Developing a Regional Economy in the Post Jefferson’S Embargo Ohio Valley
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
VALLEY OF INDUSTRY: DEVELOPING A REGIONAL ECONOMY IN THE POST JEFFERSON’S EMBARGO OHIO VALLEY _______________________________________ A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy _____________________________________________________ by WILLIAM G. LEWIS Dr. Jeffrey L. Pasley, Dissertation Supervisor JULY 2014 © Copyright by William G. Lewis 2014 All Rights Reserved The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled VALLEY OF INDUSTRY: DEVELOPING A REGIONAL ECONOMY IN THE POST JEFFERSON’S EMBARGO OHIO VALLEY presented by William G. Lewis, a candidate for the degree of doctor of philosophy, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor Jeffrey L. Pasley Professor LeeAnn Whites Professor Robert Smale Professor Jerritt Frank Professor Michael A. Urban To my parents, George and Mandy Lewis. You never gave up on me and none of my achievements would have been possible without your support. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express the deepest appreciation to my committee chair and advisor, Jeffrey L. Pasley of the University of Missouri who continually believed in me and my work. He took a collection of abstract ideas and helped turn them into the foundation of this dissertation. I also owe a debt of gratitude to my advisor at Western Kentucky University, Andrew McMichael, who taught me how to be a historian. Without his guidance during my undergraduate career this dissertation would not have been possible. I would like to thank my committee members LeeAnn Whites, Robert Smale, Jerritt Frank and Michael A. Urban for donating their time and effort to this project. In particular, I would like to thank LeeAnn Whites for taking a special interest in me and my work. Over the course of the past six years, she fostered considerable growth in my analytical writing skills. Although too numerous to list individually, I would be remiss not to thank the various faculty, staff and fellow graduate students at the University of Missouri and Western Kentucky University who aided and advanced my academic journey which culminated in the completion of this dissertation. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………….ii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS……………………………………………………………..iv INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………….......1 CHAPTER 1. THE OHIO VALLEY AND THE ATLANTIC WORLD ......................................28 2. PITTSBURGH……………………………………………………………………79 3. MARIETTA ..........................................................................................................169 4. LOUISVILLE .......................................................................................................255 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................321 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................332 VITA ................................................................................................................................362 iii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Tables and Charts Figure Page 1A. Total Value of U.S. Exports, 1806-1809…………………………………………7 1B. Value of Selected U.S. Exports, 1806-1809……………………………………....7 2. Cotton Mills Erected in New England, 1800-1829……………………………….9 3. Per Capita Consumption of Imported Goods, 1790-1850………………………..9 4. Manufacturing as a % of Total Employment, 1810-1870……………………….10 Maps Figure Page 5. The Northwest Frontier, 1789-1800…………………………………………….30 6. The West, 1783-1789…………………………………………………………...31 iv INTRODUCTION During the early morning hours of May 28, 1754, a company of men from the Virginia Militia under the command of a young lieutenant colonel named George Washington marched through the darkness, rain, and thick brush towards a French encampment near present day Uniontown, Pennsylvania. Sometime near daybreak, accompanied by a small number of Mingo warriors led by the Half-King Tanaghrisson, the company approached their target. Washington expected to find a large French force capable of forcing the British from the Ohio Valley. Instead, Washington found a detachment of French soldiers much smaller than he had anticipated and in a general state of unpreparedness not commensurate with a force ready to strike. As the French soldiers emerged groggy and half asleep from their bark lean-tos, they discovered the British and Indian presence and went for their weapons. Washington ordered his troops to fire and finding themselves outnumbered and outgunned, the Frenchmen soon surrendered. As the commander of the French troops, Joseph Coulon de Villiers de Jumonville, lay bleeding and pleading for Washington to believe that he had not planned to attack but merely warn the Englishmen to leave the Ohio Valley, the Mingo Half-King Tanaghrisson approached the fallen Frenchmen. He looked down upon Jumonville and proclaimed “Thou art not dead, my father,” then proceeded to shatter his cranium with a hatchet and wash his hands with the Frenchmen’s brains. This affair is often called the Battle of Jumonville and it marked the start of the French and Indian War.1 1 George Washington, The Diaries of George Washington, Vol. I, 1748-1765, ed. Donald Jackson (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1976), 194-196; John Shaw, “Affidavit of Fred Shaw,” in Colonial Records of South Carolina: Documents Relating to Indian Affairs, 1754-1765, ed. William L. The French and Indian War, which evolved into a worldwide conflict known as the Seven Year’s War, was at its core a battle for the resources of the Ohio Valley. Both the British and the French wanted what nature had placed within the valley and were prepared to kill in order to get it. The preceding story was dramatic and brutal and provides an entry point to discuss the value European powers placed on gaining and maintaining control of the Ohio Valley and its resources. But, it did not mark the beginning or the end of the story. In reality the battle for the resources of the Ohio Valley was actually more subtle than a volley of musket fire against a detachment of unsuspecting French soldiers or a cranium smashing swing of a hatchet by a renegade Mingo Warrior. It is instead a story of economic control maintained through the extraction and manufacture of natural resources such as agricultural produce, timber, mineral deposits and animal skins and furs that went beyond guns and hatchets and even colonial control. The whole story can be found in examination of a colonial economy that existed even after colonial rule ended. The powers of Europe coveted control of the Ohio Valley at first because of the fur trade and later because of its agricultural produce and mineral deposits. Therefore, the battle for the resources of the Ohio Valley started as a quest for fur. According to historian Eric Jay Dolin, ‘the fur trade determined the course of empire” as North America became a battleground where European powers waged war for the right to kill millions of animals for their fur. By the mid-eighteenth century, the Ohio Valley had become the main field of battle for North American fur and the French and British constituted the primary combatants. Both nations viewed sovereignty over the Ohio McDowell Jr. (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1970), 4-5; Fred Anderson, Crucible of War: The Seven Years’ War and the Fate of Empire in British North America (New York: Vintage Books, 2000), 5-7. 2 Valley and its natural resources as vital to maintaining control of their North American empires.2 The struggle for the natural resources of the Ohio Valley fits into the mercantilist and imperialist world views of Britain and France in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. They wanted to establish colonies and extract their natural resources for the home economy. Resources would be taken from the edge or fringes of its empire to enhance the wealth and power of its center. Historian Eric Hindraker calls this relationship “empires of commerce.” In a similar vein, historians John J. McCusker and Russell Menard have posited that the relationship between mother country and colony blurred economic boundaries and created a situation where the colonies’ economic identity was nearly inseparable from that of the colonizer. The work of McCusker and Menard builds upon that of nineteenth century English philosopher and political economist John Stuart Mill who defined colonies as being “outlying agricultural or manufacturing establishments belonging to a larger community” and argued that trade between colony and mother country “is hardly to be considered as external trade, but more resembles the traffic between town and country.” Colonial America and more importantly to this study the Ohio Valley, was as a possession of larger and more powerful nations and devoid of its own economic identity. The economic fate of the Ohio Valley would be determined by whatever nation won the battle over its resources.3 2 Eric Jay Dolan, Fur, Fortune and Empire: The Epic History of the Fur Trade in America (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2010), XV-XVII and 109-112. 3 Eric Hinderaker, Elusive Empires: Constructing Colonialism in the Ohio Valley, 1673-1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 1-2; John J. McCusker & Russell R. Menard, The Economy of British North America, 1607-1789 (Chapel