Book Reviews
Medieval 12,3_f13_533-553 11/20/06 7:02 PM Page 533 BOOK REVIEWS Richard Barber, The Holy Grail: Imagination and Belief. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2004. xiv, 463 pp. $27.95 (cloth); $16.95 (paper). As I write this review, Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, authors (along with Henry Lincoln) of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail (New York: Random House, 1982), are suing Dan Brown. Brown, they claim, stole the framework for the best-selling Da Vinci Code from their book. Thus far, Brown has denied the charges, emphasizing the rigor of his own independent research and his lack of familiarity with The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail. It seems likely that his story will change: at the moment, Brown’s “well-thumbed” and heavily annotated copy of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail is being examined in court (Hugh Davies, “Dan Brown and Mystery of the Well-Thumbed Paperback,” March 15, 2006; available at www.telegraph.co.uk/news). At the very least, Brown will probably have to admit that his assertions about his own research were exaggerated. The irony about Baigent and Leigh’s claims is that The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail has been dismissed as poorly researched fantasy. As Barber puts it, The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail is “a text which pro- ceeds by innuendo, not by refutable scholarly debate” (p. 310). In The Holy Grail: Imagination and Belief, Barber refers to Baigent, Leigh, and Lincoln’s book as the work of “imaginative amateurs” whose supposed history is “written in the style of a television programme” (p.
[Show full text]