Wetland Habitat Goal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wetland Habitat Goal ANNUAL HABITAT WORK PLAN 2013 MONTEZUMA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SENECA FALLS, NEW YORK Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge had an exceptional preseason banding program breaking the refuge banding record for wood ducks with 408. Approved by: Refuge Manager Date 1 I. Introduction The Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) is located at the north end of Cayuga Lake in the heart of the Finger Lakes Region of central New York State. The refuge encompasses 9,809 acres and lies within New York’s 23rd and 24th U.S. Congressional Districts in Seneca, Cayuga, and Wayne Counties—35 miles west of Syracuse, 40 miles north of Ithaca, and 45 miles east of Rochester, NY. The refuge headquarters is located on US Route 20 and NY Route 5 near the Menard Memorial Bridge over the Seneca River. The New York State Barge Canal System, NY State Route 5, US Route 20, NY State Route 89, NY State Route 31 and the New York State Thruway pass through the interior of the refuge. Since the early 1990's, more than 3,100 acres of lands have been added to the refuge. Many of these parcels are scattered tracts within the original boundaries of the historic Montezuma marshes. Although established primarily for migratory waterfowl, Montezuma NWR provides habitats for a diversity of wildlife. The mix of wooded wetlands and uplands, emergent marshes, and mixed successional stages of vegetation all contribute to the species diversity of the wildlife community found at Montezuma. The Montezuma Wetlands Complex (MWC), of which the refuge is a part, was recognized for supporting one of the largest migratory concentrations of waterfowl in the Northeast and as a significant stopover site for migrating shorebirds in upstate New York. The MWC was New York’s flagship project in the Atlantic Coast Joint Venture after the adoption of the North American Waterfowl Management Plan. The National Audubon Society identified the MWC as New York’s first Important Bird Area (IBA). The refuge is managed for a variety of habitats to fulfill the needs of wildlife of greatest conservation concern. At present, Montezuma NWR has 15 manageable impoundments totaling more than 4,200 acres of freshwater wetland habitat. The remainder of the refuge’s acreage consists of forests, grasslands, and early successional habitats ranging from old fields to young forests. Active habitat management is necessary to provide the best possible habitat for native wildlife species. In most impoundments, water levels are manipulated to provide high quality mudflat, emergent marsh, and open water wetland habitats primarily for waterfowl, shorebirds, marshbirds, and bald eagles. Water levels are managed within and between years in an attempt to mimic natural wetland hydro-periods or to provide the best possible habitat for priority wildlife species. II. 2012 Weather Overview The 2011-2012 winter months were exceptionally warm and dry, with a snowfall deficit of >20”, compared to the 54 year average. Through the winter, Cayuga Lake’s water level was managed lower than average in attempts to control hydrilla, a highly invasive aquatic plant, found at the south end of the lake in August 2011. The low lake levels and lack of precipitation resulted in exposed mudflats at the north end of Cayuga Lake. These flats made available high quality food resources that harbored large amounts of wintering swans, geese, and ducks. Although large amounts of American black ducks were using Cayuga Lake through the winter, the exposed mudflats made it difficult to target the birds for the post-hunt season banding effort. Lack of winter precipitation had little effect on refuge pools and by late spring lake levels had risen to 2 allow management to raise the water level in the Main Pool by using the Cayuga Lake Connector Ditch. Warm, dry conditions continued through spring and summer. Fall conditions were near normal and brought much needed rain, although the refuge still had a rainfall deficit of >3” for the year, compared to the 54 year average (Table 1). Table 1. Weather recorded from the NOAA Online Weather Data in Auburn, NY (http://www.nws.noaa.gov/) approximately 10 miles East of MNWR. Averages are recorded in P:\LINDA\Annual_Habitat_Work_Plans\AVE_Weather.xls. 31-Yr 54-Yr 54-Yr 2012 Temperature Average Average Temperature (1981-2012) 2012 2012 Snowfall Precipitation Average Snowfall Precipitation Inches Inches Month High Low High Low Inches Inches (1959-2012) (1959-2012) January 36.1 20.0 31.5 15.8 20.1 4.8 18.7 1.5 February 39.5 24.5 33.7 16.1 12.0 1.0 15.0 1.3 March 56.3 34.3 43.7 24.2 5.8 2.6 9.9 2.4 April 53.8 32.5 56.6 35.2 3.6 2.5 2.4 3.0 May 74.0 50.2 69.1 45.4 0.0 3.0 0.1 3.1 June 77.8 56.1 76.9 55.2 0.0 2.2 0.0 3.3 July 85.2 61.2 81.2 60.2 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.3 August 81.7 58.6 79.5 58.8 0.0 3.8 0.0 3.4 September 73.3 50.7 72.4 51.4 0.0 3.8 0.0 3.5 October 60.4 43.5 59.1 40.5 0.0 4.8 0.1 3.2 November 45.3 30.2 48.5 32.0 2.3 2.4 4.2 3.2 December 40.0 27.7 36.2 21.9 30.6 7.5 15.8 2.2 Avg. Temp./Total Snowfall/Precip. 60.9 41.2 58.5 38.1 74.4 35.6 66.2 33.2 III. Habitat Management Goals, Objectives, and Strategies Monitoring Strategies for All Habitat Types In 2012, bats were monitored in all habitat types across the southern half of the refuge to determine the distribution of each bat species present. The refuge also is looking to confirm the presence of the federally endangered Indiana bat. This bat was detected within the Montezuma Wetlands Complex on Howland’s Island within the Northern Montezuma Wildlife Management Area and likely also occurs on the refuge. To conduct these surveys, active and passive sonar recording devices were deployed during maternity, volant, and migratory periods. Software to 3 analyze the data will be purchased in fiscal year 2013 and then bat species distributions will be determined. In 2012, the refuge began a pilot citizen science project to monitor the presence, phenology and distribution of anuran species across the refuge per the Frog Watch USA protocol (http://www.aza.org/frogwatch). In 2013, anuran call count surveys will be conducted twice a week at points spread across the refuge. Results from 2012 can be viewed in P:\FrogWatch\Results_FrogWatch_2012. Goal 1 Provide, enhance, and restore where possible, freshwater emergent marsh, open water wetland, and mudflat habitats to benefit native wildlife and plant communities, particularly migrating waterfowl, shorebirds, and breeding marshbird. Objective 1.1 Emergent (Hemi) Marsh – Migrating Waterfowl (Dabbling Ducks, especially Pintail and American Black Duck) Annually provide a minimum of 2,000 acres of spring (March through April) and fall (September through November) waterfowl migration and staging habitat consisting of shallow flooded wetlands (less than 12 inches deep) with a target of at least 25 percent cover of annual and 25 percent cover of perennial vegetation dominated by native species with high waterfowl food value. Objective 1.2 Emergent Marsh – Breeding Marshbirds Over the life of the plan, annually provide a minimum of 2,000 acres of habitat for breeding marshbirds consisting of 50 percent well-interspersed emergent vegetation and 50 percent open water, stable water levels throughout the breeding season, and abundant nest substrates. Objective 1.3 Shallow Water Mudflats – Migrating Shorebirds Provide a minimum of 100 acres of shallow water wetlands (less than 4 inches deep) and mudflats with sparse (less than 15 percent) vegetation from April through November to benefit migrating shorebirds. Goal 1 Strategies Actual water levels for 2012 are listed in Appendix A. Table 2 summarizes planned actions for 2013 in the refuge’s 15 emergent marsh impoundments to meet the three objectives listed above. A biological calendar was created to further detail management actions on the refuge (Appendix B). 4 Table 2. Summary of planned management in each impoundment for 2013 and the habitat objective each action is intended to meet. 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.2 Shallow Shallow Emergent Emergent Emergent Water Water Marsh – Marsh – Unit Acres Management Action Marsh – Mudflats – Mudflats – Spring Fall Breeding Spring Fall Migrating Migrating Marshbirds Migrating Migrating Waterfowl Waterfowl Shorebirds Shorebirds Main Pool 1,657 Spring slow drawdown. X X Tschache Pool 1,160 Full pool. X X X Sandhill Crane Unit 448 Full pool. X Knox Marsellus Summer slow Marsh 236 drawdown. Fall flood. X X X May’s Point Pool 199 Full pool. X X X Kipp Island South 126 Low pool. X X Puddler Summer slow Marsh 98 drawdown. Fall flood. X X X North Spring Pool 91 No Action X X Kipp Island North 89 Low pool. X X Millennium Marsh 69 Low pool. X X X Spring slow drawdown. Visitor Summer disk.*+ Center Shallow flood late Wetland 26 summer. X X X X Spring slow drawdown. Summer disk and grade.* + Shallow flood Eaton late summer depending Marsh 18 on road work. X X X X Spring slow drawdown. Summer disk. + Shallow flood late summer Benning depending on road Marsh 18 work. X X X X Box Elder Bog 10 Full pool. X X Spring slow drawdown.
Recommended publications
  • Summertime 2020 Hilary Lambert CLWN Steward Many People Have Been Noting That Nature’S Annual Seasonal Rounds Have Continued, Regardless of Our Human Problems
    CAYUGA LAKE WATERSHED 2020 i2 Network It takes a Network to protect a watershed. News Summertime 2020 Hilary Lambert CLWN Steward Many people have been noting that nature’s annual seasonal rounds have continued, regardless of our human problems. As our human cacophony has died down, some have wondered if nature is emerging, edging outward. Here’s my recent experience: When I went outside to walk my dog at 5:30 a.m., a deer was sleeping in the front yard on the recently-mown grass, halfway between my bedroom window and Hanshaw Road. She woke up, stared at us, and ambled slowly across the empty road to the fields. here’s a redwing blackbird just down next door pond wandered freely and the out-of-doors during these interesting, the road who daily divebombs talkatively around my yard, unafraid tragic, and strange times. Tme, my dog, and the neighbors, I of my household. I have heard of many Many people have gone to the lake to suppose for getting too close to the family other such close encounters, since shortly paddle, walk, and swim, are hiking along nest. It is probable that a bobcat visited after the pandemic began and people- creeks and to waterfalls for solace and the backyard in April (falling off a white pressure retreated. release. Families and friends sheltered pine branch with a yowl), terrifying my Is it us, or is it them? In any case, we at lakeside cottages outside the usual cats. The mallard ducks situated at the should treasure our deeper immersion in summer season, to be together and avoid pandemic dangers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulysses Ithaca Antiques Mall, 1607 Trumansburg Rd
    Touring the Towns of 1827, has been used as office, commercial, and residential space. Morning Glory, 89 Cayuga St, Trumansburg. 607-387-5305. Cemeteries C Tompkins County, New York At 1822 Trumansburg Rd is The Trees, a handsome early www.morningglory.com.laurie corner of Cemetery and Falls Sts, Trumansburg. See #7. Italianate house built in 1865 by James M. Mattison, owner of a Grove, popular nursery and tree farm on the site, which was started in Reunion House, 7550 Willow Creek Rd. 607-387-6553. Jones-Goodwin’s Point, Gorge Rd, west of Taughannock Farms 1845 and continued through the early 1870s. It is a private www.reunion-house.com Inn. residence today. Taughannock Farms Inn, Rt 89 at Taughannock Falls State Park. Quaker, see #9. 607-387-7711. www.t-farms.com. See #2. 9.9 Hector Monthly Meeting House, at 5066 Perry City Rd, St. James, Searsburg Rd, Trumansburg. 1 mile W of the Rt 96 intersection on the north side of the road, Westwind, 1662 Taughannock Blvd. 607-387-3377. this white clapboard building was erected c.1910, for the area’s www.fingerlakes.net/westwind Historical Markers Ħ Quaker community. There is also a cemetery. An old stone post Camp Site – Taughannock Falls State Park, north side. Site of at the driveway entrance has the carved letters HMMSOF, Antiques and Speciality Shops S 1788 exploring party’s camp. Hector Monthly Meeting, Society of Friends. Today the building Cold Springs Pottery Studio, 4088 Cold Springs Rd. Samuel Weyburn – Taughannock Falls State Park, south side. is used by the Ithaca Society of Friends for summer worship only.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Section
    APPENDIX 1. A Selection of Biodiversity Conservation Agencies & Programs A variety of state agencies and programs, in addition to the NY Natural Heritage Program, partner with OPRHP on biodiversity conservation and planning. This appendix also describes a variety of statewide and regional biodiversity conservation efforts that complement OPRHP’s work. NYS BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE The New York State Biodiversity Research Institute is a state-chartered organization based in the New York State Museum who promotes the understanding and conservation of New York’s biological diversity. They administer a broad range of research, education, and information transfer programs, and oversee a competitive grants program for projects that further biodiversity stewardship and research. In 1996, the Biodiversity Research Institute approved funding for the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to undertake an ambitious inventory of its lands for rare species, rare natural communities, and the state’s best examples of common communities. The majority of inventory in state parks occurred over a five-year period, beginning in 1998 and concluding in the spring of 2003. Funding was also approved for a sixth year, which included all newly acquired state parks and several state parks that required additional attention beyond the initial inventory. Telephone: (518) 486-4845 Website: www.nysm.nysed.gov/bri/ NYS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION The Department of Environmental Conservation’s (DEC) biodiversity conservation efforts are handled by a variety of offices with the department. Of particular note for this project are the NY Natural Heritage Program, Endangered Species Unit, and Nongame Unit (all of which are in the Division of Fish, Wildlife, & Marine Resources), and the Division of Lands & Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • GROWN HERE. MADE HERE. Vescelius New York Wine & Plants Frst N.Y
    grown here. made here. Seneca Lake Winery Association, Inc. Association, Seneca Lake Winery 320 Suite Street, Franklin 2 North 14891 York Glen, New Watkins (877) 536-2717 (607) 535-8080 or [email protected] senecalakewine.com Here’s to the farmers, Situated around the deep, blue waters of Seneca Lake, our unique, glacially-formed And their vision. landscape and sloping shorelines create an To the growers, ideal cool-climate growing region that allows And their bounty. our members to grow a number of delicate vinifera grapes like Riesling, Chardonnay, and To the makers. other aromatic whites. Red varieties such as To the artists. Cabernet Franc and Pinot Noir also thrive here, resulting in an array of diferent varieties and To their craft. styles, most made from grapes harvested within Here’s to the tasters, federally recognized Seneca Lake American Viticultural Area (AVA). We guarantee that you’ll And the diners. find a wine perfect for you! To the lovers, And friends. Our member wineries promote a spirit of cooperation to develop an outstanding and To the locals, comprehensive wine tourism region and are And the wanderers. dedicated to creating premium, award-winning wines suitable for every palate. Furthermore, To the Finger Lakes. Seneca Lake Wine Trail member wineries To this lake. are committed to enhancing the region’s economy and quality of life through a variety To these hills. of innovative and cooperative events and These waters. programs year-round. These vines. Since our organizations founding in 1986, These grapes. we have become a popular wine and grape Here’s to our passion.
    [Show full text]
  • Tales from the Littoral Zone the Origin of the Fish Species of Cayuga and Seneca Lakes Mel Russo Finger Lakes Area Naturalist and Life-Long Resident
    CAYUGA LAKE WATERSHED 2015 i2 Network It takes a Network to protect a watershed. News Tales from the Littoral Zone The Origin of the Fish Species of Cayuga and Seneca Lakes Mel Russo Finger Lakes area naturalist and life-long resident Our story begins at an unreasonable point in time, some 550 million years ago when what is now New York State was at the bottom of an epicontinental sea.Gradually, the As the most recent ice age ended, the Burbot (Lota lota) was an early arrival to Seneca and Cayuga lakes. Today this species is listed by NYS entire state, along with much of the northeast, fully DEC as “among the most unusual fish that anglers can encounter.” Please emerged from the sea by about 200 million years ago. see the end of this article for more information. or the next 100 million years or so, the somewhat level land would provide the first vehicle for the re-population of aquatic Fthat was Upstate New York, was then eroded by the flow of fauna into the Finger Lakes. many centuries of torrential precipitation. The wearing away As the front of the ice mass retreated, the young rivers of the land created twelve nearly parallel river valleys, which produced by the melt flowed southward to fill the valleys that included the mighty Seneca and Cayuga Rivers. The easternmost the glacier recently helped to shape. These numerous streams set of six flowed northward into a depression which was encountered other existing freshwater bodies, rivers and the precursor of the Great Lakes Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Cayuga Lake Basin New York State
    I GEOLOGY OF THE CAYUGA LAKE BASIN NEW YORK STATE GEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION 31 sT ANNUAL MEETING CORNELL UNIVERSITY, MAY 8-9» 1959 GEOLOGY OF THE CAYUGA LAKE BASIN A Guide for the )lst Annual Field Meeting of the New York State Geological Association prepared by Staff and Students of the Department of Geolqgy Cornell Universit,y ".080 We must especially collect and describe all the organic remains of our soil, if we ever want to speculate with the smallest degree of probabilit,r on the formation, respective age, and history of our earth .. " ------ C. S. Rafinesque, 1818 Second (Revised) Edition Ithaca, New York May, 1959 PREFACE Ten years have passed since Cornell was host to the New York state Geological Association. In the intervening yearllf we have attended the annual meetings and field trips at other places with pleasure and profit. Therefore, we take this opportunity to express our appreciation and thanks to all of those who have made theBe meetings possible. We not ~ welcome you to Cornell and the classic cayuga Lake Basin, but we sincerely hope you will en­ ja,y and profit by your brief excursions with us. This guide is a revision of one prepared for the 1949 annual meeting. Professor John W.. Wells assumed most of the responsi­ bility for its preparation, ably assisted by Lo R. Fernow, Fe M. Hueber and K.. No Sachs, Jro Without their efforts in converting ideas into diagrams and maps this guide book would have been sterile. we hope that before you leave us, you will agree with Louis Agassiz, who said in one of his lectures during the first year of Cornell, "I was never before in a single locality where there is presented so much ma.
    [Show full text]
  • Cayuga and Seneca Lakes NOAA Chart 14791
    BookletChart™ Cayuga and Seneca Lakes NOAA Chart 14791 A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters When possible, use the full-size NOAA chart for navigation. Included Area Published by the Point (42°39.4'N., 76°54.6'W.) on Seneca Lake. Three private special purpose lighted mooring buoys, painted red and white, mark a barge National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration moored about 1 mile northeast of Long Point. National Ocean Service Another facility of barge and buoys is 0.25 mile southwest of Portland Office of Coast Survey Point near the south end of Cayuga Lake. The barge and two mooring cables are each marked by a white buoy floodlighted at night. The barge www.NauticalCharts.NOAA.gov is marked by four vertical lights, one showing fixed white and three 888-990-NOAA showing fixed red. New York State Canal, Chart Coverage.–The NOS provides chart What are Nautical Charts? coverage of the New York State Canal System from the Hudson River at Troy, NY, as far west as Lyons, NY. Coverage of the canal system from Nautical charts are a fundamental tool of marine navigation. They show Syracuse west to the Niagara River at Tonawanda, NY, is contained in water depths, obstructions, buoys, other aids to navigation, and much New York State Canal System Cruising Guide, available at more. The information is shown in a way that promotes safe and http://www.canals.state.ny.us or telephone 800–422–1825. efficient navigation. Chart carriage is mandatory on the commercial Channels.–The Great Lakes-Hudson River Waterway Improvement ships that carry America’s commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Sites: an Introduction Matthew Horvath
    Dry Sites: An Introduction Matthew Horvath Dredge material can be used to physically create dry land for the city, especially along the edges of Cayuga Lake. This process is not a new one; in the past both Stewart Park and Cass Park were constructed using dredge material. First an edge of large stone is constructed in the water, which is then filled with dredge material. The edge acts as a barrier, reducing the risk of diffusion of dredged material back into the lake. Creating dry land has multiple beneficial effects for the city. First, it reduces the distance that the dredge material has to be freighted, thus reducing the carbon footprint. Additionally, creation of land on the lake has the ability to increase property values while creating additional property for the city. Cayuga Lake is used mostly by residents as a recreational destination, and the city profits from this use. This alternative would certainly strengthen the user interface with Cayuga Lake by giving residents further reason to visit this public commodity, benefitting both residents and the city alike. Alternatives & Reference Sites 51 Cornell Lake Source Cooling Project: Dryden, New York Becky Mikulay KEYNOTES: zero-order restoration for over a decade, our Inlet Application (1) Approximately 3,000 cubic yards of sediment. class surveyed the plant communities on two (2) After 12 years, similar vegetation is found in the sides of this field to compare the plant species Applying a layer of dredge sediment dredged sediment as on the adjacent old field soil. that had established in the old field soil as (3) Refer to Dredge Material Section for more to this previously disturbed agricultural site compared to those growing in the sediment.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Ups” and “Downs” of Cayuga Lake……
    The ‘Ups” and “Downs” of Cayuga Lake…… OR How I learned to stop worrying and love the changes in Cayuga Lake water levels. Contributors: Dr. Craig Williams New York State Museum Mike Riley Local Canal Historian Bill Hecht Local History/Photography Archivist Bill Kappel USGS Hydrogeologist 10. With Seneca Lake 1,564 and Keuka Lake 388.0 100-yr Flood level 386.0 Major Flood-damage level Minor Flood damage level 384.0 Maximum Target Lake-level Elevation 382.0 380.0 378.0 Olympus, where they say, the god’s eternal mansion stands unmoved, never rocked by galewinds, never drenched by rains, nor do the drifting snows assail it, no, the clean air stretches away without a cloud, and a great radiance plays across that world where the blithe gods live all their days in bliss. From: The Odyssey, Chapter IV, by Homer The Historical Perspective…. Baldwinsville Lyons Clyde Jordan Syracuse 1825 Map Montezuma Upstate New York The Historical Perspective…. Burr Atlas, 1839 No Bridge? No Problem………………….. The Historical Perspective…. Seneca County Map, 1850 The Historical Perspective…. 1860s Map – Seneca-Cayuga Canal at present day Mudlock 380.4 390.4 386.4 The Historical Perspective…. New York State Barge Canal Engineers Report 1862 Richmond Aqueduct – Past and Present 1850 Map with 2009 cultural features approximation of: Routes 5 &20 NYS- Thruway NYS – Barge Canal Footnotes on the water level of Cayuga Lake and the Seneca River from the records of the New York State Senate and Assembly New York State Senate – 1852 “Fall of the [Seneca] River from the Rochester-Syracuse railroad bridge to Baldwinsville [dam] is 12.54 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Cayuga Lake Angler Diary Cooperators
    April 5, 2021 To: Cayuga Lake Angler Diary Cooperators Dear Fellow Anglers, We have summarized the data from the 2020 diaries and are sending you the summary information, your 2020 diary and additional diaries for 2021 as needed. Thank you very much for your participation. Please check the Lake Trout and Rainbow Trout you catch for fin clips. All the Lake Trout and most of the Rainbow Trout stocked in Cayuga Lake have a fin clip. The fin clip data along with length and the other catch data we receive from our angler diary cooperators are instrumental in determining fish stocking policies and fishing regulations. We would like to increase the number of angler cooperators in our diary program. If you didn’t return your diaries this year, please do so next year. You may be removed from the mailing list if you do not participate. If you know anyone who might want to participate, please encourage them to join by calling (607) 753-3095 ext. 213 or emailing fwfish7@ dec.ny.gov. Open Water Trout and Salmon Fishing In 2020, 43 Cayuga Lake open water angler diary cooperators caught 2,245 legal salmonids in 955 trips (cooperators and party members combined) for an average catch of 2.4 fish per trip. Open water cooperators spent 4,227 hours fishing and had a legal salmonid catch rate of 1.9 hours per fish and were successful catching at least one legal salmonid in 87 percent of their trips. Many thanks to the additional cooperators who either joined or returned to the program in 2020! The graph below shows the catch rates (catch/trip) of legal salmonids by our Cayuga Lake open water cooperators from 1984 through 2020 and the relative contribution of each species in the total catch over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Owasco Lake Watershed
    Owasco Lake Watershed Institutional Framework and Assessment of Local Laws, Programs, and Practices Affecting Water Quality September 2015 This report was prepared with funds provided by the New York State Department of State under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. PROJECT MANAGER Cayuga County Department of Planning and Economic Development Cayuga County Office Building 160 Genesee Street, 5th Floor Auburn, New York 13021 (315) 253-1276 www.cayugacounty.us/Departments/Planning-and-Economic-Development PROJECT CONSULTANT EcoLogic, LLC 9 Albany Street, Suite 3J Cazenovia, New York 13035 (315) 655-8305 http://www.ecologicllc.com Funding provided by the New York State Department of State under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. Grant awarded to the Cayuga County Department of Planning and Economic Development Owasco Lake Watershed Institutional Framework and Assessment of Local Laws, Programs, and Practices Affecting Water Quality CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................1-1 CHAPTER 2. Institutional Framework: Roles and Responsibilities of Governmental and Nongovernmental Agencies ...........................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Federal Agencies and Watershed-Related Resources
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicides and Their Metabolites in Cayuga Lake and Its Tributaries, New York by David A.V
    Herbicides and their Metabolites in Cayuga Lake and its Tributaries, New York by David A.V. Eckhardt, William M. Kappel, William F. Coon, and Patrick J. Phillips ABSTRACT Analyses of stormflow samples collected from tributaries to Cayuga Lake in western New York shortly after application of atrazine and metolachlor to agricultural fields in June 1998 indicate that the highest concentrations, and the bulk of the loads of the two herbicides in the three tributaries was transported during peak flows. Concentrations of metolachlor metabolites remained high after the flow peaked as the soils drained. In contrast, deethylatrazine concentrations, which were generally low, increased only slightly during stormflow, apparently because the parent compound (atrazine) degrades at a much slower rate than metolachlor. Far more metolachlor-ESA (a degradation compound) was transported than any other pesticide or degradate; this indicates that it is relatively stable and mobile in the hydrologic environment. The ratios of a metabolite concentration to that of other metabolites and the parent compound in stream-water samples showed that base flow in the tributaries before the storm was enriched with metolachlor-ESA, but not with metolachlor or metolachlor-OA. After the storm, the ratio of metolachlor-OA to metolachlor increased markedly in the base flow; apparently metolachlor-OA that is formed in soils after pesticide application is readily leached but does not persist in ground water as much as metolachlor-ESA does. Water samples taken from Cayuga Lake in July, after the early-summer flush of pesticide residues in June, indicated fairly uniform concentrations of herbicides throughout the lake — from 0.2 to 0.6 µg/L for atrazine and from 0.05 to 0.3 µg/L for metolachlor.
    [Show full text]