VIGILANCE SWITCHED OFF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN MEXICO: WHAT ARE THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF EDF AND THE APE? Authors: Camille Loyer, Swann Bommier, Cannelle Lavite, Guillermo Torres Contributions: Christian Schliemann, Jesús Guarneros, Fiona Noudjenoume, Verónica Vidal Publication director: Jean-François Dubost Graphic design: Isabelle Cadet CONTACTS Swann Bommier, Advocacy Officer for Corporate Regulation,
[email protected] Cannelle Lavite, Legal advisor, Businss and Human Rightscorporate and human rights litigation,
[email protected] Eduardo Villarreal, Coordinador de Análisis e Incidencia,
[email protected] Reference: XXX XX 21 Date: June 2021 ACRONYMS 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 EDF IN MEXICO: FROM BREACHES OF THE DUTY OF VIGILANCE TO THE BLINDNESS OF THE FRENCH 01 AUTHORITIES 6 1. A wind farm at the expense of indigenous peoples’ rights 8 2. Using the French justice system to uphold the rights of indigenous peoples in Mexico 14 3. The failings of the French authorities 17 L’AGENCE DES PARTICIPATIONS DE L’ÉTAT “GOVERNMENT SHAREHOLDING AGENCY” – APE: 02 THE STATE SHAREHOLDER’S FAILURE TO SET AN EXAMPLE 19 1. A brief history of the APE: from the Directorate General of the Treasury to the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Recovery 22 2. The APE: between opacity and communication effects 23 3. Post-COVID-19 recovery plan: a missed opportunity to review the APE’s mandate 26 THE STATE SHAREHOLDER’S RESPONSIBILITIES: 03 AN ESTABLISHED INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK 29 1. Corporate accountability for human rights violations by State-owned companies 32 a. The general framework for corporate responsibility with regard to human rights: the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Right 32 b.