112 MONTHLY WEATHER kEVIEW hRCH, l!&

ENERGY DISTRIBUTION IN THE OF SUNLIQHT AND SKYLIQHT By HERBERTH. KIMBALL

(11. 8. Weather Bureau. \T ‘nshington, March 24, 1WI

In the MONTHLYWEATHER REVIEW for October, 1924, curves by plottin against solar altitudes the I‘ Total” 52:476, Table 2 gives the relative intensitp of , energy for the diB erent wave lengths, as given in section skyli ht, and the two combined, for different wave (a) of Table 2,‘ with the at different zenith distances, lengt% s in the visible spectrum. The data for sunlight or altitudes. This gave four points of the intensity curve were derived from Abbot’s normal solar energy curve for each wave length. Then from the curves drawn outside the ’s atmosphere (Weighted Mean Curve, through these points the intensity corresponding to the 1920 and 1922),‘ in connection with atmos heric trans- sun’s altitude at latitude 41’ N. on June 21 was plotted mission coefficients for different wave lengtR s at Wash- for enrli hour from 8 a. m. or 6 p. m. to noon, apparent ington, D. C. and Mount Wilson, Calif.2 The data for time. skylight have been derived from Priest’s determinations The sun’s altitude at the different hours was obtained of the color temperature of skylightJs and “Ratios of by in berpola tion in Table 1, MONTHLYWEATHER REVIEW , direct solar radiation received on a horizontal surface to November, 1919, 47:771. diffuse radiation” given in Table 1 of this REVIEW By a similar rocess the curves for Figures 2 and 3 for October, 1924, above quoted. were drawn. Tfe process may be extended to any lati- The present paper is confined to a consideration of tude in the eastern part of the United States where the sections (a) , (b), and (c) of Table 3 of the above paper. It. atmospheric. conditions do not differ materially from will be remembered that section (a) showed the condi- those nt Washington. tions that prevailed at Washington on May 14, 1907, As is well known, with decrease in the sun’s nlbitude which was a t.ypical summer day, witsh some haze in the there is an increase in the prclportioE of t9hered and atmos here, but practically no clouds. Sect.ion (b) rays in direct! sunlight with respect to the blue or violet. ave t$. e conditions in the mean for the year on cloudless Figures 1 to 3 show that this is not true with respect to iays in Washington, and section (c) the conditions that the total (direct sunlight plus diffuse skylight) prevailed at Washington on February 15, 1907, which received on a horizontal surface. was a typical clear mnter day. For example, at noon and at 6 p. m. on June 21, with The present note is in response to a request that t,he the respective solar altitudes 73.4’ and 14.9’, the ratios data designated “TotalJ’ in the sections of Table 3 be of the radiation intensity at wave length 397 ni p to that presented in a forni convenient for determining the dis- at 556 m p are 0.57 and 0.82; at noon and 5 p. m. on Sep- tribution in the visible spectrum of the energy received on tember 21, with solar altitude 50.7’ and 11.9’, they are a horizontal surface on typical cloudless days during the 0.79 and 1.28; while at noon and 4 p. m. on November summer and fall months. June 31, September 3l? and 31, with solar altitudes 30.1’ and &lo, the ratios are November 31 were decided upon for the dates of these 0.54 and 1.73, respectively. typical days, and they were assumed to be in character The diurnal variation in the above ratios is due to similar to May 14,1907, in Washington, to an average clear the fact that while at noon the direct solar radiation re- day in Washington, and to February 15,1907, in Washing- ceived on a horizontal surface may be 6 to 8 times that ton, respectively. The aim has been to show from the receiyed diffusely from the sky, which latter may be de- data given in Table 2 the changes in the energy distribu- cidedly blue in color, the pro ortion is reduced to l, or tion in the short-wave radiation received from hour to ere.n less? as the sun approacR es within a few degrees of hour on a horizontal surface on the three selected dates. the horizon. For this urpose Figures 1,3,and 3 have been prepared, There is also an annual variation in the blueness of the in which t Ple ordinates give relative intensities of rudia- tot.al daylight for any given altitude of the sun, due to tion on an arbitrary scale. In all three fi rea a giren tlie increased richness in short-wave radiation of both value signifies tlie same intensity. The aT scissna give sunlight and skylight in the cooler months of the gear. the time.in hours from apparent noon. Tlie fi ures at- The bluer sunlight in the colder months is due to increased tached to each curve indicate the wave lengtlf of the atmospheric trunsmissibility, which is more marked in radiation to which it applies, expressed in mp. the short-wave radiation than in the longer waves. The To obtain the curves for Figure 1, (June 31 at latitude bluer skyli lit is due to a decrease both in the number 41’ N.), it was fiist.necessary to construct auxiliary and size oB the dust particles and witer droplets in the tttmosphere. * Abbot. C. 0. nnd o!hers. The distrlbution 01 energy in the spectra of the sun and - - -- .. .- .. -...... -.- -. - stars. Bmlthsonlan Miscellaneous Col.. V. 74, ho. ,, D. 15 and F~gure1. 2 Annals of the Astrophysical Observatory. Ymithsonian Instltution, 3335 and 1%. 4 LIW.tit. I Jour. Opt. 8oc. -4mer.. 1920.4: 483; 1821; 7: 38, 11M.

Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/25/21 10:48 AM UTC MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW 113

HOUR ANGLE OF SUN FROM THE MERIDIAN 1 2 a 4 5 0

400

360

320

2130

240

200

r.". .. --.e, ,.."..."....".a ." us#--"" ._U...,.. "I I-..--"- "....I"I. ."".""...... -.. 1-1- -.. -11 -""-."I.... ".-.-YIL-I." I"., Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/25/21 10:48 AM UTC Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/25/21 10:48 AM UTC .MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW 115

Fro. 3.-Energy distribution in daylight rewived on a horizontal surface st Istitu+ 41' N.on Novriiiher 21. Sky cloudless. (Wave lengths in rn c.) 44544-25t-2 ..

Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/25/21 10:48 AM UTC