DOCSLIB.ORG

DNA Metabarcoding Reveals Provisioning of Pollution-Sensitive Aquatic Insects, Resource Partitioning, and Dietary Shifts Among B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DNA Metabarcoding Reveals Provisioning of Pollution-Sensitive Aquatic Insects, Resource Partitioning, and Dietary Shifts Among B Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fall 1-1-2017 DNA metabarcoding reveals provisioning of pollution-sensitive aquatic insects, resource partitioning, and dietary shifts among breeding Neotropical migratory songbirds in a riparian habitat Brian K. Trevelline Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, Molecular Genetics Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Trevelline, B. K. (2017). DNA metabarcoding reveals provisioning of pollution-sensitive aquatic insects, resource partitioning, and dietary shifts mona g breeding Neotropical migratory songbirds in a riparian habitat (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/196 This One-year Embargo is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DNA METABARCODING REVEALS PROVISIONING OF POLLUTION-SENSITIVE AQUATIC INSECTS, RESOURCE PARTITIONING, AND DIETARY SHIFTS AMONG BREEDING NEOTROPICAL MIGRATORY SONGBIRDS IN A RIPARIAN HABITAT A Dissertation Submitted to the Bayer School of Natural and Environmental Sciences Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Brian K. Trevelline December 2017 Copyright by Brian K. Trevelline 2017 DNA METABARCODING REVEALS PROVISIONING OF POLLUTION-SENSITIVE AQUATIC INSECTS, RESOURCE PARTITIONING, AND DIETARY SHIFTS AMONG BREEDING NEOTROPICAL MIGRATORY SONGBIRDS IN A RIPARIAN HABITAT By Brian K. Trevelline Approved September 7th, 2017 ________________________________ ________________________________ Dr. Brady A. Porter Dr. Jan E. Janecka Associate Professor of Biological Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences Sciences (Committee Member) (Committee Chair) ________________________________ ________________________________ Dr. David J. Lampe Dr. Steven C. Latta Professor of Biology of Biological Director, National Aviary Department of Sciences Conservation and Field Research (Committee Member) (External Committee Member) ________________________________ ________________________________ Dr. Philip P. Reeder Dr. Joseph R. McCormick Dean, Bayer School of Natural and Associate Professor of Biological Environmental Sciences Sciences (Department Chair) iii ABSTRACT DNA METABARCODING REVEALS PROVISIONING OF POLLUTION-SENSITIVE AQUATIC INSECTS, RESOURCE PARTITIONING, AND DIETARY SHIFTS AMONG BREEDING NEOTROPICAL MIGRATORY SONGBIRDS IN A RIPARIAN HABITAT By Brian K. Trevelline December 2017 Dissertation supervised by Dr. Brady A. Porter Elucidating the diet of Neotropical migratory birds is essential to our understanding of their ecology and to their long-term conservation. Beyond broad taxonomic or morphological categories, however, the diet of Neotropical migrants is poorly documented. Using the molecular techniques of DNA barcoding and next-generation sequencing, we elucidated the diet of Neotropical migratory songbirds breeding in the riparian zones of headwater Appalachian streams. This approach resulted in a genus- or species-level description of diets that improved the current understanding of how songbirds utilize aquatic prey resources in riparian habitats. Furthermore, our approach revealed that breeding songbirds partition prey resources within a shared riparian habitat. Despite substantial differences in foraging strategy, we provide evidence that syntopic riparian species opportunistically prey upon pollution-sensitive emergent aquatic insects, thus emphasizing the importance of aquatic resource subsidies for songbirds breeding in riparian habitats. For the stream-dependent Louisiana Waterthrush, the provisioning of aquatic insects was significantly higher than other riparian songbirds. As a result, waterthrush breeding in riparian habitats with reduced availability of aquatic arthropods expanded their diet by targeting a more diverse array of insects that included significantly more terrestrial taxa. In addition to providing support for our hypothesis that Louisiana Waterthrush compensate for food shortages by targeting terrestrial arthropods in degraded riparian habitats, our findings emphasize the vulnerability of Louisiana Waterthrush to anthropogenic disturbances that compromise stream quality and the availability of pollution-sensitive aquatic insects. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee members—Brady Porter, Steve Latta, Jan Janecka, Dave Lampe, and Tim Nuttle—for all their help and guidance. I specifically want to thank Brady, Steve, and Tim. The diversity of expertise they provided was essential to complete this project and made for the ideal mentoring team. About 25% of my time as a graduate student was spent conducting fieldwork at Powdermill Nature Reserve. Thanks to all the staff at PNR that accommodated our research team and facilitated our project in so many ways. I would specifically like to thank John Wenzel and Cokie Lindsay for all they did to make this project a reality. This dissertation would not have been possible without the help of numerous field and laboratory technicians over three consecutive field seasons: Eduardo Anaya, Rose Chism, Thomas Cordray, Brandon Hoenig, Andrea Kautz, Marisa Logan, Michael McFarlin, Danilo Mejia, Michael Miles, Maria Paulino, DeYanna Reed, Zachary Steffensmeier, and Youstina Seliman. I would specifically like to thank Danilo Mejia and Maria Paulino, both of whom were essential to the success of this project. This dissertation research was supported by grants from the American Ornithological Society (formerly the American Ornithologists’ Union), Carnegie Museum of Natural History, National Aviary, and National Science Foundation (DEB-1349870 to Tim Nuttle). I would like to thank the Bayer School of Natural and Environmental Sciences for supporting undergraduate field technicians through the Undergraduate Research Program (URP). I would also like to thank the Carnegie Museum of Natural History for supporting me as a research assistant through the Rea Research Fellowship and the Bayer School of Natural and Environmental Sciences for supporting for supporting me through a teaching assistantship and a research fellowship. v CONTRIBUTIONS Chapter 1: Brian K. Trevelline, Steven C. Latta, Tim Nuttle, and Brady A. Porter conceived the idea, design, and experiment (supervised research, formulated question or hypothesis); B.K.T. and Leesia C. Marshall performed the experiments (collected data, conducted the research); B.K.T. wrote the paper with edits from S.C.L., L.C.M., T.N., and B.A.P.; B.K.T. developed and designed the methods; B.K.T. analyzed the data; and S.C.L, T.N., and B.A.P. contributed substantial materials, resources, and funding. Chapter 2: B.K.T., T.N., B.A.P., and S.C.L. collectively conceived and designed this study as an extension of S.C.L.’s long-term research on Louisiana Waterthrush. B.K.T. and Brandon D. Hoenig conducted the fieldwork (with guidance from T.N., B.A.P., and S.C.L.); B.K.T. developed the field and laboratory protocols, conducted molecular work (with B.D.H.), performed statistical analyses (with Nathan L. Brouwer), and wrote the manuscript in the laboratory of B.A.P. Chapter 3: B.K.T., T.N., B.A.P., and S.C.L. collectively conceived and designed this study as an extension of S.C.L.’s long-term research on Louisiana Waterthrush. B.K.T. and B.D.H. conducted the fieldwork (with guidance from T.N., B.A.P., and S.C.L.). Aquatic macroinvertebrates were identified by Marisa Logan. Emergent EPT taxa were identified and enumerated by B.K.T. and Zachary D. Steffensmeier. B.K.T. developed the field and laboratory protocols, conducted molecular work (with B.D.H.), performed statistical analyses (with N.L.B.), and wrote the manuscript in the laboratory of B.A.P. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... v Contributions ................................................................................................................................. vi List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. ix List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. x Chapter One: Molecular analysis of nestling diet in a long-distance Neotropical migrant, the Louisiana Waterthrush (Parkesia motacilla) .................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Materials and Methods ......................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Results .................................................................................................................................. 9 1.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 15 1.5 Literature Cited .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES and PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS of SHRUB EXPANSION in WESTERN ALASKA by Molly Tankersley Mcdermott, B.A./B.S
    Arthropod communities and passerine diet: effects of shrub expansion in Western Alaska Item Type Thesis Authors McDermott, Molly Tankersley Download date 26/09/2021 06:13:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7893 ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES AND PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS OF SHRUB EXPANSION IN WESTERN ALASKA By Molly Tankersley McDermott, B.A./B.S. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks August 2017 APPROVED: Pat Doak, Committee Chair Greg Breed, Committee Member Colleen Handel, Committee Member Christa Mulder, Committee Member Kris Hundertmark, Chair Department o f Biology and Wildlife Paul Layer, Dean College o f Natural Science and Mathematics Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Across the Arctic, taller woody shrubs, particularly willow (Salix spp.), birch (Betula spp.), and alder (Alnus spp.), have been expanding rapidly onto tundra. Changes in vegetation structure can alter the physical habitat structure, thermal environment, and food available to arthropods, which play an important role in the structure and functioning of Arctic ecosystems. Not only do they provide key ecosystem services such as pollination and nutrient cycling, they are an essential food source for migratory birds. In this study I examined the relationships between the abundance, diversity, and community composition of arthropods and the height and cover of several shrub species across a tundra-shrub gradient in northwestern Alaska. To characterize nestling diet of common passerines that occupy this gradient, I used next-generation sequencing of fecal matter. Willow cover was strongly and consistently associated with abundance and biomass of arthropods and significant shifts in arthropod community composition and diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Tachinid (Diptera: Tachinidae) Parasitoid Diversity and Temporal Abundance at a Single Site in the Northeastern United States Author(S): Diego J
    Tachinid (Diptera: Tachinidae) Parasitoid Diversity and Temporal Abundance at a Single Site in the Northeastern United States Author(s): Diego J. Inclan and John O. Stireman, III Source: Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 104(2):287-296. Published By: Entomological Society of America https://doi.org/10.1603/AN10047 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1603/AN10047 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY AND BIODIVERSITY Tachinid (Diptera: Tachinidae) Parasitoid Diversity and Temporal Abundance at a Single Site in the Northeastern United States 1 DIEGO J. INCLAN AND JOHN O. STIREMAN, III Department of Biological Sciences, 3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, 235A, BH, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435 Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 104(2): 287Ð296 (2011); DOI: 10.1603/AN10047 ABSTRACT Although tachinids are one of the most diverse families of Diptera and represent the largest group of nonhymenopteran parasitoids, their local diversity and distribution patterns of most species in the family are poorly known.
    [Show full text]
  • Isoperla Bilineata (Group)
    Steven R Beaty Biological Assessment Branch North Carolina Division of Water Resources [email protected] 2 DISCLAIMER: This manual is unpublished material. The information contained herein is provisional and is intended only to provide a starting point for the identification of Isoperla within North Carolina. While many of the species treated here can be found in other eastern and southeastern states, caution is advised when attempting to identify Isoperla outside of the study area. Revised and corrected versions are likely to follow. The user assumes all risk and responsibility of taxonomic determinations made in conjunction with this manual. Recommended Citation Beaty, S. R. 2015. A morass of Isoperla nymphs (Plecoptera: Perlodidae) in North Carolina: a photographic guide to their identification. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources, Biological Assessment Branch, Raleigh. Nymphs used in this study were reared and associated at the NCDENR Biological Assessment Branch lab (BAB) unless otherwise noted. All photographs in this manual were taken by the Eric Fleek (habitus photos) and Steve Beaty (lacinial photos) unless otherwise noted. They may be used with proper credit. 3 Keys and Literature for eastern Nearctic Isoperla Nymphs Frison, T. H. 1935. The Stoneflies, or Plecoptera, of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Bulletin 20(4): 281-471. • while not containing species of isoperlids that occur in NC, it does contain valuable habitus and mouthpart illustrations of species that are similar to those found in NC (I. bilineata, I richardsoni) Frison, T. H. 1942. Studies of North American Plecoptera with special reference to the fauna of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Bulletin 22(2): 235-355.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Stoneflies (Plecoptera) with an Annotated Checklist of the Species for Pennsylvania
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 29 Number 3 - Fall 1996 Number 3 - Fall 1996 Article 2 October 1996 New Records of Stoneflies (Plecoptera) With an Annotated Checklist of the Species for Pennsylvania E. C. Masteller Behrend College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Masteller, E. C. 1996. "New Records of Stoneflies (Plecoptera) With an Annotated Checklist of the Species for Pennsylvania," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 29 (3) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol29/iss3/2 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Masteller: New Records of Stoneflies (Plecoptera) With an Annotated Checklis 1996 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOlOGIST 107 NEW RECORDS OF STONEFLIES IPLECOPTERA} WITH AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE SPECIES FOR PENNSYLVANIA E.C. Masteller1 ABSTRACT Original collections now record 134 species in nine families and 42 gen­ era. Seventeen new state records include, Allocapnia wrayi, Alloperla cau­ data, Leuctra maria, Soyedina carolinensis, Tallaperla elisa, Perlesta decipi· ens, P. placida, Neoperla catharae, N. occipitalis, N. stewarti, Cult us decisus decisus, Isoperla francesca, 1. frisoni, 1. lata,1. nana, 1. slossonae, Malirekus hastatus. Five species are removed from the list ofspecies for Pennsylvania. Surdick and Kim (1976) originally recorded 90 species of stoneflies in nine families and 32 genera from Pennsylvania. Since that time, Stark et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015)
    Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015) By Richard Henderson Research Ecologist, WI DNR Bureau of Science Services Summary This is a preliminary list of insects that are either well known, or likely, to be closely associated with Wisconsin’s original native prairie. These species are mostly dependent upon remnants of original prairie, or plantings/restorations of prairie where their hosts have been re-established (see discussion below), and thus are rarely found outside of these settings. The list also includes some species tied to native ecosystems that grade into prairie, such as savannas, sand barrens, fens, sedge meadow, and shallow marsh. The list is annotated with known host(s) of each insect, and the likelihood of its presence in the state (see key at end of list for specifics). This working list is a byproduct of a prairie invertebrate study I coordinated from1995-2005 that covered 6 Midwestern states and included 14 cooperators. The project surveyed insects on prairie remnants and investigated the effects of fire on those insects. It was funded in part by a series of grants from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. So far, the list has 475 species. However, this is a partial list at best, representing approximately only ¼ of the prairie-specialist insects likely present in the region (see discussion below). Significant input to this list is needed, as there are major taxa groups missing or greatly under represented. Such absence is not necessarily due to few or no prairie-specialists in those groups, but due more to lack of knowledge about life histories (at least published knowledge), unsettled taxonomy, and lack of taxonomic specialists currently working in those groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana Waterthrush (Parkesia Motacilla) Christopher N
    Louisiana Waterthrush (Parkesia motacilla) Christopher N. Hull Keweenaw Co., MI 4/6/2008 © Mike Shupe (Click to view a comparison of Atlas I to II) This fascinating southern waterthrush sings its loud, clear, distinctive song over the sound of The species is considered area-sensitive babbling brooks as far north as eastern (Cutright 2006), and large, continuous tracts of Nebraska, lower Michigan, southern Ontario, mature forest, tens to hundreds of acres in size, and New England, and as far south as eastern are required (Eaton 1958, Eaton 1988, Peterjohn Texas, central Louisiana, and northern Florida. and Rice 1991, Robinson 1995, Kleen 2004, It winters from Mexico and southern Florida Cutright 2006, McCracken 2007, Rosenberg south to Central America, northern South 2008). Territories are linear, following America, and the West Indies. (AOU 1983, continuously-forested stream habitat, and range Robinson 1995). 188-1,200 m in length (Eaton 1958, Craig 1981, Robinson 1990, Robinson 1995). Hubbard (1971) suggested that the Louisiana Waterthrush evolved while isolated in the Distribution southern Appalachians during an interglacial Using the newer findings above, which were period of the Pleistocene. It prefers lotic derived using modern knowledge and (flowing-water) upland deciduous forest techniques, the "logical imperative" approach of habitats, for which it exhibits a degree of Brewer (1991) would lead us to predict that the morphological and behavioral specialization Louisiana would have been historically (Barrows 1912, Bent 1953, Craig 1984, Craig distributed throughout the SLP to the tension 1985, Craig 1987). Specifically, the Louisiana zone, and likely beyond somewhat, in suitable Waterthrush avoids moderate and large streams, habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoogeography of the Holarctic Species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): Importance of the Bering Ian Refuge
    © Entomologica Fennica. 8.XI.l991 Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Bering ian refuge Kauri Mikkola, J, D. Lafontaine & V. S. Kononenko Mikkola, K., Lafontaine, J.D. & Kononenko, V. S. 1991 : Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Beringian refuge. - En to mol. Fennica 2: 157- 173. As a result of published and unpublished revisionary work, literature compi­ lation and expeditions to the Beringian area, 98 species of the Noctuidae are listed as Holarctic and grouped according to their taxonomic and distributional history. Of the 44 species considered to be "naturall y" Holarctic before this study, 27 (61 %) are confirmed as Holarctic; 16 species are added on account of range extensions and 29 because of changes in their taxonomic status; 17 taxa are deleted from the Holarctic list. This brings the total of the group to 72 species. Thirteen species are considered to be introduced by man from Europe, a further eight to have been transported by man in the subtropical areas, and five migrant species, three of them of Neotropical origin, may have been assisted by man. The m~jority of the "naturally" Holarctic species are associated with tundra habitats. The species of dry tundra are frequently endemic to Beringia. In the taiga zone, most Holarctic connections consist of Palaearctic/ Nearctic species pairs. The proportion ofHolarctic species decreases from 100 % in the High Arctic to between 40 and 75 % in Beringia and the northern taiga zone, and from between 10 and 20 % in Newfoundland and Finland to between 2 and 4 % in southern Ontario, Central Europe, Spain and Primorye.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 1 Table 1. Current Taxonomic Keys and the Level of Taxonomy Routinely U
    Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Table 1. Current taxonomic keys and the level of taxonomy routinely used by the Ohio EPA in streams and rivers for various macroinvertebrate taxonomic classifications. Genera that are reasonably considered to be monotypic in Ohio are also listed. Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Species Pennak 1989, Thorp & Rogers 2016 Porifera If no gemmules are present identify to family (Spongillidae). Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Cnidaria monotypic genera: Cordylophora caspia and Craspedacusta sowerbii Platyhelminthes Class (Turbellaria) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nemertea Phylum (Nemertea) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Phylum (Nematomorpha) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nematomorpha Paragordius varius monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Ectoprocta monotypic genera: Cristatella mucedo, Hyalinella punctata, Lophopodella carteri, Paludicella articulata, Pectinatella magnifica, Pottsiella erecta Entoprocta Urnatella gracilis monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Polychaeta Class (Polychaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Annelida Oligochaeta Subclass (Oligochaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Hirudinida Species Klemm 1982, Klemm et al. 2015 Anostraca Species Thorp & Rogers 2016 Species (Lynceus Laevicaudata Thorp & Rogers 2016 brachyurus) Spinicaudata Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Williams 1972, Thorp & Rogers Isopoda Genus 2016 Holsinger 1972, Thorp & Rogers Amphipoda Genus 2016 Gammaridae: Gammarus Species Holsinger 1972 Crustacea monotypic genera: Apocorophium lacustre, Echinogammarus ischnus, Synurella dentata Species (Taphromysis Mysida Thorp & Rogers 2016 louisianae) Crocker & Barr 1968; Jezerinac 1993, 1995; Jezerinac & Thoma 1984; Taylor 2000; Thoma et al. Cambaridae Species 2005; Thoma & Stocker 2009; Crandall & De Grave 2017; Glon et al. 2018 Species (Palaemon Pennak 1989, Palaemonidae kadiakensis) Thorp & Rogers 2016 1 Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Informal grouping of the Arachnida Hydrachnidia Smith 2001 water mites Genus Morse et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology, Morphology, and Behavior in the New World Wood Warblers
    Ecology, Morphology, and Behavior in the New World Wood Warblers A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Brandan L. Gray August 2019 © 2019 Brandan L. Gray. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Ecology, Morphology, and Behavior in the New World Wood Warblers by BRANDAN L. GRAY has been approved for the Department of Biological Sciences and the College of Arts and Sciences by Donald B. Miles Professor of Biological Sciences Florenz Plassmann Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT GRAY, BRANDAN L., Ph.D., August 2019, Biological Sciences Ecology, Morphology, and Behavior in the New World Wood Warblers Director of Dissertation: Donald B. Miles In a rapidly changing world, species are faced with habitat alteration, changing climate and weather patterns, changing community interactions, novel resources, novel dangers, and a host of other natural and anthropogenic challenges. Conservationists endeavor to understand how changing ecology will impact local populations and local communities so efforts and funds can be allocated to those taxa/ecosystems exhibiting the greatest need. Ecological morphological and functional morphological research form the foundation of our understanding of selection-driven morphological evolution. Studies which identify and describe ecomorphological or functional morphological relationships will improve our fundamental understanding of how taxa respond to ecological selective pressures and will improve our ability to identify and conserve those aspects of nature unable to cope with rapid change. The New World wood warblers (family Parulidae) exhibit extensive taxonomic, behavioral, ecological, and morphological variation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sistemática Y Ecología De Las Hormigas Predadoras (Formicidae: Ponerinae) De La Argentina
    UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales Sistemática y ecología de las hormigas predadoras (Formicidae: Ponerinae) de la Argentina Tesis presentada para optar al título de Doctor de la Universidad de Buenos Aires en el área CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS PRISCILA ELENA HANISCH Directores de tesis: Dr. Andrew Suarez y Dr. Pablo L. Tubaro Consejero de estudios: Dr. Daniel Roccatagliata Lugar de trabajo: División de Ornitología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” Buenos Aires, Marzo 2018 Fecha de defensa: 27 de Marzo de 2018 Sistemática y ecología de las hormigas predadoras (Formicidae: Ponerinae) de la Argentina Resumen Las hormigas son uno de los grupos de insectos más abundantes en los ecosistemas terrestres, siendo sus actividades, muy importantes para el ecosistema. En esta tesis se estudiaron de forma integral la sistemática y ecología de una subfamilia de hormigas, las ponerinas. Esta subfamilia predomina en regiones tropicales y neotropicales, estando presente en Argentina desde el norte hasta la provincia de Buenos Aires. Se utilizó un enfoque integrador, combinando análisis genéticos con morfológicos para estudiar su diversidad, en combinación con estudios ecológicos y comportamentales para estudiar la dominancia, estructura de la comunidad y posición trófica de las Ponerinas. Los resultados sugieren que la diversidad es más alta de lo que se creía, tanto por que se encontraron nuevos registros durante la colecta de nuevo material, como porque nuestros análisis sugieren la presencia de especies crípticas. Adicionalmente, demostramos que en el PN Iguazú, dos ponerinas: Dinoponera australis y Pachycondyla striata son componentes dominantes en la comunidad de hormigas. Análisis de isótopos estables revelaron que la mayoría de las Ponerinas ocupan niveles tróficos altos, con excepción de algunas especies arborícolas del género Neoponera que dependerían de néctar u otros recursos vegetales.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta, Apterygota, Microcoryphia)
    Miscel.lania Zoologica 20.1 (1997) 119 The antennal basiconic sensilla and taxonomy of Machilinus Silvestri, 1904 (Insecta, Apterygota, Microcoryphia) M. J. Notario-Muñoz, C. Bach de Roca, R. Molero-Baltanás & M. Gaju-Ricart Notario-Muñoz, M. J., Bach de Roca, C., Molero-Baltanás, R. & Gaju-Ricart, M., 1997. The antennal basiconic sensilla and taxonomy of Machilinus Silvestri, 1904 (Insecta, Apterygota, Microcoryphia). Misc. ZOO~.,20.1: 119-123. The antennal basiconic sensilla and taxonomy of Machilinus Silvestri, 1904 (Insecta, Apterygota, Microcoryphia).- Some special antennal sensilla ('rosettenformige' and basiconica) of five species of Mach~fihus(Mei nertellidae): M. casasecai, M. helicopalpus, M. kleinenbergi, M. rupestris gallicus and M. spinifrontis were studied. The distribution patterns of the sensilla are different for each examined species and identical in both sexes. The sensillogram thus provides a good taxonomic characteristic for their identification. Key words: Taxonomy, Antennal sensilla, Basiconic sensilla, Machilinus. (Rebut: 8 VI1 96; Acceptació condicional: 4 XI 96; Acc. definitiva: 17 XII 96) María José Notario-Muñoz, Rafael Molero-Baltanás & Miguel Gaju-Ricart, Depto. de Biología Animal (Zoología), Univ. Córdoba, 14005 Córdoba, España (Spain).- Carmen Bach de Roca, Depto. de Biología Animal, Vegetal y Ecología, Univ. Autónoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Barcelona, España (Spain). l This work was supported by Fauna Ibérica III SEUI-DGICYT PB92-0121. O 1997 Museu de Zoologia Notario-Muñoz et al. lntroduction M. casasecai Bach, 1974, 8 88 y 2 99, Lérida (Spain) 28 V 86; M. spinifrontis Bach, The insects' antennae are provided with 1984, 4 88' y 5 99, Jaén (Spain) 11 VI1 82 specialized sensilla which function, rnainly, and 10 X 82.
    [Show full text]
  • Optioservus Riffle Beetle
    Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 2 II. SPECIES ACCOUNT......................................................................................................................... 2 A. TAXONOMY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................. 2 1. Original Description ................................................................................................................... 2 2. Taxonomic Description ............................................................................................................... 4 B. HISTORICAL AND CURRENT DISTRIBUTION ................................................................................... 5 1. Description of habitats and locations of occurrence................................................................... 5 C. POPULATION SIZES AND ABUNDANCE ............................................................................................. 8 D. REPRODUCTIVE HABITS, HABITATS, REQUIREMENTS, AND STRATEGIES..................................... 11 E. FOOD AND FEEDING REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................ 12 F. OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION AND SUMMARY ...................................................................... 12 III. OWNERSHIP OF SPECIES HABITAT BY COUNTY........................................................... 13 IV.
    [Show full text]