GAE Committee Hearing Transcript for 02/27/2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 February 27, 2019 /ph GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION 11:00 A.M. AND ELECTIONS COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING CHAIRPERSON: Representative Daniel Fox SENATORS: Flexer, Haskell, Maroney, Sampson REPRESENTATIVES: Blumenthal, Fox, France, Haddad, Harding, Mastrofrancesco, McCarthy, Perillo, Phipps, Santiago, Winkler REP. FOX (148TH): Good morning and I welcome to today’s public hearing for the GA Committee. Representative Winkler has an announcement before we begin, Representative. REP. WINKLER (56TH): In the interest of safety, I would ask you to note the location of an access to exits in this hearing room, the two doors to which you entered the room are the emergency exits and are marked with exit signs. In an emergency, the door behind the legislators can also be used. In the event of an emergency, please walk quickly to the nearest exit. After exiting the room, proceed to the main stairs and follow the exit signs to one of the fire stairs. Please quickly exit the building and follow any instructions from the Capitol Police. Do not delay and do not return unless and until you are advised that it is safe to do so. In the event of a lockdown announcement, please remain in the hearing room, stay away from the exit doors and wait until an all clear announcement is heard. REP. FOX (148TH): Thank you, Representative Winkler. To begin, we typically reserve the first hour of testimony for public officials. So, we are 2 February 27, 2019 /ph GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION 11:00 A.M. AND ELECTIONS COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING going to maintain that procedure today, have the first hour, rotate back and forth between public officials and members of the public. So, first witness today is Secretary of State, Denise Merrill. Good morning, Secretary. Thank you for being here. DENISE MERRILL: Good morning, Chairman Fox, Vice Chairs Haskell and Winkler, nice to see you. Ranking members Sampson and France, oh he’s not here, just Senator Sampson. Members of the Committee thank you for being here. My name is Denise Merrill, I’m the Secretary of the State of Connecticut. I have submitted testimony on a number of bills before you today. So, I’m only going to speak about the proposal of mine, which is the only one on this agenda, which is House Bill 7213, AN ACT CONCERNING ELECTORAL PRIVILEGES OF CERTAIN PAROLEES AND CHALLENGERS IN THE POLLING PLACE, that would clarify voting rights in Connecticut by extending the franchise to people on parole and remove the antiquated challenger statute from Title 9. And I will leave it to you to read my testimony on the rest of the bills in the interest of time. I know there’s always lots of people that want to testify before you. Currently, Connecticut law allows people on probation to once again exercise their right to vote, but not people on parole. This bill would simply allow people on parole to also exercise their right to vote. We would join 16 states in the District of Columbia, including all our neighbors in New England by doing this. 3 February 27, 2019 /ph GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION 11:00 A.M. AND ELECTIONS COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING A real problem we often face when we try to get every eligible voter to register and every registered voter to vote is in getting people to know at what point in the process of leaving the criminal justice system to get their vote back. And I will tell you that is the biggest problem that we have is just convincing people that’s it’s okay, once again, to register and vote. This bill would remove some of that confusion over parole versus probation and simplify the restoration of voting rights to the physical release from prison. Reattaching voting rights to people as they leave their period of confinement doesn’t just alleviate confusion, it will also help people to reintegrate into the civic life of their community. Voters who exercise their right to vote sooner are more likely to become lifetime voters. If this legislation passes, my office will work with the judicial branch and the Department of Corrections on the complexities of the categories of parole to determine what constitutes parole as opposed to incarceration. So, House Bill 7213, also eliminates the anachronistic challenger designation, election day polling locations from Title 9. Although challengers do still exist in statute, they have not been used in many years. This designation is a vestige from a time when everyone in a town knew everyone else in a town and has no real use in our modern election structure. The challenger designation is not necessarily necessary because we have changed the law since that time to allow every person lawfully inside a polling place, including people who are not poll workers, but are unofficial 4 February 27, 2019 /ph GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION 11:00 A.M. AND ELECTIONS COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING checkers, appointed by registrars to communicate with local political parties. Anyone in the polling place can challenge someone who’s attempting to vote in that polling place, so long as the challenge is not made indiscriminately and the person issuing the challenge knows, suspects or reasonably believes that the challenge is valid. So, therefore, we propose that this challenger statute, which had the, basically a redundant position be eliminated and that’s why I support this bill. So, that’s it for my bill that you see before you. I’m happy to answer any questions. REP. FOX (148TH): Thank you very much, Madam Secretary, good seeing you again. Any questions for -- Senator Haskell. SENATOR HASKELL (26TH): Thank you, Madam Secretary for being here. Thank you for your testimony and for being a champion of voting rights in the State of Connecticut. I was hoping you could speak very briefly to the importance of voting in civic life and in the, in ability, in individual’s ability to feel a part of their community. You mentioned in your testimony that allowing individuals who are on parole to vote will help them reintegrate after their period of incarceration. Could you speak a little bit more to that and that fundamental role that voting does play in individuals’ social cohesion? DENISE MERRILL: Yes, that’s a, you’ve put your finger on it. I think the most important reason to have anyone who is in a community, back in the 5 February 27, 2019 /ph GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION 11:00 A.M. AND ELECTIONS COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING community, whether on parole, probation or anything else, be integrated back into that community. Voting behavior is very interesting because it does indicate that someone is aware of and treasures that right to participate in civic life. And I think anything we can do to encourage people to be involved and to, to be, feel, feel their part in civic life. And that’s the most difficult thing we find that after someone’s been incarcerated, they feel like they, they don’t belong anymore. And so I think in several ways, this session, I’ve proposed several bills that will do the same thing. I would point to the constitutional amendment I have introduced to allow 16-year-olds to preregister to vote is the same thing. I’m a former teacher and I remember that students, when they’re very young, if they’re part, if they feel they’re part of a system, they’re more likely to get information about it, to find out about candidates and to get interested in the whole electoral process. So, I think it’s the same theory and I think it’s a good one and we should be encouraging in anyway we can to let people reintegrate into civic life. SENATOR HASKELL (26TH): Well, thank you very much for your testimony. I, I do appreciate your input. And just to make sure I understand, we are an outlier in this regard, right? Our neighbors in New England do allow individuals who are on parole to vote? DENISE MERRILL: Yes, yes. The 16 states and DC allow it, many of them are in New England, so Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island, New Hampshire and 6 February 27, 2019 /ph GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION 11:00 A.M. AND ELECTIONS COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING Massachusetts, I believe, all allow parolees to vote. SENATOR HASKELL (26TH): Wonderful. Thank you very much. Thank you, Mr. Chair. REP. FOX (148TH): Thank you, Senator Haskell. Any further questions? Senator Sampson. SENATOR SAMPSON (16TH): Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Hello there, Madam Secretary. DENISE MERRILL: Good morning. SENATOR SAMPSON (16TH): Nice to see you. Just a question on your bill regarding the challengers. DENISE MERRILL: Yes. SENATOR SAMPSON (16TH): I honestly don’t know very much about this. I saw some news stories over this past election where the Stefanowski campaign was looking for challengers and I know that you kind of issued some sort of a rebuke to that. But outside of that, I don’t really know how often they are used. Could you speak to that? Is this a common practice or -- DENISE MERRILL: No. SENATOR SAMPSON (16TH): -- not? DENISE MERRILL: No, in fact, many, many years, that’s why we say it’s anachronistic. Really, we didn’t really remember any time that it’s been invoked before that time when the Stefanowski campaign brought it up. And that’s when we looked at it again and said, well, anyone in the polling place can already do this. So, that’s why we thought it was a redundant kind of statute. 7 February 27, 2019 /ph GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION 11:00 A.M.