DOCSLIB.ORG

How Parasoft and Experitest Enable End-To-End Continuous Testing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How Parasoft and Experitest Enable End-To-End Continuous Testing How Parasoft and Experitest enable end- to-end continuous testing Guy Arieli, CTO, Experitest Mark Lambert, VP of Products, Parasoft Today’s Speakers Guy Arieli Mark Lambert CTO, Experitest VP of Products, Parasoft Experitest Snapshot Leading continuous testing platform provider for web & mobile apps, available as a SaaS or on-premise deployment 5 global Open source 1000+ datacenters support: customers • US, CA • Appium • UK All verticles: • Germany • Espresso banking, telecom, • Israel • XCTest insurance etc. • Australia • Selenium • 2 more planned Functional DevOps Available as Performance users: SaaS or Visual testing developers on-premise and testers deployment 5 SeeTest Continuous Testing platform for web and mobile apps Integrations: Mobile Desktop devices browsers Deployment models: Digital • SaaS Lab • On-premise Emulators & simulators 6 About Parasoft Pushing the bounds of what we can automate in software testing for the development lifecycle Jtest, C/C++test, dotTEST Developer SOAtest Tester Virtualize Load Test Parasoft DTP Manager Testing in a rapidly changing digital environment Mobile First Increased Test Team Collaboration Strategy Complexity Increasing complexity of test requirements Application Under Test Web Automated Testing with Parasoft SOAtest Parasoft SOAtest Application Under Test Web SOAtest SOAtest Omni/Multi-Channel Testing with Parasoft SOAtest Unavailable or fee-based 3rd Parasoft party systems SOAtest Application Under Test Uncontrollable behavior Web “Agile Roadblock” SOAtest Unable to ‘shift- left’ performance SOAtest testing Total control of the Test Environment Parasoft Parasoft Virtualize SOAtest Application 500 Internal Under Test Server Error Malformed Response Web Expose a security Exception SOAtest Test the SOAtest boundaries of performance Test Data SLAs Environment based approach to testing Dynamic test environments Deploy to Functional Performance Penetration Deploy to CheckCheck--inin Build Unit Test Stage Test Test Test Production Combining Tests, Virtualize Assets and Data into disposable test environments to enabled complete test coverage The key to ensuring Quality @ Speed Continuous execution of ‘all’ tests during each stage of the development lifecycle Immediate and ongoing feedback Blueprint for a solid automated testing strategy Building a scalable test automation strategy Focus end-to-end UI testing on filling in the gaps in functional coverage and validating critical use-cases Establish broad coverage of easier to diagnose, and automate, API and Unit Tests Easier to scale, Easier to automate Building a solid Testing Pyramid Minimize reliance on, and focus application, of end-to-end UI tests Expand API test coverage driven “by design” and “by use Establish a solid foundation of early Jtest stage JUnit Tests Static Code Analysis Building a solid Testing Pyramid Minimize reliance on, and focus application, of end-to-end UI tests SOAtest Expand API test Load Test coverage driven Re-use API tests and reduce “by design” and the business risk with early “by use stage Load/Performance Testing Establish a solid foundation of early stage JUnit Tests Static Code Analysis Building a solid Testing Pyramid Minimize reliance on, and focus application, of end-to-end UI tests Virtualize SOAtest ‘Shift-left’ tests with Service Virtualization Expand API test and increase feedback coverage driven earlier in the “by design” and development process “by use Establish a solid foundation of early stage Unit Tests Static Code Analysis Building a solid Testing Pyramid Minimize reliance on, and focus application, of end-to-end UI tests Virtualize SOAtest ‘Shift-left’ tests with Service Virtualization Expand API test and increase feedback coverage driven earlier in the “by design” and development process “by use Establish a solid foundation of early Jtest stage Unit Tests Enables a scalable test automationStatic strategyCode Analysis So how do we do that? Demonstration Building tests for both “API design” and “API use” Building tests for cross platform mobile UI Combining everything together into an omni-channel test Getting insight with aggerated reporting Making End-to-End Continuous Testing a Reality Customer Experience is the key driver to ensure business success Customer Experiences crosses both human and non-human interfaces Experitest + Parasoft provide critical components for the optimized DevOps tool chain Parasoft SOAtest .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Core Elements of Continuous Testing
    WHITE PAPER CORE ELEMENTS OF CONTINUOUS TESTING Today’s modern development disciplines -- whether Agile, Continuous Integration (CI) or Continuous Delivery (CD) -- have completely transformed how teams develop and deliver applications. Companies that need to compete in today’s fast-paced digital economy must also transform how they test. Successful teams know the secret sauce to delivering high quality digital experiences fast is continuous testing. This paper will define continuous testing, explain what it is, why it’s important, and the core elements and tactical changes development and QA teams need to make in order to succeed at this emerging practice. TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 What is Continuous Testing? 6 Tactical Engineering Considerations 3 Why Continuous Testing? 7 Benefits of Continuous Testing 4 Core Elements of Continuous Testing WHAT IS CONTINUOUS TESTING? Continuous testing is the practice of executing automated tests throughout the software development cycle. It’s more than just automated testing; it’s applying the right level of automation at each stage in the development process. Unlike legacy testing methods that occur at the end of the development cycle, continuous testing occurs at multiple stages, including development, integration, pre-release, and in production. Continuous testing ensures that bugs are caught and fixed far earlier in the development process, improving overall quality while saving significant time and money. WHY CONTINUOUS TESTING? Continuous testing is a critical requirement for organizations that are shifting left towards CI or CD, both modern development practices that ensure faster time to market. When automated testing is coupled with a CI server, tests can instantly be kicked off with every build, and alerts with passing or failing test results can be delivered directly to the development team in real time.
    [Show full text]
  • Webnet 2000 World Conference on the WWW and Internet Proceedings (San Antonio, Texas, October 30-November 4Th, 2000)
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 448 744 IR 020 507 AUTHOR Davies, Gordon, Ed.; Owen, Charles, Ed. TITLE WebNet 2000 World Conference on the WWW and Internet Proceedings (San Antonio, Texas, October 30-November 4th, 2000) . INSTITUTION Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, VA. ISBN ISBN-1-880094-40-1 PUB DATE 2000-11-00 NOTE 1005p.; For individual papers, see IR 020 508-527. For the 1999 conference, see IR 020 454. AVAILABLE FROM Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), P.O. Box 3728, Norfolk, VA 23514-3728; Web site: http://www.aace.org. PUB TYPE Collected Works Proceedings (021) EDRS PRICE MF07/PC41 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Computer Uses in Education; Courseware; Distance Education; *Educational Technology; Electronic Libraries; Electronic Publishing; *Information Technology; Internet; Multimedia Instruction; Multimedia Materials; Postsecondary Education; *World Wide Web IDENTIFIERS Electronic Commerce; Technology Utilization; *Web Based Instruction ABSTRACT The 2000 WebNet conference addressed research, new developments, and experiences related to the Internet and World Wide Web. The 319 contributions of WebNet 2000 contained in this proceedings comprise the full and short papers accepted for presentation at the conference, as well as poster/demonstration abstracts. Major topics covered include: commercial, business, professional, and community applications; education applications; electronic publishing and digital libraries; ergonomic, interface, and cognitive issues; general Web tools and facilities; medical applications of the Web; \personal applications and environments;, societal issues, including legal, standards, and international issues; and Web technical facilities. (MES) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. Web Net 2 World Conference Alb U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Web Services: a Survey Technical Report TR-10-01
    Testing Web Services: A Survey Technical report TR-10-01 Mustafa Bozkurt, Mark Harman and Youssef Hassoun Centre for Research on Evolution, Search & Testing King’s College London Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK mustafa.bozkurt,mark.harman,youssef.hassoun @kcl.ac.uk f g Abstract The Service-Oriented Computing (SOC) paradigm is allowing computer systems to interact with each other in new ways. According to the literature, SOC allows composition of distributed applications free from their platform and thus reduces the cost of such compositions and makes them easier and faster to develop. Currently web services are the most widely accepted service technology due to the level of autonomy and platform-independency they provide. However, web services also bring challenges. For example, testing web services at the client side is not as straightforward as testing traditional software due to the complex nature of web services and the absence of source code. This paper surveys the previous work undertaken on web service testing, showing the strengths and weaknesses of current web service testing strategies and identifying issues for future work. 1 Introduction This paper presents a survey of web service testing techniques. Web services is a rapidly growing concept that drives the Service-Oriented Computing (SOC) at present. Web services present important challenges to software testers. These challanges has led to much work on techniques for testing web services. The present paper seeks to provide a comprehensive survey of existing work. According to Papazoglou [110], SOC is a new computing paradigm that utilizes services as the lightweight constructs to support the development of rapid, low-cost and easy composition of distributed applications.
    [Show full text]
  • ® Voke Research
    voke Research MARKET MOVER ARRAY™ REPORT: Service Virtualization By Theresa Lanowitz, Lisa Dronzek | September 26, 2018 Vendor Excerpt The completeclients publication at www.vokeinc.com is available to voke. Research ® Moving markets beyond the status quo! voke Research MARKET MOVER ARRAY™ REPORT: Service Virtualization By Theresa Lanowitz, Lisa Dronzek | September 26, 2018 ~ SUMMARY ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS Service virtualization is a powerful, Executive Overview 2 proven, and collaborative technology • Business Context 2 that enables software engineering • Technology Overview 2 teams to more accurately model • Market Status 3 the real-life behavior of software Market Mover Array Methodology 4 prior to production. By removing Market Mover Array Chart 6 the constraints and wait time for Market Mover Array Vendors 6 assets to be complete and available, • CA Technologies 9 service virtualization solutions deliver • IBM 11 on the promise of better business • Micro Focus 13 outcomes. Your teams can work • Parasoft 15 faster, release more • SmartBear 17 reliable software, • Tricentis 19 and delight the Related Research 21 business. • Market Specific 21 • Vendor Specific 21 • Book 21 © 2018 voke media, llc. All rights reserved. voke is a trademark of voke media, llc. and is registered in the U.S. All other trademarks are the property of their respective companies. Reproduction or distribution of this document except as expressly provided in writing by voke is strictly prohibited. Opinions reflect judgment at the time and are subject to change without notice. voke disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in the information contained or for interpretations thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework and Tool Supports for Generating Test Inputs of Aspectj Programs
    A Framework and Tool Supports for Generating Test Inputs of AspectJ Programs Tao Xie Jianjun Zhao Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science & Engineering North Carolina State University Shanghai Jiao Tong University Raleigh, NC 27695 Shanghai 200240, China [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION Aspect-oriented software development is gaining popularity with Aspect-oriented software development (AOSD) is a new tech- the wider adoption of languages such as AspectJ. To reduce the nique that improves separation of concerns in software develop- manual effort of testing aspects in AspectJ programs, we have de- ment [9, 18, 22, 30]. AOSD makes it possible to modularize cross- veloped a framework, called Aspectra, that automates generation of cutting concerns of a software system, thus making it easier to test inputs for testing aspectual behavior, i.e., the behavior imple- maintain and evolve. Research in AOSD has focused mostly on mented in pieces of advice or intertype methods defined in aspects. the activities of software system design, problem analysis, and lan- To test aspects, developers construct base classes into which the guage implementation. Although it is well known that testing is a aspects are woven to form woven classes. Our approach leverages labor-intensive process that can account for half the total cost of existing test-generation tools to generate test inputs for the woven software development [8], research on testing of AOSD, especially classes; these test inputs indirectly exercise the aspects. To enable automated testing, has received little attention. aspects to be exercised during test generation, Aspectra automati- Although several approaches have been proposed recently for cally synthesizes appropriate wrapper classes for woven classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasoft Dottest REDUCE the RISK of .NET DEVELOPMENT
    Parasoft dotTEST REDUCE THE RISK OF .NET DEVELOPMENT TRY IT https://software.parasoft.com/dottest Complement your existing Visual Studio tools with deep static INCREASE analysis and advanced PROGRAMMING EFFICIENCY: coverage. An automated, non-invasive solution that the related code, and distributed to his or her scans the application codebase to iden- IDE with direct links to the problematic code • Identify runtime bugs without tify issues before they become produc- and a description of how to fix it. executing your software tion problems, Parasoft dotTEST inte- grates into the Parasoft portfolio, helping When you send the results of dotTEST’s stat- • Automate unit and component you achieve compliance in safety-critical ic analysis, coverage, and test traceability testing for instant verification and industries. into Parasoft’s reporting and analytics plat- regression testing form (DTP), they integrate with results from Parasoft dotTEST automates a broad Parasoft Jtest and Parasoft C/C++test, allow- • Automate code analysis for range of software quality practices, in- ing you to test your entire codebase and mit- compliance cluding static code analysis, unit testing, igate risks. code review, and coverage analysis, en- abling organizations to reduce risks and boost efficiency. Tests can be run directly from Visual Stu- dio or as part of an automated process. To promote rapid remediation, each problem detected is prioritized based on configur- able severity assignments, automatical- ly assigned to the developer who wrote It snaps right into Visual Studio as though it were part of the product and it greatly reduces errors by enforcing all your favorite rules. We have stuck to the MS Guidelines and we had to do almost no work at all to have dotTEST automate our code analysis and generate the grunt work part of the unit tests so that we could focus our attention on real test-driven development.
    [Show full text]
  • Drive Continuous Delivery with Continuous Testing
    I Don’t Believe Your Company Is Agile! Alex Martins CTO Continuous Testing CA Technologies October 2017 1 Why Many Companies Think They’re Agile… They moved some Dev projects from waterfall to agile They’re having daily standups They have a scrum master Product owner is part of the team They are all talking and walking agile… And are talking about Continuous Delivery BUT… QA is STILL a Bottleneck… Even in DevOps Shops A 2017 survey of self- …of delays were occurring at proclaimed DevOps 63% the Test/QA stage of the practitioners found that … cycle. “Where are the main hold-ups in the software production process?” 63% 32% 30% 16% 22% 21% 23% http://www.computing.co.uk/digital_assets/634fe325-aa28-41d5-8676-855b06567fe2/CTG-DevOps-Review-2017.pdf 3 Challenges to Achieving Continuous Delivery & Testing IDEA Requirements 64% of total defect cost originate in the requirements analysis and design phase1. ? ? of developers time is spent 80% of teams experience delays in development and QA Development 50% 3 finding and fixing defects2 due to unavailable dependencies X X Security 70x required manual pen 30% of teams only security scan 50% more time spent on security test scan cost vs. automation10 once per year9 defects in lower-performing teams8 X X X 70% of all 63% of testers admit they 50% of time 79% of teams face prohibitive QA / Testing testing is still can’t test across all the different spent looking for restrictions, time limits or access manual4 devices and OS versions5 test data6 fees on needed 3rd party services3 ! Release 57% are dissatisfied with the time it takes to deploy new features7 ! ! Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Continuous Testing with Spirent's Automation Platforms
    STREAMLINE Your Continuous Testing With Spirent’s Automation Platforms DE RELE VE AS LO E P E T A ING T R G ES E T T S N U I O U IN T N E CO STAG Table of Contents Agile 3 What is Continuous Test (CT)? 4 What Hinders CT Implementation? 5 The Chasm 6 The Bridge 7 Spirent Velocity Framework 8 Lab as a Service (LaaS) 9 Test as a Service (TaaS) 10 CT Implementation Best Practices 11 Summary 12 2 of 12 Agile software development practices gained momentum in the late 90s. Agile emphasizes close collaboration between business stakeholders, the development team, and QA. This enabled faster software delivery, better quality and improved customer satisfaction. By employing DevOps practices, the pace and benefits are amplified. 3 of 12 What is Continuous Test (CT)? Continuous Test (CT) enables CT haed Cotuous terato ad Deery ee network testing to be more effectively performed by DEVELOP ITEATE STAGE ELEASE development teams by enabling them to take advantage of the QA team’s knowledge of real world customer use cases and environments. This is known as “shift left” because testing is moved earlier in the development cycle. With “shift left” tests are run as early as possible to accelerate understanding of AUTOMATE TESTS ORCHESTRATE TEST ENVIRONMENTSEXECUTE TESTS EARLIER problem areas in the code and where development attention is required. Why Do You Need CT? The combination of earlier and faster testing shortens time to release while improving quality and customer satisfaction. 4 of 12 What Hinders CT Implementation? Deficient or non existent Insufficient test Lack of test results Inadequate understanding of tools for creating resources for timely analysis tools hinder customer environments and automated tests test execution assessment of test results use cases by developers EW SOFTWAE DEVELOP ITEATE STAGE ELEASE SOFTWAE BILD ELEASE The promise of DevOps can’t be fully realized until Continuous Testing (CT) is factored in.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasoft Static Application Security Testing (SAST) for .Net - C/C++ - Java Platform
    Parasoft Static Application Security Testing (SAST) for .Net - C/C++ - Java Platform Parasoft® dotTEST™ /Jtest (for Java) / C/C++test is an integrated Development Testing solution for automating a broad range of testing best practices proven to improve development team productivity and software quality. dotTEST / Java Test / C/C++ Test also seamlessly integrates with Parasoft SOAtest as an option, which enables end-to-end functional and load testing for complex distributed applications and transactions. Capabilities Overview STATIC ANALYSIS ● Broad support for languages and standards: Security | C/C++ | Java | .NET | FDA | Safety-critical ● Static analysis tool industry leader since 1994 ● Simple out-of-the-box integration into your SDLC ● Prevent and expose defects via multiple analysis techniques ● Find and fix issues rapidly, with minimal disruption ● Integrated with Parasoft's suite of development testing capabilities, including unit testing, code coverage analysis, and code review CODE COVERAGE ANALYSIS ● Track coverage during unit test execution and the data merge with coverage captured during functional and manual testing in Parasoft Development Testing Platform to measure true test coverage. ● Integrate with coverage data with static analysis violations, unit testing results, and other testing practices in Parasoft Development Testing Platform for a complete view of the risk associated with your application ● Achieve test traceability to understand the impact of change, focus testing activities based on risk, and meet compliance
    [Show full text]
  • Email: [email protected] Website
    Email: [email protected] Website: http://chrismatech.com Experienced software and systems engineer who has successfully deployed custom & industry-standard embedded, desktop and networked systems for commercial and DoD customers. Delivered systems operate on airborne, terrestrial, maritime, and space based vehicles and platforms. Expert in performing all phases of the software and system development life-cycle including: Creating requirements and design specifications. Model-driven software development, code implementation, and unit test. System integration. Requirements-based system verification with structural coverage at the system and module levels. Formal qualification/certification test. Final product packaging, delivery, and site installation. Post-delivery maintenance and customer support. Requirements management and end-to-end traceability. Configuration management. Review & control of change requests and defect reports. Quality assurance. Peer reviews/Fagan inspections, TIMs, PDRs and CDRs. Management and project planning proficiencies include: Supervising, coordinating, and mentoring engineering staff members. Creating project Software Development Plans (SDPs). Establishing system architectures, baseline designs, and technical direction. Creating & tracking project task and resource scheduling, costs, resource utilization, and metrics (e.g., Earned Value Analysis). Preparing proposals in response to RFPs and SOWs. Project Management • Microsoft Project, Excel, Word, PowerPoint, Visio & Documentation: • Adobe Acrobat Professional
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Verification and Validation Techniques for Small Satellite Software Development
    Survey of Verification and Validation Techniques for Small Satellite Software Development Stephen A. Jacklin NASA Ames Research Center Presented at the 2015 Space Tech Expo Conference May 19-21, Long Beach, CA Summary The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the current trends and practices in small-satellite software verification and validation. This document is not intended to promote a specific software assurance method. Rather, it seeks to present an unbiased survey of software assurance methods used to verify and validate small satellite software and to make mention of the benefits and value of each approach. These methods include simulation and testing, verification and validation with model-based design, formal methods, and fault-tolerant software design with run-time monitoring. Although the literature reveals that simulation and testing has by far the longest legacy, model-based design methods are proving to be useful for software verification and validation. Some work in formal methods, though not widely used for any satellites, may offer new ways to improve small satellite software verification and validation. These methods need to be further advanced to deal with the state explosion problem and to make them more usable by small-satellite software engineers to be regularly applied to software verification. Last, it is explained how run-time monitoring, combined with fault-tolerant software design methods, provides an important means to detect and correct software errors that escape the verification process or those errors that are produced after launch through the effects of ionizing radiation. Introduction While the space industry has developed very good methods for verifying and validating software for large communication satellites over the last 50 years, such methods are also very expensive and require large development budgets.
    [Show full text]
  • An Eclipse Plug-In for Testing and Debugging
    GZoltar: An Eclipse Plug-In for Testing and Debugging José Campos André Riboira Alexandre Perez Rui Abreu Department of Informatics Engineering Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto Portugal {jose.carlos.campos, andre.riboira, alexandre.perez}@fe.up.pt; [email protected] ABSTRACT coverage). Several debugging tools exist which are based on Testing and debugging is the most expensive, error-prone stepping through the execution of the program (e.g., GDB phase in the software development life cycle. Automated and DDD). These traditional, manual fault localization ap- testing and diagnosis of software faults can drastically proaches have a number of important limitations. The place- improve the efficiency of this phase, this way improving ment of print statements as well as the inspection of their the overall quality of the software. In this paper we output are unstructured and ad-hoc, and are typically based present a toolset for automatic testing and fault localiza- on the developer's intuition. In addition, developers tend to use only test cases that reveal the failure, and therefore do tion, dubbed GZoltar, which hosts techniques for (regres- sion) test suite minimization and automatic fault diagno- not use valuable information from (the typically available) sis (namely, spectrum-based fault localization). The toolset passing test cases. provides the infrastructure to automatically instrument the Aimed at drastic cost reduction, much research has been source code of software programs to produce runtime data. performed in developing automatic testing and fault local- Subsequently the data was analyzed to both minimize the ization techniques and tools. As far as testing is concerned, test suite and return a ranked list of diagnosis candidates.
    [Show full text]