DOCSLIB.ORG

The Body in Culture, Technology & Society

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Body in Culture, Technology & Society Chris Shilling The Body in Culture, Technology & Society shilling prelims.qxd 01/09/2004 10:42 Page i The Body in Culture, Technology and Society i shilling prelims.qxd 01/09/2004 10:42 Page ii Theory, Culture & Society Theory, Culture & Society caters for the resurgence of interest in culture within contemporary social science and the humanities. Building on the her- itage of classical social theory, the book series examines ways in which this tradition has been reshaped by a new generation of theorists. It also pub- lishes theoretically informed analyses of everyday life, popular culture, and new intellectual movements. EDITOR: Mike Featherstone, Nottingham Trent University SERIES EDITORIAL BOARD Roy Boyne, University of Durham Mike Hepworth, University of Aberdeen Scott Lash, Goldsmiths College, University of London Roland Robertson, University of Aberdeen Bryan S. Turner, University of Cambridge THE TCS CENTRE The Theory, Culture & Society book series, the journals Theory, Culture & Society and Body & Society, and related conference, seminar and postgradu- ate programmes operate from the TCS Centre at Nottingham Trent University. For further details of the TCS Centre's activities please contact: Centre Administrator The TCS Centre, Room 175 Faculty of Humanities Nottingham Trent University Clifton Lane, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK e-mail: [email protected] web: http://tcs.ntu.ac.uk Recent volumes include: Critique of Information Scott Lash Liberal Democracy 3.0 Stephen P. Turner French Social Theory Mike Gane Sex and Manners Cas Wouters ii shilling prelims.qxd 01/09/2004 10:42 Page iii The Body in Culture, Technology and Society Chris Shilling SAGE Publicati ons London • Thousand Oaks • New Delhi iii shilling prelims.qxd 01/09/2004 10:42 Page iv © 2005 Chris Shilling First published 2005 Published in association with Theory, Culture & Society, Nottingham Trent University Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form, or by any means, only with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licenses issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers. SAGE Publications Ltd 6 Bonhill Street London EC2A 4PU SAGE Publications Inc 2455 Teller Road Thousand Oaks, California 91320 SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd B-42 Panchsheel Enclave Post Box 4109 New Delhi – 100 017 British Library Cataloguing in Publication data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0 7619 7123 8 ISBN 0 7619 7124 6 Library of Congress Control Number Available Printed in India at Gopsons Paper Ltd, Noida iv shilling prelims.qxd 01/09/2004 10:42 Page v Contents Acknowledgements vi 1 Introduction 1 2 Classical Bodies 24 3 Contemporary Bodies 47 4 Working Bodies 73 5 Sporting Bodies 101 6 Musical Bodies 127 7 Sociable Bodies 148 8 Technological Bodies 173 9 Conclusion 198 Bibliography 210 Author Index 235 Subject Index 242 v shilling prelims.qxd 01/09/2004 10:42 Page vi Acknowledgements Philip A. Mellor and Keith Tester have been valuable sources of support and critical insight, while this study has also been improved by the comments of Ian Burkitt, Mike Hardey, Caroline New and Pauline Leonard. At Sage Publications, Chris Rojek provides all the encourage- ment and good advice one would want from an editor, and thanks also to Ian Antcliff and and Kay Bridger for their assistance during the pro- duction process. The Theory, Culture & Society editorial group continue to provide valued support for my work, while the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences of the University of Portsmouth grant- ed to me a period of sabbatical leave so that I could complete this book. The support that I have received since starting this project, which has been several years in the making, also came in other guises. I am extremely grateful to Xulong Lee for his ongoing help and expertise, and thanks also to Richard Gulliver for his assistance. Max and Katie made this period of time so much more fun than it would otherwise have been, while I want to dedicate this book to my wife, Debbie, for her love, friendship and support. vi Ch1.qxd 01/09/2004 10:43 Page 1 1 Introduction Social theories of the body have exerted an enormous influence on the social sciences and humanities in the past two decades. From being a subject of marginal academic interest, the intellectual significance of the body is now such that no study can lay claim to being comprehensive unless it takes at least some account of the embodied preconditions of agency and the physical effects of social structures. In sociology, discussions of embodiment pervade general theoretical works and specialist sub-disciplinary studies. Indeed, a recognition that its subject matter includes thinking, feeling bod- ies, rather than disembodied minds unaffected by their senses and habits, has become central to the sociological imagination. Despite these advances, however, clear portraits of the body’s status, generative capacities, and receptivity to structural forces, remain frustratingly elusive within most accounts of contemporary society. It is against this background that this book is intended to be a theoreti- cal and substantive contribution to the study of the body, as well as to social theory and sociological research more generally, and is addressed to the problems that still confront this area. In what follows, I aim to do the fol- lowing: (a) account for the enigmatic nature of embodiment in social the- ory; (b) suggest that classical sociological writings converged around a hitherto neglected view of the body as a multi-dimensional medium for the constitution of society; (c) critically examine recent approaches to the subject; and (d) undertake a series of substantive analyses of the body and the econ- omy, culture, sociality and technology. These four aims are related in that this classical convergence, that I characterize as a form of corporeal realism, provides us with a framework that can be used to reduce the analytical elu- siveness of the body and overcome some of the theoretical limitations of recent approaches. It also allows us to investigate the strongly held concerns about the subjugation of the embodied subject that characterize these recent approaches. This opening chapter is designed to explore in more detail the enigmatic nature of the body in social theory, before outlining the framework adopted in this study and introducing the reader to the main themes informing the rest of the book. The Rise of the Enigmatic Body In accounting for the ubiquitous yet elusive nature of the body in modern thought, the first aim of this book is to examine how the physical subject has come to possess an exceptional academic popularity, yet still seems to fade away when we ask the question ‘What is the body?’. In terms of its pop- ularity, there has been a breathtaking explosion of interest in the subject of Ch1.qxd 01/09/2004 10:43 Page 2 The Body in Culture, Technology and Society the body since the early 1980s. However, academic interest was stimulated initially by social trends and analyses which helped position the body as sig- nificant to a range of other subjects of established intellectual significance. Several strands of social thought and analytical perspectives assisted this early rise of the body, and it is important to revisit and re-examine the most important of them here as they help explain why embodiment became so ubiquitous yet remains such a contested and slippery subject. This rise of interest in the body represents the centrifugal stage in the recent develop- ment of the area as it attaches the subject to a wide variety of disparate agendas. It contrasts with the somewhat more centripetal trend that has emerged in recent years (when several broad perspectives emerged as dom- inant resources for examining embodiment) that I examine later in this Introduction, but has not yet receded completely and continues to inform developments in the area. First, analysts of consumer culture highlighted the commercialized body as increasingly central to people’s sense of self-identity, a shift that was asso- ciated with a corresponding change in the structure of advanced capitalist societies in the second half of the twentieth century. During this period, there was a move away from the focus on hard work in the sphere of pro- duction coupled with frugality in the sphere of consumption, towards an ethos which encouraged hard work and hedonistic consumption (Featherstone, 1982). The body’s status as ubiquitous sign in advertising cul- ture, and the proliferation of production oriented toward leisure, helped promote an emphasis on the achievement of an appearance and a degree of physical control commensurate with the display of a hyper-efficient ‘per- forming self’. Theorists of consumer culture analysed these developments through the related prisms provided by Tönnies’s Gemeinschaft/Gesellschaft distinction and Durkheim’s mechanical/organic solidarity distinction. Pasi Falk (1994: 12–13, 36), for example, argued that the boundaries of the late modern self had become detached from the bonds of collective physical rituals, and cen- tred around individualizing consumption acts focused on the ‘bodily surface and its sensory openings’; a development clearly associated with the rising influence of consumerism. This distinction between the collectively deter- mined body of the pre-modern era, and the individualized body of the late modern era, also underpinned the studies of Giddens (1991) and Turner (1984); analyses which focus in very different ways on the socio-political contexts in which consumer culture developed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cultivating an “Ideal Body” in Taijiquan and Neigong
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article “Hang the Flesh off the Bones”: Cultivating an “Ideal Body” in Taijiquan and Neigong Xiujie Ma 1,2 and George Jennings 3,* 1 Chinese Guoshu Academy, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu 610041, China; [email protected] 2 School of Wushu, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu 610041, China 3 Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff CF23 6XD, Wales, UK * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)2-920-416-155 Abstract: In a globalized, media-driven society, people are being exposed to different cultural and philosophical ideas. In Europe, the School of Internal Arts (pseudonym) follows key principles of the ancient Chinese text The Yijinjing (The Muscle-Tendon Change Classic) “Skeleton up, flesh down”, in its online and offline pedagogy. This article draws on an ongoing ethnographic, netnographic and cross-cultural investigation of the transmission of knowledge in this atypical association that combines Taijiquan with a range of practices such as Qigong, body loosening exercises and meditation. Exploring the ideal body cultivated by the students, we describe and illustrate key (and often overlooked) body areas—namely the spine, scapula, Kua and feet, which are continually worked on in the School of Internal Arts’ exercise-based pedagogy. We argue that Neigong and Taijiquan, rather than being forms of physical education, are vehicles for adult physical re-education. This re-education offers space in which mind-body tension built over the life course are systematically Citation: Ma, X.; Jennings, G. “Hang released through specific forms of attentive, meditative exercise to lay the foundations for a strong, the Flesh off the Bones”: Cultivating powerful body for martial artistry and health.
    [Show full text]
  • The Material Turn, Praxiography, and Body History
    Humanities 2014, 3, 546–566; doi:10.3390/h3040546 OPEN ACCESS humanities ISSN 2076-0787 www.mdpi.com/journal/humanities Article Beyond Cultural History? The Material Turn, Praxiography, and Body History Iris Clever and Willemijn Ruberg Department of History and Art History, Utrecht University, Drift 6, 3512 BS Utrecht, The Netherlands; E-Mails: [email protected] (I.C.); [email protected] (W.R.) External Editor: Victoria Thompson Received: 24 March 2014; in revised form: 27 August 2014 / Accepted: 16 September 2014 / Published: 9 October 2014 Abstract: The body came to be taken seriously as a topic of cultural history during the “corporeal” or “bodily” turn in the 1980s and 1990s. Soon, however, critique was raised against these studies’ conceptualization of the body as discursively shaped and socially disciplined: individual bodily agency and feeling were felt to be absent in the idea of the material body. This article critically analyzes new approaches in the field of body history, particularly the so-called “material turn”. It argues that the material turn, especially in the guise of praxiography, has a lot to offer historians of the body, such as more attention to material practices, to different kinds of actors and a more open eye to encounters. Potential problems of praxiographical analyses of the body in history include the complicated relationship between discourses and practices and the neglect of the political and feminist potential of deconstructive discourse analyses. However, a focus on the relationship between practices of knowledge production and the representation of the body may also provide new ways of opening up historical power relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Soziologie – Sociology in the German-Speaking World
    Soziologie – Sociology in the German-Speaking World Soziologie — Sociology in the German-Speaking World Special Issue Soziologische Revue 2020 Edited by Betina Hollstein, Rainer Greshoff, Uwe Schimank, and Anja Weiß ISBN 978-3-11-062333-8 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-062727-5 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-062351-2 ISSN 0343-4109 DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110627275 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For details go to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Library of Congress Control Number: 2020947720 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2021 Betina Hollstein, Rainer Greshoff, Uwe Schimank, and Anja Weiß, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com Contents ACompanion to German-Language Sociology 1 Culture 9 Uta Karstein and Monika Wohlrab-Sahr Demography and Aging 27 FrançoisHöpflinger EconomicSociology 39 AndreaMaurer Education and Socialization 53 Matthias Grundmann Environment 67 Anita Engels Europe 83 Monika Eigmüller Family and IntimateRelationships 99 Dirk Konietzka, Michael Feldhaus, Michaela Kreyenfeld, and Heike Trappe (Felt) Body.Sports, Medicine, and Media 117 Robert Gugutzerand Claudia Peter Gender 133 Paula-Irene Villa and Sabine Hark Globalization and Transnationalization 149 Anja Weiß GlobalSouth 165 EvaGerharz and Gilberto Rescher HistoryofSociology 181 Stephan Moebius VI Contents Life Course 197 Johannes Huinink and Betina Hollstein Media and Communication 211 Andreas Hepp Microsociology 227 RainerSchützeichel Migration 245 Ludger Pries Mixed-Methods and MultimethodResearch 261 FelixKnappertsbusch, Bettina Langfeldt, and Udo Kelle Organization 273 Raimund Hasse Political Sociology 287 Jörn Lamla Qualitative Methods 301 Betina Hollstein and Nils C.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender, Bodies and Cyberstalking: Embodying Theory, Developing Methodology
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by ResearchArchive at Victoria University of Wellington GENDER, BODIES AND CYBERSTALKING: EMBODYING THEORY, DEVELOPING METHODOLOGY BY RACHEL WILLIAMS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN CRIMINOLOGY SCHOOL OF SOCIAL AND CULTURAL STUDIES VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON 2009 ABSTRACT The exponential growth of advanced communication technologies has corresponded with diverse opportunities for criminal offending within this arena. New forms of deviance are supported by the unique characteristics of the Internet environment, whilst pre-existing crimes are also paralleled online. Research indicates that content related offences, including cyberstalking and online sexual harassment, mirror offline gender disparities, although research addressing this disparity is minimal. The disparate victimisation of women, and the characteristics of cyberstalking, facilitates the recognition of this offence as a gendered form of harassment and the development of a theoretical framework responsive to this disparity. However, current theories addressing the Internet often display concepts concurrent with what is commonly referred to as the online disembodiment thesis. These concepts, namely the promotion of an absolute demarcation between the online and offline environment and the notion that bodies can be transcended online, are problematic when addressing the online victimisation of women as feminist theorists have located much of women’s power in the centrality of the body. To inform the development of a gendered framework appropriate for an assessment of cyberstalking this thesis rejected the online disembodiment thesis, alternatively employing the theories of the body to develop a theoretical framework appropriate for an examination of cyberstalking.
    [Show full text]
  • The Body Also Has a History: a Critical Aesthetics for Arts Education
    ACCESS: CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN EDUCATION 2009, VOL. 28, NO. 2, 72–80 The body also has a history: A critical aesthetics for arts education Michael Peters University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign [Adjunct RMIT Melbourne] ABSTRACT This paper begins by providing a brief introduction to Foucault’s work on the body. In the next section it reviews the feminist encounter with Foucault’s work focusing on the political technology of the body before examining feminist appropriations of Foucault and the relation between aesthetics and the body. In the final section of the paper, I make some preliminary remarks about the relation of body theory to art education. Introduction The body also has a history:1 this is a central insight that emerged during the 1980s on the basis of a set of insights derived from the intersection of phenomenology, art history, psychoanalysis, historical criticism, feminist and gender studies, and the whole gamut of postmodern studies. These approaches had simultaneously embraced the linguistic, the cultural and the spatial turns, and together prefigured the rise of a new multi-disciplinarity that based its objects of study outside traditional disciplinary boundaries (see Peters, 1999). Body theory and criticism emerged in the 1980s and was given a particular orientation by Michel Foucault’s work that helped to make ‘the body’ a category of social and political analysis and an object of historical analysis. Foucault drew his lessons from the phenomenological tradition of French thought on the body (Sartre, Beauvoir, Merleau-Ponty) that emphasised its materiality and the socio-cultural specificity of its embodiedness, inscribed by power relations and at the same time marked by gender, race and class.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mind-Body Problem in the Origin of Logical Empiricism
    From: Logical Empiricism: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, Paolo Parrini, Wesley C. Salmon, and Merrilee H. Salmon (eds.). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press 2003, 233-262. Repr. in Michael Heidelberger, Nature from Within: Gustav Theodor Fechner and His Psychophysical Worldview. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, chapter five. The Mind-Body Problem in the Origin of Logical Empiricism: Herbert Feigl and Psychophysical Parallelism ––––––––– MICHAEL HEIDELBERGER Universität Tübingen It is widely held that the current debate on the mind-body problem in analytic philosophy began during the 1950s at two distinct sources: one in America, deriving from Herbert Feigl's writings, and the other in Australia, related to writings by U. T. Place and J. J. C. Smart (Feigl [1958] 1967). Jaegwon Kim recently wrote that "it was the papers by Smart and Feigl that introduced the mind-body problem as a mainstream metaphysical Problematik of analytical philosophy, and launched the debate that has continued to this day" (Kim 1998, 1). Nonetheless, it is not at all obvious why these particular articles sparked a debate, nor why Feigl's work in particular came to play such a prominent part in it, nor how and to what extent Feigl's approach rests on the logical empiricism he endorsed. Following the quotation cited, Kim offers an explanation backed by a widespread (mis)conception of logical empiricism. He claims that work con- cerning the mind-body relation done prior to Feigl and Smart dealt either with the logic of mental terms – as Wittgenstein's and Ryle's work had – and there- fore missed the point, or lacked the sophistication of our modern approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Dance in Prison: Narratives of the Body, Performativity, Methodology, and Criminology
    chapter 4 Dance in Prison: Narratives of the Body, Performativity, Methodology, and Criminology Sylvie Frigon and Laura Shantz Since the 1990s, researchers have been developing new methodolo- gies that transcend theory/method divisions, research categories, and disci- plinary backgrounds. Feminist methodologies fi rst blurred boundaries and made these transitions over thirty years ago (see Harding 1997; Harding and Norberg 2005; Reinharz 1992; Smith 1974; Stanley and Wise 1983, 1993); new, radical methodologies continue this tradition. Early feminist methods sought to reinsert women into research – as theorists, researchers, and active subjects. They changed research perspectives, moving from research “on women” to researching issues that are important to women (Harding and Norberg 2005; Smith 1974). These researchers challenged traditional knowledge – sometimes by shifting the focus of study and sometimes by employing diff erent research methodologies. While this created challenges to their legitimacy and accept- ance (see Harding 1986, 1997; Smith 1974), the techniques and topics explored forever changed the shape of academic research. Donna Haraway (1988) and others critically examined the entire research process, including the idea of an objective “truth,” noting that all truths are partial and situated in that they emerge from particular philosophical, epistemological, social, and moral pos- itions. Feminist methodological contributions also include the situated re- searcher, who refl exively engages with the research and both aff ects and is aff ected by it, and active subjects, who are given agency within research. Feminist research also includes a refl exive understanding of the larger environ- ment in which research is created, including spheres and axes of privilege and oppression.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf File of Introduction
    intro.qxd 01/02/2005 15:50 Page 1 Introduction It is claimed that the discipline of sociology has led the way in ’bringing the body (back) in’ (Frank 19, 1990) to social and political analysis. John O’Neill’s Five Bodies and Bryan S. Turner’s The Body and Society offered dis- tinct explanations for the body’s neglect within sociological (and other social scientific) scholarship and social theory and presented sustained analyses of perspectives and approaches that could serve the aim of developing a sociological understanding of the human body. The body is now a central and distinct arena of theoretical debate and empirical research within sociology and is increasingly the focus of interdisciplinary scholarship across cultural studies and feminist theory. However, while cultural studies are more likely to engage with sociology, feminist theory has been more disinclined to do so. Moreover, feminists and non-feminists conducting empirical research on the human body within disciplinary boundaries (for instance, within sociology) and working across such boundaries habitually cite the work of feminists who are known as theo- rists, such as Judith Butler, Elizabeth Grosz, Moira Gatens and Luce Irigaray. The theoretical insights produced by a relatively small group of women located within elite cultural Anglophone institutions has had immense impact on the direction and form of empirical research and more general scholarship concerning the body. Indeed, while there are now a considerable number of edited volumes that seek to bring together empir- ical feminist research on the body, e.g. judging by citation records, it would appear that feminist theories of the body are more likely to be accorded privilege within academic feminist communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Body & Society
    Body & Society http://bod.sagepub.com/ Beyond the Body/Mind? Japanese Contemporary Thinkers on Alternative Sociologies of the Body CHIKAKO OZAWA-DE SILVA Body & Society 2002 8: 21 DOI: 10.1177/1357034X02008002002 The online version of this article can be found at: http://bod.sagepub.com/content/8/2/21 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University Additional services and information for Body & Society can be found at: Email Alerts: http://bod.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://bod.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://bod.sagepub.com/content/8/2/21.refs.html Downloaded from bod.sagepub.com at Open University Library on March 15, 2011 02silva (ds) 31/5/02 1:03 pm Page 21 Beyond the Body/Mind? Japanese Contemporary Thinkers on Alternative Sociologies of the Body CHIKAKO OZAWA-DE SILVA Western sociology has for a long time been dominated by a rationalistic concept of the human actor, whereby it is assumed that people are essentially thinking subjects. Social action in such a model is carried out by individuals behaving on the basis of rational choice and without reference to their feelings or physical qualities. Such a view is also often associated with the Cartesian assumption of the distinction between, and separation of, the mind and the body. Although there have been a few, mainly continental, philosophers (Merleau-Ponty is a conspicu- ous example) who have stressed the embodied nature of human subjects who interact in significant ways with space (we move, occupy physical space, bump into one another) and time (we think constantly about the past and the future, we age and have a finite lifespan), until recently few sociologists thought to incor- porate this perspective directly into their work.
    [Show full text]
  • Performativity and Performance: Representing the Tattooed Body. Mindy Elaine Fenske Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 2001 Performativity and Performance: Representing the Tattooed Body. Mindy Elaine Fenske Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Fenske, Mindy Elaine, "Performativity and Performance: Representing the Tattooed Body." (2001). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 402. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/402 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychophysical Parallelism *
    [To appear in a volume edited by Paolo Parrini and Wesley Salmon Logical Empiricism: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press 2003] The Mind-Body Problem in the Origin of Logical Empiricism: Herbert Feigl and Psychophysical Parallelism Michael Heidelberger Universität Tübingen It is widely held that the current debate on the mind-body problem in analytic philosophy be- gan during the 1950s at two distinct sources: one in America, deriving from Herbert Feigl's writings, and the other in Australia, related to writings by U. T. Place and J. J. C. Smart (Feigl [1958] 1967). Jaegwon Kim recently wrote that "it was the papers by Smart and Feigl that introduced the mind-body problem as a mainstream metaphysical Problematik of analyti- cal philosophy, and launched the debate that has continued to this day" (Kim 1998, 1). Nonetheless, it is not at all obvious why these particular articles sparked a debate, nor why Feigl's work in particular came to play such a prominent part in it, nor how and to what extent Feigl's approach rests on the logical empiricism he endorsed. Following the quotation cited, Kim offers an explanation backed by a widespread (mis)conception of logical empiricism. He claims that work concerning the mind-body rela- tion done prior to Feigl and Smart dealt either with the logic of mental terms – as Wittgen- stein's and Ryle's work had – and therefore missed the point, or lacked the sophistication of our modern approaches. One exception, C. D. Broad's laudable work, could not alter this, for it "unfortunately .
    [Show full text]
  • A Qualitative Study of Extraordinary Religious Healing Experiences in Norwegian Contexts
    religions Article Reinscribing the Lived Body: A Qualitative Study of Extraordinary Religious Healing Experiences in Norwegian Contexts Anne Austad 1,*, Marianne Rodriguez Nygaard 1 and Tormod Kleiven 2 1 Faculty of Theology, Diaconia and Leadership Studies, VID Specialized University, 0319 Oslo, Norway; [email protected] 2 Centre of Diaconia and Professional Practice, VID Specialized University, 0319 Oslo, Norway; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +47-2245-1910 Received: 2 September 2020; Accepted: 22 October 2020; Published: 30 October 2020 Abstract: Poor health often motivates people to engage in religious and spiritual approaches to healing. However, there is limited research on such experiences from a northern European perspective. This article investigates healing experiences related to Christian faith and practices in Norway by thematic analysis of 25 semi-structured interviews with individuals who have experienced healing of different ailments. In so doing, healing events across diverse contexts are characterised, and the results show that such experiences not only feature practices in which other people are present in prayer, preaching, and the laying on of hands, but also spontaneous extraordinary encounters with a divine being through visions and voices. The healing events are further described as experiences of transformational, powerful touch. In light of the lived body theory, these transformational experiences can be understood as re-inscriptions of health that are manifested in the intertwined bio–psycho–social–spiritual aspects of the body. Keywords: religious healing; extraordinary experiences; lived body; psychology of religion 1. Introduction Previous research has shown that poor health and suffering often motivate people to engage in religious and spiritual healing practices (Ammerman 2013, pp.
    [Show full text]