Simple Algebras, Base Change, and the Advanced Theory of the Trace Formula
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Prologue to “Functoriality and Reciprocity”, Part I
A Prologue to “Functoriality and Reciprocity”, Part I ÊÓb eÖØ ÄaÒgÐaÒd× In memoriam — Jonathan Rogawski Contents of Part I 1. Introduction. 2. The local theory over the real field. 3. The local theory over nonarchimedean fields. 4. The global theory for algebraic number fields. 5. Classical algebraic number theory. 6. Reciprocity. 7. The geometric theory for the group GL(1). 8.a. The geometric theory for a general group (provisional). Contents of Part II 8.b. The geometric theory for a general group (continued). 9. Gauge theory and the geometric theory. 10. The p-adic theory. 11. The problematics of motives. 1. Introduction. The first of my students who struggled seriously with the problems raised by the letter to Andr´eWeil of 1967 was Diana Shelstad in 1970/74, at Yale University and at the Institute for Advanced Study, who studied what we later called, at her suggestion and with the advice of Avner Ash, endoscopy, but for real groups. Although endoscopy for reductive groups over nonarchimedean fields was an issue from 1970 onwards, especially for SL(2), it took a decade to arrive at a clear and confident statement of one central issue, the fundamental lemma. This was given in my lectures at the Ecole´ normale sup´erieure des jeunes filles in Paris in the summer of 1980, although not in the form finally proved by Ngˆo, which is a statement that results from a sequence of reductions of the original statement. The theory of endoscopy is a theory for certain pairs (H, G) of reductive groups. A central H G H property of these pairs is a homomorphism φG : f f of the Hecke algebra for G(F ) to the Hecke algebra for H(F ), F a nonarchimedean local7→ field, and the fundamental lemma was an equality between certain orbital integrals for f G and stable orbital integrals for f H . -
The Role of the Ramanujan Conjecture in Analytic Number Theory
BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 50, Number 2, April 2013, Pages 267–320 S 0273-0979(2013)01404-6 Article electronically published on January 14, 2013 THE ROLE OF THE RAMANUJAN CONJECTURE IN ANALYTIC NUMBER THEORY VALENTIN BLOMER AND FARRELL BRUMLEY Dedicated to the 125th birthday of Srinivasa Ramanujan Abstract. We discuss progress towards the Ramanujan conjecture for the group GLn and its relation to various other topics in analytic number theory. Contents 1. Introduction 267 2. Background on Maaß forms 270 3. The Ramanujan conjecture for Maaß forms 276 4. The Ramanujan conjecture for GLn 283 5. Numerical improvements towards the Ramanujan conjecture and applications 290 6. L-functions 294 7. Techniques over Q 298 8. Techniques over number fields 302 9. Perspectives 305 J.-P. Serre’s 1981 letter to J.-M. Deshouillers 307 Acknowledgments 313 About the authors 313 References 313 1. Introduction In a remarkable article [111], published in 1916, Ramanujan considered the func- tion ∞ ∞ Δ(z)=(2π)12e2πiz (1 − e2πinz)24 =(2π)12 τ(n)e2πinz, n=1 n=1 where z ∈ H = {z ∈ C |z>0} is in the upper half-plane. The right hand side is understood as a definition for the arithmetic function τ(n) that nowadays bears Received by the editors June 8, 2012. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 11F70. Key words and phrases. Ramanujan conjecture, L-functions, number fields, non-vanishing, functoriality. The first author was supported by the Volkswagen Foundation and a Starting Grant of the European Research Council. The second author is partially supported by the ANR grant ArShiFo ANR-BLANC-114-2010 and by the Advanced Research Grant 228304 from the European Research Council. -
The I Nstitute L E T T E R
THE I NSTITUTE L E T T E R INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY · FALL 2004 ARNOLD LEVINE APPOINTED FACULTY MEMBER IN THE SCHOOL OF NATURAL SCIENCES he Institute for Advanced Study has announced the appointment of Arnold J. Professor in the Life Sciences until 1998. TLevine as professor of molecular biology in the School of Natural Sciences. Profes- He was on the faculty of the Biochemistry sor Levine was formerly a visiting professor in the School of Natural Sciences where he Department at Princeton University from established the Center for Systems Biology (see page 4). “We are delighted to welcome 1968 to 1979, when he became chair and to the Faculty of the Institute a scientist who has made such notable contributions to professor in the Department of Microbi- both basic and applied biological research. Under Professor Levine’s leadership, the ology at the State University of New York Center for Systems Biology will continue working in close collaboration with the Can- at Stony Brook, School of Medicine. cer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Lewis-Sigler Center The recipient of many honors, among for Integrative Genomics at Princeton University, and BioMaPS Institute at Rutgers, his most recent are: the Medal for Out- The State University of New Jersey, as well as such industrial partners as IBM, Siemens standing Contributions to Biomedical Corporate Research, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Merck & Co.,” commented Peter Research from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Goddard, Director of the Institute. Cancer Center (2000); the Keio Medical Arnold J. Levine’s research has centered on the causes of cancer in humans and ani- Science Prize of the Keio University mals. -
Pdf/P-Adic-Book.Pdf
BOOK REVIEWS BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 50, Number 4, October 2013, Pages 645–654 S 0273-0979(2013)01399-5 Article electronically published on January 17, 2013 Automorphic representations and L-functions for the general linear group. Volume I, by Dorian Goldfeld and Joseph Hundley, with exercises and a preface by Xan- der Faber, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Vol. 129, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011, xx+550 pp., ISBN 978-0-521-47423-8, US $105.00 Automorphic representations and L-functions for the general linear group. Volume II, by Dorian Goldfeld and Joseph Hundley, with exercises and a preface by Xan- der Faber, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Vol. 130, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011, xx+188 pp., ISBN 978-1-107-00794-4, US $82.00 1. Introduction One of the signs of the maturity of a subject, and oftentimes one of the causes of it, is the appearance of technical textbooks that are accessible to strong first- year graduate students. Such textbooks would have to make a careful selection of topics that are scattered in papers and research monographs and present them in a coherent fashion, occasionally replacing the natural historical order of the development of the subject by another order that is pedagogically sensible; this textbook would also have to unify the varying notations and definitions of various sources. For a field, like the theory of automorphic forms and representations, which despite its long history, is still in many ways in its infancy, writing a textbook that satisfies the demands listed above is a daunting task, and if done successfully its completion is a real achievement that will affect the development of the subject in the coming years and decades. -
Construction of Automorphic Galois Representations, II
Cambridge Journal of Mathematics Volume 1, Number 1, 53–73, 2013 Construction of automorphic Galois representations, II Gaetan¨ Chenevier∗ and Michael Harris In memory of Jon Rogawski Introduction Let F be a totally real field, K/F a totally imaginary quadratic extension, d =[F : Q], c ∈ Gal(K/F ) the non-trivial Galois automorphism. Let n be a positive integer and G = Gn be the algebraic group RK/QGL(n)K.The purpose of this article is to prove the existence of a compatible family of n- dimensional λ-adic representations ρλ,Π of the Galois group ΓK = Gal(K¯/K) attached to certain cuspidal automorphic representations Π of G.Hereisthe precise statement (see Theorem 3.2.3): Theorem. Fix a prime p and a pair of embeddings ι =(ιp : Q → Qp,ι∞ : Q → C). Let Π be a cuspidal automorphic representation of GL(n, K) that is cohomo- logical and conjugate self-dual in the sense of Hypotheses 1.1 below. Then there exists a semisimple continuous Galois representation ρι,Π :ΓK → GL(n, Q¯ p) associated to Π in the following sense: (a) For all finite primes v of K of residue characteristic prime to p, − − 1 n | F ss ≺L ⊗|•| 2 (ρι,Π Γv ) (Πv v ), ∗Financ´e par le C.N.R.S., partiellement soutenu par l’Agence Nationale de la Recherche, “ArShiFo ANR-BLAN-0114”. 53 54 Ga¨etan Chenevier and Michael Harris where Γv is a decomposition group at v, L is the local Langlands correspondence, the superscript F −ss denotes Frobenius semisimplifi- cation, and the relation ≺ is the partial ordering on the associated Weil-Deligne representations defined in [Ch] §3.1; K | (b) For all finite primes v of of residue characteristic p, ρι,Π Γv is de Rham (in Fontaine’s sense), and its Hodge-Tate numbers have mul- tiplicity at most one (i.e., ρι,Π is Hodge-Tate regular) and are deter- mined by the archimedean component Π∞ of Π in accordance with an explicit recipe. -
On Subquotients of the Étale Cohomology of Shimura Varieties
On subquotients of the ´etale cohomology of Shimura varieties Christian Johansson and Jack A. Thorne August 29, 2019 1 Introduction Let L be a number field, and let π be a cuspidal automorphic representation of GLn(AL). Suppose that π is L-algebraic and regular. By definition, this means that for each place v|∞ of L, the Langlands parameter φv : WLv → GLn(C) λ µ of πv has the property that, up to conjugation, φv|C× is of the form z 7→ z z for regular cocharacters λ, µ of the diagonal torus of GLn. In this case we can make, following [Clo90] and [BG14], the following conjecture: ∼ Conjecture 1.1. For any prime p and any isomorphism ι : Qp = C, there exists a continuous, semisimple representation rp,ι(π):ΓL → GLn(Qp) satisfying the following property: for all but finitely many finite places v of L such that πv is unramified, rp,ι(π)|ΓLv is unramified and the semisimple conjugacy class of −1 rp,ι(π)(Frobv) is equal to the Satake parameter of ι πv. (We note that this condition characterizes rp,ι(π) uniquely (up to isomorphism) if it exists, by the Chebotarev density theorem.) The condition that π is L-algebraic and regular implies that the Hecke eigenvalues of a twist of π appear in the cohomology of the arithmetic locally symmetric spaces attached to the group GLn,L. The first cases of Conjecture 1.1 to be proved were in the case n = 2 and L = Q, in which case these arithmetic locally symmetric spaces arise as complex points of Shimura varieties (in fact, modular curves), and the representations rp,ι(π) can be constructed directly as subquotients of the p-adic ´etale cohomology groups (see e.g. -
Purity of Equivalued Affine Springer Fibers
REPRESENTATION THEORY An Electronic Journal of the American Mathematical Society Volume 10, Pages 130–146 (February 20, 2006) S 1088-4165(06)00200-7 PURITY OF EQUIVALUED AFFINE SPRINGER FIBERS MARK GORESKY, ROBERT KOTTWITZ, AND ROBERT MACPHERSON Abstract. The affine Springer fiber corresponding to a regular integral equi- valued semisimple element admits a paving by vector bundles over Hessenberg varieties and hence its homology is “pure”. 1. Introduction 1.1. Overview. In [GKM04] the authors developed a geometric approach to the Oκ study of the “kappa” orbital integrals u(1k) that arise in the conjecture [L83] §III.1 of R. Langlands that is commonly referred to as the “fundamental lemma”. Oκ Theorem 15.8 of [GKM04] expresses u(1k) as the Grothendieck-Lefschetz trace of the action of Frobenius on the ´etale cohomology of the quotient Λ\Xu of a certain affine Springer fiber Xu by its lattice Λ of translations. (Precise definitions will follow below.) The authors also developed a procedure which, under three assumptions, gives an explicit formula for the ´etale cohomology of Λ\Xu. The three assumptions were: (1) the element u lies in an unramified torus, (2) the ´etale homology of Xu is pure, (3) equivariant ´etale homology satisfies certain formal properties analogous to those of equivariant singular homology. Assumption (2) was referred to as the “purity hypothesis” and it has also been adopted by G. Laumon [Lau] in a recent preprint. Under hypothesis (1) (the “unramified case”), a certain split torus S acts on the affine Springer fiber Xu. The purity assumption (2) implies that the homology of Xu is equivariantly formal with respect to the action of S. -
Introduction to the Langlands–Kottwitz Method
INTRODUCTION TO THE LANGLANDS–KOTTWITZ METHOD YIHANG ZHU 1. Introduction This chapter is a survey of Kottwitz’s two papers [Kot92] and [Kot90]. The first step towards under- standing the (étale) cohomology of Shimura varieties is to study the trace of a Hecke operator away from p composed with a power of the Frobenius at p, where p is a prime of good reduction. In the paper [Kot92], Kottwitz obtains a formula for this trace, for PEL Shimura varieties (which are assumed to be compact and not of type D). Kottwitz’s formula involves orbital integrals away from p and twisted orbital integrals at p. We shall refer to it as the unstabilized Langlands–Kottwitz formula. The shape of this formula is reminiscent of another formula, which stems from automorphic representation theory rather than Shimura varieties, namely the elliptic part of the Arthur–Selberg trace formula. In fact, the main idea of the so- called Langlands–Kottwitz method is that the Langlands–Kottwitz formula could be compared with the Arthur–Selberg trace formula, and the comparison should eventually reflect the reciprocity between Galois representations and automorphic representations. However, apart from very special situations, the unstabilized Langlands–Kottwitz formula is not directly comparable with the Arthur–Selberg trace formula. One has to stabilize both the formulas in order to com- pare them. Recall from [Har11] that the elliptic part of the Arthur–Selberg trace formula can be stabilized, in the sense that it can be rewritten in terms of stable orbital integrals on the endoscopic groups. In a similar sense, the unstabilized Langlands–Kottwitz formula could also be stabilized, and this is the main result of the paper [Kot90]. -
Codimensions of Root Valuation Strata
Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly Volume 5, Number 4 (Special Issue: In honor of John Tate, Part 1 of 2 ) 1253|1310, 2009 Codimensions of Root Valuation Strata Mark Goresky,1 Robert Kottwitz2 and Robert MacPherson Dedicated to John Tate. Abstract: The set of integral regular semisimple elements in g((²)) can be partitioned into strata, called root valuation strata, and the same is true of the adjoint quotient of g((²)). The main result of this paper is a formula for the codimensions of these root valuation strata in the adjoint quotient. Keywords: Adjoint quotient, root valuation strata, a±ne Springer ¯ber. 1. Introduction The topic of this paper arises naturally in the context of a±ne Springer ¯bers, which we now take a moment to discuss. Let G be a semisimple complex algebraic group, and let g denote its Lie algebra. We then have the a±ne Grassmannian X = G(F )=G(O), where O is the ring C[[²]] of formal power series, and F is its fraction ¯eld C((²)). For any u 2 g(F ) = g C F the closed subset u ¡1 X = fg 2 G(F )=G(O) : Ad(g) u 2 g(O) = g C Og of the a±ne Grassmannian, ¯rst studied by Kazhdan-Lusztig in [KL88], is called the a±ne Springer ¯ber associated to u. Received August 15, 2006. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classi¯cation. Primary 11F85; Secondary 20G25, 22E67. 1The author's research supported in part by NSF grant DMS-0139986 and DARPA grant HR0011- 04-1-0031. 2The author's research supported in part by NSF grants DMS-0071971 and DMS-0245639 1254 Mark Goresky, Robert Kottwitz and Robert MacPherson We now assume that u is regular semisimple and write Tu for its centralizer in G, a maximal torus of G over F . -
Clay Mathematics Institute 2005 James A
Contents Clay Mathematics Institute 2005 James A. Carlson Letter from the President 2 The Prize Problems The Millennium Prize Problems 3 Recognizing Achievement 2005 Clay Research Awards 4 CMI Researchers Summary of 2005 6 Workshops & Conferences CMI Programs & Research Activities Student Programs Collected Works James Arthur Archive 9 Raoul Bott Library CMI Profle Interview with Research Fellow 10 Maria Chudnovsky Feature Article Can Biology Lead to New Theorems? 13 by Bernd Sturmfels CMI Summer Schools Summary 14 Ricci Flow, 3–Manifolds, and Geometry 15 at MSRI Program Overview CMI Senior Scholars Program 17 Institute News Euclid and His Heritage Meeting 18 Appointments & Honors 20 CMI Publications Selected Articles by Research Fellows 27 Books & Videos 28 About CMI Profile of Bow Street Staff 30 CMI Activities 2006 Institute Calendar 32 2005 1 Euclid: www.claymath.org/euclid James Arthur Collected Works: www.claymath.org/cw/arthur Hanoi Institute of Mathematics: www.math.ac.vn Ramanujan Society: www.ramanujanmathsociety.org $.* $MBZ.BUIFNBUJDT*OTUJUVUF ".4 "NFSJDBO.BUIFNBUJDBM4PDJFUZ In addition to major,0O"VHVTU BUUIFTFDPOE*OUFSOBUJPOBM$POHSFTTPG.BUIFNBUJDJBOT ongoing activities such as JO1BSJT %BWJE)JMCFSUEFMJWFSFEIJTGBNPVTMFDUVSFJOXIJDIIFEFTDSJCFE the summer schools,UXFOUZUISFFQSPCMFNTUIBUXFSFUPQMBZBOJOnVFOUJBMSPMFJONBUIFNBUJDBM the Institute undertakes a 5IF.JMMFOOJVN1SJ[F1SPCMFNT SFTFBSDI"DFOUVSZMBUFS PO.BZ BUBNFFUJOHBUUIF$PMMÒHFEF number of smaller'SBODF UIF$MBZ.BUIFNBUJDT*OTUJUVUF $.* BOOPVODFEUIFDSFBUJPOPGB special projects