Functional Role of N-Terminal Extension of Human AP Endonuclease 1 in Coordination of Base Excision DNA Repair Via Protein–Protein Interactions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Functional Role of N-Terminal Extension of Human AP Endonuclease 1 In Coordination of Base Excision DNA Repair via Protein–Protein Interactions Nina Moor 1, Inna Vasil’eva 1 and Olga Lavrik 1,2,* 1 Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; [email protected] (N.M.); [email protected] (I.V.) 2 Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 12 February 2020; Accepted: 27 April 2020; Published: 28 April 2020 Abstract: Human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) has multiple functions in base excision DNA repair (BER) and other cellular processes. Its eukaryote-specific N-terminal extension plays diverse regulatory roles in interaction with different partners. Here, we explored its involvement in interaction with canonical BER proteins. Using fluorescence based-techniques, we compared binding affinities of the full-length and N-terminally truncated forms of APE1 (APE1ND35 and APE1ND61) for functionally and structurally different DNA polymerase β (Polβ), X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1 (XRCC1), and poly(adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), in the absence and presence of model DNA intermediates. Influence of the N-terminal truncation on binding the AP site-containing DNA was additionally explored. These data suggest that the interaction domain for proteins is basically formed by the conserved catalytic core of APE1. The N-terminal extension being capable of dynamically interacting with the protein and DNA partners is mostly responsible for DNA-dependent modulation of protein–protein interactions. Polβ, XRCC1, and PARP1 were shown to more efficiently regulate the endonuclease activity of the full-length protein than that of APE1ND61, further suggesting contribution of the N-terminal extension to BER coordination. Our results advance the understanding of functional roles of eukaryote-specific protein extensions in highly coordinated BER processes. Keywords: APE1; protein–protein interactions; base excision repair; multifunctional disordered protein; fluorescence techniques 1. Introduction Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) is an essential protein in mammals with multiple functions in base excision DNA repair (BER), regulation of gene expression, RNA metabolism, and other specific cellular processes [1–3]. BER is the primary mechanism for correcting apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites (created through N-glycosidic bond cleavage), modified bases, and single-strand breaks (SSBs) [4,5]. The major enzymatic function of APE1 in BER is the incision of AP sites, one of the most abundant types of oxidative DNA damage [6]. Additional activities of APE1, 30-diesterase, and 30-50-exonuclease contribute to removing terminal blocking groups in BER DNA intermediates and to proofreading DNA mismatches introduced by DNA polymerase β (Polβ)[1,3]. APE1 is also capable of incising DNA at certain base lesions (nucleotide incision repair) and RNA at abasic site and specific regions, as well as of processing abasic and oxidized ribonucleotides embedded in the DNA [1–3,7,8]. A redox activity of APE1 is responsible for the regulation of DNA-binding activities of different transcription factors [1,2]. The DNA repair and redox activities of APE1 can Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3122; doi:10.3390/ijms21093122 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, x 2 of 19 Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3122 2 of 18 of APE1 can play a collaborative role in different processes [9,10]. Interactions with multiple protein playpartners a collaborative that modulate role diverse in different enzymatic processes activities [9,10]. of Interactions APE1 and with mediate multiple its regulatory protein partners function that in modulatetranscription diverse are enzymatic highly activitiesinterconnected of APE1 andand mediate dynamically its regulatory regulated function inthrough transcription various are highlypost-translational interconnected modifications and dynamically of APE1 regulated [1,2,11–13]. through Dysregulation various post-translational of multifunctional modifications activities of ofAPE1 APE1 is [associated1,2,11–13]. with Dysregulation various human of multifunctional pathologies, making activities APE1 of APE1 a potential is associated therapeutic with various target human[1,5,12,14]. pathologies, making APE1 a potential therapeutic target [1,5,12,14]. The humanhuman APE1APE1 is is composed composed of of two two structural structural domains domains and and a disordered a disordered N-terminal N-terminal region region [15], formed[15], formed mostly mostly by the by sequence the sequence highly conservedhighly conserved in mammals in mammals (Figure1). (Figure The catalytically 1). The catalytically active core responsibleactive core forresponsible the enzyme for activities the enzyme in BER activities is created in by BER the universally is created conservedby the universally sequence 62–318conserved [16]. Thesequence region 62–318 required [16]. for The the redoxregion activity required of APE1for the is re indox the N-terminalactivity of APE1 domain is [in1]. the The N-terminal unique disordered domain region[1]. The comprises unique thedisordered nuclear localizationregion comprises signal and the multiple nuclear post-translational localization signal modification and multiple sites. Thispost-translational region, enriched modification in lysine residues,sites. This contributes region, enriched to APE1 in lysine interaction residues, with contributes various DNA to /APE1RNA structuresinteractionand with to acetylation-mediatedvarious DNA/RNA structures modulation an ofd theto acetylation-mediated enzyme DNA repair activitymodulationin vitro of andthe inenzyme vivo [ 17DNA–21 ].repair Ubiquitination activity in vitro and and acetylation in vivo of[17–21]. specific Ubiquitination Lys residues and of the acetylation N-terminal of specific region modulateLys residues the of expression the N-terminal level andregion diff modulateerent functions the expression of APE1 inlevel vivo andvia different proteolytic functions degradation of APE1 or limitedin vivo N-terminalvia proteolytic proteolysis, degradation respectively or limited [22,23 N-terminal]. The conserved proteolysis, catalytic respectively core and the [22,23]. N-terminal The extensionconserved arecatalytic both required core and for the the N-terminal APE1 function extens ation telomeric are both DNA required substrates for the and APE1 their function protective at proteintelomeric complexes DNA substrates [24,25]. and The their N-terminal protective extension protein of complexes APE1 contributes [24,25]. toThe a diN-terminalfferent extent extension to the interactionof APE1 contributes with proteins to a different involved extent in RNA to the processing interaction and with ribosome proteins biogenesis involved [in26 RNA]; its interactionprocessing withand ribosome nucleophosmin biogenesis (NPM1) [26]; is veryits interaction unstable to with be detected nucleophosmin in the absence (NPM1) of the is remainingvery unstable C-terminal to be portiondetected [ 20in]. the The absence first 35 of residues the remaining are critical C-terminal for the portion physical [20]. interaction The first of 35 APE1 residues with are X-ray critical repair for cross-complementingthe physical interaction protein of APE1 1 (XRCC1) with functioningX-ray repair as cross-complementing a scaffold protein of BERprotein [27 ].1 However,(XRCC1) involvementfunctioning as of a the scaffold N-terminal protein extension of BER of[27]. APE1 However, in the interaction involvement with of otherthe N-terminal canonical BERextension proteins of stillAPE1 remains in the interaction unexplored. with other canonical BER proteins still remains unexplored. Figure 1. Structural organization of human apurinicapurinic/apy/apyrimidinicrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1). Protein is composed ofof twotwo structural structural domains domains and and disordered disordered N-terminal N-terminal region region invisible invisible in crystal in crystal structures structures [15]. Sequence[15]. Sequence 62–318 62–318 responsible responsible for for AP AP endonuclease endonuclease activity activity is is conserved conserved in in pro-pro- andand eukaryotes; firstfirst 35 residues of of N-terminal N-terminal eukaryote-specific eukaryote-specific extension extension (residues (residues 1–61) 1–61) are are highly highly conserved conserved in inmammals mammals [16]. [ 16Isoelectric]. Isoelectric points points(calculated (calculated using Ex usingPASy ExPASyproteomics proteomics server) of server)full-length of full-lengthprotein, its protein,N-terminally its N-terminally truncated truncatedforms (APE1N forms (APE1NΔ35, APE1ND35, APE1NΔ61), Dthe61), entire the entire extension, extension, and and its mammalian-specificmammalian-specific fragment fragment are are presented. presented. We demonstrated the usefulness of fluorescence-based techniques for the detection and We demonstrated the usefulness of fluorescence-based techniques for the detection and quantification of physical interactions between various BER proteins, and for the detection of modulation quantification of physical interactions between various BER proteins, and for the detection of of protein–protein interactions by DNA intermediates [28]. In the present study, we used the same modulation of protein–protein interactions by DNA intermediates [28]. In the present