DOCSLIB.ORG

The Planning Inspectorate COMMENTS on CASE (Online Version) Appeal Reference: APP/X0360/W/19/3241800

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Planning Inspectorate COMMENTS on CASE (Online Version) Appeal Reference: APP/X0360/W/19/3241800 For official use only (date received): 16/01/2020 16:59:03 The Planning Inspectorate COMMENTS ON CASE (Online Version) Please note that comments about this case need to be made within the timetable. This can be found in the notification letter sent by the local planning authority or the start date letter. Comments submitted after the deadline may be considered invalid and returned to sender. Appeal Reference: APP/X0360/W/19/3241800 DETAILS OF THE CASE Appeal Reference APP/X0360/W/19/3241800 Appeal By HAINES HOMES CONSTRUCTION Site Address Land to Rear of, 344 Barkham Road WOKINGHAM RG41 4DE SENDER DETAILS Name MR DAVID CLARKE Address 19 Dowles Barn Close Barkham WOKINGHAM RG41 4ET ABOUT YOUR COMMENTS In what capacity do you wish to make representations on this case? Appellant Agent Interested Party / Person Land Owner Rule 6 (6) What kind of representation are you making? Final Comments Proof of Evidence Statement Statement of Common Ground Interested Party/Person Correspondence Other Page 1 of 4 YOUR COMMENTS ON THE CASE Re Case APP/X0360/W/19/3241800 Orchard Grange (Wokingham) Management Company Limited are the owners of the access road ('Accessway')and the common land and infrastructure beyond as designated within BK469616 We have only just received the Deed of Easement dated 4 June 2019 from Cala via their solicitors Laytons on the 9th January 2020. The lands by way of BK469616 were transferred Title Absolute to Orchard Grange (Wokingham) Management Company on 18th July 2019 The proposed constructor has not consulted with the members of Orchard Grange (Wokingham) Management Company Limited (OGWMC) at any time other than 10th July 2019 post protest by the members at the taking down of a section of fence and removal of shrubs on Dowles Barn Close. At this time a supposed plan of a 4 bed, 2 story dwelling was offered and rightly rejected at the initial planning application stage. The protest being that the members had no idea what was going on and what rights Haines had attained. There is no foul water connection within the permitted connection zone that is the ‘Accessway’ coloured yellow on the plan. The members reject connection to our foul water system as it does not extend to the 'Accessway'. The proposed constructor has made a connection over private property and will be requested under the covenants to remove this. The constructor needs to show how he will deal with foul water appropriately. The Deed of Easement makes for access over the ‘Accesway’ to and from the rear of 344 but does not have a provision for parking within or obstructing the ‘Accessway’. It also does not allow for entry beyond the ‘Accessway’ during or post build. The constructor has failed in the covenant to keep vehicles off the pavement and assumes the right to park vehicles within this area. Enforceable parking restrictions will now apply within the ‘Accessway’ for the safety and convenience of the members using it. It has also been proposed to gate the development that is Orchard Grange, in respect of easement should this be installed it will be behind the access point of the property. The fence line as currently installed will be reinstated at the legal boundary line along the ‘Accessway’ save deviation for the given line of sight to maintain the keeping of Orchard Grange. Any property built to the rear of 344 will not under any circumstances be considered part of Orchard Grange. Traffic management will be essential during any build to ensure that construction vehicles arrive and depart the development safely without danger to legitimate traffic to Orchard Grange and on the Barkham Road. Some vehicles will have no option but to reverse into the Barkham Road. Restricted access beyond the ‘Accessway’ to future residents of any proposed property may also necessitate vehicles to reverse into the Barkham Road or park there in the first place. 5.4 of the Easement requires proof that covenants are correctly entered on titles, this has not been provided to us. Schedule 2.7 Cost of maintenance – no agreement has been made such that this can be incorporated appropriately into documents required of 5.4 This lack of communication by Haines with the members of Orchard Grange (Wokingham) Management Company Limited is quite possibly indicative of their inability to communicate with the community at large as may be borne out by other objections to this development. This is an inappropriate development with respect to true access over assumed access and retains too many unanswered questions as to how it can work in what is a private road with financial liability to Orchard Grange (Wokingham) Management Company Limited. The members of Orchard Grange (Wokingham) Management Company Limited should not and will not Page 2 of 4 be forced into what the constructor wants beyond its legitimate rights. The members of Orchard Grange oppose the Development of a 4 bedroom property as proposed and consider any construction with access via Dowles Barn Close to the rear of 344 will be beset with excessive litigation through build and to the occupiers thereafter. The Deed of Easement will be supplied with this document. In the case that it is not received you should contact any of the representatives of the Members noted below. Dave Clarke, Chris Soza, Dick Reed for Orchard Grange (Wokingham) Management Company Limited Registered number 09920225 Registered office: Suite No 1, Stubbings House, Henley Road, Maidenhead Berkshire SL6 6QL Company Members: Residents 1 – 19 Dowles Barn Close, 1 – 3 (odd) and 2 – 10 (even) Field Place (25 properties) Members’ representatives: Dave Clarke (19), Chris Soza (6) and Dick Reed (4) DBC Page 3 of 4 COMMENT DOCUMENTS The documents listed below were uploaded with this form: Relates to Section: REPRESENTATION Document Description: Your comments on the appeal. File name: Deed of Easement dated 4 June 2019 executed by Benjamin Haines (10034811....pdf PLEASE ENSURE THAT A COPY OF THIS SHEET IS ENCLOSED WHEN POSTING THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS TO US Page 4 of 4 DATED + aqu€ 2019 Dreo oF EASEMENT relating to Land at 344 Barkham Road, Wokingham RG41 4DE between CALA MANAGEMENT LIMITED (Grantor) and BENJAMIN IAN HAINES (Grantee) L3367 892v9/029537.001410 - LAYTONS Thisdeedisdated + anpF 2019 HM Land Registry LAND REGISTRATION ACTS 1925 to 2002 Grantor's Title Number: 8K469616 Administrative Area: WOKINGHAM Grantee's Title Number: 8K25936 and 8K473317 Administrative Area: WOKINGHAM Parties (1) CALA MANAGEMENT LIMITED incorporated and registered in England and Wales with company number SC013655 whose registered office is at Adam House 5 Mid New Cultins Edinburgh EH11 4DU (Grantor) (21 BENJAMIN IAN HAINES of 344 Barkham Road Wokingham RG41 4DE (Grantee) BACKGROUND (A) The Grantor owns the freehold interest in the Grantor's Property; (B) The Grantee is the registered proprietor of that part of the Grantee's Property that is registered in title 8K25936 and is the beneficial owner of the Ransom Strip having today taken a transfer of that strip of land from Vortal Properties Limited. (c) The Grantor has agreed to grant the Rights to the Grantee for the benefit of the Grantee's Property on the terms contained in this deed. AGREED TERMS 1. lnterpretation The following definitions and rules of interpretation apply in this deed. 1.1 Definitions: Accessway: the roadway shown coloured yellow on the Plan and the route of the proposed driveway shown coloured green so far as it forms part of the Grantor's Property. Conduits: channels drains sewers pipes wires cables watercourses and other service conducting media Grantee's Covenants: the covenants set out in Schedule 2. 73367 892v9 /029537.001410 - LAYTONS Grantee's Property: the property being land to the rear of 344 Barkham Road Wokingham RG41 4DE as shown edged red on the Plan and forming part of the land registered at HM Land Registry under title number BK25936 and the Ransom Strip Grantor's Covenants: the covenants set out in Schedule 3. Grantor's Property: the property being land on the south east of Barkham Road Wokingham and registered at HM Land Registry under title number 8K469616 referred to above and each and every part of it. Plan: the plan annexed to this deed. Ransom Strip: the 0.5 meters strip of land between the points marked C to D on the title plan of 8K473317 Reserved Rights: the rights set out in Schedule 4. Rights: the rights set out in Schedule 1. VAT: value added tax charged under the Value Added Tax Act 1994 and any similar replacement tax and any similar additional tax. Visibility Splay: that part of the Accessway as is to the southwest of the visibility splay line mapped on the Plan and being land required to provide effective sight lines for the development within the Grantee's Property. 1.2 Any reference to the Grantor or Grantee shall include that party's personal representatives, successors or permitted assigns. 1.3 Clause, Schedule and paragraph headings shall not affect the interpretation of this deed. 1.4 Except where a contrary intention appears, references to Clauses and Schedules are to the Clauses and Schedules of this deed and reference to paragraphs are to paragraphs of the relevant Schedule. 1.5 The Schedules form part of this deed and shall have effect as if set out in full in the body of this deed. Any reference to this deed includes the Schedules. 1.6 A reference to a statute or statutory provision is a reference to it as amended, extended or re-enacted from time to time and shall include all subordinate legislation made from time to time under that statute or statutory provision and all orders, notices, codes of practice and guidance made under it.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aberdeen Student Law Review
    Aberdeen Student Law Review With thanks to our sponsors Stronachs LLP July 2011 Volume 2 www.abdn.ac.uk/law/aslr THE EDITORIAL BOARD 2010 - 2011 Managing Editor Leanne Bain Editors Alice Cannon Ross Douglas Emma Fraser Stuart Lee Bruce Mangeon Fairweather Charlotte Taylor Ryan T. Whelan Jennifer White FOREWORD BY THE HON . LORD WOOLMAN SENATOR OF THE COLLEGE OF JUSTICE Has the ASLR already reached its second volume? I am delighted that the brio of those involved in launching the project has been sustained. That is evident from the table of contents for the new volume. The topics range across legal history, oil and gas law and the law of evidence. In my view, volume two confirms that the ASLR is continuing to make a significant contribution to legal learning in Scotland. Stephen Woolman July 2011 INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME TWO In 1987 Professor Erwin N Griswold, former Dean of Harvard Law School, gave an insight into the history of the Harvard Law Review, the oldest student-led law review in the world. He acknowledged: Some people are concerned that a major legal periodical in the United States is edited and managed by students. It is an unusual situation, but it started that way, and it developed mightily from its own strength.1 I firmly believe in the strength of the student law review, and it is this belief that has shaped the endeavours of the editorial team during the past year The second year of a professional publication can be as difficult as the first, and this year has certainly not been without challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for the Disposal of Surplus Land
    Guide for the Disposal of Surplus Land March 2017 1 © Crown copyright 2013 Produced by Cabinet Office You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Alternative format versions of this report are available on request from Government Property Unit 4th Floor, Red Zone 1 Horse Guards Road London [email protected]. 2 Contents 1.0 Introduction and Purpose of the Guide 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Policy and Drivers 2.0 Identifying Surplus Land 2.1 Strategic Asset Management 2.2 Identifying Surplus Land 2.3 Listing Land as Surplus 3.0 Disposal Options and Monitoring 3.1 National Property Controls - Approval to Dispose 3.2 Considerations for the Disposal of Surplus Land 3.3 Disposals Monitoring and Performance Reporting 4.0 Open Market Sale 4.1 Preparing for Disposal 4.2 Accelerating the Disposal Process 4.3 Disposal Routes and Marketing 4.4 Sale and Completion 4.5 Post Transaction Monitoring Annex 1 - References Annex 2 - Heritage Assets Annex 3 - Issues Affecting Disposal Annex 4 - Advisers 3 4 1.0 Introduction and Purpose of the Guide 1.1 Introduction The disposal of surplus government owned property is an important part of the Government’s drive to improve its estate management and create an efficient, fit-for-purpose and sustainable estate that meets future needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    Vol. 1004 Wednesday, No. 3 17 February 2021 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Insurance (Restriction on Differential Pricing and Profiling) Bill 2021: Second Stage [Private Members] � � � 219 17/02/2021U00500Ceisteanna ó Cheannairí - Leaders’ Questions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 248 17/02/2021Y00900An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 256 17/02/2021CC00050Ceisteanna ar Reachtaíocht a Gealladh - Questions on Promised Legislation � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 262 17/02/2021DD03000Message from the Standing Business Committee of Dáil Éireann � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 267 17/02/2021DD03200Rural Equality Bill 2021: First Stage � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 267 17/02/2021EE00900Principles of Social Welfare Bill 2021: First Stage� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 269 17/02/2021EE01700Civil Registration (Right of Adoptees to Information) (Amendment) Bill 2021: First Stage � � � � � � � � � � � � 270 17/02/2021FF00800Covid-19 (Agriculture, Food and the Marine): Statements� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 272 17/02/2021UU04700Land Development Agency Bill 2021: Order for Second Stage � � � � � � � � � � � � �
    [Show full text]
  • Health Building Note 00-08 Part B: Supplementary Information for Part A
    This document has been withdrawn. Find The efficient management of healthcare estates and facilities on the NHS websie. Health Building Note 00-08 Part B: Supplementary information for Part A Withdrawn October 2014 Health Building Note 00-08 Part B: Supplementary information for Part A Withdrawn Health Building Note 00-08 Part B: Supplementary information for Part A Withdrawn © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www. nationalarchives. gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. This document is available from our website at https://www.gov.uk/government/ collections/health-building-notes-core-elements ii Preface About Health Building Notes Health Building Note structure Health Building Notes give best practice The Health Building Notes have been organised guidance on the design and planning of new into a suite of 17 core subjects. healthcare buildings and on the adaptation/ extension of existing facilities. Care-group-based Health Building Notes provide information about a specific care group They provide information to support the briefing or pathway but cross-refer to Health Building and design processes for individual projects in Notes on generic (clinical) activities or the NHS building programme. support systems as appropriate. Core subjects are subdivided into specific The Health Building Note suite topics and classified by a two-digit suffix (-01, Healthcare delivery is constantly changing, and -02 etc), and may be further subdivided into so too are the boundaries between primary, Supplements A, B etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Transparency Report
    Transparency Report Transparency Report Government’s land and property disposals in 2017/18 and retrospective reporting for 2016/17 January 2019 1 Transparency Report 2 Transparency Report Transparency Report Government’s land and property disposals in 2017/18 and retrospective reporting for 2016/17 January 2019 3 Transparency Report © Crown copyright 2013 Produced by Cabinet Office You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Alternative format versions of this report are available on request from: [email protected] 4 Transparency Report Contents Introduction 7 Policy context 8 Land sales headlines 9 Details of assets sold 10 Appendix 1: Disposals guidance 43 Appendix 2: Transparency Review 43 Appendix 3: Glossary of terms 44 5 Transparency Report 6 Transparency Report Introduction The disposal of surplus government owned property is an important part of the Government’s drive to improve its estate management and create an efficient, fit-for-purpose and sustainable estate that meets future needs. This means disposing of surplus land and buildings in a way that delivers value for the taxpayer, boosts growth and delivers new homes. The Government has committed to freeing up land with capacity for at least 160,000 homes by 2020 and raising at least £5 billion from land and property disposals by 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Tax: Henry George and the Social Politics of Land Reform in the Gilded Age and Progressive Era
    The Last Tax: Henry George and the Social Politics of Land Reform in the Gilded Age and Progressive Era A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Department of History Michael Willrich, Advisor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Alexandra Wagner Lough August 2013 This dissertation, directed and approved by Alexandra Wagner Lough’s Committee, has been accepted and approved by the Faculty of Brandeis University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Malcolm Watson, Dean Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Dissertation Committee: Michael Willrich, Department of History Mark Hulliung, Department of History Daniel T. Rodgers, Department of History, Princeton University Copyright 2013 Alexandra Wagner Lough Doctor of Philosophy Acknowledgments This project properly began in 2004 when I was an undergraduate at the University of Pacific in Stockton, California and decided to write a history thesis on Henry George. As such, it seems fitting to begin by thanking my two favorite professors at Pacific, Caroline Cox and Robert Benedetti. Their work inspired my own and their encouragement and advice led me to pursue graduate work in history at Brandeis University. I am forever grateful for their support. I consider myself extremely fortunate to have been admitted into the Ph.D. program in American History at Brandeis. Not only have I received top-notch instruction from brilliant faculty, but I also have received generous funding. I want to extend my gratitude to Rose and Irving Crown and the Crown family for the fellowship that financed my graduate education.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing Public Housing Liverpool’S Hidden History of Collective Alternatives
    Reconstructing Public Housing Liverpool’s hidden history of collective alternatives Reconstructing Public Housing Liverpool’s hidden history of collective alternatives Reconstructing Public Housing Matthew Thompson LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY PRESS First published 2020 by Liverpool University Press 4 Cambridge Street Liverpool L69 7ZU Copyright © 2020 Matthew Thompson The right of Matthew Thompson to be identified as the author of this book has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication data A British Library CIP record is available ISBN 978-1-78962-108-2 paperback eISBN 978-1-78962-740-4 Typeset by Carnegie Book Production, Lancaster An Open Access edition of this book is available on the Liverpool University Press website and the OAPEN library. Contents Contents List of Figures ix List of Abbreviations x Acknowledgements xi Prologue xv Part I Introduction 1 Introducing Collective Housing Alternatives 3 Why Collective Housing Alternatives? 9 Articulating Our Housing Commons 14 Bringing the State Back In 21 2 Why Liverpool of All Places? 27 A City of Radicals and Reformists 29 A City on (the) Edge? 34 A City Playing the Urban Regeneration Game 36 Structure of the Book 39 Part II The Housing Question 3 Revisiting
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Karl Mackie
    Dr Karl Mackie CEDR Solve Mediator, Founding CEO of CEDR/CEDR Solve Direct line: +44 (0) 20 7536 6090 Email: [email protected] "A great wealth of experience and knowledge ... calm, pragmatic, sensible and not shy of suggesting where there could be more possibilities" Mediation Background As founding CEO of CEDR and CEDR Solve, Karl Mackie has extensive experience of mediation and independent intervention. His mediation practice has a strong commercial and international perspective, including work with Sovereign governments and major public institutions. Karl is one of the best known names in commercial mediation practice and brings legal, business and psychological training to his core practice. As CEO of CEDR he has also been involved in mediation and process design for an extensive mix of complex multi-party cases, as well as regularly chairing negotiation sessions. Clients include Maxwell Pension Trusts, Atlantic Computers, BCCI, Alder Hey. Case values have ranged from £100,000 to £1bn plus. Karl also directs CEDR's Certificate in Advanced Negotiation, coaching senior professionals and executives on how to apply effective negotiation skills in their everyday work. Karl has extensive experience in the following sectors: Commercial Employment Engineering/Energy Entertainment Family Businesses Finance/Banking Insurance/Reinsurance International IP/IT Joint Ventures Partnerships Private Clients Professional Negligence Property Public Sector Media Telecommunications Transport For full details of Karl's mediation experience
    [Show full text]
  • Block Pdh.101 Development Strategies
    BLOCK PDH.101 DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES © UNISON FW/JI.09.03 UNISON Open College, 1 Mabledon Place, London WC1H 9AJ PDH.101: Development Strategies Preface This first block in the Unit on Development Strategies will set the strategic context in which housing development is undertaken. The first section looks at National Planning Policy strategies and explains what the planning system is and how it controls the location of housing. It also briefly considers the historical development and the ‘plan led’ system. The second section reviews the development plan system, including the role of development plans, and the different types of plans and what they cover. The section also looks at the relatively recent addition of a regional planning dimension to complement the existing local and county level development plan structures. Having obtained an overview of the development planning system, the third section examines the various development motives and perspectives of local authorities, RSLs and private developers. This leads into a discussion about the concepts of neighbourhood and community and what these mean for housing design and development. We then turn to examine the many different regeneration programmes and partnerships and their effectiveness. The fourth and fifth sections round off the block by considering housing needs surveys and the use of housing needs data, respectively. The fourth section concentrates on defining and classifying housing needs, and approaches to identifying needs through surveys and waiting lists. The fifth and final section highlights the way in which public and private sector developers use housing need data in making their development decisions. The motives and perspectives of developers with regard to markets, profits, affordability and needs are all covered.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Matt, Is There a Limit to the Number of Documents I Can Submit?
    From: To: Subject: Re: "Moorings" further important information Date: 20 May 2013 14:58:49 Attachments: Pleasure-and-Profit-from-Canals-Keith-Boyfield-1990.pdf Dear Matt, Is there a limit to the number of documents I can submit? As this one will be of major importance to the investiagtion and should be over looked. I last saw it about 7 years ago. It was like finding the light switch in a dark cellar. To breifly explain. It was published in 1990 by the Centre of Policy Studies and written by a Keith Boyfield. Someome has now copied it to the web, which breaches copyright without a doubt. However the importance of the onlined ideas and the uncanny resemblance to the changes made to British Waterways and its activities since the 1990s, I believe far outways any copyright issues. This resemablance of BW (CRT) today, is not a carbon copy as there has been slight changes in the execution, but the basic direction fits, and the major elements exist. (BWD) British Waterways Developments who, since the mid 90s have entered into parnerships to develop waterside land like Paddington Basin, Tottemhale Hale (Hale wharf), Brentford Dock etc. Under names like "ingloo" and others. I have often heard the complaint from people opposing these planning applications "British waterways is the developer on the application. This is a conflict of interest, as they are also the statetory consultee! "Such BWD partnership activities was suggested by Boyfield. Then there is the new Canals and Rivers Trust, which seems to have very similar responsablities as the Trust that Boyfeild came up with.
    [Show full text]
  • On Money Rovaniemi: University of Lapland 2010, 324 Pp., Acta Universitatis Lapponiensis 175 Dissertation: University of Lapland ISSN 0788-7604 ISBN 978-952-484-351-5
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lauda 8IVS%YZMRIR 3R1SRI] %OEXIIQMRIRZÈMXÚWOMVNENSOE0ETMR]PMSTMWXSR ]LXIMWOYRXEXMIXIMHIRXMIHIOYRRERWYSWXYQYOWIPPE IWMXIXÈÈRNYPOMWIWXMXEVOEWXIXXEZEOWM 0ETMR]PMSTMWXSR)WOSNE%WOSWEPMWWE OIWOMZMMOOSREOIPPS %GXE)PIGXVSRMGE9RMZIVWMXEXMW0ETTSRMIRWMW 9RMZIVWMX]SJ0ETPERH *EGYPX]SJ7SGMEP7GMIRGIW 'ST]VMKLX8IVS%YZMRIR (MWXVMFYXSV0ETPERH9RMZIVWMX]4VIWW 43&S\ *-6SZERMIQM XIP JE\ TYFPMGEXMSR$YPETPERH [[[YPETPERH PYT 4ETIVFEGO -7&2 -772 THJ -7&2 -772 [[[YPETPERH YRMTYFEGXERIX 3 Abstract Auvinen Tero On Money Rovaniemi: University of Lapland 2010, 324 pp., Acta Universitatis Lapponiensis 175 Dissertation: University of Lapland ISSN 0788-7604 ISBN 978-952-484-351-5 The study explores the political choices and confl icts inherent in the “technical” specifi cations of any monetary system and some of the social scientifi c implications of the prevailing forms of money in the widest possible sense of the terms. As a constantly evolving social relation, no single theory of money is likely to capture its tremendous capacity for self-transformation. It is argued that the precise manner in which the prevailing forms of fi nancial capital in general and money in particular are socially constructed creates a privileged reality for fi nancial capital which distorts competition among the diff erent factors of production and eliminates money’s capacity to accurately capture and reproduce real world economic phenomena – if possible even in theory. Contrary to some of the traditional economistic legitimating narratives for money, it is suggested that control over the issuance and circulation of money may render various aspects of the human governable with a fraction of the resources that might be required to implement comparable combinations of coercion and rewards through alternative institutional mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • GAINING GROUND III – Saga's End in the Last Two Issues I've Been
    GAINING GROUND III – Saga's end In the last two issues I’ve been recounting the saga of my attempts to get the Land Registry to amend the western boundary of my land. I claimed that what is now my garden should include a strip of land which was adjacent to the unregistered land that I had purchased as a building plot. The seller had told me that the strip of land was not owned by him and was not part of the plot, and so the plot was registered with the land excluded. But investigations later led me to believe that the strip should have been included. Initially the Land Registry would not accept my claim and I had to do a lot of work to convince them otherwise. I showed them historical aerial photos of the land, and got the Ordnance Survey to correct their inaccurate plan of the locality. Finally, in March 2002, the Land Registry did agree to rectify the boundary, and I thought, at the time, that I had cause to celebrate. (See the diagram showing the new boundary. I’ve marked the strip of land in yellow.) The disputed strip of land (New plot boundary in red; disputed land in yellow) The Land Registry told me to send them the charge certificate for the land so that it could be amended. The certificate was kept by my mortgage company, and since I wanted to also get the eastern boundary of my land rectified, I thought it better to delay sending the charge certificate until the matter of the eastern boundary had also been sorted out.
    [Show full text]