Vertebrates from the Late Triassic Thecodontosaurus-Bearing Rocks Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vertebrates from the Late Triassic Thecodontosaurus-Bearing Rocks Of Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 125 (2014) 317–328 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pgeola Vertebrates from the Late Triassic Thecodontosaurus-bearing rocks of Durdham Down, Clifton (Bristol, UK) Davide Foffa *, David I. Whiteside, Pedro A. Viegas, Michael J. Benton School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Since the discovery of the basal sauropodomorph dinosaur Thecodontosaurus in the 1830s, the associated Received 12 October 2013 fauna from the Triassic fissures at Durdham Down (Bristol, UK) has not been investigated, largely Received in revised form 3 February 2014 because the quarries are built over. Other fissure sites around the Bristol Channel show that dinosaurs Accepted 7 February 2014 represented a minor part of the fauna of the Late Triassic archipelago. Here we present data on Available online 16 April 2014 microvertebrates from the original Durdham Down fissure rocks, which considerably expand the taxonomic diversity of the island fauna, revealing that it was dominated by the sphenodontian Keywords: Diphydontosaurus, and that archosauromorphs, including sphenosuchian crocodylomorphs, coelophy- Late Triassic soid theropods, and the basal sauropodomorph Thecodontosaurus, were diverse. Importantly, a few fish Fissure fills Archosaurs teeth provide new information about the debated age of the fissure deposit, which is identified as lower Sphenodontians Rhaetian. Thecodontosaurus had been assigned an age range over 20–25 Myr of the Late Triassic, so this Durdham Down narrower age determination (209.5–204 Myr) is important for studies of early dinosaurian evolution. Rhaetian ß 2014 The Geologists’ Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction tooth that was destroyed in 1940 during the Second World War and it is now considered Archosauria incertae sedis, thus nomen The Late Triassic palaeogeography of the region around Bristol dubium (Benton et al., 2000, 2012; Galton, 2007; Benton, 2012); the and South Wales (UK) consisted of an archipelago of small latter was originally represented by a heterodont phytosaur limestone islands lying in or near the tropics (Fig. 1A; Robinson, posterior tooth to which other undiagnostic material was added, 1957; Whiteside and Marshall, 2008). Well-documented terrestri- and it is also considered invalid (Benton et al., 2000, 2012; Galton, al vertebrate faunas from these fissure fills have been found in 2007; Benton, 2012). Halstead and Nicoll (1971) incorrectly many limestone quarries of the area, some such as Cromhall identified an articulated limb of the sphenodontian Clevosaurus (Fraser, 1994) and Tytherington (Whiteside, 1983; Whiteside and from Durdham Down; the specimen is actually Diphydontosaurus Marshall, 2008; Van den Berg et al., 2012) near Bristol (Fig. 1A), and (Whiteside, 1983; Whiteside and Marshall, 2008). The occurrence Pant-y-ffynon (Galton et al., 2007) in South Wales. The first of Clevosaurus at Durdham Down has, in fact, never been vertebrate fossils to be documented from these fissure fills were confirmed; reports of its presence by Whiteside (1983) and ‘saurians’ from Durdham Down in Bristol, named Thecodontosaurus Whiteside and Marshall (2008) were contradicted by Van den Berg by Riley and Stutchbury (1836), and with the species name T. et al. (2012), as the evidence was poor. antiquus added later (Morris, 1843). Historical materials from Durdham Down are in the collections Some additional taxa were reported from the Durdham Down of Bristol City Museum, the Natural History Museum, London, Yale fissure deposits. Riley and Stutchbury (1836, 1840) identified two Peabody Museum, and the National Academy of Sciences in species of their new genus Palaeosaurus, namely P. cylindrodon Philadelphia (Benton, 2012). We have had the unique opportunity (= Palaeosauriscus Kuhn, 1959) and P. platyodon (= Rileyasuchus to acid prepare a representative sample of these original Kuhn, 1961), both of which are now considered nomina nuda Thecodontosaurus-bearing rocks, collected in the 1830s from the (Benton et al., 2000; Galton, 2007). The first was based on a single quarries at Durdham Down, and can therefore for the first time make a detailed analysis of its poorly known microvertebrate fauna; moreover, we mechanically prepared and re-described controversial material from the historical collection. In this paper, * Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 7741622920. E-mail address: [email protected] (D. Foffa). we present the first extensive study on the microvertebrate fauna http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2014.02.002 0016-7878/ß 2014 The Geologists’ Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 318 D. Foffa et al. / Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 125 (2014) 317–328 Fig. 1. Geology of Durdham Down fissure. (A) Palaeogeographical map of the Bristol area in the Late Triassic (205 Ma) showing inferred palaeo-highs with superimposed modern geography. (B) Simplified geological map of Durdham Down, with 19th century quarry locations. Geology mapping and column derived from BGS map 264. The Dolomitic conglomerate, Mercia Mudstone Group and Penarth Group are Late Triassic. The other strata are Early Carboniferous. of the Durdham Down fissures to provide an overview of all Fraser, 1994; Benton and Spencer, 1995; Whiteside and Marshall, identifiable fossils, to reconstruct the contemporary ecosystem in 2008), but exact dating has been possible only for Tytherington. which the early dinosaur Thecodontosaurus lived, and to date the That age assignment is based principally on the association of fauna. Institutional abbreviations: BRSMG, Bristol City Museum & Rhaetian palynomorphs and marine phytoplankton with Theco- Art Gallery collection; BRSUG, Bristol University, School of Earth dontosaurus and/or other reptiles in six fissures including fissure 2 Sciences collection. at Tytherington quarry, described by Marshall and Whiteside (1980) and Whiteside and Marshall (2008), who also reported an 2. Geological and palaeoenvironmental setting association of the terrestrial reptiles with fish fossils found in the Penarth Group, particularly the Westbury Formation (lower The Durdham Down quarries in Clifton were exploited for the Rhaetian). Whiteside and Marshall (2008) also argued that there extraction of Carboniferous Limestone, which was used as a was no evidence that these Late Triassic fissure faunas are older building material. When quarrying ended about 1840, the quarries than the Rhaetian transgression, through a comparison of the were filled and/or became building sites; for this reason, the exact terrestrial faunas, Penarth Group fishes and geological field location of the fissure deposits of the 1830s cannot be certain. The relations. Currently, the consensus is that the Durdham Down Thecodontosaurus bones collected in the 1830s, and now in BRSMG, Thecodontosaurus-bearing deposits can be dated as Rhaetian could have come from anywhere in the string of quarries between (Whiteside, 1983; Galton, 2007; Benton, 2012) based on the Worrall Road to the south, and Upper Belgrave Road to the north conspecific Thecodontosaurus remains from fissure 2 at Tyther- (Fig. 1B). No contemporary documents survive, but the sum of ington. eyewitness accounts, and reported eyewitness accounts, was This has not always been the view, and it is often assumed that summarised in Benton et al. (2000), Galton (2007), and Benton Thecodontosaurus is Carnian in age, some 20–25 Myr older than the (2012). The best surviving quarry wall, with a Triassic-age fissure early Rhaetian. This discrepancy in age is significant because cutting down into the Carboniferous Limestone is at the east end of Thecodontosaurus is phylogenetically a basal sauropodomorph the series of quarries, beside Quarry Steps, and this was designated dinosaur, and the earlier date provides a different pattern of timing as a Site of Special Scientific Interest (Benton and Spencer, 1995). for this part of the dinosaur phylogenetic tree. The Carnian age was Further evidence that this is the most likely location was assumed early: for example, Moore (1881) did report ‘Rhaetic’ established by a team from the Bristol Dinosaur Project, who bone bed fossils from the quarry at Durdham Down, but decided found Thecodontosaurus and Diphydontosaurus fossils in a collec- that the Thecodontosaurus bones were more likely considerably tion of rocks from walls around the old quarry. older, equivalent to Carnian. Robinson (1957) viewed faunas from As in many similar sites in the SW of Great Britain, karstic these types of fissure as Norian, and this view was followed by features such as fissures and cave systems developed in the Benton (1991), who presented the time range of Thecodontosaur- uplifted and steeply dipping Carboniferous limestones. The infills idae as late Carnian to Rhaetian. Benton and Spencer (1995) noted of the cavernous voids frequently contain fossils, following cavern the similarity of Thecodontosaurus from Durdham Down with collapse and meteoritic waters washing lateritic soil and limestone materials from Tytherington, and its early Rhaetian age, but further debris, including blocks of unaltered Carboniferous limestone, into noted also the phylogenetically basal position of the genus among these cavities. The fossil-bearing rock contains layers of conglom- sauropodomorphs, and so hinted at a late Carnian age. Benton et al. erate with grey Carboniferous
Recommended publications
  • Macroevolutionary Patterns in Rhynchocephalia: Is the Tuatara (Sphenodon Punctatus) a Living Fossil? Palaeontology, 60(3), 319-328
    Herrera Flores, J., Stubbs, T., & Benton, M. (2017). Macroevolutionary patterns in Rhynchocephalia: is the tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus) a living fossil? Palaeontology, 60(3), 319-328. DOI: 10.1111/pala.12284 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record License (if available): CC BY Link to published version (if available): 10.1111/pala.12284 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms.html [Palaeontology, 2017, pp. 1–10] MACROEVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS IN RHYNCHOCEPHALIA: IS THE TUATARA (SPHENODON PUNCTATUS) A LIVING FOSSIL? by JORGEA.HERRERA-FLORES , THOMAS L. STUBBS and MICHAEL J. BENTON School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, UK; jorge.herrerafl[email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Typescript received 4 July 2016; accepted in revised form 19 January 2017 Abstract: The tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus, known from since the Triassic, rhynchocephalians had heterogeneous rates 32 small islands around New Zealand, has often been noted of morphological evolution and occupied wide mor- as a classic ‘living fossil’ because of its apparently close phospaces during the Triassic and Jurassic, and these then resemblance to its Mesozoic forebears and because of a long, declined in the Cretaceous. In particular, we demonstrate low-diversity history. This designation has been disputed that the extant tuatara underwent unusually slow lineage because of the wide diversity of Mesozoic forms and because evolution, and is morphologically conservative, being located of derived adaptations in living Sphenodon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Braincase, Brain and Palaeobiology of the Basal Sauropodomorph Dinosaur Thecodontosaurus Antiquus
    applyparastyle “fig//caption/p[1]” parastyle “FigCapt” Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2020, XX, 1–22. With 10 figures. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/advance-article/doi/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa157/6032720 by University of Bristol Library user on 14 December 2020 The braincase, brain and palaeobiology of the basal sauropodomorph dinosaur Thecodontosaurus antiquus ANTONIO BALLELL1,*, J. LOGAN KING1, JAMES M. NEENAN2, EMILY J. RAYFIELD1 and MICHAEL J. BENTON1 1School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK 2Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK Received 27 May 2020; revised 15 October 2020; accepted for publication 26 October 2020 Sauropodomorph dinosaurs underwent drastic changes in their anatomy and ecology throughout their evolution. The Late Triassic Thecodontosaurus antiquus occupies a basal position within Sauropodomorpha, being a key taxon for documenting how those morphofunctional transitions occurred. Here, we redescribe the braincase osteology and reconstruct the neuroanatomy of Thecodontosaurus, based on computed tomography data. The braincase of Thecodontosaurus shares the presence of medial basioccipital components of the basal tubera and a U-shaped basioccipital–parabasisphenoid suture with other basal sauropodomorphs and shows a distinct combination of characters: a straight outline of the braincase floor, an undivided metotic foramen, an unossified gap, large floccular fossae, basipterygoid processes perpendicular to the cultriform process in lateral view and a rhomboid foramen magnum. We reinterpret these braincase features in the light of new discoveries in dinosaur anatomy. Our endocranial reconstruction reveals important aspects of the palaeobiology of Thecodontosaurus, supporting a bipedal stance and cursorial habits, with adaptations to retain a steady head and gaze while moving.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Archosaur Phylogeny and the Relationships of the Crocodylia
    8. Archosaur phylogeny and the relationships of the Crocodylia MICHAEL J. BENTON Department of Geology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK JAMES M. CLARK* Department of Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA Abstract The Archosauria include the living crocodilians and birds, as well as the fossil dinosaurs, pterosaurs, and basal 'thecodontians'. Cladograms of the basal archosaurs and of the crocodylomorphs are given in this paper. There are three primitive archosaur groups, the Proterosuchidae, the Erythrosuchidae, and the Proterochampsidae, which fall outside the crown-group (crocodilian line plus bird line), and these have been defined as plesions to a restricted Archosauria by Gauthier. The Early Triassic Euparkeria may also fall outside this crown-group, or it may lie on the bird line. The crown-group of archosaurs divides into the Ornithosuchia (the 'bird line': Orn- ithosuchidae, Lagosuchidae, Pterosauria, Dinosauria) and the Croco- dylotarsi nov. (the 'crocodilian line': Phytosauridae, Crocodylo- morpha, Stagonolepididae, Rauisuchidae, and Poposauridae). The latter three families may form a clade (Pseudosuchia s.str.), or the Poposauridae may pair off with Crocodylomorpha. The Crocodylomorpha includes all crocodilians, as well as crocodi- lian-like Triassic and Jurassic terrestrial forms. The Crocodyliformes include the traditional 'Protosuchia', 'Mesosuchia', and Eusuchia, and they are defined by a large number of synapomorphies, particularly of the braincase and occipital regions. The 'protosuchians' (mainly Early *Present address: Department of Zoology, Storer Hall, University of California, Davis, Cali- fornia, USA. The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Volume 1: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds (ed. M.J. Benton), Systematics Association Special Volume 35A . pp. 295-338. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Slater, TS, Duffin, CJ, Hildebrandt, C., Davies, TG, & Benton, MJ
    Slater, T. S., Duffin, C. J., Hildebrandt, C., Davies, T. G., & Benton, M. J. (2016). Microvertebrates from multiple bone beds in the Rhaetian of the M4–M5 motorway junction, South Gloucestershire, U.K. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 127(4), 464-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2016.07.001 Peer reviewed version License (if available): CC BY-NC-ND Link to published version (if available): 10.1016/j.pgeola.2016.07.001 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Elsevier at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016787816300773. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ *Manuscript Click here to view linked References 1 1 Microvertebrates from multiple bone beds in the Rhaetian of the M4-M5 1 2 3 2 motorway junction, South Gloucestershire, U.K. 4 5 3 6 7 a b,c,d b b 8 4 Tiffany S. Slater , Christopher J. Duffin , Claudia Hildebrandt , Thomas G. Davies , 9 10 5 Michael J. Bentonb*, 11 12 a 13 6 Institute of Science and the Environment, University of Worcester, Worcester, WR2 6AJ, UK 14 15 7 bSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, UK 16 17 c 18 8 146 Church Hill Road, Sutton, Surrey SM3 8NF, UK 19 20 9 dEarth Science Department, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 21 22 23 10 5BD, UK 24 25 11 ABSTRACT 26 27 12 The Rhaetian (latest Triassic) is best known for its basal bone bed, but there are numerous 28 29 30 13 other bone-rich horizons in the succession.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Continental Late Triassic Tetrapod Biochronology. I. the Type Locality of Saturnalia Tupiniquim and the Faunal Succession in South Brazil
    Journal of South American Earth Sciences 19 (2005) 205–218 www.elsevier.com/locate/jsames Studies on continental Late Triassic tetrapod biochronology. I. The type locality of Saturnalia tupiniquim and the faunal succession in south Brazil Max Cardoso Langer* Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP, Universidade de Sa˜o Paulo (USP), Av. Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-901 Ribeira˜o Preto, SP, Brazil Received 1 November 2003; accepted 1 January 2005 Abstract Late Triassic deposits of the Parana´ Basin, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, encompass a single third-order, tetrapod-bearing sedimentary sequence that includes parts of the Alemoa Member (Santa Maria Formation) and the Caturrita Formation. A rich, diverse succession of terrestrial tetrapod communities is recorded in these sediments, which can be divided into at least three faunal associations. The stem- sauropodomorph Saturnalia tupiniquim was collected in the locality known as ‘Waldsanga’ near the city of Santa Maria. In that area, the deposits of the Alemoa Member yield the ‘Alemoa local fauna,’ which typifies the first association; includes the rhynchosaur Hyperodapedon, aetosaurs, and basal dinosaurs; and is coeval with the lower fauna of the Ischigualasto Formation, Bermejo Basin, NW Argentina. The second association is recorded in deposits of both the Alemoa Member and the Caturrita Formation, characterized by the rhynchosaur ‘Scaphonyx’ sulcognathus and the cynodont Exaeretodon, and correlated with the upper fauna of the Ischigualasto Formation. Various isolated outcrops of the Caturrita Formation yield tetrapod fossils that correspond to post-Ischigualastian faunas but might not belong to a single faunal association. The record of the dicynodont Jachaleria suggests correlations with the lower part of the Los Colorados Formation, NW Argentina, whereas remains of derived tritheledontid cynodonts indicate younger ages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sclerotic Ring: Evolutionary Trends in Squamates
    The sclerotic ring: Evolutionary trends in squamates by Jade Atkins A Thesis Submitted to Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Applied Science July, 2014, Halifax Nova Scotia © Jade Atkins, 2014 Approved: Dr. Tamara Franz-Odendaal Supervisor Approved: Dr. Matthew Vickaryous External Examiner Approved: Dr. Tim Fedak Supervisory Committee Member Approved: Dr. Ron Russell Supervisory Committee Member Submitted: July 30, 2014 Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my family, friends, and mentors who helped me get to where I am today. Thank you. ! ii Table of Contents Title page ........................................................................................................................ i Dedication ...................................................................................................................... ii List of figures ................................................................................................................. v List of tables ................................................................................................................ vii Abstract .......................................................................................................................... x List of abbreviations and definitions ............................................................................ xi Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Early Evolution of Dinosaurs
    Biol. Rev. (2010), 85, pp. 55–110. 55 doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00094.x The origin and early evolution of dinosaurs Max C. Langer1∗,MartinD.Ezcurra2, Jonathas S. Bittencourt1 and Fernando E. Novas2,3 1Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP, Universidade de S˜ao Paulo; Av. Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeir˜ao Preto-SP, Brazil 2Laboratorio de Anatomia Comparada y Evoluci´on de los Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘‘Bernardino Rivadavia’’, Avda. Angel Gallardo 470, Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina 3CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas y T´ecnicas); Avda. Rivadavia 1917 - Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina (Received 28 November 2008; revised 09 July 2009; accepted 14 July 2009) ABSTRACT The oldest unequivocal records of Dinosauria were unearthed from Late Triassic rocks (approximately 230 Ma) accumulated over extensional rift basins in southwestern Pangea. The better known of these are Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis, Pisanosaurus mertii, Eoraptor lunensis,andPanphagia protos from the Ischigualasto Formation, Argentina, and Staurikosaurus pricei and Saturnalia tupiniquim from the Santa Maria Formation, Brazil. No uncontroversial dinosaur body fossils are known from older strata, but the Middle Triassic origin of the lineage may be inferred from both the footprint record and its sister-group relation to Ladinian basal dinosauromorphs. These include the typical Marasuchus lilloensis, more basal forms such as Lagerpeton and Dromomeron, as well as silesaurids: a possibly monophyletic group composed of Mid-Late Triassic forms that may represent immediate sister taxa to dinosaurs. The first phylogenetic definition to fit the current understanding of Dinosauria as a node-based taxon solely composed of mutually exclusive Saurischia and Ornithischia was given as ‘‘all descendants of the most recent common ancestor of birds and Triceratops’’.
    [Show full text]
  • Deraetal09neodyme.Pdf
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 286 (2009) 198–207 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Water mass exchange and variations in seawater temperature in the NW Tethys during the Early Jurassic: Evidence from neodymium and oxygen isotopes of fish teeth and belemnites Guillaume Dera a,⁎, Emmanuelle Pucéat a, Pierre Pellenard a, Pascal Neige a, Dominique Delsate b, Michael M. Joachimski c, Laurie Reisberg d, Mathieu Martinez a a UMR CNRS 5561 Biogéosciences, Université de Bourgogne, 6 bd Gabriel, 21000 Dijon, France b Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 25 rue Münster, 2160 Luxembourg, Luxemburg c GeoZentrum Nordbayern, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schlossgarten 5, 91054 Erlangen, Germany d Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques (CRPG), Nancy-Université, CNRS, 15 rue Notre Dame des Pauvres, 54501 Vandoeuvre lès Nancy, France article info abstract Article history: Oxygen and neodymium isotope analyses performed on biostratigraphically well-dated fish remains Received 2 December 2008 recovered from the Hettangian to Toarcian of the Paris Basin were used to reconstruct variations of Early Received in revised form 17 June 2009 Jurassic seawater temperature and to track oceanographic changes in the NW Tethys. Our results indicate a Accepted 21 June 2009 strong correlation between δ18O trends recorded by fish remains and belemnites, confirming the Available online 16 July 2009 paleoenvironmental origin of oxygen isotope variations. Interestingly, temperatures recorded by pelagic fi fi Editor: M.L. Delaney shes and nektobenthic belemnites and bottom dwelling shes are comparable during the Late Pliensbachian sea-level lowstand but gradually differ during the Early Toarcian transgressive episode, Keywords: recording a difference in water temperatures of ~6 °C during the Bifrons Zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham the Earliest Bird-Line Archosaurs and The
    University of Birmingham The earliest bird-line archosaurs and the assembly of the dinosaur body plan Nesbitt, Sterling; Butler, Richard; Ezcurra, Martin; Barrett, Paul; Stocker, Michelle; Angielczyk, Kenneth; Smith, Roger; Sidor, Christian; Niedzwiedzki, Grzegorz; Sennikov, Andrey; Charig, Alan DOI: 10.1038/nature22037 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Nesbitt, S, Butler, R, Ezcurra, M, Barrett, P, Stocker, M, Angielczyk, K, Smith, R, Sidor, C, Niedzwiedzki, G, Sennikov, A & Charig, A 2017, 'The earliest bird-line archosaurs and the assembly of the dinosaur body plan', Nature, vol. 544, no. 7651, pp. 484-487. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22037 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Checked for eligibility: 03/03/2017. General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaur Remains from the 'Botucaraí Hill' (Caturrita Formation), Late
    This article was downloaded by: [Jonathas Souza Bittencourt] On: 17 August 2012, At: 06:23 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ghbi20 Dinosaur remains from the ‘Botucaraí Hill’ (Caturrita Formation), Late Triassic of south Brazil, and their stratigraphic context Jonathas Souza Bittencourt a b , Átila Augusto Stock da Rosa c , Cesar Leandro Schultz d & Max Cardoso Langer a a Departamento de Biologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes 3900, 1404-901, Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil b Departamento de Geologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos 6670, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte (MG), Brazil c Departamento de Geociências, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Av. Roraima 1000, 97105-900, Santa Maria (RS), Brazil d Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves 9500, 91501-970, Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil Version of record first published: 17 Aug 2012 To cite this article: Jonathas Souza Bittencourt, Átila Augusto Stock da Rosa, Cesar Leandro Schultz & Max Cardoso Langer (2012): Dinosaur remains from the ‘Botucaraí Hill’ (Caturrita Formation), Late Triassic of south Brazil, and their stratigraphic context, Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology, DOI:10.1080/08912963.2012.694881 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2012.694881 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Re-Evaluation of the Enigmatic Dinosauriform Caseosaurus Crosbyensis from the Late Triassic of Texas, USA and Its Implications for Early Dinosaur Evolution
    A re-evaluation of the enigmatic dinosauriform Caseosaurus crosbyensis from the Late Triassic of Texas, USA and its implications for early dinosaur evolution MATTHEW G. BARON and MEGAN E. WILLIAMS Baron, M.G. and Williams, M.E. 2018. A re-evaluation of the enigmatic dinosauriform Caseosaurus crosbyensis from the Late Triassic of Texas, USA and its implications for early dinosaur evolution. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 63 (1): 129–145. The holotype specimen of the Late Triassic dinosauriform Caseosaurus crosbyensis is redescribed and evaluated phylogenetically for the first time, providing new anatomical information and data on the earliest dinosaurs and their evolution within the dinosauromorph lineage. Historically, Caseosaurus crosbyensis has been considered to represent an early saurischian dinosaur, and often a herrerasaur. More recent work on Triassic dinosaurs has cast doubt over its supposed dinosaurian affinities and uncertainty about particular features in the holotype and only known specimen has led to the species being regarded as a dinosauriform of indeterminate position. Here, we present a new diagnosis for Caseosaurus crosbyensis and refer additional material to the taxon—a partial right ilium from Snyder Quarry. Our com- parisons and phylogenetic analyses suggest that Caseosaurus crosbyensis belongs in a clade with herrerasaurs and that this clade is the sister taxon of Dinosauria, rather than positioned within it. This result, along with other recent analyses of early dinosaurs, pulls apart what remains of the “traditional” group of dinosaurs collectively termed saurischians into a polyphyletic assemblage and implies that Dinosauria should be regarded as composed exclusively of Ornithoscelida (Ornithischia + Theropoda) and Sauropodomorpha. In addition, our analysis recovers the enigmatic European taxon Saltopus elginensis among herrerasaurs for the first time.
    [Show full text]