<<

Adhesive Capsulitis: Clinical Practice Guidelines

Evaluation/Intervention Component 1: medical screening

Appropriate for Appropriate for physical therapy Not appropriate for physical versus versus evaluation and intervention evaluation and intervention along therapy evaluation and intervention with consultation with another healthcare provider

Evaluation/Intervention Component 2: di erential Consultation with appropriate evaluation of clinical findings suggestive of healthcare provider musculoskeletal impairments of body functioning (ICF) and the associated tissue pathology/ (ICD)

Diagnostic Classification Criteria

Shoulder and mobility stability and movement Shoulder pain and muscle power deficits/adhesive capsulitis coordination impairments/dislocation of deficits/rotator cu syndrome Rule in if: shoulder joint, or and of Rule in if: • Patient’s age is between 40 and 65 years shoulder joint • Symptoms developed from, or worsen • Patient reports a gradual onset and Rule in if: with, repetitive overhead activities or progressive worsening of pain and stiness • Patient’s age is less than 40 years from an strain such as a fall onto • Pain and stiness limit sleeping, grooming, • History of shoulder dislocation the shoulder , and reaching activities • Excessive glenohumeral accessory • Midrange (about 90°) catching • Glenohumeral passive range of motion motions in multiple directions sensation/arc of pain with active (ROM) is limited in multiple directions, with external rotation the most limited, • Apprehension at end ranges of flexion, elevation more particularly in adduction horizontal abduction, and/or external • Manual resistive tests to the rotator • Glenohumeral external or internal rotation cu muscles, performed in midranges rotation ROM decreases as the humerus Rule out if: of shoulder flexion and abduction, is abducted from 45° toward 90° • No history of dislocation reproduce the patient’s reported • Passive motions into the end ranges of • Presence of global glenohumeral shoulder pain glenohumeral motions reproduce the motion limitations • Rotator cu muscle patient’s reported shoulder pain • Joint glides/a ccessory motions are • No apprehension with end-range Rule out if: restricted in all directions shoulder active or passive motions • Resistive tests are pain free • Supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and Rule out if: biceps brachii have normal strength • Passive ROM is normal • Significant loss of passive motion • Radiographic evidence of glenohumeral is present • Passive glenohumeral external or internal rotation ROM increases as the humerus is abducted from 45° toward 90° and the reported shoulder pain is reproduced with palpatory provocation of the subscapularis myofascia • Upper-limb tension testing reproduces the reported symptoms and shoulder pain can be increased or decreased with altering nerve tension positions • Shoulder pain is reproduced with palpatory provocation of the relevant peripheral nerve entrapment site

Figure continues on page 2.

journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy | volume 43 | number 5 | may 2013 | 1

43-05 Guidelines.indd 10 9/26/2017 7:20:56 PM Adhesive Capsulitis: Clinical Practice Guidelines

Evaluation/Intervention Component 3: diagnosis of tissue level

High Irritability Moderate Irritability Low Irritability Characterized by: Characterized by: Characterized by: • Reports high levels of pain • Reports moderate levels of pain • Reports minimal levels of pain (≥7/ 10) (4-6/10) (≤3/10) • Consistent night or resting pain • Intermittent night or resting pain • No night or resting pain • High levels of reported disability versus • Moderate levels of reported versus • Minimal levels of reported on standardized self-report disability on standardized disability on standardized outcome tools self-report outcome tools self-report outcome tools • Pain occurs before end ranges of • Pain occurs at end ranges of • Pain occurs with overpressures active or passive movements active or passive movements into end ranges of passive • Active ROM is significantly less • Active ROM similar to passive ROM movements than passive ROM due to pain • Active ROM same as passive ROM

Evaluation/Intervention Component 4: intervention strategies for shoulder pain and mobility deficits

High Irritability Moderate Irritability Low Irritability Modalities: Modalities: Self-care/home management training: • Heat for pain modulation • Heat for pain modulation as needed • Patient education on progression to • Electrical for pain • Electrical stimulation for pain performing high-demand functional modulation modulation as needed and/or recreational activities Self-care/home management training: Self-care/home management training: Manual therapy: • Patient education on progressing • End-range joint mobilization • Patient education on positions of activities to gain motion and function procedures, high amplitude and long and activity modifications to without producing tissue inflammation duration of procedures into tissue limit tissue inflammation and pain and pain resistance Manual therapy: Manual therapy: Stretching exercises: • Low-intensity joint mobilization • Moderate-intensity joint mobilization • Stretching exercises, progressing the procedures in the pain-free accessory procedures, progressing amplitude duration of the stretches into tissue ranges and glenohumeral positions and duration of procedures into tissue resistance without producing Mobility exercises: resistance without producing posttreatment tissue inflammation and • Pain-free passive ROM exercises posttreatment tissue inflammation associated pain • Pain-free active assisted ROM and associated pain Neuromuscular re-education: exercises Stretching exercises: • Procedures to integrate gains in • Gentle to moderate stretching mobility into normal scapulohumeral exercises, progressing the intensity movement during performance of the and duration of the stretches into activities performed by the patient tissue resistance without producing during his/her functional and/or posttreatment tissue inflammation recreational activities and associated pain Neuromuscular re-education: • Procedures to integrate gains in mobility into normal scapulohumeral movement while performing reaching activities

journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy | volume 43 | number 5 | may 2013 | 2

43-05 Guidelines.indd 11 9/26/2017 7:20:56 PM Adhesive Capsulitis: Clinical Practice Guidelines

Component 1 Component 3 Medical screening incorporates the findings of the history Diagnosis of tissue irritability is important for guiding the and physical examination to determine whether the patient’s clinical decisions regarding treatment frequency, intensity, symptoms originate from a more serious pathology, such as duration, and type, with the goal of matching the optimal a tumor or infection, rather than from a common shoulder dosage of treatment to the status of the tissue being treated. musculoskeletal disorder.80,139 In addition to serious medi- Irritability is a term used by rehabilitation practitioners to cal conditions, clinicians should screen for the presence of reflect the tissue’s ability to handle physical ,81 and is psychosocial issues that may prognostication and presumably related to physical status and the extent of in- treatment decision making for rehabilitation. For example, flammatory activity that is present. Three levels of irritability elevated scores on the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia or the are operationally defined in the FIGURE. The primary clinical -Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire have been associated finding that determines the level of tissue irritability is the with a longer recovery, chronic symptoms, and work loss in relation between pain and active and passive movements. patients with shoulder pain.42,59,79 Accordingly, identifying Other clinical findings that characterize the level of tissue cognitive behavioral tendencies during the patient’s evalua- irritability are pain level, frequency of pain, and level of dis- tion can direct the therapist to employ specific patient edu- ability reported by the patient. cation strategies to optimize patient outcomes to physical therapy interventions and potentially provide indications for Component 4 referring the patient for consultation with another medical or Because irritability level often reflects the tissue’s ability mental health practitioner.10 to accept physical stress, clinicians should match the most appropriate intervention strategies to the level of irrita- Component 2 bility.60 Patients with a high level of tissue irritability are Differential evaluation of musculoskeletal clinical findings is not ready for significant physical stress being applied to used to determine the most relevant physical impairments as- the affected tissues, and therefore the treatment should sociated with the patient’s reported activity limitations and emphasize activity modification and appropriate modali- medical diagnosis. Clusters of these clinical findings, which ties, , and manual therapy to relieve pain and commonly coexist in patients, are described as impairment . In addition, only low levels of glenohumeral patterns in the physical therapy literature1 and are labeled exercises should be performed while encouraging motion according to the key impairment(s) of body function associ- at adjacent regions. Patients with a moderate level of irri- ated with that cluster. These impairment patterns are useful tability should be able to tolerate controlled physical stress in driving the interventions, which focus on normalizing the in the form of progressive manual therapy, mild stretch- key impairments of body function, which in turn improves the ing, and strengthening activities. They should also be able movement and function of the patient and lessens or alleviates to perform basic functional activities. In comparison, pa- the activity limitations commonly reported by the patients tients with low irritability should be able to tolerate pro- who meet the diagnostic criteria of that specific pattern. Key gressive physical stress in the form of stretching, manual clinical findings to rule in and rule out the common impair- therapy, resistive exercise, and higher-demand physical ment patterns, and their associated medical conditions, are activities. shown in the FIGURE. Impairment-based classification is criti- cal for matching the intervention strategy that is most likely to Clinicians should recognize that patients with ad- provide the optimal outcome for a patient’s clinical findings. F hesive capsulitis present with a gradual and pro- However, it is important for clinicians to understand that pa- gressive onset of pain and loss of active and passive tients with shoulder pain often fit more than 1 impairment shoulder motion in both elevation and rotation. Utilizing pattern and that the most relevant impairments of body func- the evaluation and intervention components described in tion and the associated intervention strategies often change these guidelines will assist clinicians in medical screening, during the patient’s episode of care. Thus, continual re-eval- differential evaluation of common shoulder musculoskeletal uation of the patient’s response to treatment and the patient’s disorders, diagnosing tissue irritability levels, and planning emerging clinical findings is important for providing the op- intervention strategies for patients with shoulder pain and timal interventions throughout the patient’s episode of care. mobility deficits. Martin JK, Shaffer MA, Kuhn JE, et al. Shoulder pain and mobility deficits: adhesive capsulitis: clinical practice guidelines linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health from the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43:A1-A31. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2013.0302

©2017 Orthopaedic Section, American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), Inc, and the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy®.

journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy | volume 43 | number 5 | may 2013 | 3

43-05 Guidelines.indd 12 9/26/2017 7:20:56 PM