Gene Technology in Agriculture, Environment and Biopharming: Beyond Bt-Rice and Building Better Breeding Budgets for Crops
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ICOHTEC, TICCIH & Worklab Joint Conference in Tampere, Finland
ABSTRACTS ICOHTEC, TICCIH & Worklab joint conference in Tampere, Finland 10th–15th of August 2010 WEDNESDAY TRANSFORMATION OF INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTS: Session W1A PROCESSES, TOOLS, RE-THINKING I Room A1 8:30–10:00 Chair: Helmuth ALBRECHT, Institute for the History of Science and Technology, Technical University Freiberg, Germany Industrial Cultural Landscape Montane Region Ore Mountain on the Way to UNESCO – Public Participation and Community Involvement Heidi PINKEPANK INIK GmbH, Germany Based on the hypothesis that heritage protection (in particluar World Heritage) creating economical and development barriers is due to restricted communica- tion with and participation of the local communities, this paper discusses the im- portance of Public Acceptance, Participation and Community Involvement using the example of the Industrial Cultural Landscape Montane Region Ore Mountain (Erzgebirge/ Krusnohori). The Montane Region is of particular interest since it is a Cultural Landscape, a serial and transnational property and therefore features a variety of aspects of participation and community involvement including lan- guage and mentality barriers. The central challenge of dealing with such a living cultural landscape, however, lies in responding to development dynamics to allow socio-economic changes and growth on one hand, while simultaneously respect- ing the traditional cultural landscape and its surroundings. In order to achieve this, goals have to be defined and strategies for implementation developed. In the context of this Paper, important insights regarding the variety of stake- holders were gained through face-to-face interviews of representatives of cer- tain stakeholder groups (e.g. local tourism, local businesses, local people, church representatives, museums, culture representatives) in the Ore Mountain (Ger- many and Czech Republic). -
Number 55 Foreign Participation In
•. t' '. '.' : , ' NUMBER 55 FOREIGN PARTICIPATION IN RUSSIAN ECONOMIC LIFE: NOTES ON BRITISH ENTERPRISE: 1865-1914 FRED V. CARSTENSEN UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA Conference on Entrepreneurship and Economic Innovation in Russia/Soviet Union Sponsored by Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies November 16-18, 1978 Washington, D.C. DRAFT PAPER - NOT FOR CITATION 11/8/78 MEMORANDUM t6l JOSEPH FRE~V\N Chief, Duplicating Branch FRm.f: Wi 11 iam M. Nunn This memorandum is to authorize overtime necessary to complete duplication of the attached paper in time for delivery by the close of business on November 16, 1978. Fund to be charged is 72845900. Thank you very much for your help. Foreign Participation in Russian Economic Life: Notes on British Enterprise: 1865-1914 (Draft) Fred V. Carstensen University of Virginia This paper may not be quoted or cited except with the written permission of the author N.B. The materials on which this paper draws are the results of two research to Britain in 1974'tlf'!b .• · supported by grants from the Council on Res~arch in Economic History and the American Philosophical Society. Some parts of the paper are incomplete because of in receiving microfilmed materials from London. Russian economic historians have typically given special emphasis to the role which the government assumed in the period 1885-1903 in shaping Russian economic development. In the absence of a vigorous, competitive market which would develop the creative, developmental energies of native businessmen, the government itself undertook to provide economic leadership to draw into Russia the energy of foreign enterprise. -
The Russian Technical Society and British Textile Machinery Imports
THE RUSSIAN TECHNICAL SOCIETY AND BRITISH TEXTILE MACHINERY IMPORTS By Stuart Thompstone 2002.IV Stuart Thompstone School of History and Art History University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK Tel: +44 (0) 115 951 5928 Fax: +44 (0) 115 951 5948 This paper is circulated for discussion purposes only and its contents should be considered to be preliminary. THE RUSSIAN TECHNICAL SOCIETY AND BRITISH TEXTILE MACHINERY IMPORTS Abstract The strident nationalism that characterised Tsarist Russia’s final decades, compounded by the anti-capitalist stance of its Soviet successor, have served to downplay in Russian historiography the role of foreign entrepreneurship in pre- Revolutionary Russia and to portray in negative colours the contribution of native entrepreneurs to the country’s social and economic development. However, recent Russian historiography has sought to show native Russian entrepreneurship in a more positive light. The leading Russian textile dynasty, the Morozovs, for example, which accounted for about 10 per cent of Russia’s textile production in the early twentieth century, who were condemned in the Soviet era for their allegedly ruthless labour relations and their slowness to embrace new technology have recently undergone a rehabilitation. The time would seem apposite, therefore, for a reappraisal of the flow of textile technology from Britain to Russia and to re-examine the charge made in the 1890s by the Russian Technical Society (RTO) in particular that British textile technology exercised a retarding influence on the development of the Russian textile industry. In essence this involves an examination of the role of the Bremen born entrepreneur, Ludwig Knoop (1821-1894), who after a brief sojourn in Manchester working for the cotton exporters, De Jersey & Co., went to Russia to become the main conduit for the flow of English machinery into Russia’s textile sector. -
1 Logistics, Market Size and Giant Plants in the Early 20Th Century: A
Logistics, market size and giant plants in the early 20th century: a global view. by Leslie Hannah Professor of Economics, University of Tokyo; Directeur d’Etudes Associé, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris. Department of Economics University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. 620, Maison Suger 16-18 Rue Suger, 75006 Paris, France. [email protected] This paper has been prepared to introduce a Round Table Discussion at the European Science Foundation’s “EUROCORES” Inventing Europe conference on 7-10 June 2007 in Rotterdam; for further details see the conference website at www.histech.nl/tensions 1 Logistics, Market Size and Giant Plants in the early 20th Century: a Global View. ABSTRACT Around 1900, the businesses of developed Europe – transporting freight by a more advantageous mix of ships, trains and horses – encountered logistic barriers to trade lower than the tyranny of distance imposed on the sparsely populated United States. Highly urbanized, economically integrated and compact northwest Europe was a market space larger than, and - factoring in other determinants besides its (low) tariffs - not less open to inter-country trade than the contemporary American market was to interstate trade. By the early twentieth century, the First European Integration enabled mines and factories – in small, as well as large, countries – to match the size of United States plants, where factor endowments, consumer demand or scale economies required that. “We found there, as every attentive and expert traveller will find everywhere in the civilized world, some things better and some things less good than with us.” 1906 German Official Report on US Visit (Hoff and Schwabach, North American Railroads, p. -
NARVA IS NEXT Narva Candidate City European Capital of Culture 2024
1. Longass chapter title goes here NARVA IS NEXT Narva Candidate City European Capital of Culture 2024 Narva. Candidate City European Capital of Culture 2024 1 1. Longass chapter title goes here NARVA IS NEXT Narva Candidate City European Capital of Culture 2024 2 Narva. Candidate City European Capital of Culture 2024 Kirkenes 1. Contribution to the long-term strategyMurmansk 5 2. NorvegianCultural sea and artistic content 14 3. European dimension 53 4. Outreach 64 Introduction 5. Management 69 6. Capacity to deliver 97 – General considerations Iceland Ume 8 5 0 k m inland 4 2 5 HAS THE CONCEPT OF THE ropean Union); a small nation with big which can be overcome by a bridge con- Tampere k m PROGRAMME DESCRIBED ideas (Estonia); and a neighbour in the necting people, identities, art forms, dis- 2 Noray 00 FOR THE ECOC YEAR process of reconstructing its national ciplines and destinies, also remains un- Helsinki k m CHANGED BETWEEN THE story (Russia). Narva 2024 is driven by changed. But we are also building the Oslo Stockholm St Petersburg Narva PRE-SELECTION AND THE a passion for revitalising the city and idea of the river as a shared resource, Sweden Tallinn Ivangorod SELECTION STAGE? IF YES, region in this wider historical and ge- as something touching both banks, as Etonia Baltic sea PLEASE DESCRIBE THE NEW opolitical context, but it is also a sym- something that connects rather than di- uia CONCEPT AND EXPLAIN THE bol of hope and tolerance. It is con- vides. The symbols of the river-border- Pskov Riga REASONS FOR THE CHANGE.