DOCSLIB.ORG

Financial Underwriting: Red Light, Yellow Light, Green Light?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Financial Underwriting: Red Light, Yellow Light, Green Light? Financial Underwriting: Red Light, Yellow Light, Green Light? Mike Hesse Assistant Chief Underwriter September 15, 2017 Overview What Color is the Financial Traffic Light? . Stop- No offer until financial issues resolved . Proceed – with caution Secure more information . Proceed Financially Risk Level is a Continuum Fundamental Questions . Why? . What is in force? . Other applications pending? . Ultimate Total Line? 3 What Factors Determine the Color? . Need . Investment . Radically new, bold, creative sale . Clear documentation is key . Company / Amount / Issue Date . Purpose of Insurance . Replacement . Company / Amount / Issue Date . Additional / Competitive 4 What Factors Determine the Color? Needs-Based Protection Against Loss and Current-Projected . Income replacement . Final expenses . Mortgage . Estate taxes (“death taxes”) . Retirement planning /deferred compensation . Estate equalization 5 What Factors Determine the Color? Needs-Based Protection Against Loss and Current-Projected . Stock redemption / buy-sell . Key person replacement . Loan coverage . Charitable contribution . Kitchen sink- liquidity . Can consider ‘stacking’ needs (income replacement + mortgage + final expense) 6 What Factors Determine the Color? Investment and Financial Planning . Asset protection . Alternative to low-interest CDs, volatile stock market . Gift tax exclusion transfer to trust to purchase life insurance on child who married poorly and gambled in the stock market 7 What Factors Determine the Color? Investment and Financial Planning . Income with Respect to Decedent (IRA- income tax due at death) . Guaranteed / current / illustrated rate of return . Estate planning / transfer during lifetime . Inside build up advantage for life insurance 8 What Factors Determine the Color? Investment and Financial Planning . Tax mitigation, deferral, avoidance . STOLI, CHOLI, Surrogate insured . Commission rebating / premium advances / early lapses . Life insurance policy settlements (sales) . Windfall probability / potential 9 What Factors Determine the Color? Income Replacement Does that hat fit? . Adjustable or Fitted? Current/future needs . Was Head measured? Needs analysis . Within sizing guide? Formula . How much hair under the hat? Earnings stability . Will the hat still fit after ‘haircut?’ Financial setback . How often does client change hats? Replacement 10 What Factors Determine the Color? Estate Planning and Funding the Premium . Current income . Assets- Liquid? Qualified? . Current budget . Liabilities? . Selling assets? . Trust funded? . Premium financed . Illustration assumptions . Medical assessment/COI 11 What Factors Determine the Color? Estate Planning-Final Goal? Protect or Create Estate? . Projection . Rate of return . Life expectancy . Calculator used . Guaranteed rates . Investment track record . Asset control/inheritance . Protection or creation? . Estate calculator 12 What Factors Determine the Color? Key Person-Gauging “Economic Loss” . Who is Key Person? • Rainmaker • Sole proprietor • Technical expertise, patent holder, special skills/experience Pinterest.com . Low compensation currently BUT • Stock options • Equity share of the company will explode • What is potential economic loss to business? • Lost sales? Customer relationships? Inability to finance debt? • High cost to replace? Business Continuation 13 What Factors Determine the Color? Buy/Sell . Know all owners and percentage of ownership . Coverage proportionate to ownership Quantafinancials.com . Need 1- 2 years business financials (trend) . Establish the value of the business . Buy/sell agreement should be in place 14 A Word About the Proposed Insured… . Occupation (Training required? Job market?) . Income: earnings history, ability to document . Net worth- composition . Reality check – income in relation to occupation income average / median . Source of premium • Income + current liquid assets in relation to premium . Beneficiary designated • Relationship • Insurable interest • Financial loss 15 How Was the Sale Made Life Insurance Sales Process . What was Producer’s role in sale? . In overall financial planning? . Relationship with proposed insured? . Fiduciary Duty vs. Suitability • Client’s interests first, no conflict of interest . How was sale developed? . What facts/analysis were used to determine Financial need? 16 Fiduciary Responsibility The Depp Riddle: Who Should Watch the Money? . February 1, 2017 - NY Times Business Section Article . Earned $650M in past 30 years . Hired Management Group to oversee his finances in 1999 . Needs to sell significant assets to settle debts and for divorce settlement . Suing advisors- instead of protecting assets, they “engaged in years of gross mismanagement, self-dealing, and at times, actual fraud.” . Firm counter-sued Depp, arguing that it “did everything possible to protect Depp from his own irresponsible and profligate spending” 17 Fiduciary Responsibility The Depp Riddle: Who Should Watch the Money? . Spending: $2M per month; has purchased 14 homes, a French town, a chain of islands in Bahamas, $5.6M interest of overdue taxes, $3M fire cremated remains of Hunter S. Thompson out of a special cannon . Depp didn’t keep track of his accounts, read documents before signing, or question late tax payments for 16 consecutive years . 2015 President Obama- Fiduciary Responsibility “You want to give financial advice, you need to put your client’s interests first” . Others in industry oppose- places entire burden of responsibility on advisors rather than client, who should pay attention, will end up costing consumer more for financial advice . People should bear more responsibility for monitoring their finances and life 18 Financial Considerations . Financial verification . Financial projections . Financial justification . Financial fantasy . Financial limits • Jumbo limit • Binding limit • Retention limit 19 Financial Justification Rule of Formulas . Income replacement multiples . Percentage of income allocated to life insurance premium . Percentage of liquid current assets allocated to insurance premium . Estate planning – net worth projection “Normal” Amount . Key Person multiples . Stock redemption / buy-sell formulas . Deferred compensation formulas . Charitable giving formulas . Where does amount requested fall on the continuum based on formula? 20 Financial Verification Representations –Most Underwriting is Based on This Information . Life insurance contract - evidence . Application representations- part of contract? Need to amend? . Inspection Reports . Telephone-interview conducted by Underwriting 21 Financial Verification ● Representations ● Validity ● Depth of Verification ● . Representation on application . Producer’s report or commentary . Inspection or tele-interview . Mainstream fits the formula assumptions . Consistency . Does it make sense? 22 Financial Verification Expert Opinion . CPA/accountant • Credential Verification • Terms/history of association . Independent Financial Planner/Attorney . Vested interest in sale (Fiduciary? Suitability? Commission?) 23 Financial Verification Documents . 1040 Tax return . 4506-T signed- Tax Transcript . W-2 statements . Personal financial compilations . Brokerage statements . Appraisals / business valuations by experts . Business financial statements (BFS) 24 When Do You Need to be Really Sure Before Proceeding? Walkway or Highway? . Less financial/medical volatility and risk exposure . MORE: High dollar risk, volatility, reputational risk, regulatory risks . Potential for Fraud 25 Is the Amount Justified? What Additional Information Might be Helpful? . How solid are the financials? • Break down of net worth into assets and liabilities? • Assets value been verified as fact? If not, can they be? . Named beneficiaries of policies in force? • Agent states she’ll drop the $500,000 term policy, if necessary, to justify the coverage (expires in 2019) • Does the $100,000 initial premium influence your decision? o Where’s the $100,000 coming from? 26 Financial Documentation Does the Documentation Support the Financial Decision? . The application . Financial supplement that may or may not be signed/dated . The producer . The producer in role as CPA/financial advisor . Inspection or phone interview . Credit reports: ‘risky’ financial behavior not just bankruptcy 27 Financial Documentation Does the Documentation Support the Financial Decision? . CPA- Credential verified or not? Existing relationship established? . Private bankers- Willing to talk? Being compensated on the sale? . Attorneys knowledgeable about finances and planning - Interest in outcome? . Business financial statements- Does it match Representations? 28 Financial Documentation Personal . Property records searches . Brokerage statements . Zillow.com search results . Income tax returns or transcripts . Personal Financial Statement prepared by CPA or Attorney 29 Tax Returns The Good, the Bad, the Ugly . Supporting schedules needed? • Depends on application $ amount, sources of income • Income-based financial justification/verification • Net worth-based financial justification/verification/inference • Beneficiary-personal or business oName of business oTrust-personal insurance or is trust used for business purpose? . Joint return: whose income is it? . Extraordinary gains, losses (and tax impact) . Average income vs. increasing income 30 Federal Tax Returns Reading the 1040…and Assorted Schedules . Salaries . Interest . Dividends and Distributions . Capital gains . Sole proprietor business income . Partnership,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Frs 102 Factsheet 6 Business Combinations
    FRS 102 FACTSHEET 6 BUSINESS COMBINATIONS Business combinations A business combination is defined as the bringing together of separate entities or businesses into one reporting entity and may be structured in a number of ways for legal, taxation or other reasons. It may involve the purchase by an entity of the equity of another entity, the purchase of all the net assets of another entity, the assumption of the net liabilities of another entity, or the purchase of some of the net assets of another entity that together form one or more businesses. Section 19 Business Combinations and Goodwill sets out the requirements for business combinations. This section also includes the requirements for group reconstructions, however, this is not covered in this factsheet. This factsheet has been prepared to provide a high level overview to entities applying FRS 102 that undertake a business combination for the first time covering the following: • An outline of the purchase method • The separation of intangible assets from goodwill • Illustrative disclosures This factsheet has been prepared by FRC staff and provides high level guidance to entities applying FRS 102 that undertake a business combination for the first time. It should not be relied upon as a definitive statement on the application of the standard nor is it a substitute for reading the detailed requirements of FRS 102. FRS 102 Factsheet 6 1 December 2018 The Purchase Method Key FRS 102 references The purchase method is the required accounting treatment for the vast majority of business 19.6, 19.7 combinations1 and involves the following steps: 1) Identify an acquirer This is the entity which obtains control of other combining entities or businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuation Issues to Consider for Large Block Minority Shareholder Redemptions Jeffrey S
    Shareholder Forensic Analysis Insights Valuation Issues to Consider for Large Block Minority Shareholder Redemptions Jeffrey S. Burns and Nathan P. Novak The purpose of this discussion is to identify certain issues to consider when performing a valuation analysis for the purpose of a closely held company shareholder redemption. Specifically, the focus of this discussion is on certain qualitative and quantitative factors that commonly arise when a closely held company is going through the process of redeeming or buying out an ownership interest of a significantly large but noncontrolling shareholder. Several considerations that are unique to large block noncontrolling shareholder redemptions are discussed below. Additionally, an example is provided to illustrate how certain of the issues can occur and can be handled in a hypothetical, but realistic, situation. NTRODUCTION such as if a shareholder claims he or she is being I oppressed by the company and a court orders that A shareholder redemption, as that term is used company to redeem the oppressed shareholder’s throughout this discussion, occurs when a share- shares. holder (or otherwise owner) of a company sells his or her shares back to the company. The shares may This discussion focuses on the valuation issues be retired or may be distributed among the remain- that arise during a litigious shareholder redemp- ing shareholders. tion, such as the issues related to the dissociation of an owner. Further, there are certain issues that Ultimately, the result is the same either way: are unique to the redemption of a noncontrolling 1. There will be one less shareholder. shareholder that holds a significantly large block of the company stock.
    [Show full text]
  • FR Y-9C, FR Y-9LP, FR Y-9SP, FR Y-9CS and FR Y-9ES; OMB No
    Supporting Statement for Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9C, FR Y-9LP, FR Y-9SP, FR Y-9CS and FR Y-9ES; OMB No. 7100-0128) Summary The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, under delegated authority from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), proposes to revise, without extension,1 the following mandatory reports for implementation in March and June 2009. (1) the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9C; OMB No. 7100-0128) and (2) the Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Small Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9SP; OMB No. 7100-0128). This family of reports also contains the following mandatory reports, which are not being revised: (1) the Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Large Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9LP; OMB No. 7100-0128), (2) the Financial Statements for Employee Stock Ownership Plan Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9ES; OMB No. 7100-0128), and (3) the Supplement to the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9CS; OMB No. 7100-0128). Pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, the Federal Reserve requires bank holding companies (BHCs) to provide standardized financial statements to fulfill the Federal Reserve’s statutory obligation to supervise these organizations. BHCs file the FR Y-9C and FR Y-9LP quarterly, the FR Y-9SP semiannually, the FR Y-9ES annually, and the FR Y-9CS on a schedule that is determined when the supplement is used. The Federal Reserve proposes the following revisions to the FR Y-9C effective March 31, 2009: (1) new data items and revisions to existing data items on trading assets and liabilities, (2) new data items associated with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Unpacking the Myths and Mysteries of Chapter 14
    Unpacking the Myths and Mysteries of Chapter 14 Christine Quigley ∙ Schiff Hardin LLP Nathan Brown ∙ Proskauer Rose LLP May 6, 2016 1. Code § 2701: The First of the Special Valuation Rules1 a. Generally, Code § 2701 applies any time an individual “transfers” an equity interest in a privately held entity to a “member of the transferor’s family,” if, immediately after such transfer, the transferor or one or more “applicable family members” holds an equity interest in the entity that is classified as an “applicable retained interest.”2 b. If Code § 2701 applies, the gift tax value of the transferred interest is determined under the so-called “subtraction method.”3 In its most simple form, the subtraction method determines the gift tax value of the transferred equity interest by subtracting the value of all equity interests in the entity held by the transferor (and applicable family members) immediately after the transfer from the aggregate value of all equity interests in the entity held by the transferor (and applicable family members) immediately before the transfer. c. If the retained equity interest is an applicable retained interest, its value for purposes of applying the subtraction method is zero (the “zero value rule”).4 The result of the zero value rule is that, for gift tax purposes, the transferor is treated as transferring not only the actual gifted interest, but all applicable retained interests as well. This can result is a significant, unexpected gift tax liability. d. Code § 2701 is riddled with defined terms that must be fully understood before one can properly determine whether Code § 2701 applies.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Economic Value Added
    Understanding Economic Value Added By David Harper (Editor In Chief - Investopedia Advisor) http://www.investopedia.com/university/EVA/ Thanks very much for downloading the printable version of this tutorial. As always, we welcome any feedback or suggestions. http://www.investopedia.com/investopedia/contact.asp Table of Contents 1) Introduction 2) Economic Value Added: Overview 3) Calculating NOPAT 4) Calculating Invested Capital 5) Pulling It All Together: Calculating And Understanding Economic Value Added 6) What Does Economic Value Added Really Mean? 7) Conclusion Introduction From a commercial standpoint, Economic Value Added (EVA™) is the most successful performance metric used by companies and their consultants. Although much of its popularity is a result of able marketing and deployment by Stern Stewart, owner of the trademark, the metric is justified by financial theory and consistent with valuation principles, which are important to any investor's analysis of a company. To many, the EVA™ metric (also known as "economic profit") basks in a mystique of complexity. But this tutorial will show you that this complexity is only an illusion. In fact, the entire metric is a development of three simple ideas: cash is king; some expense dollars are really investments in "disguise"; and equity capital is expensive. To help you understand EVA™ and its components, we devote each chapter of this tutorial to exploring a different conceptual aspect of economic value added (EVA™) and demonstrating the associated calculations. Over the course of these chapters, we build an EVA™ calculation for the Walt Disney Co (DIS), a publicly traded company, using recent financial statements. And, at the end of this study of EVA™, we compare it to other performance metrics.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated Financial Statements
    332 Accounting Standard (AS) 21 Consolidated Financial Statements Contents OBJECTIVE SCOPE Paragraphs 1-4 DEFINITIONS 5-6 PRESENTATION OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 7-8 SCOPE OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 9-12 CONSOLIDATION PROCEDURES 13-27 ACCOUNTING FOR INVESTMENTS IN SUBSIDIARIES IN A PARENT’S SEPARATE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 28 DISCLOSURE 29 TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS 30 Consolidated Financial Statements 307 Accounting Standard (AS) 21 Consolidated Financial Statements1 (This Accounting Standard includes paragraphs set in bold italic type and plain type, which have equal authority. Paragraphs in bold italic type indicate the main principles. This Accounting Standard should be read in the context of its objective and the General Instructions contained in part A of the Annexure to the Notification.) Objective The objective of this Standard is to lay down principles and procedures for preparation and presentation of consolidated financial statements. Consolidated financial statements are presented by a parent (also known as holding enterprise) to provide financial information about the economic activities of its group. These statements are intended to present financial information about a parent and its subsidiary(ies) as a single economic entity to show the economic resources controlled by the group, the obligations of the group and results the group achieves with its resources. Scope 1. This Standard should be applied in the preparation and presentation of consolidated financial statements for a group of enterprises under the control of a parent. 2. This Standard should also be applied in accounting for investments in subsidiaries in the separate financial statements of a parent. 3. In the preparation of consolidated financial statements, other Accounting Standards also apply in the same manner as they apply to the separate 1It is clarified that AS 21 is mandatory if an enterprise presents consolidated financial statements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Process of Valuation – Placing Value on Your Business
    Article: Placing value on your business The process of valuation – Placing value on your business On a regular basis, business owners, investors and experienced bankers look for a simple way to determine business value: a rule of thumb or formula. Hoping to avoid the expense and trouble of hiring a professional valuator, a value formula common to the business type is used; thereby assuming determination of a company’s value can’t be complicated. While using a rule of thumb may be a considered alterative in developing a rough test price, it provides a weak form of market comparison for business value; relying solely on this approach poses inherent problems. However, the rule of thumb approach typically employs a multiple of cash flow (or EBITDA = Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) and/or a multiple of revenues. Business valuation is the act or process of determining value of a business enterprise or ownership interest therein. Valuation of a security interest in a closely held business is a difficult process due to the lack of an active free trading market. Because of the absence of such a market, an underling notion in valuing closely held businesses is found in the investment value principle. The principle suggests the purchase of an equity interest in a closely held business should be viewed like any other investment. In essence, the “investor” not only expects to receive the initial investment back, but also receive a fair return on the investment commensurate to the risk incurred. The investment value principle can be express as a formula, illustrated as follows: Investment Value Principle Benefit Value = Risk Hodges & Hart, LLC Page 1 Certified Public Accountants Article: Placing value on your business Where, Value = the investment value of the business (present value).
    [Show full text]
  • Business Combinations and Changes in Ownership Interests
    25263 bd IFRS3 IAS27:25263 IFRS3/IAS27 bd 4/7/08 10:02 Page a Business combinations and changes in ownership interests A guide to the revised IFRS 3 and IAS 27 Audit.Tax.Consulting.Financial Advisory. 25263 bd IFRS3 IAS27:25263 IFRS3/IAS27 bd 4/7/08 10:02 Page b Contacts Global IFRS leadership team IFRS global office Global IFRS leader Ken Wild [email protected] IFRS centres of excellence Americas Robert Uhl [email protected] Asia Pacific Hong Kong Melbourne Stephen Taylor Bruce Porter [email protected] [email protected] Europe-Africa Copenhagen Johannesburg London Paris Jan Peter Larsen Graeme Berry Veronica Poole Laurence Rivat [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Deloitte’s www.iasplus.com website provides comprehensive information about international financial reporting in general and IASB activities in particular. Unique features include: • daily news about financial reporting globally. • summaries of all Standards, Interpretations and proposals. • many IFRS-related publications available for download. • model IFRS financial statements and checklists. • an electronic library of several hundred IFRS resources. • all Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu comment letters to the IASB. • links to several hundred international accounting websites. • e-learning modules for each IAS and IFRS – at no charge. • complete history of adoption of IFRSs in Europe and information about adoptions of IFRSs elsewhere around the world. • updates on developments in national accounting standards. 25263 bd IFRS3 IAS27:25263 IFRS3/IAS27 bd 4/7/08 10:02 Page c Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Summary of major changes 1 1.2 Convergence of IFRSs and US GAAP 3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues on Recognition, Measurement and Impairment of Goodwill
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Issues on recognition, measurement and impairment of goodwill Bunea-Bontaş, Cristina Aurora and Petre, Mihaela Cosmina Tibiscus University from Timisoara May 2009 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18135/ MPRA Paper No. 18135, posted 26 Oct 2009 18:40 UTC ISSUES ON RECOGNITION, MEASUREMENT AND IMPAIRMENT OF GOODWILL LECTURER CRISTINA BUNEA-BONTAS, PH.D. ASSISTANT MIHAELA PETRE, PH.D. GRADUANT “CONSTANTIN BRANCOVEANU” UNIVERSITY, PITESTI THE FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT MARKETING OF ECONOMIC BUSINESS, BRAILA Abstract: Investors and their advisers have to asses how the activities of the acquirer and its acquired business develop following a business combination. Due to a complexity of business activities this is a challenging exercise. Certainly, one of the major challenge concerns the goodwill. Is it an asset? How can it be measured? Which are the implications on fair image of financial position and performances? Therefore, the accounting treatment of goodwill involves applying professional judgment in terms of meeting criteria for its recognition as an intangible asset, but also related to the initial measurement and its impairment. IFRS 3 (Revised) “Business Combinations” will create significant changes in accounting for goodwill, and further more, for business combinations. Keywords: goodwill, fair value, impairment loss, full goodwill, non-controlling interest JEL classification: M410 Accounting Companies use their resources or assume debts in order to purchase or to generate internal items such as licenses, intellectual properties, trademarks, import quotas, franchises, devoted customers, knowledge about the market, contracts with distributors and other resources which are intangible as well. Intangible assets are identifiable non-monetary assets, without physical substance, held for use for the production of goods or services, to be rented to third parties or be used for administrative purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Roadmap to Accounting for Noncontrolling Interests
    A Roadmap to Accounting for Noncontrolling Interests July 2020 The FASB Accounting Standards Codification® material is copyrighted by the Financial Accounting Foundation, 401 Merritt 7, PO Box 5116, Norwalk, CT 06856-5116, and is reproduced with permission. This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication. The services described herein are illustrative in nature and are intended to demonstrate our experience and capabilities in these areas; however, due to independence restrictions that may apply to audit clients (including affiliates) of Deloitte & Touche LLP, we may be unable to provide certain services based on individual facts and circumstances. As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte & Touche LLP, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Deloitte Tax LLP, and Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP, which are separate subsidiaries of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of our legal structure. Copyright © 2020 Deloitte Development LLC. All
    [Show full text]
  • Common Discounts Used in Valuations of Closely Held Businesses By: Joe Romagnoli, CPA/ABV, CVA, Partner
    Common Discounts Used in Valuations of Closely Held Businesses By: Joe Romagnoli, CPA/ABV, CVA, Partner Whenever valuing a minority ownership, i.e. less than 50% ownership of a closely held business, it is necessary to include discounts to the final valuation to reflect the minority interest and lack of marketability. These discounts, typically used in fair market value calculations, reflect the negative effects of lack of control and inability to sell or liquidate the minority interest at will. An owner of a less than 5% interest, in any entity, usually will not maintain any substantial control over the organization; especially if another owner maintains a majority interest. Without control of the company, the minority owner cannot control wages, dividends, or other financial policies for the company. Minority interest discounts range from 20% to 40% and applications tend to lean towards 30% to 35%. Fair Market Value The fair market value method of valuing an entire interest are often based on comparisons of the market values of recent sales of entire entities or whole pieces of property. There are certain marketability differences between the fair market value of an entire entity and a partial interest in a thinly traded entity that lacks a regularly traded market. For example, an owner of a less than 5% interest in a publicly traded security can know at all times the market value of his or her holdings. They can sell that holding on virtually a moment’s notice and receive cash net of brokerage fees within several working days. Liquidating a less than 5% interest of a privately held entity, in comparison, would be a more costly and time consuming process than liquidating stock in publicly traded firms.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting Considerations for UP-C Transactions Accounting for Common Umbrella Partnership–C Corporation Transactions
    September 11, 2018 Accounting considerations for UP-C transactions Accounting for common umbrella partnership–C corporation transactions Summary The use of an umbrella partnership–C corporation (UP-C) structure is an increasingly common way for owners of a pass-through entity to engage in certain transactions, like raising capital in public markets or business combinations, while retaining the tax benefits of owning a pass-through entity or even recognizing added tax benefits. In an UP-C structure, pre-transaction owners of the pass-through entity retain direct ownership in the pass-through entity, while new investors own an indirect interest in the pass-through entity through a Subchapter C corporation created to facilitate the transaction. UP-C transactions present certain unique accounting challenges, including how the Subchapter C corporation should account for the acquisition of the pass-through entity and for noncontrolling interests that might arise from the transaction, as well as how the transaction impacts the historical equity presentation, including earnings-per-share. While there are various legal and tax implications that an entity should consider before using an UP-C structure, this bulletin focuses only on the main accounting challenges arising from UP-C transactions. Contents A. Overview of UP-C structures .................................................................................................. 2 Description of a typical UP-C IPO ............................................................................................2
    [Show full text]