Catecholamines: Knowledge and Understanding in the 1960S, Now, and in the Future

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Catecholamines: Knowledge and Understanding in the 1960S, Now, and in the Future BNA0010.1177/2398212818810682Brain and Neuroscience AdvancesStanford and Heal 810682review-article2019 Review Article Brain and Neuroscience Advances Volume 3: 1 –11 Catecholamines: Knowledge and © The Author(s) 2019 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions understanding in the 1960s, now, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2398212818810682 10.1177/2398212818810682 and in the future journals.sagepub.com/home/bna S. Clare Stanford1 and David J. Heal2 Abstract The late 1960s was a heyday for catecholamine research. Technological developments made it feasible to study the regulation of sympathetic neuronal transmission and to map the distribution of noradrenaline and dopamine in the brain. At last, it was possible to explain the mechanism of action of some important drugs that had been used in the clinic for more than a decade (e.g. the first generation of antidepressants) and to contemplate the rational development of new treatments (e.g. l-dihydroxyphenylalanine therapy, to compensate for the dopaminergic neuropathy in Parkinson’s disease, and β1-adrenoceptor antagonists as antihypertensives). The fact that drug targeting noradrenergic and/or dopaminergic transmission are still the first-line treatments for many psychiatric disorders (e.g. depression, schizophrenia, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) is a testament to the importance of these neurotransmitters and the research that has helped us to understand the regulation of their function. This article celebrates some of the highlights of research at that time, pays tribute to some of the subsequent landmark studies, and appraises the options for where it could go next. Keywords catecholamine; dopamine; drug development; noradrenaline Received: 12 February 2018 Introduction In the 1980s, the development of in vivo microdialysis, high- performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with electro- Until the late 1960s, most research of catecholamines focused on chemical detection, and fast cyclic voltammetry (see Anderzhanova measuring responses to noradrenaline in peripheral tissues in vitro and Wotjak, 2013; Young, 1993) made it possible to monitor in order to gain a better understanding of the function and regula- changes in the concentration of extracellular catecholamines of tion of the sympathoadrenal system. The low sensitivity of freely moving animals, following an experimental challenge. These noradrenaline assays meant that quantitative neurochemical stud- approaches are now complemented by a raft of brain imaging tech- ies were restricted to studying sympathetically innervated tissues niques, for example: positron emission tomography (PET; see of large species or (noradrenaline-storing) chromaffin cells from Finnema et al., 2015; Volkow et al., 2007), single-photon emission the adrenal medulla. Like sympathetic neurons, chromaffin cells computed tomography (SPECT), and functional magnetic reso- are activated by preganglionic cholinergic neurons and derive from nance imaging (fMRI; see Borsook et al., 2006; DeCharms, 2008). the same embryonic tissue, and so it was thought that they could However, unlike microdialysis and voltammetry, neuroimaging serve as a large-scale model for postganglionic sympathetic neu- techniques suffer the limitation that they provide only ‘snapshots’ rons: a prediction that turned out to be broadly correct. of the functional status of the brain of immobilised subjects. Three technical developments in the 1960s enabled rapid pro- A detailed and contemporary account of the state-of-the-sci- gress in catecholamine research: refinement of fluorescence his- ence of catecholamine research, 50 years ago, is to be found in tochemistry; development of a sensitive fluorometric assay for catecholamines; and production of radiolabels for biological molecules. Collectively, these technologies made detailed ana- 1 Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University tomical and neurochemical research on catecholamines in the College London, London, UK 2 periphery and, later, the brain, realistic objectives. However, RenaSci Ltd, Nottingham, UK research of dopamine lagged behind that of noradrenaline mainly Corresponding author: because it was hard to confirm that this catecholamine was pre- S. Clare Stanford, Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and sent in neurons that were phenotypically different from those that Pharmacology, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. contained noradrenaline. Email: [email protected] Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). 2 Brain and Neuroscience Advances Iversen (1967). A particularly striking point about that book is that of noradrenaline in peripheral neurons and the factors that influ- only the last chapter, which is relatively short, is devoted to cat- ence its release. It was even possible to expose a diurnal rhythm echolamines in the brain and it offers the tentative conclusion: ‘In for the noradrenaline content of the pineal gland. recent years, the evidence that noradrenaline and dopamine may By combining evidence from noradrenaline assays with elec- act as neurotransmitters in the central nervous system has become tron microscopy, it was confirmed that noradrenaline was con- progressively more convincing’. This comment speaks for itself. fined within membrane-bound (dense-core) vesicles that are This article highlights some of the ‘hot topics’ of the late 1960s, located in the terminal varicosities of sympathetic neurons (Bisby some key developments since then and how, in many cases, they and Fillenz, 1971). Such findings ratified the predicted analogy directly underpinned therapeutic developments. A testament to the between postganglionic sympathetic neurons and chromaffin pioneering work by Axelrod’s group at the National Institute of cells of the adrenal medulla. However, a leading question in the Mental Health (NIMH) and Arvid Carlsson (Lund) is that both were 1960s was how does noradrenaline gain access to the vesicles awarded Nobel prizes for their different contributions to the field. and, given the immense concentration gradient, how it could remain confined there? The latter question was explained by the discovery of an Neurobiology adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-Mg2+-dependent uptake process by neuronal vesicles (Potter and Axelrod, 1963). We now know Distribution that this is carried out by one of a family of transporters (VMAT2) Noradrenaline (‘sympathin’) had long been known to effect sym- whose structure and regulation is well understood (see Blakely pathetic neurotransmission and had been found in the brain in the and Edwards, 2012). Early on, it was clear that this vesicular mid-1940s, but the possibility that it served any specific purpose, uptake was a relatively non-specific process, which became an other than regulating the cerebral vasculature, was controversial integral feature of the explanation for the actions of the so-called (see Vogt, 1954). Refinement of the formaldehyde condensation ‘false transmitters’ (e.g. α-methylnoradrenaline and tyramine) histochemical reaction enabled catecholamines to be visualised and psychostimulants (see below). in freeze-dried tissues and, by the late 1960s, there was a swathe of publications, mapping their distribution in a range of species and organs. This effort revealed that noradrenaline within the Synthesis brain was confined to an anastomosing network of neurons, with The pathway for the synthesis of noradrenaline was predicted by clusters of cell bodies (nuclei) located in the brainstem. This Blaschko in the 1930s (see Blaschko, 1959). By the mid-1960s, it complex network strengthened the view that noradrenaline might was confirmed that all the enzymes needed for noradrenaline bio- have a direct influence on brain function, as Vogt had suggested synthesis are expressed by catecholamine-releasing neurons in many years before. The nucleus that has attracted the most inter- both the periphery and the brain and are delivered to their termi- est is the locus coeruleus because, despite containing remarkably nals by axoplasmic transport. However, by 1967, the details of few cell bodies (about 1500, bilaterally, in the rat), its neurons where in the neurons each step took place were still uncertain. An project to nearly all regions of the neuraxis and provide nearly important finding was that the enzyme, dopamine-β-hydroxylase half of all noradrenergic nerve terminals in the brain. (DβH), which converts dopamine to noradrenaline, is bound Dopamine was known to exist in specialised cells in periph- within the noradrenaline storage vesicles (see De Potter, 1971), eral tissues and its presence in the brain was reported in the late confirming that they are the location of the final step in the path- 1950s, together with its high concentration in the striatum way. This finding also helped resolve a long-term dispute over (Bertler and Rosengren, 1959) and nigrostriatal neurons (Anden the process of transmitter release (see below). et al., 1962). However, there was a lingering doubt that neuronal In the light of evidence that the tissue content of noradrena- stores of dopamine served merely as a store
Recommended publications
  • Methylphenidate Hydrochloride
    Application for Inclusion to the 22nd Expert Committee on the Selection and Use of Essential Medicines: METHYLPHENIDATE HYDROCHLORIDE December 7, 2018 Submitted by: Patricia Moscibrodzki, M.P.H., and Craig L. Katz, M.D. The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Graduate Program in Public Health New York NY, United States Contact: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3 Summary Statement Page 4 Focal Point Person in WHO Page 5 Name of Organizations Consulted Page 6 International Nonproprietary Name Page 7 Formulations Proposed for Inclusion Page 8 International Availability Page 10 Listing Requested Page 11 Public Health Relevance Page 13 Treatment Details Page 19 Comparative Effectiveness Page 29 Comparative Safety Page 41 Comparative Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Page 45 Regulatory Status Page 48 Pharmacoepial Standards Page 49 Text for the WHO Model Formulary Page 52 References Page 61 Appendix – Letters of Support 2 1. Summary Statement of the Proposal for Inclusion of Methylphenidate Methylphenidate (MPH), a central nervous system (CNS) stimulant, of the phenethylamine class, is proposed for inclusion in the WHO Model List of Essential Medications (EML) & the Model List of Essential Medications for Children (EMLc) for treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) under ICD-11, 6C9Z mental, behavioral or neurodevelopmental disorder, disruptive behavior or dissocial disorders. To date, the list of essential medications does not include stimulants, which play a critical role in the treatment of psychotic disorders. Methylphenidate is proposed for inclusion on the complimentary list for both children and adults. This application provides a systematic review of the use, efficacy, safety, availability, and cost-effectiveness of methylphenidate compared with other stimulant (first-line) and non-stimulant (second-line) medications.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson’S Disease: a Review of the Evidence
    Journal of Experimental Pharmacology Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article REVIEW Experimental Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of the Evidence This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Journal of Experimental Pharmacology Thomas Müller Abstract: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most chronic neurodegenerative disorder worldwide. Deficit of monoamines, particularly dopamine, causes an individually varying Department of Neurology, St. Joseph Hospital Berlin-Weissensee, Berlin, compilation of motor and non-motor features. Constraint of presynaptic uptake extends 13088, Germany monoamine stay in the synaptic cleft. This review discusses possible benefits of dopamine reuptake inhibition for the treatment of PD. Translation of this pharmacologic principle into positive clinical study results failed to date. Past clinical trial designs did not consider a mandatory, concomitant stable inhibition of glial monoamine turnover, i.e. with mono­ amine oxidase B inhibitors. These studies focused on improvement of motor behavior and levodopa associated motor complications, which are fluctuations of motor and non-motor behavior. Future clinical investigations in early, levodopa- and dopamine agonist naïve patients shall also aim on alleviation of non-motor symptoms, like fatigue, apathy or cognitive slowing. Oral levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor application is inevitably necessary with advance of PD. Monoamine reuptake (MRT) inhibition improves the efficacy of levodopa, the blood brain barrier crossing metabolic precursor of dopamine. The pulsatile brain delivery pattern of orally administered levodopa containing formulations results in synaptic dopamine variability. Ups and downs of dopamine counteract the physiologic principle of continuous neurotransmission, particularly in nigrostriatal, respectively meso­ corticolimbic pathways, both of which regulate motor respectively non-motor behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Upregulation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Α And
    Upregulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α and the lipid metabolism pathway promotes carcinogenesis of ampullary cancer Chih-Yang Wang, Ying-Jui Chao, Yi-Ling Chen, Tzu-Wen Wang, Nam Nhut Phan, Hui-Ping Hsu, Yan-Shen Shan, Ming-Derg Lai 1 Supplementary Table 1. Demographics and clinical outcomes of five patients with ampullary cancer Time of Tumor Time to Age Differentia survival/ Sex Staging size Morphology Recurrence recurrence Condition (years) tion expired (cm) (months) (months) T2N0, 51 F 211 Polypoid Unknown No -- Survived 193 stage Ib T2N0, 2.41.5 58 F Mixed Good Yes 14 Expired 17 stage Ib 0.6 T3N0, 4.53.5 68 M Polypoid Good No -- Survived 162 stage IIA 1.2 T3N0, 66 M 110.8 Ulcerative Good Yes 64 Expired 227 stage IIA T3N0, 60 M 21.81 Mixed Moderate Yes 5.6 Expired 16.7 stage IIA 2 Supplementary Table 2. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of an ampullary cancer microarray using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID). This table contains only pathways with p values that ranged 0.0001~0.05. KEGG Pathway p value Genes Pentose and 1.50E-04 UGT1A6, CRYL1, UGT1A8, AKR1B1, UGT2B11, UGT2A3, glucuronate UGT2B10, UGT2B7, XYLB interconversions Drug metabolism 1.63E-04 CYP3A4, XDH, UGT1A6, CYP3A5, CES2, CYP3A7, UGT1A8, NAT2, UGT2B11, DPYD, UGT2A3, UGT2B10, UGT2B7 Maturity-onset 2.43E-04 HNF1A, HNF4A, SLC2A2, PKLR, NEUROD1, HNF4G, diabetes of the PDX1, NR5A2, NKX2-2 young Starch and sucrose 6.03E-04 GBA3, UGT1A6, G6PC, UGT1A8, ENPP3, MGAM, SI, metabolism
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of the Inhibitory and Excitatory Effects of ADHD Medications Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine on Motor Cortex
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2006) 31, 442–449 & 2006 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0893-133X/06 $30.00 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Comparison of the Inhibitory and Excitatory Effects of ADHD Medications Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine on Motor Cortex ,1 2 3 1 1 4 Donald L Gilbert* , Keith R Ridel , Floyd R Sallee , Jie Zhang , Tara D Lipps and Eric M Wassermann 1 2 Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; University of Cincinnati 3 4 School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Division of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Brain Stimulation Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA Stimulant and norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitor medications have different effects at the neuronal level, but both reduce symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). To understand their common physiologic effects and thereby gain insight into the neurobiology of ADHD treatment, we compared the effects of the stimulant methylphenidate (MPH) and NE uptake inhibitor atomoxetine (ATX) on inhibitory and excitatory processes in human cortex. Nine healthy, right-handed adults were given a single, oral dose of 30 mg MPH and 60 mg ATX at visits separated by 1 week in a randomized, double-blind crossover trial. We used paired and single transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex to measure conditioned and unconditioned motor-evoked potential amplitudes at inhibitory (3 ms) and facilitatory (10 ms) interstimulus intervals (ISI) before and after drug administration. Data were analyzed with repeated measures, mixed model regression. We also analyzed our findings and the published literature with meta-analysis software to estimate treatment effects of stimulants and NE reuptake inhibitors on these TMS measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthetic Cathinones ("Bath Salts")
    Synthetic Cathinones ("Bath Salts") What are synthetic cathinones? Synthetic cathinones, more commonly known as "bath salts," are synthetic (human- made) drugs chemically related to cathinone, a stimulant found in the khat plant. Khat is a shrub grown in East Africa and southern Arabia, and people sometimes chew its leaves for their mild stimulant effects. Synthetic variants of cathinone can be much stronger than the natural product and, in some cases, very dangerous (Baumann, 2014). In Name Only Synthetic cathinone products Synthetic cathinones are marketed as cheap marketed as "bath salts" should substitutes for other stimulants such as not be confused with products methamphetamine and cocaine, and products such as Epsom salts that people sold as Molly (MDMA) often contain synthetic use during bathing. These cathinones instead (s ee "Synthetic Cathinones bathing products have no mind- and Molly" on page 3). altering ingredients. Synthetic cathinones usually take the form of a white or brown crystal-like powder and are sold in small plastic or foil packages labeled "not for human consumption." Also sometimes labeled as "plant food," "jewelry cleaner," or "phone screen cleaner," people can buy them online and in drug paraphernalia stores under a variety of brand names, which include: Flakka Bloom Cloud Nine Lunar Wave Vanilla Sky White Lightning Scarface Image courtesy of www.dea.gov/pr/multimedia- library/image-gallery/bath-salts/bath-salts04.jpg Synthetic Cathinones • January 2016 • Page 1 How do people use synthetic cathinones? People typically swallow, snort, smoke, or inject synthetic cathinones. How do synthetic cathinones affect the brain? Much is still unknown about how synthetic cathinones affect the human brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Mice with Altered Dopamine Transporter and Vesicular Monoamine Transporter 2 Levels
    Characterization of Mice with Altered Dopamine Transporter and Vesicular Monoamine Transporter 2 Levels by Shababa Tanzeel Masoud A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Toronto © Copyright by Shababa Tanzeel Masoud 2017 Characterization of Mice with Altered Dopamine Transporter and Vesicular Monoamine Transporter 2 Levels Shababa Tanzeel Masoud Doctor of Philosophy Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Toronto 2017 Abstract Dopamine is a key neurotransmitter that regulates motor coordination and dysfunction of the dopamine system gives rise to Parkinson’s disease. Nigrostriatal dopamine neurons are vulnerable to various genetic and environmental insults, suggesting that these cells are inherently at-risk. A cell-specific risk factor for these neurons is the neurotransmitter, dopamine itself. If intracellular dopamine is not appropriately sequestered into vesicles, it can accumulate in the cytosol. Cytosolic dopamine is highly reactive and can trigger oxidative stress, leading to cellular toxicity. Cytosolic dopamine levels are modulated by the plasma membrane dopamine transporter (DAT) that takes up dopamine from the extracellular space, and the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) that stores dopamine into vesicles. In this thesis, we altered DAT and VMAT2 levels to investigate the detrimental consequences of potentially amplifying cytosolic dopamine in transgenic mice. Project 1 focused on selective over-expression of DAT in dopaminergic cells of transgenic mice (DAT-tg). DAT-tg mice displayed phenotypes of dopaminergic damage: increased dopamine-specific oxidative stress, L-DOPA-reversible fine motor deficits and enhanced sensitivity to toxicant insult, suggesting that increasing DAT- mediated dopamine uptake is detrimental for dopamine cells.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11.7.2011 SEC(2011)
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11.7.2011 SEC(2011) 912 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER on the assessment of the functioning of Council Decision 2005/387/JHA on the information exchange, risk assessment and control of new psychoactive substances Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION on the assessment of the functioning of Council Decision 2005/387/JHA on the information exchange, risk assessment and control of new psychoactive substances {COM(2011) 430 final} EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction...................................................................................................................3 2. Methodology.................................................................................................................4 3. Key findings from the 2002 evaluation of the Joint Action on synthetic drugs ...........5 4. Overview of notifications, types of substances and trends at EU level 2005-2010......7 5. Other EU legislation relevant for the regulation of new psychoactive substances.....12 6. Functioning of the Council Decision on new psychoactive substances .....................16 7. Findings of the survey among Member States............................................................17 7.1. Assessment of the Council Decision ..........................................................................17 7.2. Stages in the functioning of the Council Decision .....................................................18 7.3. National responses to new psychoactive substances ..................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Compositions and Methods for Selective Delivery of Oligonucleotide Molecules to Specific Neuron Types
    (19) TZZ ¥Z_T (11) EP 2 380 595 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 26.10.2011 Bulletin 2011/43 A61K 47/48 (2006.01) C12N 15/11 (2006.01) A61P 25/00 (2006.01) A61K 49/00 (2006.01) (2006.01) (21) Application number: 10382087.4 A61K 51/00 (22) Date of filing: 19.04.2010 (84) Designated Contracting States: • Alvarado Urbina, Gabriel AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR Nepean Ontario K2G 4Z1 (CA) HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL • Bortolozzi Biassoni, Analia Alejandra PT RO SE SI SK SM TR E-08036, Barcelona (ES) Designated Extension States: • Artigas Perez, Francesc AL BA ME RS E-08036, Barcelona (ES) • Vila Bover, Miquel (71) Applicant: Nlife Therapeutics S.L. 15006 La Coruna (ES) E-08035, Barcelona (ES) (72) Inventors: (74) Representative: ABG Patentes, S.L. • Montefeltro, Andrés Pablo Avenida de Burgos 16D E-08014, Barcelon (ES) Edificio Euromor 28036 Madrid (ES) (54) Compositions and methods for selective delivery of oligonucleotide molecules to specific neuron types (57) The invention provides a conjugate comprising nucleuc acid toi cell of interests and thus, for the treat- (i) a nucleic acid which is complementary to a target nu- ment of diseases which require a down-regulation of the cleic acid sequence and which expression prevents or protein encoded by the target nucleic acid as well as for reduces expression of the target nucleic acid and (ii) a the delivery of contrast agents to the cells for diagnostic selectivity agent which is capable of binding with high purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • What Every Clinician Should Know Before Starting a Patient on Meds
    CARING FOR CHILDREN WITH ADHD: A RESOURCE TOOLKIT FOR CLINICIANS, 2ND EDITION Basic Facts: What Every Clinician Should Know Before Starting a Patient on Medication Studies have shown that treatment for attention-deficit/ • If you reach the maximum recommended dose without • hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with medication is effective in noticeable improvement in symptoms, try a different stimulant treating the symptoms of ADHD alone or in combination with medication class. Approximately 80% of children will respond to behavioral interventions. at least 1 of the 2 stimulant classes tried. • Stimulant medications also improve academic productivity but • When changing medications, be careful about the dose not cognitive abilities or academic skills. equivalence of different stimulant medication classes; in general, equivalent doses for dexmethylphenidate and Stimulants can help reduce oppositional, aggressive, impulsive, • amphetamine-based stimulants are approximately half of a and delinquent behaviors in some children. methylphenidate dose. Several types of medications are Food and Drug Administration Non-stimulant medications may require 2 or more weeks to see • (FDA)-approved for the treatment of ADHD. • effects, so you should titrate up more slowly than you would • Stimulant medications: methylphenidate, dexmethylphenidate, for stimulant medications. Obtaining follow-up rating scales is dextroamphetamine, mixed amphetamine salts, even more important than for stimulant medications because lisdexamfetamine changes are more gradual. • Non-stimulant medications: atomoxetine, and extended-release • Managing side effects effectively can improve adherence to and guanfacine and clonidine satisfaction with stimulant medications. When choosing which stimulant and dose to start first, consider • Common side effects to discuss with families include • stomachache, headache, decreased appetite, sleep problems, Family preference and experience with the medication, including • and behavioral rebound.
    [Show full text]
  • Do You Know... Cocaine
    Do You Know... Street names: blow, C, coke, crack, flake, freebase, rock, snow Cocaine What is cocaine? Cocaine is a stimulant drug. Stimulants make people feel more alert and energetic. Cocaine can also make people feel euphoric, or “high.” Pure cocaine was first isolated from the leaves of the coca bush in 1860. Researchers soon discovered that cocaine numbs whatever tissues it touches, leading to its use as a local anesthetic. Today, we mostly use synthetic anesthetics, rather than cocaine. In the 1880s, psychiatrist Sigmund Freud wrote scientific papers that praised cocaine as a treatment for many ailments, including depression and alcohol and opioid addiction. After this, cocaine became widely and legally available in patent medicines and soft drinks. As cocaine use increased, people began to discover its dangers. In 1911, Canada passed laws restricting the importation, manufacture, sale and possession of cocaine. The use of 1/4 © 2003, 2010 CAMH | www.camh.ca cocaine declined until the 1970s, when it became known How does cocaine make you feel? for its high cost, and for the rich and glamorous people How cocaine makes you feel depends on: who used it. Cheaper “crack” cocaine became available · how much you use in the 1980s. · how often and how long you use it · how you use it (by injection, orally, etc.) Where does cocaine come from? · your mood, expectation and environment Cocaine is extracted from the leaves of the Erythroxylum · your age (coca) bush, which grows on the slopes of the Andes · whether you have certain medical or psychiatric Mountains in South America.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Overview of Psychiatric Pharmacotherapy
    A Brief Overview of Psychiatric Pharmacotherapy Joel V. Oberstar, M.D. Chief Executive Officer Disclosures • Some medications discussed are not approved by the FDA for use in the population discussed/described. • Some medications discussed are not approved by the FDA for use in the manner discussed/described. • Co-Owner: – PrairieCare and PrairieCare Medical Group – Catch LLC Disclaimer The contents of this handout are for informational purposes only and are not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical or psychiatric condition. Never disregard professional/medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read in this handout. Material in this handout may be copyrighted by the author or by third parties; reasonable efforts have been made to give attribution where appropriate. Caveat Regarding the Role of Medication… Neuroscience Overview Mind Over Matter, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health. Available at: http://teens.drugabuse.gov/mom/index.asp. http://medicineworld.org/images/news-blogs/brain-700997.jpg Neuroscience Overview Mind Over Matter, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health. Available at: http://teens.drugabuse.gov/mom/index.asp. Neurotransmitter Receptor Source: National Institute on Drug Abuse Common Diagnoses and Associated Medications • Psychotic Disorders – Antipsychotics • Bipolar Disorders – Mood Stabilizers, Antipsychotics, & Antidepressants • Depressive Disorders – Antidepressants • Anxiety Disorders – Antidepressants & Anxiolytics • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder – Stimulants, Antidepressants, 2-Adrenergic Agents, & Strattera Classes of Medications • Anti-depressants • Stimulants and non-stimulant alternatives • Anti-psychotics (a.k.a.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Nicotinic Receptor Agonists
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by PubMed Central The Open Medicinal Chemistry Journal, 2010, 4, 37-56 37 Open Access 7 Nicotinic Receptor Agonists: Potential Therapeutic Drugs for Treatment of Cognitive Impairments in Schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s Disease Jun Toyohara, and Kenji Hashimoto* Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Chiba University Center for Forensic Mental Health, Chiba, Japan Abstract: Accumulating evidence suggests that 7 nicotinic receptors (7 nAChRs), a subtype of nAChRs, play a role in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric diseases, including schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). A number of psychopharmacological and genetic studies shown that 7 nAChRs play an important role in the deficits of P50 auditory evoked potential in patients with schizophrenia, and that 7 nAChR agonists would be potential therapeutic drugs for cognitive impairments associated with P50 deficits in schizophrenia. Furthermore, some studies have demonstrated that 7 nAChRs might play a key role in the amyloid- (A)-mediated pathology of AD, and that 7 nAChR agonists would be potential therapeutic drugs for A deposition in the brains of patients with AD. Interestingly, the altered expression of 7 nAChRs in the postmortem brain tissues from patients with schizophrenia and AD has been reported. Based on all these findings, selective 7 nAChR agonists can be considered potential therapeutic drugs for cognitive impairments in both schizophrenia and AD. In this article, we review the recent research into the role of 7 nAChRs in the pathophysiology of these diseases and into the potential use of novel 7 nAChR agonists as therapeutic drugs. Keywords: 7 Nicotinic receptors, Cognition, Schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease.
    [Show full text]