DOCSLIB.ORG

Final - Bitterroot Watershed Total Maximum Daily Loads and Water Quality Improvement Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final - Bitterroot Watershed Total Maximum Daily Loads and Water Quality Improvement Plan Final - Bitterroot Watershed Total Maximum Daily Loads and Water Quality Improvement Plan December 2014 Steve Bullock, Governor Tracy Stone-Manning, Director DEQ Document Number C05-TMDL-04aF Prepared by: Water Quality Planning Bureau Watershed Management Section Contributors: Water Quality Planning Bureau Watershed Management Section Mindy McCarthy, Nutrients Project Manager Christian Schmidt, Previous Nutrients Project Manager Jordan Tollefson, Project Coordinator and Temperature Project Manager Information Management and Technical Services Section Kyle Flynn, Project Modeler Mike Van Liew, Previous Modeler U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Peter Brumm, Metals Project Manager Montana Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality Planning Bureau 1520 E. Sixth Avenue P.O. Box 200901 Helena, MT 59620-0901 Suggested citation: Montana DEQ and U.S. EPA Region 8. 2014. Bitterroot Watershed Total Maximum Daily Loads and Water Quality Improvement Plan. Helena, MT: Montana Dept. of Environmental Quality. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS DEQ would like to acknowledge multiple entities for their contributions in the development of the TMDLs contained in this document. This project was a joint effort with the Montana Office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). DEQ would like to thank the EPA staff that contributed to the completion of this project. Peter Brumm was a vital member of this project, serving as the project manager for the metals TMDLs in Section 6.0 and authoring Section 2.0, the Bitterroot Watershed Project Area Description, as well as creating all maps contained in Appendix A. DEQ would also like to thank Jessica Clarke with our Monitoring and Assessment Section who conducted water quality monitoring in support of the metals and nutrients TMDLs; and Carrie Greeley, an administrative assistant, for her time and effort formatting this document. A consulting firm, Tetra Tech, Inc., provided support with temperature field data collection, data analysis, and modeling for Mill Creek, and authored Section 7.0 in the document, as well as authored Attachment A, Modeling Water Temperature in Mill Creek. DEQ would also like to thank the Bitterroot Water Forum and Gil Gale from the Bitterroot National Forest for their input and assistance throughout development of these TMDLs. Draft versions of source assessment reports and this document were sent to stakeholders for review and input. The involvement of all reviewers led to improvements in this document and is greatly appreciated. Bitterroot Watershed Total Maximum Daily Loads and Water Quality Improvement Plan – Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronym List ................................................................................................................................................ xi Document Summary ............................................................................................................................... DS-1 1.0 Project Overview .................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Why We Write TMDLs ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Water Quality Impairments and TMDLs Addressed by this Document ........................................... 1-2 1.3 What This Document Contains ........................................................................................................ 1-6 2.0 Bitterroot Watershed Project Area Description .................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Physical Characteristics .................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Location ..................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Topography ............................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.3 Geology ..................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.4 Soil ............................................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.1.5 Surface Water ........................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.6 Groundwater ............................................................................................................................. 2-4 2.1.7 Climate ...................................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.2 Ecological Characteristics ................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.1 Ecoregion .................................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.2 Fire ............................................................................................................................................ 2-6 2.2.3 Aquatic and Terrestrial Life ....................................................................................................... 2-7 2.3 Cultural Characteristics .................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.3.1 Population ................................................................................................................................. 2-7 2.3.2 Transportation Networks .......................................................................................................... 2-8 2.3.3 Land Ownership ........................................................................................................................ 2-8 2.3.4 Land Cover and Use .................................................................................................................. 2-9 2.3.5 Point Sources .......................................................................................................................... 2-10 3.0 Montana Water Quality Standards ...................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Stream Classifications and Designated Beneficial Uses ................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Numeric and Narrative Water Quality Standards ............................................................................ 3-3 4.0 Defining TMDLs and Their Components .............................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Developing Water Quality Targets ................................................................................................... 4-2 4.2 Quantifying Pollutant Sources ......................................................................................................... 4-2 4.3 Establishing the Total Allowable Load ............................................................................................. 4-3 4.4 Determining Pollutant Allocations ................................................................................................... 4-3 12/3/2014 Final i Bitterroot Watershed Total Maximum Daily Loads and Water Quality Improvement Plan – Table of Contents 4.5 Implementing TMDL Allocations ...................................................................................................... 4-5 5.0 Nutrient TMDL Components ................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.1 Nutrient Effects on Beneficial Uses .................................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Stream Segments of Concern .......................................................................................................... 5-1 5.3 Water Quality Assessment Method and Information Sources ........................................................ 5-3 5.4 Water Quality Targets ...................................................................................................................... 5-4 5.4.1 Nutrient Water Quality Standards ............................................................................................ 5-4 5.4.2 Nutrient Target Values .............................................................................................................. 5-4 5.4.3 Existing Conditions and Comparison to Targets ....................................................................... 5-7 5.4.4 Nutrient TMDL Development Summary ................................................................................. 5-18 5.5 Source Assessment, TMDL, and Allocation Approaches ................................................................ 5-19 5.5.1 Source Assessment Approach ................................................................................................. 5-19 5.5.2 TMDL and Allocation Approach .............................................................................................. 5-23 5.6 Source Assessments, TMDLs, and Allocations for Each Stream..................................................... 5-26 5.6.1 Threemile Creek .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flower Power
    FLOWER POWER IDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN WHAT IS A FLOWER? INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVE: When students finish this project, they will have gained respect for the beauty of flowers and appreciate their ecological and practical importance. INTRODUCTION Dear Teacher, The Idaho Botanical Garden is an outdoor learning environment. We want to make your visit comfortable and enjoyable, and ask that your students are dressed appropriately for the weather and have water, especially in the warm weather months. TERMS Angiosperms: Flowering plants that produce seeds enclosed in a fruit. Anthers: The boxlike structures at the top of stamens, where pollen is produced. Botanical garden: A place where plants are collected and displayed for scientific, educational and artistic purposes. Fertilization: The union of male sperm cells and female egg cells. Filament: The stalk of the stamen. Flower: The reproductive structure of an angiosperm. Fruit: A ripened ovary conaining seeds. Nectar: The sweet liquid produced by flowers to attract pollinators. Ovary: The hollow compartment at the base of the pistil which contains ovules. It develops into a fruit containing seeds. Ovules: The structures in a flower ovary that can develop into seeds. Pistil: The female part of a flower; stigma, style, and ovary. Pollen: A yellow, powder-like material containing sperm cells. Pollen tubes: Tubes that carry sperm cells from the stigma into the ovary. Pollination: The process of pollen coming together with the stigma of a flower. Pollinators: Animals which carry pollen from one flower to another. Seed: A structure containing a baby plant and its food supply, which is surrounded by a protective seed coat.
    [Show full text]
  • Perennials for Special Purposes
    Perennials for Special Purposes Hot & Dry Areas • Sage, Perennial (Artemisia) Newly planted perennials will need regular • Sea Holly (Eryngium) watering until established. • Sea Lavender (Limonium) • Spurge, Cushion (Euphorbia • Aster polychroma) • Baby’s Breath • Statice, German (Gypsophila) (Goniolimon) • Beardtongue • Stonecrop (Sedum) (Penstemon) • Sunflower, False (Heliopsis) • Big Bluestem • Sunflower, Perennial (Helianthus) (Andropogon) • Switch Grass (Panicum) • Bitterroot (Lewisia) • Tickseed (Coreopsis) • Blanketflower (Gaillardia) • Tufted Hair Grass (Deschampsia) • Blue Oat Grass (Helictotrichon) • Yarrow (Achillea) • Cactus, Prickly Pear (Opuntia) • Yucca • Candytuft (Iberis sempervirens) • Cinquefoil (Potentilla) Groundcover for Sun • Coneflower (Echinacea) • Daisy, Painted (Tanacetum) • Baby’s Breath, Creeping • Daisy, Shasta (Leucanthemum x superbum) (Gypsophila repens) • Daylily (Hemerocallis) • Beardtongue, Spreading • Evening Primrose (Oenothera) (Penstemon) • False Indigo (Baptisia) • Bellflower, Spreading • Feather Reed Grass (Calamagrostis) (Campanula) • Fescue, Blue (Festuca glauca) • Cinquefoil (Potentilla) • Flax (Linum) • Cliff Green (Paxistima • Foxtail Lily (Eremurus) canbyi) • Globe Thistle (Echinops) • Cranesbill (Geranium) • Goldenrod (Solidago) • Gentian, Trumpet (Gentiana acaulis) • Helen’s Flower (Helenium) • Globe Daisy (Globularia) • Hens & Chicks (Sempervivum) • Hens & Chicks (Sempervivum) • Ice Plant (Delosperma) • Irish/Scotch Moss (Sagina subulata) • Lamb’s Ears (Stachys byzantina) • Kinnikinnick
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Loads for Bacteria Impaired Waters in Ohio
    Division of Surface Water October 2020 Total Maximum Daily Loads for Bacteria Impaired Waters in Ohio The Clean Water Act requires Ohio EPA to prepare a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for watersheds that do not meet water quality goals. A TMDL report, specifies how much pollution must be reduced from various sources and recommends specific actions to achieve these reductions. TMDL Overview Under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act, states are required to list water bodies that do not meet water quality standards (as defined in Ohio Administrative Code Chapter 3745-1) and to develop total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) to address the impairment. A TMDL is a plan to restore good health to streams or other water bodies that are not meeting water quality goals. It serves as a roadmap for measures that can be taken to improve water quality. It defines how much pollution exists and identifies sources; specifies the amount of pollution reduction needed to meet water quality goals; and recommends actions that will improve water quality in the streams. Recreation Ohio is a water-rich state, providing many opportunities for recreation in and on its waters. The overall outcome of this TMDL project is to further the Clean Water Act’s “fishable/swimmable” goal. Water quality standards that pertain to recreation use are intended to protect the health of those using surface waters for swimming, boating, wading and other types of water-related activities. Ohio EPA uses the bacterium Escherichia coli (E. coli) as an indicator for the presence of pathogenic bacteria and viruses in a water body as a result of fecal contamination.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bitterroot Valley of Western Montana Area Economic Profile
    The Bitterroot Valley of Western Montana AREA ECONOMIC PROFILE prepared by Dr. Larry Swanson, Associate Directori O’Connor Center for the Rocky Mountain West The University of Montana May, 2001 This profile provides a description and assessment of the area economy of the Bitterroot Valley of southwestern Montana. Changing conditions and trends in the area economy over the course of the last twenty to twenty-five years are examined, including trends in population and employment growth and associated income changes and economic restruc- turing. Changing conditions in Ravalli County and the Bitterroot Valley are compared to those for the larger Rocky Mountain West region and nation as a whole. Various measures of the Bitterroot area economy also are systematically compared to similar measures for areas throughout the western United States having similar characteristics to the Bitterroot Valley. Two types of “peer areas” are selected for this purpose: 1) non-metro areas in the West nearby small and intermediate regional centers of 30,000 to 100,000 people, and, 2) non-metro areas nearby small and intermediate regional centers that are also nearby large concentrations of Forest Service lands. Major Findings and Observations Southwestern Montana’s Bitterroot Valley is the central watershed of the Bitterroot River, which flows north through the valley toward its confluence with the Clark Fork River near Missoula. This 1. Population Growth - During the 1990s, Ravalli County was the fastest growing county watershed is largely defined by the boundaries of Ravalli County. County boundaries also define in Montana and became one of the fastest growing counties in the entire United States, the outer boundaries of the Bitterroot National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • (Pollutant) Load (Tmdl) Approach for Managing Eutrophication in South African Dams
    A FEASIBILITY EVALUATION OF THE TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY (POLLUTANT) LOAD (TMDL) APPROACH FOR MANAGING EUTROPHICATION IN SOUTH AFRICAN DAMS Report to the WATER RESEARCH COMMISSION by Dr WR Harding DH Environmental Consulting (Pty) Ltd WRC Report No. 2245/1/15 ISBN 978-1-4312-0673-5 April 2015 Obtainable from Water Research Commission Private Bag X03 GEZINA, 0031 [email protected] or download from www.wrc.org.za DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. © Water Research Commission Roodeplaat Dam (Gauteng, South Africa) on 28 November 2014. With 62% of South Africa’s largest dams eutrophic or hypertrophic (Matthews 2014) the need for nutrient attenuation interventions is long overdue. Catchment-based audits of nutrient generation, such as the Total Mean Daily Load (TMDL) protocol provide a means of identifying and prioritizing load reductions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are (i) a calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards, and (ii) an allocation of that amount to the pollutant's individual sources. The TMDL protocol was developed in the USA in support of the Clean Water Act of 1972. TMDLs can be applied to any pollutant, inter alia bacterial, pathogens, suspended solids, sediments, trace metals and nutrients. The TMDL approach can be applied to both lentic and lotic waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding in the Missoula and Bitterroot Valleys
    Birding in the Missoula and Bitterroot Valleys Five Valleys and Bitterroot Audubon Society Chapters are grassroots volunteer organizations of Montana Audubon and the National Audubon Society. We promote understanding, respect, and enjoyment of birds and the natural world through education, habitat protection, and environmental advocacy. Five Valleys Bitterroot Audubon Society Audubon Society P.O. Box 8425 P.O. Box 326 Missoula, MT 59807 Hamilton, MT 59840 www.fvaudubon.org/ www.bitterrootaudubonorg/ Montana Audubon P.O. Box 595 Helena, MT 59624 406-443-3949 www.mtaudubon.org Status W Sp Su F Bird Species of West-central Montana (most vagrants excluded) _ Harlequin Duck B r r r Relative abundance in suitable habitat by season are: _ Long-tailed Duck t r r c - common to abundant, usually found on every visit in _ Surf Scoter t r r r moderate to large numbers _ White-winged Scoter t r r r u - uncommon, usually present in low numbers but may be _ Common Goldeneye B c c c c _ missed Barrow’s Goldeneye B u c c c _ o - occasional, seen only a few times during the season, not Bufflehead B o c u c _ Hooded Merganser B o c c c present in all suitable habitat _ Common Merganser B c c c c r - rare, one to low numbers occur but not every year _ Red-breasted Merganser t o o _ Status: Ruddy Duck B c c c _ Osprey B c c c B - Direct evidence of breeding _ Bald Eagle B c c c c b - Indirect evidence of breeding _ Northern Harrier B u c c c t - No evidence of breeding _ Sharp-shinned Hawk B u u u u _ Cooper’s Hawk B u u u u Season of occurrence: _ Northern Goshawk B u u u u W - Winter, mid-November to mid-February _ Swainson’s Hawk B u u u Sp - Spring, mid-February to mid-May _ Red-tailed Hawk B c c c c Su - Summer, mid-May to mid-August _ Ferruginous Hawk t r r r F - Fall, mid-August to mid-November _ Rough-legged Hawk t c c c _ Golden Eagle B u u u u This list follows the seventh edition of the AOU check-list.
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Wise and Native Plant Demonstration Garden
    LaBonte Park’s Outdoor Learning Center Water-Wise and Native Plant Demonstration Garden This collaborative effort was undertaken in fall 2007 to showcase the wide variety of water- wise plants that can be grown in Laramie. Most are also well-adapted to other locations in the state. These drought-tolerant species can be used in naturalistic settings or in more for- mal gardens. Either way, you’ll end up with a landscape that uses less water, takes up less of your time, and looks great! Updated 8/2012 N The north side of this garden is dedicated to plants that are native to our area including the Rocky Mountains and Great Plains re- gions. Note: This map will be revised every 2-3 years. It may not be to- tally accurate when you visit but it will be close. The south side con- tains water-wise plants from the Rocky Mountain region and beyond. Water-Wise Demo Bed List of Plants (listed by map number) PERENNIALS 84. Upright prairie coneflower (red-brown form) Ratibida columnifera 3. Wild four o'clock, Mirabilis multiflora 90. Sugarbowl clematis, Clematis scottii 4. Sunset penstemon, Penstemon clutei 93. Iris (intermediate size), Iris spp. 5. Basket of Gold, Aurinia saxatilis 94. Iris, Iris spp. 6. Lambs ear ('Silver Carpet'), Stachys byzantina 95. Firecracker penstemon, Penstemon eatonii 7. Dianthus ('Firewitch'), Dianthus gratianopolitanus 96. Partridge feather, Tanacetum densum ssp. 8. Rocky Mountain penstemon, Penstemon strictus amani 9. Small-leaf pussytoes ('McClintock'), Antennaria parvi- 97. Sedum (‘Angelina’), Sedum rupestre folia 98. Yarrow (‘Moonshine’), Achillea hybrid 10. Artemisia ('Silver Brocade'), Artemisia stelleriana 99.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut DEEP Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program Factsheet
    Connecticut DEEP Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program Factsheet Child Playing in Water Boats in Long Island Sound What is a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)? A TMDL is an Action Plan used to address pollution, kind of like a budget. Any waterbody that is overspending its daily budget for a substance is considered to be polluted or impaired. Any waterbody that is spending less than its daily budget for a substance has good water quality which should be protected. TMDLs provide the framework for restoring impaired waters by establishing the maximum amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive without adverse impact to fish, wildlife, recreation, or other uses. A TMDL can also be used to set a budget to protect waters with good water quality. Piece by piece To create a TMDL, the waterbody is cut into pieces known as segments. These segments are like pieces of a puzzle. Each piece is reviewed for available data and pollution levels. A budget is determined for each piece in order to restore or protect water quality. Reaching these goals allows for a waterbody to meet the planned budget. This will reduce pollution and improve water quality. Segment 1 Segment 2 Fix what is broken And protect what is not TMDLs are action plans that provide water quality targets for the waterbody and identifies sources of water pollution. As changes are made to achieve these targets in impaired waters and fixes are implemented, the result will be protection of natural resources and cleaner water. This provides better habitat for fish and safer recreation for people.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan And
    Glossary accessible—Pertaining to physical access to areas and canopy—A layer of foliage, generally the uppermost activities for people of different abilities, especially layer, in a vegetative stand; midlevel or understory those with physical impairments. vegetation in multilayered stands. Canopy closure adaptive resource management—The rigorous appli­ (also canopy cover) is an estimate of the amount of cation of management, research, and monitoring overhead vegetative cover. to gain information and experience necessary to CCP—See comprehensive conservation plan. assess and modify management activities. It is a CFR—See Code of Federal Regulations. process that uses feedback from research, moni­ cfs—Cubic feet per second. toring, and evaluation of management actions to Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)—The codification of support or modify objectives and strategies at all the general and permanent rules published in the planning levels. It is also a process in which policy Federal Register by the executive departments and decisions are implemented within a framework of agencies of the Federal Government. Each volume scientifically driven experiments to test predictions of the CFR is updated once each calendar year. and assumptions inherent in management plans. compatibility determination—See compatible use. Analysis of results helps managers determine compatible use—A wildlife-dependent recreational use whether current management should continue as or any other use of a refuge that, in the sound pro­ is or whether it should be modified to achieve de­ fessional judgment of the director of the U.S. Fish sired conditions. and Wildlife Service, will not materially interfere Administration Act—National Wildlife Refuge System with or detract from the fulfillment of the mission Administration Act of 1966.
    [Show full text]
  • Abandoned-Inactive Mines on Bitterroot National Forest-Administered Land
    Abandoned-Inactive Mines on Bitterroot National Forest-Administered Land Map of the Curlew Mine by Rick Schmidt in MBMG mineral property files Open-File Report MBMG 484 Phyllis A. Hargrave Catherine McDonald Michael D. Kerschen John J. Metesh Robert Wintergerst Prepared for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service-Region 1 Abandoned-Inactive Mines on Bitterroot National Forest-Administered Land Open-File Report MBMG 484 October 2003 Phyllis A. Hargrave Catherine McDonald Michael D. Kerschen John J. Metesh Robert Wintergerst Prepared for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service-Region 1 CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................ iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................1 1.1 Project Objectives ....................................................1 1.2 Abandoned and Inactive Mines Defined . 2 1.3 Health and Environmental Problems at Mines . 2 1.3.1 Acid Mine Drainage ...........................................3 1.3.2 Solubilities of Selected Metals ...................................3 1.3.3 The Use of pH and SC to Identify Problems . 5 1.4 Methodology ........................................................5 1.4.1 Data Sources .................................................5 1.4.2 Pre-Field Screening............................................6 1.4.3 Field Screening ...............................................7 1.4.4 Field Methods ................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation for Seven Segments of The
    Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation for Seven Segments of the Chattahoochee River in the Chattahoochee River Basin (PCBs in Fish Tissue) Submitted to: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia Submitted by: The Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Atlanta, Georgia January 2003 Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation January 2003 Chattahoochee River (PCBs in Fish Tissue) Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Watershed Description.................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Impact of PCBs ............................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Water Quality Standard................................................................................................. 2 2.0 AVAILABLE MONITORING DATA..................................................................................... 5 3.0 SOURCE ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................. 6 4.0 TMDL DEVELOPMENT APPROACH ................................................................................ 7 5.0 ALLOCATION ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Total Maximum Daily Load Discussion
    Appendix C Total Maximum Daily Load Discussion REGIONAL NIAGARA RIVER/LAKE ERIE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN (Phase 2) Total Maximum Daily Load What is a TMDL? A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) is a calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive and still safely meet water quality standards. TMDLs are governed by the Clean Water Act (CWA) under Section 303. More specifically, the EPA regulations define a TMDL as the sum of pollutant loads from point sources (“waste load allocations”) and nonpoint sources (“load allocations”).1 Such loads shall be established at a level necessary to implement the applicable water quality standards with seasonal variations and a margin of safety. Water Quality Standard A water quality standard on the other hand is based on use. It is either a narrative standard or numeric criteria set by states that focus on uses of the waterbody. 2 A narrative standard would be swimming or fishing. Setting numeric criteria states the allowable amount, or calculation, of a pollutant in the implementing regulation.3 The use is then backed by calculations of pollutant loads which must be met in order to meet the designated use for a waterbody. Each entity that must discharge a categorized pollutant into a waterbody is able to discharge only a certain amount. This amount is known as its “allocation.” The allocation of each industry or discharger is directed by a permit. Permits are guided by the National Pollution Elimination Discharge System (NPDES). New York State has its own federally-approved program known as the State Pollution Elimination Discharge System (SPDES).
    [Show full text]