INTEGRATED NATIONAL ENERGY and CLIMATE PLAN for FRANCE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INTEGRATED NATIONAL ENERGY and CLIMATE PLAN for FRANCE INTEGRATED NATIONAL ENERGY AND CLIMATE PLAN for FRANCE March 2020 1 2 Table of contents 1. Overview and process for establishing the plan ................................................................................. 4 2. National objectives and targets ......................................................................................................... 52 3. Policies and measures ....................................................................................................................... 81 4. Current situation and projections with existing policies and measures ......................................... 138 5. Impact analysis of planned policies and measures ......................................................................... 303 3 SECTION A: NATIONAL PLAN 1. OVERVIEW AND PROCESS FOR ESTABLISHING THE PLAN 1.1. Executive summary 1.1.1. Context and targets This draft integrated national energy and climate plan for France is based on two documents adopted at national level on the governance and programming of matters relating to energy and climate. The Multiannual Energy Plan (programmation pluriannuelle de l’énergie, MEP), which establishes the priorities for government action in the field of energy for the next 10 years, divided into two five-year periods. It covers all energy types and all of the cornerstones of energy policy (managing energy demand, promoting renewable energies, safeguarding security of supply, controlling energy costs, developing networks in a balanced manner, etc.), and makes it possible to forge a coherent and integrated vision of the role of energies in French society and desirable future trends in this respect. The National Low-Carbon Strategy (stratégie nationale bas-carbone, SNBC), which is France’s roadmap for climate change mitigation. This provides guidelines to enable the transition to a low-carbon economy across all sectors. It specifies France’s short-term and medium-term greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction targets (carbon budgets) and aims to achieve carbon neutrality, i.e. net zero emissions, by 2050. The MEP and the SNBC are closely linked: the energy scenario in the MEP is identical to that in the SNBC for the period covered by the former. The MEP covers the first 10 years of the SNBC as regards energy consumption and the energy mix. The MEP adopts an operational approach to this 10-year period in terms of government action to decarbonise energy. Compliance with the projections of the SNBC for the period until 2050 represents one possible trajectory for achieving France’s climate targets. The SNBC covers all greenhouse gases, some of which are not covered by the MEP. The scope of the MEP is restricted to metropolitan France, whereas the SNBC also covers the overseas departments. As a result, the parts of these documents incorporated into the Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan (PNIEC) may vary slightly in terms of scope. The Law on Energy Transition for Green Growth (LTECV) of 17 August 2015 sets out the principles underpinning the process for drafting these two documents. The SNBC and the first three carbon budgets were adopted by decree (Decree No 2015-1491 of 18 November 2015). The MEP for the period 2016– 2023 was also adopted by decree (Decree No 2016-1442 of 27 October 2016). The MEP and the SNBC are linked in terms of compatibility: the LTECV provides for the MEP to be compatible with the SNBC and the GHG emissions reduction targets set in the carbon budgets. The LTECV states that these two documents should be revised every five years, with the exception of the first revision, which was initially planned for the end of 2018 for the MEP and mid-2019 for the SNBC. A full revision cycle for the MEP and the SNBC therefore started in 2017 and continued throughout 2018. A draft revised version of the SNBC was published in December 2018 (hereinafter the ‘draft SNBC 2’). Prior to its adoption by decree, the draft underwent a process of statutory consultation 4 (involving the Environmental Authority, the High Council for Climate, the Corsican Assembly, the overseas authorities, the National Council for Standards Assessment, the Regulatory Impact Mission of the Secretariat General of the Government and the public). A draft version of the MEP for the period 2019–2028 (hereinafter the ‘draft MEP 2’) was published in January 2019. Prior to its adoption by decree, the draft underwent a process of statutory consultation involving the energy committees. The current draft integrated national energy and climate plan for France incorporates sections from the draft SNBC 2 and the draft MEP 2, and follows the general framework outlined in Annex I to the Regulation on the governance of the Energy Union. The SNBC 2 and the MEP 2 were drafted for the purpose of ensuring that France can comply with the energy and climate targets imposed on it by the EU. The following table contains the EU targets that apply to France and the figures forecast for 2030 under a scenario that assumes the implementation of France’s energy and climate strategy. Target Timeline Forecast National target of -20% 120.9 Mtoe compared to 2012 Final energy consumption 2030 or -32.6% EU target of -32.5% compared compared to to trend-based scenario PRIMES 2007 202.2 Mtoe No national target or -24.6% Primary energy consumption EU target of -32.5% compared 2030 compared to to trend-based scenario PRIMES 2007 Share of renewable energy in National target of 33% 41 Mtoe gross final energy 2030 consumption EU target of 32% or 33% Renewable and recovered heat +0.9% per year +1% per year up to 60% 2030 and cold in district heating up to 65% Between +1.2% Increase in the rate of +1.3% per year 2030 and +1.8% per renewable and recovered heat year GHG emissions except for land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) and except -37% compared to 2005 2030 -42% for sectors covered by the European carbon market (EU ETS) Emissions do not exceed 2021–2025 Overall Land use, land-use change and removals in relation to the and compliance with forestry (LULUCF) reference period of 2005– no-debit rule 20091 2026-2030 The trajectory corresponding to these targets differs slightly from that presented in the draft MEP and SNBC published in early 2019; in particular, it is slightly more ambitious in terms of energy efficiency 1 For the land sector and with reference to a projected reference level for forests in relation to forestry management. 5 in the buildings and industry sectors, and includes recently implemented or planned measures (application of the Law on Energy and Climate adopted on 8 November 2019 regarding the renovation of ‘thermal sieves’ (buildings that lose a large amount of heat), freezing of the carbon component, etc.). The target for renewable energies was also increased to 33% of final energy consumption, compared to 32% in the initial draft. The measures explicitly outlined in the final version of the MEP and therefore in the integrated national energy and climate plan will not be sufficient to achieve all the relevant targets by 2030, in particular with regard to a reduction in final energy consumption, meaning that additional measures must be taken. The gradual increases in the carbon component of taxation were suspended in November 2018, meaning that new measures are also required to achieve outcomes equivalent to those anticipated for this component. These measures may be tabled by the governance bodies that have recently been set up (Ecological Defence Council, High Council for Climate, Citizens’ Climate Convention). As an indication of the amount of work that remains to be done, it has been estimated that the following outcomes would be achieved by 2030 if action were limited solely to the measures set out in the MEP: - a reduction of 39.5% in GHG emissions (with reference to 1990), compared to a target of 40% stipulated by law, and an expected outcome of 43.2% for the trajectory that serves as a basis for the MEP and the SNBC; - a reduction of 17% in final energy consumption (with reference to 2012), compared to a target of 20% stipulated by law, and an expected outcome of 20% for the trajectory that serves as a basis for the MEP and the SNBC; - a reduction of 36% in primary fossil fuel consumption (with reference to 2012), compared to a target of 40% stipulated by law, and an expected result of 41% for the trajectory that serves as a basis for the MEP and the SNBC; - an increase of 33% in renewable energy consumption, in line with the target stipulated by law and the trajectory that serves as a basis for the MEP and the SNBC. 1.1.2. Key strategies and measures relating to the five dimensions of the Energy Union Generally speaking, and even though the data are broken down by dimensions and sectors, it is important to remember that many measures have cross-sector effects and promote the achievement of several targets. For example, measures that reduce levels of atmospheric pollutants typically have a positive impact on GHG emissions, and in some cases on energy efficiency. Conversely, care must be taken to avoid potential adverse impacts (for example, a deterioration in air quality caused by an increase in the use of wood). When working on the scenario that serves as a basis for the MEP and the SNBC, it was necessary to adopt a holistic and cross-sector approach to the various dimensions and sectors, even if it was impossible to examine all of the relevant topics in depth. 1.1.2.1. Decarbonisation Carbon budgets: a key tool for steering the trajectory of GHG emissions reductions The carbon budgets specified in the SNBC are greenhouse gas emissions caps that must not be exceeded at national level over specific five-year periods. They define the target trajectory for GHG emissions reductions in the short and medium term, in line with France’s commitments at EU and international level.
Recommended publications
  • Investigating Hidden Flexibilities Provided by Power-To-X Consid- Ering Grid Support Strategies
    InVESTIGATING Hidden FleXIBILITIES ProVIDED BY Power-to-X Consid- ERING Grid Support StrATEGIES Master Thesis B. Caner YAgcı˘ Intelligent Electrical POWER Grids Investigating Hidden Flexibilities Provided by Power-to-X Considering Grid Support Strategies Master Thesis by B. Caner Yağcı to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Tuesday September 14, 2020 at 9:30. Student number: 4857089 Project duration: December 2, 2019 – September 14, 2020 Thesis committee: Dr. Milos Cvetkovic, TU Delft, supervisor Dr. ir. J. L. Rueda Torres, TU Delft Dr. L. M. Ramirez Elizando TU Delft This thesis is confidential and cannot be made public until September 14, 2020. An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Preface First of all, I would like to thank PhD. Digvijay Gusain and Dr. Milos Cvetkovic for not only teaching me the answers through this journey, but also giving me the perception of asking the right questions that lead simple ideas into unique values. I would also like to thank my family Alican, Huriye, U˘gur, Gökhan who have been supporting me from the beginning of this journey and more. You continue inspiring me to find my own path and soul, even from miles away. Your blessing is my treasure in life... My friends, Onurhan and Berke. You encourage me and give me confidence to be my best in any scene. You are two extraordinary men who, I know, will always be there when I need. Finally, I would like to thank TU Delft staff and my colleagues in TU Delft for making this journey enter- taining and illuminative for me.
    [Show full text]
  • Pays De La Loire Baromètre De La Commande Publique 2021 Resultats 2020
    DÉCLINAISON RÉGIONALE RÉGION PAYS DE LA LOIRE BAROMÈTRE DE LA COMMANDE PUBLIQUE 2021 RESULTATS 2020 20 21 Interne RÉSULTATS 2020 AU NIVEAU NATIONAL 71 Mds € en 2020 -18% entre 2020/2019 Tous les secteurs d’intervention, toutes les La commande publique publiée La baisse en 2020 est d’autant natures de dépenses sont était de 87 Mds en 2019, soit plus forte que le niveau 2019 concernés une baisse de 16 Mds était exceptionnel ème Tous les donneurs d’ordre sont La reprise est nette au 2 La baisse concerne tout le semestre concernés territoire Les volumes d’achats sont Les collectivités davantage, et le Mais est plus forte sur l’axe Est bloc communal plus encore comparables à ceux de 2018 VECTEUR PLUS Interne 2 ÉVOLUTION GLOBALE DE LA COMMANDE PUBLIQUE La commande publique publiée en PAYS DE LA LOIRE (en Md€) PAYS DE 5,6 LA LOIRE 5,0 4,6 4,1 4,1 4,1 3,9 3,9 3,8 -10% -18% -2% -5% 2% 3% 13% -18% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 NATIONALE -3,9% -16,2% -0,7% -6,0 % 7,3% -1,2% 11,6% -18% VECTEUR PLUS Interne 3 LES DONNEURS D’ORDRE LA COMMANDE PUBLIQUE PAR CATÉGORIE D’ACHETEURS (EN %) NATIONALE PAYS DE 2% 2019 Collectivités et groupements 3% 2019 5% 5% LA LOIRE 6,4% 6% Bailleurs sociaux 9% Etat 11% Hopitaux et établissements de santé 59% 13% EPL 15% 65% Opérateurs publics Autres 2% 2020 3% 6% Collectivités et groupements 5,4% 2020 6% Bailleurs sociaux 7% 9% Etat 12% Hopitaux et établissements de santé 55% EPL 16% 61% Opérateurs publics 16,6% Autres VECTEUR PLUS Interne LES DONNEURS D’ORDRE PAYS DE LA LOIRE La commande publique publiée
    [Show full text]
  • Inequalities in France Responding to Inequalities Sceptics: an Assessment of Inequalities in France from the Perspective of the Sustainable Development Goals
    MAKE EUROPE SUSTAINABLE F R ALL INEQUALITIES IN FRANCE RESPONDING TO INEQUALITIES SCEPTICS: AN ASSESSMENT OF INEQUALITIES IN FRANCE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS Alexandre Pasche for SDSN France; 4D; wecf France; ATD Fourth World; French Committee for International Solidarity (CFSI); Les Petits Débrouillards (Resourceful youth); Water Coalition; CLER Réseau pour la transition énergétique (Energy Transition Network); French Democratic Confederation of Labour (CFDT); Fondation Internet Nouvelle Génération (FING); Max Havelaar France; Notre Affaire à Tous (Our shared responsibility); Surfrider Foundation Europe; Humanité et Biodiversité (Humanity and Biodiversity); Human Rights League (LDH); Coordination SUD (Southern Coordination) Inequalities in France 2 This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this factsheet are the sole responsibility of “Make Europe Sustainable For All” project and can under no circumstances be taken as reflecting the position of the European Union. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Income and wealth Women’s health is adversely affected by exposure to Inequalities are on the rise in France.1 There are now chemicals in occupations where women predominate, 8.8 million people below the poverty line,2 receiving such as beauty salons, and there is particular concern a net income of less than €1,026 per month; two regarding foetal exposure to environmental toxins.6 million people are living on less than €700 per month; In the health system women experience delayed nearly five million are receiving food aid; and over diagnoses and inferior care: for example, on average, 200,000 are living on the street or in dwellings unfit for female heart attack victims receive treatment an hour habitation.
    [Show full text]
  • GPPC Meeting Cape Town, August 2018
    National implementation of the GSPC FRANCE GPPC meeting Cape Town, August 2018 PHILIPPE BARDIN1,, MAÏTÉ DELMAS2 SERGE MULLER3 Muséum National d´Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France 1 Conservatoire Botanique National du Bassin Parisien, Direction Générale Recherche, Evaluation, Valorisation et Enseignement 2 Maïté Delmas, Direction of European, International and Overseas relations 3 UMR ISYEB Institut Systématique Evolution Biodiversité [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] A European responsability Continental Atlantic Alpine Mediterranean 4 out of the 9 European biogeographic regions 1 hotspot: Mediterranean basin Source : Ministère en charge de l'Écologie Guadeloupe Réunion Island Clipperton St-Pierre & Miquelon 1628 km² 2512 km² 2 km² 242 km² Martinique French Polynesia St-Martin & 3521 km² St-Barthelemy 1128 km² Metropolitan France 78 km² 550 000 km² French Overseas Territories 110 000 km² North An Atlantic international Ocean responsibility Pacific Ocean Indian Ocean Mayotte Wallis & Futuna French 215 km² Guyana 376 km² 84 000 km² New Caledonia Eparse Isl. 18 600 km² 53 km² Austral Isl. 7800 km² How is the GSPC being addressed in France? A European Plant conservation Strategy but NO national GSPC strategy A European Biodiversity Strategy + National biodiversity strategy Overseas Strategies: Mayotte, La Reunion and French Guiana (in preparation) In French Polynesia: State of the environment Law for the reconquest of biodiversity, nature and landscapes August 2016 A network of Conservatoires
    [Show full text]
  • Uittreksel Uit De Notulen Van De Gemeenteraad
    Uittreksel uit de notulen van de gemeenteraad Datum: 24 februari 2020 Aanwezig: Bert Doise, voorzitter; Marc Lewyllie, burgemeester; Wieland De Meyer, Dirk Baekelandt, Jean-Pierre Geelhand de Merxem, schepenen; Hilde Stragier, voorzitter bijzonder comité voor de sociale dienst; Bernard Heens, Luc Caenepeel, Geert Debergh, Bart Vanacker, Carla Cardinael, Lieve D’Haene, Eddy Gryson, Bieke Dewaele, Jolien Deklerck, Sarah Vandelanotte, Evelyne Gaudissabois, Ivo Fonteyne, Caroline Ryde, raadsleden; Jef Huyghe, algemeen directeur. Openbare zitting. 10. Mens – Goedkeuring reglement dienstverlening Nestor De gemeenteraad Gelet op art. 41 van het decreet over het lokaal bestuur; Gezien de stopzetting van de intergemeentelijke samenwerking Dorpsdienst Nestor; Gezien de erkenning van Dorpsdienst Nestor als autonome vrijwilligersorganisatie; Gelet op de goedgekeurde meerjarenplanning 2020-2025; Gelet op het voorstel van het college van burgemeester en schepenen; Tussenkomst schepen Hilde Stragier; Tussenkomst raadslid Ivo Fonteyne; Besluit: - met algemene stemmen – Art. 1. Goedkeuring te verlenen aan het reglement dienstverlening Nestor. REGLEMENT DIENSTVERLENING NESTOR 1. Doelstellingen Nestor Dorpsdienst Nestor is opgestart op 4 november 2002. Nestor is een afkorting voor Netwerk voor Steun aan Ouderen in het Ruraal gebied van Alveringem, Heuvelland, Lo-Reninge, Mesen, Poperinge en Vleteren. Vanaf 1 februari 2020 wordt de werking op het grondgebied Heuvelland verdergezet door het gemeentebestuur als Nestor Heuvelland. Het aanbod van Nestor is: - Vervoers- en boodschappendienst - Klusjesdienst - Gezelschapsdienst - Verjaardagsbezoekjes Nestor is er voor alle senioren en mensen met een zorgbehoefte in de gemeente Heuvelland. We willen mensen bereiken die door hun fysische, psychische, sociale of financiële situatie onvoldoende kunnen instaan voor bepaalde taken. Nestor wil noden en behoeften aanpakken op het platteland, door laagdrempelig en duurzaam samen te werken met andere (thuiszorg)diensten.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Régions Françaises : Les 22 Régions De France Métropolitaine
    GÉOGRAPHIE Primaire CYCLE 3 Les régions françaises : les 22 régions de France métropolitaine La France est divisée en 26 régions dont 22 situées en France métropolitaine. Chaque région comprend plusieurs départe- ments et de nombreuses communes. Les régions sont administrées par un Conseil régional qui s’occupe de l’aménagement du territoire, des lycées, de la formation professionnelle et des aides aux entreprises. Cette carte a pour objectifs : * de situer les 22 régions sur la carte de France * de découvrir les départements rattachés à chacune des régions * d’obtenir des informations démographiques, géographiques et économiques sur chacune des régions LÉGENDE * Aquitaine * Languedoc-Roussillon * Midi-Pyrénées * Rhônes-Alpes * Auvergne * Centre * Basse-Normandie * Pays de la Loire * Nord_Pas-de-Calais * Bourgogne * Île-de-France * Bretagne * Haute-Normandie * Franche-Comté * Champagne-ardennes * Lorraine / SOURCES : Insee - données démographiques 2010 / Site : vie-publique.fr - informations sur le nombre communes en 2013 sur le nombre 2010 / Site : vie-publique.fr - informations / SOURCES : Insee - données démographiques * Alsace * Poitou-Charentes * Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur * Corse * Limousin * Picardie 1 education.francetv.fr GÉOGRAPHIE Primaire CYCLE 3 Les régions françaises : les 22 régions de France métropolitaine /// 2 RÉGIONS * Alsace Densité (2010) : 52,0 hab./km² Départements : Côte d’Or (21), Nièvre (58), Saône-et-Loire (71), Yonne (89) Cette région a longtemps été disputée Particularités : La région Bourgogne est parcourue par deux grands fleuves : entre l’Allemagne et la France. la Seine et la Loire. C’est une région à forte tradition agricole. Qu’il s’agisse de vin, de fromage ou de viande, la Bourgogne offre des produits de qualité à l’origine Préfecture : Strasbourg certifiée.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Figures on Climate France and Worldwide 2016 Edition
    Highlights Key figures on climate France and worldwide 2016 Edition Service de l’observation et des statistiques www.statistiques.developpement-durable.gouv.fr www.i4ce.org Key figures on climate France and worldwide Part 1 Climate change 1.1 Global warming .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Consequences of climate change .....................................................................................................................................................................3 1.3 Climate scenarios and carbon budgets ....................................................................................................................................................5 1.4 Climate forecasts .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................7 1.5 Greenhouse effect ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................9 1.6 Greenhouse gases ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation of Abstracts
    International Workshop on Cultural Heritage Facing Climate Change: Experiences and Ideas for Resilience and Adaptation 18-19 May 2017, Ravello Italy Compilation of abstracts BIANCONI Patrizia, Rome. JPI on Cultural Heritage (JPIH), Italy The joint programming initiative on cultural heritage and global change (JPI CH) is one of the 10 initiatives launched in 2009 by the Council of the European Union with the scope of promoting all actions that can foster research and research planning both in academics and business domains. The aim is to face global challenges by defining a European common research area where R&D activities are channelled through innovation knowledge transfer. In particular, JPI CH is been working on developing this common area of research on Cultural Heritage that is to be intended as comprehensive field including three main dimensions: tangible, intangible and digital. The main objective of JPI CH is to promote the safeguarding of Cultural Heritage in its broader meaning: climate change, protection and security, uses of cultural heritage by society. The strong relationship between Cultural Heritage, technological innovation and economic development allows for further considerations within the European framework of challenges and competitiveness. BRATASZ Lucas, New York. Institute for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage, Yale University, USA. Impact of climate change on clay and organic materials Global climate change impact on cultural heritage objects has been much researched in recent years. Several risks leading to the degradation of objects in outdoor and indoor exposure have been considered encompassing chemical, biological, physical, structural and mechanical processes. However, there is no consensus between professionals how to assess risk of mechanical damage to heritage objects caused by the environmental fluctuation.
    [Show full text]
  • How to End Energy Poverty? Scrutiny of Current EU and Member States Instruments
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY How to end Energy Poverty? Scrutiny of Current EU and Member States Instruments STUDY Abstract Policymaking to alleviate energy poverty needs to find a balance between short- term remedies and the resolution of long-term drivers of energy poverty. EU policy might need to work towards a) finding a definition of energy poverty; b) supporting national policies financially through EU coordination; and c) setting minimum standards for energy efficiency of buildings and devices. This document was provided by Policy Department A at the request of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE). IP/A/ITRE/2014-06 October 2015 PE 563.472 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. AUTHORS Katja SCHUMACHER, Öko-Institut e.V. Johanna CLUDIUS, Öko-Institut e.V. Hannah FÖRSTER, Öko-Institut e.V. Benjamin GREINER, Öko-Institut e.V. Katja HÜNECKE, Öko-Institut e.V. Tanja KENKMANN, Öko-Institut e.V. Luc VAN NUFFEL, Trinomics RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Frédéric GOUARDÈRES EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Karine GAUFILLET LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU internal policies. To contact Policy Department A or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript completed in August 2015 © European Union, 2015 This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th Generation DHC Technology Guide
    4DHC technology guide 1 4DHC technology guide Researched by Checked by Reviewed by First Draft Final Draft Joseph Maria September 2019 Jebamalai Marijke Mahieu September 2019 Dirk Hoet October 2019 Author(s): Joseph Maria Jebamalai, Ghent University Email: [email protected] Phone: 32 (0) 487 94 98 47 Address: St. Pietersnieuwstraat 33, 9000 Gent Deliverable: WP.T3 D1.4 4DHC technology guide Date: September 2019 About HeatNet NWE This document has been developed as part of the HeatNet NWE project, which is part-funded through the Interreg NWE programme and aims to increase the uptake of 4DHC networks across North-West Europe. As part of this project, the partners are developing the HeatNet Model, which will help the public sector to begin implementing 4DHC networks, and the Transition Roadmaps, which will outline the partners’ experience in developing six district heating pilots across North-West Europe. The HeatNet Guide to Financing is also currently being developed and will give a broad overview of the various sources available to finance district heating schemes. For further information on these reports and on the HeatNet NWE project, please visit www.guidetodistrictheating.eu. 2 4DHC technology guide Table of contents Executive summary 4 Introduction 5 What is DHC? 5 Why 4DHC? 5 About 4DHC 6 Benefits of 4DHC 7 4DHC Systems: Technology Options 8 Low temperature waste heat 8 Solar thermal systems 15 Heat pumps 18 Geothermal systems 20 Cascading networks 24 Combined district heating and cooling systems 27 Combi-systems 28 4DHC components 28 Distribution pipes 35 Storage tanks 36 Pumps 37 Monitoring systems 37 Conversion of existing DH into 4DHC 38 Future of DHC 40 Conclusion 41 3 4DHC technology guide Executive summary This technology guide aims to help stakeholders involved in 4th generation district heating and cooling (4DHC) projects to understand the different sustainable technologies for the development of future-proof and efficient 4DHC networks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Young, Cosmopolitan and Talented Population
    Population A Young, Cosmopolitan and Talented Population Paris Region is the most populated region in France and the EU. It is one of the youngest and most multicultural regions in Europe. The Region’s population is incredibly diverse, with more foreigners living in the Region than in the rest of France. With a population growth of 0.5% per year between 2012 and 2017, the population of Paris Region is growing slightly faster than that of France. © Yann Rabanier / Choose Paris Region Europe’s Most Populous Region Paris Region EU28’s Most Populous Region 2019 Paris Region 12.2M 12.2M 18.3% (FR) Lombardy 10M inhabitants of France’s population (IT) Greater 8.9M London (UK) * Andalusia 2.7% of the European Union’s Over 100,000 inhabitants (ES) 8.4M population in 5 towns in Paris Region : Auvergne / Rhône-Alpes 8M Europe’s most populous region • Paris (FR) ahead of Lombardy, Greater • Boulogne-Billancourt Catalonia 7.5M London, Andalusia, Auvergne- • Saint-Denis (ES) Rhône-Alpes, and Catalonia. • Argenteuil Communidad Eurostat 2020 (data 2019), NUTS 2 • Montreuil de Madrid 6.6M (ES) INSEE 2020, data 2018 Lazio Paris Region: the Highest 5.9M Natural Balance in the European (IT) Union Campania 5.8M (Napoli) (IT) The region’s natural surplus now Dusseldorf exceeds that of any country in 5.2M (DE) the EU. * Greater London=Inner and Outer London Average annual population growth Eurostat 2020 (data 2019), NUTS 2 2012-2017: 0.5% Insee 01/2021 Over 250,000 new inhabitants by 2025 10 Paris Region Facts & Figures 2021 Population A Young, Dynamic Population Natality and Mortality Fertility Rate by Region • 173,892 births Paris Region contributes the most to the population growth • 75,788 deaths • Paris: 1.94 children per in metropolitan France.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Energy Education and Training in France
    NUCLEAR ENERGY IN FRANCE France now obtains about 78 percent of its electricity from nuclear energy, generated by 58 highly standardized pressurized-water reactors (PWR) at 19 locations. The operation of these reactors has provided extensive feedback on safety, cost effectiveness, proficiency, and public outreach. In producing nuclear energy, France has always relied on a closed- fuel-cycle approach, including reprocessing of the spent nuclear fuel, an approach deemed essential to conserve uranium resources and to manage the ultimate waste products efficiently and selectively. Recent years have confirmed the central role that safe and sustain- able nuclear energy plays in the French electricity supply with addi- tional renewable energy technologies. France is pursuing the development of fourth-generation fast-neutron reactors, as well as a continuing investigation of improved methods for the separation and transmutation of high-level, long-lived nuclear waste. Scientific and AERIAL VIEW OF LA HAGUE engineering research into the safe and appropriate geological REPROCESSING PLANT disposal of radioactive waste products is also ongoing. ©AREVA/J-M.TAILLAT In May 2006, the board of Electricité de France (EDF) approved the construction of a new 1650 MWe European Pressurized Reactor (EPR) at Flamanville near the tip of Normandy. In 2009, the French government strengthened its commitment to pressurized-water reactors by endorsing the construction of a second EPR unit at Penly, near Dieppe. NEW CHALLENGES AND NEW REQUIREMENTS In its continuing use of nuclear power, France faces numerous chal- lenges, including the operation and maintenance of its existing array of reactors, waste management, the decommissioning of obsolete reactors, and research and development for future nuclear systems.
    [Show full text]