Estta244359 10/22/2008 in the United States
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov ESTTA Tracking number: ESTTA244359 Filing date: 10/22/2008 IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Proceeding 91178056 Party Plaintiff HUGO BOSS TRADE MARK MANAGEMENT GMBH & CO. KG Correspondence Lisa W. Rosaya Address Baker & McKenzie LLP 1114 Avenue of the Americas 44th floor New York, NY 10036 UNITED STATES [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Submission Plaintiff's Notice of Reliance Filer's Name Julia R. Talke Filer's e-mail [email protected], [email protected] Signature /jrt/ Date 10/22/2008 Attachments CHILD BOSS - 2nd Notice of Reliance.pdf ( 301 pages )(8824653 bytes ) EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT 2 February 12, 2008 Masaru Igari 12740 Withers Way Austin, Texas (512)826-6782 Ms. Lisa W. Rosaya Baker & McKenzie LLP 1114 Avenue of The Americas New York, NY 10036 RE: Opposition No.91178056 against CHILD BOSS (App.Serial No. 78/929,460) Atty. Docket No.: 56183138-04 Dear Ms. Losaya: Please find enclosed the following answers regarding the above referenced opposition proceeding: i) Answer for Opposer’s First Set of Interrogatories, ii) Answer for Opposer’s First Set of Document Requests, and iii) Answer for Opposer’s First Set of Requests for Admission to Applicant. Sincerely, Masaru Igari PROOF OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and complete copy of the foregoing APPLICANT’S ANSWER TO OPPOSER’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES was served: Lisa W. Rosaya Attorney of Opposer Baker & McKenzie LLP 1114 Avenue of the Americas 44th floor New York, NY 10036 UNITED STATES Telephone: (212)626-4557 Fax: (212)310-1659 and the following e-mail address: [email protected] on February 12, 2008. _____________ Masaru Igari Defendant 12740 Withers Way Austin, Texas 78727 Telephone: (512)826-6782 IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD _______________________________________ HUGO BOSS Trade Mark Management ) GmbH & Co. KG, ) ) Opposition No. 91178056 Opposer, ) ) Mark: CHILD BOSS v. ) Serial: 78/929,460 ) Masaru Igari, ) ) Applicant. ) ____________________________________)___ APPLICANT’S ANSWER TO OPPOSER’S INTERROGATORIES Applicant, Masaru Igari, hereby files its Answer to Opposer’s Interrogatories: The number of each answer is corresponding to the interrogatory number. Answer No. 1 Child Boss Ltd Co. Answer No. 2 Betty Pu – Co-owner and wife of Masaru Igari knows that HUGO BOSS Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. KG is opposing to Child Boss. Answer No. 3 None Answer No. 4 I have always wished to start my own business associated with something good for children. The business could be anything, but use great contents and materials that both children and parents can enjoy like books for children, toys for children, clothes for children, and etc. There is no special reason I picked clothes for children. As a matter fact, I offered HUGO BOSS Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. KG that I was willing to change the goods (children’s clothes) to something else such as children’s books or toys when HUGO BOSS Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. KG initially contacted me for their infringement concern. However HUGO BOSS Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. did not adopt my offer. My father, Koichi Igari, visited my home at Austin, Texas to see his first grand daughter from Japan in March 2005. My father observed his grand daughter’s free and unrestrained movements and told me “She is the center of this home. She is the child boss of this family.” And I really liked the sound of “Child Boss.” Therefore, I named my company as “Child Boss Ltd Co.” and applied for trademark as well. Answer No. 5 No item is promoted or sold or proposed to be promoted at anytime in the WORLD. This infringement case makes me timid to move forward my business. Answer No. 6 Not Applicable Answer No. 7 Not Applicable Answer No. 8 Not Applicable Answer No. 9 Not Applicable Answer No. 10 www.childboss.com and www.childboss.net are reserved by me since April 18, 2006. However, both websites have not used and there is no content in each website due to this infringement case. Answer No. 11 Not Applicable Answer No. 12 Not Applicable Answer No. 13 Not Applicable Answer No. 14 Not Applicable Answer No. 15 I do not recall the date and circumstances upon which I first learned of Opposer and Opposer’s Marks: “HUGO BOSS.” There was no action I took as a result of such knowledge. I did not know any other BOSS mark until this infringement case. Answer No. 16 None Answer No. 17 None Answer No. 18 Not Applicable Answer No. 19 Not Applicable Answer No. 20 Question not cleared. Answer No. 21 None Answer No. 22 None Answer No. 23 Betty Pu – Co-owner and wife of Masaru Igari Answer No. 24 No one Answer No. 25 None Answer No. 26 No one. All are answered by me with best of my knowledge. IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD _______________________________________ HUGO BOSS Trade Mark Management ) GmbH & Co. KG, ) ) Opposition No. 91178056 Opposer, ) ) Mark: CHILD BOSS v. ) Serial: 78/929,460 ) Masaru Igari, ) ) Applicant. ) ____________________________________)___ APPLICANT’S ANSWER TO OPPOSER’S REQUESTS FOR ADMINISSIONS Applicant, Masaru Igari, hereby files its Answer to Opposer’s Request for Admissions: The number of each answer is corresponding to the request number. Answer No. 1 Admitted Answer No. 2 Admitted Answer No. 3 Admitted Answer No. 4 Objection. The question is not clear. Does the opposer offer children’s clothes? If no, then my answer is Denied. Answer No. 5 Not Applicable. No goods or service has offered to anyone yet. Answer No. 6 Defendant lacks sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny. Answer No. 7 Defendant lacks sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny. Answer No. 8 Defendant lacks sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny. Answer No. 9 Defendant lacks sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny. Answer No. 10 Denied. Answer No. 11 Admitted, but not limited to. Answer No. 12 No goods or service has offered to anyone yet. Answer No. 13 No goods or service has offered to anyone yet. Answer No. 14 Defendant lacks sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny. Answer No. 15 Defendant lacks sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny. Answer No. 16 Denied Answer No. 17 Denied Answer No. 18 Denied Answer No. 19 No goods or service has offered to anyone yet. Answer No. 20 No goods or service has offered to anyone yet. Answer No. 21 No goods or service has offered to anyone yet. Answer No. 22 Defendant lacks sufficient knowledge or information of normal and ordinary channels to admit or deny. Answer No. 23 Admitted Answer No. 24 Denied. Answer No. 25 Admitted, but only “Hugo Boss” and I did not know any other BOSS mark. Answer No. 26 Defendant lacks sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny. Answer No. 27 Denied. Answer No. 28 Denied IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD _______________________________________ HUGO BOSS Trade Mark Management ) GmbH & Co. KG, ) ) Opposition No. 91178056 Opposer, ) ) Mark: CHILD BOSS v. ) Serial: 78/929,460 ) Masaru Igari, ) ) Applicant. ) ____________________________________)___ APPLICANT’S ANSWER TO OPPOSER’S DOCUMENT REQUESTS Applicant, Masaru Igari, hereby files its Answer to Opposer’s Document Requests: The number of each answer is corresponding to the document request number. Document Request No. 1 A copy of a letter from Office of the Secretary of State enclosed Document Request No. 2 A copy of a letter from Office of the Secretary of State enclosed Document Request No. 3 Child Boss is owned by Masaru Igari – Owner and his wife Betty Pu – Co-owner and there is no other a partner or employee at this moment Document Request No. 4 I do not have such document yet. I have just registered my company name and trademark so far. And this infringement case stops my next action for my business to move forward. Document Request No. 5 I do not have such document yet. I have just registered my company name and trademark so far. And this infringement case stops my next action for my business to move forward. Document Request No. 6 I do not have such document yet. I have just registered my company name and trademark so far. And this infringement case stops my next action for my business to move forward. Document Request No. 7 Not Applicable. I conducted the research myself by the following web-sites: www.register.com www.aplus.net http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe Document Request No. 8 Not Applicable. Document Request No. 9 Not Applicable. Document Request No. 10 Not Applicable. www.childboss.com and www.childboss.net are reserved by me since April 18, 2006, but they are not used and there is no content in each website due to this infringement case. I mention this since both websites include “childboss.” Document Request No. 11 Not Applicable. Document Request No. 12 Not Applicable. Document Request No. 13 Not Applicable. Document Request No. 14 Not Applicable. Document Request No. 15 Not Applicable. Document Request No. 16 Not Applicable. Document Request No. 17 Not Applicable. Document Request No. 18 Not Applicable Document Request No. 19 Not Applicable Document Request No. 20 Not Applicable Document Request No. 21 Not Applicable Document Request No. 22 Not Applicable Document Request No.