DOCSLIB.ORG

Interview with Roy Welland One of a Series of Bridge Encounters by Samantha Punch

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interview with Roy Welland One of a Series of Bridge Encounters by Samantha Punch A NEW BRIDGE MAGAZINE J ANUARY 2018 Interview with Roy Welland One of a Series of Bridge Encounters by Samantha Punch 2001 Cavendish Invitational Teams combination of both, I think. Plus, it never really repeats itself. You play Tic,Tac,Toe it’s the same thing over and over again. Bridge is at the com- 2001 Reisinger Trophy plete other end of the spectrum from my perspective. 2003 European Mixed Bridge Championships What was it that hooked you in? 2003 Spingold Master Knockout Teams I have always found games interesting and challenging. I studied a lot of 2005 Cavendish Invitational Teams mathematics when I was young and I suppose the analytical element appeals 2005 Victor Mitchell Open Board-a-Match Teams to me in this and many other games. I just found this to be more appeal- 2006 Open Swiss Teams ing. !ere is a drawback in some sense that you are required to play with a 2006 Warren Buett Cup partner or in a team so you don’t always get to freely implement all of your ideas although you usually have to. 2007 ACBL Silodor Open Pairs Championship So do you mean that sometimes, because of your partner or team mate you can’t 2007 Vanderbilt National Knockout Teams really do what you would do if it was just up to you? 2013 European Open Pairs Championships I think the best example is the stylistic view. I tend to try to do whatever 2013 Vanderbilt National Knockout Teams I think is the best percentage action most of the time. Of course, that’s 2014 Jacoby Open Swiss not always the most sensible decision at that point in time. I mean, if you 2014 World Mixed Team Championships, Sanya are ahead 50 with a few boards to go, then it might not make that much 2016 Moscow Invitational Slava Cup sense to make a very aggressive pre-empt, even if it is, in isolation, the best percentage action. But, I guess, more so if you’re playing in a team, if you 2016 South American Bridge Championships come back with unusual results, which I do, they start to wonder – gee what 2016 Spingold Master Knockout Teams happened on that board? So, I guess it’s because I go about bridge a little 2016 World Bridge Games Open Pairs Championships bit dierently from a lot of people, so I am perfectly willing to take risks and assume that if I’m right two-thirds of the time, then that’s fantastic. Just to get us started, why do you play bridge? Of course, it also means that you have a result that nobody else has about OK, well I used to play a lot of dierent games and I found it to be the a third of the time for whatever reason. most challenging. Some games like Chess are a little bit more scientic in An example you gave there is the aggressive pre-empt – would you still take that terms of denitively determining a course of action in some instances, but action? bridge really has a unique combination of mathematical analysis combined Well, you shouldn’t in some situations, and in some situations you should. with a sort of a psychological element, or an element of the unknown. So I don’t let my team mates or the opinions of other people prevent me from you really have to use probability more than science. doing what I think is correct generally speaking. Not that probability isn’t a science in itself, but there’s no certainty. So most games have too much chance or too much skill. Bridge is a perfect Would you still do that if you were something like 50 up? Page 70 A NEW BRIDGE MAGAZINE J ANUARY 2018 Well then I think you should take that risk, I intentionally didn’t do that is quite unusual. on the last day in Croatia and the results were bad. Because we probably It is unusual, yes. !at’s been mentioned. Some people are adopting some didn’t need many Victory Points in the nal day to qualify for the top six, parts of the system, for example, a lot of people have started to play trans- which is one of the primary objectives really. But we thought, if we just fer responses to a one club opener and that whole style has a lot of benets get a few under our belt in the rst match it would be nice and then we and I think most people who don’t play it don’t realise what they are miss- could do whatever we want to try to win a medal. But that strategy didn’t ing. Like the ability to let either hand decide that they don’t want to be the work very well for us. I guess it’s just not our style at least for me, it’s to Declarer or the Dummy depending on the make-up of their cards. !ere play aggressively. are a lot of advantages like that. !" "#. "# How did that feel, going into that day 1 and coming out 6 Obviously 6 was When you say you’re creating uncertainty for your opponents, is that because of !" %& still great as you quali$ed, but how did that – going from 1 to 3 and then to your unusual methods or is it because of your style of play? 6"# – feel? !ere are some conventions that are intentionally designed to cause con- !at happens all the time in Swiss Teams. When you are in anything that’s fusion, like the multi for example. We don’t play multi, but there were run in a Swiss format, often you are playing the leaders in the last round, if many hands in Croatia where the strangest things happened as a result of you lose a couple of matches you are obviously going to drop several places. somebody opening a Multi and both sides attempting to play in the same We lost all three of our last matches, some of them quite badly and so, it’s major – both sides. I mean it looked so stupid! always disappointing but it’s something you get used to if you are a games player. If you play bridge all the time and it’s a knockout match every match But how do you feel if some people are a bit critical of playing unusual methods? has a loser. So you have to get used to that. I think it’s fair to say here in the US, some people are particularly anti playing something so di(erent that your opponents don’t know what is going on and But how do you get used to that? they don’t necessarily think it’s fair? By going through it enough times. I mean, in that specic example, I had Well, there are a lot of methods that are permitted so some of the methods played in the US Trials for many, many, many years hoping to earn a place that we play, I mean, we pre-empt a lot, so that causes problems for your in the Bermuda Bowl and never did. opponents. I am a big believer in the more space of your opponents you I think you said in an interview in Croatia that you are quite famous for your take up, the better o you are. You take away a lot of their options and a lot come-backs. How do you manage to come back? of their science. So we do have some conventions that we play, but we are Well, it’s the same style of playing that we have that it’s very easy for us to only permitted to play them as a defence to an unusual convention, Preci- not replicate the result of the other table. So the bidding is almost guaran- sion or something like that. So you don’t get to do that stu all the time. teed to be dierent and we also have a very aggressive style, so sometimes Technically it’s a defence, just as a convention over a No Trump is consid- we have team mates and they say well our opponents played really well. ered a defence to their 1NT opening. So those people who don’t wish to !at almost never happens to us. !at’s not to say that we don’t make mis- play against methods like that, all they have to do is play more standard takes or get caught speeding or we are more prone to accidents than some methods themselves then they won’t encounter them. !ey’ll still encounter pairs as a result of this style, but it’s also true that our opponents make a lot aggressive pre-empting, but to me that’s all a part of bridge. I think you’re more mistakes than they normally do because uncertainty is created dur- giving money away when you don’t pre-empt when you could have. ing the auction. You said at the beginning that you recognise that you play a bit di(erently from I’m afraid I don’t actually have a feel for your system but I have heard that it other players. How did that come about? Page 71 A NEW BRIDGE MAGAZINE J ANUARY 2018 Well, because I think it’s an eective style, I don’t like to give my oppo- than those who think that they understand and just play. !ere are a lot of nents a free run in the bidding without any interference, so I overcall pretty bridge players today that play the same system they played that they learned aggressively.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Things You Might Like to Know About Duplicate Bridge
    ♠♥♦♣ THINGS YOU MIGHT LIKE TO KNOW ABOUT DUPLICATE BRIDGE Prepared by MayHem Published by the UNIT 241 Board of Directors ♠♥♦♣ Welcome to Duplicate Bridge and the ACBL This booklet has been designed to serve as a reference tool for miscellaneous information about duplicate bridge and its governing organization, the ACBL. It is intended for the newer or less than seasoned duplicate bridge players. Most of these things that follow, while not perfectly obvious to new players, are old hat to experienced tournaments players. Table of Contents Part 1. Expected In-behavior (or things you need to know).........................3 Part 2. Alerts and Announcements (learn to live with them....we have!)................................................4 Part 3. Types of Regular Events a. Stratified Games (Pairs and Teams)..............................................12 b. IMP Pairs (Pairs)...........................................................................13 c. Bracketed KO’s (Teams)...............................................................15 d. Swiss Teams and BAM Teams (Teams).......................................16 e. Continuous Pairs (Side Games)......................................................17 f. Strategy: IMPs vs Matchpoints......................................................18 Part 4. Special ACBL-Wide Events (they cost more!)................................20 Part 5. Glossary of Terms (from the ACBL website)..................................25 Part 6. FAQ (with answers hopefully).........................................................40 Copyright © 2004 MayHem 2 Part 1. Expected In-Behavior Just as all kinds of competitive-type endeavors have their expected in- behavior, so does duplicate bridge. One important thing to keep in mind is that this is a competitive adventure.....as opposed to the social outing that you may be used to at your rubber bridge games. Now that is not to say that you can=t be sociable at the duplicate table. Of course you can.....and should.....just don=t carry it to extreme by talking during the auction or play.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Magee's Acol Bidding Quiz
    Number: 178 UK £3.95 Europe €5.00 October 2017 Bernard Magee’s Acol Bidding Quiz This month we are dealing with hands when, if you choose to pass, the auction will end. You are West in BRIDGEthe auctions below, playing ‘Standard Acol’ with a weak no-trump (12-14 points) and four-card majors. 1. Dealer North. Love All. 4. Dealer West. Love All. 7. Dealer North. Love All. 10. Dealer East. E/W Game. ♠ 2 ♠ A K 3 ♠ A J 10 6 5 ♠ 4 2 ♥ A K 8 7 N ♥ A 8 7 6 N ♥ 10 9 8 4 3 N ♥ K Q 3 N W E W E W E W E ♦ J 9 8 6 5 ♦ A J 2 ♦ Void ♦ 7 6 5 S S S S ♣ Q J 3 ♣ Q J 6 ♣ A 7 4 ♣ K Q J 6 5 West North East South West North East South West North East South West North East South Pass Pass Pass 1♥ 1♠ Pass Pass 1♣ 2♦1 Pass 1♥ 1♠ ? ? Pass Dbl Pass Pass 2♣ 2♠ 3♥ 3♠ ? 4♥ 4♠ Pass Pass 1Weak jump overcall ? 2. Dealer North. Love All. 5. Dealer West. Love All. 8. Dealer East. Love All. 11. Dealer North. N/S Game. ♠ 2 ♠ A K 7 6 5 ♠ A 7 6 5 4 3 ♠ 4 3 2 ♥ A J N ♥ 4 N ♥ A K 3 N ♥ A 7 6 N W E W E W E W E ♦ 8 7 2 ♦ A K 3 ♦ 2 ♦ A 8 7 6 4 S S S S ♣ K Q J 10 5 4 3 ♣ J 10 8 2 ♣ A 5 2 ♣ 7 6 West North East South West North East South West North East South West North East South Pass Pass Pass 1♠ 2♥ Pass Pass 3♦ Pass 1♣ 3♥ Dbl ? ? Pass 3♥ Pass Pass 4♥ 4♠ Pass Pass ? ? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Tt Fall 12 Web.Pub
    VOL. 53 No. 3 FALL 2012 Meet Michigan’s winning mini-Spingold squad Editor’s note: A team of five 20-something Ann Arbor players won the 0-1500 mini- Spingold KO, a multi- day limited national championship, at the summer North Ameri- can Bridge Champion- ships in Philadelphia. A month earlier, they also won the Sunday Winners of the mini-Spingold 0-1500 Swiss Teams at the KO Teams: (front) Jin Hu and Jonathan Fleischmann; (back) Max Glick, Zach- Toledo Regional. ary Scherr and Zachary Wasserman. Here are their stories: Jonathan Fleischmann ter. I'm an attorney less than a year out of law school. I'm 24 years old and live in I started playing in 1999 Bloomfield Hills with my fa- (Continued on page 22) ther, two brothers, and a sis- DON’T FORGET TO VOTE The annual election for MBA Board of Directors will be held during the last four days of the October regional. If you cannot be there on one of those days, you can still vote by complet- ing and sending in an absentee ballot. See page 5. Candi- dates’ pictures and statements appear on pages 6 and 7. Michigan Bridge Association Unit #137 2012 VINCE & JOAN REMEY MOTOR CITY REGIONAL October 8-14, 2012 Site: William Costick Center, 28600 Eleven Mile Road, Farmington Hills MI 48336 (between Inkster and Middlebelt roads) 248-473-1816 Intermediate/Newcomers Schedule (0-299 MP) Single-session Stratified Open Pairs: Tue. through Fri., 1 p.m. & 7 p.m.; Sat., 10 a.m. & 2:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • 27, 2010 Volume 83, Number 2 Daily Bulletin
    Saturday, November 27, 2010 Volume 83, Number 2 Daily Bulletin 83rd North American Bridge Championships Editors: Brent Manley and Dave Smith Thomas McAdoo Married couple take Non-LM Pairs Dianne and Roger Pryor of Madeira Smith Beach FL had two solid games to win 1938–2010 the Manfield Non-Life Master Pairs. The Tom Smith, married couple scored 58.25% and 57.04% one of the five for a combined 57.80%. In second place original “Precision were Ryan Miller, Tampa FL; Brandon Team” members Harper, Winter Park FL with 55.46%. that dominated The winners play a weak 1NT (11—14 North American high-card points) and attribute some of contests in the early their good board to their system. Seventies, died Nov. The Pryors have played together 15 in his hometown for about 30 years. Dianne, a retired of Bennington VT. homemaker, has about 100 masterpoints. As well as being Roger, a retired engineer with Bell South a top level player International, has almost 400 masterpoints. and teacher, Smith Dianne credits Roger with teaching her was a publisher, how to play. journalist, editor and club manager. The second-place pair, Miller and Roger and Dianne Pryor are winners of the Manfield Smith won the Spingold Knockout Teams in Harper, are high school students. Non-Life Master Pairs. 1970 and 1971 and Vanderbilt Knockout Teams in 1972 playing with a rotating cast of teammates that included Steve Altman, Eugene Neiger, Finals today in Open Thirty-two teams continued on page 5 and Women’s Pairs left in Baze Champions will be crowned tonight in the Nail Fung hopes Life Master Open Pairs and the Smith Life Master Senior KO Women’s Pairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Hall of Fame Takes Five
    Friday, July 24, 2009 Volume 81, Number 1 Daily Bulletin Washington, DC 81st Summer North American Bridge Championships Editors: Brent Manley and Paul Linxwiler Hall of Fame takes five Hall of Fame inductee Mark Lair, center, with Mike Passell, left, and Eddie Wold. Sportsman of the Year Peter Boyd with longtime (right) Aileen Osofsky and her son, Alan. partner Steve Robinson. If standing ovations could be converted to masterpoints, three of the five inductees at the Defenders out in top GNT flight Bridge Hall of Fame dinner on Thursday evening The District 14 team captained by Bob sixth, Bill Kent, is from Iowa. would be instant contenders for the Barry Crane Top Balderson, holding a 1-IMP lead against the They knocked out the District 9 squad 500. defending champions with 16 deals to play, won captained by Warren Spector (David Berkowitz, Time after time, members of the audience were the fourth quarter 50-9 to advance to the round of Larry Cohen, Mike Becker, Jeff Meckstroth and on their feet, applauding a sterling new class for the eight in the Grand National Teams Championship Eric Rodwell). The team was seeking a third ACBL Hall of Fame. Enjoying the accolades were: Flight. straight win in the event. • Mark Lair, many-time North American champion Five of the six team members are from All four flights of the GNT – including Flights and one of ACBL’s top players. Minnesota – Bob and Cynthia Balderson, Peggy A, B and C – will play the round of eight today. • Aileen Osofsky, ACBL Goodwill chair for nearly Kaplan, Carol Miner and Paul Meerschaert.
    [Show full text]
  • International Teachers On-Line
    International Teachers On-line International teachers are available to teach all levels of play. We teach Standard Italia (naturale 4 e 5a nobile), SAYC, the Two Over One system, Acol and Precision. - You can state your preference for which teacher you would like to work . Caitlin, founder of Bridge Forum, is an ACBL accredited teacher and author. She and Ned Downey recently co-authored the popular Standard Bidding with SAYC. As a longtime volunteer of Fifth Chair's popular SAYC team game, Caitlin received their Gold Star award in 2003. She has also beenhonored by OKbridge as "Angelfish" for her bridge ethics and etiquette. Caitlin has written articles for the ACBL's Bulletin and The Bridge Teacher as well as the American Bridge Teachers' Association ABTA Quarterly. Caitlin will be offering free classes on OKbridge with BRIDGE FORUM teacher Bill (athene) Frisby based on Standard Bidding with SAYC. For details of times and days, and to order the book, please check this website or email Caitlin at [email protected]. Ned Downey (ned-maui) is a tournament director, ACBL star teacher, and Silver Life Master with several regional titles to his credit. He is owner of the Maui Bridge Club and author of the novice text Just Plain Bridge as co-writing Standard Bidding with SAYC with Caitlin. Ned teaches regularly aboard cruise ships as well as in the Maui classroom and online. In addition to providing online individual and partnership lessons, he can be found on Swan Games Bridge (www.swangames.com) where he provides free supervised play groups on behalf of BRIDGE FORUM.
    [Show full text]
  • Skill Preferred, but Luck Is More Than Welcome Strul Takes Slim Lead In
    Saturay, December 1, 2007 Volume 80, Number 9 Daily Bulletin 80th Fall North American Bridge Championships Editors: Brent Manley and Paul Linxwiler Skill preferred, but luck Strul takes slim is more than welcome lead in Reisinger Many years ago, Allan Falk was playing in the Vanderbilt The team captained by Aubrey Strul, winners of the Mitchell Board-a-Match Knockout Teams. At one point early in the event, Falk and Teams earlier in the tournament, hold a narrow lead going into today’s semifinal his teammates found themselves pitted against a squad that sessions of the Reisinger Board-a-Match Teams. included some of the continent’s best players. Strul, a Floridian, is playing with Michael Becker, Larry Cohen, David Falk remembers the occasion so well because the Berkowitz, Chip Martel and Lew Stansby. heavily favored team bid five slams that rated to make After two qualifying sessions, they were one board clear of the Russian- better than two-thirds of the time – and each went down on a Polish foursome of Andrew Gromov – Aleksander Dubinin and Cezary Balicki – foul trump split, and each was a loss for the stars. Falk and Adam Zmudzinski. company surprised even themselves by advancing in the The field will be reduced to 14 teams for the two final sessions on Sunday. Vanderbilt. It doesn’t take much analytical skill to conclude that the major factor in the win by Falk’s team was good, old-fashioned luck. They were in the right place at Austrians leading the right time. Falk does note, by the way, that his team was good enough to win two more matches after their big upset.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Wilderness Region Urban Forest Vulnerability Assessment
    United States Department of Agriculture CHICAGO WILDERNESS REGION URBAN FOREST VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND SYNTHESIS: A Report from the Urban Forestry Climate Change Response Framework Chicago Wilderness Pilot Project Forest Service Northern Research Station General Technical Report NRS-168 April 2017 ABSTRACT The urban forest of the Chicago Wilderness region, a 7-million-acre area covering portions of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin, will face direct and indirect impacts from a changing climate over the 21st century. This assessment evaluates the vulnerability of urban trees and natural and developed landscapes within the Chicago Wilderness region to a range of future climates. We synthesized and summarized information on the contemporary landscape, provided information on past climate trends, and illustrated a range of projected future climates. We used this information to inform models of habitat suitability for trees native to the area. Projected shifts in plant hardiness and heat zones were used to understand how nonnative species and cultivars may tolerate future conditions. We also assessed the adaptability of planted and naturally occurring trees to stressors that may not be accounted for in habitat suitability models such as drought, flooding, wind damage, and air pollution. The summary of the contemporary landscape identifies major stressors currently threatening the urban forest of the Chicago Wilderness region. Major current threats to the region’s urban forest include invasive species, pests and disease, land-use change, development, and fragmentation. Observed trends in climate over the historical record from 1901 through 2011 show a temperature increase of 1 °F in the Chicago Wilderness region. Precipitation increased as well, especially during the summer.
    [Show full text]
  • BULLETIN Editorial
    THE INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE PRESS ASSOCIATION Editor: John Carruthers This Bulletin is published monthly and circulated to around 400 members of the International Bridge Press Association comprising the world’s leading journalists, authors and editors of news, books and articles about contract bridge, with an estimated readership of some 200 million people BULLETIN who enjoy the most widely played of all card games. www.ibpa.com No. 563 Year 2011 Date December 10 President: PATRICK D JOURDAIN Editorial 8 Felin Wen, Rhiwbina ACBL tournaments are noted for their ability to handle walk-up entries, even in elite Cardiff CF14 6NW, WALES UK (44) 29 2062 8839 events with hundreds of tables. Only events which require seeding of teams require [email protected] some sort of pre-tournament entry. For all other events, entries are accepted up until Chairman: game time. PER E JANNERSTEN Nevertheless, there are some areas that can be improved upon and these were evident Banergatan 15 SE-752 37 Uppsala, SWEDEN in Seattle at the Fall NABC. The first was in broadcasting the events over BBO. The main (46) 18 52 13 00 events at the Fall Nationals are the Reisinger, the Blue Ribbon Pairs (each three days in [email protected] length), the Open Teams (Board-a-Match) and the Open Pairs (each two days long). Executive Vice-President: There are also big events for seniors, juniors and women, the biggest of which is the JAN TOBIAS van CLEEFF Senior Knockout Teams. So we had ten days of top-flight competition – unfortunately, Prinsegracht 28a only three days’ worth was broadcast on BBO (semifinals, one match only, and finals of 2512 GA The Hague, NETHERLANDS the Senior KO and the third day of the Reisinger).
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 Bridge Bulletin Index
    2000 Bridge Bulletin Index ACBL BRIDGE HALL OF FAME. George Rosenkranz named Blackwood Award winner, Meyer Schleifer receives the von Zedtwitz Award C February. Hall of Fame inducts Lou Bluhm, Harry Fishbein, Charles Solomon, George Rosenkranz, Sidney Lazard, Meyer Schleifer and Ira Rubin C October. ACBL BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Highlights from the Boston Board meeting --- February. Election notice C March C May . Highlights of Cincinnati Board meeting C May. Highlights from the Anaheim meeting C October. Election results for 2000 Board C November. ACBL CHARITY FOUNDATION. 2000 Charity Committee appointees named --- February. ACBL CHARITY GAME. Winners C August. ACBL GOODWILL COMMITTEE. 2000 Appointees named --- February. ACBL HALL OF FAME. Rosenkranz wins Blackwood award; Meyer Schleifer is von Zedtwitz award winner C February. ACBL HONORARY MEMBER OF THE YEAR. Chip Martel named for 2000 --- February. ACBL INSTANT MATCHPOINT GAME. Promo C August, September. Results C December. ACBL INTERNATIONAL FUND GAME. Winners C July, November. ACBL PATRON MEMBER LIST. December. ACBL SENIOR GAME. Winners C May. ACE OF CLUBS. Winners of the 1999 contest --- April. AMERICAN BRIDGE ASSOCIATION. Schedule of upcoming national events --- monthly. ANAHEIM NABC. Promos C April --- July. Meltzer squad wins Spingold; Wei-Sender team takes Wagar; District 9 repeats win in GNT-A; District 19 wins GNT-B title; District 13 victorious in GNT-C contest; Zia, Rosenberg top LM Pairs field; Ping, Leung win Red Ribbon; Nugit squad wins Senior Swiss teams C October. Willenken, Silverstein win Fast Open Pairs; Bach and Burgess take IMP Pairs title; Mixed B-A-M winners; 199er Pairs winners; Five-way tie fir Fishbein Trophy; other NABC highlights C November.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanborns Win Mixed Pairs Glasthal Wins 10K KO
    Thursday, March 28, 2019 Volume 61, Number 7 Daily Bulletin 61st Spring North American Bridge Championships [email protected] Editors: Paul Linxwiler, Sue Munday and Chip Dombrowski Vandy top seed toppled The team led by Richard Pavlicek defeated Sanborns win Mixed Pairs the top-seeded Marty Fleisher team on Steve and Kerri Sanborn of Delray Beach Wednesday, 149–111. Playing with Pavlicek are FL won the four-session Rockwell Mixed Pairs Jim Munday, Frank Merblum and Doug Doub. by a fraction of a board over runners-up Pamela Fleisher played with Joe Grue, Chip Martel, Brad and Matthew Granovetter of Cincinnati. The Moss, Geoff Hampson and Eric Greco. Today, Sanborns, who qualified 10th in Tuesday’s Pavlicek, originally seeded 33, takes on 16 seed qualifying round, scored 64.36% in the first final Jeffrey Wolfson. session and 57.11% in the second to finish with In other upset news: Jimmy Cayne’s No. 6 3501.45 matchpoints. The Granovetters were squad fell to Jim Mahaffey’s No. 27 team 119–87, second with 3485.84 on a 103 top. while Vinita Gupta, No. 7, was sidelined by the This is the second NABC title for the No. 26 seed, Dano De Falco, 153–108. Pierre Sanborns as a pair. They won the NABC+ Mixed continued on page 7 Swiss Teams in 2015. It is the second NABC title Conventional tunes continued on page 5 By Bob Levey Winners of the Rockwell Mixed Pairs, Steve Rock and roll came of age when I did. It’s and Kerri Sanborn. still my preferred sing-along playlist in the shower, the car, the subway, wherever a back beat and a four-part ooh-wah are needed to boost my Glasthal wins 10K KO mood and my blood pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Results from the Red Bull World Bridge Series Results Tables Medal
    The results from the Red Bull World Bridge Series Sanya, China 10th – 25th October 2014 Results Tables Mixed Teams – 89 teams Mixed Pairs – 130 pairs Open Teams – 123 teams Women’s Teams - 26 teams Senior Teams – 22 teams Open Pairs – 200 pairs (excluding drop-ins) Women’s Pairs – 46 pairs (excluding drop-ins) Senior pairs - 33 pairs (excluding drop-ins) Side event: 1 day Swiss Teams – 42 teams Medal Table Gold Silver Bronze Total China 1.5 3 2 6.50 USA 1.33 2.5 2,33 6.16 Poland 1.33 1 1.33 3.67 Indonesia 1 2 3.00 France 0.33 1.92 2.25 Netherlands 0.5 0.5 0,33 1.33 England 0.5 0.75 1.25 Israel 1 1.00 Monaco 1 1.00 Germany 0.33 0.4 0.73 Sweden 0.4 0.40 Canada 0.33 0.33 Argentina 0,2 0.20 Turkey 0.17 0.17 Total 8 8 12 28 (medals won by transnational teams or pairs are divided between the nationalities — two bronze medals in each of the team tournaments) Roll Of Honour, World Championship Events Mixed Teams Gold: Salvo : Anita Sinclair (Captain, England), Sabine Auken, Roy Welland (Germany), Zia Mahmood (USA), Marion Michielsen (Netherlands), Nafiz Zorlu (Turkey) Silver: Geely Automobile : Gui Shen Yue (captain), Dai Jianming, Wang Hongli, Wang Liping, Yang Lixin, Zhang Yu (China), Wang Wen Fei (coach) Bronze : Rossard : Martine Rossard (Captain), Danielle Avon, Jean-Michel Voldoire, Jerzy Romanowski (France), Grazyna Brewiak, Wojciech Gawel (Poland) Bronze : SAIC : Hu Mao Yuan, Liu Yi Qian, Wang Weimin, Wang Wen Fei, Zhou Yong Mei, Zhuang Zejun (China), Huang Rong (NPC), Hu Jihong (coach) Additional information: Sabine Auken and Zia Mahmoud also won gold in the mixed teams in 2004.
    [Show full text]