DOCSLIB.ORG

Heritage Settings Had Not Been Confirmed in Decision 45

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heritage Settings Had Not Been Confirmed in Decision 45 BEFORE THE CHRISTCHURCH REPLACEMENT DISTRICT PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Canterbury Earthquake (Christchurch Replacement District Plan) Order 2014 AND IN THE MATTER of the Natural and Cultural Heritage Stage 3 Proposal MEMORANDUM OF COUNSEL FOR CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL IN RELATION TO DECISION 45 NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE (PART) Topic 9.3 – Historic Heritage 23 November 2016 Barristers & Solicitors M G Conway / C G Coyle Telephone: +64-4-924 3511 Facsimile: +64-4-472 6986 Email: [email protected] / [email protected] DX SX11174 PO Box 2402 WELLINGTON 28609561_7.doc MAY IT PLEASE THE PANEL: 1. This memorandum is filed on behalf of the Christchurch City Council (Council) in relation to the Minor Corrections to Decision 45: Chapter 9 Natural and Cultural Heritage (part) Topic 9.3 Historic Heritage and Decision on Appendix 9.3.7.2 dated 8 November 2016, and the filing of planning maps in relation to Chapter 9. 2. As the Panel is aware, it has a power under clause 16 of Schedule 3 of the Order in Council to make minor corrections to its decisions and proposals. For ease of reference, clause 16 states: 16 Minor corrections (1) The hearings panel may, at any time, issue an amendment to a decision to correct a minor mistake or defect in a decision of the panel. (2) This power includes the power to amend or correct a proposal, provided that the amendment or correction is made before the proposal becomes operative in accordance with clause 16 of this order. 3. The Panel discussed the scope of this power in its decision to make minor corrections to Decision 9 Temporary Activities 6A, 6B and 6C.1 4. Because the Panel's jurisdiction has been canvassed previously, we do not repeat that discussion in detail here. In summary, clause 16 of Schedule 3 of the Order in Council is similar to, but not exactly the same as, clauses 16 and 20A of Schedule 1 of the RMA. Clauses 16 and 20A of Schedule 1 of the RMA use the words "minor error" rather than "minor mistake or defect". The Environment Court in Re an application by Christchurch City Council2 said: An error is simply a mistake or inaccuracy which has crept into the plan. The obvious example is a spelling mistake or reference to a wrong paragraph number where there can be no doubt what number is intended. It is analogous to the use of the slip rule in other Court Proceedings. Thus rule 12 of the District Courts Rules 1992 make provisions for correction of 1 Decision to Make Minor Corrections to Decision on Temporary Activities, dated 22 October 2015, at paragraphs [3] to [9]. The Panel also discussed what changes of "no more than minor effect" are for the purposes of clause 13(6) in its Decision 9 Temporary Activities 6A, 6B and 6C at para [19] to [25]. 2 Re an application by Christchurch City Council [1996] NZEnvC 97. 2 28609561_7.doc a judgment which contains a clerical mistake or error arising from an accidental slip or omission. The fundamental principle applicable to the use of the slip rule is that it may only be used to correct a slip in the "expression" of a judgment not the "content". 5. The Environment Court determined a change would be within clause 16 of Schedule 1 of the RMA if "the draftsperson seeks only to clarify what is clearly intended by the document and does not in any way make a change to it which alters its meaning".3 6. The Council would be happy to provide further submissions on the Panel's jurisdiction if that would assist. 7. In the course of reviewing the minor corrections decisions the Council has identified further minor errors, shown in Attachment A. 8. Decision 51, at paragraph [249], directed the Council to provide updated planning maps for Chapter 9. Whilst preparing these planning maps the Council noted some instances where the extent of heritage settings had not been confirmed in Decision 45. Attachment B shows items where the Council respectfully requests a decision on the extent of the heritage setting from the Independent Hearings Panel. 9. Attachment C shows a merged schedule of Central City heritage items and Christchurch City and Banks Peninsula heritage items, as directed by the Panel in paragraph 46 of the Minor Corrections to Decision 45. DATED this 23st day of November 2016 __________________________________ M G Conway / C G Coyle Counsel for Christchurch City Council 3 At page 11. 3 28609561_7.doc Attachment A – Minor Corrections Corrections sought to Decision 45 [page of Amendment requested decision] Definitions Make a minor amendment in the definition of Alteration of a heritage item after i. for clarity: Pages 14 and 16 “i. …New buildings, structures or features.; and Alteration of a heritage item excludes …” Amend definition of Heritage Setting for clarity and as sought in Council’s Supplementary Closing submissions on definitions dated 2 September 2016: means an entry in Appendix 9.3.7.2 - Schedule of Significant Historic Heritage in which, together with the associated heritage item, … c. gardens, lawns, mature trees and landscaping, water features, historic landforms; access, walk and cycle ways, circulation, paths and paving; d. access, pedestrian access ways and cycle ways, circulation, paths and paving; d. e. open space; and e. f. spatial relationships Amend definition of Heritage Upgrade works for clarity: “… b. fire protection; and c. provision of access,; and 28609561_7.doc Corrections sought to Decision 45 [page of Amendment requested decision] 9.3.3 Provide capital letters for "Heritage Areas" within 9.3.3 b. ii.: Page 26 b. The planning maps identify sites that contain a heritage item and heritage setting, and heritage areas. Reference should also be made to: i. Appendix 9.3.7.2 - Schedule of Significant Historic Heritage; ii. Appendix 9.3.7.3 – Schedule of hHeritage aAreas; 9.3.3 Delete the reference to P4 in 9.3.3 i. as sought in the Minor Corrections memorandum dated 12 October, as Rule P4 relates Page 27 to scheduled heritage items not to heritage settings, and 9.3.3 i. relates only to heritage settings: Activities are permitted in heritage settings scheduled in Appendix 9.3.7.2 (subject to other rules in this Plan), except for new buildings in heritage settings (Rule 9.3.4.3 RD2) and temporary structures and signage in heritage settings (Rule 9.3.4.1 P4, P5 and P6). 9.3.3 Amend 9.3.3 k. i. and iii., and make a minor amendment to 9.3.3 m.: Page 27 k. The following exemptions apply in relation to Rule 9.3.4 – Activity Status Tables i. For the Annandale Woodlshed heritage setting (12 Starvation Gully Road) Rule 9.3.4.3 RD1 and RD2 shall not apply to the modification of, or new stockyards within, the heritage setting shown on Heritage Aerial Map 476. iii. For the Hagley Park heritage item (HID 1395) as identified on the planning maps and in Appendix 9.3.7.2, Rule 9.3.4 – Activity Status Tables shall not apply, other than to heritage items and heritage settings within Hagley Park individually scheduled in Appendix 9.3.7.2. 2 28609561_7.doc Corrections sought to Decision 45 [page of Amendment requested decision] 9.3.6.1 Amend Rule 9.3.6.1 for consistency: Page 36 e. The extent to which the works are in accordance with the principles in Policy 9.3.2.4(b), and whether the proposal: i. is supported by a conservation plan or expert heritage report; and ii. the extent to which it is consistent with the Heritage Statement of Significance and Conservation Plan and the ICOMOS New Zealand Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Heritage Value (ICOMOS New Zealand Charter 2010). 9.3.7.6 Amend Appendix 9.3.7.6 – Certification of Non-Heritage Fabric for consistency: Page 52 In sub-clause 1.4 amend to "Heritage Statement of Significance" In sub-clause 2.1 amend to “Heritage Sstatement of Ssignificance” In sub-clause 2.2 add closing bracket: "The dates of site visit(s) undertaken, (which must include a visit in the period subsequent to any previous modifications of the fabric or area being assessed)." In sub-clause 2.4, insert an "'s" after heritage professional: "2.4 Confirmation that in the heritage professional's opinion, and having regard to Clauses 1 and 2…" Appendix Amendment to explanatory note to schedules to remove heritage places, shown in Attachment C and replace with 9.3.7.2 ‘scheduled historic heritage’. In addition for clarity insert ‘heritage’ before item as shown: Page 56 Explanatory note: Where heritage settings contain multiple heritage items, these have been grouped together using thicker lines in the table below and a collective name for the heritage places scheduled historic heritage is also noted. 3 28609561_7.doc Corrections sought to Decision 45 [page of Amendment requested decision] Appendix Item 1373 - Correction to the Godley Head battery listing to remove "and setting" 9.3.7.2 Item 1179 – Correction to the Oxford St Lyttelton cobblestone gutters and setting address There are a number of other corrections to planning map references, shown in Attachment C in purple text. Appendix Amend incorrect reference to Chapter 14: 9.3.7.4.1 Page 56 Chapter Zone Activity Type of Exemption Chapter 14 Residential New 14.9.2.1 P1224b, Place of Scale of activity Residential Neighbourhood P12d, P12f(i) assembly Residential Zones coherence Schedule 2 Amend incorrect address of St Peter’s Church Appendix St Peter’s 9.3.7.2 Church Page 71 24 Main Part of Upper St Peter's 355 193 Highly 19 30; South 25, 25A Riccarton Church signific H18 Road Yaldhurst Graveyard and ant Road Setting 2524 24 Main Part of Upper St Peter's 1285 193 Highly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • II~I6 866 ~II~II~II C - -- ~,~,- - --:- -- - 11 I E14c I· ------~--.~~ ~ ---~~ -- ~-~~~ = 'I
    Date Printed: 04/22/2009 JTS Box Number: 1FES 67 Tab Number: 123 Document Title: Your Guide to Voting in the 1996 General Election Document Date: 1996 Document Country: New Zealand Document Language: English 1FES 10: CE01221 E II~I6 866 ~II~II~II C - -- ~,~,- - --:- -- - 11 I E14c I· --- ---~--.~~ ~ ---~~ -- ~-~~~ = 'I 1 : l!lG,IJfi~;m~ I 1 I II I 'DURGUIDE : . !I TOVOTING ! "'I IN l'HE 1998 .. i1, , i II 1 GENERAl, - iI - !! ... ... '. ..' I: IElJIECTlON II I i i ! !: !I 11 II !i Authorised by the Chief Electoral Officer, Ministry of Justice, Wellington 1 ,, __ ~ __ -=-==_.=_~~~~ --=----==-=-_ Ji Know your Electorate and General Electoral Districts , North Island • • Hamilton East Hamilton West -----\i}::::::::::!c.4J Taranaki-King Country No,", Every tffort Iws b«n mude co etlSull' tilt' accuracy of pr'rty iiI{ C<llldidate., (pases 10-13) alld rlec/oralt' pollillg piau locations (past's 14-38). CarloJmpllr by Tt'rmlilJk NZ Ltd. Crown Copyr(~"t Reserved. 2 Polling booths are open from gam your nearest Polling Place ~Okernu Maori Electoral Districts ~ lil1qpCli1~~ Ilfhtg II! ili em g} !i'1l!:[jDCli1&:!m1Ib ~ lDIID~ nfhliuli ili im {) 6m !.I:l:qjxDJGmll~ ~(kD~ Te Tai Tonga Gl (Indudes South Island. Gl IIlllx!I:i!I (kD ~ Chatham Islands and Stewart Island) G\ 1D!m'llD~- ill Il".ilmlIllltJu:t!ml amOOvm!m~ Q) .mm:ro 00iTIP West Coast lID ~!Ytn:l -Tasman Kaikoura 00 ~~',!!61'1 W 1\<t!funn General Electoral Districts -----------IEl fl!rIJlmmD South Island l1:ilwWj'@ Dunedin m No,," &FJ 'lb'iJrfl'llil:rtlJD __ Clutha-Southland ------- ---~--- to 7pm on Saturday-12 October 1996 3 ELECTl~NS Everything you need to know to _.""iii·lli,n_iU"· , This guide to voting contains everything For more information you need to know about how to have your call tollfree on say on polling day.
    [Show full text]
  • Council 12. 03. 2015 Communities, Housing And
    Clause 20 COUNCIL 12. 03. 2015 COMMUNITIES, HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 10. 2. 2015 A meeting of the Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee was held in Committee Room 1 on 10. 02. 2015 at 8.04am PRESENT: Councillor Andrew Turner (Chairperson) Councillors Glenn Livingstone (Deputy Chairperson), Jimmy Chen, Jamie Gough, Yani Johanson, Ali Jones and Paul Lonsdale APOLOGIES: Apology received from Councillor Lonsdale for lateness, who arrived at 8.06am and was absent for clauses 4 and 14. Apology received from Deputy Mayor Buck for lateness who arrived at 8.10am and was absent for clauses 4, 14 and part of clause 5.1. Deputy Mayor Buck later left the meeting at 11.42am and returned at 12.43pm, and was absent for part of clause 2 and clauses 3, 15 and 16. Apologies for lateness and early departure were received from Councillor Gough who arrived at 9.35am and left at 12.56pm, and was absent for clauses 4, 14, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, part of 5.4 and part of clause 17. Councillor Jones arrived at 8.35am and left at 12.50pm and was absent for clauses 4 and 14, part of clause 5.1, and part of clause 17. The Committee reports that: PART A - MATTERS REQUIRING A COUNCIL DECISION 1. CENTRAL CITY LANDMARK HERITAGE GRANT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE ALLOCATION OF THE CARRY FORWARD OF THE 2013/2014 FUNDS. Contact Contact Details Chief Planning Officer Chief Planning Officer Y EA Diane Campbell, 8281 responsible: Strategy and Planning Officer responsible: Natural Environment and Y PA Michelle Oosthuizen, 8812 Heritage Unit Manager Author: Brendan Smyth, Acting Y 8934 Heritage Team Leader 1.
    [Show full text]
  • ICOMOS NZ News April 2014 Page 2
    ICOMOS New Zealand NEWS April 2014 ISSN 0113-2237 www.icomos.org.nz $2.5 million boost to restore Provincial Buildings he Christchurch Earthquake Appeal Trust and the Ministry T for Culture and Heritage recently announced they will jointly provide funding of $2.5 million for the Canterbury Provincial Council Buildings, to be used towards restoration and reconstruction of its Armagh and Durham street stone towers. When completed, this work is intended to enable the adjacent wooden buildings to re-open for public use as soon as possible. Reynolds David Photo: The Armagh Street tower in better days. In This issue ICOMOS NZ Travel Scholarship 2 A word from the Chair 2 New Members 3 Canterbury Tales 4 Heritage New Zealand arrives 6 Hidden hints at St Mike’s 6 Jim Kerr’s gift 7 2014 Conferences & Training 8 Media matters 10 A summer stroll 11 Photo: Kevin Jones Kevin Photo: Punishing pace tells: Laura Kellaway, Becky Harfield, Robyn Burgess, David Reynolds, Jenny May, David Bade, Amanda Ohs and Phillip Hartley enjoying a Christchurch easterly after a bout of disorientation. A word from the Chair ICOMOS New Zealand Travel Scholarship Announced ICOMOS NZ News April 2014 Page 2 providing input into the Takapuneke toward a PhD proposal as part of his Niue Conservation Plan. Her input included research. research into the cultural landscape history of Takapuneke, identification of The early 1990s saw a boom in Auckland site elements of Pakeha significance, CBD development and Bev’s focus mapping changes to the landscape over turned to employment as a contractor time and developing policies for for Bioresearches Ltd, grounding her landscape heritage values.
    [Show full text]
  • Jubilee Clock Tower and Setting – Victoria Street, Between
    DISTRICT PLAN –LISTED HERITAGE PLACE HERITAGE ASSESSMENT – STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE HERITAGE ITEM NUMBER 530 JUBILEE CLOCK TOWER AND SETTING –VICTORIA STREET, BETWEEN PETERBOROUGH STREET AND MONTREAL STREET/95 VICTORIA STREET, CHRISTCHURCH PHOTOGRAPH: M.VAIR-PIOVA, 11/12/2014 HISTORICAL AND SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE Historical and social values that demonstrate or are associated with: a particular person, group, organisation, institution, event, phase or activity; the continuity and/or change of a phase or activity; social, historical, traditional, economic, political or other patterns. The Jubilee Clock Tower has high historical and social significance for its connection with provincial government in Canterbury and Queen Victoria’s Diamond Jubilee. The clock and ironwork superstructure were originally commissioned for the Canterbury Provincial Government Buildings in 1859. On arrival from England, the superstructure was found to be Page 1 too heavy for its intended site. The ironwork was stored at the Provincial Government Buildings and then in the Christchurch City Council yards for nearly forty years. In 1897 the Diamond Jubilee of Queen Victoria's reign was celebrated in the city, and the superstructure and clock were grafted to a new stone base to create a memorial clock tower at the intersection of High, Lichfield and Manchester Streets. The increasing volume of traffic at this intersection resulted in a decision to relocate the tower to its present site in Victoria Street in 1930-1931. The clock tower has been extensively restored on at least three occasions: 1977-1978, 2003-2004 and following the Canterbury Earthquakes of 2010-2011. The clock tower sustained significant damage in the earthquakes and its bent finial became a popular post-earthquake image.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual List Registered Engineers
    PROFESSIONAL AND TRADE LISTS 1997 The New Zealand azette OF THURSDAY, 20 JUNE 1991 WELLINGTON: MONDAY, 24 JUNE 1991 - ISSUE NO. 93 ANNUAL LIST OF REGISTERED ENGINEERS . 1998 NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 93 Annual List of Registered Engineers Acting pursuant to section 4 of the Engineer's Registration Amendment Act 1944, I, Philip Ralph Burdon, Minister of Commerce, published this list of registered engineers who for the time being are holders of annual practising certificates, showing the particulars entered on the register in respect of each engineer. The certificates will expire on 31 March 1992. The list was provided to me by the Engineers Registration Board of New Zealand pursuant to section 4 (1) of the Engineers Registration Amendment Act 1944. · Dated at Wellington this 18th day of June 1991. PHILIP BURDON, Minister of Commerce. ENGINEERS REGISTRATION BOARD OF NEW ZEALAND List of Registered Engineers as al 1 April 1991 and Expiring 31 March 1992 Explanation Particulars of each column are as fo llows: Column 1-This contains the name and qualifications of each engineer who at the date of the list is the holder of an annual practising certificate issued under section 3 of the Engineers Registration Amendment Act 1944. An engineer who has been registered is required to hold a current annual practising certificate in order to retain the full rights of registration. Column 2-This gives the postal address, either business or residential, as on the application for Annual Practising Certificate. Column 3-This shows the date of original registration. It is also to be noted that corporate membership of one of the recognised British Engineering Institutions entitles the holder to be styled as a "Chartered Engineer", but this information is omitted from the list.
    [Show full text]
  • About the SCAPE Public Art Season 2019 & SCAPE's Legacy Public
    About the SCAPE Public Art Season 2019 & SCAPE’s Legacy Public Artworks Phil Price Anton Parsons Julia Morison Judy Millar Mischa Kuball David McCracken Seung Yul Oh Nucleus 2006 Passing Time 2010/11 Tree Houses for Swamp Call me Snake 2015 Solidarity Grid 2013/15 Diminish and Ascend 2014 Conduct Cumulus 2017 Dwellers 2013 Nau mai, haere mai – welcome to SCAPE’s Season 2019, a citywide festival that ignites Ōtautahi Christchurch’s outdoor SCAPE Public Art Season 2019 spaces with stunning new contemporary artworks and events 5 October - for all. 16 November Join us for our 21st year and enjoy more than a dozen new temporary artworks by local and internationally renowned Ka tipu te whaihanga artists, plus re-visit SCAPE’s impressive base of 15 legacy Creativity will strengthen works – pictured here. Playful strategy or a battle of wills: SCAPE Public Art 2019 takes the iconic game Rock, Paper, Scissors as its starting point. The artworks that populate the city make us think and feel: about what home means, the emotional resonance of materials and the patterns and rituals that help us make sense of the world. Running from 5 October to 16 November, SCAPE Season 2019’s Managing Curator Emma Bugden has selected over a dozen artworks for the city in spring from local, national and international artists. We invite locals and visitors to Art Explore. Regan Gentry Rachael Dewhirst Neil Dawson Peter Atkins Antony Gormley Antony Gormley Nathan Pohio Sēmisi Fetokai Potauaine Flour Power 2008 Kaleidoscopic Nights 2012 Fanfare 2004/15 Under Construction - STAY 2015/16 STAY 2015/16 Raise the anchor, unfurl the VAKA ‘A HINA 2019 The artworks are linked via the SCAPE Public Art Walkway Chaos and Order sails, set course to the centre and are complemented by a stimulating assortment of free interactive activities which you can read more about below.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Bibliography of Published Sources on Christchurch
    Local history resources An annotated bibliography of published sources on the history of Christchurch, Lyttelton, and Banks Peninsula. Map of Banks Peninsula showing principal surviving European and Maori place-names, 1927 From: Place-names of Banks Peninsula : a topographical history / by Johannes C. Andersen. Wellington [N.Z.] CCLMaps 536127 Introduction Local History Resources: an annotated bibliography of published sources on the history of Christchurch, Lyttelton and Banks Peninsula is based on material held in the Aotearoa New Zealand Centre (ANZC), Christchurch City Libraries. The classification numbers provided are those used in ANZC and may differ from those used elsewhere in the network. Unless otherwise stated, all the material listed is held in ANZC, but the pathfinder does include material held elsewhere in the network, including local history information files held in some community libraries. The material in the Aotearoa New Zealand Centre is for reference only. Additional copies of many of these works are available for borrowing through the network of libraries that comprise Christchurch City Libraries. Check the catalogue for the classification number used at your local library. Historical newspapers are held only in ANZC. To simplify the use of this pathfinder only author and title details and the publication date of the works have been given. Further bibliographic information can be obtained from the Library's catalogues. This document is accessible through the Christchurch City Libraries’ web site at https://my.christchurchcitylibraries.com/local-history-resources-bibliography/
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Christchurch Replacement District Plan Hearings Panel
    BEFORE THE CHRISTCHURCH REPLACEMENT DISTRICT PLAN HEARINGS PANEL IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Canterbury Earthquake (Christchurch Replacement District Plan) Order 2014 AND IN THE MATTER of the Natural and Cultural Heritage Stage 3 Proposal MEMORANDUM OF COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL 7 MARCH 2016 Barristers & Solicitors Simpson Grierson M G Conway / M J Jagusch Telephone: +64-4-499 4599 Facsimile: +64-4-472 6986 Email: [email protected] / [email protected] DX SX11174 PO Box 2402 WELLINGTON MAY IT PLEASE THE PANEL: 1. This memorandum is filed on behalf of the Christchurch City Council (Council) in response to the Minute of the Panel dated 3 March 2016 regarding the Natural and Cultural Heritage Proposal (Minute). This memorandum addresses matters relating to Topic 9.3: Historic Heritage and Topic 9.4: Significant Trees. TOPIC 9.4: SIGNIFICANT TREES 2. The Minute granted leave for the Council to file a memorandum by 7 March 2016 confirming any request for leave to file supplementary evidence. Mediation on Thursday 3 March was helpful, and the Council does not consider that supplementary evidence or further formal engagement with interested parties will be necessary in relation to Topic 9.4 except to the extent envisaged by the timetable proposed below. While not all matters have been resolved, the Council anticipates that, by the time closings are filed, the points of disagreement will be reduced and clearly defined. The proposed process set out below is similar to that which was sought for Topic 9.1: Indigenous Biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Knowledge of Significant Māori Sites, Landmarks and Concepts Accessible
    MAKING KNOWLEDGE OF SIGNIFICANT MĀORI SITES, LANDMARKS AND CONCEPTS ACCESSIBLE GEOG309 RESEARCH METHODS IN GEOGRAPHY FINAL PROJECT REPORT KATE WALSH, MATT SAMPSON, LIBBY PROCTOR, DARREN BOTHA 13 OCTOBER 2014 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 3 Literature Review .................................................................................................................... 4 Methods ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Site Selection ...................................................................................................................... 6 Survey Methods .................................................................................................................. 8 Findings and Discussion .......................................................................................................... 9 Attitudes towards Māori Cultural Knowledge and its Communication......................... 9 The Five sites: Māori cultural knowledge ................................................................... 13 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 16 Acknowledgements ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 9.3 Historic Heritage
    9.3 Historic heritage 9.3.1 Introduction a. This introduction is to assist the lay reader to understand how this chapter works and what it applies to. It is not an aid to interpretation in a legal sense. b. This sub-chapter relates to the management of the Christchurch District’s significant historic heritage. The values of heritage items, heritage settings and heritage areas of the Christchurch District are identified in a series of schedules appended to this sub-chapter and shown on the Planning Maps. c. The objective, policies, rules, standards, matters of control and matters of discretion in this sub-chapter are intended to provide for the protection of significant historic heritage, while also recognising the impact of the Canterbury earthquakes on heritage items and the effect of engineering and financial factors on the ability to retain, restore, and continue using them. d. The provisions in this chapter give effect to the Chapter 3 Strategic Directions Objectives. 9.3.2 Objective and policies 9.3.2.1 Objectives 9.3.2.1.1 Objective – Historic heritage a. The overall contribution of historic heritage to the Christchurch District’s character and identity is maintained through the protection and conservation of significant historic heritage across the Christchurch District in a way which: i. enables and supports: A. the ongoing retention, use and adaptive re-use; B. the maintenance, repair, upgrade, restoration and reconstruction; and C. in some situations, the demolition; of historic heritage; and ii. recognises the condition of buildings, particularly those that have suffered earthquake damage, and the effect of engineering and financial factors on the ability to retain, restore, and continue using them.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence of Helen Beaumont
    BEFORE THE CHRISTCHURCH REPLACEMENT DISTRICT PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Canterbury Earthquake (Christchurch Replacement District Plan) Order 2014 AND IN THE MATTER of the Natural and Cultural Heritage Proposal (Stage 3) STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF HELEN MARY BEAUMONT ON BEHALF OF CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL’S BROADER RESPONSE TO NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE 2 DECEMBER 2015 Barristers & Solicitors M G Conway / W M Bangma Telephone: +64-4-499 4599 Facsimile: +64-4-472 6986 Email: [email protected] DX SX11174 PO Box 2402 WELLINGTON CCC - NCH (Stage 3) - Helen Beaumont - 2 December 2015.doc CONTENTS CLAUSE PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................1 2. SCOPE .............................................................................................................................2 3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................2 4. COMMUNITY OUTCOMES FOR CHRISTHCHURCH ...................................................2 5. CULTURAL HERITAGE ..................................................................................................3 6. BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY ...........................................................................................5 7. SURFACE WATER STRATEGY .....................................................................................6 8. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE STRATEGY ...............................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Christchurch Restored
    6, Safety Guide When riding near tram tracks stay aware. If crossing, ride diagonally across the tracks whilst remaining upright. Slow down but maintain momentum. Signal when turning and stopping, and do regular shoulder checks to remain aware of other vehicles around you. On shared pedestrian/cycle paths keep to the left in single file. Overtake when safe to do so. Politely alert pedestrians from behind of your presence. Abide by the road rules at all times. You are responsible for your own safety. Double-check at 65' <kae intersections that it's safe to go — don't just follow the person 4,c) in front of you. Ride a safe distance out from parked cars — if you can touch the car with your outstretched hand, you're too close. se, •$-<" Tram track 40."<ycle track c)-> `0o - cc" c.P ▪ 60, c> • Q., upeca ck*, 44' HERITAGE Week l323 OCTOBER 2017 HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUH ERE TAONGA %SW Heritage buildings to look out for: Canterbury Built to commemorate people who died in Canterbury Earthquake Memorial earthquakes: 2017. Designed by Grega Vezjak. Unlisted Arts Centre Built for Canterbury College, Christchurch Boy's High and Category 1 Christchurch Girl's High: between 1877-1929. Architects include Benjamin Mountfort and Samuel Hurst Seeger, Gothic The Bridge of Built to commemorate Canterbury soldiers who fought in Revival & Oxbridge style. Restoration well underway, buildings Remembrance VVVVI: 1923. Designed by Gummer and Prouse. Repaired and opening in stages. Category 1 strengthened, completed 2016. Prioritised according to damage,cost,safety and significance.' Our City Otautahi Built as Christchurch City Council's Municipal Chambers: Shand's Emporium Built by Harry Johnstone, solicitor.
    [Show full text]