DOCSLIB.ORG

(CIL) Community Infrastructure Levy Regulat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(CIL) Community Infrastructure Levy Regulat NOTICE OF ADOPTION South Downs National Park Authority Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 (as amended) Approval and Publication of a Charging Schedule (Regulation 25) This statement is published in line with S.213 of the Planning Act (2008) and Regulation 25 of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations (2010), as amended. South Downs National Park Authority hereby gives notice that our Charging Schedule has been approved on 31 January 2017, and will come into force on 01 April 2017. The Charging Schedule shall remain in effect unless further notice is issued in line with Regulation 28. The Community Infrastructure Levy is a new charge that South Downs National Park Authority will be able to collect on new developments in their area. It is based on a formula relating to the type and size of development and is collected when planning permissions for new developments are granted. The funds will contribute to the cost of infrastructure within South Downs National Park. The CIL Charging Schedule was the subject of an independent examination on 15 June 2016 by Nigel Payne BSC (HONS) DIPTP MRTPI MCMI, appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government. Copies of the CIL Charging Schedule and the Inspector’s Report can be viewed:- • On the SDNPA website: https://www.southdowns.gov.uk/planning/planning-policy/community- infrastructure-levy/ • At the following South Downs National Park Authority Offices: South Downs Centre North Street Midhurst West Sussex GU299DH Western Downs Area Office Empshott Grange Church Lane Empshott Liss Hampshire GU336HT Central Downs Area Office Weald and Downland Museum Singleton West Sussex PO180EU Eastern Downs Area Office Stanmer Park Lewes Road Brighton BN19SE • At the following Local Planning Authorities: Chichester District Council East Pallant House 1 East Pallant Chichester PO19 1TY Mid Sussex District Council Oaklands Road Haywards Heath West Sussex RH16 1SS Winchester City Council Colebrook Street Winchester SO23 9LJ East Hampshire District Council Penns Place Petersfield Hampshire GU31 4EX Wealden District Council Council Offices Vicarage Lane Hailsham BN27 2AX Horsham District Council Parkside Chart Way Horsham West Sussex RH12 1RL Lewes District Council Southover House Southover Road Lewes East Sussex BN7 1AB Eastleigh Borough Council Civic Offices Leigh Road Eastleigh SO50 9YN Havant Borough Council Public Service Plaza Civic Centre Road Havant PO9 2AX Arun District Council Arun Civic Centre Maltravers Road Littlehampton BN17 5LF Adur & Worthing Councils Portland House 44 Richmond Road Worthing West Sussex BN11 1HS Eastbourne Borough Council 1 Grove Road Eastbourne East Sussex BN21 4TW Brighton & Hove City Council King’s House Grand Avenue Hove BN3 2LS East Sussex County Council County Hall St Anne's Crescent Lewes East Sussex BN7 1UE West Sussex County Council County Hall West Sussex Chichester PO19 1RH Hampshire County Council The Castle Winchester Hampshire SO23 8UJ Waverley District Council The Burys Godalming Surrey GU7 1HR South Downs Centre, North Street, Midhurst, West Sussex, GU29 9DH T: 01730 814810 E: [email protected] www.southdowns.gov.uk Chief Executive: Trevor Beattie .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MID SUSSEX DISTRICT COUNCIL Planning Committee 8 APR 2021
    MID SUSSEX DISTRICT COUNCIL Planning Committee 8 APR 2021 RECOMMENDED FOR PERMISSION Worth DM/20/4654 © Crown Copyright and database rights 2021 Ordnance Survey 100021794 TWOWAYS STATION ROAD CRAWLEY DOWN CRAWLEY DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING DETACHED BUNGALOW AND THE ERECTION OF 3NO. FOUR BEDROOM DETACHED HOUSES WITH ASSOCIATE GARAGES JAMIE COPLAND POLICY: Ashdown Forest SPA/SAC / Built Up Areas / Classified Roads - 20m buffer / Aerodrome Safeguarding (CAA) / ODPM CODE: Minor Dwellings 8 WEEK DATE: 12th April 2021 WARD MEMBERS: Cllr Phillip Coote / Cllr Ian Gibson / Cllr Roger Webb / CASE OFFICER: Joseph Swift PURPOSE OF REPORT To consider the recommendation of the Divisional Leader, Planning and Economy on the application for planning permission as detailed above. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This application seeks planning permission for the demolition of the existing detached bungalow and erection of 3no. four bedroom detached houses with associated garages at Twoways, Station Road, Crawley Down which is designated within the Mid Sussex District Plan as being within the built up area boundaries. The application has been called in by Cllr Coote, Cllr Gibson and Cllr Webb on the grounds of overdevelopment and not in-keeping within the street scene. Planning legislation requires the application to be determined in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. It is therefore necessary for the planning application to be assessed against the policies in the development plan and then to take account of other material planning considerations including the NPPF. National planning policy states that planning should be genuinely plan led. The Council has a recently adopted District Plan and is able to demonstrate that it has a five year housing land supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Summary
    CLIMATE EMERGENCY PROGRESS CHECKLIST - 10 December 2019 NB. This is work in progress! We have almost certainly missed some actions. Please contact [email protected] with any news or updates. County/Authority Council Status County/Authority Council Status Brighton & Hove BRIGHTON & HOVE CITY COUNCIL DECLARED Dec 2018 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed May 2019 WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed - April 2019 Ashford Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 Adur Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Canterbury City Council DECLARED July 2019 Arun District Council DECLARED Nov 2019 Dartford Borough Council DECLARED Oct 2019 Chichester City Council DECLARED June 2019 Dover District Council Campaign in progress West Sussex Chichester District Council DECLARED July 2019 Folkestone and Hythe District Council DECLARED July 2019 Crawley Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Gravesham Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Kent Horsham District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Maidstone Borough Council DECLARED April 2019 Mid Sussex District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Medway Council DECLARED April 2019 Worthing Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Sevenoaks District Council Motion Passed - Nov 2019 EAST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL DECLARED Oct 2019 Swale Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Eastbourne Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Thanet District Council DECLARED July 2019 Hastings Borough Council DECLARED Dec 2018 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 East Sussex Lewes District Council DECLARED July 2019 Tunbridge
    [Show full text]
  • Empshott Lodge Empshott, Liss, Hampshire
    Empshott Lodge Empshott, Liss, Hampshire A substantial Victorian family house set in lovely mature gardens with long distance views Features • Porch Outside • Entrance hall • Loggia • Library • Log store • Family room • Mature landscaped gardens • Drawing room • Paddock of approximately 4.2 (1.70 ha) • Kitchen/dining room • In all about 6.43 acres (2.60 ha) • Cloakroom • Utility room • Pantry • Larder • Cellars • Studio/office • Conservatory • Car port • Garage • External storage First Floor • Master bedroom suite with bathroom, shower room & dressing room • 2 further double bedrooms • Family bathroom Second Floor • Double bedroom (4) with shower room en suite • 3 further double bedrooms • Single bedroom (8) • Bathroom • Box room The Property Empshott Lodge, which is not Listed, was believed to have been built in 1860 on the site of Chases Farm. It was built for Colonel Butler to a design by the Winchester Cathedral Architect, John Colson, who designed a number of churches and vicarages. It is built in the Elizabethan style, over three floors with Selborne Stone and red brick dressings under tiled roofs. Particularly notable are the original doors, staircase and joinery and the Elizabethan style chimneys which have just been repaired. The property oozes charm and character and the well proportioned rooms provide spacious, flexible accommodation. Gardens and Grounds Empshott Lodge is approached over a long gravelled drive to a large parking area at the front of the house. The formal gardens have wonderful mature trees, among them a Wellingtonia, a Cut Leaved Beech, Scots Pine and a rare Spanish Chestnut. There are also shrubs, flower borders and beech hedging.
    [Show full text]
  • Selsey NP Decision Statement July 2020
    F11f Chichester District Council Chichester District Council Local Planning Authority Selsey Neighbourhood Plan 2014 - 2029 DECISION STATEMENT 1. Introduction 1.1 Under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended), the Council has a statutory duty to assist communities in the preparation of Neighbourhood Plans and Orders and to take plans through a process of examination, referendum and adoption. The Localism Act 2011 (Part 6 Chapter 3) sets out the local planning authority’s responsibilities for Neighbourhood Planning. 1.2 This report confirms that the modifications proposed in the examiner’s report have been accepted, the draft Selsey Neighbourhood Plan has been altered as a result of it and that this plan may now proceed to referendum. 2. Background 2.1 The Selsey Neighbourhood Development Plan relates to the area that was designated by Chichester District Council as a neighbourhood area on 4 December 2012. This area is coterminous with the Selsey Town Council boundary that lies within the Chichester District Council local planning authority area. 2.2 Following the submission of the Selsey Neighbourhood Plan to the Council, the plan was publicised and representations were invited. The publicity period ended on 23 March 2018. 2.3 Mr John Slater was appointed by Chichester District Council, with the consent of Selsey Town Council, to undertake the examination of the Selsey Neighbourhood Development Plan and to prepare a report of the independent examination. 2.4 The examiner’s report concludes that, subject to making modifications recommended by the examiner, the Plan meets the basic conditions set out in the legislation and should proceed to a Neighbourhood Plan referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • Chichester District Council V Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Anor [2019] EWCA Civ 1640 (09 October 2019)
    Case Name: Chichester District Council v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities And Local Government & Anor [2019] EWCA Civ 1640 (09 October 2019) Full case: Click Here Commentary: The Court of Appeal found that an Inspector had not erred in law in his application of paragraph 198 NPFF which states that where a planning application conflicts with a neighbourhood plan it should normally not be granted. The decision of the lower Court was upheld. The Appeal was made by Chichester District Council against the judgment of Upper Tribunal Judge Grubb, sitting as a Deputy Judge in the High Court, who held that a Planning Inspector had not erred in his application of paragraph 198 NPPF in permitting an appeal against the refusal by the Appellant of a planning permission for 34 homes outside of the boundary of the village of Southborne. The Inspector found that the planning application was in conflict with two policies of the Chichester Local Plan and that it would not accord with the aims of the relevant Neighbourhood Plan. However, the development proposals would not conflict with the policies of that neighbourhood plan. As the Appellant could not demonstrate a five-year housing supply the Inspector applied the presumption in favour of sustainable development in paragraph 14 NPPF and allowed the appeal. This decision was upheld by the High Court. The Court of Appeal held that the concept set out in paragraph 198 NPPF is straightforward and does not elevate the status of the neighbourhood plan within the development plan as a whole, nor does it alter the presumption that planning decisions must be made in accordance with a development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Midhurst Sense of Place
    Midhurst Sense of Place Produced as part of the Midhurst Vision by the Sense of Place Working Group September 2009 Cover image courtesy of Michael Chevis www.michaelchevis.com Contents 5 Foreword 6 Introduction 9 Context 12 Sense of Place Aims 13 Sense of Place Process 15 Activity 17 Physical Setting 20 Meaning 23 Sense of Place Definition 26 Place Making 31 Place Reading 36 Place Marketing 38 Potential Actions and Projects 39 Next Steps 40 Summary 42 Acknowledgements 43 Appendix 44 Key Design Principles 50 Terms of Reference 5 Foreword Like may towns throughout the UK, Midhurst has a range of unique qualities. Yet as a result of social and economic change it faces competition from neighbouring destinations like Chichester, Petersfield, Haselmere and Guildford. Chichester District Council recognised this problem and through a series of projects (aimed at supporting the local economy), engaged with the community to help identify key areas of development and regeneration. Whilst residents may have strong emotional links to their town or village, it is becoming increasingly important to understand and reveal the innate qualities and character of a place to attract visitors and compete with other towns in their region. However, it may be difficult to express what defines a ‘place’, but it is important to do so, to ensure that any support given by way of physical improvement or economic development, is appropriate and does not lead to the loss of individuality and regional identity. Understanding that Midhurst’s future prosperity is dependent on finding a way to manage change whilst maintaining a genuine and authentic sense of place, it became clear that a process was required to capture and articulate these unique aspects to help develop plans for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Census Joint Committee (Central Sussex Partnership)
    CenSus Joint Committee (Central Sussex Partnership) Minutes of a meeting held in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre, Shoreham-by-Sea at 10.00am on Friday 19 June 2015 Present: Councillors: Neil Parkin (Chairman), Adur District Council Jim Funnell, Adur District Council Brian Donnelly, Horsham District Council Gary Marsh, Mid Sussex District Council Apologies: Councillors: Daniel Humphreys, Worthing Borough Council Mark Nolan, Worthing Borough Council Gordon Lindsay, Horsham District Council Jonathan Ash-Edwards, Mid Sussex District Council Also Present: Jane Eckford, Director for Customer Services, Adur and Worthing Councils Paul Brewer, Director for Digital & Resources, Adur and Worthing Councils Paul Tonking, Head of Revenues & Benefits, Adur and Worthing Councils Dave Briggs, Head of Design & Digital, Adur and Worthing Councils Neil Terry, Senior Democratic Services Officer, Adur and Worthing Councils Andrew Mathias, Senior Solicitor, Adur and Worthing Councils Katharine Eberhart, Director of Corporate Resources, Horsham District Council Tim Delany, Head of CenSus Revenues and Benefits, Mid Sussex District Council Peter Stuart, Head of Finance: CenSus CFO, Mid Sussex District Council John Ross, Head of CenSus ICT, Horsham District Council CJC/001/15-16 Declarations of Interest None. CJC/002/15-16 Minutes Resolved that the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 27 March 2015 be agreed and signed by the Chairman CJC/003/15-16 Urgent Items None. CJC/004/15-16 CenSus Annual Return 2014/15 The Committee received a report from the Head of Finance: CenSus CFO, setting out the CenSus Annual Return accounting statement for the partnership to be audited by PKF Littlejohn. The Committee was advised that the return fulfilled statutory requirements to report on the financial standing of the entity.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Variation On-Street Parking Charges 2021 Chichester District
    WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL NOTICE OF VARIATION: ON-STREET PARKING CHARGES 2021 CHICHESTER DISTRICT NOTICE is hereby given that West Sussex County Council in exercise of its powers under Section 46A Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and Regulation 25 of the Local Authorities Traffic Order (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996 proposes to vary the Charges and Tariffs detailed in the Second Schedule of the West Sussex County Council (Chichester District) (Parking Places and Traffic Regulation) (Consolidation) Order 2010. The charges below will be changed as shown below from 4 January 2021: Parking Permits in CPZ Zones: Old Charge New Charge Chichester CPZ Centre Zone 1st Resident Annual Permit £164.00 £168.00 Subsequent Resident Annual £205.00 £210.00 Permit 1st Resident 6-month permit £87.00 £90.00 Subsequent Resident 6-month £109.00 £112.00 Permit Non-Resident Annual Permit £275.00 £282.00 Non-Resident 6-month Permit £145.00 £149.00 Chichester All Day Zone 1st Resident Annual Permit £44.00 £46.00 Subsequent Resident Annual £88.00 £92.00 Permit 1st Resident 6-month Permit £24.00 £25.00 Subsequent Resident 6-month £48.00 £50.00 Permit Non-Resident Annual Permit £275.00 £282.00 Non-Resident 6-month Permit £145.00 £149.00 Chichester Part Day Zone 1st Resident Annual Permit £38.00 £39.00 Subsequent Resident Annual £76.00 £78.00 Permit 1st Resident 6-month permit £20.00 £21.00 Subsequent Resident 6-month £40.00 £42.00 Permit Non-Resident Annual Permit £165.00 £169.00 Non-Resident 6-month Permit £87.00 £90.00 All Chichester CPZ Zones
    [Show full text]
  • The Mediaeval Paving Tiles of the Alton Area of N. E. Hampshire
    PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS 289 THE MEDIAEVAL PAVING TILES OF THE ALTON AREA OF N.E. HAMPSHIRE. By THE REV. G. E. C. KNAPP. HE interest of the writer in the study of Mediaeval Paving Tiles was aroused by the paper on the Tiles of Titchfield TAbbey in the Proceedings of the Hampshire Archaeological Society, Vol. XVII, Part I, and by Dr. and Mrs. A. R. Green, without whose help and encouragement the writer would not have embarked on the task of recording the tiles found in this part of the County, and to whom any value which the paper may have is due. The writer found ready assistance in this local research in a group of young people in whom, as part of their preparation for Confirmation, he was trying to arouse an interest in the inheritance which is ours in our ancient churches. The writer would record his appreciation of the help of the Misses Diana and Jennifer French, who traced many of the tiles and prepared the drawings for the illustration of this paper. Starting with our own church at Hartley Mauditt, the tiles there were recorded, and then, going further afield, Selborne was the objective. But the interest and enthusiasm of the young tile hunters was heightened by the discovery of further tiles in the churches of Faringdon and Binsted, which, Dr. Green assured us, had not been recorded in any of the books or reports on the Church treasures of Hampshire. The following churches in the Alton area have been inspected, those containing mediaeval tiles being shown in block letters : New Alresford, Old Alresford, ALTON ST.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gatwick Diamond Initiative
    The Gatwick Diamond Initiative Management Group Terms of Reference The Management Group are responsible for the management of the GDI’s business and affairs, for which purpose they may exercise all the powers of the Gatwick Diamond Initiative. Refer to the Articles of Association for the full powers and responsibilities of the Management Group. The role of the Management Group is: • Operational management and coordination of the implementation of the Gatwick Diamond Future Plan and subsequent business plans • Financial and performance management of the Gatwick Diamond Initiative as a whole and of each of the Thematic Working Groups • Coordination and identification of potential Gatwick Diamond funding sources and delegation of funding applications to appropriate parties, including the Working Groups or Gatwick Diamond Executive Director • Strategic engagement with Gatwick Airport The Management Group meets at least every quarter. Members The Management Group is also the Board of Directors and is made of up Non Executive Directors. Board Directors Chair of the Management Board David Butcher MD FD Outsourcing Ltd Business Member Paul Gresham Business Member Divorce Accounting Ltd Karim Mohamed Business Member Mayo Wynne Baxter John Donaldson Business Member Arora Hotels Mark Pearson Business Member Surrey Connects Lee Harris Local Authority Member Crawley Borough Council Tom Crowley Local Authority Member Horsham District Council Kathryn Hall Local Authority Member Mid Sussex District Council Frances Rutter Local Authority Member Epsom
    [Show full text]
  • 73341 Adur Worthing.Indd
    Case Study Adur & Worthing Councils IT Services Ricoh IT Service transforms local authority ability to deliver shared services and improve best value Adur & Worthing Councils typify local government efforts solution developed by Ricoh - in three months instead of six to combine resources and provide shared services and best - has reduced costs and is expected to pay for itself in two value to the communities they serve. The Councils have years; and has made it easier, quicker and more environmen- used a Ricoh IT Service to transform the way they provide tally friendly to deploy shared ICT services. ICT services. The virtual desktop environment infrastructure Executive summary Name: Adur & Worthing Councils Benefits Location: Shoreham-by-Sea and Worthing, • Achieves significant cost savings which underpin an West Sussex ‘invest to save’ funding strategy Size: 1,300 staff • Return on investment expected in two years Activity: Local government • Helps Councils achieve best value service delivery Challenges • Makes it easier and quicker to deploy shared ICT services • Improve the ability to deliver best value to the community • Delivered a fully-operational, enterprise-wide, six-month • Support a significant change in Council staff working project in just three months practice • Reduces carbon emissions and improves environmental • Enable ICT to support delivery of Council services more credentials efficiently Solution • Ricoh IT Service Case Study Adur & Worthing Councils Challenges tions. Some HR staff were fixed workers with their own desks and desktop PCs, while others worked from hot desks Adur & Worthing Councils in West Sussex are two separate or from home using laptops (flexible). local authorities that have come together to deliver best val- ue to their communities by sharing services.
    [Show full text]
  • Other Material
    188 HAMPSHIRE FIELD CLUB BOTANICAL EXCURSION TO NOAR HILL N Wednesday, July 4th, a very successful excursion to Noar Hill in search of Orchids took place. This spot is very O little known ; it lies between Newton Valence and Empshott at an elevation of 696 feet, with beautiful views of all the country round. Old chalk diggings, overgrown with turf, form the happy hunting-ground for a large number of wild flowers.' A short local history thus speaks of it : " There was a hamlet or manor of Cures (a clerical error for Oures) lying within the Hundred of Selborne held by the wealthy Benedictine Abbey of Hyde at Winchester. In 1275, and again in 1334, it figures in the Hundred Rolls as the Manor of Ores held of the King ' in chief' by the Abbey ' in perpetual alms ' ; the little Manor remained in the possession of the Abbey till the Dissolution." Gilbert White writes of " Nore Hill, a noble chalk promontory, remarkable for sending forth two streams into two different seas. The one to the south becomes a branch of the Arun, and so falling into the British Channel ; the other to the north, the Selborne stream, makes one branch of the Wey and passes .... thus at the Nore into the German Ocean." According to the local history, " in old days the Lord of the Manor alone might dig chalk from the waste, and seems to have taken full advantage of his privilege if we may judge from the pock-marks on Noar Hill. Anyone else who had a fancy to do the same was liable to a fine of £20 per load." About 50 botanically inclined members turned up, the weather was all that could be desired, orchids were there in plenty, in fact, in places we walked over masses of the Musk Orchis.
    [Show full text]