which vary based on the exact methodology used for the creation of the MPI: Choice of purpose for the index (monitor, target, etc) Choice of Unit of Analysis (individual, household etc) Choice of Dimensions Choice of Variables/Indicator(s) for dimensions Choice of Poverty Lines / thresholds for each indicator/dimension Choice of Weights for indicators within dimensions Choice of Weights across dimensions Within the Comprehensive Vulnerability Monitoring Exercise (CVME), WFP Turkey has developed an MPI following the AF method, which is used to assess the poverty levels of different groups of households. The CVME data was collected from March to August 2018. It includes responses from 1,301 households; the sampling methodology ensures the data is representative of all refugees living in Turkey.
  • The Hollowing of Summit Diplomacy in a Socially Distanced World

    The Hollowing of Summit Diplomacy in a Socially Distanced World

    The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15 (2020) 583-598 brill.com/hjd All That’s Lost: The Hollowing of Summit Diplomacy in a Socially Distanced World Tristen Naylor London School of Economics, London, United Kingdom [email protected] Received: 15 June 2020; revised: 30 August 2020; accepted: 21 September 2020 Summary This essay considers the implications of virtual summits replacing in-person multilat- eral gatherings of political leaders. Focusing on the loss of physicality, it argues that two critical dimensions of summitry are eliminated in this shift: sublime governance and inter-moments. Drawing on illustrative examples from the Group of 20, it demon- strates that while moving online maintains the formal, procedural interactions around which summits are built, doing so loses these critical elements of summitry which render it a valuable and unique practice in within the overall institution of diplomacy. This move also undercuts the effects of these elements, in the immediate context of a particular summit and more broadly within the international system itself. The elimi- nation of summitry’s performative and interpersonal dimensions fundamentally ren- ders online meetings unable to achieve what in-person summits can. This has acute consequences in the immediate wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, and also more gener- ally as diplomacy moves online. Keywords sublime governance – inter-moments – summits – performativity – practices – face-to-face interaction – diplomacy – psychology © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/1871191X-bja10041Downloaded from Brill.com09/24/2021 11:53:45PM via free access 584 Naylor 1 Introduction On 26 March 2020, the Group of 20 (G20) held an online ‘virtual’ summit to discuss the COVID-19 pandemic and the global economic crisis it ushered in.
  • Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters’ (Eustitia): the Politics of Civil Justice Under the EU's Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ)

    Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters’ (Eustitia): the Politics of Civil Justice Under the EU's Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ)

    DRAFT (March 2015) PLEASE CONTACT AUTHOR BEFORE CITING ‘Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters’ (EUstitia): The Politics of Civil Justice under the EU's Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) Professor Helen E. Hartnell Paper presented at EUSA Fourteenth Biennial Conference Panel 3 C: The EU and Criminal Justice Boston – 5-7 March 2015 This paper maps the EU’s civil justice policy field, and offers some ideas about the broader significance of these developments. Since 1999, when the Amsterdam Treaty communitarized “judicial cooperation in civil matters” and the European Council laid out a five-year plan at its Tampere Summit, the EU's efforts to create a “genuine area of justice” (Tampere Milestones, ¶¶ I.3.5 & I.3.7) have been rapid and dramatic. The AFSJ field was “transformed ... into a huge ‘building site’ ” (Weyembergh 2000). More than a dozen substantial – and in some cases highly ambitious and controversial – legislative and other civil justice measures have been adopted, and more are in the pipeline.1 These measures permeate the legal infrastructure upon which the EU’s legal order is built. Some of them surpass even the broadest reading of the formal Treaty language on “judicial cooperation”. The scope and pace of these developments have been so dramatic that even experts in the affected fields were initially caught by surprise.2 Together, Amsterdam (1997) and Tampere (1999) breached the crumbling wall of national legal sovereignty, and unleashed a deluge of legal and other institutional measures in the civil justice field. The movement towards harmonization in this field is not, however,“a triumphal parade: it looks more like a [conquest], house by house, of the fortified town of national self-determination” (Biavati 2001: 90).
  • Barbados High Commission

    Barbados High Commission

    H.E. Mr. Guy Hewitt High Commissioner for Barbados to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Mr Tom Tugendhat, MP Chair Foreign Affairs Select Committee House of Commons London, SW1A 0AA 09 April 2018 Dear Chair, I write to request an opportunity for the victims, migration and human rights advocates, High Commissioners, and other concerned groups to have an interaction with members of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee on the situation facing some elderly Commonwealth-born residents in the UK. I write in part as a product of the Commonwealth as I was born in the UK to parents from India and Barbados. The situation is that these migrants from the Caribbean, and other Commonwealth countries, many of whom have been here since childhood, now, due to their irregular status, face the possibility of destitution, detention, and deportation. Based on information received from Migration Observatory at Oxford University we estimate there could be up to 50,000 Commonwealth-born persons in the UK who arrived before 1971 but do not have regularised status. The situation started with the call from Britain in the 1950s and 1960s to journey here to address labour shortages. Having left the Caribbean for the “Mother Country” as British Subjects, as the islands were still colonies, and having secured leave to remain and subsequently being educated, skilled, worked, taxed and levied in the UK, it never occurred to them that they were not legally British. The situation changed markedly in 2012, when the Home Office began systematic immigration checks. The real issue is that these long-term undocumented UK residents are not treated as anomalies to be regularised, but as “illegal immigrants” and barred from working and refused access to government services: the denial of NHS treatment, and loss of welfare benefits including housing benefits.
  • Annotated Agenda of the Inter-American Juridical Committee

    Annotated Agenda of the Inter-American Juridical Committee

    ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES INTER-AMERICAN JURIDICAL COMMITTEE CJI OEA/Sec.General DDI/doc. 6/2021 May 5, 2021 Original: English/Spanish ANNOTATED AGENDA OF THE INTER-AMERICAN JURIDICAL COMMITTEE 99th REGULAR SESSION Virtual session August 2-11, 2021 (Document prepared by the Department of International Law) General Secretariat Organization of American States www.oas.org/en/sla/iajc 2 3 EXPLANATORY NOTE The Department of International Law of the OAS Secretariat for Legal Affairs of the General Secretariat has prepared this document, which includes background information to facilitate consideration of the various topics on the agenda that the Inter-American Juridical Committee will take up at its 99th Regular Session, in light of the agenda adopted on April 9, 2021, document CJI/RES. 267 (XCVIII/21). * * * 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXPLANATORY NOTE 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 THEMES UNDER CONSIDERATION 5 1. GUIDE FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF CONVENTIONALITY 5 2. VALIDITY OF FOREIGN JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN LIGHT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION ON EXTRATERRITORIAL VALIDITY OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS AND ARBITRAL AWARDS 18 3. ELECTRONIC WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS 26 4. INTERNATIONAL LAW APPLICABLE TO CYBERSPACE (CYBER-SECURITY) 30 5. LEGAL ASPECTS OF FOREIGN DEBT 38 6. INTERNATIONAL CUSTOMARY LAW IN THE CONTEXT OF THE AMERICAN CONTINENT 38 7. ELECTORAL FRAUD VIS-À-VIS THE INTER-AMERICAN DEMOCRATIC CHARTER 42 8. MODEL LAW ON THE USE OF FIREWORKS, FOR EITHER PERSONAL USE OR IN MASS FIREWORK DISPLAYS 45 9. GUIDE ON THE LAW APPLICABLE TO FOREIGN INVESTMENTS 50 10. INCORPORATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS GUIDING PRINCIPLES ON BUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS 50 11.
  • A Short Guide to the Foreign & Commonwealth Office

    A Short Guide to the Foreign & Commonwealth Office

    A Short Guide to the Foreign & Commonwealth Office June 2015 Overview Britain’s Britain’s Supporting British Supporting, enabling national security prosperity citizens overseas and influencing | About this guide This Short Guide summarises what the | Contact details Foreign & Commonwealth Office does, how much it costs, recent and planned changes and what to look out for across its main business areas and services. If you would like to know more about the NAO’s work on the Foreign & Commonwealth Office, please contact: Chris Bedford Director, FCO financial audit [email protected] 020 7798 7281 Tom McDonald Director, FCO value for money audit [email protected] 020 7798 7706 If you are interested in the NAO’s work and support The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General for Parliament more widely, please contact: (C&AG), Sir Amyas Morse KCB, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO, which employs some 810 people. The C&AG Adrian Jenner certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other Director of Parliamentary Relations public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report [email protected] to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. Our 020 7798 7461 studies evaluate the value for money of public spending, nationally and locally. Our recommendations and reports on good practice For full iPad interactivity, please view this PDF help government improve public services, and our work led to Interactive in iBooks or GoodReader audited savings of £1.15 billion in 2014.
  • Dimensional and Distributional Contributions to Multidimensional Poverty

    Dimensional and Distributional Contributions to Multidimensional Poverty

    Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI) Oxford Department of International Development Queen Elizabeth House (QEH), University of Oxford OPHI WORKING PAPER NO. 100 Dimensional and Distributional Contributions to Multidimensional Poverty Sabina Alkire* and James Foster** March 2016 Abstract The adjusted headcount ratio M0 of Alkire and Foster (2011a) is increasingly being adopted by countries and international organizations to measure poverty. Three properties are largely responsible for its growing use: Subgroup Decomposability, by which an assessment of subgroup contributions to overall poverty can be made, facilitating regional analysis and targeting; Dimensional Breakdown, by which an assessment of dimensional contributions to overall poverty can be made after the poor have been identified, facilitating coordination; and Ordinality, which ensures that the method can be used in cases where variables only have ordinal meaning. Following Sen (1976), a natural question to ask is whether sensitivity to inequality among the poor can be incorporated into this multidimensional framework. We propose a Dimensional Transfer axiom that applies to multidimensional poverty measures and specifies conditions under which poverty must fall as inequality among the poor decreases. An intuitive transformation is defined to obtain multidimensional measures with desired properties from unidimensional FGT measures having analogous properties; in particular, Dimensional Transfer follows from the standard Transfer axiom for # unidimensional measures. A version of the unidimensional measures yields the M-gamma class !" containing the multidimensional headcount ratio for γ = 0, the adjusted headcount ratio M0 for γ = 1, and a squared count measure for γ = 2, satisfying Dimensional Transfer. Other examples show the ease with which measures can be constructed that satisfy Subgroup Decomposability, Ordinality, and Dimensional Transfer.
  • Bilateral Summit Diplomacy in Western European and Transatlantic Relations, 1956–63

    Bilateral Summit Diplomacy in Western European and Transatlantic Relations, 1956–63

    02_EHQ 31/3 articles 3/7/01 10:13 am Page 427 Jeffrey G. Giauque Bilateral Summit Diplomacy in Western European and Transatlantic Relations, 1956–63 During the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, innovations in transportation and communication facilitated the revival of an old diplomatic tool: summit meetings and personal contacts between heads of state and government. Meetings of sovereigns go back centuries, but with the development of the modern state system and diplomatic practice from the fifteenth century, meet- ings of leaders had become less important in relations between states. Resident ambassadors and foreign-ministry professionals took on the central roles in diplomacy. However, this practice began to break down in turn during the nineteenth century. Reliable rail travel made it convenient for European leaders to meet on occasion, and some, including Napoleon III, made regular use of the practice. The telegraph and telephone also facilitated greater diplomatic centralization. Prior to these inventions, it could take weeks or months for ambassadors to receive new instructions from their governments. As a result, they had considerable autonomy and policy-making authority as they responded to developments in foreign capitals. However, the development of rapid means of communication gradually reduced many ambassadors from policy-makers to symbolic representatives of their countries and transmitters of messages. All of these changes were consolidated after the First World War when Woodrow Wilson’s ‘new diplomacy’ called all existing diplomatic practice into question while Wilson and other govern- ment leaders travelled to Paris to negotiate the peace settlement personally. Wilsonian diplomacy posited that public meetings of government leaders were a more democratic means of diplomacy European History Quarterly Copyright © 2001 SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi, Vol.
  • Person Equivalent Headcount Measures of Poverty

    Person Equivalent Headcount Measures of Poverty

    IZA DP No. 9402 Person Equivalent Headcount Measures of Poverty Tony Castleman James Foster Stephen C. Smith October 2015 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Person Equivalent Headcount Measures of Poverty Tony Castleman Catholic Relief Services and IIEP, George Washington University James Foster George Washington University Stephen C. Smith George Washington University and IZA Discussion Paper No. 9402 October 2015 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 E-mail: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character.
  • Legal English for Judicial Cooperation in Civil and Commercial Matters

    Legal English for Judicial Cooperation in Civil and Commercial Matters

    Legal English for Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters. Regulation 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments (Brussels Ia) Eva Samaniego Fernández 1 2 1. General legal terms. Choose the appropriate term below for the definitions. TERMS settlement party habitual residence regulation choice of authentic leading question hearing court/forum instrument selection draft disposition admission of debt counterclaim legal person default to have jurisdiction action pecuniary bench trial to fall due hung jury ADR (Alternative decision conveyancing dissenting opinion Dispute Resolution) transcript trial court/court of expert injunction record opinion/evidence to award overturn concurring opinion breach of contract legalisation acknowledgement of irreconcilable appeal receipt appearance assignment undertaking damages DEFINITIONS 1 Legal proceedings (civil or criminal). 2 Recognition by an addressee that a letter or notification has been received. 3 Drawing up a legal document to transfer the ownership of property from seller to buyer. 4 Where a judge disagrees with the majority opinion in a case. 5 Where a judge agrees with the majority opinion in a case. 6 The preliminary version of a legal document, such as a contract or an Act. 7 Where more than one court has the jurisdiction to hear a case and parties wish to select which one would be more favourable for their case. 8 To have the legal power to hear and decide a case. 3 9 Place (usually country) where a person habitually lives. 10 Person or group involved in a contract or in proceedings as a litigant. 11 A claim brought by a defendant in response to the claimant.
  • Korean Peninsula: State of Play Further Uncertainty Follows Period of Hope

    Korean Peninsula: State of Play Further Uncertainty Follows Period of Hope

    BRIEFING Korean peninsula: State of play Further uncertainty follows period of hope SUMMARY North Korea and South Korea have been on different paths since World War II. The North has remained isolated and poor, its regime inspired by Soviet structures, with a centrally planned economy. The South, meanwhile, after alternating periods of autocratic and democratic rule, made a clear choice at the end of the 1980s in favour of democracy and a market economy, a choice that has led the country to success in several sectors. North and South Korea are still technically at war, as the military conflict of 1950-1953 ended with an armistice that was never followed by a peace treaty. There are 28 500 US (United States) soldiers stationed in South Korea, which signed a Mutual Defence Treaty with Washington in 1953. There have been frequent tensions over the past 70 years, and North Korea has become a de facto nuclear power since the 2000s, prompting international sanctions. Early in 2018 a detente raised hopes of peace. North Korean leader Kim Jong-un met with US President Donald Trump and South Korean President Moon Jae-in, but the summits have led neither to the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula, nor to the easing of sanctions against the North. Pyongyang's frustration provoked new tensions in the region in June 2020, when the North, in a symbolic move, destroyed the liaison office in the border area, the de facto embassy of the two Koreas. But Kim's options seem limited at present, and there is little chance of progress until after the US presidential elections.
  • Breaking out of the Poverty Trap

    Breaking out of the Poverty Trap

    CHAPTER THREE Breaking Out of the Poverty Trap Lindsay Coates and Scott MacMillan Introduction In 2018, one of us visited a rural village in Bangladesh to speak to participants in a “graduation program,” a term used to describe programs designed to break the poverty trap with a boost of multiple, sequenced interventions. When we asked one woman what the program had changed for her, she brought out a piece of paper inviting her to a village event. Before she went through the program, her neighbors barely knew she existed, she said. Now she was a member of the com- munity, invited to people’s homes and weddings. One hears echoes of this senti- ment from participants in similar graduation programs worldwide. Such stories illustrate just one of the many cruel aspects of ultra- poverty: those afflicted by it tend to be invisible— to neighbors, distant policymakers, and nearly everyone in between. The ultra- poor need to stop being invisible to policymakers. We need to pay closer attention to the poorest and the unique set of challenges they face, for without a better understanding of the lived reality of ultra- poverty, we will fail to live up to the promise of “leaving no one behind.” Without programs tai- lored for people in these circumstances, the extreme poverty rate will become increasingly hard to budge. We are already starting to see this reflected in global poverty data. For decades, the global extreme poverty rate, defined as the portion of humanity living below the equivalent of $1.90 per day, fell rapidly, from 36 percent in 1990 to 10 percent in 2015.