SFCR 2019 Solvency and Financial Condition Report Munich Re (Group)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SFCR 2019 Solvency and Financial Condition Report Munich Re (Group) NOT IF, BUT HOW Contents 1 This document is a translation of the original German Executive summary 2 xxx 3 version and is intended to be used for informational A Business and performance 5 purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure A1 Business 5 the accuracy and completeness of the translation, please A2 Underwriting performance 8 note that the German original is binding. A3 Investment performance 12 A4 Performance of other activities 14 A5 Other information 14 B System of governance 16 B1 General information on the system of governance 16 B2 Fit and proper requirements 23 B3 Risk management system including the own risk and solvency assessment (ORSA) 26 B4 Internal control system 29 B5 Internal audit function 31 B6 Actuarial function 32 B7 Outsourcing 33 B8 Any other information 34 C Risk profile 36 C1 Underwriting risk 38 C2 Market risk 41 C3 Credit risk 44 C4 Liquidity risk 45 C5 Operational risk 46 C6 Other material risks 46 C7 Other risks 47 D Valuation for solvency purposes 50 D1 Assets 50 D2 Technical provisions 60 D3 Other liabilities 67 D4 Alternative methods for valuation 71 D5 Any other information 71 E Capital management 73 E1 Own funds 73 E2 Solvency capital requirement and minimum capital requirement 80 E3 Use of the duration-based equity risk sub-module in the calculation of the solvency capital requirement 81 E4 Differences between the standard formula and any internal model used 82 E5 Non-compliance with the minimum capital requirement and non-compliance with the solvency capital requirement 85 E6 Any other information 85 Annex 86 Templates in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2190 of 24 November 2017 88 List of abbreviations 99 Executive summary 2 Executive summary Part Page A – Business and The business activities in our reinsurance and ERGO fields of business are broken down 5–14 performance into material lines of business and regions. The technical result in reinsurance and ERGO was below the level of the previous year. In property-casualty reinsurance, the decline was driven by higher claims expenditure due to major losses from natural catastrophes. In life and health reinsurance, the lower result was mostly attributable to claims burdens from Australian disability business, which were only partially offset by good results in the USA and Europe. The technical result also fell in the ERGO field of business. Our investment result improved considerably compared with the previous year, in particular due to higher gains on disposals from our portfolio of fixed-interest securities and equities. B – System of Munich Re has an effective system of governance that is adequate for the nature, scale 16–34 governance and complexity of the risks inherent in its business. The remuneration system introduced in 2018 meets the relevant company and supervisory law requirements, and is in line with our business and risk management strategy. Persons who run the undertaking or perform other key tasks, including the key functions under Solvency II, have the professional qualifications, knowledge and experience to perform the relevant tasks and have the requisite fitness for office. The risk management system, including the own risk and solvency assessment (ORSA), is closely integrated into Group-wide planning, risk strategy and decision-making processes. Processes that are subject to material risks are reviewed on a regular basis as part of the internal control system. The outsourcing of operational activities and functions is monitored. C – Risk profile We quantify the solvency capital requirements (SCR) of the risk categories using an 36–48 internal model. At Group level, the SCR increased to €17.5bn compared with last year’s €14.7bn. Increases were seen in almost all risk categories. In the property-casualty reinsurance segment, the higher capital requirement was mainly attributable to further business growth in areas exposed to natural hazards in accordance with our business strategy. In life and health, the SCR increased mainly due to the fall in interest rates, movements in exchange rates and new business in life reinsurance, and due to the effects of lower interest rates for the ERGO life insurance companies. The credit-risk SCR also rose as a consequence of lower interest rates, as the fair value of fixed-interest investments increased. We use appropriate limit and early-warning systems to manage risks and limit risk concentrations. Risk is mitigated by means of reinsurance and retrocession and through the transfer of risk to the capital markets, for instance using derivative financial instruments. D – Valuation for The differences in measurement between the solvency balance sheet and IFRS financial 50–71 solvency purposes reporting are outlined for individual balance sheet items. These differences in measurement are mainly attributable to the fact that the solvency balance sheet is fully based on fair value, whilst IFRS uses a mixed measurement model based on fair value and amortised cost accounting. For further ease of comparison between the figures, differences between our IFRS accounts and the solvency balance sheet are explained for individual balance sheet items. Three life primary insurance companies (ERGO Lebensversicherung AG, Victoria Lebensversicherung AG, ERGO Versicherung AG, Vienna) apply a transitional deduction on technical provisions, and four primary insurers offering insurances of the person (ERGO Lebensversicherung AG, Victoria Lebensversicherung AG, DKV Belgium S.A., ERGO Insurance N.V.) use the volatility adjustment (Article 308d and Article 77d of Directive 2009/138/EC). Munich Re SFCR 2019 Executive summary 3 E – Capital We pursue active capital management, which ensures that our capitalisation is needs- 73–85 management based and risk-commensurate. Our eligible own funds (EOF) total €48.1bn. EOF in- creased by €4.4bn in the reporting period. Munich Re’s solvency capital requirement totalling €17.5bn as at 31 December 2019 is equivalent to a very comfortable solvency ratio of 274%. The solvency ratio shown includes transitional measures under Solvency II and the dividend for the 2019 financial year, as well as a share buy-back programme for 2020/2021, though the latter has been postponed until further notice. Excluding transitional measures, the solvency ratio would have been 237%. Due to rounding, there may be minor deviations in summations and in the calculation of percentages in the present report. Update due to Covid-19: Status as at 3 April 2020 Coronavirus COVID-19, the novel coronavirus, has been spreading Munich Re has already implemented measures designed to worldwide since early January 2020. The solvency balance cushion potential further repercussions of the COVID-19 sheet as at 31 December 2019 does not reflect the pandemic. potential impacts of COVID-19. Munich Re continues to have a very solid capital base. Measures designed to contain the virus spread in countries Even given the burden from the developments on the capi- such as China, Singapore and Japan seem to be resulting tal markets and COVID-19-related claims, the solvency ra- in some initial successes. However, the number of con- tio of Munich Re (Group) still remains comfortably within firmed COVID-19 cases worldwide is rising dramatically. In our optimal range of 175 – 220% (without application of an effort to slow the spread of the pandemic, many govern- the transitional measures). Even if we were to receive addi- ments have instituted drastic measures – some of which tional insurance claims in the range of a 200-year event, as restrict people’s freedom of movement, for instance, and calculated by Munich Re’s internal pandemic model, our hamper economic development. At present, there is great solvency ratio would still be significantly above 175%. This uncertainty as to what extent the measures put into figure also includes our recommended dividend pay-out practice will prove to be effective. It is also not at all clear and the originally planned share buy-back programme. whether the further spread of COVID-19 can be reduced to manageable levels. This uncertainty and the consequently As announced on 31 March 2020, we will still be proposing unpredictable repercussions for the economy are evident that the Annual General Meeting approve a dividend in- in the ways capital markets have reacted. It is currently crease to €9.80 per share. However, we will be postponing difficult to forecast how things will unfold. At the present the 2020/2021 share buy-back programme until further time, a worldwide pandemic with a high number of notice that was originally announced on 26 February 2020, fatalities combined with a rather prolonged global at least until we have a clearer picture both of the actual fi- recession cannot be ruled out. nancial consequences of COVID-19 and of the capital re- quirements needed to seize any potential organic or inor- Munich Re risk managers are monitoring current events ganic business opportunities. very closely. As part of our assessment of accumulation risk, we limited exposure on account of a worldwide Munich Re is standing by these decisions, even in light of pandemic. In addition, our pandemic scenario considers the statements by the European insurance supervisory au- capital market upheavals and a rise in credit defaults, thority EIOPA and the German Federal Financial Supervi- which can occur as a result of the pandemic’s impact on sory Authority BaFin on 2 April 2020. We have been in the global economy. In the property-casualty segment, we close contact with BaFin and have provided them with evi- expect COVID-19 to result in insurance claims pertaining dence of our solid risk-bearing capacity, even in the face of to cancelled major events. Indirectly, it is possible that extreme losses. BaFin expressed no reservations about our losses will also occur in other lines of business.