DOCSLIB.ORG

House of Lords Reform Since 1997: a Chronology (Updated July 2009)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
House of Lords Reform Since 1997: a Chronology (Updated July 2009) House of Lords Reform Since 1997: A Chronology (updated July 2009) This House of Lords Library Note sets out in summary form the principal developments in House of Lords reform since the 1997 General Election. Chris Clarke and Matthew Purvis 31st July 2009 LLN 2009/007 House of Lords Library Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of the Notes with the Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. Any comments on Library Notes should be sent to the Head of Research Services, House of Lords Library, London SW1A 0PW or emailed to [email protected]. Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 1997 .................................................................................................................................. 2 1998 .................................................................................................................................. 2 1999 .................................................................................................................................. 3 2000 .................................................................................................................................. 4 2001 .................................................................................................................................. 5 2002 .................................................................................................................................. 6 2003 .................................................................................................................................. 8 2004 ................................................................................................................................ 17 2005 ................................................................................................................................ 22 2006 ................................................................................................................................ 27 2007 ................................................................................................................................ 44 2008 ................................................................................................................................ 64 2009 ................................................................................................................................ 72 Select Bibliography ......................................................................................................... 81 Introduction This House of Lords Library Note sets out in summary form the principal developments in House of Lords reform since the 1997 General Election. It updates a previous House of Lords Library Note, House of Lords Reform Since 1997: A Chronology (LLN 2008/018). It is primarily concerned with reform proposals in terms of the composition and powers of the House of Lords. It does not focus in detail on measures taken to reform the office of the Lord Chancellor and create the new Supreme Court to replace the Law Lords operating as a committee of the House of Lords. A number of Library Notes published by the House of Lords Library and Research Papers and Standard Notes published by the House of Commons Library have explored developments in House of Lords reform; these are all listed in the select bibliography at the end of the Library Note. The purpose of this Library Note is to provide a succinct account of the key events in a single document. Greater consideration is given to more recent developments. 1 April 1997 The Labour Party, the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats all included statements on House of Lords reform in their General Election manifestos. The Labour Party manifesto for the 1st May 1997 General Election stated that: The House of Lords must be reformed. As an initial, self-contained reform, not dependent on further reform in the future, the right of hereditary Peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords will be ended by statute. This will be the first stage in a process of reform to make the House of Lords more democratic and representative. The legislative powers of the House of Lords will remain unaltered. The system of appointment of life Peers to the House of Lords will be reviewed. Our objective will be to ensure that over time party appointees as life Peers more accurately reflect the proportion of votes cast at the previous general election. We are committed to maintaining an independent crossbench presence of life Peers. No one political party should seek a majority in the House of Lords. A committee of both Houses of Parliament will be appointed to undertake a wide- ranging review of possible further change and then to bring forward proposals for reform. (Labour Party, New Labour: Because Britain Deserves Better, April 1997, pp 32–33) 14th and 15th October 1998 The House of Lords conducted a two day debate on Lords reform (HL Hansard, cols 921–1042 and 1052–1166). The Lord Privy Seal, Baroness Jay of Paddington, moved a motion taking note of the Government’s proposals for reform of the House of Lords, as set out in the Labour Party manifesto, and announced the Government’s intention to establish a Royal Commission. Baroness Jay stated: The Government recognise that the broader constitutional settlement is both relevant and complicated. It will take time to bed down and assess. For those reasons we want to build on our manifesto proposal for a committee of both Houses of Parliament to consider further reform. We intend to appoint, first, a Royal Commission to undertake a wide-ranging review and to bring forward recommendations for further legislation. When the Royal Commission is formally established, we will set a time limit for it—a time limit for it to do its work and a time limit for it to report back to the Government. The Royal Commission is not a delaying tactic but it is right that there should be wider debate and further analysis before the long term is settled. Our detailed proposals on the role and working operations of the Royal Commission will be announced in the forthcoming White Paper. (HL Hansard, 14th October 1998, col 926) 2 24th November 1998 In the Queen’s Speech for the 1998–99 Session, it was announced that: “A Bill will be introduced to remove the right of hereditary Peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords. It will be the first stage in a process of reform to make the House of Lords more democratic and representative. My Government will publish a White Paper setting out arrangements for a new system of appointments of life Peers and establish a Royal Commission to review further changes and speedily to bring forward proposals for reform.” (HL Hansard, col 4). 19th January 1999 The House of Lords Bill was introduced to the House of Commons (HC Hansard, col 714). The Bill made provision for removing the right of hereditary Peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords. 20th January 1999 The Government published a White Paper, Modernising Parliament: Reforming the House of Lords (Cm 4183). Statements were heard in the Commons and the Lords announcing the publication of the White Paper, the setting up of an appointments commission to recommend non-party political life Peers and the establishment of a Royal Commission, with the following terms of reference: Having regard to the need to maintain the position of the House of Commons as the pre-eminent chamber of Parliament and taking particular account of the present nature of the constitutional settlement, including the newly devolved institutions, the impact of the Human Rights Act and developing relations with the European Union: to consider and make recommendations on the role and functions of a second chamber; and to make recommendations on the method or combination of methods of composition required to constitute a second chamber fit for that role and for those functions; to report by 31 December 1999. (HL Hansard, 20th January 1999, col 585) 11th November 1999 The House of Lords Act 1999 received Royal Assent. The Act removed the right of all but 92 hereditary Peers to sit in the House of Lords. 3 17th November 1999 In the Queen’s Speech for the 1999–2000 Session, the Government announced that it was “committed to further long-term reform of the House of Lords and will look forward to the recommendations of the Royal Commission on the Reform of the House of Lords” (HL Hansard, col 5). 20th January 2000 The Royal Commission on the Reform of the House of Lords, under the chairmanship of Lord Wakeham, published its report, A House for the Future (Cm 4534), making 132 recommendations. The Royal Commission’s report proposed that a reformed House of Lords would have around 550 members, with 65, 87 or 195 elected members. It recommended the creation of a statutory Appointments Commission to be responsible for all appointments to the Second Chamber. It did not propose any radical change in the balance of power between the two Houses of Parliament. 7th March 2000 The House of Lords debated the Royal Commission’s report (HL Hansard, cols 910–1036). Opening the debate, the Lord Privy Seal, Baroness Jay of Paddington, expressed the Government’s broad acceptance of the report: The Government accept the principles underlying the main elements of the Royal Commission’s proposals on the future role and structure of this House, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • House of Lords Reform 1997–2010: a Chronology
    House of Lords Reform 1997–2010: A Chronology This House of Lords Library Note sets out in summary form the principal developments in House of Lords reform under the Labour Government of 1997–2010. Chris Clarke and Matthew Purvis 28th June 2010 LLN 2010/015 House of Lords Library Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of the Notes with the Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. Any comments on Library Notes should be sent to the Head of Research Services, House of Lords Library, London SW1A 0PW or emailed to [email protected]. Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 1997 .................................................................................................................................. 2 1998 .................................................................................................................................. 2 1999 .................................................................................................................................. 3 2000 .................................................................................................................................. 4 2001 .................................................................................................................................. 5 2002 .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 16, 2019 • Merrill Auditorium
    PRESENTS MAY 15 - 16, 2019 • MERRILL AUDITORIUM BAKER NEWMAN NOYES AD Best of luck with your 2019 season JS MCCARTHY AD You dream it we print it. jsmccarthy.com 888 465 6241 JSM_Portland Ovation_Neverland Ad.indd 1 4/30/19 10:04 AM NETworks Presentations LLC presents BOOK BY MUSIC AND LYRICS BY James Graham Gary Barlow & Eliot Kennedy Based on the Miramax Motion Picture written by David Magee and the play The Man Who Was Peter Pan by Allan Knee STARRING Jeff Sullivan Ruby Gibbs WITH Conor McGiffin Emmanuelle Zeesman Brody Bett Seth Erdley Caleb Reese Paul Paul Schoeller Josiah Smothers Ethan Stokes AND Emilia Brown Marie Choate Josh Dunn Ashley Edler Joshua William Green Daniel S. Hayward Benjamin Henley Elizabeth Lester Michael Luongo André Malcolm Spenser Micetich Melody Rose Kelsey Seaman Adrien Swenson Josh McWhortor SCENIC DESIGNER COSTUME DESIGNER LIGHTING DESIGNER SOUND DESIGNER PROJECTION DESIGNER Scott Pask Suttirat Anne Larlarb Kenneth Posner Shannon Slaton Jon Driscoll HAIR & MAKE UP DESIGNER ILLUSIONS AIR SCULPTOR FLYING EFFECTS Bernie Ardia Paul Kieve Daniel Wurtzel Hudson Scenic Studio ORIGINAL MUSIC SUPERVISION VOCAL DESIGNER MUSIC DIRECTOR MUSIC COORDINATOR AND DANCE AND INCIDENTAL MUSICAL ARRANGER AnnMarie Milazzo Patrick Hoagland John Mezzio David Chase ANIMAL DIRECTOR CASTING TOUR BOOKING TOUR PRESS & MARKETING William Berloni Stewart/Whitley The Booking Group Anita Dloniak & Meredith Blair Associates, Inc. GENERAL MANAGER COMPANY MANAGER PRODUCTION STAGE MANAGER PRODUCTION MANAGER GENTRY & ASSOCIATES NETWORKS PRESENTATIONS LLC Jamey Jennings Heather Moss David D’Agostino Evan Rooney EXECUTIVE PRODUCER ASSOCIATE CHOREOGRAPHER Trinity Wheeler Camden Loeser ORCHESTRATIONS Simon Hale MUSIC SUPERVISION Fred Lassen CHOREOGRAPHY Mia Michaels DIRECTION RECREATED BY Mia Walker ORIGINAL DIRECTION Diane Paulus Finding Neverland was developed and premiered at The American Repertory Theater at Harvard University, Diane Paulus, Artistic Director, Diane Borger, Producer.
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Scenes
    behind the scenes Written by Sam Maynard Rehearsal photography by Manuel Harlan Production photography by Johan Persson CONTENTS BACKGROUNDPRODUCTIONRESOURCES Contents Introduction 3 Section 1: Background to Privacy 4 James Graham and PRIVACY 5 Verbatim Theatre 6 PRIVACY and Political Theatre 8 Edward Snowden, the NSA and GCHQ 9 Edward Snowden 9 The NSA revelations 10 What do these revelations mean? 12 Real people in PRIVACY 14 Section 2: The Donmar’s Production 17 Cast and Creative Team 18 Josh Seymour’s Rehearsal Diary 19 A conversation with James Graham 24 A conversation with Josie Rourke 29 Section 3: RESOURCES 33 A Glossary of Key Terms used in PRIVACY 34 Practical Exercise for use in the classroom 37 Select Bibliography and Suggestions for further reading 40 About the Donmar Warehouse 41 2 CONTENTS BACKGROUNDPRODUCTIONRESOURCES Introduction Welcome to the Behind the Scenes Guide to PRIVACY, a new play by James Graham. Over the following pages you will find a wealth of information designed to give you a closer look at the process of developing this production, from the original ideas to the final performance. PRIVACY is James Graham’s first play to be staged at the Donmar Warehouse, and tackles one of the most important issues of our time. Drawing on interviews with journalists, politicians, and analysts, PRIVACY asks how much we give away when we share, and whether there really is such a thing as privacy anymore. This guide aims to set this production in context through discussions with the cast and creative teams, through summaries of some of the key events referred to in the production, rehearsal diaries, and more.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Labour Party and the Reform of the House of Lords, 1918 to Date
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1960 The rB itish Labour Party and the reform of the House of Lords, 1918 to date. Yousan Wang University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Wang, Yousan, "The rB itish Labour Party and the reform of the House of Lords, 1918 to date." (1960). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 2557. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/2557 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BRUiSH LABOUR PART/ THE REFORM OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS, 1918 TO DATE YU SAN WANG 1960 THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY AND THE REPOEM OF THE HOUSE OP LORDS, I9I8 TO DATE Yu San Wang Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Massachusetts Amherst August , i960 TABLE OP CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II, A BRIEF HISTORY OP EFFORTS WITHIN THE LABOUR PARTY TO REFORM THE HOUSE OP LORDS, 1918 TO dak: 8 III. THE REFORM OF THE POWERS OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS 30 IV, PROPOSALS FOR MINOR MODIFICATIONS OP THE COMPOSITION OP THE HOUSE OP LORDS , , , , 46 V, PROPOSALS FOR THE WHOLESALE RECONSTRUCTION OP THE HOUSE OP LORDS 62 VI, PROPOSALS FOE THE ABOLITION OF THE HOUSE OP LORDS 71 VII, CONCLUSION AND PROSPECTS FOR THE FUTURE .
    [Show full text]
  • This House Exploring the Play at Home
    This House Exploring the Play at Home If you’re watching This House at home and would like to find out more out the production, there are a number of different resources that you can explore. About the Production This production of This House by James Graham was first performed at the National Theatre in 2012. The production was directed by Jeremy Herrin. The play explores life in the corridors of Westminster in 1974. You can find full details of the cast and production team below: Cast Labour Whips Bob Mellish: Phil Daniels Walter Harrison: Reece Dinsdale Michael Cocks/ Joe Harper: Vincent Franklin Ann Taylor: Lauren O’Neil Tory Whips Humphrey Atkins: Julian Wadham Jack Weatherill: Charles Edwards Fred Silvester: Ed Hughes The Members Chorus Clockmaker/Peebles/ Redditch/ Birmingham Perry Barr: Gunnar Cauthery Woolwich West/Batley & Morley/ Western Isles: Christopher Godwin Walsall North/Serjeant at Arms Act I/ Speaker Act II/Plymouth Sutton: Andrew Havill Rochester & Chatham/Welwyn & Hatfield/ Coventry South West/Lady Batley: Helena Lymbery Paddington South/Chelmsford/ South Ayrshire/Henley: Matthew Pidgeon Speaker Act I/Mansfield/ Serjeant at Arms Act II/ West Lothian: Giles Taylor Bromsgrove/Abingdon/ Liverpool Edge Hill/ Paisley/Fermanagh: Tony Turner Esher/Belfast West: Rupert Vansittart All other parts played by members of the Company Musicians Acoustic Jim & The Wires: Jim Hustwit (Music Director/guitar), Sam Edgington (bass) and Cristiano Castellitto (drums). Guest Vocals: Gunnar Cauthery and Phil Daniels Creative Team Director: Jeremy Herrin Designer: Rae Smith Lighting Designer: Paul Anderson Music: Stephen Warbeck Choreographer: Scott Ambler Sound Designer : Ian Dickinson Associate Director: Joe Murphy Original Lighting Designer: Paule Constable Company Voice Work: Richard Ryder Dialect Coach: Penny Dyer You might like to use the internet to research some of these artists to find out more about their careers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ltc) Announce Creative Learning Symposium at the Lyric Hammersmith Monday 5 February 2018
    PRESS RELEASE 2 FEBRUARY 2018 LONDON THEATRE CONSORTIUM (LTC) ANNOUNCE CREATIVE LEARNING SYMPOSIUM AT THE LYRIC HAMMERSMITH MONDAY 5 FEBRUARY 2018 London Theatre Consortium (LTC) have organised a symposium to address the challenge of the current national curriculum syllabi focusing on representation and diversity in the classroom and improving career pathways into the performing arts. The LTC Creative Learning Symposium; A Future Curriculum for Drama Education will be held on Monday 5th February, 5.30pm – 8.30pm at the Lyric Hammersmith. The aim of the LTC Creative Learning Symposium, which involves a panel discussion, breakout groups and open space sessions, is to bring theatres, writers, artists and teachers together in the hope of making an impact on set text choices and forming stronger relationships across education sectors. Invited participants are made up of creatives on the syllabus - writers, directors, companies - teachers, young people, and exam board and theatre representatives. Timings: 5pm- 5.30pm: Arrival, registration and refreshments 5.30pm: Welcome Note from The Lyric Hammersmith's Artistic Director Sean Holmes and Executive Director Sian Alexander 5.35pm: The Future of Drama Education Panel Discussion. This panel will explore the current curriculum and opportunities for the future, drawing on the experience of the panel. Chaired by Vishni Velada-Billson: Head of Participation at the Royal Court Theatre With: Kwame Kwei-Armah: Artistic Director of the Young Vic James Graham: Playwright (Ink, Labour of Love, This House,
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMER 2020 INTERVIEW COMMENT CLIMATE by Anticipations
    By Anticipations INTERVIEW COMMENT CLIMATE SUMMER James Graham, The bright future of UBI Cities post-pandemic 2020 Playwright p.2 p.14 p.5 & 8 “ NOW IS THE TIME FOR ONE FINAL PUSH TO KNOCK DOWN THE DOOR TO A MORE SUSTAINABLE FUTURE. ” JACK PARKER, P10 CONTENTS ADAM ALLNUTT IN THIS ISSUE FROM THE CHAIR elcome to the summer edition improved the culture in the Young Fabians Editor’s Column P1 Wof our new look Anticipations – creating a decentralised productive James Graham on the future of theatre P2 Magazine. environment where activists feel P4 Our reach this year has been empowered to produce brilliant pieces of The parasite and the virus phenomenal. We’ve sent several work. The Young Fabians and Fabianism New horizons P5 delegations to events across Europe and is in the ascendancy with open discussion, P6 hosted the Young European Socialist debate and thought leadership at its core. Education after lockdown Bureau. We’re launching the Young I cannot thank each and every member Our international future P7 Scottish Fabians, Young Welsh Fabians enough for the effort you have put in to P8 and regional groups across England. We create an atmosphere that people want to Forging the path will be launching a complete YF re-brand join. Beyond ‘Big Society’ P9 across the society, the networks, the As we look to an uncertain future I nations and the regions. We were early am filled with confidence that the next Pushing open the door to a green future P10 adopters of Zoom events and have hosted generation of leaders are developing their A National Care Service P11 over 100 virtual events across a wide skills here.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Back Control: Why the House of Commons Should Govern
    DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE TAKING BACK CONTROL WHY THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SHOULD GOVERN ITS OWN TIME MEG RUSSELL AND DANIEL GOVER TAKING BACK CONTROL WHY THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SHOULD GOVERN ITS OWN TIME Meg Russell and Daniel Gover The Constitution Unit University College London January 2021 ISBN: 978-1-903903-90-2 Published by: The Constitution Unit School of Public Policy University College London 29-31 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU Tel: 020 7679 4977 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit ©The Constitution Unit, UCL 2021 This report is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. First Published January 2021 Front cover image by Vladimir Wrangel, cropped by the Constitution Unit. Contents List of boxes and tables ................................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Foreword by Sir David Natzler ....................................................................................................................... 4 Executive summary ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Thatcher Iron Lady Speech Transcript
    Margaret Thatcher Iron Lady Speech Transcript Sebastiano is scaly and mobilised admittedly while unvocal Maddy erect and bloat. Joshuah formulises his courlans preconsumed whiles, but potted Uriel never scorches so masculinely. Reciprocal Myron sometimes inch any denunciators temporised normally. And clinton had proved wrong to continue the speech thatcher looks like The iron lady have odd consequences for britain at each other powerful forces. Thatcher called the principal Lady as a Soviet journalist embodied a. Margaret Thatcher the Iron work of British politics who died Monday. Watch your character as south sudan in a previous seasons was virtually abandoned, this century britain at wbur investigative team of liberty and. Margaret thatcher and speech and our trading attitudes on an iron lady thatcher? Margaret Thatcher's BRILLIANT reaction to 'most Lady' nickname revealed. Transcripts for St Louis Public Radio produced programming are available. If margaret thatcher an iron lady will save this? Of beauty woman who trek to kill known as the knight Lady pass by emotion. This transcript provided for joining me to achieve grand, ladies room on what has done for this is stronger. Margaret Thatcher From Grocer's Daughter to embrace Lady John Campbell Transcript of telephone conversation 9 November 199 Bush papers OAID CFO. So much exaggerated by npr for like true war begets war is becoming harder and socially progressive ideologies. Social Science. The Falklands War 192 Transcript. What did you do it has ceased to send your financial framework is not mere cyphers to. Tory leader of iron ladies and running a joint approach to our weekly exploration of commons pqs.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Documentation Disrupting Ontologies
    DOCTORAL THESIS Performance/documentation disrupting ontologies Read, Claire Award date: 2018 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 PerformanceDocumentation: Disrupting Ontologies by Claire Louise Read BA, MA A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD Department of Drama, Theatre and Performance University of Roehampton 2017 1 ABSTRACT This thesis looks at live-streaming between 2006-2016, taking London’s National Theatre as its focus. Looking at the use of technology, specifically live- streaming, the thesis considers the effect of live-streaming both in and of performance in relation to ‘performance’ and ‘documentation’. I question the ontological nature of performance and documentation, conventionally considered to work in a causal, linear relationship, and identify a mutual, non-linear relationship between the two states enabled via live-streaming. I use the chemical term of ‘sublimation’ to express this relationship indicated by a double-headed arrow that speaks as a reimagined model to illustrate the oscillating, cyclical movement that I propose between performance and documentation.
    [Show full text]
  • The LABOUR PARTY Andtheworld
    vickers.cov 15/9/03 3:15 pm Page 1 HIS is the first book in a two-volume set The that traces the evolution of the Labour TheLABOUR PARTY TParty’s foreign policy throughout the LABOUR PARTY twentieth century and into the early years and theWORLD of the new millennium. and theWORLD Volume1 This is the first comprehensive study of the political ideology and history of the The EVOLUTION of Labour Party’s world-view and foreign policy. It argues that the development of LABOUR’SFOREIGN Labour’s foreign policy perspective should POLICY be seen not as the development of a socialist foreign policy, but as an Volume1 1900–51 The EVOLUTION LABOUR’S of application of the ideas of liberal 1900–51 POLICY FOREIGN internationalism. Rhiannon Vickers The first volume outlines and assesses the early development and evolution of Labour’s world-view. It then follows the course of the Labour party’s foreign policy during a tumultuous period on the international stage, including the First World War, the Russian Revolution, the Spanish Civil War, the build up to and violent reality of the Second World War, and the start of the Cold War. This highly readable book provides an excellent analysis of Labour’s foreign policy during the period in which Labour experienced power for the first time. It is essential reading for students of British Vickers political history in the twentieth century, international relations and British foreign policy. Rhiannon Vickers is a Lecturer in the Department of Politics at the University of Sheffield COVER PHOTOGRAPH—New Yorkers cheer
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit – the Political Implications: a Post-Conservative Party Conference View by Lord David Hunt, Partner – DAC Beachcroft
    Brexit – The Political Implications: A Post-Conservative Party Conference View by Lord David Hunt, Partner – DAC Beachcroft We have seen a significant hardening of the Prime Minister's position on Brexit, with her speech at the Conservative Party Conference in early October. Inevitably, the entire conference took place under the shadow of Brexit and we now know the Prime Minister intends to make the UK's withdrawal application under Article 50 by the end of March 2017. She supported the Remain campaign before the referendum, but she sounds increasingly like a genuine convert to the Leave cause, inclining towards "Hard Brexit" – leaving not only the political aspects of the EU, but also the Single Market. This is principally an acknowledgement of political reality, but already a significant number of Conservative MPs have indicated their strong support for remaining within the Single Market. Under the arrangements that currently prevail, that would of course require the continuation of free movement of citizens, as well as of goods, services and capital. The Prime Minister's “honeymoon” is not yet over, but there will have to be much coalition building within Parliament. Immediately upon her appointment, Theresa May took steps to give the country some breathing space. This resulted in the President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, talking of building a new partnership with the UK, of our shared common interests and of friendship rather than categorical and immediate action. She also charged ministers with evolving a clear approach to Brexit and clarifying exactly what we are asking other countries to agree.
    [Show full text]