DOCSLIB.ORG

Texas's Redistricting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Texas's Redistricting UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) STATE OF TEXAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1303 ) (TBG-RMC-BAH) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) and ERIC H. HOLDER, in his ) official capacity as Attorney General ) of the United States ) ) Defendants, and ) ) Wendy Davis, et. al., ) ) Intervenor-Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Before: GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge, COLLYER and HOWELL, District Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH, in which District Judge HOWELL joins and District Judge COLLYER joins all except section III.A.3. Separate opinion for the Court with respect to retrogression in Congressional District 25 filed by District Judge HOWELL, in which District Judge COLLYER joins. Dissenting opinion with respect to retrogression in Congressional District 25 filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH. Appendix filed by District Judges COLLYER and HOWELL, in which Circuit Judge GRIFFITH joins. Opinion for the Court by GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge: Table of Contents I. Background.............................................................................................................................. 3 II. Principles of Section 5 Analysis ............................................................................................. 5 A. Retrogression ..................................................................................................................... 5 1. Texas’s Burden of Proof ............................................................................................. 7 2. Election Analysis Methodologies ............................................................................... 8 a. Types of Elections ....................................................................................................... 8 b. Election Analysis Sample Sets ................................................................................. 11 3. Statewide Retrogression Analysis ........................................................................... 13 4. Coalition and Crossover Districts ........................................................................... 18 a. Section 5 Analysis ..................................................................................................... 18 b. Standard of Proof ..................................................................................................... 22 B. Discriminatory Intent ..................................................................................................... 25 III. Congressional Plan .............................................................................................................. 27 A. Retrogression in the Congressional Plan ...................................................................... 27 1. Congressional District 27 ......................................................................................... 29 2. Congressional District 23 ......................................................................................... 29 3. Retrogression with New Congressional Seats ........................................................ 34 B. Discriminatory Intent in the Congressional Plan ........................................................ 38 IV. State Senate Plan ................................................................................................................. 43 A. Retrogression in the Senate Plan ................................................................................... 43 B. Discriminatory Intent in the Senate Plan ..................................................................... 45 V. State House Plan................................................................................................................... 51 A. Retrogression in the State House Plan .......................................................................... 51 1. Alleged Retrogressive Districts ................................................................................ 51 a. State House District 33 ............................................................................................. 51 b. State House District 35 ............................................................................................. 53 c. State House District 41 ............................................................................................. 55 d. State House District 117 ........................................................................................... 58 e. State House District 149 ........................................................................................... 60 f. State House Districts 26, 106, and 144 .................................................................... 66 2. Alleged New Ability Districts ................................................................................... 67 B. Discriminatory Intent in the State House Plan ............................................................ 70 VI. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 72 2 The latest Census reports that since 2000 the population of Texas grew by over four million. This dramatic increase required the Texas legislature to create new voting districts for the four seats added to the State’s congressional delegation, U.S. CONST. art. I, § 2, cl. 3; id. amend. XIV, § 2, and draw new boundaries for the state and congressional voting districts to comply with the mandate of one-person, one-vote, see Georgia v. Ashcroft, 539 U.S. 461, 488 n.2 (2003). Because Texas is a covered jurisdiction under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), 42 U.S.C. § 1973, the Attorney General of the United States or a three-judge panel of this Court must approve, or “preclear,” any redistricting plan before it can take effect. Id. § 1973c(a). Texas chose not to seek administrative preclearance and instead seeks from this Court a declaratory judgment that its redistricting plans will neither have “the purpose nor will have the effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race or color, or [language minority group].” Id. The United States opposes preclearance of the redistricting plans for Texas’s congressional delegation and the State House of Representatives, but has no quarrel with the plan for the Texas Senate. Seven Intervenors raise a variety of challenges that collectively encompass all three plans. We conclude that Texas has failed to show that any of the redistricting plans merits preclearance.1 I. Background On July 19, 2011, Texas filed a complaint in this Court seeking a declaratory judgment that its newly enacted redistricting plans for the U.S. House of Representatives (Plan C185 or 1 Texas sought declaratory judgment that the three plans comply with section 5 in counts two, three, and four of the complaint. In its first count, Texas also sought from this Court preclearance of its redistricting plan for the State Board of Education. No party objected to the plan, either in their written answers or during a conference call the Court held with the parties on September 21, 2011. With no opposition and satisfied that the State Board of Education plan complies with section 5, we granted preclearance for that plan on September 22, 2011. See Minute Entry Order, Sept. 22, 2011. 3 Congressional Plan), the Texas House of Representatives (Plan H283 or House Plan), and the Texas Senate (Plan S148 or Senate Plan) comply with section 5 of the VRA. This Court has been properly convened as a three-judge court, 28 U.S.C. § 2284; 42 U.S.C. § 1973c(a), and we took jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1973c and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(a)(2), 2201. After the United States and several Intervenors2 filed answers, Texas moved for summary judgment for all three plans on September 14, 2011. We heard argument on the motion on November 2, 2011, and issued an order denying summary judgment on November 8, 2011. Our memorandum opinion followed on December 22, 2011. The same three redistricting plans have been challenged under section 2 of the VRA before a three-judge district court in the Western District of Texas. The State’s population growth and the addition of four seats to its congressional delegation make it impossible for Texas to conduct elections using the district boundaries last approved under section 5. Our denial of Texas’s motion for summary judgment required the district court in the section 2 litigation to draw interim maps for the State’s fast-approaching primaries and the ensuing general election. After the Supreme Court invalidated those maps, see Perry v. Perez, 132 S. Ct. 934 (2012), the court issued a second set, which have not been challenged. See Feb. 28, 2012 Order, Perez v. Perry, No. 11-cv-360 (W.D. Tex. filed May 9, 2011), ECF No. 681 (Congressional Plan interim map); Feb. 28, 2012 Order, Perez, No. 11-cv-360, ECF No. 682 (House Plan interim map); Feb. 2 This Court has granted Defendant-Intervenor status to seven parties, each of whom challenges various aspects of some or all of Texas’s proposed plans in their capacities as individual voters, elected state representatives, or civil rights advocacy groups. The Davis Intervenors are Texas State senators and representatives from districts in the Fort Worth area. The Mexican American Legislative Caucus is a caucus in the Texas House of Representatives. The Gonzales Intervenors are a group of Hispanic and Black Texas voters. The Texas Legislative Black Caucus is composed of seventeen members of the Texas House of Representatives. The Texas Latino
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1030201895310PM.Pdf
    Dwight A. Boykins Houston City Council Member, District D October 29, 2018 Beth White President & CEO Houston Parks Board 300 North Post Oak Blvd. Houston, TX 77024 RE: Houston Parks Board / Houston Parks and Recreation Department submissions for H-GAC Call for Projects 2018 Dear Ms. White, I am pleased to send this letter in support of Houston Parks Board’s application for Transportation Improvement Project funding. As a City of Houston Council Member, I support uniting the city by developing a network of off-road shared use paths where residents can walk and bike safely. Expanding our network of greenways that reach jobs, education, and other services makes it easier for residents to rely on biking and walking to go about their daily lives. This reduces stress on people, on our roads, and on household budgets. The Beyond the Bayous Regional Connector Network of Greenways offers a vision to broaden the reach of Bayou Greenways 2020. Its inclusion in the 2045 Regional Transportation Plan will provide a roadmap for a comprehensive network of connected greenway trails throughout Harris County. The Port Connector Greenway project links the Port of Houston Turning Basin to Buffalo, Brays and Sims Bayou Greenways, and ultimately to Hobby Airport. It also creates a link to the west along Navigation, connecting to the trails at Buffalo Bayou Park East leading to downtown. These projects create neighborhood connections to existing parks, METRO lines, employment centers and residential areas in District D, and both are deserving. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me directly.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H4021
    May 14, 2003 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H4021 stand, especially those heroes from CELEBRATING FUNNY CIDE’S RUN ate and the Texas House, I know the south Texas: Kino Flores, Jim Solis, (Mr. STEARNS asked and was given value that the 53 Texas Democrats who Rene Oliveira, Aaron Pena, Miguel permission to address the House for 1 are in Ardmore, Oklahoma, today place Wise, Ryan Guillen and Juan Escobar. minute.) on the proud tradition of placing prin- We support them. Mr. STEARNS. Mr. Speaker, I rise to ciple above partisanship. When the Re- applaud the accomplishments of a man publican leader of the Texas House f from my hometown in Marion County, agreed to the political handiwork of Florida, the Sixth Congressional Dis- the majority leader of the U.S. House, ARMED FORCES DAY trict, because Tony Everard has been he abandoned a tradition that has (Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas asked training horses in Marion County for served Texas well. and was given permission to address over 35 years. When Texas House Republicans drew the House for 1 minute and to revise He purchased a remarkable horse, a a redistricting map without public and extend his remarks.) gelding, in 2001 in Saratoga, New York, hearings, behind closed doors, a map Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas. This and he trained it, but on May 3, this handed to them by Washington, they weekend is Armed Forces Day, and are horse became champion at the pinnacle trampled on a tradition in Texas, and not our men and women in uniform of horse racing, the Kentucky Derby.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas House of Representatives
    Texas House of Representatives September 9, 2013 Major General John F. Nichols Adjutant General of Texas National Guard of the United States Dear General Nichols, On September 3 the Department of Defense began including the same-gender spouses of American military personnel in spousal and family benefits offered through the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS). This action comes in response to the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision to overturn the federal Defense of Marriage Act on the grounds that the act wrote inequality into federal law and violated the Fifth Amendment’s protection of equal liberty. According to press reports, you have instructed facilities operated by Texas Military Forces to ignore the instruction of the Department of Defense and refuse to enroll the families of the men and women who risk their lives to serve this country. You stated, via memo, that to do so would conflict with the Texas Constitution’s and Family Code’s prohibition against the freedom to marry. In relying on your own interpretation of the law, and ignoring both federal law and the directions of the Department of Defense, Texas would join only Mississippi in this position. Seventeen other states with laws similar to Texas’ – including Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah and Wisconsin – have complied with the Department of Defense. You have directed members of the Texas National Guard who wish to enroll their same-gender spouses in the DEERS program to travel to one of the federally operated military installations in Texas, rather than allow them to simply enroll their families on the same campuses where they serve our state and country.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report to the 82Nd Texas Legislature
    InterIm report to the 82nd texas LegisLature House Committee on EnvironmEntal rEgulation December 2010 HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES INTERIM REPORT 2010 A REPORT TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 82ND TEXAS LEGISLATURE REPRESENTATIVE BYRON COOK CHAIRMAN COMMITTEE CLERK AMANDA FLORES Committee On Environmental Regulation December 6, 2010 Representative Byron Cook P.O. Box 2910 Chairman Austin, Texas 78768-2910 The Honorable Joe Straus Speaker, Texas House of Representatives Members of the Texas House of Representatives Texas State Capitol, Rm. 2W.13 Austin, Texas 78701 Dear Mr. Speaker and Fellow Members: The Committee on Environmental Regulation of the Eighty-first Legislature hereby submits its interim report for consideration by the Eighty-second Legislature. Respectfully submitted, _______________________ Representative Byron Cook _______________________ ______________________ ______________________ Warren Chisum, Vice Chairman Lon Burnam Jim Dunnam _______________________ ______________________ ______________________ Jessica Farrar Kelly Hancock Ken Legler _______________________ ______________________ Marc Veasey Randy Weber Warren Chisum Vice-Chairman Members: Lon Burnam, Jim Dunnam, Jessica Farrar, Kelly Hancock, Ken Legler, Marc Veasey and Randy Weber TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 9 INTERIM CHARGES .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hobby Fellows 2013
    Hobby Fellows 2013 The Hobby Center for Public Policy (HCPP) at the University of Houston (UH) serves the Houston region and the state of Texas with timely and objective research on key public policy issues. In addition to its research and graduate training, HCPP is dedicated to providing educational and leadership opportunities to the diverse UH undergraduate population through its public service internship programs. Introducing Hobby Fellows The majority of University of Houston students work while attending col- lege. Few UH students can pursue public service careers in Austin or Washington, D.C., because internships—the primary gateway to perma- nent jobs in these cities—are available only to students who can afford to live away from home. The Hobby Fellows program seeks to offer UH undergraduate students the opportunity to work as full-time state interns in our state capitol during Former Hobby Center interns Mirel Herrera, regular legislative sessions beginning in 2013. Hobby Fellows will earn a Debra Gonzales and Lesley Nelson at the monthly stipend, have guided academic assignments, regular site visits state capitol. They now work as legislative by HCPP faculty and staff, and perhaps most importantly, enter a fast- staff: Mirel in Washington; Debra in Austin; and Lesley in Houston. paced learning track to becoming a leader in public service. Additional benefits include the following: ▪ Encouraging academic achievements and community involvement; ▪ Polishing oral and written communication skills; STUDY ▪ SERVE ▪ SUCCEED ▪ Providing leadership training; Record of Success ▪ Developing a strong sense of civic responsibility; ▪ Fostering relationships with interns from other Texas universities; & The Hobby Center for Public Policy has ▪ Increasing the positive exposure of UH’s Tier One students in Austin.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives Jessica Farrar
    HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES P.O. BOX 2910 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78768-2910 COMMITTEES: (512) 463-0620 (512) 463-0894 FAX JUDICIARY & CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE VICE-CHAIR P.O. BOX 30099 JESSICA FARRAR STATE AFFAIRS HOUSTON, TEXAS 77249 DISTRICT 148 (713) 691-6912 (713) 691-3363 FAX J ESSICA .FARRAR @ HOUSE . TEXAS . GOV October 26, 2018 Beth White President & CEO Houston Parks Board 300 North Post Oak Blvd. Houston, TX 77024 RE: Houston Parks Board / Houston Parks and Recreation Department submissions for H-GAC Call for Projects 2018 Dear Ms. White, Please accept this letter in support of Houston Parks Board’s application for Transportation Improvement Project funding. I am in support of uniting the city by developing a network of off-road shared use paths where residents can walk and bike safely. Expanding our network of greenways that reach jobs, education, and other services make it easier for residents to rely on biking and walking to go about their daily lives. Alternative forms of transportation reduce stress on people, on our roads, and on household budgets. The projects identified below provide a vision for future linkages that connect five separate Bayou Greenways. I support these proposed projects: The Beyond the Bayous Regional Connector Network of Greenways offers a vision to broaden the reach of Bayou Greenways 2020. If included in the 2045 Regional Transportation Plan, the network will provide a roadmap for a comprehensive system of connected greenway trails throughout Harris County. The West Side/Westpark Connector Greenway project will provide safe bicycle/pedestrian access from Gulfton, the densest neighborhood in Houston, to two transit centers, seven high- frequency bus routes, and Brays Bayou Greenway.
    [Show full text]
  • Seizing the Momentum
    Seizing the Momentum Spring 2013 TCADP Advocates for Repeal of the Death Penalty at the 83rd Texas Legislature The Texas Legislature is now in the middle of its biennial, 140-day session, which means marathon floor debates and committee hearings (one recent hearing lasted until 4:30 AM!), amendments and deadlines, and increased competition for constituent voices to be heard. One of the thousands of pieces of legislation that has been filed this session calls for repeal of the death penalty in Texas – House Bill 1703, filed by Representative Jessica Farrar of District 148-Houston. This marks the fourth time that Rep. Farrar has filed such legislation. She is indeed a stalwart supporter for ending the use of capital punishment in our state. The TCADP Lobby Corps, a group of 15 volunteers, has been present in the Capitol each week since the legislative session began in January to meet and talk with legislators and to urge their support for HB 1703. Lobby Corps members, who hail from Austin, Dallas, Houston, Round Rock, and San Antonio, received special training for this role last fall, and each member is assigned as the TCADP liaison to specific legislative offices. Members are equipped with talking points and resources for these weekly visits, including the all-important Texas Legislative Handbook. Through the Lobby Corps, TCADP has greatly expanded its capacity to engage in dialogue with the 181 legislators who serve our state and provide them with information about recent death penalty developments in Texas. Some Lobby Corps members are political novices while others have worked on numerous campaigns.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Report Texas Fact Book 2008
    Texas Fact Book 2 0 0 8 L e g i s l a t i v e B u d g e t B o a r d LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD EIGHTIETH TEXAS LEGISLATURE 2007 – 2008 DAVID DEWHURST, JOINT CHAIR Lieutenant Governor TOM CRADDICK, JOINT CHAIR Representative District 82, Midland Speaker of the House of Representatives STEVE OGDEN Senatorial District 5, Bryan Chair, Senate Committee on Finance ROBERT DUNCAN Senatorial District 28, Lubbock JOHN WHITMIRE Senatorial District 15, Houston JUDITH ZAFFIRINI Senatorial District 21, Laredo WARREN CHISUM Representative District 88, Pampa Chair, House Committee on Appropriations JAMES KEFFER Representative District 60, Eastland Chair, House Committee on Ways and Means FRED HILL Representative District 112, Richardson SYLVESTER TURNER Representative District 139, Houston JOHN O’Brien, Director COVER PHOTO COURTESY OF SENATE MEDIA CONTENTS STATE GOVERNMENT STATEWIDE ELECTED OFFICIALS . 1 MEMBERS OF THE EIGHTIETH TEXAS LEGISLATURE . 3 The Senate . 3 The House of Representatives . 4 SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES . 8 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STANDING COMMITTEES . 10 BASIC STEPS IN THE TEXAS LEGISLATIVE PROCESS . 14 TEXAS AT A GLANCE GOVERNORS OF TEXAS . 15 HOW TEXAS RANKS Agriculture . 17 Crime and Law Enforcement . 17 Defense . 18 Economy . 18 Education . 18 Employment and Labor . 19 Environment and Energy . 19 Federal Government Finance . 20 Geography . 20 Health . 20 Housing . 21 Population . 21 Social Welfare . 22 State and Local Government Finance . 22 Technology . 23 Transportation . 23 Border Facts . 24 STATE HOLIDAYS, 2008 . 25 STATE SYMBOLS . 25 POPULATION Texas Population Compared with the U .s . 26 Texas and the U .s . Annual Population Growth Rates . 27 Resident Population, 15 Most Populous States .
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2006-07 Advocate
    TexasAdvocate State Teachers Association/National Education Association WINTER 2006-07 LivingLiving withwith AutismAutism A parent of an autistic child and an educator with autism tell what it’s like. Inside READING ROCKS Poster TSTA Takes 93% of House Races • 10 Inclusion Ideas • Energize Your Local PRESIDENT’S NOTES • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Caring Enough to Get Involved 2006 was a year of great contrast and challenges for Texas teachers and all Texans who care about our children’s education. With the November elections behind us now, a glance back at this tumultuous year shows that we succeeded and met those challenges because so many cared enough to get involved. In January, TSTA began planning for the upcoming election year in the context of a failed 2005 regular session followed by two failed special sessions that were marked by the shameless bashing of public schools and public school employees by certain state leaders, and especially those who controlled the Texas House. As we geared up for the March Pri- mary Election, we felt the frustration from those sessions carry over to the campaigns. More members were engaged and involved in campaigns than at any other time I could Just as our schools recall in a long personal history of political involvement. and our students Still, we all worried that millions of dollars from the Republican money machine of voucher succeed when we have advocate James Leininger, mega donor Bob Perry, and Texans for Lawsuit Reform would parents get involved overwhelm our efforts. in their education, It didn’t. The Chair of the House Public Education Committee, Kent Grusendorf, along with our involvement in three other hostile incumbents and four candidates backed by the extreme right were all the elections makes defeated.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H4018
    H4018 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE May 14, 2003 again, giving North Korea more assist- Tracy wrote: ‘‘Congress should ap- Mr. WELDON of Florida. Mr. Speak- ance to stop making nuclear weapons. prove the Unborn Victims of Violence er, I rise in strong support of legisla- This time we should not be intimi- Act. Opponents of the bill have put tion introduced by the gentlewoman dated into making concessions to a forth a counterproposal known as the from Pennsylvania (Ms. HART): H.R. rogue regime because they want to ex- Lofgren amendment. I have read it,’’ 1997, the Unborn Victims of Violence tract more assistance. Kim Jong Il uses she goes on to say, ‘‘and it is offensive Act. whatever money he can get to terrorize to me, because it says that there is The parents and family of Laci Peter- his people and threaten the security of only one victim in such a crime; the son have asked that the name of this the entire region. China, Japan, Rus- woman who is pregnant. bill be changed to Laci and Connor’s sia, and South Korea all should make ‘‘Please hear me on this: On the Law. I think for most Americans, this an effort to contain this rogue dictator night of February 8, 1992, there were is, shall we say, a no-brainer. People and help put an end to his blackmail two victims. I was nearly killed, but I are committing acts of violence games. survived. Little Zachariah died.’’ against pregnant women, and, unfortu- f Mr. Speaker, in a recent Fox News- nately, in some jurisdictions there is Opinion Dynamics poll, 84 percent said no way to prosecute in a situation TEXAS PATRIOTS that homicide charges are appropriate where there has been the death of the (Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H4176
    H4176 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE May 15, 2003 fight for their voice in shaping our gov- would break a quorum every time we ters for a living. Now he’s trying to ernment, comparing those brave Tex- disagreed with you on other important prove that he remembers how, by ex- ans to people such as Hussein’s Presi- issues of the day, such as our school fi- terminating any remnants of biparti- dential adviser, the King of Spades; nance, health care and homeowners in- sanship in the Texas House.’’ comparing them to the Republican surance. And continuing the quote, ‘‘Little Guard chief of staff, the Jack of Clubs; ‘‘We want to clarify this point so does DELAY, the U.S. House majority the Iraqi Intelligence Service, the Iraqi that your concern is addressed and no leader, care if he incites a blood feud in Armed Forces chief of staff, a jack of ambiguity remains. We are here be- Austin; he’d just as soon suck the Spades; the Secretary of the Repub- cause we strongly feel that congres- Democrats dry in his lust to make him- lican Guard and Special Republican sional redistricting should only be self master of the universe. In his insa- Guard, along with other Iraqi terror- taken up every 10 years, unless other- tiable ambition to obliterate the two- ists who have been responsible for the wise ordered to do so by the courts, and party system, DELAY apparently ex- death and murder and rape of hundreds that it should not be a priority above pected the Texas House Dems to roll of thousands of Iraqi citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • TEXAS OFFICES April 7, 2015 Via Electronic Mail
    TEXAS OFFICES AUSTIN REGION 3305 Northland Drive, Suite 310 Austin, Texas 78731 P (512) 249 –7960 F (512) 249-1661 [email protected] RENEE LAFAIR Regional Director April 7, 2015 ROBYN SPERLING Chair, Regional Board JARED LINDAUER Via Electronic Mail – [email protected] ADAM NAGORSKI Co-Chairs, Civil Rights Committee Representative Byron Cook Chairman, House Committee on State Affairs NORTH TEXAS/OKLAHOMA REGION 12800 Hillcrest Road, Suite 219 Dallas, Texas 75230 Re: Opposition to HB 4105 P (972) 960-0342 - F (972) 960-0591 [email protected] ROBERTA S. CLARK Dear Chairman Cook: Regional Director JEFFREY S. LEVINGER Chair, Regional Board On behalf of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), we urge the House Committee on State Affairs to BRAD ALTMAN oppose House Bill 4105 when it is heard by Committee on April 8, 2015. HOWARD SHAPIRO Co-Chairs, Civil Rights Committee ADL is committed to ensuring that all Americans are afforded equal treatment under the law. As an SOUTHWEST REGION organization that combats anti-Semitism, bigotry, and discrimination of all kinds, ADL has been in the 4635 Southwest Freeway, Suite 400 Houston, Texas 77027 forefront of efforts to secure equal rights for LGBT persons, including efforts to secure equal rights for P (713) 627-3490 - F (713) 627-2011 same-sex marriages. [email protected] MARTIN B. COMINSKY Regional Director As the country waits for a Supreme Court ruling on the right to marry later this year, HB 4105 attempts IAN SCHARFMAN Chair, Regional Board to force state and local government officials to either ignore or subvert any ruling in favor of the MARK TRACHTENBERG freedom to marry by making it illegal for state and local employees to “recognize, grants, or enforce a Chair, Civil Rights Committee same-sex marriage license.” PHYLLIS COHEN Chair, Government Affairs ADL is an ardent supporter of religious liberties, but HB 4105 is not necessary to protect religious JEAN & JERRY MOORE freedom.
    [Show full text]