Dr. Burleson CV
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Caltech/Mit Voting Technology Project
CALTECH/MIT VOTING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT A multi-disciplinary, collaborative project of the California Institute of Technology – Pasadena, California 91125 and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology – Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 TITLE Voting: What Has Changed, What Hasn’t, & Why Research Bibliography University Caltech University MIT Key words: VTP WORKING PAPER #108 January 8, 2013 Voting: What Has Changed, What Hasn’t, & Why Research Bibliography Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project January 8, 2013 2 Since the origins of the Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project in the fall of 2000, there has been an explosion of research and analysis on election administration and voting technology. As we worked throughout 2012 on our most recent study, Voting: What Has Changed, What Hasn’t, & What Needs Improvement, we found many more research studies. In this research bibliography, we present the research literature that we have found; future revisions of this research bibliography will update this list. We thank the Carnegie Corporation of New York for their support of this research effort. We also thank Gloria Bain and Jaclyn R. Kimble for their help compiling and editing this bibliography. Contents Books, Journal Articles, and Working Papers: pp. 1–68 Reports: pp. 69–81 Books, Articles, and Working Papers Abbink, Jon, and Wim Van Binsbergen. 2000. “International Election Observation: A Discussion on Policy and Practice.” In Election Observation and Democratization in Africa, eds. Gerti Hasseling and Jon Abbink. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 257-276. http://www.shikanda.net/publications/ASC-1239806-112.pdf Adida, Ben, and Ronald L. Rivest. 2006. “Scratch & Vote: Self-Contained Paper-Based Cryptographic Voting.” 5th AMC Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, 29-39. -
Caltech/Mit Voting Technology Project
CALTECH/MIT VOTING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT A multi-disciplinary, collaborative project of the California Institute of Technology – Pasadena, California 91125 and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology – Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 TESTIMONY ON VOTER VERIFICATION: PRESENTATION TO SENATE COMMITTEE ON RULES AND ADMINISTRATION Ted Selker MIT Key words: voter verification VTP WORKING PAPER # 31 June 2005 Testimony on voter verification To be presented to Senate Committee on Rules and Administration 301 Russell, Building 10:00 AM June 21st 2005 Trent Lott, Chairman Ted Selker MIT Chair of Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project * In the past five years, following the 2000 Florida election fiasco, the voting technologies used in the United States have undergone a significant change. The use of direct recording electronic (DRE) voting machines has increased and provided great opportunities for advances in accessibility and voting user interface design. Auditing steps of elections is important. Demonstrating that a computer program in a optical scan or DRE system is collecting them correctly must be done by testing and might be improved by redundant media created by separate means (electronic, or physical). One audit trail proposal is for the Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT). The VVPAT system adds a printer to a machine and adds an extra step to the end of the voting process when the voter prints out and approves a paper receipt of their vote. We have introduced the idea of a voter verified audio audit transcript trail (VVAATT). A VVAATT system adds audio feedback to the voting process. The audio feedback is recorded and the recording serves as an audit for the election. -
Research in Accessible Voting Report1
Research in Accessible Voting Report1 Final report for subcontract of Research Alliance for Accessible Voting: Creating audio, graphical, and physical technology, to address voting process and product. Ted Selker with Dan Gillette, Linda Avendano, Shama Hoque, Kate Liu, Minh Pham, and Mike Vroomen July, 2014 FIGURE 1 DAN GILLETTE, SHAMA HOQUE AND TED SELKER IN A PROTOTYPE REVIEW Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1. Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Projects:............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.2. Report structure ................................................................................................................................. 6 1.3. Staffing .............................................................................................................................................. 7 1.4. Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................... 7 2. Optical Magnifiers and Illuminators for Paper Voting Materials ................................................................ 8 2.1 Magnifier – Summary ......................................................................................................................