DOCSLIB.ORG

Big Government? Public Manager of the Week

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PAD 6060 week two lecture University of North Florida Master of Public Administration program PAD 6060 Public administration in modern society Fall 2017 Big government? Public manager of the week Photo credit Margaret Thatcher Former Prime Minister, and small government advocate Lecture goals: Introduce some perspectives on public management. * In this lecture we'll look at some historical context of American public administration, then look at some conceptual perspectives. But we’ll start with some (necessarily crude) definitional differences between public administration/ management/ policy/ affairs: Political science/politics (as in a Major in Political Science): a focus on human governance from the perspective of political leaders, and their elections. Public affairs (as in School of Public and Environmental Affairs): a broad focus on the formal organizations, and processes of human governance. This is an umbrella term, including the following: o Public policy (as in the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management): a focus on the processes of (or interactions involved in) human governance. Public policy also tends to focus on analytical techniques for solving policy problems. For a discussion of the difference between the MPA and MPP (Master of Public Policy), from the accrediting agency for both, click link. o Public administration (as in the American Society for Public Administration): a focus on the structures of (or organizations involved in) human governance. The focus is especially on managing (‘administering’) government organizations. Public management (as in the Public Management Research Association): much the same as public administration (focus on structures), save that it purports to take a more pragmatic, how-to-manage-an-organization approach. This public management v. administration distinction is largely an academic one, though. o Nonprofit administration (as in the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organization and Voluntary Action): a focus on the structures and process of non-governmental, non-business organizations. Business management (as in a College of Business): a focus on the management of for-profit business firms, and the processes of market allocation. Page 1 of 12 PAD 6060 week two lecture Clear enough? If so, please explain it to me! It is also worth bearing in mind that the conceptual boundaries between these fields break down in their application, as there is a lot of crossing over. Among other things, I don't think it is possible to understand the structures of public administration without some knowledge of the public policy processes that public agencies are often involved in. Politicians who get elected but have no implementable policies are a disaster; and public managers who are unaware of politics are likely to have a short career. Big guv’mint! (Or is it?) Table 1 Some pragmatic, good government indicators Corruption Civil Government Legal It is worth keeping in mind that the US federal government is, perceptions freedom effectiveness system in dollar terms, the world's G7+ US 7.1 1 7.86 7.50 largest. Why? Liechtenstein is Australia 8.7 1 8.93 8.31 able to govern itself with a Canada 8.9 1 9.29 8.28 government that costs about France 6.8 1 7.14 7.31 US$1b, while the US federal Germany 7.9 1 7.86 8.17 government alone spent some Italy 3.9 1.5 6.79 5.67 $3,455b (in 2013, source). If Japan 7.8 1.5 8.21 7.49 Liechtenstein can govern itself Sweden 9.2 1 9.64 8.48 for only $1b, why does it cost UK 7.6 1 7.86 8.11 us $3.5t? But of course, the US is much, much larger than BRICs Liechtenstein, hence the much Brazil 3.7 2 7.50 5.25 larger budget of the US. Turns China 3.5 6.5 5.00 6.38 India 3.3 2.5 8.57 5.93 out, as seen in Table 1 in Russia 2.1 5.5 3.21 5.73 Lecture 1, the US actually is a relatively lightly governed Laggards country, both in terms of the Pakistan 2.3 4.5 5.71 4.04 size, and regulatory reach of its Nigeria 2.4 4.0 3.21 4.20 governments. This is also Vietnam 2.7 6.0 4.29 6.01 evident in the comparison with Venezuela 2.0 5.0 3.93 2.91 Liechtenstein: even though the Sources: Corruption perceptions is from Transparency International. It is US federal budget is about a 1-10 scale, with 10 = less corrupt. Civil freedom is from Freedom House. It is a 1-7 scale, with 1 = free, 7 = not free. Government 3500 times larger than that of effectiveness and the legal system are from the Economist Intelligence Liechtenstein, the population of Unit’s Democracy Index. the US is nearly 9000 times larger (and land area over 50,000 times larger). So we do more with relatively less, providing government for 9000 times as many people, for only 3500 times more money. Say what you will about government in the US: it is more efficient than that of Liechtenstein. You won’t hear that on Fox News (link for example). Despite 'big bureaucracy', 'constraint' -- attempts at reducing the size and role of government -- has been a fundamental feature of the US system since the country was founded. Indeed, the country was founded with a ‘separation of powers’ to restrict capricious government activity: The Executive (identified in Article II of the Constitution) The Legislature, (identified in Article I of the Constitution) itself split into Page 2 of 12 PAD 6060 week two lecture o The House of Representatives, and o The Senate Judiciary (Article III of the Constitution) State governments (which preceded the United States, and guaranteed their rights through the 10th Amendment), themselves featuring An executive; A Legislature, 49 of which have both a House, and a Senate; and a Judiciary Still, despite this small American government with a light regulatory footprint, extraordinary enjoyment of civil and political liberties (as indicated in Table 1 from the previous page), there is little doubt but that government in the US has grown over the past century. This process has waxed and waned, though, as reflected in Table 2, below. Table 2 Federal spending (size of government!) in the US over time Year Federal Federal Federal GDP Jobless Highest (Presidential Outlays revenue Balance change (%) marginal budgets) (%GDP) (% GDP) (%GDP) (% annual) tax rate 1920 --- --- --- --- 73.0 1930 3.4 4.1 +0.7 -8.6 --- 25.0 1932 6.8 2.8 -4.0 -13.0 --- 63.0 1933 7.9 3.4 -4.5 -1.3 --- 63.0 1935-7 9.3 5.4 -4.0 9.0 --- 73.0 1938 7.6 7.5 -0.1 -3.4 --- 79.0 1939 10.1 7.0 -3.1 8.1 --- 79.0 1943 42.6 13.0 -29.6 16.4 --- 88.0 1944 42.7 20.5 -22.2 8.1 --- 94.0 1945 41.0 19.1 -21.9 -1.1 --- 94.0 1946 24.2 17.1 -7.1 -11.0 --- 86.45 1947-1960 16.3 16.5 0.2 3.4 4.6 89.1 1961-1974 18.9 18.2 -0.7 4.0 4.9 76.0 1975-1981 20.5 17.8 -2.7 3.0 7.1 69.9 1982-1989 (Reagan) 21.6 17.5 -4.1 3.6 7.3 43.1 1990-1993 (Bush I) 21.3 17.2 -4.1 1.9 6.7 32.4 1994-2001 (Clinton) 18.6 18.8 +0.2 3.5 4.9 39.5 2002-2009 (Bush II) 19.9 16.5 -3.4 1.6 5.8 35.5 2009 24.4 14.6 -9.8 -2.8 9.3 35.0 2010 23.4 14.6 -8.7 2.5 9.6 35.0 2011 23.4 15.0 -8.5 1.6 8.9 35.0 2012 22.1 15.3 -6.8 2.2 8.1 35.0 2013 20.9 16.8 -4.1 1.7 7.4 39.6 2014 20.4 17.5 -2.8 2.6 6.2 39.6 2015 20.6 18.2 -2.4 2.9 5.3 39.6 2016 20.9 17.8 -3.2 1.5 4.9 39.6 Sources: Budget data: Office of Management and Budget, Summary of Receipts, Outlays, and Surpluses or Deficits (-) as Percentages of GDP: 1930-2020. GDP change: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Gross Domestic Product change from previous period. Jobless: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population, 1940 to date. Tax: Tax Policy Center, Historical Individual Income Tax Parameters. Page 3 of 12 PAD 6060 week two lecture From the data, three spurts of federal government growth are evident: the 1930s through World War II, the ‘Great Society’ era, then again from the late 70s through the Reagan years. The recent recession then lifted federal spending above even the Reagan years, though with recovery federal spending has decreased back to below Reagan-era levels. Why this previous growth occurred is due to numerous reasons, but in large part was due to growth and modernization of US society. Richer countries have larger governments (even as a share of their economy), as more complex societies require more coordination, and as richer people demand low crime, good schools, good infrastructure, good health (low incidence of tuberculosis and West Nile virus, etc.), a cleaner environment (mowed street medians, rivers that don’t turn green, etc.), and the like. Other interesting points from Table 2: Tax rates dropped through the 1920s, yet economic calamity occurred! Note the intensity of the Great Depression.
Recommended publications
  • A POLITICAL THEORY of POPULISM* Daron Acemoglu Georgy Egorov Konstantin Sonin I. Introduction There Has Recently Been a Resurgen

    A POLITICAL THEORY of POPULISM* Daron Acemoglu Georgy Egorov Konstantin Sonin I. Introduction There Has Recently Been a Resurgen

    A POLITICAL THEORY OF POPULISM* Daron Acemoglu Georgy Egorov Konstantin Sonin When voters fear that politicians may be influenced or corrupted by the rich elite, signals of integrity are valuable. As a consequence, an honest polit- ician seeking reelection chooses ‘‘populist’’ policies—that is, policies to the left of the median voter—as a way of signaling that he is not beholden to the interests of the right. Politicians that are influenced by right-wing special interests re- Downloaded from spond by choosing moderate or even left-of-center policies. This populist bias of policy is greater when the value of remaining in office is higher for the polit- ician; when there is greater polarization between the policy preferences of the median voter and right-wing special interests; when politicians are perceived as more likely to be corrupt; when there is an intermediate amount of noise in the information that voters receive; when politicians are more forward-looking; and http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/ when there is greater uncertainty about the type of the incumbent. We also show that soft term limits may exacerbate, rather than reduce, the populist bias of policies. JEL Codes: D71, D74. I. Introduction There has recently been a resurgence of ‘‘populist’’ politicians in several developing countries, particularly in Latin America. at MIT Libraries on April 24, 2013 Hugo Cha´vez in Venezuela, the Kirchners in Argentina, Evo Morales in Bolivia, Alan Garcı´a in Peru, and Rafael Correa in Ecuador are some of the examples. The label populist is often
  • The End of Détente* a Case Study of the 1980 Moscow Olympics

    The End of Détente* a Case Study of the 1980 Moscow Olympics

    The End of Détente* A Case Study of the 1980 Moscow Olympics By Thomas Smith After the election of autonomous and must resist all pressure of any Jimmy Carter as US kind whatsoever, whether of a political, religious President, Prime or economic nature.”1 With British government Minister Margaret documents from 1980 recently released under the Thatcher flew to Thirty Year Rule, the time seems apt to evaluate the Washington on 17th debate about the Olympic boycott, and to ask the December 1979 for question: to what extent was the call by the British her first official visit. government for a boycott of the 1980 Moscow Five days later NATO Olympics an appropriate response to the invasion of announced the de- Afghanistan? ployment of a new Before the argument of the essay is established, it generation of American is first necessary to provide a brief narrative of the rockets and Cruise main events. Thatcher’s government began discussing missiles in Western the idea of a boycott in early January 1980; however, Europe. On the 25th their first action was to call for the Olympics to be December Soviet moved to a different location. Once the IOC declared troops marched into that relocating the Olympics was out of the question, Afghanistan. Thatcher told the House of Commons that she was now advising athletes not to go to Moscow and wrote Photo: U.S. Government to Sir Denis Follows, Chairman of the BOA, informing Introduction him of the government’s decision. The BOA, which was Britain’s NOC and the organisation that could During the 1970s, relations between the West and the accept or decline the invitation to the Olympics, Soviet Union were marked by an era of détente.
  • Mrs. Thatcher's Return to Victorian Values

    Mrs. Thatcher's Return to Victorian Values

    proceedings of the British Academy, 78, 9-29 Mrs. Thatcher’s Return to Victorian Values RAPHAEL SAMUEL University of Oxford I ‘VICTORIAN’was still being used as a routine term of opprobrium when, in the run-up to the 1983 election, Mrs. Thatcher annexed ‘Victorian values’ to her Party’s platform and turned them into a talisman for lost stabilities. It is still commonly used today as a byword for the repressive just as (a strange neologism of the 1940s) ‘Dickensian’ is used as a short-hand expression to describe conditions of squalor and want. In Mrs. Thatcher’s lexicon, ‘Victorian’ seems to have been an interchangeable term for the traditional and the old-fashioned, though when the occasion demanded she was not averse to using it in a perjorative sense. Marxism, she liked to say, was a Victorian, (or mid-Victorian) ideo1ogy;l and she criticised ninetenth-century paternalism as propounded by Disraeli as anachronistic.2 Read 12 December 1990. 0 The British Academy 1992. Thanks are due to Jonathan Clark and Christopher Smout for a critical reading of the first draft of this piece; to Fran Bennett of Child Poverty Action for advice on the ‘Scroungermania’ scare of 1975-6; and to the historians taking part in the ‘History Workshop’ symposium on ‘Victorian Values’ in 1983: Gareth Stedman Jones; Michael Ignatieff; Leonore Davidoff and Catherine Hall. Margaret Thatcher, Address to the Bow Group, 6 May 1978, reprinted in Bow Group, The Right Angle, London, 1979. ‘The Healthy State’, address to a Social Services Conference at Liverpool, 3 December 1976, in Margaret Thatcher, Let Our Children Grow Tall, London, 1977, p.
  • An International Journal for Students of Theological and Religious Studies Volume 36 Issue 3 November 2011

    An International Journal for Students of Theological and Religious Studies Volume 36 Issue 3 November 2011

    An International Journal for Students of Theological and Religious Studies Volume 36 Issue 3 November 2011 EDITORIAL: Spiritual Disciplines 377 D. A. Carson Jonathan Edwards: A Missionary? 380 Jonathan Gibson That All May Honour the Son: Holding Out for a 403 Deeper Christocentrism Andrew Moody An Evaluation of the 2011 Edition of the 415 New International Version Rodney J. Decker Pastoral PENSÉES: Friends: The One with Jesus, 457 Martha, and Mary; An Answer to Kierkegaard Melvin Tinker Book Reviews 468 DESCRIPTION Themelios is an international evangelical theological journal that expounds and defends the historic Christian faith. Its primary audience is theological students and pastors, though scholars read it as well. It was formerly a print journal operated by RTSF/UCCF in the UK, and it became a digital journal operated by The Gospel Coalition in 2008. The new editorial team seeks to preserve representation, in both essayists and reviewers, from both sides of the Atlantic. Themelios is published three times a year exclusively online at www.theGospelCoalition.org. It is presented in two formats: PDF (for citing pagination) and HTML (for greater accessibility, usability, and infiltration in search engines). Themelios is copyrighted by The Gospel Coalition. Readers are free to use it and circulate it in digital form without further permission (any print use requires further written permission), but they must acknowledge the source and, of course, not change the content. EDITORS BOOK ReVIEW EDITORS Systematic Theology and Bioethics Hans
  • François Mitterrand, of Germany and France

    François Mitterrand, of Germany and France

    François Mitterrand, Of Germany and France Caption: In 1996, François Mitterrand, President of France from 1981 to 1995, recalls the negative attitude of Margaret Thatcher, British Prime Minister, towards German reunification. Source: MITTERRAND, François. De l'Allemagne. De la France. Paris: Odile Jacob, 1996. 247 p. ISBN 2- 7381-0403-7. p. 39-44. Copyright: (c) Translation CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/francois_mitterrand_of_germany_and_france-en- 33ae0d5e-f55b-4476-aa6b-549648111114.html Last updated: 05/07/2016 1/3 François Mitterrand, Of Germany and France […] In Great Britain, on 10 November 1989, the Prime Minister’s Press Office published a statement in which Mrs Thatcher welcomed the lifting of the restrictions on movements of the population of East Germany towards the West, hoped that this would be a prelude to the dismantling of the Berlin Wall, looked forward to the installation of a democratic government in the German Democratic Republic and warned, ‘You have to take these things step by step.’ On the subject of unification, however, she said not a word. Three days later, at the Lord Mayor’s Banquet at the Guildhall in the City of London, she spoke about free elections and a multiparty system in East Germany, cooperation with the emerging democracies of Central Europe and the new role which NATO would have to play.
  • KGB Boss Says Robert Maxwell Was the Second Kissinger

    KGB Boss Says Robert Maxwell Was the Second Kissinger

    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 21, Number 32, August 12, 1994 boss says Robert axwe KGB M ll was the second Kissinger by Mark Burdman On the evening of July 28, Germany's ARD television net­ Margaret Thatcher, who was frantically trying to prevent work broadcast an extraordinary documentary on the life German reunification. and death of the late Robert Maxwell, the British publishing Stanislav Sorokin was one of several top-level former magnate and sleazy wheeler-and-dealer who died under mys­ Soviet intelligence and political insiders who freely com­ terious circumstances, his body found floating in the waters mented on Maxwell during the broadcast. For their own rea­ off Tenerife in the Canary Islands, on Nov. 5, 1991. The sons, these Russians are evidently intent on provoking an show, "Man Overboard," was co-produced by the firm Mit­ international discussion of, and investigation into, the mys­ teldeutscher Rundfunk, headquartered in Leipzig in eastern teries of capital flight operations out of the U.S.S.R. in the Germany, and Austria's Oesterreicher Rundfunk. It relied late 1980s-early 1990s. Former Soviet KGB chief Vladimir primarily on interviews with senior officials of the former Kryuchkov, a partner of Maxwell in numerous underhanded Soviet KGB and GRU intelligence services, who helped ventures who went to jail for his role in the failed August build the case that the circumstances of Maxwell's death 1991 putsch against Gorbachov, suggests in the concluding must have been intimately linked to efforts to cover up sensi­ moments of the broadcast, that f'the English-American [sic] tive Soviet Communist Party capital flightand capital transfer secret services, who are experienced enough, could, if they to the West in the last days of the U.S.S.R.
  • THE REPUBLICAN PARTY's MARCH to the RIGHT Cliff Checs Ter

    THE REPUBLICAN PARTY's MARCH to the RIGHT Cliff Checs Ter

    Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 29 | Number 4 Article 13 2002 EXTREMELY MOTIVATED: THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S MARCH TO THE RIGHT Cliff checS ter Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Part of the Accounting Law Commons Recommended Citation Cliff cheS cter, EXTREMELY MOTIVATED: THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S MARCH TO THE RIGHT, 29 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1663 (2002). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol29/iss4/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXTREMELY MOTIVATED: THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S MARCH TO THE RIGHT Cover Page Footnote Cliff cheS cter is a political consultant and public affairs writer. Cliff asw initially a frustrated Rockefeller Republican who now casts his lot with the New Democratic Movement of the Democratic Party. This article is available in Fordham Urban Law Journal: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol29/iss4/13 EXTREMELY MOTIVATED: THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S MARCH TO THE RIGHT by Cliff Schecter* 1. STILL A ROCK PARTY In the 2000 film The Contender, Senator Lane Hanson, por- trayed by Joan Allen, explains what catalyzed her switch from the Grand Old Party ("GOP") to the Democratic side of the aisle. During her dramatic Senate confirmation hearing for vice-presi- dent, she laments that "The Republican Party had shifted from the ideals I cherished in my youth." She lists those cherished ideals as "a woman's right to choose, taking guns out of every home, campaign finance reform, and the separation of church and state." Although this statement reflects Hollywood's usual penchant for oversimplification, her point con- cerning the recession of moderation in Republican ranks is still ap- ropos.
  • Neoconservatism Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative Hberkc Ch5 Mp 104 Rev1 Page 104 Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative Hberkc Ch5 Mp 105 Rev1 Page 105

    Neoconservatism Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative Hberkc Ch5 Mp 104 Rev1 Page 104 Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative Hberkc Ch5 Mp 105 Rev1 Page 105

    Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_103 rev1 page 103 part iii Neoconservatism Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_104 rev1 page 104 Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_105 rev1 page 105 chapter five The Neoconservative Journey Jacob Heilbrunn The Neoconservative Conspiracy The longer the United States struggles to impose order in postwar Iraq, the harsher indictments of the George W. Bush administration’s foreign policy are becoming. “Acquiring additional burdens by engag- ing in new wars of liberation is the last thing the United States needs,” declared one Bush critic in Foreign Affairs. “The principal problem is the mistaken belief that democracy is a talisman for all the world’s ills, and that the United States has a responsibility to promote dem- ocratic government wherever in the world it is lacking.”1 Does this sound like a Democratic pundit bashing Bush for par- tisan gain? Quite the contrary. The swipe came from Dimitri Simes, president of the Nixon Center and copublisher of National Interest. Simes is not alone in calling on the administration to reclaim the party’s pre-Reagan heritage—to abandon the moralistic, Wilsonian, neoconservative dream of exporting democracy and return to a more limited and realistic foreign policy that avoids the pitfalls of Iraq. 1. Dimitri K. Simes, “America’s Imperial Dilemma,” Foreign Affairs (Novem- ber/December 2003): 97, 100. Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_106 rev1 page 106 106 jacob heilbrunn In fact, critics on the Left and Right are remarkably united in their assessment of the administration. Both believe a neoconservative cabal has hijacked the administration’s foreign policy and has now overplayed its hand.
  • Margaret Thatcher, Thatcherism and Education

    Margaret Thatcher, Thatcherism and Education

    Commentary Reginald Edwards McGill University Margaret Thatcher, Thatcherism and Education The changes in educational policy in Britain that are being promoted by Margaret Thatcher's government are of such significance that educators in North America might be well advised to take notice of them. Professor Buck, in the Win ter issue of this journal, detailed many of these changes and compared them to the policies of Matthew Arnold. In this commentary, an attempt is made to examine the personal and political background of Margaret Thatcher and to draw sorne inferences about the origin of her ideas and policies, which have come to be known commonlyas "Thatcherism." Thatcher's personal background Margaret Roberts, born in Grantham, Lincolnshire, in 1925, began her education in a local primary school, and at the age of eleven began secondary education at the Kestevan and Grantham Grammar School for Girls. Admitted to Somerville College, Oxford, in 1943, she graduated in Science in 1946. In her final year she was the President of the Oxford University Conservative Association and, in this capacity, was invited to her first Annual Conference of the Conservative Party in 1946. She attended her second conference in 1948, as the representative of the Graduates' Association, and met representatives of the Dartford constituency. Asking to submit her name as a candidate for nomination, she was accepted, and she contested, unsuccessfully, the elections of 1950 and 1951 for that constituency. Through her political activities she met Dennis Thatcher, whom she married in an East London Methodist Chapel in December 1951. After marriage she began to study law, specializing in taxation law, and was adJTJitted to the Bar in 1954, one year after giving birth to twins.
  • The Reality Behind the Rhetoric Surrounding the British

    The Reality Behind the Rhetoric Surrounding the British

    ‘May Contain Nuts’? The reality behind the rhetoric surrounding the British Conservatives’ new group in the European Parliament Tim Bale, Seán Hanley, and Aleks Szczerbiak Forthcoming in Political Quarterly, January/March 2010 edition. Final version accepted for publication The British Conservative Party’s decision to leave the European Peoples’ Party-European Democrats (EPP-ED) group in the European Parliament (EP) and establish a new formation – the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) – has attracted a lot of criticism. Leading the charge have been the Labour government and left-liberal newspapers like the Guardian and the Observer, but there has been some ‘friendly fire’ as well. Former Conservative ministers - so-called ‘Tory grandees’ - and some of the party’s former MEPs have joined Foreign Office veterans in making their feelings known, as have media titles which are by no means consistently hostile to a Conservative Party that is at last looking likely to return to government.1 Much of the criticism originates from the suspicion that the refusal of other centre-right parties in Europe to countenance leaving the EPP has forced the Conservatives into an alliance with partners with whom they have – or at least should have – little in common. We question, or at least qualify, this assumption by looking in more detail at the other members of the ECR. We conclude that, while they are for the most part socially conservative, they are less extreme and more pragmatic than their media caricatures suggest. We also note that such caricatures ignore some interesting incompatibilities within the new group as a whole and between some of its Central and East European members and the Conservatives, not least 1 with regard to their foreign policy preoccupations and their by no means wholly hostile attitude to the European integration project.
  • The Soviet Collapse and the Charm of Hindsight 75

    The Soviet Collapse and the Charm of Hindsight 75

    The Soviet Collapse and the Charm of Hindsight 75 Chapter 4 The Soviet Collapse and the Charm of Hindsight Rodric Braithwaite Those on the spot always get some things wrong: memory later be- trays them. Those who subsequently try to disentangle the story always miss part of the context. In politics, perceptions and emotions are as important as reason. The theme of what follows is that we cannot un- derstand the causes and consequences of the Soviet collapse unless we take every account of its deep roots in the past and the strong emotions that accompanied it. It is of course imprudent, or even impertinent, for foreigners to pontificate about how “most Russians” think or feel. But it is an essential part of the story. In this deliberately personal account I attempt to recreate how the collapse looked to me at the time and in the aftermath, drawing on a detailed diary, my reporting to London, and on later writings. I. How it Looked at the Time A Kind of Democracy Poland shows the way I witnessed two attempts to bring a kind of democracy to the com- munist world. The Polish experiment of the late 1950s and the Soviet experiment of the late 1980s are now largely forgotten or ignored. Both are significant for the history of the time, and for an understanding of the events of today. In October 1956 the Poles expelled their Soviet advisers, abolished the collective farms, allowed people to travel abroad, and gave a de- gree of freedom to the press. They were encouraged by Khrushchev’s denunciation of Stalin, and driven by a combination of patriotism, a 75 76 exiting the cold war, entering a new world liberal faction inside the Party, and an alliance between students and workers.
  • Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher: a Political Marriage Pdf, Epub, Ebook

    Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher: a Political Marriage Pdf, Epub, Ebook

    RONALD REAGAN AND MARGARET THATCHER: A POLITICAL MARRIAGE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Nicholas Wapshott | 336 pages | 01 Dec 2008 | Penguin Putnam Inc | 9781595230539 | English | New York, United States Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher: A Political Marriage PDF Book The Reagan Files This book tells the rise to power of these two great leaders in the English-Speaking world. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Thatcher and Reagan had a very close relationship and shared a vision they pursued together. Learn how to enable JavaScript on your browser. A few things did bother me though I would still recommend this to any political wonk. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Apr 09, Sherri rated it really liked it. Read more On the surface they had little in common, in either background or personality. This was a fascinating character study on two indelible figures in conservative politics. President Reagan uses this letter to urge Prime Minister Thatcher to not prematurely remove British forces from Belize as Reagan argues doing so, before negotiations with Guatemala could be concluded, would negatively influence the outcome of those negotiations. In this short letter Prime Minister Thatcher "deplores" the terrorist incident in Lebanon. Get A Copy. Stock photo. No trivia or quizzes yet. Ex: I remember in grade school when they announced that Reagan had been shot and in high school when the Berlin Wall came down. First, it was very dry at times. National Library of Australia. Lady Thatcher spoke to the Virginia General Assembly. I enjoyed the stories that demonstrate how leaders of countries communicate and what they discuss in personal meetings, especially the conversations and relationships between Russian leaders and Regan and Thatcher.