DOCSLIB.ORG

What Does a Diagnosis of Brain Death Mean to Family Members Approached About Organ Donation? a Review of the Literature

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Does a Diagnosis of Brain Death Mean to Family Members Approached About Organ Donation? a Review of the Literature CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by e-Prints Soton What does a diagnosis of brain death mean to family members approached about organ donation? A review of the literature Background —What a diagnosis of brain stem death (the term used in the United Tracy Long, RN, PhD, Kingdom) or brain death (the term used in the United States) means to the family C. Psychol, Magi Sque, RN, members of potential organ donors is an important issue to explore as biomedicine PhD, RNT, DipNEd, moves to expand the range of end-of-life technologies that, potentially, blur the Julia demarcation between life and death. Addington-Hall, PhD, Hon Objective —To provide some insights into how a diagnosis of brain stem death or MFPH brain death may be perceived by family members approached about organ donation. University of Southampton, United Methods —A review of the literature regarding organ donation was carried out. Kingdom Results —Although most publications do not focus specifically on the concept of To purchase electronic or print reprints, brain death, those that do so made a valuable contribution, offering potential theo - contact: retical frameworks to aid our understanding of what the diagnosis of death by brain- The InnoVision Group based criteria means to family members of potential organ donors. The diagnosis 101 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 of brain death is intricately linked to the issue of organ donation and may influence Phone (800) 809-2273 (ext 532) or family members’ decision making. Also, the perception that death has occurred (949) 448-7370 (ext 532) differs from one person to another. Fax (949) 362-2049 Conclusions —A sustained increase in the number of organs available for trans - E-mail [email protected] plantation may never be achieved until the concepts of brain death, brain stem death, and now non –heart-beating death (1) are debated more widely within society; (2) a greater degree of consensus is reached within health care; and (3) bereaved family members approached to donate the organs of their deceased relative have a better understanding of what these diagnoses mean. ( Progress in Transplantation . 2008; 18:118-126) Notice to CE enrollees: members approached about organ donation is an A closed-book, multiple-choice examination after this important issue to explore as biomedicine moves to article tests your ability to accomplish the following objectives: expand the range of end-of-life technologies that, potentially, blur the demarcation between life and 1. Identify specific issues pertaining to the literature review death. This review of the organ donation literature on brain death aims to provide some insights into this issue. 2. Discuss the factors why families chose not to donate Researchers from many disciplines (anthropology, 3. Understand how brain death may be perceived by family members approached about organ donation psychology, sociology, nursing, and medicine), policy makers, government bodies, professional organiza - tions, charities, and patient groups have carried out or sponsored research seeking to answer the ever-present rain death, whether it be brain stem death (the question: Why, in the face of generally positive public term used in the United Kingdom) or whole- views regarding organ donation and transplantation, Bbrain death (the term used in the United States), is a are donation rates across the world falling short of prerequisite for heart-beating organ donation and is demand? Chronologically, we see research directed at therefore a fundamental factor in the process of organ different aspects of this question as far back as the and tissue donation for transplantation. Understanding 1970s and continuing up to the present day. Studies how brain death may be perceived by those family have focused on the public’s views of transplantation Progress in Transplantation, Vol 18, No. 2, June 2008 118 What brain death means to family members 1 and the donation of kidneys, public attitudes toward One of the few studies to make an assessment of 2-7 organ donation and transplantation, comparison of the extent of respondents’ knowledge about brain death, 30 donor families and the public regarding organ dona - by using scenarios, was carried out by Franz et al, work - 8 9 tion and its benefits, gifts of body parts, the experi - ing in the United States. Franz and colleagues carried ences of families who donated organs or declined out a cross-sectional telephone survey of 164 next-of- 10-23 organ donation for transplantation, decision mak - kin of potential organ donors. They report that a siz - 24-26 ing and organ donation, factors influencing the able number (no figures provided) of donor partici - 27-29 request for organ donation, and issues surrounding pants were confused about whether their relative was 30-34 death and organ procurement. truly dead, and furthermore, that nondo nating relatives Importantly, one issue that is a consistent, but minor, (n =62) had less understanding of brai n death than did theme within the organ donation research literature donating relatives (n = 102). 30 being referred to, but rarely given any detailed atten - Franz et al went on to ask participants a specific tion until recently, is public concerns regarding the question about brain death with the aim of assessing 10,30,35 diagnosis of death. Specifically the following their knowledge about the diagnosis of brain death. The issue have been identified: the concern that if people question was, If a person is diagnosed as brain dead, is agree to organ donation they may be diagnosed dead a person in a coma or dead? Responses indicated that 36 too soon, the concern that they or their relatives 95% of donor and 97% of nondonor respondents stat - 3,17 would not be dead at the time of organ donation, ed that their relative was brain dead, but that 28% of and the knowledge and understanding of family mem - donor and 45% of nondonor respondents stated that 13,18,21,25,32-34 bers and the public regarding brain death. their family member was in a coma. Nine percent of Most of these studies were not focused specifically on donors and 10% of nondonors stated that they did the concept of brain death, the exceptions being not know. 13 30 32-34 Pearson et al, Franz et al, Siminoff et al, and Respondents were then asked to state whether the 37 Dubois and Schmidt, but they make valuable contri - following statements were “true” or “not true”: (1) butions and offer potential theoretical frameworks to Someone who is brain dead is dead even though his or aid our understanding of what the diagnosis of death her heart is still beating, and (2) It is possible for a by brain-based criteria means to family members who brain-dead person to recover from his or her injuries. have been approached about organ donation. In response to statement (1), 12% of donor families Studies have tended to fall into 2 categories: (1) and 27% of nondonor families responded incorrectly surveys and qualitative studies exploring the level of and 8% and 15%, respectively, did not know. (True is public willingness to donate organs, and obstacles to the correct response.) When asked if they agreed with organ donation and (2) qualitative studies exploring statement (2), 20% of donor and 52% of nondonor the psychosocial factors that may underpin decision respondents incorrectly agreed with this statement, making in relation to organ donation. and 6% and 14%, respectively, did not know. These are important results because they indicate Family Membersʼ Knowledge and that the majority of the respondents in this study said Understanding of the Definition of that they understood brain death, but when questioned, Brain Death and Brain Stem Death “nearly half of donor and over 80% of all nondonor Studies carried out with donating and nondonat - respondents answered one or more questions about 30(p18) ing family members revealed a lack of information brain death incorrectly.” This result calls into ques - 13,25,30 regarding brain death, poor understanding of the tion whether family members who say they understand 29,30 meaning of brain death, dissatisfaction with the that their family member is dead really do understand 25 30 decision made at request, and confusion with other this diagnosis relative to medicolegal criteria. 33 brain conditions such as coma and the persistent veg - Siminoff et al asked a larger sample of family 30-34 etative state. members who had (n =232) or had not (n =171) donated 13 Pearson et al, working in Australia, surveyed 69 their family members’ organs about their experiences donating and nondonating family members about their in the hospital. Siminoff and colleagues assessed family experiences, their perceptions of the care their relative members’ knowledge in relation to brain death. Family received, and any explanations of the underlying diag - members of potential organ donors were interviewed nosis (critical illness), brain death, and organ donation face-to-face and asked about their experience in the that they received from health care professionals. hospital, the family members’ definition of brain death, Although most (80%) felt that brain death was well the meaning that families gave to the diagnosis of explained, only 52% were judged to have a good or brain death, their awareness of the testing procedure to satisfactory understanding of brain death, and 55% determine brain death, and their acceptance and under - would have liked to see diagrams and radiographs to standing of the brain death diagnosis. Accuracy of the 13 aid their understanding. definition of brain death offered by the participants Progress in Transplantation, Vol 18, No. 2, June 2008 119 Long et al was assessed by the research team, but they do not understanding of brain death, and participants’ per - offer the definition they used to make this assessment sonal definition of death.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Piercing the Veil: the Limits of Brain Death As a Legal Fiction
    University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 48 2015 Piercing the Veil: The Limits of Brain Death as a Legal Fiction Seema K. Shah Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr Part of the Health Law and Policy Commons, and the Medical Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Seema K. Shah, Piercing the Veil: The Limits of Brain Death as a Legal Fiction, 48 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 301 (2015). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol48/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PIERCING THE VEIL: THE LIMITS OF BRAIN DEATH AS A LEGAL FICTION Seema K. Shah* Brain death is different from the traditional, biological conception of death. Al- though there is no possibility of a meaningful recovery, considerable scientific evidence shows that neurological and other functions persist in patients accurately diagnosed as brain dead. Elsewhere with others, I have argued that brain death should be understood as an unacknowledged status legal fiction. A legal fiction arises when the law treats something as true, though it is known to be false or not known to be true, for a particular legal purpose (like the fiction that corporations are persons).
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Determining Death Based on Neurological Criteria
    GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING DEATH BASED ON NEUROLOGICAL CRITERIA New Jersey 2014 1 These guidelines have been drafted by the New Jersey Ad Hoc Committee on Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria, under the leadership of Dr. John Halperin, M.D. and William Reitsma, RN. We are grateful for the hard work and knowledgeable input of each of the following medical, legal and health care professionals. The authors gratefully acknowledge the work of the New York State Department of Health and the New York State Task Force on Life and the Law, and the guidelines for Brain Death Determination they promulgated in 2011. This document provides the foundation for these guidelines. John J. Halperin, M.D., FAAN, FACP Medical Director, Atlantic Neuroscience Institute Chair, Department of Neurosciences Overlook Medical Center Summit, NJ Alan Sori, M.D., FACS Director of Surgical Quality, Saint Joseph's Regional Medical Center Paterson, NJ Bruce J. Grossman, M.D. Director of Pediatric Transport Services Pediatric Intensivist K. Hovnanian Children’s Hospital at Jersey Shore University Medical Center Neptune, NJ Gregory J. Rokosz, D.O., J.D., FACEP Sr. Vice President for Medical and Academic Affairs/CMO Saint Barnabas Medical Center Livingston, NJ Christina Strong, Esq. Law Office of Christina W. Strong Belle Mead, NJ 2 GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING DEATH BASED ON NEUROLOGICAL CRITERIA BACKGROUND This document provides guidance for determining death by neurological criteria (commonly referred to as “brain death”), aims to increase knowledge amongst health care practitioners about the clinical evaluation of death determined by neurological criteria and reduce the potential for variation in brain death determination policies and practices amongst facilities and practitioners within the State of New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Death and the Philosophical Significance of the Process Of
    The Linacre Quarterly Volume 68 | Number 1 Article 3 February 2001 Brain Death and the Philosophical Significance of the Process of Development of, and Cessation of, Consciousness in Arousal and Awareness in the Human Person Theodore Gillian Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq Recommended Citation Gillian, Theodore (2001) "Brain Death and the Philosophical Significance of the Process of Development of, and Cessation of, Consciousness in Arousal and Awareness in the Human Person," The Linacre Quarterly: Vol. 68: No. 1, Article 3. Available at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq/vol68/iss1/3 Brain Death and the Philosophical Significance of the Process of Development of, and Cessation of, Consciousness in Arousal and Awareness in the Human Person. by Theodore Gillian, OFM The author is a priest ofthe Order ofFriars Minor in the Province of the Holy Spirit, residing in Sydney, Australia. Before entering the priesthood, he was a pharmacist I am arguing that the human person, as the human identity from conception to death, links death with the beginnings of life and vice versa. This challenges us to identify the human person as one in a unitary development, physical and spiritual, that is sundered only at death. In approaching the matter from this angle I bring into focus the problem of identifying what happens at death and the problem of identifying what happens at the " beginning of personal life. This requires seeing through our psychological states to discover the necessary substratum that actually is the human person. At the outset, death is taken as the demarcation between the "process of dying and disintegration" (1 Garcia, 37).
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Death Panel Slides
    SUPPORTING THE BRAIN DEATH DECLARATION THE ROLE OF PALLIATIVE CARE May Ronci, RN, CHPN Lori Carlton-Mowry, MSW, ACSW Frequently What is brain death? Asked Questions Brain death occurs when a person has an irreversible, catastrophic brain injury, which causes total cessation of all What Tests can be used to brain function (the upper brain structure and brain stem). evaluate brain death? Brain death is not a coma or persistent vegetative state. Brain death is determined in the hospital by two physicians. • Apnea Test: The apnea test looks for a patient’s effort to breathe on their own. If • Some causes of brain death include, but are not limited to: someone cannot breath on • Trauma to the brain (i.e. severe head injury caused by a motor vehicle crash, gunshot wound, fall or blow to the head) their own, this is considered a very strong • Cerebrovascular injury (i.e. stroke or aneurysm) confirmatory test for brain • Anoxia (i.e. drowning or heart attack when the patient is revived, but not before a lack of blood flow/oxygen to the brain death. has caused brain death) • Brain tumor • Electroencephalogram (EEG): An EEG measures If my loved one is brain dead, what does that mean? electrical activity in the When someone is brain dead, it means that the brain is no brain. An EEG can help longer working in any capacity and never will again. When caregivers evaluate the brain death is declared, it means your loved one has died. presence of electrical activity of the brain and the Your loved may not appear dead because the chest will type of electrical activity continue to rise and fall with the ventilator providing breaths, that is occurring.
    [Show full text]
  • Locked-In' Syndrome, the Persistent Vegetative State and Brain Death
    Spinal Cord (1998) 36, 741 ± 743 ã 1998 International Medical Society of Paraplegia All rights reserved 1362 ± 4393/98 $12.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/sc Moral Dilemmas Moral dilemmas of tetraplegia; the `locked-in' syndrome, the persistent vegetative state and brain death R Firsching Director and Professor, Klinik fuÈr Neurochirurgie, UniversitaÈtsklinikum, Leipziger Str. 44; 39120 Magdeburg, Germany Keywords: tetraplegia; `locked-in' syndrome; persistent vegetative state; brain death Lesions of the upper part of the spinal cord, the persistent vegetative state (PVS) stand on less safe medulla oblongata or the brain stem have dierent grounds and greater national dierences may be neurological sequelae depending on their exact location discerned: The causes may be variable, ranging from and extent. trauma to hemorrhage, hypoxia and infection. The High tetraplegia with a lesion at the level of the C3 pathomorphology is a matter of debate.5 Findings segment will leave the patient helpless but fully from the most famous PVS patient, KA Quinlan, conscious of his situation, and communication is revealed severe destruction of the thalamus,6 also usually possible. destruction of white matter and extensive destruction The patient who is `locked in' suers from a lesion of the cerebral cortex has been reported. The level of of the pyramidal tract, mostly at the upper pontine ± consciousness in these patients cannot be clari®ed, as cerebral peduncle ± level.1 Communication is reduced they are unresponsive. They are certainly not to vertical eye movements and blinking. comatose, as they open their eyes, and the kind of The persistent vegetative state is a quite hetero- pain perception that these patients have is similarly genous entity, and the underlying lesions are variable.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Deal with Brain Death: Legal and Ethical Considerations] [Jessica Robinson] James Madison University Lexia Ÿ Volume V Ÿ 2
    Lexia: Undergraduate Journal in Writing, Rhetoric & Technical Communication Volume V 2016–2017 [How to Deal with Brain Death: Legal and Ethical Considerations] [Jessica Robinson] James Madison University Lexia Volume V 2 Approximately 3,000 people are diagnosed as brain dead every year. This leads to about 3,000 families fighting to continue treatment, and 3,000 doctors trying to inform those families that their loved ones are gone and cannot come back to life. Brain death can be difficult to deal with because of the varying legal and ethical considerations that must be considered when diagnosing someone as brain dead. There is no distinction between what patients can and can’t do, which makes it difficult for doctors to accurately do their job. Through researching the definition of death, the rights of a patient, and the ethical responsibilities of the doctor and the patient, I noticed a gap between the ethical responsibilities of the doctor and the impact the law has on how the doctor does their job. Following a tonsillectomy in 2013, an eighth-grade girl, Jahi McMath, suffered rare complications which led to severe neurological damage. McMath was pronounced brain dead and doctors recommended the removal of ventilation. McMath’s parents, however, did not believe their daughter was dead; she was breathing, her heart was beating, and her skin was warm and moist. They refused to let the doctors remove McMath from ventilation because they believed their daughter still had a chance at regaining consciousness. The doctors could not refuse her parents’ wishes despite the fact that they knew that McMath would not regain consciousness, and unnecessarily keeping her alive would be wasting scarce hospital resources and the family’s money on a dead body.
    [Show full text]
  • A Jewish Law Perspective Stephen J
    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Journal of Law and Health Law Journals 1996 Ancient Answers to Modern Questions: Death, Dying, and Organ Transplants - A Jewish Law Perspective Stephen J. Werber Cleveland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/jlh Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Religion Law Commons How does access to this work benefit oy u? Let us know! Recommended Citation Stephen J. Werber, Ancient Answers to Modern Questions: Death, Dying, and Organ Transplants - A Jewish Law Perspective, 11 J.L. & Health 13 (1996-1997) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Law and Health by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANCIENT ANSWERS TO MODERN QUESTIONS: DEATH, DYING, AND ORGAN TRANSPLANTS - A JEWISH LAW PERSPECTIVE 1 STEPHEN J.WERBER I. INTRODUCTION ..................................... 13 II. DEFINING DEATH ................................... 18 II1. ORGAN TRANSPLANTS ................................ 23 IV. "CHOOSE LIFE"-MEDICAL DIRECTIVES, EUTHANASIA, SUICIDE ...27 A . Suicide ....................................... 28 B. The DNR Conundrum .......................... 31 C. Euthanasia .................................... 34 D. Assisted Suicide ................................ 42 V . CONCLUSION ...................................... 44 I. INTRODUCTION Medical advances
    [Show full text]
  • Buddhism and Death: the Brain-Centered Criteria
    Journal of Buddhist Ethics ISSN 1076-9005 http://jbe.gold.ac.uk/ Buddhism and Death: The Brain-Centered Criteria John-Anderson L. Meyer University of Hawai‘i Email: [email protected] Copyright Notice: Digital copies of this work may be made and distributed provided no change is made and no alteration is made to the content. Reproduction in any other format, with the exception of a single copy for private study, requires the written permission of the author. All enquiries to: [email protected] Buddhism and Death: The Brain-Centered Criteria John-Anderson L. Meyer Abstract This essay explores the two main definitions of human death that have gained popularity in the western medical con- text in recent years, and attempts to determine which of these criteria — “whole-brain” or “cerebral” — is best in accord with a Buddhist understanding of death. In the end, the position is taken that there is textual and linguistic evidence in place for both the “cerebral” and “whole-brain” definitions of death. Be- cause the textual sources underdetermine the definitive Buddhist conception of death, it is left to careful reasoning by way of logic, intuition, and inference to determine which definition of death is best representative of Buddhism. Buddhism, generally considered, is a belief system that holds as its ultimate aim the elimination of suffering through the cessation of the endless cycle of death and rebirth. The attainment of nirvana, defined by some as “the absolute extinction of the life-affirming will manifested as . convul- sively clinging to existence; and therewith also the ultimate and absolute deliverance from all future rebirth, old age, disease and death,”1 is the goal of Buddhism and the outcome of the definitive elimination of all suffering.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Relating to Euthanasia in India: a Critical Study
    EUTH ANASIA LAW LAW RELATING TO EUTHANASIA IN INDIA: A CRITICAL STUDY DebabrataBasu Assistant Professor, West Bengal Education Service (W.B.E.S), Hooghly Mohsin College, West Bengal. Abstract Euthanasia and its procedure entail complicated issues regarding legal and procedural compliance in countries across the world. Every person has a right to determine what should be done with his/her person. It is unlawful to administer treatment on an adult who is conscious and of sound mind, without his consent. Patients with Permanent Vegetative State (PVS) and no hope of improvement cannot make decisions about treatment to be given to them. It is ultimately for the Court to decide, as to what is in the best interest of the patient. Every human being desires to live and enjoy the life till he dies. But sometimes a human being wishes to end his life in the manner he chooses. To end one’s life in an unnatural way is a sign of abnormality. When a person ends his life by his own act we call it “suicide” but to end a person’s life by others on the request of the deceased, is called “euthanasia” or “mercy killing”. Keywords: Euthanasia; legal rights; active euthanasia, passive euthanasia. Euthanasia is mainly associated with people with terminal illness or who have become incapacitated and don’t want to go through the rest of their life suffering. A severely handicapped or terminally ill person supposed to have the right to choose between life and death. This right of a patient with terminal illness cannot be equated with an able bodied, sane person’s right.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Wish R
    JK SCIENCE MEDICO LEGAL NOTES Death Wish R. K. Bansal, S. Das, P. Dayal Introduction b) Passive euthanasia: when artificial life-sustaining Euthanasia is a hot topic and is going to get hotter. aids are withdrawn to precipitate death. The word euthanasia comes from the Greek ‘Eu’ meaning c) Voluntary euthanasia: When euthanasia is practiced good and ‘thanatos’ meaning death. It means good death- with the expressed desire and consent of the patient. a mercy killing of a person by another to end his suffering. d) Involuntary euthanasia: When euthanasia is practiced While countries like the Netherlands, Belgium, parts of without the consent of the patient. In this case , either Australia and the American state of Oregon etc., have the consent of the patient is not obtainable or valid or he legalized euthanasia, it continues to be illegal in most of is not apprised of the decision of his relatives. the world. It is high time that euthanasia should be In India like most other countries of the world, legalized in our country too, with provisions of pertinent euthanasia has no legal status. As the law stands, the safeguards to prevent any possible abuse by medical practice of euthanasia is a clear act of criminal offence. professionals in particular and the society in general. If it is done with the consent of the patient-the doctor Article 21 of the constitution guarantees ‘Right to Life’ may be booked under S. 306 IPC for abetment of suicide. which is a natural and fundamental right. Does that mean The punishment for which is upto 10 years of everybody has the duty to live until they die a natural imprisonment and fine.
    [Show full text]
  • THE VEGETATIVE STATE and MOVEMENTS in BRAIN DEATH*
    The Signs of Death Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Scripta Varia 110, Vatican City 2007 www.pas.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/sv110/sv110-estol.pdf WHAT IS NOT BRAIN DEATH: THE VEGETATIVE STATE and MOVEMENTS IN BRAIN DEATH* CONRADO J. ESTOL The main objective of this meeting convened at the Pontifical Academy of Sciences is to discuss the topic of Brain Death. Although in general there is no debate within the scientific community, the concept of Brain Death has been questioned by lay people and in some cases by physicians. For this reason it seemed appropriate to begin this two-day conference discussing ‘What is not Brain Death’, referring to the loss of consciousness that occurs in coma and in the vegetative state, two neurological scenarios that in dif- ferent medical and non medical circles are not infrequently confused or used interchangeably with brain death. It is important to remind ourselves that the objectives defined for this Working Group on the Signs of Death at the request of Chancellor Bishop Monsignor Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences following the instructions of the Holy Father Benedict XVI, is to ‘study the signs of death in order to explore at a purely scientific level the application of the criterion of brain death’. Following this request, I am pre- senting two scientific subjects and will avoid most philosophical aspects of the discussion. The first presentation is entitled ‘What is not Brain Death: The Vegetative State’ and the second is ‘Movements in Brain Death’. WHAT IS NOT BRAIN DEATH: THE VEGETATIVE STATE Consciousness To discuss ‘consciousness’, we should go back as far as 1890 when William James described it as ‘awareness of the self and the environment’.
    [Show full text]
  • BRAIN DEATH 1) Unresponsiveness 2) Cerebrally Modulated Motor Responses Are Criteria Absent
    Exam BRAIN DEATH 1) Unresponsiveness 2) Cerebrally modulated motor responses are Criteria absent. 1) Cause of coma must be a a. Spinal cord reflexes (triple flexion) may be permanent condition present. 2) Exclusions: Drugs, electrolyte b. Seizures or decorticate/decerebrate posturing rule out brain death. abnormalities, Acidosis, Hypothermia, Endocrine (Myxedema coma), 3) Absence of the following brainstem reflexes: Liver/renal failure a. Pupilary 3) Absence of medications: toxicology, b. Corneal wait 4-7 times ½ life of medications, c. Cough to deep endotracheal suctioning TOF testing d. Oculovestibular (Caloric Ice Water Test) 4) Temperature > 36o i. Ensure TMs intact 5) SBP > 100 ii. 50 ml ice cold water, allow 1 minute after 6) Brain stem reflexes exam injection and at least 5 minutes between testing on 7) Apnea testing each side. 8) Ancillary testing if unable to perform e. Respiratory reflex (see apnea testing below) all the above. Apnea testing 1. Prior to apnea testing the patient must meet the prerequisites and exam criteria for brain death. a. systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 100 mmHg. b. FIO2 100% for at least 10 minutes prior to Apnea Test c. The ventilator settings should be adjusted for a PaCO2 of 35- 40mmHG d. Obtain baseline ABG. 2. The Apnea Test begins when mechanical ventilation is removed. Oxygen at 100% should be delivered via t-piece. a. Monitor blood pressure and heart rate continuously. If the patient becomes unstable during the period, terminate the test. Alternative confirmatory test must be utilized. b. Observe and/or feel for any respiratory effort. If respiratory effort is noted, stop the test and resume mechanical ventilation.
    [Show full text]