DOCSLIB.ORG

BREXIT BULLETIN Headlines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BREXIT BULLETIN Headlines BREXIT BULLETIN 6 September 2019 Headlines • Parliament passes ‘no to No Deal’ legislation. MPs and Lords passed the ‘Benn Bill’ which seeks to stop the UK leaving the EU without a deal on 31 October. • Prime Minister puts the Government on an election footing. Following the Government defeat on the Benn Bill the PM attempted to call an early General Election on 15 October but didn't receive sufficient support. • Another big week ahead. The PM is expected to bring forward another motion calling for a General Election before Parliament is prorogued for 5 weeks ahead of a Queen’s Speech. ‘Benn Bill’ Backbenchers take control of the Commons • On Tuesday Parliament returned from its summer recess and MPs decided that their main attempt to stop a No Deal Brexit would focus on passing legislation which would force the Government to act. Backbench MPs tabled and passed an emergency motion to take control of the order paper on Wednesday. • The Government lost by 27 votes, with 21 Conservative MPs rebelling including former Cabinet Ministers such as Philip Hammond, Ken Clarke and David Gauke. In response to voting against the Government, Boris Johnson removed the Conservative Whip from the 21 rebels meaning they now sit as Independent MPs. • With control of the order paper, the rebel backbenchers spent Wednesday debating a bill in the name of Hillary Benn MP, thus becoming the ‘Benn Bill’. The anti-No Deal backbenchers rushed the Bill through the House of Commons in one day. • The Bill has this afternoon passed unamended in the House of Lords. The Bill is due to receive Royal Assent on Monday 9 September and become law. What is in the Benn Bill • The Bill itself stipulates that if MPs haven’t approved a Brexit deal via a meaningful vote or approved leaving the EU without a deal by 19 October, then the Prime Minister must send a letter (specifically worded in the bill) to the President of the European Council which seeks an extension to Article 50 until 31 January 2020. If the EU agrees to the date, then the Prime Minister should also agree. • If the EU proposes an alternative date, the Bill requires the Prime Minister to agree, unless MPs vote against in a motion within two days. The Bill does not stop the Prime Minister from agreeing on an extension to Article 50 himself. • If an extension is agreed, the Bill requires the Secretary of State for Exiting the EU to publish a report on progress made in negotiations by 30 November 2019. General Election footing Prime Minister’s plan for 15 October election on hold • Following his Commons defeat on Tuesday, the Prime Minister announced that he would table a motion the following day to call an early General Election to take place on 15 October. • To secure an early General Election under the Fixed Terms Parliament Act, a motion requires the support of at least two-thirds of all MPs in the Commons (434 MPs). The PM secured 298 votes to 56, thus not reaching the necessary two-thirds threshold. • Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn and other opposition parties voted against the motion for a general election as they believed there was a risk the Prime Minister could move the poll to after 31 October - by which point the UK would have left the European Union with or without a deal. • The Prime Minister plans to hold another motion for a General Election on Monday, however, he will require a significant number of opposition MPs to back the motion for it to pass. This morning, the leaders of Labour, Lib Dems, SNP, Plaid Cymru and the Green Party held a conference call agreeing that they would not vote with the Government to hold any General Election before the EU Council on 18 October. • Other than passing a vote in Parliament the PM has very limited options to call an early election. The only other options are to hold a vote in no confidence in the Government, which is unlikely or pass a law to amend the Fixed Term Parliaments Act, which opposition parties could thwart or attach their conditions to via amendments. Parliament heading towards prorogation • As announced last week, Parliament will prorogue (be suspended) next week until 14 October, in advance of a Queen’s Speech. Currently this is expected to take place on Monday, however, the Government has until Thursday if it believes a vote in the Commons for an early election could be successful. • If no early election vote is tabled and passed by a two-thirds majority before prorogation it will not be possible for there to be a General Election held before 31 October. Next Week Points to watch out for next week • The Benn Bill will receive Royal Assent in Parliament on Monday 9 September. • Parliament will be prorogued, bringing to an end the longest Parliamentary session in history. This must take place by Thursday, but is expected to happen on Monday. • Even if a General Election is not secured next week, political parties will move into campaign mode ahead of the political party conference season, beginning on 14 September with the Liberal Democrats in Bournemouth. Labour’s conference in Brighton takes place the week after, with the Conservatives in Manchester at the end of September. ADS Brexit Hub We are regularly updating the Brexit Hub on our website to help members preparing for Brexit, cutting through the political noise, and providing a single authoritative source of information on the impact of Brexit on the Aerospace, Defence, Security and Space sectors. You can access the Hub here to guide you through the current state of play on Brexit. • In order to help our members prepare for Brexit; our “Brexit Readiness” questionnaire is available to help you in developing your Brexit plan. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ANDREW MARR SHOW 9TH JUNE 2019 ESTHER MCVEY AM: Do You
    1 ESTHER MCVEY ANDREW MARR SHOW 9TH JUNE 2019 ESTHER MCVEY AM: Do you think, Esther McVey, that it makes a difference that you have a very different background – you didn’t go to Eton and all the rest of it – how would it feel different to have a woman of your background leading the Conservative Party? EM: Well, our party is a broad church. It always has been. It’s about meritocracy. And for me, our party’s also about social mobility. It’s about anybody can come from anywhere and achieve the highest post in the land, so long as they are prepared to work hard enough, so long as they can get a good team together and so long as you’ve got a vision that reaches out to the country. And that’s why I’m travelling the country all the time as part of a pub road show with blue collar Conservatives to really hear what people want us to do. Once we’ve delivered Brexit, what do they want after that? And they want money in schools, they want money going to police and they also, which I’ve announced today, is the public sector pay guarantee, because people want to know that they’re going to have a fair crack of the whip too. AM: But we’re not there yet. We’re not out of the EU yet. And your position on that is essentially that there’s not going to be another negotiation, they’re not really going to renegotiate, so we have to be prepared to leave at the end of October with no deal, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Morrison: Essential Public Affairs for Journalists 6E
    Morrison: Essential Public Affairs for Journalists 6e CHAPTER 1: THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION AND MONARCHY TABLE 1A MAIN ENTITLEMENTS LISTED IN BILL OF RIGHTS 1689 Freedoms for all ‘Englishmen’ Sanctions for Roman Catholics Freedom from royal interference with the law— Ban on Catholics succeeding to English throne— sovereigns forbidden from establishing their own reflecting the supposed fact that ‘it hath been found courts, or acting as judge themselves by experience that it is inconsistent with the safety and welfare of this protestant kingdom to be governed by a papist prince’ Freedom from being taxed without Parliament’s Obligation on newly crowned sovereigns to swear agreement oaths of allegiance to Church of England Freedom to petition reigning monarch Freedom for Protestants only to possess ‘arms for Bar on carrying weapons defence’ Freedom from drafting into peacetime army without Parliament’s consent Freedom to elect MPs without sovereign’s interference Freedom from cruel and unusual punishments and excessive bail Freedom from fines and forfeitures without trial TABLE 1B RULES GOVERNING MONARCHICAL SUCCESSION IN THE ACT OF SETTLEMENT 1701 Details Protestants only The Crown should pass to Protestant descendants of Electress Sophie of Hanover (first cousin once removed of Queen Anne, who inherited throne after deaths of Mary and William) No marriages to Catholics Monarchs ‘shall join in communion’ with Church of England and not marry Roman Catholics England for the English If anyone not native to England inherits throne, the country will not wage war for ‘any dominions or territories which do not belong to the Crown of England without the consent of Parliament’ Loyalty from the Crown No monarch may leave ‘British Isles’ without Parliament’s consent (repealed by George I in 1716) Openness before Parliament All government matters within Privy Council’s jurisdiction (see p.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing the Line Between News and the Business of News: Exploring Journalists' Use of Twitter Jukes, Stephen
    www.ssoar.info Crossing the line between news and the business of news: exploring journalists' use of Twitter Jukes, Stephen Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Jukes, S. (2019). Crossing the line between news and the business of news: exploring journalists' use of Twitter. Media and Communication, 7(1), 248-258. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1772 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Media and Communication (ISSN: 2183–2439) 2019, Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 248–258 DOI: 10.17645/mac.v7i1.1772 Article Crossing the Line between News and the Business of News: Exploring Journalists’ Use of Twitter Stephen Jukes Faculty of Media and Communication, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] Submitted: 7 September 2018 | Accepted: 4 January 2018 | Published: 21 March 2019 Abstract Anglo-American journalism has typically drawn a firm dividing line between those who report the news and those who run the business of news. This boundary, often referred to in the West as a ‘Chinese Wall’, is designed to uphold the inde- pendence of journalists from commercial interests or the whims of news proprietors. But does this separation still exist in today’s age of social media and at a time when news revenues are under unprecedented pressure? This article focuses on Twitter, now a widely used tool in the newsroom, analysing the Twitter output of 10 UK political correspondents during the busy party conference season.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2018 Overview
    Autumn Budget October 2018 Overview Introduction A Budget for “Strivers, Grafters and Carers” Budgets, as we all know, take place on Wednesdays. After the excitement of Prime Minister’s Questions, the Deputy Speaker calls ‘the Chancellor of the Exchequer’ and he – so far we have not had a female Chancellor – bounds to his feet, delivering an upbeat message about the nation’s finances and pouring scorn on Her Majesty’s Opposition in equal measure. Most people had been expecting this year’s Budget to be in November: for a long time, Wednesday 19th or 26th looked the likely dates. But the Budget has been brought forward to avoid being enmeshed in the latest rounds of Brexit negotiations in late November. So why not Wednesday, October 31st? The newspapers are convinced that Philip Hammond did not want to give their headline writers an open goal by presenting a Budget on Hallowe’en and so Monday it was. The Economic and Political Background When he was Chancellor, George Osborne constantly repeated the mantra that whatever he did as Chancellor, far bigger forces were acting on the UK economy. We can see that all too plainly at the moment with the continuing trade war between the US and China which – with both Donald Trump and Xi Jinping seemingly holding entrenched positions – shows no sign of ending soon. Closer to home, a stand-off is developing between the EU and the Italian government over Italy’s budget. In simple terms, the Italian government want to kickstart the economy – which has barely grown for ten years – with a programme of public spending.
    [Show full text]
  • On Parliamentary Representation)
    House of Commons Speaker's Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) Session 2008–09 Volume II Written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 21 April 2009 HC 167 -II Published on 27 May 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Speaker’s Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) The Conference secretariat will be able to make individual submissions available in large print or Braille on request. The Conference secretariat can be contacted on 020 7219 0654 or [email protected] On 12 November 2008 the House of Commons agreed to establish a new committee, to be chaired by the Speaker, Rt. Hon. Michael Martin MP and known as the Speaker's Conference. The Conference has been asked to: "Consider, and make recommendations for rectifying, the disparity between the representation of women, ethnic minorities and disabled people in the House of Commons and their representation in the UK population at large". It may also agree to consider other associated matters. The Speaker's Conference has until the end of the Parliament to conduct its inquiries. Current membership Miss Anne Begg MP (Labour, Aberdeen South) (Vice-Chairman) Ms Diane Abbott MP (Labour, Hackney North & Stoke Newington) John Bercow MP (Conservative, Buckingham) Mr David Blunkett MP (Labour, Sheffield, Brightside) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton & Honiton) Mr Ronnie Campbell MP (Labour, Blyth Valley) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) Mr Parmjit Dhanda MP (Labour, Gloucester) Andrew George MP (Liberal Democrat, St Ives) Miss Julie Kirkbride MP (Conservative, Bromsgrove) Dr William McCrea MP (Democratic Unionist, South Antrim) David Maclean MP (Conservative, Penrith & The Border) Fiona Mactaggart MP (Labour, Slough) Mr Khalid Mahmood MP (Labour, Birmingham Perry Barr) Anne Main MP (Conservative, St Albans) Jo Swinson MP (Liberal Democrat, East Dunbartonshire) Mrs Betty Williams MP (Labour, Conwy) Publications The Reports and evidence of the Conference are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Andrew Marr Show, 31 March, 2019 David Gauke, Justice Secretary
    1 ANDREW MARR SHOW, 31ST MARCH, 2019 DAVID GAUKE, JUSTICE SECRETARY ANDREW MARR SHOW 31ST MARCH 2019 DAVID GAUKE, MP JUSTICE SECRETARY AM: Mr Gauke, is Theresa May’s deal now finally and definitely dead? DG: Well, I’m not sure that one can say that, for the very simple reason is that the country needs to find a way forward which reflects the referendum result, does so in a way that protects our jobs and security and the integrity of the United Kingdom and our national security. And I think in the end you always I think keep coming back to this point, that the Prime Minister’s deal does do that. Now we have to recognise that it’s been defeated in the House of Commons. AM: Three times it’s been slaughtered, not just defeated. DB: It has been defeated three times, but parliament has not, as yet, found a way forward. And parliament needs to find a way forward that in my view ensures that we leave the European Union in an orderly manner. And it’s not yet done so. And, you know, one of the options that still remains there is the Prime Minister’s deal, because I have to say I think it is the best way of meeting that objective. AM: It’s reported that it’s going to be brought back on Wednesday, possibly in the form of legislation. Is that true? DG: Well I think the Prime Minister is reflecting on what the options are and is considering what may happen, but I don’t think any decisions have been made as yet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anglo-America Special Relationship During the Syrian Conflict
    Open Journal of Political Science, 2019, 9, 72-106 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojps ISSN Online: 2164-0513 ISSN Print: 2164-0505 Beyond Values and Interests: The Anglo-America Special Relationship during the Syrian Conflict Justin Gibbins1, Shaghayegh Rostampour2 1Zayed University, Dubai, UAE 2Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA How to cite this paper: Gibbins, J., & Abstract Rostampour, S. (2019). Beyond Values and Interests: The Anglo-America Special Rela- This paper attempts to reveal how intervention in international conflicts (re) tionship during the Syrian Conflict. Open constructs the Anglo-American Special Relationship (AASR). To do this, this Journal of Political Science, 9, 72-106. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2019.91005 article uses Syria as a case study. Analyzing parliamentary debates, presiden- tial/prime ministerial speeches and formal official addresses, it offers a dis- Received: November 26, 2018 cursive constructivist analysis of key British and US political spokespeople. Accepted: December 26, 2018 We argue that historically embedded values and interests stemming from un- Published: December 29, 2018 ity forged by World War Two have taken on new meanings: the AASR being Copyright © 2019 by authors and constructed by both normative and strategic cultures. The former, we argue, Scientific Research Publishing Inc. continues to forge a common alliance between the US and Britain, while the This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International latter produces notable tensions between the two states. License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Keywords Open Access Anglo-American, Special Relationship, Discourse, Intervention, Conflict 1. Introduction At various times in its protracted history, the Anglo-American Special Rela- tionship1 has waxed and waned in its potency since Winston Churchill’s first usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Thecoalition
    The Coalition Voters, Parties and Institutions Welcome to this interactive pdf version of The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Please note that in order to view this pdf as intended and to take full advantage of the interactive functions, we strongly recommend you open this document in Adobe Acrobat. Adobe Acrobat Reader is free to download and you can do so from the Adobe website (click to open webpage). Navigation • Each page includes a navigation bar with buttons to view the previous and next pages, along with a button to return to the contents page at any time • You can click on any of the titles on the contents page to take you directly to each article Figures • To examine any of the figures in more detail, you can click on the + button beside each figure to open a magnified view. You can also click on the diagram itself. To return to the full page view, click on the - button Weblinks and email addresses • All web links and email addresses are live links - you can click on them to open a website or new email <>contents The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Edited by: Hussein Kassim Charles Clarke Catherine Haddon <>contents Published 2012 Commissioned by School of Political, Social and International Studies University of East Anglia Norwich Design by Woolf Designs (www.woolfdesigns.co.uk) <>contents Introduction 03 The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Introduction The formation of the Conservative-Liberal In his opening paper, Bob Worcester discusses Democratic administration in May 2010 was a public opinion and support for the parties in major political event.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources/Contacts for Older People's Action Groups on Housing And
    Resources/contacts for Older People’s Action Groups on housing and ageing for the next General Election It is not long before the next general election. Politicians, policy makers and others are developing their manifestos for the next election and beyond. The Older People’s Housing Champion’s network (http://housingactionblog.wordpress.com/) has been developing its own manifesto on housing and will be looking at how to influence the agenda locally and nationally in the months ahead. Its manifesto is at http://housingactionblog.wordpress.com/2014/08/07/our-manifesto-for-housing-safe-warm-decent-homes-for-older-people/ To help Older People’s Action Groups, Care & Repair England has produced this contact list of key people to influence in the run up to the next election. We have also included some ideas of the sort of questions you might like to ask politicians and policy makers when it comes to housing. While each party is still writing their manifesto in anticipation of the Party Conference season in the autumn, there are opportunities to contribute on-line at the party websites included. National Contacts – Politicians, Parties and Policy websites Name Constituency Email/Website Twitter www.conservatives.com/ Conservative Party @conservatives www.conservativepolicyforum.com/1 [email protected] Leader Rt Hon David Cameron MP Witney, Oxfordshire @David_Cameron www.davidcameron.com/ Secretary of State for Brentwood and Ongar, [email protected] Communities and Local Rt Hon Eric Pickles MP @EricPickles Essex www.ericpickles.com
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Party Conference Activities PDF
    Committee: Dated: Public Relations and Economic Development Sub- 19 October 2015 Committee Subject: Public City of London Corporation – Annual Party Conference Activities Report of: For Decision Director of Public Relations Summary Every autumn the UK political parties hold annual conferences to debate issues, set out policy priorities, and engage with key stakeholders and party activists. The 2015 party conferences provided the City Corporation with an opportunity to engage with the main political parties following the General Election, by promoting its work among key political audiences; developing and strengthening the political contact programme with local and national politicians; and enhancing internal understanding of the likely policy evolution of the different parties. In 2015, the City Corporation organised a high-quality programme of activities at the annual conferences of the three main UK parties, including fringe meetings and policy-focused dinners. In addition, a smaller policy focused lunch will be held at the Scottish National Party (SNP) Conference. Planning has now also begun for the 2016 party conferences. Recommendation(s) The Sub-Committee is recommended to: (i) note the information about the City Corporation’s activities in 2015; and (ii) agree to the general approach set out for the delivery of the City Corporation’s activities in 2016. Main Report Background 1. The City of London Corporation hosts events at the Liberal Democrat, Labour and Conservative Party conferences every year. This traditionally entails a public fringe meeting early on the Monday evening followed shortly afterwards by a private dinner. These events provide the City Corporation with a crucial opportunity to engage with key political audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Every Year the City of London Corporation Delivers A
    Committee(s): Date(s): Policy and Resources Committee 11 April 2019 Subject: Public Request for finance: 2019 Party Conferences Report of: For Decision Bob Roberts, Director of Communications Report author: Jan Gokcen, Corporate Affairs Officer Summary Every year the City of London Corporation delivers a programme of strategic political engagement at political party conferences. This report presents Members with the proposed programme of City Corporation activities at 2019 Liberal Democrat, Labour and Conservative party conferences respectively. This report also asks Members to approve funding for the think tank partnerships crucial to delivering the City Corporation’s party conference programme, the total sum being £41,000. Recommendation Members of the Policy and Resources Committee are asked to: agree the City Corporation’s proposed programme of activity at 2019 party conferences; agree to provide funding for the City Corporation’s partnerships, the total sum amounting to £41,000 from your Committees 2019/20 Policy Initiative Fund categorised under ‘Events’ and charged to City’s Cash, with the four think tanks listed below at Liberal Democrat, Labour, and Conservative party conferences: i) Social Market Foundation ii) The Institute for Public Policy Research iii) Centre for Policy Studies iv) Policy Exchange agree to visit the question of providing funding for partnership(s) at the 2019 Scottish National Party conference once details concerning the date, location and venue of the conference have been released. Main Report Background 1. To ensure that opportunities for strategic engagement at respective party conferences are maximised, officers have negotiated partnerships with prominent think tanks. These partnerships will help secure senior figures of industry and government – at local, regional and national levels – at City Corporation events at Liberal Democrat, Labour, and Conservative party conferences respectively, while simultaneously ensuring that City Corporation events are enhanced by the expertise of the respective think-tanks.
    [Show full text]