Pt-Information-Guide.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Item 12 Attachment 1 SOI for Board July 2021
1 Auckland Transport Statement of Intent 2021/22-2023/24 2 Auckland Transport Statement of Intent 2021/22-2023/24 Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………..………..4 Part I: Strategic overview Roles and Responsibilities…………………………………………………………………..………6 Responses to council’s strategic objectives.…………………………………………….………...7 Nature and scope of activities……………………………………………………….……….……15 About us……………………………………………………………………………………….……..21 Part II: Statement of Performance Expectation Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………..……24 How we will deliver - annual work programme……………….…………………………..….…..53 Financial statements………………………………………………………………………….…….63 3 Auckland Transport Statement of Intent 2021/22-2023/24 Introduction The past year has been one underlined by change, requiring swift and decisive responses to an incredibly dynamic situation. The COVID-19 pandemic (COVID-19) has become a part of our day-to-day lives and will remain a source of uncertainty in the discharge of our duties and role as Auckland’s road controlling authority, and provider of public transport. Despite the challenge posed by COVID-19, Auckland Transport (AT) continued to function and support the Auckland community while keeping the health and safety of our frontline staff and customers as our utmost priority. AT’s actions and prompt messaging were recognised by the Association of Local Government Information Management (ALGIM), placing first in the exercise of leadership and innovation during COVID-19. COVID-19 has had flow-on effects, resulting in legislative change, as well as financial constraints. AT has been assisting Auckland Council (Council) in navigating the new processes introduced by the new Fast Track Consenting Act, while also continuing to focus on project delivery across the region. With a decreased and limited budget, and work further hampered by shifting COVID-19 Alert Levels in Auckland, AT learnt to operate in an uncertain climate. -
Auckland District Plan
E E See Appendix 6 Diagram 12 !1!82A 307 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 182 ! ! !R I M ! ! U ! ! ! R ! ! O ! ! A ! D ! M O A ! ! N H ! U ! ! R ! ! N ! ! ! A ! ! ! ! G ! ! M ! ! ! A ! ! P ! ! ! ! D ! ! R 182 ! ! 2 I ! S V ! ! ! O E ! ! U ! O ! ! ! 6 T ! F ! H ! ! ! F ! - ! ! W ! ! ! R ! ! ! ! ! E A ! M ! ! S ! ! ! ! 12 T P ! ! ! E ! ! ! ! R ! ! 14A ! N ! ! ! ! Mangere Inlet M ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! O ! ! ! ! ! Ngarango Otainui ! ! T ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! O ! ! ! R ! ! ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! A ! ! Island ! ! Y ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 182A ! ! ! ! D ! A ! ! RO ! ! ! ! U M IM ! ! ! ! R A ! ! H ! ! ! ! ! U ! ! ! ! ! N ! ! ! ! ! ! ! G ! ! 182A ! ! A ! ! ! ! ! ! D ! ! ! ! R ! ! ! ! I ! ! 22 V ! ! ! ! ! E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! S ! ! 26 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! o ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! u ! ! t ! h ! 21 ! 32 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! AD ! RO ! ! ! O 31 MIR ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! 5 ! ! ! ! ! 42 ! ! ! ! ! 307 ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! 42 ! ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! 12 ! ! ! ! 46 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 17C ! NUE ! VE ! ! A ! 17B A 31 ON ! M ! ! 16 ! ! 182 5 ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 17 ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! ! 17A 12 ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! " c ! ! !! ! e ! ! 280 !! s ! ! ! t 11 3A ! ! ! e ! 1 ! ! r ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 81 2 ! ! ! ! ! 77 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 71 56 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! " c ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! 62A ! ! ! 62 ! ! ! ! ! 5 ! ! ! ! 5 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 3 ! ! 66 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 51 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! E U ! ! ! ! N 11 VE ! ! E A ! I ! ! ! ST ! 41 ! ! HA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72 ! ! ! ! ! ! 3 ! ! 56 ! -
2140 the NEW ZEALAND GAZEITE No. 75
2140 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZEITE No. 75 Mitchell, Len, 23A Melvern Road, Morningside, Auckland, Roff, Roy Douglas, 33 Bremner A venue, Mount Roskill, seaman. radio technician. Roulston, James Donald, 30 Buckingham Crescent, Papatoetoe, Moerua, John Te Rata, 41 Brown Street, Ponsonby, bus driver. contract painter. Moger, John Peter, 189 Queen Street, Northcote, contractor. Roy, John Scott, Alfriston, farmer Moitie, Maurice Rex, 25 Arnold Street, Grey Lynn, decorator. Rudolph, Edward Moses, 75 Taniwha Street, Glen Innes, driver. Moller, Neville John Carl, 76 Ponsonby Road, Ponsonby, milk Ruka, Daniel McLean, 14 Paddington Street, Glen Innes, freezing bar proprietor. worker. Monrad, Kathleen Miroa, 35 Station Road, Paeroa, (trading as Russell, Eric Leslie, 52 Uxbridge Road, Howick, sales representa Monrad's Contracting Services). tive. Montgomerie, Donald Raymond, 9 Cadman Avenue, One Tree Russell, William John, 63 Bay Road, St. Heliers Bay, Auckland, Hill, car painter. plasterer. Moore, Graham Robert, 16 St. Leonards Road, Kelston, Russell, William Raymond, 6 Sullivan Avenue, Mount Roskill, braider. cleaner. Morgan, Dulcie Wilma, 929 Dominion Road, Mount Roskill, 'Russell, Walter Rejford, 5 Hull Place, Onehunga, foundry married woman. worker. Morine, Gilbert Graham, 32 Denbigh Avenue, Mount Roskill, Samson, Terence Patrick, 34 Seaside Avenue, Waterview, storeman driver. Auckland, medical student. Munro, Charles William, 6 Palm Avenue, Pakuranga, workman. Sanft, Desmond Tupou, 21 Tutanekai Street, Grey Lynn, Murin, Ivan, 126A Remuera Road, Auckland, baker. labourer. Muru, Hehi, 291 Puhinui Road, Papatoetoe, contractor. Scandrett, Eric Reid, 28 Park Avenue, Otahuhu, electrician. McArthur, James Allen, 59 Hall Avenue, Otahuhu, driver. Scarry, Kevin James, 7 Netherton Street, Avondale, carpenter. McConnell, Harvey Alan, 11 Pine Street, New Lynn, assistant Scott, John Nunn, 64 Deep Creek Road, Torbay, storeman signwriter. -
Gulf Harbour Rakino Matiatia Pine Harbour Whangaparaoa Peninsula Waiheke Island Rakino Island Beachlands Ferry Services
Army Bay Army Bay Okoromai Bay Tindalls Beach Te Haruhi Bay Gulf Matakatia Harbour Marina Bay Gulf Harbour Manly Gulf Harbour Little Manly Little Manly Army Bay Army Bay Okoromai Bay Rakino Tindalls Island Beach Te Haruhi Bay Gulf Matakatia Harbour Marina Rakino Bay Gulf Harbour Manly Gulf Harbour Mairangi Bay Little Manly Campbells Bay Little Manly Castor Bay Castor Bay ek re C s a c u L Army Bay Forrest Hill Army Milford Bay Milford Beach Motutapu Island Greenhithe Wairau Valley Herald to Gulf Harbour Owhanake Bay Island Okoromai Mawhitipana Bay Enclosure Bay TindallsLake Bay mo Creek Bayview Te Haruhi Orua PupukeBeach Bay Milford Milford Sunnybrae Gulf Beach Matiatia Palm Hobsonville Beach Matakatia Harbour Matiatia Bay Motutapu Sandy t Marina Oneroa Bay ia Inle Island roh Bay Gulf Greenhithe Matiatia Beach Palm Beach aia Sunset Bay Wairau Oneroa W Takapuna Harbour Rangitoto Valley Wharf Glenfield Herald Island to Gulf Harbour Hobsonville Beach Haven Manly Takapuna Island Waiheke Catalina Beach Lake Point amo Creek Bayview Pupuke Island Bay Oru Gulf Harbour Sunnybrae Birkdale Hillcrest Hobsonville Ferry Services et Beach Haven ia Inl roh Te Miro Bay aia Sunset Bay Blackpool Little W Takapuna Rangitoto Blackpool Manly Glenfield Island Beach Hobsonville Beach Haven Takapuna Note: Tourist and car Hobsonville Point Catalina Beach Surfdale Bay ferry services to various Birkdale Hillcrest Little Beach Haven Manly Hauraki Hauraki Gulf islands are Surfdale Beach Limeburners Highbury Huiruhi Bay Bay Hobsonville offered by Fullers, 360 Ostend -
Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices a - J February TR 2009/009
Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices A - J February TR 2009/009 Auckland Regional Council Technical Report No. 009 February 2009 ISSN 1179-0504 (Print) ISSN 1179-0512 (Online) ISBN 978-1-877528-16-3 Contents Appendix A: Consultants Brief Appendix B: Peer reviewer’s comments Appendix C: Summary of Relevant Tonkin & Taylor Jobs Appendix D: Summary of Shoreline Characterization Appendix E: Field Investigation Data Appendix F: Summary of Regional Beach Properties Appendix G: Summary of Regional Cliff Properties Appendix H: Description of Physical Setting Appendix I: Heli-Survey DVDs (Contact ARC Librarian) Appendix J: Analysis of Beach Profile Changes Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion, Volume 2: Appendices A-J Appendix A: Consultants Brief Appendix B: Peer reviewer’s comments Appendix C: Summary of relevant Tonkin & Taylor jobs Job Number North East Year of Weathered Depth is Weathered Typical Cliff Cliff Slope Cliff Slope Composite Composite Final Slope Geology Rec Setback erosion rate Comments Street address Suburb investigation layer depth Estimated/ layer Slope weathered layer Height (deg) (rads) slope from slope from (degree) from Crest (m) (m/yr) (m) Greater than (deg) slope (rad) (m) calc (degree) profile (deg) 6 RIVERVIEW PANMURE 12531.000 2676066 6475685 1994 2.40 58 0.454 12.0 51.5 0.899 43.70 35 35 avt 6 ROAD 15590.000 6472865 2675315 2001 2.40 0.454 4.0 30.0 0.524 27.48 27 avt 8 29 MATAROA RD OTAHUHU 16619.000 6475823 2675659 1999 2.40 0.454 6.0 50.0 0.873 37.07 37 avt LAGOON DRIVE PANMURE long term recession ~ FIDELIS AVENUE 5890.000 2665773 6529758 1983 0.75 G 0.454 0.000 N.D Kk 15 - 20 0.050 50mm/yr 80m setback from toe FIDELIS AVE ALGIES BAY recc. -
Southeastern Manukau / Pahurehure Inlet Contaminant Study: Hydrodynamic, Wave and Sediment-Transport Model Implementation and Calibration December TR 2008/056
Southeastern Manukau / Pahurehure Inlet Contaminant Study: Hydrodynamic, Wave and Sediment-Transport Model Implementation and Calibration December TR 2008/056 Auckland Regional Council Technical Report No.056 December 2008 ISSN 1179-0504 (Print) ISSN 1179-0512 (Online) ISBN 978-1-877528-04-0 Technical Report. First Edition. Reviewed by: Approved for ARC Publication by: Name: Judy-Ann Ansen Name: Matthew Davis Position: Acting Team Leader Position: Group Manager Stormwater Action Team Partnerships & Community Programmes Organisation: Auckland Regional Council Organisation: Auckland Regional Council Date: 28 October 2010 Date: 28 October 2010 Recommended Citation: Pritchard, M; Gorman, R; Lewis, M. (2008). Southeastern Manukau Harbour / Pahurehure Inlet Contaminant Study. Hydrodynamic Wave and Sediment Transport Model Implementation and Calibration. Prepared by NIWA for Auckland Regional Council. Auckland Regional Council Technical Report 2008/056. © 2008 Auckland Regional Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Regional Council's (ARC) copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This -
Individual Submissions J - Z Contents Page
Individual Submissions J - Z Contents Page Please note: As some submitters did not provide their first names they have been ordered in the submissions received list under their title. These submitters are as follows: o Mr Burgess is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mr o Mrs Davey is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mrs o Mrs Dromgool is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mrs o Mrs Peters is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mrs o Mr Ripley is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mr We apologise for any confusion the above ordering of submissions may have caused. If your submission is not displayed here, contains incorrect information or is missing some parts, please email us on [email protected] or contact Mathew Stewart on (09) 447 4831 Sub # Submitter Page 851 J Dromgool 13 870 Jacob Phillips 13 15 Jacob Samuel 13 178 Jacqueline Anne Church 13 685 Jacqui Fisher 13 100 James Houston 13 854 James Lockhart 13 302 Jamie Revell 13 361 Jan Heijs 14 372 Jane Blow 14 309 Jane Briant-Turner 14 482 Janet Hunter 14 662 Janet Pates 14 656 Janie Flavell 14 634 Jarrod Ford (NB: we apologise if this name is incorrect, we were 14 unable to clearly decipher the writing) 718 Jason Lafaele 14 605 Jaydene Haku 15 746 Jeanette Collie 15 149 Jeanette Valerie Cooper 15 177 Jennifer Collett 15 681 Jennifer Olson 15 818 Jennifer Preston 15 832 Jenny TeWake 15 1 Sub # Submitter Page 373 Jeremy Lees-Green 15 85 Jesse McKenzie 16 843 Jessica Currie -
AT Deliverables Project Results to 31 March 2020
AT Deliverables Project Results to 31 March 2020 FINANCE Task / Project Strategic Theme Project Results Comment/s Finance Review completed. Findings will be incorporated into the Reshape AT Review of current billing process for non-core external revenues On Target project. The overall structure of the Performance Management Framework is Version 1.0 of organisational Performance Management Framework created On Target completed, and the overarching level 1 metrics are confirmed. 2019/20 Half Year Audit and Reporting Continually transform and elevate customer On Target experience AC Quarter 2 reporting pack submitted On Target 2020/21 Budget (Annual Plan) prepared, with key focus on PT growth, special Pre Covid budget approved, submitted to AC as planned. Covid-19 budget On Target events, capital delivery and funding submitted to support consultation. Initiate work to asses funding options for electric buses Risk of non-achievement Work suspended due to Covid-19. Capital Performance Ensure forecasting and review processes are in place to deliver of 90% of the Risk of non-achievement Non achievement due to impacts of Covid-19. 2019-20 capital programme High level capital programme developed pre-Covid-19. Due to Covid-19 Contributes towards achievement of all 2020-21 high level Capital programme finalised Below, but likely to achieve impacts AT’s 2020/21 capital envelope will be materially reduced and will Strategic themes be finalised between now and 31 July. Working closely with ATAP and LTP working groups to ensure there is Contribute to the development of the 2021-2031 RLTP On Target alignment between the new plans and the current operating environment. -
An Investigation Into the Travel Preferences and Potentional For
Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. BY LAND OR SEA? An investigation into the travel preferences and potential for ferry patronage of the residents of the Whangaparaoa Peninsula A thesis presented in partial fu lfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Management at Massey University, Albany, New Zealand. JULIET MARY HYATT 2003 ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to establish an understanding of the travel preferences of the residents of the Whangaparaoa Peninsula with a view to assessing the likelihood of future patronage of a ferry service from the Whangaparaoa Peninsula to downtown Auckland and to North Shore City. The factors that impact on the travel decision-making of residents in respect of ferry travel were identified, to assist both operators and local bodies responsible for the provision of transport infrastructure in their planning for improved ferry services from the Whangaparaoa Peninsula. A survey of residents of the Whangaparaoa Peninsula was conducted by way of a self-reply postal questionnaire sent to a random sample of 700 residents over the age of 20 years. The questionnaire was designed to collect data concerning current travel behaviour and stated preferences in respect of ferry travel. A total of308 completed questionnaires were received. A second self-reply questionnaire was administered by the researcher to patrons of the current Gulf Harbour commuter ferry service. -
The Demographic Transformation of Inner City Auckland
New Zealand Population Review, 35:55-74. Copyright © 2009 Population Association of New Zealand The Demographic Transformation of Inner City Auckland WARDLOW FRIESEN * Abstract The inner city of Auckland, comprising the inner suburbs and the Central Business District (CBD) has undergone a process of reurbanisation in recent years. Following suburbanisation, redevelopment and motorway construction after World War II, the population of the inner city declined significantly. From the 1970s onwards some inner city suburbs started to become gentrified and while this did not result in much population increase, it did change the characteristics of inner city populations. However, global and local forces converged in the 1990s to trigger a rapid repopulation of the CBD through the development of apartments, resulting in a great increase in population numbers and in new populations of local and international students as well as central city workers and others. he transformation of Central Auckland since the mid-twentieth century has taken a number of forms. The suburbs encircling the TCentral Business District (CBD) have seen overall population decline resulting from suburbanisation, as well as changing demographic and ethnic characteristics resulting from a range of factors, and some areas have been transformed into desirable, even elite, neighbourhoods. Towards the end of the twentieth century and into the twenty first century, a related but distinctive transformation has taken place in the CBD, with the rapid construction of commercial and residential buildings and a residential population growth rate of 1000 percent over a fifteen year period. While there are a number of local government and real estate reports on this phenomenon, there has been relatively little academic attention to its nature * School of Environment, The University of Auckland. -
Rail Electrification and Extension from Papakura to Pukekohe Updates Glossary
Agenda Item 13 (iv) Rail Electrification and Extension from Papakura to Pukekohe Updates Glossary Auckland Council (AC) Auckland Electrified Area (AEA) Auckland Plan (AP) Auckland Transport (AT) Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles (CAF) Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) Electric Multiple Unit (EMU) KiwiRail Group (KRG) New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) North Auckland Line (NAL) North Island Main Trunk Line (NIMT) Onehunga Branch Line (OBL) Regional Land Transport Programme (RLTP) Rapid Transit Network (RTN) Executive Summary Item 1: Auckland Rail Electrification Update AT and KRG are currently undertaking preparatory works for electrification of the Auckland Rail Network between Papakura and Swanson Stations, with the first EMU services being tested and commissioned from September 2013. The target is for EMU passenger services to be introduced from December 2013, initially on the OBL. The remainder of the EMU fleet will be introduced in stages until the full fleet is in service under current programme timelines in mid-2016. The electrification projects can be grouped as follows: a) Installation and commissioning of electrification infrastructure: overhead wires, gantries, earthing of stations, etc., primary responsibility with KRG. b) Station and depot infrastructure: preparation for electrification includes construction of an EMU depot at Wiri, upgrading of a number of existing stations to a common standard, construction of a new station at Parnell, ensuring sufficient stabling for the EMU fleet. Responsibility is primarily with AT; c) Procurement of new EMU fleet: Including operational transitioning from the existing DMU and diesel locomotives to the new EMUs. Responsibility rests with AT. d) Operational readiness for electrification: Training of staff, train drivers and contractors for working within an electrified environment, agreement on responsibility for maintaining electrification assets, agreement on safety provisions for public and contractors, communications with the public and other stakeholders. -
Stagecoach Group Plc – Preliminary Results for the Year Ended 30 April 2007
10 Dunkeld Road T +44 (0) 1738 442111 Perth F +44 (0) 1738 643648 PH1 5TW Scotland stagecoachgroup.com 27 June 2007 Stagecoach Group plc – Preliminary results for the year ended 30 April 2007 Business highlights • Delivering excellent performance and value to shareholders o Continued growth in earnings per share+ - up 10.4% o Underlying revenue growth in all core divisions o Around £700m in value returned to shareholders in May/June 2007 o Dividend increased by 10.8% • Partnerships and innovation driving growth at UK Bus o Continued organic passenger growth – like-for-like volumes up 6.6% o Strong revenue growth– like-for-like revenue up 10.3% o Like-for-like operating profit up 26.9% o Strong marketing, competitive fares strategy and concessionary travel schemes underpin growth o Named UK Bus Operator of the Year • Excellent performance in UK Rail o Strong start to new South Western rail franchise o Revenue up 12.8% o Contract wins: East Midlands; Manchester Metrolink • Strong growth in North America o Operating margin up from 7.1% to 7.9%, excluding Megabus o Continued strong revenue growth in both scheduled services and leisure markets – constant currency like-for-like revenue up 9.1% o Expansion of budget inter-city coach service, megabus.com, in United States • Growth at Virgin Rail Group o Continued revenue growth on West Coast and CrossCountry franchises o Winning market share from airlines o Good prospects for re-negotiated West Coast franchise • Stagecoach Group Board appointment o Appointment of Garry Watts as non-executive