REFORMING AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES “No Regrets” Policies for Livelihoods and the Environment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

REFORMING AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES “No Regrets” Policies for Livelihoods and the Environment WRI WHITE PAPER REFORMING AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES “No Regrets” Policies for Livelihoods and the Environment ANTONIO LA VINA LINDSEY FRANSEN 10 G Street, NE Suite 800 Washington, DC 20002 PAUL FAETH www.wri.org YUKO KURAUCHI WRI WHITE PAPER REFORMING AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES: “NO REGRETS” POLICIES FOR LIVELIHOODS AND THE ENVIRONMENT Antonio La Vina Lindsey Fransen Paul Faeth Yuko Kurauchi washington, dc JEN LESAR EDITOR HYACINTH BILLINGS PUBLICATIONS DIRECTOR MAGGIE POWELL LAYOUT Each World Resources Institute report represents a timely, scholarly Cover Photographs: treatment of a subject of public concern. WRI takes responsibility for Cotton Harvest: FAO photo choosing the study topics and guaranteeing its authors and researchers freedom of inquiry. It also solicits and responds to the guidance of Corn Harvest: Photo by Bruce Fritz, USDA Agricultural advisory panels and expert reviewers. Unless otherwise stated, however, Research Service all the interpretation and findings set forth in WRI publications are Forest: FAO/17810/A. Conti those of the authors. Meeting: FAO photo Copyright © 2006 World Resources Institute. All rights reserved. ISBN 1-56973-617-0 Printed in the United States of America on chlorine-free paper with recycled content of 50%, 20% of which is post-consumer. Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . .iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . .1 INTRODUCTION . .2 SETTING THE STAGE: AGRICULTURE, POVERTY, TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT . .5 WHAT ARE THE IMPACTS OF AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES ON THE POOR AND THE ENVIRONMENT? . .6 What are the Impacts in Developed Countries? What are the Impacts in Developing Countries? REFORMING DEVELOPING COUNTRY SUBSIDIES: POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES FOR LIVELIHOODS AND THE ENVIRONMENT . .9 Impacts in Subsidizing Countries Impacts in Developing Countries THE ROLE OF A DOMESTIC POLICY REFORM AGENDA . .13 Empowering Small-Scale Farmers to Use and Protect Natural Resources Mainstreaming Poverty Alleviation and Environment Protecting Ecosystems for Human Well-being Best Practices in Governance CONCLUSION . .21 REFERENCES . .24 NOTES . .27 Acknowledgments This White Paper was produced as part of the World Frances Seymour for review and support of this publi- Resources Institute’s Poverty, Agriculture and Trade cation. Xander Slaski provided research assistance. Objective. An earlier version of this publication, enti- The authors and the World Resources Institute also tled Beyond The Doha Round and the Agricultural extend their thanks to the reviewers of the manu- Subsidies Debate: Toward a Reform Agenda for script, Vice Yu, Ann Thrupp, and Kimberly Pfeifer. Livelihoods and the Environment, was launched at the Their comments provided valuable insight and helped fifth ministerial meeting of the World Trade to improve the document; the final paper does not Organization in Hong Kong in December, 2005. necessarily reflect their views. The authors gratefully acknowledge colleagues Peter This publication was made possible through the gen- Veit, Liz Marshall, and Jenny Guiling for review and erous support of the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign revision of this manuscript; and David Jhirad and Affairs. REFORMING AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Trade can be an effective vehicle for poverty reduction (Cline 2004), but good governance, at both interna- Agricultural subsidies are among a number of factors tional and national levels, is necessary so that determining whether and how agriculture can help increased trade benefits the poor, and prevents or the poor and protect ecosystems. Reforming the cur- minimizes ecosystem degradation (WRI 2005). This rent agricultural subsidies system in developed coun- White Paper examines what reforms developing tries, a central goal of the Doha Round1 negotiations countries need to implement so that they can capital- of the World Trade Organization, provides an oppor- ize on reductions in developed country subsidies. It tunity to generate a number of positive impacts: for recommends that countries adopt and implement a poor farmers in developing countries whose ability to domestic policy reform agenda that is based on a compete is hampered by subsidy-driven overproduc- national assessment of the potential impacts of global tion in rich countries; for taxpayers and consumers in trade decisions on ecosystem health and human well- developed countries faced with rising deficits; for the being. The paper also recognizes the necessity of environment in developed countries where subsidies cooperation and support from development agencies contribute to ecosystem degradation; and, possibly, and other international organizations in order to for the environment in developing countries where overcome the resource constraints that will be faced poverty is one driver of environmental degradation. by many developing countries in the implementation But an agreement to reduce subsidies at the interna- of such reforms. While every country will have to tional level does not guarantee that the poor and the develop its own package of reforms based on its environment will benefit; the realization of benefits unique physical, socio-economic, and political cir- will require the implementation of strategic domestic cumstances, the paper identifies four areas to be policies in developing nations. addressed by policy-makers and supported by donors. Even in the absence of subsidy reduction through the These include policies designed to: Doha Round, countries can take steps to make agri- culture work for the poor and for the environment. ● Empower small-scale farmers to use natural Without a WTO agreement, there will still be resources sustainably and strengthen their ability immense pressure on developed countries to reduce to negotiate with other actors in the market with their agricultural subsidies: from developing coun- respect to the use of land and other inputs to agri- tries, which are expected to file more cases in the cultural production; WTO challenging these subsidies, and from within developed countries because of domestic or regional ● Mainstream poverty alleviation and environmental (in the case of the European Union) competition for considerations into sectoral plans focused on agri- scarce budgetary resources. Moreover, without a new culture; WTO Agreement, trade-induced changes that affect ● Promote ecosystem health for human well-being, agriculture are inevitable, whether they come in the in particular ecosystems’ ability to provide essen- context of global, regional, or bilateral trade agree- tial services; and ments or through sheer market changes. Domestic policies that make agriculture pro-poor and pro-envi- ● Promote best practices in governance. ronment are ‘no regrets’ policies, and countries that adopt them are not only likely to be more prepared The paper concludes with a set of policy recommen- for the changes that will come with a new trade dations under each of these categories. agreement, but will be better able to position their agricultural sectors to be effective agents for poverty alleviation and environmental sustainability. 2 REFORMING AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES Policy Recommendations Laws, policies, and programs to empower poor farmers should: ● Introduction of new technologies; and ● Transport services in rural areas. ● Provide for rights-based land tenure policies, including agrarian reform laws and recognition of indigenous peoples’ territories; Laws, rules, and regulations related to agriculture that protect ecosystems and their ability to provide for essential ecosystem serv- ● Provide a supportive environment for community enterprises, ices include: such as production and marketing cooperatives; ● Establish economic incentives for poor farmers to use land and ● Support for soil conservation practices that address land degra- other resources sustainably, including direct compensation for dation and are designed for the benefit of poor farmers; conservation activities, public goods, and ecosystem services; ● Facilitation of crop diversification, recycling and conservation of and soil nutrients and organic matter, and ecologically-based inte- ● Allow for payments to landowners in return for land management grated pest and disease management; that protects ecosystem services, such as water quality and car- ● Flexibility and diversity in marketing standards to enable retail bon storage. food stores and distributors to diversify varieties of produce and Macroeconomic policies and measures that integrate poverty allevia- reduce wasteful cosmetic standards for foods in markets. tion and environmental goals should include policies that regulate: Reforms to promote better governance of the agricultural sector include: ● Pricing and trading of farm products; ● Property or access rights over land and water; ● Accountable decentralization; ● Taxation of land and agricultural assets; ● Establishment of inter-agency and multi-stakeholder processes in agriculture; and ● Rural credit and insurance; ● Strengthened enforcement of environmental laws, rules, and reg- ● Use of agrochemical inputs; ulations. This reform agenda, outlined in the following pages, INTRODUCTION is relevant to development organizations such as In December 2005, trade ministers and other offi- bilateral assistance agencies, multilateral cooperation cials from all over the world assembled in Hong institutions, private foundations, and development Kong to attend the Sixth Ministerial Conference of NGOs. It can serve as a guide for these organizations’ the World Trade Organization (WTO). For six days, financial and technical
Recommended publications
  • Agricultural Subsidies in the GCC: Between Cost and Benefit
    Journal of Business and Economics, ISSN 2155-7950, USA April 2014, Volume 5, No. 4, pp. 573-595 DOI: 10.15341/jbe(2155-7950)/04.05.2014/012 Academic Star Publishing Company, 2014 http://www.academicstar.us Agricultural Subsidies in the GCC: Between Cost and Benefit — The Case of Kuwait Faten Jabsheh, Weam Behbehani, Noura Abdulmalek (Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), Kuwait) Abstract: Agricultural reform has become of pivotal interest for many governments in response to the requirements of globalization and economic liberalization, which are embodied in the World Trade Organization (WTO). In Kuwait agricultural reform, which is essentially a reform of the subsidy program operated by the government takes on an additional simultaneous objective-and that is in fact designated as one of the priorities for the government—to increase the productivity and efficiency of the sector’s utility of the subsidies that are allocated to the agricultural sector, which today exceed, K.D 100 million, a 25% increase over the previous year (Al Watan, 2012). Hence, it has become essential for the concerned authorities in the State of Kuwait to review, evaluate and reconsider the current and prevalent agricultural subsidy program, in order to present a strategy to restructure agricultural subsidies that is constructive to the agricultural sector in Kuwait and permissible by the WTO since Kuwait is a member. Integral to this process is a thorough economic impact analysis of consumers and producers, in order to consider the expected economic and
    [Show full text]
  • The EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and Its Effects on Trade
    The EU common agricultural policy (CAP) and its effects on trade Programme Economics, Trade and Policy Master thesis 1st year, 15 ECTS Author: Linda Rydén, 871219 Supervisors: Professor Börje Johansson PhD Candidate Peter Warda Jönköping May 2013 Acknowledgements I want to thank my supervisors Professor Börje Johansson and PhD Candidate Peter Warda for their comments and patience throughout the process of writing this master thesis. They provided interesting input and useful corrections when needed, and for that I am grateful. Thank you also to my discussant Alfredo Hidalgo Arreola and co-examinor Professor Thomas Holgersson for your suggestions and remarks. I finally offer my regards to all of those who supported me in any way during the comple- tion of this thesis, especially to my fellow students with excellent computer and language skills. LR 871219 Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................ 2 1. Introduction ................................................................................ 3 1.1 Background and purpose ....................................................................... 3 1.2 Outline ................................................................................................... 3 2. The EU common agricultural policy (CAP) ............................. 5 2.1 History of the CAP ................................................................................. 5 2.2 CAP policies and effects on trade .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Looting of Africa Titulo Bond, Patrick
    The Looting of Africa Titulo Bond, Patrick - Autor/a Autor(es) Globalization and the Washington Consensus : its influence on democracy and En: development in the south Buenos Aires Lugar CLACSO, Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales Editorial/Editor 2008 Fecha Sur-Sur Colección Exportaciones; Agotamiento de recursos; Petróleo; Inversiones extranjeras directas; Temas Desigualdad; Subdesarrollo; Imperialismo; Pobreza; Subsidios; Agricultura; Deuda ecológica; África; Capítulo de Libro Tipo de documento http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/clacso/sur-sur/20100707033344/07bond.pdf URL Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 2.0 Genérica Licencia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.es Segui buscando en la Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de CLACSO http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO) Conselho Latino-americano de Ciências Sociais (CLACSO) Latin American Council of Social Sciences (CLACSO) www.clacso.edu.ar Bond, Patrick. The looting of Africa. En publicación: Globalization and the Washington Consensus: its influence on democracy and development in the south. Gladys Lechini (editor). Buenos Aires : CLACSO, Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales, 2008. ISBN 978-987-1183-91-3 Disponible en: http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/ar/libros/sursur/lech/07bond.pdf Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales de América Latina y el Caribe de la Red CLACSO http://www.biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/ [email protected] Patrick Bond* The Looting of Africa Introduction Unequal trade and investment relationships are nothing new for Af- rica, although beginning in 2005 the world’s attention was drawn to Africa’s plight as never before. However, in contrast to the neo-or- thodox strategy implied by Gordon Brown, Bono, Bob Geldoff and other mainstream campaigners, Africa’s deepening integration into the world economy has typically generated not wealth but the out- flow of wealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Food and the Environment, Swedish Strategy for the Future of EU
    To the Cabinet Minister and Head of the Ministry of Agriculture On 27 July 1995 the Swedish government decided to set up a parliamentary committee with the aim of developing, from a Swedish perspective, a comprehensive proposal for reform of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). On 6 October 1995 the Head of the Ministry of Agriculture appointed the Director General and Head of the Swedish Board of Agriculture, Svante Englund, as chairman of the committee and, as members of the committee, the Members of Parliament Bo Bernardsson, Sinnikka Bohlin, Lennart Brunander, Inge Carlsson, Dan Ericsson, Ann- Kristine Johansson, Gudrun Lindvall, Leif Marklund, Maggi Mikaelsson and Carl G. Nilsson, and also research student Cecilia Malmström. On 28 December 1995 Member of Parliament Bengt Kronblad was appointed as a member to replace Bo Bernardsson with effect from 1 January 1996. On 6 October 1995 Principal Administrative Officer at the Swedish Board of Agriculture Hans G. Öhgren was appointed secretary to the committee, and on 7 December Anna Lagerkvist (née Österling), Administrative Officer at the Swedish Board of Agriculture, was appointed deputy secretary. On 7 December the following special advisers were appointed to the committee: Arne Gabrielsson, Director of the Federation of Swedish Food Industries, research secretary Lars Erik Hellberg of the Swedish Agricultural Union, farmer Eva Karin Hempel of the Federation of Swedish Farmers, and research secretary Mikael Kullberg of the Swedish Food Workers’ Union. On the same day the following experts were appointed: First Secretaries Carl Asplund, Ministry of Finance, and Håkan Björklund, Ministry for Foreign Affairs, the Assistant Under- Secretary Johan Bodegård, Ministry of the Environment, and Assistant Under-Secretaries Anders Klum and Dag von Schantz of the Ministry of Agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Agricultural Subsidies to Smallholder Maize Farmers of Mbeya District Council in Tanzania
    IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES TO SMALLHOLDER MAIZE FARMERS OF MBEYA DISTRICT COUNCIL IN TANZANIA THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Christopher Lameck Graduate Program in Agricultural and Extension Education The Ohio State University 2016 Master's Examination Committee: Dr. Scott Scheer, Advisor Dr. Jerry Thomas Copyrighted by Christopher Lameck 2016 Abstract Tanzania depends on agriculture for food production. It is an industry which is occupied mostly by smallholder farmers who on average cultivate less than one hectare of land. To smallholder farmers, farming is a as household activity implemented at the subsistence level. The government of Tanzania launched the Subsidy Program as a bridge to shift subsistence farming to farming as a business and to promote food secure households. Food insecurity was associated by low rate of application of fertilizers and usage of improved seeds among smallholder farmers due to fertilizer and seed costs which led to an increase in food prices. These conditions were the major reasons for launching of the Subsidy Program. This study aimed at assessing the impact of the agricultural subsidies to smallholder maize farmers. The study had four research objectives focusing agricultural productivity, food security, usage of improved inputs, and farmers’ perception on how the program functioned. The study used an ex post facto research design to analyze 120 smallholder farmers in areas where subsidy programs operated. The investigation involved 60 smallholder farmers who received subsidies and 60 who did not. These farmers were ii selected from their respective households from four different wards (i.e., 15 smallholder farmers who received subsidies and 15 smallholder farmers who did not receive subsides).
    [Show full text]
  • THE ECONOMICS of AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES Xiri ,0
    THE ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES xiri ,0 Stellingen 1. De stelligheid waarmee macro-economische voorspellingen worden gepresenteerd staat vaak in schril contrast met de betrouwbaarheid van deze voorspellingen. 2. Studenten in de economie kunnen meer inspiratie opdoen door van Keynes te lezen dan door over Keynes te lezen. 3. Het beleid inzake het verminderen van handelsbelemmeringen tegen export van ontwikkelingslanden dient meer afgestemd te worden op de exportbehoefte van ontwikkelingslanden dan op de gewenste bescher- ming van eigen produktie. 4. De levensvatbaarheid van een uitgebreide E.G. is onder meer afhan- kelijk. van een politieke aanvaarding van agrarische inkomensverschillen die ontstaan zijn door verschillen in economische efficiency. Een eerste stäp in de richting van deze acceptatie is de recente consensus om output subsidies aan kwantitatieve bovengrenzen te binden. 5. Popper's adagium, dat een theorie die veel uitsluit waardevo ler is dan een die weinig uitsluit maar vaker bevestigd wordt, lijkt bij veel maatschappij-wetenschappelijk onderzoek een ondergeschikte rol te spelen. 6. De invloed van een aantal specifieke eigenschappen van de E.ngelse taal op Wittgenstein's latere denken inzake begripsvorming zcu een nadere Studie verdienen. 7. "Gesundes Volksempfinden" is gevaarlijk als enige bron van recht, maar de huidige Nederlandse strafrechtpleging lijkt deze bron geheel te veronachtzamen hetgeen kan leiden tot rechtsvervreemding. 8. Het is eenvoudiger een xenofobe politieke stroming te verocrdelen dan de oorzaken ervan weg te nemen. 9. Wanneer de huidige criminaliteit een toenemende functie is van jeugd- werkloosheid en politioneel personeelstekort, dienen met meer spoed en creativiteit extra vacatures bij de politie vervuld te worden door werkloze jongeren.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Agricultural Subsidies for Improved Environmental Outcomes
    Reforming Agricultural Subsidies for Improved Environmental Outcomes by Abdullah Mamun, Will Martin, Simla Tokgoz International Food Policy Research Institute 6 September 2019 Executive Summary Does agricultural support contribute to environmental degradation? Agricultural production and land use change leave a significant environmental footprint. They are responsible for roughly a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Support measures promoting agricultural production with existing technologies therefore likely contribute to environmental degradation and climate change. However, assessing the impact is not straightforward, as environmental outcomes depend on how agricultural policies influence the mix of goods produced and how those goods are produced. The present study addresses two key questions in this context: (i) what are the implications of existing support measures for agricultural output and emissions? and (ii) how might these support measures be repurposed to help improve environmental, social, and nutritional outcomes? Governments provide near US$600 billion in agricultural subsidies every year Globally, agricultural support is very substantial, with farmers in 51 key countries receiving US$483 billion per year between 2015 and 2017, enough to raise their returns by 18 percent on average. The same set of countries spent US$86 billion per year on public goods that create enabling conditions for agriculture, such as agricultural innovation systems and rural infrastructure. Given the extremely high returns estimated
    [Show full text]
  • Oecd Workshop on Environmentally Harmful Subsidies
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OECD WORKSHOP ON ENVIRONMENTALLY HARMFUL SUBSIDIES SUBSIDIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT: AN OVERVIEW OF THE STATE OF KNOWLEDGE Gareth PORTER, Independent Consultant, United States Paris, 7-8 November 2002 This paper is presented in Session 2.1 at the OECD Workshop on Environmentally Harmful Subsidies, held at the IEA, (International Energy Agency) 9 rue de la Fédération, 75015 Paris. Registration is from 8h30-9h30 on 7 November 2002. An earlier version of this document was previously circulated to the 2-4 July 2002 meeting of the Joint Working Party on Trade and Environment, for INFORMATION, under the code COM/ENV/TD(2002)59. It has been revised and updated in light of written comments received from the delegations of Australia, Canada, Japan and the European Commission. However, the views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the IEA/OECD or its Member countries. The workshop is organised by the Directorate of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries; in close co-operation with the Environment; Trade; and Science, Technology and Industry Directorates; the IEA and ECMT. Contact Person: Ronald STEENBLIK, ECH/TPL: Tel. (33-1) 45 24 95 29; Fax (33-1) 44 30 61 63; email: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBSIDIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT: THE STATE OF KNOWLEDGE......................................... 3 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Agriculture.....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Subsidies and Their Impacts on Food Security and Poverty Reduction
    Draft chapter for Robinson, G., D Schmallegger and J Cleary (eds) Handbook on The Globalisation of Agriculture. Edward Elgar Heroes, villains and victims: agricultural subsidies and their impacts on food security and poverty reduction Andrew Dorward, SOAS, University of London Jamie Morrison, Food and Agriculture Organization 1 Abstract: Subsidies have been a pervasive feature of agricultural policy in both high and low income countries. This chapter describes different kinds of subsidies and reviews evidence on their economic, food security and poverty impacts. The evidence suggests that different subsidy programmes have had in some contexts profoundly positive and in other contexts profoundly negative impacts on food security and on the livelihoods of poor people and poor societies. Discussions of the historical and potential roles of subsidies and their more recent use have, however, been the victim of an unhealthy over-emphasis on their negative effects without sufficient consideration of the potential to overcome these. These issues need to be addressed if agricultural subsidies are to fulfill their potential to make a significant contribution in addressing continuing and emerging challenges to food insecurity and poverty. 1 Disclaimer: the views expressed in this chapter are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 1. Introduction This chapter reviews evidence on the food security and poverty impacts of different agricultural subsidies in developed and developing countries. The two main parts of the chapter examine historical experience and theoretical analysis first of developed country subsidies’ and then of developing country subsidies’ impacts on food security and poverty, in developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Impact of the Current CAP on the Agriculture Of
    Commission for Natural Resources Evaluation of the impact NAT of the current CAP on the agriculture of developing countries © European Union, 2019 Partial reproduction is permitted, provided that the source is explicitly mentioned. More information on the European Union and the Committee of the Regions is available online at http://www.europa.eu and http://www.cor.europa.eu respectively. Catalogue number: QG-03-19-654-EN-N; ISBN: 978-92-895-1025-7; doi:10.2863/81237 This report was written by Alan Matthews and Rossella Soldi (Progress Consulting S.r.l., Italy). It does not represent the official views of the European Committee of the Regions. Table of contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 Part 1 Review of the previous studies on the impact of current CAP subsidies on the price of the EU food produced and exported to developing countries ............. 5 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 5 1.2 Scope of the study ..................................................................................... 7 1.3 Examining the impact of CAP subsidies on EU exports to developing countries through literature review ......................................................... 10 1.3.1 Do CAP domestic subsidies stimulate production? ............................ 11 1.3.2 Do CAP domestic subsidies permit dumping? ................................... 20 1.3.3 The magnitude of the
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized The greening of farm support programs: Public Disclosure Authorized international experiences with agricultural subsidy reform Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Emilie Cassou WORLD BANK | 2018 Contents Purpose ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Background and conceptual framework ....................................................................................................... 5 International experiences reforming and greening farm support programs ............................................... 9 Republic of Korea ...................................................................................................................................... 9 China ....................................................................................................................................................... 11 Vietnam ................................................................................................................................................... 13 European Union ...................................................................................................................................... 17 United States ........................................................................................................................................... 21 India .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • T Fly…' a Transdisciplinary Analysis of Neoliberal Agricultural Development
    International Journal of Transdisciplinary Research Vol. 6, No. 1, 2012 Hajdu, Jacobson, Salomonsson, Friman Pages 24-64 ‘BUT TRACTORS CAN’T FLY…’ A TRANSDISCIPLINARY ANALYSIS OF NEOLIBERAL AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTIONS IN SOUTH AFRICA Flora Hajdu*, (corresponding author) Address: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7012, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. Email: [email protected]. Phone number: +46 736735576 Klara Jacobson* Address: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7012, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. Email: [email protected]. Phone number: +46 18 671771 Lennart Salomonsson* Address: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7012, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. Email: [email protected]. Phone number: +46 18 671441 Eva Friman** Address: CSD Uppsala, Villavägen 16, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden. Email: [email protected]. Phone number: +46 701679174 *Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences **Centre for Environment and Development Studies, Uppsala Centre for Sustainable Development, Uppsala University ABSTRACT Agricultural interventions in South Africa have failed to deliver the promised poverty reduction for rural smallholders. Ecological economics, livelihoods studies, complex system methodology and discourse theory were used here to investigate the underlying reasons. The mismatch between local realities and programme management was found to be a central cause of failure. Lack of responsiveness to local realities within the programme resulted in tractors being sent to plough fields across a river with no bridge, leading locals to comment ‘but tractors can’t fly.’ The neoliberal discourse in South African development policy was found to be a crucial factor behind such omissions. Key words: neoliberalism, emergy, discourse, livelihood, South Africa 24 International Journal of Transdisciplinary Research Vol.
    [Show full text]