VICTORIAN BAR NEWS Summer 2008 / 2009 1 VICTORIAN BAR COUNCIL VICTORIAN BAR NEWS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
No. 146 SUMMER 2008 / 2009 Farewell Sir John Young WELCOMES CRIMINAL BAR ASSOCIATION DINNER PRO BONO AWARDS ISSN 0159-3285 BAR HOCKEY READERS’ COURSE REVISITED A BIT ABOUT WORDS WBA MEET AND GREET NATIONAL INDIGENOUS LEGAL CONFERENCE VICTORIAN BAR NEWS Summer 2008 / 2009 1 VICTORIAN BAR COUNCIL VICTORIAN BAR NEWS Bar Council Chairs of Standing Committees Editors Clerk of the Bar Gerard Nash QC, Paul Elliott QC G G John Digby QC* (Chairman) Applications Review Committee and Judy Benson G Michael J Colbran QC* (Senior Vice-Chairman) G Digby QC, G.J. Editorial Board D Mark K Moshinsky SC* (Junior Vice-Chairman) Clerking Committee Julian Burnside QC, Graeme Thompson D E William Alstergren* (Honorary Treasurer) G Colbran QC, M.J. D Jacob I Fajgenbaum QC* Editorial Secretary Council Committee L Phillip G Priest QC John Stevens G Colbran QC, M.J. H Timothy P Tobin SC Editorial Committee A Paul E Anastassiou SC Duty Barristers Scheme Committee Ian Freckelton SC, D Peter J Riordan SC D Alstergren, E.W. William F. Gillies, Carolyn Sparke, A Cameron C Macaulay SC Editorial Committee for In Brief and Georgina Schoff, Paul Duggan, Richard Brear, H Richard W McGarvie SC* Website News Section Carmela Ben-Simon, Catherine Button, D Scott W Stuckey (Assistant Honorary Treasurer) D McLeod SC, Ms F.M. Jennifer Digby, Noam Shifrin and G Sara L Hinchey* Equal Opportunity Committee Peter Lithgow (Book Reviews) F Matthew J Walsh D McLeod SC, Ms F.M. D Paul X Connor Design/production Ethics Committee F Kim J Knights Ron Hampton G Davies SC, J. G Kate J D Anderson* David Johns (Photography) B Michelle R Sharpe* Health and Wellbeing Committee Published by The Victorian Bar Inc. R Simon J Gannon L Priest QC, P. Owen Dixon Chambers F Benjamin J Murphy Human Rights Committee 205 William Street, Melbourne 3000. F Kim M Southey D Fajgenbaum QC, J.I. Registration No. A 0034304 S Indigenous Lawyers Committee *Executive Committee G Golvan SC, C.D. Opinons expressed are not necessarily those of the Bar Council or the Bar or Law Reform Committee of any person other than the author. Ethics Committee D Garde QC, AO, RFD, G. D Davies SC, J. (Chairman) Legal Assistance Committee Printed by Impact Printing C Meagher ED, QC, D.R. A Richards QC, A. 69 –79 Fallon Street, Brunswick Vic. 3056 G&J Willee RFD, QC, P.A. Legal Education and Training Continuing This publication may be cited as G&J Santamaria QC, J.G. Education Committee (2008/2009) 146 Vic B.N. D Titshall QC, M.R. D Ruskin QC, J. F Gobbo QC, J.H. Advertising A Manly SC, R.J. Legal Education and Training Readers’ Miriam Sved H McGarvie SC, R. Course Committee The Victorian Bar Inc. D Moshinsky, SC, M.K. B Hill QC, I.D. 205 William Street G&J Shwartz, A. New Barristers’ Standing Committee Melbourne 3000 P Williams, I.S. B Pitt, S.T. Telephone: (03) 9225 7943 D Kirton, C.E. Past Practising Chairmen’s Committee Fax: (03) 9225 6068 F Shiff, P.L. F Costigan QC, F.X. D Alstergren, E.W. Professional Standards Education Committee D Shaw, C.E. G&J Willee RFD, QC, P.A. Professional Standards Scheme Committee A Derham QC, D.M.B. Victorian Bar Dispute Resolution Committee S Heaton QC, M. 2 VICTORIAN BAR NEWS Summer 2008 / 2009 ISSN 0159-3285 No. 146 SUMMER 2008 / 2009 EDITORS’ BACKSHEET 22 John Mathew Edward Sutton 52 A bit about words 4 Farewell 23 Daniel Julius Pollak 53 Mo’ justis 55 WBA meet and greet CHAIRMAN’S OUTLOOK NEWS AND VIEWS 58 Measures adopted by the Bar to 7 Our strong Bar will face significant 24 Readers’ Course revisited assist parents challenges in 2009 29 Stolen 30 Announcement of Senior Counsel ATTORNEY-GENERAL’S COLUMN for 2008 10 Changing the court process SPORT 32 Readers’ Course photograph 59 Bar Hockey WELCOMES 34 National Indigenous Legal Conference 12 Master Simon Gardiner 36 Criminal Bar Association Dinner LAWYER’S BOOKSHELF 14 Judge Mark Taft 42 Verbatim 61 Book reviews 43 Pro Bono Awards OBITUARIES 46 Portrait of Sir Daryl Dawson 16 Farewell Sir John Young 51 Investment and superannuation 22 Philip Henry Napoleon Opas for barristers Cover: Portrait of Sir John Young Welcome: Master Welcome: Judge Criminal Bar Association Dinner National Indigenous Legal Conference Simon Gardiner Mark Taft Pro Bono Awards WBA meet and greet Bar Hockey VICTORIAN BAR NEWS Summer 2008 / 2009 3 EDITORS’ BACKSHEET Farewell COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS is some mindless conglomerate quite sepa- rate from the 20 million Australians who On Saturday 15 November last year The live in this country. Alternatively those Age reported that the DPP was calling for who are charged with criminal offences the abolition of committal proceedings on are somehow outside the ambit of this the basis that they no longer serve their concept of ‘community’. original purpose and that they are, effec- To abolish the principle of double jeop- tively, a waste of money and resources. ardy would mean that any person who has It appears that the DPP considers at any time been charged with, and acquit- that the present procedure provides ted of, an offence would have the possibil- an ineffective filter in that only a small ity of conviction for that offence hanging number of committal proceedings do over him or her for the rest of his or her not result in committal for trial and, in life. It would mean that the Crown could any case, the DPP has power to present a have a ‘dry run’ trial to ascertain the ambit person for trial even though a magistrate The experience of those who rely on of the defence and the defence evidence has refused to commit. Since the filter, rainwater tanks is that if the filter is not and then run its real trial at a later time. therefore, only removes a small percentage working properly, the normal remedy is to Big brother is big enough already – in of persons charged from the flow of the replace it or fix it. Seldom is the removal fact too big. Every time our law reformers criminal process, it should be abolished. of the filter seen as the desirable remedy. refer to the interests of the community, at There appear to be three objections to If magistrates at committal proceedings least one of the editors sees, superimposed this proposal. are not adopting a sufficiently rigorous upon that reference, a fascist symbol. (i) It cuts across the accepted principle approach to the Crown case, if accused Where the law does not stand between that the accused should have an persons who should be discharged at com- governmental power and the individual, it opportunity to cross-examine Crown mittal are being committed for trial, the is left only with the function of enforcing witnesses before trial: see Barton v R remedy lies in a tightening of the legislative conformity, ensuring that the minority (1980) 147 CLR 75 at 105–106, the requirements for committal or a more lib- comply with the wishes of the majority and views in which are reflected, effec- eral exercise of the nolle prosequi power. settling arguments between individuals. It tively, in the ‘Basha’ inquiry and in would seem, this is where our ‘reformers’ the enactment of s.11 of the Crimes ABOLITION OF ‘DOUBLE JEOPARDY’ are heading. (Criminal Trials) Act 1999; (ii) It will by reason of the ‘Basha’ princi- At the same time as the DPP talks about abolishing committals, the Attorney is ple and the operation of s.11 add con- THE DUTY OF COUNSEL siderably to the work of trial courts making noises about abolishing the ‘double – in effect, it will remove the commit- jeopardy’ principle. While it cannot be disputed that counsel’s tal to the County Court or Supreme One has to ask why there is this thrust primary duty is his or her duty to the court Court; to abolish the rights of the individual. It is or that that duty must prevail over the duty (iii) It assumes that the cost, anxiety and all done, of course, in the interests either of to the client, matters recently raised in stress of individual accused, who efficiency or ‘protection of the community’. CLE lectures seem to suggest that case under the present system would be It would seem that in the eyes of those who management considerations should pre- discharged at committal, is of little or would ‘reform’ the law in this way the com- vail over the duty to the client. This may no importance. munity is not composed of individuals but be a mistaken impression, but if it is not, it 4 VICTORIAN BAR NEWS Summer 2008 / 2009 represents a very clear departure from the others who indicate that the thrust of Bar working with Peter Heerey has continued principles of adversarial litigation. News is anti-feminist. with Gerry. Cases do take too long, not only because In respect of the publication of a letter Finally Judy Benson was appointed untenable points may be taken, but also in a recent issue of Bar News, one of our third editor in 2000. Many thought that because of inefficiency in preparation and correspondents took us to task saying the appointment of a female editor would the inability of some advocates to argue ‘Even the Herald-Sun checks its facts cause some problems for two male editors concisely or limit examination or cross- before publishing’. somewhat set in their ways. But quite the examination to the matters in issue. This A driver who has in excess of 1,200 contrary.