DOCSLIB.ORG

Uinta Basin Railway Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uinta Basin Railway Project PROPOSAL Professional Services for Engineering, Environmental, Permitting, Right-of-Way Planning, and Related Services Seven County Infrastructure Coalition Uinta Basin Railway Project November 1, 2018 November 1, 2018 ATTN: Mike McKee, Executive Director Seven County Infrastructure Coalition via secure link upload RE: Uinta Basin Railway Project Dear Mike McKee and Selection Committee Members: HDR is eager to help the Seven County Infrastructure Coalition deliver railroad service to the Uinta Basin by December 1, 2023. We know you need to complete your railroad with the least engineering, permitting, and construction cost, and the fastest possible environmental clearance. HDR has the vision and the proven methods to deliver your desired results. We understand the strategic value of speed to market. Our team has the experience and drive to accomplish this. From the 1,500-mile Alberta to Alaska Railway to the 150-mile CN-EJ&E merger to the 30-mile New Orleans & Gulf Coast, we have successfully delivered Surface Transportation Board (STB) and Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) environmental approvals, grants, loans and engineering for the largest freight railway projects across North America. Our team has been assembled for its experience, commitment, and performance. We possess the right blend of local knowledge and national expertise. We have partnered with Johansen & Tuttle Engineering, Juliano Consulting, Sunrise Engineering and other specialty consultants who also have deep Uinta Basin project experience and stakeholder understanding. Our outstanding Project Manager, Mark Hemphill, is a client-oriented professional with a proven track record in all of the skills needed to plan, engineer, permit, and construct a large greenfield railway. He is known in the railroad industry for his ability to navigate the federal permitting process to deliver commercially successful railway projects for private and public clients ranging from the State of Iowa to BNSF Railway. He will leverage his STB relationships and will have laser-like focus on schedule, budget, and your goal. You asked for an innovative approach to meet your schedule and keep costs low: • We’ve located an all-Utah route competitive in capital cost and mileage to your Rifle and Mack routes, avoiding potential political problems with Colorado and funding constraints from the Community Impact Board (CIB). This will provide equal access to BNSF Railway and Union Pacific (UP) near Westwater, and the opportunity for future railroad line expansion into San Juan County and southward. • We believe a Design-Build or Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) approach will deliver your railroad the fastest, and also substantially reduce your up-front costs. • We’ve included in the first 60 days of the project a Route and Alternatives Selection step, leading to an early meeting and consensus with the STB and your third-party contractor, to reduce cost and time for survey, engineering and baseline environmental studies. This will also minimize opportunities for environmental opposition. • We’ve priced our proposal to preserve your consultant budget, and we have included an option for Design-Bid-Build if that later becomes your preferred delivery option. We stand committed to deliver our respective firms’ resources as well as our personal best to deliver the Uinta Basin Railway on time, and within budget. We are truly excited by the opportunity this project represents. Our dedication and focus on a successful outcome will be unwavering. Sincerely, Mark Hemphill Bill Hjelholt Dave Nazare, PE Project Manager National Freight Rail Director Principal-in-Charge hdrinc.com 2825 East Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 200, Salt Lake City, Utah 84121 T 801.743.7800 F 801.743.7878 Contents Section 1 Project Team 01 Section 2 Capability of 08 the Consultant/ Experience Section 3 Approach to the 14 Project Section 4 Local Knowledge 24 and Experience Section 5 Cost 26 Section 6 Schedule Control 29 Appendix: Resumes Section 1 Project Team Seven County Infrastructure Coalition | Uinta Basin Railway Project Section 1 Project Team hdrinc.com Version # Section 1 Project Team Why the Coalition should Select HDR Years of experience, cultivated relationships, technical, permitting and financing expertise, and unique vision and approach– all with a laser-like focus on results…these are the traits the HDR team brings to the Coalition. We have partnered with Johansen & Tuttle Engineering (J&T), Juliano Consulting, Sunrise Engineering, UP Great Salt Lake Causeway Bridge and other specialty subconsultants to not only meet, but exceed, 2018 ACEC-UT Honor Award all requirements set forth in the scope of work in the Request for Proposal. Our strengths, highlighted below, will help the Recent HDR Railroad Projects in UT, CO & WY: Coalition obtain the required federal regulatory approvals by • Newfield Uinta Basin Feasibility Study (UT) December 1, 2020 and meet their December 1, 2023 operational • Central Utah Rail Third-Party EIS & Preliminary Engineering (UT) target date. • BNSF Hudson Crude Oil & Frac Sand Transload Center (CO) • Over 50 various BNSF mainline capacity projects (WY and CO) A Veteran Leadership Team • BNSF PTC Tower Permitting (WY & CO) Our leadership team – including Mark Hemphill, Don McCammon, • USACE/Hill AFB UTTR Rail Spur & Missile Storage Facility (UT) and Kevin Keller – have led HDR’s largest greenfield rail projects • UP Great Salt Lake Causeway Bridge and Culvert Crossing (UT for over 12 years. Most recently, they worked together on the • DM&E/CP Powder River Basin Coal Line Expansion (CO & WY) Newfield Uinta Basin Rail Feasibility Study, the 1,500-mile-long Alberta to Alaska Railway to haul Canadian oil to tidewater, the Implementing projects 500-mile Canadian Pacific Railway Powder River Basin Extension, that are safe with reliable and a 2,000-mile-long project to create a 12-train-per-day crude oil operations is how we corridor from secondary main lines and branch lines to a western define excellence. HDR Class I railroad. Mark, Don, and Kevin will be dedicated full time to offers a suite of services to streamline permitting, expedite the Coalition’s project, working in HDR’s Salt Lake City office to keep field investigations and fast track construction - to generate a the project on schedule. quicker return on your investment. Relationships with BNSF and Union Pacific companies located in the Basin. HDR is also respected by UDOT and HDR is the preferred and CDOT. We’ve also consulted with over 200 federally-recognized tribal largest provider of entities over the past 4 years as BNSF’s program manager for the PTC planning, engineering, Tower Permitting project. Pamela Juliano brings excellent Navajo and environmental analysis Ute Tribal Business Council relations on land and water, emergency and permitting, and real resource, and transportation issues. estate services for both BNSF and UP. We have more than 100 projects ongoing with these HDR is one of only three firms that STB relies on to successfully railroads including 20 which are major capacity or greenfield deliver NEPA documents for major rail actions in the past 5 years. projects. We are currently leading the engineering, permitting, real Our recent applicant project experience includes BNSF’s build- estate acquisition, bid and procurement package development, and in at Bayport, Texas, and the Alaska Railroad’s Port MacKenzie construction management of UP’s new $550 million Brazos Rail Yard Extension project where we completed baseline, engineering, and in Hearne, Texas – the largest capital investment on a single project operational studies. in UP’s 155-year history. Local Depth and Capacity of Staff Expertise HDR has consistently delivered on a myriad of project HDR has a large office in Salt Lake City with 80 technical deliverables‟ within a very challenging and dynamic project professionals supporting projects from planning through construction. environment. This level of performance has been instrumental We offer a full-service suite of real estate and utility relocation for on-time project delivery, high customer satisfaction, and services with extensive railroad and oil and gas experience. We also more accurate financial forecasting. I would recommend the have complementary offices in Colorado with access to more than HDR team to anyone looking for truly professional design and 200 technical professionals. In addition, with their extensive eastern Utah experience, Sunrise Engineering and J&T will complement HDR’s project management services. design team from investigation through design. Nicholas Konen, Manager of” Engineering, BNSF Railway ͠ Financing Expertise Federal, State, and Local Stakeholder Relationships HDR has secured nearly $1.5 billion in federal funds for 60 projects HDR is well-known to FRA through several large projects including for our clients, accounting for 19% of the total construction funds four intercity passenger rail projects and two major rail relocation awarded to date through USDOT grant proposals. This includes our projects. We have cultivated relationships with county governments, recent support of UDOT to win a TIGER grant for the Dog Canyon the local USDA and NRCS offices, state SHPOs and other Section Climbing Lanes and INFRA Large Project funding for the Northwest 106 consulting parties, and local midstream and oil production Quadrant Freight Mobility Project. 01 Seven County Infrastructure Coalition | Uinta Basin Railway Project Section 1 Project Team hdrinc.com SWCA Environmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reporting Marks
    Lettres d'appellation / Reporting Marks AA Ann Arbor Railroad AALX Advanced Aromatics LP AAMX ACFA Arrendadora de Carros de Ferrocarril S.A. AAPV American Association of Private RR Car Owners Inc. AAR Association of American Railroads AATX Ampacet Corporation AB Akron and Barberton Cluster Railway Company ABB Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Company ABBX Abbott Labs ABIX Anheuser-Busch Incorporated ABL Alameda Belt Line ABOX TTX Company ABRX AB Rail Investments Incorporated ABWX Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated AC Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACAX Honeywell International Incorporated ACBL American Commercial Barge Lines ACCX Consolidation Coal Company ACDX Honeywell International Incorporated ACEX Ace Cogeneration Company ACFX General Electric Rail Services Corporation ACGX Suburban Propane LP ACHX American Cyanamid Company ACIS Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACIX Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ACJR Ashtabula Carson Jefferson Railroad Company ACJU American Coastal Lines Joint Venture Incorporated ACL CSX Transportation Incorporated ACLU Atlantic Container Line Limited ACLX American Car Line Company ACMX Voith Hydro Incorporated ACNU AKZO Chemie B V ACOU Associated Octel Company Limited ACPX Amoco Oil Company ACPZ American Concrete Products Company ACRX American Chrome and Chemicals Incorporated ACSU Atlantic Cargo Services AB ACSX Honeywell International Incorporated ACSZ American Carrier Equipment ACTU Associated Container Transport (Australia) Limited ACTX Honeywell International Incorporated ACUU Acugreen Limited ACWR
    [Show full text]
  • Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 Lb (129,844 Kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas
    Report No. K-TRAN: KSU-16-5 ▪ FINAL REPORT▪ August 2017 Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Ph.D. Stacey Tucker-Kulesza, Ph.D. Lisa Shofstall Kansas State University Transportation Center 1 Report No. 2 Government Accession No. 3 Recipient Catalog No. K-TRAN: KSU-16-5 4 Title and Subtitle 5 Report Date Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) August 2017 Railcar Operational Status in Kansas 6 Performing Organization Code 7 Author(s) 7 Performing Organization Report Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Ph.D., Stacey Tucker-Kulesza, Ph.D., Lisa Shofstall No. 9 Performing Organization Name and Address 10 Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Kansas State University Transportation Center Department of Civil Engineering 11 Contract or Grant No. 2109 Fiedler Hall C2069 Manhattan, Kansas 66506 12 Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13 Type of Report and Period Kansas Department of Transportation Covered Bureau of Research Final Report 2300 SW Van Buren October 2015–December 2016 Topeka, Kansas 66611-1195 14 Sponsoring Agency Code RE-0691-01 15 Supplementary Notes For more information write to address in block 9. The rail industry’s recent shift towards larger and heavier railcars has influenced Class III/short line railroad operation and track maintenance costs. Class III railroads earn less than $38.1 million in annual revenue and generally operate first and last leg shipping for their customers. In Kansas, Class III railroads operate approximately 40 percent of the roughly 2,800 miles (4,500 km) of rail; however, due to the current Class III track condition, they move lighter railcars at lower speeds than Class I railroads.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Investigation Report R07d0111 Crossing Collision
    RAILWAY INVESTIGATION REPORT R07D0111 CROSSING COLLISION VIA RAIL CANADA INC. PASSENGER TRAIN NUMBER 35 MILE 23.57, CANADIAN NATIONAL KINGSTON SUBDIVISION PINCOURT/TERRASSE-VAUDREUIL, QUEBEC 17 DECEMBER 2007 The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigated this occurrence for the purpose of advancing transportation safety. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. Railway Investigation Report Crossing Collision VIA Rail Canada Inc. Passenger Train Number 35 Mile 23.57, Canadian National Kingston Subdivision Pincourt/Terrasse-Vaudreuil, Quebec 17 December 2007 Report Number R07D0111 Synopsis On 17 December 2007, at approximately 1549 eastern standard time, VIA Rail Canada Inc. passenger train No. 35, travelling westward at 62 mph on the south main track of Canadian National’s Kingston Subdivision, struck an empty tractor-trailer that was immobilized on the 3e Avenue level public crossing located at Mile 23.57, near Pincourt/Terrasse-Vaudreuil, Quebec. The tractor-trailer was destroyed; the locomotive was damaged and was unable to continue. Subsequently, 76 passengers were transferred to another VIA Rail Canada Inc. train and rail traffic was delayed for up to 3 ½ hours. The truck driver sustained minor injuries. There was no derailment and no track damage. Ce rapport est également disponible en français. © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada 2009 Cat. No. TU3-6/07-1E ISBN 978-1-100-12406-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Factual Information .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Trainmaster the Oregon Rail Heritage Center Opens
    The Trainmaster The Official Publication of the Pacific Northwest Chapter October 2012 National Railway Historical Society Portland, Oregon The Oregon Rail Heritage Center Opens Photo by Arlen Sheldrake October 2012 Pacific Northwest Chapter National Railway Historical Society The Trainmaster Page 1 Photos by Trent Stetz Over 160 enthusiastic ORHF volunteers welcomed and hosted over 6,300 excited guests (with 3,622 on Saturday 22nd and 2,737 on Sunday 23rd) at the opening weekend of the Oregon Rail Heritage Center near the new Portland Streetcar Central Loop extension stop at OMSI. Oregon rail history was brought alive by the three historic steam locomotives, the 1941 Southern Pacific 4449, the 1938 Spokane, Portland and Seattle 700, and the 1905 Oregon Rail and Navigation 197 which were all on display in their new engine house accompanied on site by two diesel locomotives, a PA-1 and RSD-5, and six heritage passenger cars outside. The 4449 was steamed up with its head poked out the engine house door and gave an occasional toot to the delight of the attendees. The weekend visitors got to view the cabs of both 4449 and 700. A very extensive Lego exhibit included a model of the Portland Customs house as well as Portland Union Station. The Operation Lifesaver trailer was on hand to educate the guests. The kids enjoyed a Chuggington Station play area. Tours were given of three heritage passenger cars including the 1941 SP "James J. Gilmore" parlor/lounge round end observation, the 1954 SP "Gordon Zimmerman" Baggage Car, and the 1950 SP&S Mount Hood Sleeper-Lounge Car.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta-To-Alaska-Railway-Pre-Feasibility-Study
    Alberta to Alaska Railway Pre-Feasibility Study 2015 Table of Content Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... i Infrastructure and Operating Requirements................................................................ ii Environmental Considerations and Permitting Requirements .................................... ii Capital and Operating Cost Estimates ......................................................................... iii Business Case .............................................................................................................. iii Mineral Transportation Potential ................................................................................ iii First Nations/Tribes and Other Contacts ..................................................................... iv Conclusions .................................................................................................................. iv 1 | Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 This Assignment............................................................................................................ 1 This Report ................................................................................................................... 2 2 | Infrastructure and Operating Requirements ........................................................ 3 Route Alignment ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Perseverance and Ingenuity Perseverance of a Tale by Ben Traylor
    A Tale of Perseverance and Ingenuity Perseverance of A Tale by Ben Traylor Through excellent customer service and sound business management practices, provide safe, efficient, and economical transportation and real estate services that support and grow economic development opportunities for the State of Alaska. by Scott Adams Scott by TABLE OF CONTENTS Alaska Railroad Leadership 1 Leadership Year in Review 2 Business Highlights 8 Financial Highlights 10 Transmittal Letter 12 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SECTION Contact Information and Office Locations Back by Judy Patrick Judy by MANAGEMENT TEAM Clark Hopp Jim Kubitz Chief Operating Officer VP Real Estate Barbara Amy Brian Lindamood Chief Financial Officer VP Engineering Andy Behrend Dale Wade Chief Counsel VP Marketing and Bill O’Leary Customer Service President & CEO Jennifer Haldane Chief Human Resources Officer BOARD OF DIRECTORS Craig Campbell Judy Petry Julie Anderson John Binkley Chair Vice Chair Commissioner Director Gov. Mike Dunleavy appointed Bill Sheffield as by Ken Edmier Ken by Chair Emeritus Jack Burton John MacKinnon John Shively Director Commissioner Director 1 YEAR IN REVIEW A Tale of Perseverance and Ingenuity Once upon a time, in a world not yet steeped in pandemic, the Alaska Railroad Corporation (ARRC) began the year 2020 with optimism, ready to share a story of emergence from fiscal uncertainty. Yet, when the last page turned on 2020, our tale didn’t end with happily-ever-after; nor did it conclude as a tragedy. Instead, 2020’s narrative featured everyday heroes, brandishing their perseverance and ingenuity to fight common foes — the villain Pandemic and its sidekick Recession. Just two months into a promising new year, the rogue novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) appeared on scene, soon spreading throughout the land.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2017 Enforcement Report
    Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2017 Enforcement Report Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Summary of Inspections and Audits Performed, and of Enforcement Actions Recommended in FY 2017 A. Railroad Safety and Hazmat Compliance Inspections and Audits 1. All Railroads and Other Entities (e.g., Hazmat Shippers) Except Individuals 2. Railroads Only B. Summary of Railroad Safety Violations Cited by Inspectors, by Regulatory Oversight Discipline or Subdiscipline 1. Accident/Incident Reporting 2. Grade Crossing Signal System Safety 3. Hazardous Materials 4. Industrial Hygiene 5. Motive Power and Equipment 6. Railroad Operating Practices 7. Signal and train Control 8. Track C. FRA and State Inspections of Railroads, Sorted by Railroad Type 1. Class I Railroads 2. Probable Class II Railroads 3. Probable Class III Railroads D. Inspections and Recommended Enforcement Actions, Sorted by Class I Railroad 1. BNSF Railway Company 2. Canadian National Railway/Grand Trunk Corporation 3. Canadian Pacific Railway/Soo Line Railroad Company 4. CSX Transportation, Inc. 5. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company 6. National Railroad Passenger Corporation 7. Norfolk Southern Railway Company 8. Union Pacific Railroad Company III. Summaries of Civil Penalty Initial Assessments, Settlements, and Final Assessments in FY 2017 A. In General B. Summary 1—Brief Summary, with Focus on Initial Assessments Transmitted C. Breakdown of Initial Assessments in Summary 1 1. For Each Class I Railroad Individually in FY 2017 2. For Probable Class II Railroads in the Aggregate in FY 2017 3. For Probable Class III Railroads in the Aggregate in FY 2017 4. For Hazmat Shippers in the Aggregate in FY 2017 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Baker & Miller Pllc
    301783 ENTERED BAKER & MILLER PLLC Office of Proceedings March 19 2021 Part of 2401 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW S U I T E 3 0 0 Public Record WASHINGTON, DC 20037 ( 2 0 2 ) 6 6 3 - 7 8 2 0 ( 2 0 2 ) 6 6 3 - 7 8 4 9 William A. Mullins Direct Dial: (202) 663 - 7 8 2 3 E - M a i l : [email protected] March 19, 2021 VIA E-FILING Ms. Cynthia T. Brown Chief, Section of Administration Office of Proceedings Surface Transportation Board 395 E Street, S.W., Room 1034 Washington, DC 20423-0001 Re: FD 36472 CSX Corporation and CSX Transportation, Inc. – Control and Merger – Pan Am Systems, Inc., Pan Am Railways, Inc., Boston & Maine Corporation, Maine Central Railroad Company, Northern Railroad, Pan Am Southern LLC, Portland Terminal Company, Springfield Terminal Railway Company, Stony Brook Railroad Company, and Vermont & Massachusetts Railroad Company FD 36472 (Sub-No. 5) Pittsburg & Shawmut Railroad, LLC d/b/a Berkshire & Eastern Railroad – Operation of Property of Rail Carrier Pan Am Southern LLC – Pan Am Southern LLC and Springfield Terminal Railway Company Reply Comments of Norfolk Southern Railway Company Dear Ms. Brown: Norfolk Southern Railway Company (“NSR”) hereby submits the following comments in reply to the Application (the “Application”) filed by CSX Corporation (“CSX”) and CSX Transportation, Inc. (“CSXT”) (collectively, the “Applicants”). NSR supports the proposed transaction as submitted. Baker & Miller PLLC Ms. Cynthia T. Brown March 19, 2021 Page 2 of 4 NSR initially had some concerns about possible adverse anticompetitive effects that would arise from an unconditioned transaction,1 but CSXT and NSR have discussed and worked through those concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State
    Draft Report June 2020 Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State Washington State Joint Transportation Committee Our ref: 23685001 Draft Report June 2020 Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Washington State Joint Transportation Committee 2201 Cooperative Way, Suite 606 Columbia Street NW, 600 Suite 105, Herndon, VA 20171 Olympia, WA 98504-0937 +1 (703) 788-6500 www.steergroup.com Our ref: 23685001 Steer has prepared this material for Washington State Joint Transportation Committee. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State | Draft Report Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... i Overview ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Choices 3
    Transportation Choices 3 MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE | MOVEMENT OF FREIGHT AND GOODS Introduction Facilities Snapshot This chapter organizes the transportation system into two categories: movement of people, and movement of freight and goods. Movement of people encompasses active transportation, transit, rail, air, and automobiles. Movement of freight and goods encompasses rail, marine cargo, air, vehicles, and pipelines. 3 Three Airports: one commercial, two Community Consistent with federal legislation (23 CFR 450.306) and Washington State Legislation (RCW 47.80.030), the regional transportation system includes: 23 Twenty-three Fixed Transit Routes ▶All state-owned transportation facilities and services (highways, park-and-ride lots, etc); 54 Fifty-Four Miles of Multi-Use Trails ▶All local principal arterials and selected minor arterials the RTPO considers necessary to the plan; 2.1 Multi- ▶Any other transportation facilities and services, existing and Two Vehicles per Household* proposed, including airports, transit facilities and services, roadways, Modal rail facilities, marine transportation facilities, pedestrian/bicycle Transport facilities, etc., that the RTPO considers necessary to complete the 5 regional plan; and Five Rail Lines System ▶Any transportation facility or service that fulfills a regional need or impacts places in the plan, as determined by the RTPO. 4 Four Ports *Source: US Census Bureau, 2014 ACS 5-year estimates. Chapter 3 | Transportation Choices 39 Figure 3-1: JourneyMode to ChoiceWork -ModeJourney Choice to Work in the RTPO, 2014 Movement of People Walk/ Bike, Public Transit, 2.2% Other, 4.3% People commute for a variety of reasons, and likewise, a variety of 1.2% ways. This section includes active transportation, transit, passenger Carpooled, 12.6% rail, passenger air, and passenger vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Electric Locomotive
    Volume 22 Issue 2 Spring 2017 Reminder to members: Please be sure your dues are In This Issue Oregon Electric #21 has Arrived …………….……………………............. 1 up to date. 2017 dues were due Jan 1, 2017. If it has Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society News…………………..……. 2 Save the Dates……………………………………………………..…………4 been longer than one year since you renewed, go to What’s New in the Gift Shop Carolyn Vernon…………..………………….4 our website: oergontrolley.com and download an WST News Jan Zweerts……………………………..……………………….5 Donations and Bequests Making a Difference………………………….…5 application by clicking: Become a Member. PCC’s in Kenosha Mark Kavanagh…………….………………………..….6 OERHS Member Kevin Reilly…………………………………………….....8 Donation Request…………………………………………………………...10 YOU Brought It Home To Oregon Oregon Electric – As Museum Director Greg Bonn put it, “For Locomotive #21 months it was a steady diet of stomach acid and adrenaline but thanks to everyone involved and our own By Multiple Authors well-trained crew, it turned out to be one of the most successful projects.” The museum’s largest and most expensive equipment acquisition project to date was completed, physically, after the OE #21 was successfully set on home rails at the museum on Wednesday, March 1st. Scheduling the move began in early February and after a couple of equipment and personnel issues, the lift began early morning Feb. 27th, just as it began to snow, and finished early in the afternoon, still snowing. Setting a wheelset on the trailer at FVHRS. Lifting the body at FVHRS. The body left shortly after loading, crossed the border and spent the night in Marysville, WA.
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT Michigan State Rail Plan Tech Memo 2 Existing Conditions
    Technical Memorandum #2 March 2011 Prepared for: Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 2. Freight Rail System Profile ......................................................................................2 2.1. Overview ...........................................................................................................2 2.2. Class I Railroads ...............................................................................................2 2.3. Regional Railroads ............................................................................................6 2.4. Class III Shortline Railroads .............................................................................7 2.5. Switching & Terminal Railroads ....................................................................12 2.7. State Owned Railroads ...................................................................................16 2.8. Abandonments ................................................................................................18 2.10. International Border Crossings .....................................................................22 2.11. Ongoing Border Crossing Activities .............................................................24 2.12. Port Access Facilities ....................................................................................24 3. Freight Rail Traffic ................................................................................................25
    [Show full text]