DOCSLIB.ORG

Smart Motorway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SCOPING OPINION Proposed M4 Junctions 3 to 12: Smart Motorway September 2014 Scoping Opinion for M4 Junctions 3 to 12: Smart Motorway CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 1 2.0 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ............................................ 4 3.0 EIA APPROACH AND TOPIC AREAS ................................... 144 4.0 OTHER INFORMATION ...................................................... 266 APPENDIX 1 – LIST OF CONSULTEES APPENDIX 2 – RESPONDENTS TO CONSULTATION AND COPIES OF REPLIES APPENDIX 3 – PRESENTATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Scoping Opinion for M4 Junctions 3 to 12: Smart Motorway EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the Scoping Opinion (the Opinion) provided by the Secretary of State in respect of the content of the Environmental Statement for the proposed M4 Junctions 3 to 12: Smart Motorway. This report sets out the Secretary of State’s opinion on the basis of the information provided in The Highways Agency’s (‘the applicant’) report entitled M4 Junctions 3 to 12: Smart Motorway Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report August 2014 (‘the Scoping Report’). The Opinion can only reflect the proposals as currently described by the applicant. The Secretary of State has consulted on the Scoping Report and the responses received have been taken into account in adopting this Opinion. The Secretary of State is satisfied that the topic areas identified in the Scoping Report encompass those matters identified in Schedule 4, Part 1, paragraph 19 of the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (as amended). The Secretary of State draws attention both to the general points and those made in respect of each of the specialist topic areas in this Opinion. The main potential issues identified are: Air Quality Landscape Nature Conservation Noise and Vibration Effects on all travellers Road Drainage and the Water Environment Combined and Cumulative Effects Matters are not scoped out unless specifically addressed and justified by the applicant, and confirmed as being scoped out by the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State notes the potential need to carry out an assessment under the Habitats Regulations1. 1 The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended) Scoping Opinion for M4 Junctions 3 to 12: Smart Motorway 1.0 INTRODUCTION Background 1.1 On 11 August 2014, the Secretary of State received the Scoping Report submitted by The Highways Agency under Regulation 8 of the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (SI 2263) (as amended) (the EIA Regulations) in order to request a scoping opinion for the proposed M4 Junctions 3 to 12: Smart Motorway (the proposed development). This Opinion is made in response to this request and should be read in conjunction with the applicant’s Scoping Report. 1.2 The applicant has formally provided notification under Regulation 6(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations that it proposes to provide an Environmental Statement (ES) in respect of the proposed development. Therefore, in accordance with Regulation 4(2) (a) of the EIA Regulations, the proposed development is determined to be EIA development. 1.3 The EIA Regulations enable an applicant, before making an application for an order granting development consent, to ask the Secretary of State to state in writing their formal opinion (a ‘scoping opinion’) on the information to be provided in the environmental statement (ES). 1.4 Before adopting a scoping opinion the Secretary of State must take into account: (a) the specific characteristics of the particular development; (b) the specific characteristics of the development of the type concerned; and (c) environmental features likely to be affected by the development’. (EIA Regulation 8 (9)) 1.5 This Opinion sets out what information the Secretary of State considers should be included in the ES for the proposed development. The Opinion has taken account of: i the EIA Regulations ii the nature and scale of the proposed development iii the nature of the receiving environment, and iv current best practice in the preparation of environmental statements. 1 Scoping Opinion for M4 Junctions 3 to 12: Smart Motorway 1.6 The Secretary of State has also taken account of the responses received from the statutory consultees (see Appendix 2 of this Opinion). The matters addressed by the applicant have been carefully considered and use has been made of professional judgement and experience in order to adopt this Opinion. It should be noted that when it comes to consider the ES, the Secretary of State will take account of relevant legislation and guidelines (as appropriate). The Secretary of State will not be precluded from requiring additional information if it is considered necessary in connection with the ES submitted with that application when considering the application for a development consent order (DCO). 1.7 This Opinion should not be construed as implying that the Secretary of State agrees with the information or comments provided by the applicant in their request for an opinion from the Secretary of State. In particular, comments from the Secretary of State in this Opinion are without prejudice to any decision taken by the Secretary of State (on submission of the application) that any development identified by the applicant is necessarily to be treated as part of a nationally significant infrastructure project (NSIP), or associated development, or development that does not require development consent. 1.8 Regulation 8(3) of the EIA Regulations states that a request for a scoping opinion must include: (a) ‘a plan sufficient to identify the land; (b) a brief description of the nature and purpose of the development and of its possible effects on the environment; and (c) such other information or representations as the person making the request may wish to provide or make’. (EIA Regulation 8 (3)) 1.9 The Secretary of State considers that this has been provided in the applicant’s Scoping Report. The Secretary of State’s Consultation 1.10 The Secretary of State has a duty under Regulation 8(6) of the EIA Regulations to consult widely before adopting a scoping opinion. A full list of the consultation bodies is provided at Appendix 1. The list has been compiled by the Secretary of State under their duty to notify the consultees in accordance with Regulation 9(1)(a). The applicant should note that whilst the Secretary of State’s list can inform their consultation, it should not be relied upon for that purpose. 2 Scoping Opinion for M4 Junctions 3 to 12: Smart Motorway 1.11 The list of respondents who replied within the statutory timeframe and whose comments have been taken into account in the preparation of this Opinion is provided at Appendix 2 along with copies of their comments, to which the applicant should refer in undertaking the EIA. 1.12 The ES submitted by the applicant should demonstrate consideration of the points raised by the consultation bodies. It is recommended that a table is provided in the ES summarising the scoping responses from the consultation bodies and how they are, or are not, addressed in the ES. 1.13 Any consultation responses received after the statutory deadline for receipt of comments will not be taken into account within this Opinion. Late responses will be forwarded to the applicant and will be made available on the Planning Inspectorate’s website. The applicant should also give due consideration to those comments in carrying out the EIA. Structure of the Document 1.14 This Opinion is structured as follows: Section 1 Introduction Section 2 The proposed development Section 3 EIA approach and topic areas Section 4 Other information. This Opinion is accompanied by the following Appendices: Appendix 1 List of consultees Appendix 2 Respondents to consultation and copies of replies Appendix 3 Presentation of the environmental statement. 3 Scoping Opinion for M4 Junctions 3 to 12: Smart Motorway 2.0 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Introduction 2.1 The following is a summary of the information on the proposed development and its site and surroundings prepared by the applicant and included in their Scoping Report. The information has not been verified and it has been assumed that the information provided reflects the existing knowledge of the proposed development and the potential receptors/resources. The Applicant’s Information Overview of the proposed development 2.2 The proposed development is for an improvement scheme for the M4 Motorway from Junction 3 (Hayes – just east of Heathrow Airport) to Junction 12 (Theale – just west of Reading) a distance of about 50km. It proposes to make permanent use of the hard shoulder as a running lane (referred to as all lane running (ALR)) to increase capacity of the motorway. The use of the hard shoulder would be continuous through junctions - this is known as Through Junction Running (TJR) - unless there are safety reasons why this cannot be achieved. 2.3 Five lane carriageways are proposed between J4 and J4b (currently four lanes) to provide sufficient capacity for traffic exiting/joining the main carriageway whilst enabling TJR at J4. Four lane carriageways and a hard shoulder are proposed between J4b and J5 (already present). 2.4 New signs and signals are proposed which would provide drivers with information regarding conditions on the motorway; lane closures; and when and where variable speed limits are in place. Description of the site and surrounding area The Application Site 2.5 The M4 motorway is the main strategic route in the south of England. It runs from London through to Wales and carries over 130,000 vehicles per day in places. 2.6 The location of the proposed development is illustrated on Inset 1: Plan of Scheme Extents of the Scoping Report. An accompanying document referred to as Figure 1, supports the Scoping Report and contains 22x A3 sheets showing the proposed development area in greater detail. 4 Scoping Opinion for M4 Junctions 3 to 12: Smart Motorway 2.7 There is no specific chapter in the Scoping Request setting out the details of the surrounding area.
Recommended publications
  • Wycombe District Local Plan Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment

    Wycombe District Local Plan Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment

    Wycombe District Local Plan Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment Report – including Appropriate Assessment January 2019 Wycombe District Local Plan– Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (January 2019) This page is left intentionally blank. 2 Wycombe District Local Plan– Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (January 2019) Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction .................................................................................. 7 HRA and other assessments .......................................................................... 7 Legislative context .......................................................................................... 7 Sites integrity .................................................................................................. 9 Chapter 2 – Methodology ............................................................................... 12 Stages of HRA .............................................................................................. 12 Scope of the Report ..................................................................................... 13 Assessment Steps ........................................................................................ 15 Chapter 3 – Special Areas of Conservation ................................................... 17 SACs assessed in this Report - Overview .................................................... 17 Site Improvement Plans ............................................................................... 19 Aston Rowant SAC ......................................................................................
  • Minutes of the 93Rd Atomic Weapons

    Minutes of the 93Rd Atomic Weapons

    OFFICIAL Minutes of the 93rd AWE Local Liaison Committee Meeting Wednesday 4th July 2018 AWE, Aldermaston Present: Haydn Clulow Director Site and Transformation AWE (Chair) Cllr Graham Bridgman West Berkshire Council Cllr Avril Burdett Tadley Town Council Cllr John Chapman Purley on Thames Parish Council Cllr Jonathan Chishick Tidmarsh with Sulham Parish Council Cllr Sophie Crawford Aldermaston Parish Cllr Debbie Fisher Wokefield Parish Council Cllr Roger Gardiner Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Cllr David Leeks Tadley Town Council Cllr Clive Littlewood Holybrook Parish Council Cllr David Livingstone Silchester Parish Council Cllr Mollie Lock Stratfield Mortimer Parish Cllr Royce Longston Burghfield Parish Council Cllr George McGarvie Pamber Parish Council Cllr Ian Montgomery Shinfield Parish Council Jeff Moss Swallowfield Parish Council Cllr Ian Morrin West Berkshire Cllr Susan Mullan Tadley Town Council Amy Palmer West Berkshire Council Cllr Barrie Patman Wokingham Borough Council Cllr Jonathan Richards Basingstoke Council Carolyn Richardson West Berkshire Council Susie Tucker AWE Nick Bolton AWE Philippa Kent AWE John Steele AWE Gemma Wilson AWE Anna Markowska AWE Scott Davis-Hearn AWE Liz Pearce AWE Michele Maidment AWE Luke Joyner AWE Graduate Adam Karasinski AWE Graduate Regulators: Gary Cook Office for Nuclear Regulation Rob Greene Environment Agency Apologies Apologies had been received from Councillors Philip Bassil, Penee Chopping, Stuart Coker, Jan Gavin, Gerald Hale, John Miller, John Robertson, David Shirt, Richard Smith and Tim Whitaker 1 OFFICIAL Actions from previous meetings Action 2/90 John Steele to present on an updated AWE Travel Plan. We will be in a position to cover this at the next meeting, Action ongoing Approval of the 92nd Meeting minutes In respect to the minutes alluding to the planning status of Aldermaston Manor the amended wording adds accuracy.
  • Borough Local Plan: Submission Version (2017) 1 Foreword

    Borough Local Plan: Submission Version (2017) 1 Foreword

    Borough Local Plan 2013 - 2033 Submission version Borough Local Plan: Submission Version (2017) 1 Foreword Foreword by Leader of the Council and the Lead Member for Planning We are delighted to present the Borough Local Plan for the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. The Borough Local Plan promotes a sustainable pattern of development for the Borough until 2033. The new development that is proposed in this plan aims to provide for new housing and affordable housing to fulfil the needs of all of our residents, whilst at the same time protecting our valued natural and built historic environment and assets. The plan aims to protect and enhance those elements that make our Borough special in the eyes of not only our residents but all those who choose to visit, work and invest in the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. We are privileged to be home to one of the most recognisable and valued historic assets in the country, Windsor Castle and the Windsor Great Park which the Borough Local Plan seeks to protect not only for our own benefit but also for future generations. The Borough Local Plan is based on a substantial and robust evidence base and on the results of the consultation exercises we have carried out in the past, as guided by national policy and legislation. We have worked with partners including our neighbouring local authorities, statutory bodies and local communities and agencies, as well as considering the many emerging and adopted Neighbourhood Development Plans being prepared by parishes and neighbourhood forums. Planning often presents difficult choices and requires a balance of national policy and local wishes.
  • Local Flood Risk Management Strategy

    Local Flood Risk Management Strategy

    Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Published in December 2014 RBWM Local Flood Risk Management Strategy December 2014 2 RBWM Local Flood Risk Management Strategy December 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART A: GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................8 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................8 1.1 The Purpose of the Strategy ...........................................................................................8 1.2 Overview of the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead ................................................9 1.3 Types of flooding ....................................................................................................... 11 1.4 Who is this Strategy aimed at? .....................................................................................12 1.5 The period covered by the Strategy ...............................................................................12 1.6 The Objectives of the Strategy ......................................................................................12 1.7 Scrutiny and Review ...................................................................................................13 2 Legislative Context ..........................................................................................................14 2.1 The Pitt Review .........................................................................................................14
  • Tidmarsh with Sulham Dates for Your Diary

    Tidmarsh with Sulham Dates for Your Diary

    Tidmarsh with Sulham Parish Magazine May/June 2009 — 50p Editorial Welcome to the May/June issue of the magazine… Firstly may I say a huge thank you to all of you who have responded so promptly and sent in your subscription payments for 2009. It has been lovely to receive so many little notes enclosed with the envelopes congratulating the editorial team on the new format magazine and thanking us for continuing to produce it — this makes all the hard work worthwhile! I would also like to thank those of you who have rounded up your payments to £5 and in some cases £10 — this helps us enormously! If you have yet to pay your subscription, which between 2 and 5 pm. As parking is tricky on the is just £3 for the year, then can I remind you main road, visitors will be asked to park at Mill that this can be popped into an envelope Corner Farm. Her garden is a fantastic addressed to me at Mill Corner Farm, Mill Lane, example of what can be achieved in a Tidmarsh, RG8 8EB (please do not mail coins as relatively small space and, of course, with a lot I had a couple of instances where I just of hard work! received an empty envelope as it had been Once again we have a bumper issue with 36 slit open and the coins removed). Alternatively pages! It is great to receive so many you can pay online to the following account or contributions covering a wide range of even set up an annual standing order.
  • Minutes of the 64Th AWE Local Liaison Committee Meeting

    Minutes of the 64Th AWE Local Liaison Committee Meeting

    MD/HCC/17/04/LA UNCLASSIFIED Minutes of the 64th AWE Local Liaison Committee Meeting Tuesday 15th March 2011 Present: Dr Andrew Jupp MD, AWE Chairman LLC Heather Young Director Environment, Safety & Health, AWE Stephen Fussey Director Site, AWE Alan Price Manager External Comms & Marketing, AWE Lindsey Appleton Public Affairs Manager, AWE Secretary LLC Cllr Philip Bassil Brimpton Parish Council Cllr Michael Bound Basingstoke & Deane Council Cllr Jonathan Chishick Tidmarsh with Sulham Parish Council Cllr Geoff Findlay West Berkshire Council Cllr Patricia Garrett Baughurst Parish Council Cllr Kay Lacey Pangbourne Parish Council Cllr David Leeks Tadley Town Council Ian Lindsay Wasing Parish Council Cllr Royce Longton West Berkshire Council Cllr George McGarvie Pamber Parish Council Jeff Moss Swallowfield Parish Council Cllr Irene Neill West Berkshire Council Carolyn Richardson West Berkshire Council Cllr Graham Round Basingstoke & Deane Council Cllr Chris Souden Sulhamstead Parish Council Cllr Marilyn Tucker Basingstoke & Deane Cllr Tim Whitaker Mapledurham Parish Council Cllr Jenny Williams Silchester Parish Council Cllr David Wood Theale Parish Council Regulators: Stuart Parr Environment Agency John Lindsay Nuclear Installations Inspectorate Steve Bithall Nuclear Installations Inspectorate Introduction Dr Jupp welcomed members to the 64th meeting. Apologies Apologies had been received from Cllr Mike Broad, Cllr Valerie Frost, Cllr John Heggadon, Tom Payne, Cllr John Robertson, Cllr David Shirt and Cllr Clive Vare. Actions from the last meeting There were no actions arising from the meeting. Minutes of the 63rd Meeting The Minutes were accepted as a true record of the meeting. Chairman’s remarks – Dr Andrew Jupp, MD, AWE. Fire update The thorough investigation into the fire in an explosives facility at AWE Aldermaston last August is nearing completion and the plans for publication are being finalised.
  • Download Articles

    Download Articles

    The Birds of Berkshire Annual Report 2005 Published 2009 Berkshire Ornithological Club The Berkshire Ornithological Club (BOC) was founded as Reading Ornithological Club in 1947 to promote education and study of wild birds, their habitats and their conservation, initially in the Reading area but now on a county wide basis. It is affiliated to the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO). Membership is open to anyone interested in birds and bird-watching, beginner or expert, local patch enthusiast or international twitcher. The Club provides the following in return for a modest annual subscription: • A programme of indoor meetings with • Conservation involvement in important expert speakers on ornithological local habitats and species. BOC subjects members are involved in practical conservation work with groups such • Occasional social meetings as Friends of Lavell’s Lake, Theale • An annual photographic competition Area Bird Conservation Group and of very high standard judged by the Moor Green Lakes Group. President Gordon Langsbury FRPS • Opportunities to participate in survey • A programme of field meetings both work to help understand birds better. locally and further afield. These The surveys include a regular Garden can be for half days, whole days or Bird survey, supporting the BTO in its weekends. work and the new Berkshire 2007–11 County Atlas and avifauna. • Regular mid week bird walks in and around many of Berkshire’s • The Club runs the Birds of Berkshire and neighbouring counties’ best Conservation Fund to support local birdwatching areas. bird conservation projects. • Exclusive access to the pre-eminent site Queen Mother Reservoir (subject to permit) This annual Berkshire Bird Report is published by the Club and provided free to members.
  • Tidmarsh with Sulham Parish Plan

    Tidmarsh with Sulham Parish Plan

    Tidmarsh with Sulham Parish Plan protecting and enhancing our parish ii Tidmarsh with Sulham 1 The communities of Tidmarsh, Maidenhatch, and Foreword Sulham are situated in the North Wessex Downs Area 2 of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Introduction 4 Tidmarsh and Sulham are separate parishes with a Parish map single parish council. 5 Landscape 7 The history of Sulham and Tidmarsh 10 Profile of our parishes 12 Environment and planning 15 People and TIDMARSH MAIDENHATCH SULHAM community Tidmarsh, the largest of the Maidenhatch, a small Sulham, which is east of three communities, lies community within the Tidmarsh, is a hamlet of 19 either side of a route that Tidmarsh parish, comprises pretty cottages and historic Traffic and transport has been important to a group of houses in the buildings lying under the traders since Roman times. grounds of a converted shadow of beech woods. 23 The age and importance of manor house of the same Acknowledgements the village is reflected in name. details such as the 12th 24 century church with its Action plans Norman doorway and the local pub dating from the 13th century. Cover: Aerial photograph of Tidmarsh and Sulham taken from the west looking east. © 2008 Tidmarsh with Sulham Parish Council Parish Plan 1 Foreword by Michael Broun Chairman, Tidmarsh with Sulham Parish Council Our thanks must go to the steering and focus group members who have constructively and voluntarily engineered this parish plan over the last two years. There has been considerable and time. Other, more major actions, may consistent enthusiasm in constructing take longer. the parish plan and, after numerous meetings combined with public As the plan moves forward and targets consultations, the action plans were are achieved, it will lead to new formally adopted by the Tidmarsh with challenges where opportunities will Sulham Parish Council on 16 May 2007.
  • Environmental Report SA/SEA

    Environmental Report SA/SEA

    Central and Eastern Berkshire Authorities Joint Minerals and Waste Plan Environmental Report SA/SEA July 2020 Contents Non Technical Summary ............................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................... 26 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................... 26 1.2 The SA/SEA Process ..................................................................................................... 27 1.3 Meeting the requirements of the SEA Directive ............................................................. 30 1.4 Requirements of SA ....................................................................................................... 32 1.5 Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) ...................................................................... 32 1.6 JMWP Background ........................................................................................................ 33 1.7 JMWP Vision .................................................................................................................. 34 2. Stage A Scoping Appraisal Findings ................................................................................. 36 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 36 2.2 Task A1 Review of Plans
  • BBOWT Conservation Report 2018 for Web 0.Pdf

    BBOWT Conservation Report 2018 for Web 0.Pdf

    Berkshire Buckinghamshire Oxfordshire Conservation Report 2018 Berks, Bucks & Oxon Wildlife Trust (BBOWT) BBOWT’s impact on the biodivesity of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Debbie Lewis, Ecology Manager, Feb 2019 Acknowledgements The survey data contained within this report have been diligently collected and processed by many hundreds of volunteers, staff and contractors for more than 15 years, and we would like to express our thanks for their time, effort and dedication in collecting all this invaluable information. We would also like to thank the many and varied volunteers who help the Trust carry out conservation management on nature reserves and in the wider countryside; without their help we would be unable to make such an amazing positive difference to local wildlife. The Conservation Report was written by the Biodiversity Team with significant input (especially the case studies) from a large number of other staff whose time and assistance was crucial in being able to deliver the report. Finally but definitely not least, we would also like to thank all the Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust members, donors and grant giving bodies whose financial support makes our work possible. Special thanks go to: Colin Williams and Andy Coulson-Phillips for their work on the case studies, and to Andy Fairbairn for data processing. Other contributors include Haidrun Breith, Sam Cartwright, Simon Claybourne, Lisa Lane, Martyn Lane, Julia Lofthouse, Marcus Militello, Hilary Phillips, Kate Prudden, Neil Rowntree, Roger Stace, Giles Strother, Mark Vallance, Jude Verdon, Nicky Warden and Pim Young Cover image by David Mole 1 Contents Executive summary ……………………………………………. 3 1. Introduction…………………………………………………… 6 2.
  • Rare Plant Register

    Rare Plant Register

    1 BSBI RARE PLANT REGISTER Berkshire & South Oxfordshire V.C. 22 MICHAEL J. CRAWLEY FRS UPDATED APRIL 2005 2 Symbols and conventions The Latin binomial (from Stace, 1997) appears on the left of the first line in bold, followed by the authority in Roman font and the English Name in italics. Names on subsequent lines in Roman font are synonyms (including names that appear in Druce’s (1897) or Bowen’s (1964) Flora of Berkshire that are different from the name of the same species in Stace). At the right hand side of the first line is a set of symbols showing - status (if non-native) - growth form - flowering time - trend in abundance (if any) The status is one of three categories: if the plant arrived in Britain after the last ice age without the direct help of humans it is defined as a native, and there is no symbol in this position. If the archaeological or documentary evidence indicates that a plant was brought to Berkshire intentionally of unintentionally by people, then that species is an alien. The alien species are in two categories ● neophytes ○ archaeophytes Neophytes are aliens that were introduced by people in recent times (post-1500 by convention) and for which we typically have precise dates for their first British and first Berkshire records. Neophytes may be naturalized (forming self-replacing populations) or casual (relying on repeated introduction). Archaeophytes are naturalized aliens that were carried about by people in pre-historic times, either intentionally for their utility, or unintentionally as contaminants of crop seeds. Archaeophytes were typically classified as natives in older floras.
  • Tidmarsh with Sulham Parish Magazine

    Tidmarsh with Sulham Parish Magazine

    Tidmarsh with Sulham Parish Magazine AUTUMN 2019 Professional and Reliable A garage that really cares! We provide all garage services for your car FRE Loc E MOT Test ONLY al collect and ion delivery service IIldFREEncludes FREE retest OOpeningpening t times:imes: Mon-Fri: 7:30am - 5:30pm A very British company Email: [email protected] Web: prmotors.biz Tel: 0118 984 4889 EDITORIAl Welcome to the Autumn issue of the magazine. I am delighted that this issue is one of the biggest ever and huge thanks to everyone who has sent in contribuVions. Sadly, in this issue, we oSfer our condolences to Julia Sheppard on the sudden loss of her husband Michael. Michael was always part of the team at the village fetes and worked Virelessly behind the scenes and was a huge support to her. A real family man, Michael leaves his parents, children and new born grandson who he was able to meet just a couple of weeks before his death. SomeVimes, life is simply not fair. StarVing in this issue, we are serialising Jean Harland’s World War Two memories – they make fascinaVing reading. I have only recently got to know Jean and I just love listening to her stories. Our favoured meeVing place is The Greyhound over a glass of wine. She is amazing company and we are so lucky to have her (and her husband John) in the heart of the village – they both have a wealth of knowledge of the local history and we will be conVinuing with her WW2 memories, the history of The Greyhound pub and other interesVing features in future issues.