DOCSLIB.ORG

Psychoanalysis and Politics Juliet Mitchell Then and Now

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Psychoanalysis and Politics Juliet Mitchell Then and Now Psychoanalysis and politics Juliet Mitchell then and now Lynne Segal ʻWell, Iʼll think about women thenʼ, Juliet Mitchell on, where that entrenchment could be undermined proposed in 1963, suggesting a topic to research as and eroded in some way.ʼ4 Today, it is Mitchell herself she sat, the lone woman, on the editorial board of New who worries that psychoanalysis, and in particular Left Review – alongside her husband, Perry Anderson, feminismʼs embrace of it, may have served to displace the freshly minted editor of the journal. The inevitable politics. ʻDoes [psychoanalysisʼs] self-described, non- response greeted Mitchellʼs startling proposal in such political discourse draw all potentially radical use of circles at that time: ʻthere was silenceʼ.1 A decade later it into the apolitical?ʼ, she recently queried. Or con- and Mitchellʼs next move seemed just as eccentric, at versely, and perhaps more surprisingly, she wonders: least to many of the women who had by then raced ʻdoes the recurrent demise of feminism … turn a in to erase that earlier embarrassed silence on the radical investigatory mode which is psychoanalysis ʻsecondʼ sex once and for all – during the passion- into an apolitical discourse?ʼ5 Good questions. Her ate early years of Womenʼs Liberation. She turned, worries are just the ones we need to address if we increasingly, towards psychoanalysis for assistance want to ponder the conjunction of psychoanalysis and with her political task. The challenge, obviously, was feminism over the last three decades. The first ques- not just the serene sovereignty of male domination, tion, at least, expresses some of my own misgivings. sexism and misogyny, which had reigned over every Yet, oddly, while regularly fielding the right ques- domain in the 1960s, but the infeasibility of disclosing tions, Mitchellʼs replies are equivocal and puzzling. its elemental presence using the prevailing political Her theoretical and professional engagement in languages of the Left: of class, colonialism, or impe- psychoanalysis, although critical and creative, does rial aggression. not itself direct us to any particular social, let alone Juliet Mitchell would appear to be the ideal author- historical, circumstances which she seeks either to ity to turn to if one wants to discuss the fraught issue erode, or only to change, in order to further her of psychoanalysis and politics. This is not only because feminist goal of increasing the cultural power, agency her book Psychoanalysis and Feminism was seminal and personal happiness of women. On the contrary, for so many women radicals in the 1970s, busy attend- she has consistently dismissed ʻthe sociologizing of ing their Marx and Freud reading groups.2 It is also psychoanalysisʼ by theorists like Nancy Chodorow because she has consistently insisted that she remains and Jessica Benjamin, who stress the impact of the steadfastly attached to being political – even in these particularities of culture – especially the shifting very different times, when many have discarded their dynamics of parenting – in the psychological domain.6 former ideals as yesterdayʼs folly. Psychoanalysis and Mitchellʼs own resolute, now less than fashionable, Feminism, she has recalled, ʻwas asking if we could universalizing of psychoanalytic explanations of the use psychoanalysis to bring feminism into the socialist structural/symbolic origins of sexual difference seem project. That project has to take off from there.ʼ3 Or, as more symptomatic of what many have seen as the she put it elsewhere: ʻThe question for me in that book obstinacy of a psychoanalysis which works to fix or was that if patriarchy is so entrenched, there must be naturalize, rather than to diminish, coercive sexual historical circumstances which a politics could work and gender binaries. Psychoanalytic insights, in my 12 Radical Philosophy 103 (September/October 2000) view, can be used – often must be used – to help us Gender and Sexuality.9 They all emphasize that sexed grasp aspects of the political moment and, especially, identity is never internalized as a single entity (posi- the belligerence and dread so often greeting change tively or a negatively), but operates subjectively within in the personal and sexual arena. Yet, as Freudʼs an array of always conflictual mental representations most compelling feminist, Foucauldian and newly born and self-perceptions. These are sedimented out of Deleuzean critics all insist, its traditional dilemma the unique identifications each child makes with its is that in practice psychoanalysis has routinely been own parents, siblings and significant others, however deployed, and often still serves, to reinforce a coercive much these interactions are always already permeated normalizing of heterosexual, reproductive sexuality with the polarizing effects of symbolic phallocentrism and identity, rather than calling them into question. and the still prevailing – though increasingly diverse This is most apparent in the arena where it is routinely and disputed – social and familial patterns of male invoked, in sexual and gender politics, as I think we dominance. can see in the work of Juliet Mitchell. A somewhat different account, although not dis- similar in its consequences for the psychic formation Sexual binarism or gender ambiguity? of sexual difference, comes from those influenced by In talks and interviews delivered in the 1990s, Mitchell the French psychoanalyst Jean Laplanche (promoted suggests that the depoliticizing of both feminism and most comprehensively in Britain by John Fletcher).10 psychoanalysis in recent decades has something to do Laplanche explains the inevitable installation of the with the increasing academic interest in sexuality and unconscious in the child as not so much the effect representation at the expense of kinship, ideology and of the childʼs identifications as, from the outside, the the reproduction of society around sexual difference. implantation of an always unique bundle of enigmatic The former, she suggests, attempts to valorize mother- signifiers or untranslatable messages coming from the hood and the pre-Oedipal as an alternative female and unconscious desires of the mother, or other significant feminine sphere. In contrast, she argues, it is only adults – via what he terms ʻseductionʼ. attention to kinship and ideology which can explain Either way, it can be argued that while the child how and why women and men are positioned differ- is imbued with unconscious sexual desires through its ently in ʻpatriarchalʼ kinship structures.7 Despite her interactions with the seductive and desired attention clinical training in psychoanalytic object-relations and and ministration of adult others, there is no primordial the Independent School, which followed her theoreti- sexual binarism in the unconscious. Indeed, this is cal schooling in Freud and Lacan, Mitchell seems to precisely why gendered and sexual identifications are remain, by and large, faithful to the claim she made so confusing, and so chronically in danger of col- in the early 1980s, following Lacan (and along with lapsing under the weight of their own contradictions. Jacqueline Rose), that ʻthe strengthʼ which psycho- From this perspective, the psychoanalytic message analysis brings to feminism resides in its claim that the and goal of treatment is not so much the achieve- category ʻwomenʼ is an empty one: women are ʻdefined ment of an appropriate gendered or sexual identity, exactly as – and only as – their difference from menʼ. as the ability ʻto tolerate the ambiguity and insta- There is no positive content to be given to women, bility of gender categoriesʼ.11 Here, the acceptance or to femininity. Only from here, Mitchell suggested of gender ambiguity and instability signals mental then, can we begin to think psychoanalytically, can health. These more recent psychoanalytic trajectories we begin to see ʻhow gender is constructed and how rethinking gender and sexual difference often express sexual differences are livedʼ.8 the Foucauldian and Derridean influences authorizing Mitchell is well aware that any such emphasis on queer theoryʼs account of the inevitable instability and structural determinants, like kinship, and the ineluct- fluidity of identities and desire, with Judith Butler and able hold of the classic Oedipal narrative, is pre- Eve Sedgwick still its reigning – if at times reluctant cisely not the direction taken by those – non-Lacanian – theoreticians.12 – feminist clinicians who have been most engaged in Mitchell obviously knows, as well as Freud, Lacan critically using psychoanalysis as a tool for reworking or any other reflective clinician, that ʻmasculinityʼ notions of gender. I am thinking, in particular, of the and ʻfemininityʼ have no clear or certain content. New York analysts (not one of whom is mentioned She is all too aware of what the Lacanian Mous- in Mitchellʼs latest book) such as Jessica Benjamin, tafa Safouan sums up as ʻsimply the state of affairs Muriel Dimen, Virginia Goldner and Arlene Harris, confirmed by all analysisʼ: ʻthat the energy with which who in 1996 helped found the journal Gender and the subject declares himself [sic] man or woman is Psychoanalysis, relaunched this year as Studies in proportional to that with which the reverse is stated in Radical Philosophy 103 (September/October 2000) 13 the unconscious.ʼ13 Indeed, Mitchell would add, that is of infancy, is the man or woman who has been unable the whole point of psychoanalysis: to understand how to find his or her place within a future
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Syllabus PT 154 Comparative Psychoanalysis T. Morgan Fall 2018
    Syllabus PT 154 Comparative Psychoanalysis T. Morgan Fall 2018 Wed. 3:30-5:30 CMPS: 30 Clock Hours NYGSP: 2 Credits Course Description This semester’s work will familiarize candidates with the motifs, idioms and preoccupations of a not- exhaustive list of schools of psychoanalysis as well as field influencers who fall between the theoretical cracks. We will aim to traverse a cross-section of meta-psychologies, diverse understandings of the human subject, unique concepts of cure, and (to the degree that ways of working are made apparent), various clinical techniques. Modern candidates will have the opportunity to prepare to interact with the ideas of many psychoanalytic tribes. Toward that end we will whet our appetites for Kleinian, Relational, Contemporary Freudian, Lacanian, Intersubjective, Feminist, and Interpersonal points of view. Objectives The candidate will be able to: • think historically about the genesis of transformations and developments in the field of psychoanalysis; • identify themes germane to discrete schools of psychoanalytic thought; and • employ psychoanalytic terminology such as “repression, conflict, dissociation, co-construction, thirdness, drive derivatives, internalized objects, regression, self-states, symbolization, “not-me”, trauma, wish, projective identification, introject, adaptation, ego defense, enigmatic messages, object a, attacks on linking, and more. Requirements *Reading requirements will, on average, tally about 50 pages a week. Pay attention to feelings aroused by the readings. *Come to class prepared to share what you loved and hated about the readings. *Submit, every other class, a 2-3 page, double-spaced written exploration of the last two week’s readings. Find what interests you and elaborate upon it. Email it to the instructor at [email protected] by Sunday before 6 pm the class before it is due if you want written commentary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apres-Coup, Apres Coup: Concerning Jean Laplanche Problématiques VI
    The Apres-Coup, Apres Coup: Concerning Jean Laplanche Problématiques VI. L’Après-Coup1 Sergio Benvenuto Italian Council for Scientific Research Abstract Here the author examines the question of après-coup (afterwardsness) in psychoanalysis, commenting in particular on Jean Laplanche’s book, Après-Coup. The author appreciates Laplanche’s determination to avoid either a positivist interpretation of après-coup (as a “delay-action bomb”, as simply a delayed psychic effect) or an hermeneutic interpretation that makes of it a post-factum re-signification of past events. Yet at the same time, the author shows that Laplanche’s solution— which assumes an initial trauma to the subject, who must “translate” an ambiguous and enigmatic message originating from an adult other—ends up being, in effect, a clever combination of the two approaches, positivist and hermeneutic, that Laplanche was trying to avoid. Laplanche advances a much too linear theory, placing “the other” (that is, the desire of the adult) at the beginning of the process, while Lacan’s approach to après-coup opens up far more complex and disturbing perspectives for psychoanalysis. The author, having shown the limitations of Laplanche’s result (“the primacy of the other”), proposes his own interpretation of après-coup, wherein it would connect, in a unique way, the cause and the sense of the psychic world: a subsequent event in some way makes the sense of a preceding event to function as the cause of later psychic phenomena or symptoms. Introduction In time, later, we realize that the question of nachträglich – après-coup in French – is one of the central knots of psychoanalysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Ja a LAPLANCHE
    APAXXX10.1177/0003065116675878Book EssayLaplanche 675878research-article2016 j a P a Deborah L. Browning 64/5 LAPLANCHE: FROM THE ENIGMATIC MESSAGE OF THE OTHER TO THE UNCONSCIOUS ALTERITY WITHIN THE TEMPTATION OF BIOLOGY: FREUD’S THEORIES OF SEXUALITY. By Jean Laplanche. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. New York: The Unconscious in Translation, 2015, xii + 140 pp., $73.50 hardcover, $39.50 paperback. BETWEEN SEDUCTION AND INSPIRATION: MAN. By Jean Laplanche. Translated and with an introduction by Jeffrey Mehlman. New York: The Unconscious in Translation, 2015, xxii + 304 pp., $68.50 hardcover, $48.50 paperback. DOI: 10.1177/0003065116675878 These two books, The Temptation of Biology: Freud’s Theories of Sexuality (hereafter, Temptation) and Between Seduction and Inspiration: Man (hereafter, Seduction), by the French psychoanalyst Jean Laplanche are complete English translations, compiled by Laplanche himself, of his major writings and lectures from 1992 through 1999 and published here in 2015 by the American press The Unconscious in Translation. Although Laplanche’s name is well known, linked with J.-B. Pontalis as co-author of The Language of Psycho-Analysis (1967; hereafter, Language), as well as from his Life and Death in Psychoanalysis (1970) and New Foundations for Psychoanalysis (1987), it is important to keep in mind that until his death in 2012 Laplanche was also in charge of the complete translation of the works of Freud from German into French, translating many of the papers himself. This process provided him a particularly intimate knowl- edge of certain aspects of Freud’s writing, not easily available to the exclusively anglophone reader of Strachey’s Standard Edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Homenagem a Jean Laplanche
    Ágora: Estudos em Teoria Psicanalítica ISSN: 1516-1498 [email protected] Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Brasil Dejours, Christophe; Martens, Francis Homenagem a Jean Laplanche Ágora: Estudos em Teoria Psicanalítica, vol. XV, núm. 2, julio-diciembre, 2012, pp. 345- 347 Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Disponível em: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=376534586011 Como citar este artigo Número completo Sistema de Informação Científica Mais artigos Rede de Revistas Científicas da América Latina, Caribe , Espanha e Portugal Home da revista no Redalyc Projeto acadêmico sem fins lucrativos desenvolvido no âmbito da iniciativa Acesso Aberto Homenagem HOMENAGEM A JEAN LAPLANCHE Christophe Dejours e Francis Martens Christophe Dejours Membro do Conselho Científico oi num piscar de olhos apoiado pelo destino que Jean La- da “Fundação Jean Laplanche, Novos Fplanche (21 de junho de 1924 a 6 de maio de 2012) faleceu fundamentos para a este ano em Dijon, no dia do aniversário de nascimento de Psicanálise”, Institut Freud (6 de maio de 1856). Com uma obstinação de camponês, de France. esse neto de trabalhador em vinhedos não parou de labutar Francis Martens no campo freudiano, para reencontrar aí as linhas de força, Membro do Conselho Científico as escapadas por pouco, a radical subversão, que a abundância da “Fundação Jean de Freud, a babel em que resultou sua herança e o fato de ter Laplanche, Novos sido resgatado pela moda, contribuíram para obscurecer tanto fundamentos para a Psicanálise”, Institut quanto para banalizar. de France. Formado em Beaune, antigo aluno da Escola Normal Superior, doutor em filosofia, com formação complementar Tradução Pedro Henrique em Harvard (onde encontrou o psicanalista Rudolph Löwens- Bernardes Rondon tein), esse mestre assistente na Sorbonne, depois professor em Paris VII, era também interno dos hospitais psiquiátricos da região do Sena.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conversation with Juliet Mitchell
    A Conversation with Juliet Mitchell TAMAR GARB and MIGNON NIXON Mignon Nixon: The occasion for this conversation is the publication of Siblings: Sex and Violence (2003), which comes fast on the heels of your groundbreaking study of hysteria, Mad Men and Medusas: Reclaiming Hysteria and the Effects of Sibling Relations on the Human Condition in 2000. In both books you argue that psychoanalysis is trapped in a vertical paradigm that privileges inter- generational relations—parents and children—at the expense of lateral, intragenerational relationships which find their origin in siblings. What galva- nized your thinking about siblings? And how has this turn to the horizontal, lateral dimension of experience affected your thinking about feminism? Juliet Mitchell: Freud says the Oedipus complex opens out onto a social family com- plex. At no point do I want to say that there is not a crucial intergenerational relationship. Of course there is. This is not an attempt to displace that in any sense. It is an attempt to say that at certain points there is an interaction between the intergenerational and the lateral. This idea came from my clini- cal work as a psychoanalyst, from being stuck while trying to understand something about hysteria. It also came very specifically through the question of the male hysteric. But you ask about feminism, so perhaps I should back- track and talk about my relationship to feminism. Nixon: In 1974, you published Psychoanalysis and Feminism, the first major study to consider second-wave feminism and psychoanalysis together. Maybe you could start by telling us what brought you to write that book.
    [Show full text]
  • GOV 1029 Feminist Political Thought
    GOV 1029 Feminist Political Thought Tuesday, Thursday 12-1.15 Fall Semester 2018 Professor Katrina Forrester Office Hours: Tuesday, Thursday 2-3 Office: CGIS K437 E-mail: [email protected] Teaching Fellow: Leah Downey E-mail: [email protected] Course Description: What is feminism? What is patriarchy? What and who is a woman? How does gender relate to sexuality, and to class and race? Should housework be waged, should sex be for sale, and should feminists trust the state? This course is an introduction to feminist political thought since the mid-twentieth century. It introduces students to classic texts of late twentieth-century feminism, explores the key arguments that have preoccupied radical, socialist, liberal, Black, postcolonial and queer feminists, examines how these arguments have changed over time, and asks how debates about equality, work, and identity matter today. We will proceed chronologically, reading texts mostly written during feminism’s so-called ‘second wave’, by a range of influential thinkers including Simone de Beauvoir, Shulamith Firestone, bell hooks and Catharine MacKinnon. We will examine how feminists theorized patriarchy, capitalism, labor, property and the state; the relationship of claims of sex, gender, race, and class; the development of contemporary ideas about sexuality, identity, and gender; and how and whether these ideas change how fundamental problems in political theory are understood. 1 Course Requirements: Participation (25%) includes (a) active participation in discussion (15%); and (b) weekly responses: each week you will send 2-3 brief questions/ comments about the reading to your TF by 5pm the day before section (10%) Paper 1 (25%) 5-6 pages due October 18 4pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Psychoanalysis
    RADICAL PSYCHOANALYSIS Only by the method of free-association could Sigmund Freud have demonstrated how human consciousness is formed by the repression of thoughts and feelings that we consider dangerous. Yet today most therapists ignore this truth about our psychic life. This book offers a critique of the many brands of contemporary psychoanalysis and psychotherapy that have forgotten Freud’s revolutionary discovery. Barnaby B. Barratt offers a fresh and compelling vision of the structure and function of the human psyche, building on the pioneering work of theorists such as André Green and Jean Laplanche, as well as contemporary deconstruction, feminism, and liberation philosophy. He explores how “drive” or desire operates dynamically between our biological body and our mental representations of ourselves, of others, and of the world we inhabit. This dynamic vision not only demonstrates how the only authentic freedom from our internal imprisonments comes through free-associative praxis, it also shows the extent to which other models of psychoanalysis (such as ego-psychology, object-relations, self-psychology, and interpersonal-relations) tend to stray disastrously from Freud’s original and revolutionary insights. This is a vision that understands the central issues that imprison our psychic lives—the way in which the reflections of consciousness are based on the repression of our innermost desires, the way in which our erotic vitality is so often repudiated, and the way in which our socialization oppressively stifles our human spirit. Radical Psychoanalysis restores to the discipline of psychoanalysis the revolutionary impetus that has so often been lost. It will be essential reading for psychoanalysts, psychoanalytic psychotherapists, mental health practitioners, as well as students and academics with an interest in the history of psychoanalysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Death and Mastery: Psychoanalytic Drive Theory and the Subject of Late Capitalism / Benjamin Y
    !"#$% #&! '#($")* &"+ !,)"-$,.&( ,& -),$,-#/ $%".)* New Directions in Critical Theory Amy Allen, General Editor New Directions in Critical Theory presents outstanding classic and contempo- rary texts in the tradition of critical social theory, broadly construed. The series aims to renew and advance the program of critical social theory, with a particular focus on theorizing contemporary struggles around gender, race, sexuality, class, and globalization and their complex interconnections. Narrating Evil: A Postmetaphysical Theory of Reflective Judgment, María Pía Lara The Politics of Our Selves: Power, Autonomy, and Gender in Contemporary Critical Theory, Amy Allen Democracy and the Political Unconscious, Noëlle McAfee The Force of the Example: Explorations in the Paradigm of Judgment, Alessandro Ferrara Horrorism: Naming Contemporary Violence, Adriana Cavarero Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World, Nancy Fraser Pathologies of Reason: On the Legacy of Critical Theory, Axel Honneth States Without Nations: Citizenship for Mortals, Jacqueline Stevens The Racial Discourses of Life Philosophy: Négritude, Vitalism, and Modernity, Donna V. Jones Democracy in What State?, Giorgio Agamben, Alain Badiou, Daniel Bensaïd, Wendy Brown, Jean-Luc Nancy, Jacques Rancière, Kristin Ross, Slavoj Žižek Politics of Culture and the Spirit of Critique: Dialogues, edited by Gabriel Rockhill and Alfredo Gomez-Muller Mute Speech: Literature, Critical Theory, and Politics, Jacques Rancière The Right to Justification: Elements of Constructivist
    [Show full text]
  • Gender, Sexuality and the Theory of Seduction
    J O H N F L E T C H E R .................................................................................................................................................. Gender, Sexuality and the Theory of Seduction o readdress the conjunction of psychoanalysis and gender one must first pose the question as to whether psychoanalysis is, or has, or can be expected to Tprovide, a theory of gender as such. For it was in something like that hope that certain forms of feminism and radical social theory turned to psycho- analysis in the 1970s. Is gender, however, a properly psychoanalytic or metapsychological category? Or, rather, does not psychoanalysis borrow the categories of masculine and feminine from the life-world of social practice and its ideologies, even at times from the theories of sociology, just as it purloins certain theoretical concepts and categories of biology and physi- ology with their accounts of the body and its functions of self-preservation? However, psychoanalysis borrows and purloins understandings of both gender and the body in order to give an account of something else: something that indeed bears on how we live subjectively our gendered and embodied lives, although this cannot make of psychoanalysis a substitute for an explanation of the social production of gender categories and gendered positions within the various fields of social practice, anymore than psycho- analysis can be a substitute for a science of the body and its developmental and self-preservative functioning. This something else is the unconscious and sexuality, the object of psychoanalysis. I want provisionally to hold apart, to separate at least analytically gender, sexuality and sexual difference, in order to interrupt the too easy assimilation ............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 2 Feminism and Psychoanalysis
    Feminist Theories UNIT 2 FEMINISM AND PSYCHOANALYSIS Anu Aneja Structure 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Objectives 2.3 Freud, Psychoanalysis and Feminism 2.3.1 Introduction to Sigmund Freud 2.3.2 Basic Concepts in Freudian Theory 2.3.3 Freud’s Theory of Infantile Sexuality and the Oedipus Complex 2.3.4 Female Sexuality in Freudian Theory 2.3.5 Feminist Detractors of Freud: Kate Millett and Nancy Chodorow 2.4 Lacan and Feminism 2.4.1 Lacan and Psychoanalysis 2.4.2 Lacanian Feminist Theorists: Juliet Mitchell and Jacqueline Rose 2.5 Let Us Sum Up 2.6 Glossary 2.7 Unit End Questions 2.8 References 2.9 Suggested Readings 2.1 INTRODUCTION In the previous block (i.e. Block 4), you have seen how feminist theorists have made significant interventions in different disciplinary areas. In Unit 3 of Block 4, we looked at feminist critiques of knowledge in the humanities, more specifically in the areas of literature, philosophy, and psychoanalysis. In this unit, you will read further about some of the contributions made by feminist theorists who have examined psychoanalytical concepts and theories and attempted to understand their relevance for women. You will also read about the ways in which they have contributed to a critique of some of the gaps and misrepresentations prevalent in these theories. The contributions of feminist theorists will be examined in relationship to the psychoanalytic theories of Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan, two major thinkers of the twentieth century whose works have provoked a rich body of diverse feminist responses and counter-theories.
    [Show full text]
  • Women: the Longest Revolution
    Juliet Mitchell Women: the Longest Revolution The situation of women is different from that of any other social group. This is because they are not one of a number of isolable units, but half a totality: the human species. Women are essential and irreplaceable; they cannot therefore be exploited in the same way as other social groups can. They are fundamental to the human condition, yet in their economic, social and political roles, they are marginal. It is precisely this combination—fundamental and marginal at one and the same time—that has been fatal to them. Within the world of men their position is comparable to that of an oppressed minority: but they also exist outside the world of men. The one state justifies the other and precludes protest. In advanced industrial society, women’s work is only marginal to the total economy. Yet it is through work that man changes natural conditions and there- by produces society. Until there is a revolution in production, the labour situation will prescribe women’s situation within the world of men. But women are offered a universe of their own: the family. Like woman herself, the family appears as a natural object, but it is actually a cultural creation. There is nothing inevitable about the form or role of the family any more than there is about the character or role of women. It is the function of ideology to present these given social types as aspects of Nature itself. Both can be exalted para- doxically, as ideals. The ‘true’ woman and the ‘true’ family are images of peace and plenty: in actuality they may both be sites of violence and despair.
    [Show full text]
  • A N Z<+Lote2svz
    a n z<+lote2svz no- BETTY FRIEDAN'S ROLE AS REFORMER IN THE WOMEN'S LIBERATION MOVEMENT, 1960-1970 Glenda F. Hodges Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of < the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY June 1980 Approved: Advisor VITA April 12, 1951...............Born - Selma, North Carolina 1972 ......................... B.A. - Virginia State College, Petersburg, Virginia 1972 - 1973 ................. Research Assistant - National Institute for Automotive Service Excellence, Washington, D.C. 1975 ......................... M.A. - Howard University, Washington, D.C. 1975 - 1977 ................. Instructor, Tuskegee Institute, Tuskegee, Alabama 1977 - 1979 ................. Assistant Director, Basic Speech Course, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Interpersonal and Public Communication Studies in Interpersonal Communication. Dr. James Wilcox Studies in Public Address. Dr. Raymond Yeager Studies in Persuasion. Dr. John Rickey Studies in Rhetoric. Dr. Donald Enholm Studies in Human Communication and Research Design. Dr. Raymond Tucker Studies in Business Management. Dr. William Hoskins Ill ABSTRACT The activities of the sixties that addressed the issue of women’s rights have been given considerable attention by historians. These activities called for justice and equality for women through legal reform. Betty Goldstein Friedan, noted women's rights advocater, has been regarded by some historians as one of the leaders that attempted to change status-quo conditions of the sixties, relative to women's equal­ ity. Friedan's publication of The Feminine Mystique, in 1963, cautioned women that they did not have to adhere to society's image that supposedly prescribed their lifestyles. Betty Friedan noted that there is often a discrepancy between what women feel they want to achieve and what society has mandated that they attempt to achieve.
    [Show full text]