Deep-Diving Cetaceans of the Gulf of Mexico: Acoustic Ecology and Response to Natural and Anthropogenic Forces Including the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Deep-Diving Cetaceans of the Gulf of Mexico: Acoustic Ecology and Response to Natural and Anthropogenic Forces Including the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Deep-Diving Cetaceans of the Gulf of Mexico: Acoustic Ecology and Response to Natural and Anthropogenic Forces Including the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Adissertationsubmittedinpartialsatisfactionofthe requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Oceanography by Karlina Paul Merkens Committee in charge: John Hildebrand, Chair Jay Barlow Phil Hastings William Hodgkiss James Neih 2013 Copyright Karlina Paul Merkens, 2013 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Karlina Paul Merkens is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2013 iii DEDICATION To Lillian Irene, my inspiration, motivation, and the apple of my eye. And to Michael, today, tomorrow, and forever. iv EPIGRAPH I must go down to the seas again, to the lonely sea and the sky, And all I ask is a tall ship and a star to steer her by, And the wheel’s kick and the wind’s song and the white sail’s shaking, And a grey mist on the sea’s face, and a grey dawn breaking. I must go down to the seas again, for the call of the running tide Is a wild call and a clear call that may not be denied; And all I ask is a windy day with the white clouds flying, And the flung spray and the blown spume, and the sea-gulls crying. I must go down to the seas again, to the vagrant gypsy life, To the gull’s way and the whale’s way, where the wind’s like a whetted knife; And all I ask is a merry yarn from a laughing fellow-rover, And quiet sleep and a sweet dream when the long trick’s over. —SeaFever,JohnMasefield v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page . iii Dedication . iv Epigraph ..................................... v TableofContents................................. vi List of Figures . ix List of Tables . xi Acknowledgements ................................ xii VitaandPublications .............................. xv Abstract of the Dissertation . xvii Chapter1 Introduction ........................... 1 1.1 Cetaceans .......................... 1 1.2 Deep-DivingCetaceans . 2 1.3 TheGulfofMexico ..................... 6 1.4 The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill . 8 1.5 Data Collection and Analysis Overview . 10 1.6 Summary .......................... 10 Chapter2 DataAcquisitionandProcessing . 13 2.1 Acoustic Data . 13 2.1.1 Instrumentation and Sites . 13 2.1.2 Analysis of Recordings . 17 2.2 EnvironmentalData . 20 2.2.1 DataFromHARPs . 20 2.2.2 Data from Satellites and Other Sources . 23 2.3 DataExploration ...................... 28 2.4 Trend Analysis . 33 2.4.1 Seasonal and Oil-spill related trends . 33 2.4.2 Diel patterns . 34 2.5 HabitatModeling ...................... 35 2.5.1 Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) . 35 2.5.2 Zero-inflated Negative Binomial (ZINB) GeneralizedLinearModels . 37 2.6 Summary .......................... 39 vi Chapter 3 Sperm whale ecology and habitat modeling . 40 3.1 Abstract . 40 3.2 Introduction to Sperm Whales . 41 3.2.1 General Biology and Distribution . 41 3.2.2 Social Structure and Behavior . 41 3.2.3 Temporal Patterns . 43 3.2.4 HabitatPreferences . 44 3.2.5 Acoustics . 45 3.3 Sperm-WhaleSpecificMethods . 45 3.4 Results of Exploratory Analysis . 45 3.5 Results and Discussion of Trend Analysis . 48 3.5.1 Diel patterns . 48 3.5.2 Seasonal trends . 51 3.5.3 Oil-spill related trends . 54 3.6 Results and Discussion of GAMs and ZINB models . 58 3.6.1 Sperm whales at Mississippi Canyon . 59 3.6.2 SpermwhalesatGreenCanyon . 63 3.6.3 SpermwhalesatDryTortugas. 67 3.7 Summary .......................... 71 Chapter 4 Beaked whale ecology and habitat modeling . 74 4.1 Abstract . 74 4.2 Introduction . 75 4.2.1 General Biology, Behavior, Social Structure and Distribution . 75 4.2.2 Temporal Patterns . 78 4.2.3 HabitatPreferences . 78 4.2.4 Acoustics . 79 4.3 BeakedWhaleSpecificMethods . 79 4.4 Results of Exploratory Analysis . 81 4.5 Results and Discussion of Trend Analysis . 86 4.5.1 Diel patterns . 86 4.5.2 Seasonal trends . 92 4.5.3 Oil-spill related trends . 97 4.6 Results and Discussion of GAMs and ZINB models . 103 4.6.1 Cuvier’sBeakedWhales . 103 4.6.2 Gervais’beakedwhales . 112 4.7 Summary .......................... 119 Chapter 5 Kogia spp. ecology and habitat modeling . 122 5.1 Abstract . 122 5.2 Introduction to Kogia spp. 123 5.2.1 General Biology . 123 vii 5.2.2 Distribution, Habitat Preferences, Behavior and TemporalPatterns . 124 5.2.3 Acoustics . 126 5.3 Kogia SpecificMethods. 127 5.4 Results of Exploratory Analysis . 128 5.5 Results of Trend Analysis . 130 5.5.1 Diel patterns . 130 5.5.2 Seasonal trends . 132 5.5.3 Oil-spill related trends . 135 5.6 Results and Discussion of ZINB models . 137 5.6.1 Kogia spp. atMississippiCanyon . 138 5.6.2 Kogia spp. atGreenCanyon. 140 5.6.3 Kogia spp. at Dry Tortugas . 142 5.7 Summary .......................... 144 Bibliography . 146 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: Gulf of Mexico Bathymetry and Circulation . 7 Figure 1.2: Extent of Cumulative Surface Oil from Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill . 9 Figure 1.3: Gulf of Mexico Deep Water HARP locations . 11 Figure 2.1: HARP schematic . 14 Figure 2.2: HARP Reording Effort....................... 16 Figure 2.3: Long Term Spectral Average example . 18 Figure2.4: AISExample ............................ 21 Figure 2.5: Example of vessel detections in HARP data. 22 Figure2.6: Timeseriesofnumberofboatsperday. 22 Figure2.7: Timeseriesofnoiseat40Hz . 23 Figure 2.8: Example spectrograms with and without air guns . 24 Figure 2.9: Single Image Edge Detection example . 27 Figure 2.10: Example Histograms and QQ plots . 29 Figure 2.11: Example Cleveland Dot Plots of Transformed Data . 31 Figure2.12:ExamplePairsPlot. 32 Figure 2.13: Example tweedie profile plot . 36 Figure 3.1: Sperm whale distribution . 42 Figure3.2: Timeseriesofspermwhaledetections . 47 Figure3.3: Dielpatternsofspermwhales . 50 Figure 3.4: Box plot of seasonal sperm whale detections . 53 Figure 3.5: Box plot of sperm whale detections in summer 2010 and 2011 . 55 Figure 3.6: Example plots of slopes of sperm whale detections before and after breakpoints . 57 Figure3.7: Modeledpartialfits forsperm whalesatMC. 60 Figure 3.8: Modeled partial fits for sperm whales at GC . 64 Figure 3.9: Modeledpartial fits forsperm whales atDT . 68 Figure 3.10: Sea Surface Height Anomaly June 2011 . 70 Figure 4.1: Global distribution of beaked whale species . 77 Figure 4.2: Time series of Cuvier’s beaked whale detections . 82 Figure 4.3: Time series of Gervais’ beaked whale detections . 83 Figure4.4: TimeseriesofBWGdetections . 84 Figure 4.5: Diel patterns of Cuvier’s beaked whales . 88 Figure4.6: DielpatternsofGervais’beakedwhales . 89 Figure4.7: Dielpatternsofbeakedwhales . 90 Figure 4.8: Box plot of seasonal Cuvier’s beaked whale detections . 93 Figure 4.9: Box plot of seasonal Gervais’ beaked whale detections . 94 ix Figure 4.10: Box plots of Cuvier’s beaked whale detections in summers 2010 and 2011 . 98 Figure 4.11: Box plots of Gervais’ beaked whale detections in summers 2010 and 2011 . 99 Figure 4.12: Box plots of BWG detections in summers 2010 and 2011 . 100 Figure 4.13: Modeled partial fits for Cuvier’s beaked whales at MC . 105 Figure 4.14: Modeled partial fits for Cuvier’s beaked whales at GC . 108 Figure 4.15: Modeled partial fits for Cuvier’s beaked whales at DT . 110 Figure 4.16: Modeled partial fits for Gervais’ beaked whales at MC . 113 Figure 4.17: Modeled partial fits for Gervais’ beaked whales at GC . 116 Figure 4.18: Modeled partial fits for Gervais’ beaked whales at DT . 118 Figure 5.1: Global distribution of Kogia spp. 125 Figure 5.2: Time series of Kogia spp detections . 129 Figure 5.3: Diel patterns of Kogia spp. 131 Figure 5.4: Box plot of seasonal Kogia spp. detections . 133 Figure 5.5: Box plots of Kogia spp. detections in summers 2010 and 2011 . 136 Figure 5.6: Modeled partial fits for Kogia spp. at MC . 139 Figure 5.7: Modeled partial fits for Kogia spp. at GC . 141 Figure 5.8: Modeled partial fits for Kogia spp. at DT . 143 x LIST OF TABLES Table2.1: HARPdeploymentsummary . 15 Table2.2: SummaryofSpeciesDetectionsbySite . 20 Table3.1: Zero-inflationofspermwhaledataset . 46 Table3.2: Dielpatternsofspermwhales . 49 Table 3.3: Trends in sperm whale detections before and after oil-spill- related breakpoints . 56 Table 3.4: Selected habitat models for sperm whales . 58 Table4.1: Zero-inflationofbeakedwhaledataset . 85 Table 4.2: Diel patterns of Cuvier’s beaked whales . 87 Table4.3: DielpatternsofGervais’beakedwhales . 87 Table4.4: DielpatternsofBWG. 87 Table 4.5: Trends in Cuvier’s beaked whale detections before and after oil- spill-related breakpoints . 101 Table 4.6: Trends in Gervais’ beaked whale detections before and after oil- spill-related breakpoints . 101 Table 4.7: Selected habitat models for Cuvier’s beaked whales . 104 Table 4.8: Selected habitat Models for Gervais’ beaked whales . 112 Table 5.1: Zero-inflation of Kogia spp. data set . 128 Table 5.2: Diel patterns of Kogia spp. 132 Table 5.3: Trends in Kogia spp. detections before and after oil-spill-related breakpoints . 135 Table 5.4: Selected habitat models for Kogia spp. 137 xi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Iwouldliketothankmyadvisor,JohnHildebrand,for6+yearsof assistance and guidance, and for providing numerous opportunities to spend time at sea and unlimited access to an truly remarkable quantity of archived data. I would also like to thank my committee, Jay Barlow, Phil Hastings, Bill Hodgkiss and James Nieh, for helping with this project from the beginning to the end. The staffin the SIO grad office deserve a huge thanks for their emotional and administrative assistance from well before I was accepted as a student. Their continual support of the grad students at SIO is absolutely essential and a major component of what makes Scripps such an amazing place.
Recommended publications
  • Research Underway: Bangarang Data Entry Program ~ Users' Manual
    RU: Bangarang 1.0 Users Manual Keen 2013 Research Underway: Bangarang Data Entry Program ~ Users’ Manual Developed by Eric Keen Scripps Institution of Oceanography Summer 2013 [email protected] CONTENTS_________________________________________________________________________________________ Introduction ………………………………………. 1 Where to Download………………………………. 1 Getting Started……………………………………. 1 Output: Overview………………………………… 3 Output: Standard Fields……………………....... 4 Output: Event Details ………………………….. 5 Appendix 1: Example output………………........ 24 Appendix 2: RUB Abbreviations……………….. 25 INTRODUCTION____________________________________________________________________________________ RU Bangarang (RUB) is a data entry program designed specifically for my dissertation work in the northern Great Bear Fjordland. It is designed to be an easily viewed, intuitive, button-based way of entering observations while letting the computer take care of associating each entry with the necessary but intensive logistical data (time, gps coordinates, current conditions, observers on board, effort status, etc.). The forms are designed to be navigated by using the mouse, using the tab key, or using the touch screen. It is also designed to output these data in a single file that can serve as both a raw record of the day's work and a single source from which to draw certain types of data (e.g. locations of hydrophone recordings and the locations of sighted whales). These, at least, were my intentions. The program was written in Visual Basic 2010 Express and published as a stand-alone executable file (.exe) for Windows. The program outputs text files to a folder it creates on the C directory of your computer. In addition to making this program available to others, I have provided the project files for the program, as well as my R scripts for analyzing the output text files, on my website.
    [Show full text]
  • Robot Swarm Based on Ant Foraging Hypothesis with Adaptive Lèvy Flights
    Robot Swarm based on Ant Foraging Hypothesis with Adaptive Lèvy Flights A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering of the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences by Aditya Milind Deshpande B.E. University of Pune August 2014 Committee Chair: Dr. Manish Kumar, Ph.D. Abstract Robot Swarm based on Ant Foraging Hypothesis with Adaptive Levy´ Flights by Aditya Milind Deshpande Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science Degree in Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering University of Cincinnati June 2017 Design of robot swarms inspired by self-organization in social insect groups is currently an active research area with a diverse portfolio of potential applications. This thesis is focused on the development of control laws for swarm of robots inspired by ant foraging. Particularly, this work presents control laws for efficient area coverage by a robot swarm in a 2D spatial domain, inspired by the unique dynamical characteristics of ant foraging. The novel idea pursued in the effort is that dynamic, adaptive switching between Brownian motion and Levy´ flight in the stochastic component of the search increases the efficiency of the search and area coverage. The study is motivated by behaviors of certain biological studies who exhibit searching patterns modeled using Levy´ flight. Influence of different pheromone (the virtual chemotactic agent that drives the foraging) threshold values for switching between Levy´ flights and Brownian motion is studied using two performance metrics - area coverage and visit entropy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Riddle of Spinosaurus Aegyptiacus' Dorsal Sail
    Geol. Mag. 153 (3), 2016, pp. 544–547. c Cambridge University Press 2015. This is an Open Access article, distributed 544 under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/S0016756815000801 RAPID COMMUNICATION The riddle of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus’ dorsal sail ∗ JAN GIMSA †, ROBERT SLEIGH‡ & ULRIKE GIMSA§ ∗ University of Rostock, Chair for Biophysics, Gertrudenstr. 11A, 18057 Rostock, Germany ‡Sleigh Technical Translations, Wundstrasse 5, 14059 Berlin, Germany §Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Institute of Behavioural Physiology, Wilhelm-Stahl-Allee 2, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany (Received 24 February 2015; accepted 28 September 2015; first published online 17 November 2015) Abstract A second, that the spines supported a muscle or fat-lined hump (Bailey, 1997) was dismissed in favour of Stromer’s Spinosaurus aegyptiacus was probably the largest predatory (1915) hypothesis of convergent evolution with the skin- dinosaur of the Cretaceous period. A new study shows that it covered neural spines of the crested chameleon. Based on the was a semiaquatic hunter. The function of Spinosaurus’ huge idea that the sail was tightly enveloped in skin, the authors dorsal ‘sail’ remains unsolved, however. Three hypotheses proposed that it was used largely for display on land and in have been proposed: (1) thermoregulation; (2) humpback water to deter foes and competitors or to impress potential storage; or (3) display. According to our alternative hypo- sexual partners, and that it would have remained visible while thesis, the submerged sail would have improved manoeuv- swimming.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Tagging of Large Sharks – Potential for Acoustic Interference
    CITIZEN SCIENCE – CS 05-11-17) Acoustic tagging of large sharks – Potential for acoustic interference (CS 05-11-17) – Kim Allen independent researcher Citizen science overview This paper is one of a series of unfunded, independent research initiatives that question mainstream science, Animal ethics approaches and Governments’ apparent acceptance of “Validated” science in the area of wildlife electronic tracking. Clearly, the Australian shark issue is extremely contentious as well as political and emotionally charged. Over $100 million has been expended by State and Federal governments in an attempt to find answers and make our beaches safer. Unfortunately, at no stage has a strategic approach been taken to identify the key disciplines of science that need to be considered, assessed, and applied. Significant investment has been directed into the construction and support of wide-scale acoustic receiver arrays and individual sensors as well as significant tagging of large sharks off our coastline for research and public safety. Previous satellite archival tagging programs conducted by CSIRO gave us good insight into shark movements, however since this time despite significant investment minimal progress appears to have been made and the potential risks appear to have been ignored. This CSIRO document clearly outlines the types of tags that are used for shark research, it also clearly defines the recommended protocols that should be used for shark tagging operations. From photographic details shared in the public domain it is clear that shark tagging operations undertaken by Fisheries departments don’t follow these stringent protocols. (www.cmar.csiro.au/e-print/open/2009/bradfordrw a.pdf ) It is extremely difficult for “Unqualified” Citizen scientists to challenge mainstream research particularly given the potential erosion of future funding sources if technical criticism is determined as valid.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Padre in September by Charles A. Golla
    of the water. Trout, redfish and whiting fol- low the bait activity from below, under the action. As the feeding activity intensifies, the bait ball will move in and out of casting range. The longer bait ball stays together, the greater the chance that jack crevalle and tarpon will move in around the edges. Bull and blacktip sharks will follow the jack crevalle. If the bait ball is moving north or south and in and out of casting range, the feeding frenzy is relatively fresh. As the bait wears down, it starts moving in a cir- cular pattern and indicates the frenzy has gone on for some time. It is at this point that you have the greatest chance of see- Charles Golla with Spanish Mackerel ing tarpon and a large concentration of Photo by Charles Golla game fish. Mullet are good indicators of structure and the presence of game fish. If you Fishing Padre in September by Charles A. Golla see mullet lazily moving through one of the bars, there’s a good chance that no September is one of the best months for This includes locating bait concentrations game fish are present. If you see mullet fishing the Padre Island National Seashore and reading the surf structure. all pushed up along the edge or frantically (PINS) because the Fall baitfish migration Baitfish, Birds, and Slicks jumping as they pass over a particular bar is in full force and hungry game fish are Fishing at this time of the year will be or structure, game fish are close by feed- sure to follow.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 75/Wednesday, April 21, 2021
    21082 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Network, and the Wishtoyo Foundation Manning, NMFS, Office of Protected filed a complaint seeking court-ordered National Oceanic and Atmospheric Resources, 301–427–8466. deadlines for the issuance of proposed Administration SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and final rules to designate critical habitat for the CAM, MX, and WNP 50 CFR Parts 223, 224, and 226 Background DPSs of humpback whales. See Center Under the ESA, we are responsible for for Biological Diversity et al. v. National [Docket No. 210415–0080] determining whether certain species are Marine Fisheries Service, et al., No. threatened or endangered, and, to the 3:18–cv–01628–EDL (N.D. Cal.). The RIN 0648–BI06 maximum extent prudent and parties entered into a settlement determinable, designating critical agreement with the approval and Endangered and Threatened Wildlife habitat for endangered and threatened oversight of the court, and subsequently and Plants: Designating Critical species at the time of listing (16 U.S.C. amended the dates specified in the Habitat for the Central America, 1533(a)(3)(A)(i)). On September 8, 2016, original order. The amended settlement Mexico, and Western North Pacific we published a final rule that revised agreement stipulated that NMFS submit Distinct Population Segments of the listing of humpback whales under a proposed determination concerning Humpback Whales the ESA by removing the original, the designation of critical habitat for taxonomic-level species listing, and in these three DPSs to the Federal Register AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries its place listing four DPSs as endangered by September 26, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Animating Predator and Prey Fish Interactions
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Computer Science Dissertations Department of Computer Science 5-6-2019 Animating Predator and Prey Fish Interactions Sahithi Podila Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cs_diss Recommended Citation Podila, Sahithi, "Animating Predator and Prey Fish Interactions." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2019. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cs_diss/149 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Computer Science at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Computer Science Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANIMATING PREDATOR AND PREY FISH INTERACTIONS by SAHITHI PODILA Under the Direction of Ying Zhu, PhD ABSTRACT Schooling behavior is one of the most salient social and group activities among fish. They form schools for social reasons like foraging, mating and escaping from predators. Animating a school of fish is difficult because they are large in number, often swim in distinctive patterns that is they take the shape of long thin lines, squares, ovals or amoeboid and exhibit complex coordinated patterns especially when they are attacked by a predator. Previous work in computer graphics has not provided satisfactory models to simulate the many distinctive interactions between a school of prey fish and their predator, how does a predator pick its target? and how does a school of fish react to such attacks? This dissertation presents a method to simulate interactions between prey fish and predator fish in the 3D world based on the biological research findings.
    [Show full text]
  • 0251 AES Behavior & Ecology, 552 AB, Friday 9 July 2010 Jeff
    0251 AES Behavior & Ecology, 552 AB, Friday 9 July 2010 Jeff Kneebone1, Gregory Skomal2, John Chisholm2 1University of Massachusetts Dartmouth; School for Marine Science and Technology, New Bedford, Massachusetts, United States, 2Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, New Bedford, Massachusetts, United States Spatial and Temporal Habitat Use and Movement Patterns of Neonatal and Juvenile Sand Tiger Sharks, Carcharias taurus, in a Massachusetts Estuary In recent years, an increasing number of neonate and juvenile sand tiger sharks (Carcharias taurus) have been incidentally taken by fishermen in Plymouth, Kingston, Duxbury (PKD) Bay, a 10,200 acre tidal estuary located on the south shore of Massachusetts. There are indications that the strong seasonal presence (late spring to early fall) of sand tigers in this area is a relatively new phenomenon as local fishermen claim that they had never seen this species in large numbers until recently. We utilized passive acoustic telemetry to monitor seasonal residency, habitat use, site fidelity, and fine scale movements of 35 sand tigers (79 – 120 cm fork length; age 0 - 1) in PKD Bay. Sharks were tracked within PKD Bay for periods of 5 – 88 days during September – October, 2008 and June – October, 2009. All movement data are currently being analyzed to quantify spatial and temporal habitat use, however, preliminary analyses suggest that sharks display a high degree of site fidelity to several areas of PKD Bay. Outside PKD Bay, we documented broader regional movements throughout New England. Collectively, these data demonstrate the that both PKD Bay and New England coastal waters serve as nursery and essential fish habitat (EFH) for neonatal and juvenile sand tiger sharks.
    [Show full text]
  • AJ3 – M Fournet, Karpowership Marine Acoustic Ecology Expert Input
    "AJ3" JUDICIAL REVIEW – ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATION FOR THREE PROPOSED GAS TO POWER POWERSHIP PROJECTS LED BY KARPOWERSHIP SA (PTY) LTD – MARINE ACOUSTIC ECOLOGY EXPERT INPUT Michelle Fournet, M.S., PhD OVERVIEW: This report contains an expert opinion assessing the scientific soundness of activities relating to three Gas to Power - Powership Projects led by Karpowership SA (PTY) Ltd. The proposed project locations include: (1) Port of Ngqura (on the Southeastern side of South Africa), (2) Richards Bay (near Durban), and (3) in Saldanha Bay (near Cape Town on the West Coast of South Africa). The projects involve the generation of electricity by means of mobile Powerships to be berthed in the marine environment. Additional components of the projects include Floating Storage Regasification Units (FSRU), gas pipelines, and a Liquid Natural GasCarrier (LNGC), which will all interact with marine ecosystems. Specifically, this report is concerned with whether the marine ecology assessments and noise impact assessments (hereafter ‘the studies’) and the associated environmental impact assessment reports (EIAs) adequately assessed the environmental impact of anthropogenic noise and vibrations associated with the proposed projects and associated activities. Noise and vibrations will be broadly addressed, with specific emphasis on suitability of the EIAs to address impacts to the marine environment. These projects collectively rely on a single technical study to predict possible noise levels emanating from the powership, repeat language and mitigation strategies, and rely on the same scientific and technical references. As such, this report will address the three independent EIAs and the associated studies collectively, noting differences in the ecology of the three regions as needed, since site specific assessments of marine noise impacts were omitted from all three EIAs and associated studies.
    [Show full text]
  • River Listening: Acoustic Ecology
    RIVER LISTENING: ACOUSTIC ECOLOGY adopts an acoustic ecology approach by exploring acoustic AND AQUATIC BIOACOUSTICS IN GLOBAL patterns from a holistic perspective that incorporates the physi- RIVER SYSTEMS cal habitat of the river ecosystem [4]. Leah Barclay, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. The scientific grounding for River Listening is led by fresh- Email: <[email protected]>. water ecologist Dr Simon Linke. Dr Linke’s pioneering work in biomonitoring and river conservation planning has been Toby Gifford, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. used by agencies and NGOs from South East Queensland to Email: <[email protected]>. the Congo and he has recently been investigating aquatic bioa- Simon Linke, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. coustics and real-time ecosystem monitoring in freshwater Email <[email protected]>. environments using passive acoustics. Dr Linke believes that classic techniques for measuring aquatic biodiversity are prob- See <mitpressjournals.org/toc/leon/51/3> for supplemental files associated lematic as they potentially injure the study organism (such as with this issue. electrofishing) and can be bias as they only provide a brief balance-unbalance 2015–2016, part 2 Submitted: 21 October 2016 snapshot at the time of observation. He believes that passive Abstract acoustics presents a noninvasive and unexplored approach to River Listening is an interdisciplinary research project exploring the freshwater ecosystem monitoring. This theory is shared by Dr cultural and biological diversity of global river systems through Toby Gifford, the third collaborator on River Listening who is sound. The project examines the creative possibilities of accessible a music technologist and software programmer active in a wide and noninvasive recording technologies to monitor river health and engage local communities in the conservation of global river systems.
    [Show full text]
  • High Frequency Side Scan Sonar Fish Reconnaissance by Autonomous Underwater Vehicles
    Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences High Frequency Side Scan Sonar Fish Reconnaissance by Autonomous Underwater Vehicles Journal: Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Manuscript ID cjfas-2015-0301.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the Author: 15-Apr-2016 Complete List of Authors: Grothues, Thomas; Rutgers University, Marine and Coastal Sciences Newhall, Arthur; Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering Dept. Lynch, James;Draft Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering Dept. Vogel, Kaela; University of North Carolina Wilmington, Department of Marine Biology Gawarkiewicz, Glen; Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering Dept. SURVEYS < General, ACOUSTIC EQUIPMENT < General, SAMPLING < Keyword: General, REMOTE SENSING < General, PELAGIC FISH < General Note: The following files were submitted by the author for peer review, but cannot be converted to PDF. You must view these files (e.g. movies) online. bluefish_lineup.wmv tiger_shark_follow.wmv blue_runners_clip.wmv little_tunny_Sept11.mp4 GOPR01602_amberjack.mp4 GOPR01602_barracuda.mp4 https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjfas-pubs Page 1 of 58 Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1 High Frequency Side Scan Sonar Fish Reconnaissance by Autonomous Underwater Vehicles 2 3 Thomas M. Grothues 4 Rutgers University Marine Field Station, 800 c/o 132 Great Bay Blvd., Tuckerton, NJ 08087 5 6 Arthur E. Newhall 7 Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering Dept. 8 266 Woods Hole Rd., MS# 11, Woods Hole, MA 02543-1050 9 10 James F. Lynch 11 Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, AppliedDraft Ocean Physics and Engineering Dept. 12 266 Woods Hole Rd., MS# 11, Woods Hole, MA 02543-1050 13 14 Kaela S.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Region Marine Mammal Stranding Network Spring Summer
    Alaska Region Marine Mammal Stranding Network Spring/Summer 2019 Newsletter NMFS Stranding Hotline: 1-877-925-7333 In this issue: NMFS Stranding Program Page 2: Greetings from the Contacts Coordinator Page 3 & 4: Glacier Bay & Icy Barbara Mahoney Strait Humpback Whale Acting Stranding Coordinator (SCAK, WAK, Arctic) Population Monitoring: 2018 907-271-3448, [email protected] Update Sadie Wright Page 5 & 6: News from the Assistant Stranding Coordinator (SEAK, GOA) North Acting Large Whale Coordinator (Nov - August, 2019) Page 6:Ocean Guardian 907-586-7630, [email protected] School Aleria Jensen Page 8 & 9: Wilderness Large Whale Entanglement Coordinator Medicine & Entanglement 907-586-7248, [email protected] Response Kim Raum-Suryan Page 10 – 12: A Whale of a Pinniped Entanglement Coordinator Question 907-586-7424, [email protected] Page 13: The Parts Guy Kate Savage Health Specialist and Data Manager Page 14 - 16: A Sperm Whale 907-586-7209, [email protected] in Southeast Inside Waters Page 17: News from AVPS Dave Gann Parts Transfer Authorizations and Tracking 907-586-7285, [email protected] Page 18: News from Alaska SeaLife Center Page 19 & 20: Announcements, Updates, 1 and FYIs Greetings from the Coordinator by Barbara Mahoney, NMFS Greetings from the Stranding Coordinator Barbara Mahoney The Alaska marine mammal stranding response has a long history in Alaska, predating the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), with stranding records as far back as the 1950s. Our continued collaboration allows us to better understand the marine world as we learn from these stranding events. As we prepare for the 2019 season, we can briefly revisit the marine mammal volunteer stranding network.
    [Show full text]