DOCSLIB.ORG

Updated 3/12/21 DISTRICT WARD/REGION POSITION TERM VOTE for FULL NAME PARTY 11/1/02 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JUDGE 6 YEAR TERM VOTE for 1 THOMAS F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Updated 3/12/21 DISTRICT WARD/REGION POSITION TERM VOTE for FULL NAME PARTY 11/1/02 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JUDGE 6 YEAR TERM VOTE for 1 THOMAS F Updated 3/12/21 DISTRICT WARD/REGION POSITION TERM VOTE FOR FULL NAME PARTY 11/1/02 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JUDGE 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 THOMAS F. MALLOY SR. CROSS FILED 11/2/01 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JUDGE 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 JOSEPH J. CARMODY CROSS FILED 11/3/08 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JUDGE 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 JOSEPH D. SPAGNUOLO JR. CROSS FILED ALL PRECINCTS WITHIN LUZERNE COUNTY COUNTY COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 SHEILA SAIDMAN DEMOCRATIC ALL PRECINCTS WITHIN LUZERNE COUNTY COUNTY COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 JANE WALSH WAITKUS DEMOCRATIC ALL PRECINCTS WITHIN LUZERNE COUNTY COUNTY COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 MARYANN V. VELEZ DEMOCRATIC ALL PRECINCTS WITHIN LUZERNE COUNTY COUNTY COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 JIMMY SABATINO DEMOCRATIC ALL PRECINCTS WITHIN LUZERNE COUNTY COUNTY COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 MATTHEW VOUGH DEMOCRATIC ALL PRECINCTS WITHIN LUZERNE COUNTY COUNTY COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 GREGORY S. WOLOVICH JR. REPUBLICAN ALL PRECINCTS WITHIN LUZERNE COUNTY COUNTY COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 CHRIS R. PERRY REPUBLICAN ALL PRECINCTS WITHIN LUZERNE COUNTY COUNTY COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 RONALD D. KNAPP REPUBLICAN ALL PRECINCTS WITHIN LUZERNE COUNTY COUNTY COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 JOHN LOMBARDO REPUBLICAN ALL PRECINCTS WITHIN LUZERNE COUNTY COUNTY COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 BRIAN THORNTON REPUBLICAN ALL PRECINCTS WITHIN LUZERNE COUNTY COUNTY COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 MARTIN L. DARTOE REPUBLICAN ALL PRECINCTS WITHIN LUZERNE COUNTY COUNTY COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 KEVIN LESCAVAGE REPUBLICAN ALL PRECINCTS WITHIN LUZERNE COUNTY COUNTY COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 CARL G. BIENIAS III REPUBLICAN ALL PRECINCTS WITHIN LUZERNE COUNTY COUNTY COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 MICHAEL G. VACENDAK REPUBLICAN ALL PRECINCTS WITHIN LUZERNE COUNTY CONTROLLER 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 MICHELLE BEDNAR DEMOCRATIC ALL PRECINCTS WITHIN LUZERNE COUNTY CONTROLLER 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 WALTER L. GRIFFITH JR. REPUBLICAN ASHLEY BOROUGH WARD 1 INSPECTOR OF ELECTIONS 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 DOROTHY M. HESS REPUBLICAN ASHLEY BOROUGH BOROUGH MAYOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 BRIAN S. DEMCHAK DEMOCRATIC ASHLEY BOROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 3 ANDREW JOSEPH POTSKO DEMOCRATIC ASHLEY BOROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 3 JONELLE MCGYLNN DEMOCRATIC ASHLEY BOROUGH INSPECTOR OF ELECTIONS 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 CAROL E. COLEMAN REPUBLICAN ASHLEY BOROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 3 JENNIFER HELLER DEMOCRATIC ASHLEY BOROUGH TAX COLLECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 ROBERT W. SHOEMAKER DEMOCRATIC ASHLEY BOROUGH WARD 1 CONSTABLE 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 PETER FISCHER DEMOCRATIC AVOCA BOROUGH WARD 1 BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 2 HOLLY ANN HOMSCHEK DEMOCRATIC AVOCA BOROUGH WARD 1 BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 2 DENNIS O'BRIEN DEMOCRATIC AVOCA BOROUGH TAX COLLECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 ANN THERESE WRUBEL DEMOCRATIC AVOCA BOROUGH WARD 3 BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 GERALD ROBERT DOMMERMUTH III DEMOCRATIC AVOCA BOROUGH WARD 3 INSPECTOR OF ELECTIONS 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 ANN MARIE WILLIAMS DEMOCRATIC AVOCA BOROUGH WARD 1 BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 2 FRANK MICHAEL MARRIGGI SR. DEMOCRATIC AVOCA BOROUGH MAYOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 ROBERT MULLEN DEMOCRATIC AVOCA BOROUGH WARD 2 BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 2 COLLEEN VELEHOSKI DEMOCRATIC AVOCA BOROUGH WARD 2 BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 2 ALAN KIESINGER DEMOCRATIC AVOCA BOROUGH WARD 2 BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 2 STANLEY J. WALESKI DEMOCRATIC AVOCA BOROUGH WARD 3 JUDGE OF ELECTIONS 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 MADELINE P. CALABRO DEMOCRATIC AVOCA BOROUGH WARD 3 INSPECTOR OF ELECTIONS 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 LINDA SABITUS DEMOCRATIC AVOCA BOROUGH WARD 3 CONSTABLE 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 PAUL J. WILLIAMSON DEMOCRATIC AVOCA BOROUGH MAYOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 JOHN D. BOONE DEMOCRATIC AVOCA BOROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 3 KYLER J. KOVALESKI DEMOCRATIC BEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP TAX COLLECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 TRACEY GEORGE O'DAY DEMOCRATIC BEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP TOWNSHIP SUPERVISOR 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 ROBERT E. SUCHOCKI JR. REPUBLICAN BEAR CREEK VILLAGE BOROUGH INSPECTOR OF ELECTIONS 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 ANN MARIE DRESSEN REPUBLICAN BEAR CREEK VILLAGE BOROUGH JUDGE OF ELECTIONS 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 MARY A. MURPHY DEMOCRATIC BEAR CREEK VILLAGE BOROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 2 CLAIRE SCHECHTER DEMOCRATIC BEAR CREEK VILLAGE BOROUGH CONSTABLE 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 GEORGE W. HUTTER REPUBLICAN BEAR CREEK VILLAGE BOROUGH BOROUGH CONTROLLER 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 THOMAS B. HAMEL REPUBLICAN BEAR CREEK VILLAGE BOROUGH INSPECTOR OF ELECTIONS 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 FRANK L. BUTRY REPUBLICAN BEAR CREEK VILLAGE BOROUGH MAYOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 WALTER S. MITCHELL JR. REPUBLICAN BLACK CREEK TOWNSHIP TAX COLLECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 SANDRA K. HOUSEKNECHT REPUBLICAN BLACK CREEK TOWNSHIP AUDITOR 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 STEPHEN CHARLES BRUNO REPUBLICAN BLACK CREEK TOWNSHIP AUDITOR 2 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 BARBARA AGRESTA REPUBLICAN BLACK CREEK TOWNSHIP CONSTABLE 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 VINCENT L. JONES REPUBLICAN BLACK CREEK TOWNSHIP INSPECTOR OF ELECTIONS 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 MICHELLE L. MOSER DEMOCRATIC BLACK CREEK TOWNSHIP TOWNSHIP SUPERVISOR 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 DONNA M. LUPCHO REPUBLICAN BLACK CREEK TOWNSHIP JUDGE OF ELECTIONS 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 SHANNON DRASHER REPUBLICAN BUCK TOWNSHIP TOWNSHIP SUPERVISOR 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 2 JENNIFER LYNN FULLER DEMOCRATIC BUCK TOWNSHIP TAX COLLECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 DEBORAH PICARD DEMOCRATIC BUTLER TOWNSHIP TOWNSHIP SUPERVISOR 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 BRIAN KISENWETHER REPUBLICAN BUTLER TOWNSHIP TOWNSHIP SUPERVISOR 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 MICHAEL J. REICH REPUBLICAN BUTLER TOWNSHIP AUDITOR 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 JEFFREY NESLER DEMOCRATIC BUTLER TOWNSHIP JUDGE OF ELECTIONS 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 DOMONIC YANNUZZI REPUBLICAN BUTLER TOWNSHIP TAX COLLECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 NANCY J. FREDERICK REPUBLICAN BUTLER TOWNSHIP TAX COLLECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 MICHELE A. GOOD REPUBLICAN CONYNGHAM BOROUGH INSPECTOR OF ELECTIONS 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 ROBERT M. HOPPY DEMOCRATIC CONYNGHAM BOROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 3 CHESTER P. BARTLINSKI REPUBLICAN CONYNGHAM BOROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 3 MARY VEET REPUBLICAN CONYNGHAM BOROUGH CONSTABLE 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 JESUS C. COLON REPUBLICAN CONYNGHAM TOWNSHIP TOWNSHIP SUPERVISOR 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 RON YOUNG DEMOCRATIC CONYNGHAM TOWNSHIP CONSTABLE 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 TINA REMENSNYDER DEMOCRATIC CONYNGHAM TOWNSHIP TAX COLLECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 SANDRA WALP REPUBLICAN COURTDALE BOROUGH INSPECTOR OF ELECTIONS 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 JAMES J. MAZEITIS DEMOCRATIC COURTDALE BOROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 4 JOSEPH G. RISH REPUBLICAN COURTDALE BOROUGH JUDGE OF ELECTIONS 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 JOSEPH J. MATELLO DEMOCRATIC COURTDALE BOROUGH INSPECTOR OF ELECTIONS 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 BEVERLY J. MATELLO DEMOCRATIC COURTDALE BOROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 4 JEFFREY E. FORD DEMOCRATIC COURTDALE BOROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 4 THOMAS J. VEST REPUBLICAN COURTDALE BOROUGH TAX COLLECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 CAROLYN ZABLOTNEY REPUBLICAN COURTDALE BOROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 4 AMY RUSH YUHAS DEMOCRATIC COURTDALE BOROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 4 MICHAEL WALSIN REPUBLICAN CRESTWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 4 BARRY L. BOONE CROSS FILED CRESTWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 4 RANDY SWANK CROSS FILED CRESTWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 4 JOHN MACRI CROSS FILED CRESTWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 4 MICHAEL P. MAGUIRE CROSS FILED DALLAS BOROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 2 ROBERT G. EDGERTON JR. REPUBLICAN DALLAS BOROUGH BOROUGH MAYOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 TIMOTHY J. CARROLL REPUBLICAN DALLAS BOROUGH TAX COLLECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 MARK W. VANETTEN JR. REPUBLICAN DALLAS BOROUGH WARD 1 CONSTABLE 6 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 HARRY M. VIVIAN REPUBLICAN DALLAS BOROUGH WARD 2 JUDGE OF ELECTIONS 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 JESSICAN FRENCH MORGAN REPUBLICAN DALLAS BOROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 2 LEE W. ECKERT JR. REPUBLICAN DALLAS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 2 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 DONNA M. CUPINSKI CROSS FILED DALLAS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 DONNA M. CUPINSKI CROSS FILED DALLAS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 CANDYCE J. FIKE CROSS FILED DALLAS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 2 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 SUSAN KATHLEEN ALLEN DEMOCRATIC DALLAS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 SUSAN KATHLEEN ALLEN DEMOCRATIC DALLAS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 MICHAEL DIMARE CROSS FILED DALLAS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 DAVID BOND JR. CROSS FILED DALLAS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 CHRISTINE J. SWAILES CROSS FILED DALLAS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 AMANDA FANECK CROSS FILED DALLAS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 2 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 JOSEPH LEONARD CROSS FILED DALLAS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 KELLEY K. KAVANAGH-WATKINS CROSS FILED DALLAS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 2 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 1 KELLEY K. KAVANAGH-WATKINS CROSS FILED DALLAS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DIRECTOR 4 YEAR TERM VOTE FOR 5 SHERRI L.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Government Primer
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT PRIMER Alaska Municipal League Alaskan Local Government Primer Alaska Municipal League The Alaska Municipal League (AML) is a voluntary, Table of Contents nonprofit, nonpartisan, statewide organization of 163 cities, boroughs, and unified municipalities, Purpose of Primer............ Page 3 representing over 97 percent of Alaska's residents. Originally organized in 1950, the League of Alaska Cities............................Pages 4-5 Cities became the Alaska Municipal League in 1962 when boroughs joined the League. Boroughs......................Pages 6-9 The mission of the Alaska Municipal League is to: Senior Tax Exemption......Page 10 1. Represent the unified voice of Alaska's local Revenue Sharing.............Page 11 governments to successfully influence state and federal decision making. 2. Build consensus and partnerships to address Alaska's Challenges, and Important Local Government Facts: 3. Provide training and joint services to strengthen ♦ Mill rates are calculated by directing the Alaska's local governments. governing body to determine the budget requirements and identifying all revenue sources. Alaska Conference of Mayors After the budget amount is reduced by subtracting revenue sources, the residual is the amount ACoM is the parent organization of the Alaska Mu- required to be raised by the property tax.That nicipal League. The ACoM and AML work together amount is divided by the total assessed value and to form a municipal consensus on statewide and the result is identified as a “mill rate”. A “mill” is federal issues facing Alaskan local governments. 1/1000 of a dollar, so the mill rate simply states the amount of tax to be charged per $1,000 of The purpose of the Alaska Conference of Mayors assessed value.
    [Show full text]
  • Council-Manager Form of Government
    OVERVIEW OF CITY ORGANIZATION COUNCIL-MANAGER FORM OF GOVERNMENT Dallas’ government has changed and grown - from a mayor and six aldermen, to a commission with a mayor and four commissioners elected at-large, to the present council-manager system that has been in place since 1931. Originally, the council was composed of nine members and the mayor, who was elected by council vote. In 1951, the eight council members and mayor were all elected at- large. The structure changed again in 1968 to 10 council members and the mayor, who were all elected at-large, but eight council members represented specific districts. Later, in 1979, eight council members were elected from single-member districts with two council members and the mayor elected at-large. Our current system began in 1991 with 14 council members elected from single-member districts and a mayor elected at-large. The mayor is elected for four years, and council members are elected for two-year terms. Council members can serve up to four consecutive two-year terms. A mayor’s term is limited to two consecutive four-year terms. Council-manager government combines citizen input-through elected council members- with the professional training and experience of a city manager. The City’s organization under this plan is similar to that of a corporation. The mayor and city council serve as the equivalent of a board of directors. They set the public agenda, adopt policy and laws and appoint the city manager, city auditor, city attorney, and city secretary. In Dallas, the manager oversees City operations with an executive team of assistant city managers, each responsible for various departments.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital City Downtown Community Revitalization Levy – Revised Boundary and Revenue Forecasts
    6. 2. That Mayor S. Mandel, on behalf of Capital City City Council, make an application to 2 the Provincial Government Downtown requesting designation of the Capital City Downtown Community Community Revitalization Levy in a regulation. Revitalization Levy Report Revised Boundary and Revenue Forecasts On October 17, 2012, Administration provided a Downtown Arena Update to City Council that included information Recommendations: clarifying the application of a Community Revitalization Levy to fund specific City- 1. That the revised proposed boundary led Catalyst Projects, including the of the Capital City Downtown arena and related infrastructure. Community Revitalization Levy area as shown in Attachment 1 of the Administration indicated that it was not March 5, 2013, Sustainable the intent to dedicate any increase in Development report 2013SHE012, municipal and education property tax be approved. revenue that would accrue naturally 2. That Mayor S. Mandel, on behalf of through the appreciation of already City Council, send a revised existing fully developed property to pay application to the Provincial for Catalyst projects. The presentation Government requesting designation pointed out that the increase in revenue of the Capital City Downtown that is generated by the inflationary Community Revitalization Levy by appreciation of existing properties is way of regulation. essential to the City’s ability to continue to deliver programs and services to the Report Summary entire City. This report provides an update on progress towards completion of the Administration has been engaged in Capital City Downtown Community discussions with the Province about the Revitalization Levy and provides proposed Capital City Downtown direction on the next steps.
    [Show full text]
  • M E M O R a N D
    M EMORANDUM To: City Council; City Manager From: Mary A. Winters, City Attorney; Elizabeth Oshel, Associate City Attorney Re: Drawing Voting Districts Date: June 6, 2017 QUESTION What are the legal requirements for drawing voting districts in the city of Bend? ANSWER The City is bound by the U.S. Constitution, federal Voting Rights Act, and Oregon law in determining how to draw any wards or districts for election of city councilors. Cities may set their own rules for electing their city councils, and drawing districts, because Art. XI, § 2 of the Oregon constitution gives the legal voters of every city power to enact and adopt their own charters, through the home rule provisions of the Oregon Constitution. The City must follow the Oregon Secretary of State’s directive in creating or redrawing voting districts. Traditional principles of districting such as equal population, compactness, and contiguity should be the primary considerations. The racial composition of districts should be considered only if necessary to comply with the Voting Rights Act. 1. Principles of Districting and Oregon State Law Traditional districting principles should be used to draw voting districts. First, districts must be drawn with the goal of equal population. An equal population goal “is a background rule” underlying all other considerations in drawing electoral maps. ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE Page | 1 Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama, __ US __, 125 SCt 1257, 1271 (2015). In addition to equal population, traditional principles of districting include: Compactness, contiguity, respect for political subdivisions or communities defined by actual shared interests, incumbency protection, and political affiliation.
    [Show full text]
  • So You Want to Be an Elected Official
    So you want to be an elected official... Practical information for people running for office in Washington’s cities and towns Introduction Why are you running for election to a local office? This is a question that every candidate will be asked – and a question that every candidate must carefully consider. Most often, people run for office because they are deeply committed to their city or town and want to influence the community’s direction. At times, people run because they are passionate about a single issue or problem. A single controversy – such as a land use or zoning decision – could dominate an entire election campaign. But once the election is over, things change. Candidates who have won an election based on their position on a single issue soon discover that they are responsible for a much broader array of challenges. The platform they ran on may not even be on the council’s agenda. Getting it placed there will only be possible if they are willing and able to work cooperatively with other members of the council, many of whom will have their own issues to champion. In order to be effective, elected officials must work as part of a team to establish a shared vision for the future, develop goals and plans that make that future possible, and work with their colleagues and constituents to enact the local policies and laws that will ultimately lead to accomplishment. Holding a public office is an act of service to the public – that is, service to all the residents of a city or town, not just those who share your views or those who voted for you.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter and Related Laws
    CHARTER AND RELATED LAWS PART A - CHARTER LAWS CHARTER OF THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA ARTICLE 5. - THE COUNCIL Section 5.01. - Council membership, residence areas and districts. The council shall consist of 19 members and there shall be 14 council districts and 5 at-large residence areas. Each council district shall elect one council member. The council districts are described in appendix 1 to this charter. Five council members shall be elected at large. One at- large council member shall reside in each at-large residence area. The initial at-large residence areas are described in Appendix 1-A to this charter. (Ord. 91-1356-600, § 1; Laws of Fla., Ch. 92-341, § 1; Ord. 92-1982- 1455, § 2) Section 5.02. - Redistricting of council districts and residence areas. (a) Within 8 months after publication of each official federal census of the City of Jacksonville (Duval County), the council shall redistrict the 14 council districts and 5 at-large residence areas so that all districts and at-large residence areas are as nearly equal in population and are arranged in a logical and compact geographic pattern to the extent possible. If the council shall be unable to complete the redistricting of the council districts within 8 months after the official publication of the census, the general counsel shall petition the circuit court for the fourth judicial circuit to make such redistricting. Any redistricting of the council districts or at-large residence areas made pursuant to this section shall not affect any term of office in existence at the date of such redistricting, but shall be applicable beginning with the next succeeding general consolidated government election which occurs at least 9 months after the effective date of the redistricting.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Budget Process
    CAPITAL BUDGET PROCESS Capital Improvements Program The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is a six-year planning document for future capital projects throughout the city. The CIP does not authorize spending, but rather is a resolution passed by City Council. Capital Improvements Budget The Capital Improvements Budget (CIB) serves as the basis for all budgeting and spending related to capital projects throughout the city for the current year. The CIB is a one-year budget that is authorized by an ordinance passed by City Council. The CIB is also included as the first year within the six-year CIP. Both the CIB and CIP provide a breakdown of the various capital projects by department and by source of funding. To be eligible for capital improvements funding (i.e. from the issuance of debt), a capital project must result in the acquisition with a useful life of at least five years and be considered non- operational in nature. The asset should have a cost of $5,000 or more. In addition to acquisition of assets, capital funding can be used for projects that will improve an existing asset or that which will extend the useful life of an asset. Some examples of capital improvements projects include, but are not limited to, the purchase of major equipment, improvements to street lighting, street and highway improvements, land acquisition, recreational trail improvements, facility improvements, building construction, and improvements the various public utilities systems throughout the city. Capital Budget Preparation During July, the Department of Finance and Management distributes instructions to each department to begin the process of compiling the CIB and CIP.
    [Show full text]
  • Limitations of Home Rule Charter Authority for Parishes and Municipalities
    LIMITATIONS OF HOME RULE CHARTER AUTHORITY FOR PARISHES AND MUNICIPALITIES WHITE PAPER – JULY 2020 NTRODUCTION I The Louisiana Constitution grants to Local Political Subdivisions authority to exercise additional local control through the adoption and use of home rule charters. This authority, although seemingly broad, is not without limitations. This document discusses some of the limitations placed on the otherwise broad local control given to local governing authorities operating under a home rule charter form of government. I. Background The current Louisiana State Constitution came into effect on January 1, 1975. One primary focus of this new Constitution was to provide additional local control and autonomy to local governing authorities. Lafourche Parish Council v. Autin, 648 So.2d 343 (La. 1994). The Constitution, in addressing home rule charter forms of government, recognizes two groups; Home Rule Charter Governments existing at the time of the adoption of the 1974 Constitution and those authorized to be created subsequent to the Constitution’s adoption. A home rule charter provides for the organization and assignment of powers and duties for the officials of the local governing authority. This organization and distribution of powers may in some cases differ greatly from those of Lawrason Act municipalities or traditional police jury forms of parish government. The charter is adopted by the voters of the local political subdivision and generally may only be amended or repealed by a subsequent vote of the people. Article VI, §6 of the Louisiana Constitution provides that the Legislature shall not enact laws which modify or address the specific organization or distribution of powers in a local political subdivision operating under a home rule charter.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Make a Difference at a Planning Commission Or City Council Hearing
    How to Make a Difference at a Planning Commission or City Council Hearing by Amanda Fritz, Portland Planning Commission member 1996 - 2003 1. Provide information, in plenty of time and in useful formats. 2. Be polite and respectful, both to the decision-makers and to any opponents. 3. Plan your testimony, and use your time wisely. 4. Say what you want the decision-makers to do, clearly and repeatedly, and why. 5. Know the rules, and quote them. 6. The Rule of Three - Tell them, tell them again, tell them what you told them. 7. Organize diverse participation with more than a single constituency. 8. Use Meeting Mechanics to your advantage. 9. Use Personal Contacts to your advantage. 10. Be gracious in victory and defeat - use either to prepare for Next Time. ****************************************************************************** * How to Make a Difference at a Planning Commission or City Council Hearing 1. Provide information, in plenty of time and in useful formats. Often, decision-makers don't know as much about the issue as you do. They have to vote on multiple issues, week after week. You care most about one item on their agenda, and can research it in far greater detail than they can. Your goal is to convince them your position has more support (factually and/or in citizen popularity) than the other side. • Present your position in several formats. Different people have different ways of processing information. So provide a one-page overview with bullets, for those who don't read much, followed by several pages with all the details you feel are important, for those who like to consider all the facts.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond City Council Agenda
    Community Services Building 440 Civic Center Plaza Richmond, CA 94804 AGENDA Tuesday, September 28, 2021 6:30 p.m. Link to City Council Agendas/Packets http://sireweb.ci.richmond.ca.us/sirepub/meet.aspx Register to receive notification of new agendas, etc. http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/list.aspx Mayor Vice Mayor Thomas K. Butt Demnlus Johnson III Councilmembers Nathaniel Bates Claudia Jimenez Eduardo Martinez Gayle McLaughlin Melvin Willis ALL CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS WILL PARTICIPATE VIA TELECONFERENCE Housing Authority Tenant Commissioners Jaycine Scott Vacant CORONAVIRUS DISEASE (COVID-19) ADVISORY Due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, Contra Costa County and Governor Gavin Tuesday, September 28, 2021 Newsom have issued multiple orders requiring sheltering in place, social distancing, and reduction of person-to-person contact. Accordingly, Governor Gavin Newsom has issued executive orders that allow cities to hold public meetings via teleconferencing. Both https://www.coronavirus.cchealth.org/ and http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/3914/Richmond- Coronavirus-Info provide updated coronavirus information. DUE TO THE SHELTER IN PLACE ORDERS, attendance at the City of Richmond City Council meeting will be limited to Council members, essential City of Richmond staff, and members of the news media. Public comment will be confined to items appearing on the agenda and will be limited to the methods provided below. Consistent with Executive Orders N-29-20 and N-08-21 this meeting will utilize teleconferencing only. The following provides information on how the public can participate in this meeting. How to watch the meeting from home: 1. KCRT – Comcast Channel 28 or AT&T Uverse Channel 99 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Borough Government
    The Pennsylvania State Association of Boroughs Junior Council Person Program: Guide to Borough Government Thank you for committing to serve your borough through the Pennsylvania State Association of Boroughs Junior Council Person (JCP) Program. From its inception, the JCP program has aimed to provide high school juniors and seniors across the Commonwealth an opportunity to learn about and actively participate in borough government. By becoming a junior council person you have taken a step to strengthen your community and become a leader for future generations of public service minded individuals. The following pages are designed to assist you during your term on borough council. This guide will explain, as simply as possible, the structure and nature of local government in Pennsylvania. It will give you details on the qualifications to become a borough councilperson and the powers granted once a citizen is elected to the position. It will explain to you how meetings are conducted, why it is important to be accountable and transparent in your actions, and the various responsibilities placed on borough councils throughout the state. It will give you information on the fiscal powers of borough council and will explain to you the importance of providing municipal services to the residents of your community. We encourage you to ask your borough officials questions throughout the year and to dig deeper into important community issues. We have also included “Questions to Consider” and “Challenges” at the end of each section. These questions and challenges are designed to stimulate your thinking and encourage you to delve deeper into the topic areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Candidate Questionnaire
    2021 Candidate Questionnaire General Questions for City Council, Mayor, Public Advocate, Comptroller, and Borough President: 1. How would you use this position to improve policing in New York? Do you support cutting NYPD funding in order to reallocate funds towards needed services and social programs? Where would you reallocate the funds, if so? What concrete policies would you advocate for to improve policing in NY? 2. How would you go about creating more affordable housing in New York? What about permanent housing for New York’s houseless population? Where would you put it? How would you make sure it’s actually affordable and sustainable? Would you ever support upzoning in order to create it? Will you accept money from real estate interests? Please be specific on your proposals. 3. Do you support taxing the wealthy? What specific tax policy changes would you support in New York State and New York City to increase State and City revenue? How will you, at the same time, restore NYC's economic health, employment, tax base, and small businesses, both short- term and long? 4. How should we desegregate our schools? Do you support eliminating the SHSAT? Do you support admissions screens? What concrete changes would you make to our public school system? 5. What is the path forward on corrections reform? Do you support closing Rikers? Do you support constructing new, borough-based jails? In all boroughs or just some of them? Do you support bail reform? Did you support the recent partial roll back of bail reform? 6. How can New York lead on climate change? Are there any green energy projects we can pursue? Do you support any of the existing pipeline proposals? How can we leverage our financial and economic power to encourage other jurisdictions to be better on the climate? 7.
    [Show full text]