DOCSLIB.ORG

Tectonic Setting Seismic Hazard Epicentral Region Finite Fault Model for M6.8 Earthquake Sea of Japan Pacific Ocean Did You Feel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tectonic Setting Seismic Hazard Epicentral Region Finite Fault Model for M6.8 Earthquake Sea of Japan Pacific Ocean Did You Feel U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR EARTHQUAKE SUMMARY MAP XXX U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with the Global Seismographic M6.9 Northern Honshu, Japan Earthquake of 13 June 2008 Network Tectonic Setting Epicentral Region 130° 140° 150° 160° 136° 138° 140° 142° 144° Blagoveshchensk SAPPORO YUBARI Hokkaido 1993 OKHOTSK IWANAI KURIYAMA 50° 50° KUSHIRO 1961 PLATE 1993 KUTCHAN Sapporo SHIRANUKA CHITOSE H 1943 C Birobidzhan N E Hokkaido Khabarovsk R TOMAKOMAI T A 1952 K DATE Qiqihar T CHINA Yuzhno- s A 1952 Sakhalinsk d H MURORAN i n n C s M a a A 1952 B l K s i l I - r 1915 u l L K i I r R AMUR PLATEHarbin u U K K 42° 42° HAKODATE EXPLANATION Changchun 1968 Jilin J a p a n 2003 Vladivostok B a s i n Sapporo Main Shock M6.8 1971 1945 Fushun Ch'ongjin J a p a n B a s i n Shenyang Mag ≥ 7.0 1968 Anshan Kanggye Aomori 1913 1919 0 - 69 km 1968 1917 Sinuiju Hamhung NOHEJI 1974 40° 40°70 - 299 N o r t h w e s t AJIGASAWA Aomori Dalian AOMORI N O R T H P a c i f i c 300 - 600 S e a o f J a p a n 1901 P'yongyang K O R E A S E A O F J A PA N HIROSAKI Sambongi H 1901 1994 Haeju Sendai C B a s i n 1983 HACHINOHE Kaesong N 1931 1935 Seoul E Plate Boundaries Ch'unch'on R T 1935 Inch`on Subduction ODATE 1995 S O U T H N Ch'ungju e NOSHIRO K O R E A A Qingdao P s i Taejon A Transform J A P A N J R Chonju Gifu Tokyo 1989 Taegu Kyoto y 40° 1968 40° Y E L L O W Pusan Kawasaki k 1939 Tohoku 1960 Yokohama s Divergent Kwangju Hiroshima Kobe Nagoya t S E A a AKITA 1917 DATA SOURCES Fukuoka Osaka h MORIOKA Cheju Matsuyama S MIYAKO 1928 Shimonoseki I Z Convergent 1914 1968 Nagasaki Kita U EPICENTRAL REGION EARTHQUAKES AND SEISMIC HAZARD Kyushu T HANAMAKI R Volcanoes E KAMAISHI 1933 USGS, National Earthquake Information Center Shanghai N C H PACIFIC PLATE NOAA, National Geophysical Data Center C H MIZUSAWA Hangzhou N E 1904 1915 1901 1902 IASPEI, Centennial Catalog (1900 - 1999) and R 30° T 30° SAKATA ICHINOSEKI E A S T ) extensions (Engdahl and Villaseñor, 2002) U Y Shinjo HDF (unpublished earthquake catalog) (Engdahl, 2003) C H I N A K TSURUOKA 1900 1981 U 1939 Y S E A R SANUMA Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program ( OKINAWA O PLATE 1964 FURUKAWA T 1937 O WAKUYA Naha H 1915 PLATE TECTONICS AND FAULT MODEL S 1933 SHIOGAMA ISHINOMAKI - Murakami I SENDAI PB2002 (Bird, 2003) E YAMAGATA 1936 Taipei S Sendai N Finite Fault Model, Chen Ji, UC Santa Barbara (2007) A 1978 1962 1915 N 130° 140° 150° 160° 38° NIIGATA SHIBATA YONEZAWA 1927 38° KAMEDA Scale MAKI BASE MAP RELATIVE PLATE MOTIONS 1:20,000,000 NIITSU FUKUSAIMA 1915 Kilometers Kamo Gosen NIMA and ESRI, Digital Chart of the World SANJO 1959 0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600 WAKAMATSU USGS, EROS Data Center Plate boundary symbols indicate the NAGAOKA 1905 H general pattern of relative plate motion. KASHIWAZAKI KORIYAMA C NOAA GEBCO and GLOBE Elevation Models 1938 N The Pacific Plate, however, is moving 1908 E R west-northwest relative to the Okhotsk TOGI TAKADA Shirakawa T NANAO TAIRA 1938 Plate at approximately 8.3 cm/yr. N ONAHAMA A UEDA 1938 1938 P HIMI Liyama REFERENCES UOZU A TAKAMATSU FUSHIKI Nikko 1938 J Did You Feel It? ISURUGI TAKAOKA NAGANO Numata KARASUYAMA FUKUNO TOYAMA Bird, P., 2003, An updated digital model of plate boundaries: 1948 KANAZAWA SUZAKA Kanto UTSUNMIYA Omachi MATSUSHIRO HITACHI 1938 KUJI Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., v. 4, no. 3, pp. 1027- 80. Seismic Hazard KOMATSU UEDA MAEBASHI KIRYU Kasama 1965 FUNATSU ASHIKAGA 130° 140° 150° 160° KARUIZAWA P a c i f i c O c e a n FURUKAWA MATSUMOTO ISEZAKI SHIMODATE 1982 Tomioka TAKASAKI 1924 Engdahl, E.R. and Villaseñor, A., 2002, Global Seismicity: TAKAYAWA OKAYO KOGA Ishioka FUKUI KUMAGAYA Blagoveshchensk SUWA 1900 - 1999, chap. 41 of Lee, W.H.K., and others,eds., 36° SABAE Chubu Chino KAWAGOE NODA 1921 1923 36° 50° 50° TAKEFU OMIYA International Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, HANNO Ryugaski HACHIMAN OMIGAWA AKAHO ENZAN ICHIKAWA 1923 Part A: New York, N.Y., Elsevier Academeic Press, 932 p. AMINO KOFU Tokyo TAKO CHOSHI Birobidzhan HACHIOJI SAKURA NARUTO IWATAKI Mino AOYAGI Asahi Honshu Earthquake Khabarovsk KINOMOTO IIDA 1924 TOKYO CHIBA Miyazu OI FUJI- Yokohama Yokaichiba Engdahl, E.R., Van der Hilst, R.D., and Buland, R.P., 1998, HIGASHI- GIFU SEKI YOSHIDA KATAKAI Gifu TAJIMI 1923 13 June 2008 23:42:46 UTC Qiqihar Yuzhno- MAIZURUMAIZURU HIKONE OGAKI 1923 MOBARA Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved trav- OKOSHI KISARAZU Sakhalinsk FUKUCHIYAMA ECHIGAWA FUJINOMIYA HIRATSUKA FUJISAWA OHARA el times and procedures for depth determination: Bull. Seism. KATADA SETO YOKOSUKA SASAYAMA NAGOYA TOYOTA YOSHIWARAODAWARA 39.122° N., 140.678° E. KUSATSU NUMAZU Kamogawa Soc. Amer., v. 88, p. 722-743. Nagoya KARIYA SHIMIZU MISHIMA Misaki CHIKURA Depth 10 km Kyoto KYOTO HINO ATAMI 1923 Harbin Sanda YOKKAICHI FUJIEDA SHIZUOKA ITO1923 OTSU HANDA TATEYAMA Mw = 6.9 (USGS) MIKI IKEDA TOYONAKASeki OKAZAKI KAKEOAWA YAIZU TOKONAME NISHIO MATSUZAKI AKUTAGAWA TOYOHASHI SHIMADA 1923 Osaka UENO TSU ARAI KOKUBU HAMAMATSU 1974 An earthquake occurred about 85 km (50 miles) SSE KOBE NARA TOYOHAMA 1909 AKASHI OSAKA MATSUZAKA of Akita, Honshu, Japan or about 100 km (60 miles) Changchun SAKURAI 1916 1909 NAGANO ISE NNW of Sendai, Honshu, Japan or about 390 km (240 Jilin FUKE KISHIWADA Vladivostok Sapporo IZUMI- Hashimoto Kinki miles) N of TOKYO, Japan at 5:43 PM MDT, Jun 13, SANO KOYASAN 2008 (Jun 14 at 8:43 AM local time in Japan). WAKAYAMA Owase 1906 1906 1953 Shenyang Fushun Ch'ongjin KAINAN Shaking was felt over a wide region. Ten deaths Finite Fault Model 34° Gobo and 236 injuries were reported. 34° Anshan Kanggye Aomori EXPLANATION 1944 TANABE 1984 for M6.8 Earthquake Sinuiju Hamhung SHINGU 40° 40° Earthquake Magnitude Dalian P'yongyang 5.50 - 5.99 136° 138° 140° 142° 144° Wonsan Sendai FINITE FAULT MODEL Haeju 6.00 - 6.99 Scale 1:4,000,000 Kaesong Seoul Contributed by Kilometers 3 Ch'unch'on 7.00 - 7.99 Gavin Hayes, NEIC and Chen 2 Inch`on 0 100 200 400 Significant Earthquakes Mag >= 7.5 Ch'ungju Taejon Ji, University of California at Chonju Tokyo 8.00 - 8.99 Santa Barbara Taegu Gifu Year Mon Day Time Lat Long Dep Mag Kwangju Kyoto Kawasaki 1896 08 31 1706 39.500 140.700 0 7.2 Pusan Nagoya Yokohama TECTONIC SUMMARY Hiroshima Osaka Kobe 9.00 - 9.99 1901 08 09 1833 40.600 142.300 35 7.5 Distribution of the amplitude Shimonoseki Matsuyama 1906 01 21 1349 34.000 137.000 350 7.7 and direction of slip for Cheju Fukuoka Kita The Mw 6.9 Honshu earthquake of June 13th 1909 03 13 1429 34.500 141.500 35 7.6 subfault elements (small Nagasaki Kyushu Earthquake Depth ) Slip (cm) EPICENTRAL REGION rectangles) of the fault rupture 2008 occurred in a region of convergence 1915 11 01 0724 38.300 142.900 35 7.5 m k 0 - 69 ( between the Pacific Plate and the Okhotsk 1923 09 01 0258 35.405 139.084 35 7.9 model are determined from the 0 - 50 Shanghai ) inversion of teleseismic body W 70 - 299 section of the North American Plate in northern 1923 09 02 0246 34.900 140.200 35 7.6 ° 50 - 100 1931 03 09 0348 40.484 142.664 35 7.7 waveforms. Arrows indicate 5 300 - 700 Japan, where the Pacific plate is moving west- 5 1 100 - 150 30° 30° 1933 03 02 1731 39.224 144.622 35 8.4 the amplitude and direction of northwest with respect to North America at a N ( 1938 05 23 0718 36.458 141.755 35 7.7 slip (of the hanging wall with 150 - 200 rate of approximately 8.3 cm/yr. The hypocenter 0 ° 1938 11 05 0843 37.009 142.045 35 7.9 respect to the foot wall); the 5 0 of the earthquake indicates shallow thrusting 2 200 - 250 1938 11 05 1050 37.108 142.081 35 7.8 slip amount is also color-coded e motion in the upper (Okhotsk) plate, above k 1938 11 06 0853 37.287 142.283 35 7.7 as shown. The view of the i r 250 - 300 t the subducting Pacific plate, which lies at 1944 12 07 0435 33.750 136.000 0 8.1 rupture plane is from above. s 130° 140° 150° 160° g 300 - 350 approximately 80 km depth at this location. 1952 03 04 0122 42.500 143.000 0 8.1 n Scale 1:20,000,000 lo Seismic hazard is expressed as peak 1953 11 25 1748 34.034 141.786 35 7.9 The strike of the fault rupture a 350 - 400 Kilometers ground acceleration (PGA) on firm 1960 03 20 1707 39.871 143.435 2.1 7.8 plane is N25E and the dip is 2 e 0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600 The earthquake occurred in a region of upper- 2 c - n 400 - 450 rock, in meters/sec², expected to be 1964 06 16 0401 38.434 139.226 13.1 7.5 a plate contraction, probably within the complicat- 49.67 NW.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Dangling Slab, Amplified Arc Volcanism, Mantle Flow and Seismic Anisotropy in the Kamchatka Plate Corner
    AGU Geodynamics Series Volume 30, PLATE BOUNDARY ZONES Edited by Seth Stein and Jeffrey T. Freymueller, p. 295-324 1 A Dangling Slab, Amplified Arc Volcanism, Mantle Flow and Seismic Anisotropy in the Kamchatka Plate Corner Jeffrey Park,1 Yadim Levin,1 Mark Brandon,1 Jonathan Lees,2 Valerie Peyton,3 Evgenii Gordeev ) 4 Alexei Ozerov ,4 Book chapter in press with "Plate Boundary Zones," edited by Seth Stein and Jeffrey Freymuller Abstract The Kamchatka peninsula in Russian East Asia lies at the junction of a transcurrent plate boundary, aligned with the western Aleutian Islands, and a steeply-dipping subduction zone with near-normal convergence. Seismicity patterns and P-wave tomography argue that subducting Pacific lithosphere terminates at the Aleutian junction, and that the downdip extension (>150km depth) of the slab edge is missing. Seismic observables of elastic anisotropy (SKS splitting and Love-Rayleigh scattering) are consistent \Vith asthenospheric strain that rotates from trench-parallel beneath the descending slab to trench-normal beyond its edge. Present-day arc volcanism is concentrated near the slab edge, in the Klyuchevskoy and Sheveluch eruptive centers. Loss of the downdip slab edge, whether from thermo-convective or ductile instability, and subsequent "slab-window" mantle return flow is indicated by widespread Quaternary volcanism in the Sredinny Range inland of Klyuchevskoy and Sheveluch, as well as the inferred Quaternary uplift of the central Kamchatka depression. The slab beneath Klyuchevskoy has shallower dip (35°) than the subduction zone farther south (55°) suggesting a transient lofting of the slab edge, either from asthenospheric flow or the loss of downdip load.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Frictional Properties on The
    Yamada et al. Earth, Planets and Space (2021) 73:18 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-01326-8 FULL PAPER Open Access Spatio-temporal characteristics of frictional properties on the subducting Pacifc Plate of the east of Tohoku district, Japan estimated from stress drops of small earthquakes Takuji Yamada1* , Meitong Duan2,3 and Jun Kawahara1 Abstract The east coast of the Tohoku district, Japan has a high seismicity, including aftershocks of the 2011 M9 Tohoku earth- quake. We analyzed 1142 earthquakes with 4.4 ≤ MW ≤ 5.0 that occurred in 2003 through 2018 and obtained spatio- temporal pattern of stress drop on the Pacifc Plate that subducts beneath the Okhotsk Plate. Here we show that small earthquakes at edges of a region with a large slip during the 2011 Tohoku earthquake had high values of stress drop, indicating that the areas had a high frictional strength and suppressed the coseismic slip of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. In addition, stress drops of small earthquakes in some of the areas likely decreased after the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. This indicates that the frictional strength decreased at the areas due to the following aftershocks of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, consistent with a high aftershock activity. This also supports that the frictional properties on a subducting plate interface can be monitored by stress drops of small earthquakes, as pointed out by some previous studies. Keywords: Frictional properties, Pacifc Plate, Stress drop, Spatio-temporal pattern, Small earthquake, East coast of the Tohoku district, 2011 Tohoku earthquake Background the east coast of the Tohoku district, Japan and found that Tectonics and characteristics of earthquakes of the east areas with a large coseismic displacement, where they coast of the Tohoku district, Japan refer to as asperities, distributed as stepping stones.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Marginal Basins of the NW Pacific and Their Plate Tectonic
    Earth-Science Reviews 130 (2014) 154–196 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Origin of marginal basins of the NW Pacificandtheirplate tectonic reconstructions Junyuan Xu a,⁎, Zvi Ben-Avraham b,TomKeltyc, Ho-Shing Yu d a Department of Petroleum Geology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China. b Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel c Department of Geological Sciences, California State University, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA d Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan article info abstract Article history: Geometry of basins can indicate their tectonic origin whether they are small or large. The basins of Bohai Gulf, Received 4 March 2013 South China Sea, East China Sea, Japan Sea, Andaman Sea, Okhotsk Sea and Bering Sea have typical geometry Accepted 3 October 2013 of dextral pull-apart. The Java, Makassar, Celebes and Sulu Seas basins together with grabens in Borneo also com- Available online 16 October 2013 prise a local dextral, transform-margin type basin system similar to the central and southern parts of the Shanxi Basin in geometry. The overall configuration of the Philippine Sea resembles a typical sinistral transpressional Keywords: “pop-up” structure. These marginal basins except the Philippine Sea basin generally have similar (or compatible) Marginal basins of the NW Pacific Dextral pull-apart rift history in the Cenozoic, but there do be some differences in the rifting history between major basins or their Sinistral transpressional pop-up sub-basins due to local differences in tectonic settings. Rifting kinematics of each of these marginal basins can be Uplift of Tibetan Plateau explained by dextral pull-apart or transtension.
    [Show full text]
  • Supercycle in Great Earthquake Recurrence Along the Japan Trench Over the Last 4000 Years Kazuko Usami1,5* , Ken Ikehara1, Toshiya Kanamatsu2 and Cecilia M
    Usami et al. Geosci. Lett. (2018) 5:11 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-018-0110-2 RESEARCH LETTER Open Access Supercycle in great earthquake recurrence along the Japan Trench over the last 4000 years Kazuko Usami1,5* , Ken Ikehara1, Toshiya Kanamatsu2 and Cecilia M. McHugh3,4 Abstract On the landward slope of the Japan Trench, the mid-slope terrace (MST) is located at a depth of 4000–6000 m. Two piston cores from the MST were analyzed to assess the applicability of the MST for turbidite paleoseismology and to fnd out reliable recurrence record of the great earthquakes along the Japan Trench. The cores have preserved records of ~ 12 seismo-turbidites (event deposits) during the last 4000 years. In the upper parts of the two cores, only the following earthquakes (magnitude M ~ 8 and larger) were clearly recorded: the 2011 Tohoku, the 1896 Sanriku, the 1454 Kyotoku, and the 869 Jogan earthquake. In the lower part of the cores, turbidites were deposited alternately in the northern and southern sites during the periods between concurrent depositional events occurring at intervals of 500–900 years. Considering the characteristics of the coring sites for their sensitivity to earthquake shaking, the con- current depositional events likely correspond to a supercycle that follows giant (M ~ 9) earthquakes along the Japan Trench. Preliminary estimations of peak ground acceleration for the historical earthquakes recorded as the turbidites imply that each rupture length of the 1454 and 869 earthquakes was over 200 km. The earthquakes related to the supercycle have occurred over at least the last 4000 years, and the cycle seems to have become slightly shorter in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Interplate and Intraplate Earthquakes
    ASSESSMENT OF INTERPLATE AND INTRAPLATE EARTHQUAKES A Thesis by SRIGIRI SHANKAR BELLAM Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August 2012 Major Subject: Construction Management Assessment of Interplate and Intraplate Earthquakes Copyright 2012 Srigiri Shankar Bellam ASSESSMENT OF INTERPLATE AND INTRAPLATE EARTHQUAKES A Thesis by SRIGIRI SHANKAR BELLAM Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved by: Chair of Committee, John M. Nichols Committee Members, Anne B. Nichols Douglas F. Wunneburger Leslie H. Feigenbaum Head of Department, Joseph P. Horlen August 2012 Major Subject: Construction Management iii ABSTRACT Assessment of Interplate and Intraplate Earthquakes. (August 2012) Srigiri Shankar Bellam, B. Tech, National Institute of Technology, India Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. John M. Nichols The earth was shown in the last century to have a surface layer composed of large plates. Plate tectonics is the study of the movement and stresses in the individual plates that make up the complete surface of the world’s sphere. Two types of earthquakes are observed in the surface plates, interplate and intraplate earthquakes, which are classified, based on the location of the origin of an earthquake either between two plates or within the plate respectively. Limited work has been completed on the definition of the boundary region between the plates from which interplate earthquakes originate, other than the recent work on the Mid Atlantic Ridge, defined at two degrees and the subsequent work to look at the applicability of this degree based definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Problem Set 2: Plate Motions
    Problem Set 2: Transforms INSTRUCTIONS: Answer the questions in bold. Turn in all your work. If you use a spreadsheet or matlab file, you submit those by email. Make sure to make your answers stand out from the calculations. You are free to work on the problems together, but written explanations must be individually done in your own words. Download GeoMapApp - available at geomapapp.org for any platform of your choice. Use the magnifying glass on the menu at the top of the map screen to zoom in to the Philippine Sea Plate. Conventions and definitions: For latitude, north is positive and south is negative For longitude, east is positive and west is negative ! angular velocity around some Euler pole vij linear velocity between plate i and plate j at location R r radius of the earth = 6371 km θ distance between R and Euler pole, measured in degrees or radians along the Earth's surface Relating the Euler pole to local velocity The angle θ between the Euler pole (Plat;Plon) and any other point on the earth's surface (Rlat;Rlon) is given by: θ = acos sin(Plat)sin(Rlat) + cos(Plat)cos(Rlat)cos(Plon − Rlon) (1) and the velocity between plates i and j is given by: jvijj = j!j jrj jsinθj (2) Calculating plate velocity and direction at other locations You can use your results for the previous sections to predict the plate motion in other parts of the plate boundary. cos(P )sin(P − R ) β = sin−1 lat lon lon (3) 1 sin(θ) −1 sin(Plat) − cos(θ)sin(Rlat) β2 = cos (4) sin(θ)cos(Rlat) ◦ If β1 and β2 have the same sign, then the azimuth of velocity at point R is 90 + β2.
    [Show full text]
  • Deformation of the Northwestern Okhotsk Plate: How Is It Happening?
    Stephan Mueller Spec. Publ. Ser., 4, 147–156, 2009 www.stephan-mueller-spec-publ-ser.net/4/147/2009/ Special © Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed under Publication the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Series Deformation of the Northwestern Okhotsk Plate: How is it happening? D. Hindle1, K. Fujita2, and K. Mackey2 1Albert-Ludwigs-Universitat¨ Freiburg, Geologisches Institut, Albertstr. 23b, 79104, Freiburg i. Br., Germany 2Dept. Geol. Sci., Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1115, USA Abstract. The Eurasia (EU) – North America (NA) plate the Central Chersky Range (Figs. 1 and 2) (Fujita et al., boundary zone across Northeast Asia still presents many 2009, this volume). As a result, a nutcracker type mo- open questions within the plate tectonic paradigm. Con- tion affects a roughly triangular shaped zone including the straining the geometry and number of plates or microplates Suntar-Khayata, Kukhtuy and Central Chersky Ranges and present in the plate boundary zone is especially difficult be- extending southwards to the northern coastline of the Sea of cause of the location of the EU-NA euler pole close to or Okhotsk (Figs. 1 and 2). It may also lead to varying degrees even upon the EU-NA boundary. One of the major chal- of “extrusion” of this region towards the south or southeast lenges remains the geometry of the Okhotsk plate (OK). as it is squeezed between the two giant plates. This segment whose northwestern portion terminates on the EU-OK-NA of the complex EU-NA plate boundary zone has often been triple junction and is thus caught and compressed between considered part of the Okhotsk plate (OK) (Cook et al., 1986; converging EU and NA.
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Precursor Seismicity Pattern Before Locked-Segment Rupture
    Universal precursor seismicity pattern before locked-segment rupture Hongran Chena, b, Siqing Qina, b, c, Lei Xuea, b, Baicun Yanga, b, c and Ke Zhang a, b, c aKey Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. bInnovation Academy for Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. cCollege of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. *Siqing Qin Email: [email protected] Keywords Precursor, locked segment, mechanical model, volume-expansion point, peak-stress point, characteristic earthquake Author Contributions S. Q. initiated the study. S. Q. and H. C. conceived the idea of this study. L. X., B. Y. and K. Z. analyzed the data. H. C. and L. X. interpreted the results. H. C. wrote the original manuscript. All authors discussed the results and revised the manuscript. This PDF file includes: Main Text Figures 1 to 6 Tables 1 to 2 1 Abstract Despite the enormous efforts towards searching for precursors, no precursors have exhibited real predictive power with respect to an earthquake thus far. Seismogenic locked segments that can accumulate adequate strain energy to cause major earthquakes are very heterogeneous and less brittle; progressive failures of the locked segments with these properties can produce an interesting seismic phenomenon: a characteristic earthquake and a sequence of smaller subsequent earthquakes (pre-shocks) always arise prior to another characteristic earthquake within a well-defined seismic zone and its current seismic period. Applying a mechanical model and magnitude constraint conditions, we show that two adjacent characteristic earthquakes reliably occur at the volume-expansion and peak-stress points of a locked segment.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Factors for Run-Up and Impact of the Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami
    International Journal of Geosciences, 2011, 2, 310-317 doi:10.4236/ijg.2011.23033 Published Online August 2011 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ijg) Critical Factors for Run-up and Impact of the Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami Efthymios Lekkas, Emmanouil Andreadakis*, Irene Kostaki, Eleni Kapourani School of Science, Department of Dynamic, Tectonic and Applied Geology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens,Greece E-mail: *[email protected] Received April 20, 2011; revised May 27, 2011; accepted July 7, 2011 Abstract The earthquake of March 11 of magnitude 9 offshore Tohoku, Japan, was followed by a tsunami wave with particularly destructive impact, over a coastal area extending approx. 850 km along the Pacific Coast of Honshu Island. First arrival times and measurements and maximum height were recorded by the Japanese monitoring system (wherever there was no failure of the equipment). The maximum run-up is well evident in satellite images available through USGS, Google and other institutes. Moreover, personal observations of Prof. Lekkas were made during a field survey in March 2011. The results of the study of the tsunami impact and run-up show the variety of factors affecting the run-up, creating zones with similar phenomena, but also specific locations where run-up exceeds by far the run-up zone maximum values. This differentiation, ob- served also in the past by other authors, is here attributed to the general orientation of the coast, the distance from the tsunami generation area, bathymetry offshore, the coastline morphology and land geomorphology. In certain cases that funnelling and reflection effects in narrow gulfs parallel to the tsunami propagation vec- tor were combined with narrow valleys onshore, peak run-up exceeded 20m, or even 40 m (Miyagi coastline, Ogatsu, Onagawa, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • A Grand Tour of the Ocean Basins by Declan G
    Transforms and fracture zones are introduced, also abandoned basins, convergent boundaries, and marginal basins. Instructors can easily change the sequence of stops to suit their courses using the Google Earth desktop app or by editing the KML file.Because large placemark balloons tend to obscure the Google Earth terrain behind them, you are advised to keep Google Earth and this PDF document open in separate windows, preferably on separate monitors or devices. Fig. 0 caption acknowledges all data and imagery sources. A Grand Tour of the Ocean Basins by Declan G. De Paor, [email protected] Welcome to the Grand Tour of the Ocean Basins! Use this document in association with the Google Earth tour which you can download from http://geode.net/GTOB/GTOB.kml Ocean floor ages are from http://nachon.free.fr/GE, based on Müller et al. (2008). See earthbyte.org/Resources/agegrid2008.html. Plate boundaries are from Laurel Goodell’s SERC web page: http://serc.carleton.edu/sp/library/google_earth/examples/ 49004.html based on Bird (2003) and programmed by Thomas Chust. Colors and line sizes were changed to improve visibility for persons with color vision deficiency, and I added other minor adjustments. The Tour Stops are arranged in a teaching sequence, Fig. 0. Plate Tectonics on Google Earth. ©2017 Google starting with continental rifting and incipient ocean basin Inc. Data SIO, NOAA, US Navy, NGA, USGS, GEBCO, formation in East Africa and the Red Sea and ending with NSF, LDEO, NOAA. Image Landsat/Copernicus, IBCAO, the oldest surviving fragments of oceanic crust. PGC, LDEO-Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • 3-D GIS Technique for Seismic Hazard Assessment of Subduction Zone Region
    Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2012 Conference, Dec 7-9 2012, Gold Coast, Qld 3-D GIS technique for seismic hazard assessment of subduction zone region 1 1 2 2 2 M. M. L.SO , T. I. MOTE , J. W. PAPPIN , V. S. Y. LAU , and I. P. H. YIM 1. Corresponding Author. Graduate Geologist, Arup, Level 10 201 Kent Street, Sydney, NSW 2000 Email: [email protected] 2. Associate, Arup, Level 10 201 Kent Street, Sydney, NSW 2000 Email: [email protected] 3. Arup Fellow, Arup, Level 5 Festival Walk, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong Email: [email protected] 4. GIS Analyst, Arup, Level 5 Festival Walk, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong Email: [email protected] 5. Assistant Geologist, Arup, Level 5 Festival Walk, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong Email: [email protected] Abstract Globally areas of highest seismicity are located at subduction zone interfaces between converging tectonic plates. To model the complex geometry of subduction zone seismic source zones, it is advantageous to develop a 3-D Geographical Information System (GIS) to visualise and characterise the plate boundary tectonic structures. The GIS supported the definition of the orientation and dip angle of the subducting plates and the depth distribution of the earthquakes. The system also enables a detailed extraction of earthquakes to support recurrence rate calculations in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment (PSHA). Japan and the Philippines are two countries straddling complex plate boundaries. Japan is situated at the junction of four plates; the Pacific Plate, the Philippine Sea Plate and the Amur Plate and the Okhotsk Plate, where subduction of the Pacific Plate underneath the Okhotsk Plate and the Philippine Sea Plate is occurring along the Japan Trough and the Izu-Bonin Trench respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Summaries of Magnitude 7 and Greater Earthquakes from 2000 to 2015
    Tectonic Summaries of Magnitude 7 and Greater Earthquakes from 2000 to 2015 Open-File Report 2016–1192 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Tectonic Summaries of Magnitude 7 and Greater Earthquakes from 2000 to 2015 By Gavin P. Hayes, Emma K. Myers, James W. Dewey, Richard W. Briggs, Paul S. Earle, Harley M. Benz, Gregory M. Smoczyk, Hanna E. Flamme, William D. Barnhart, Ryan D. Gold, and Kevin P. Furlong Open-File Report 2016–1192 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2017 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://store.usgs.gov/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Hayes, G.P., Myers, E.K., Dewey, J.W., Briggs, R.W., Earle, P.S., Benz, H.M., Smoczyk, G.M., Flamme, H.E., Barnhart, W.D., Gold, R.D., and Furlong, K.P., 2017, Tectonic summaries of magnitude 7 and greater earthquakes from 2000 to 2015: U.S.
    [Show full text]