Recent Criminal Cases

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Recent Criminal Cases Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 30 Article 12 Issue 1 May-June Summer 1939 Recent Criminal Cases Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Recent Criminal Cases, 30 Am. Inst. Crim. L. & Criminology 130 (1939-1940) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. RECENT CRIMINAL CASES Edited by the LEGAL PUBLICATIONS BOARD or- NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW OLIVER M. TOWNSEND, Case Editor COOLING TIME - A DESIRABLE reasonable man is the case of Peo- TEST.- [Kentucky] The strict in- ple v. Ashland, 20 Cal. App. 168, structions and rulings of the courts 128 Pac. 798 (1912), wherein a con- on the element of "cooling time" viction for murder was affirmed in cases of homicide induced by against a defendant who, informed adequate provocation have resulted by his wife that she had twice com- in many unduly severe and unjust mitted adultery with deceased, the punishments. Most courts say that first time under violence, searched no matter how grievous the provo- for deceased and shot him seven- cation may have been, if there was teen hours after he had been first time for a reasonable man to cool informed, a sufficient time to cool his passion the offense is murder; said the court. Another court in whether or not the passion actually Commonwealth v. Moore, 2 Pa. 502 did subside is immaterial. Nevada (1864), held that where the de- v. Hall, 9 Nev. 58 (1893); Nowacryk fendant's wife confessed a few v. People, 139 Ill. 336, 28 N. E. 961 hours before the homicide that she (1891); Ragland v. State, 125 Ala. had committed adultery with de- 12, 27 So. 983 (1900); In Re Far- ceased, there was no ground for ley, 3 Okla. Crim. 719, 101 Pac. 295 holding" that the offense was man- (1910); Holcomb v. State, 103 Tex. slaughter rather than murder. Crim. Rep. 348, 281 S. W. 204 There had been ample time for re- (1926). flection after the defendant learned The legislatures have realized of the adultery An extreme case that a man greatly agitated and is Collins v. Florida,88 Fla. 578, 102 excited by a grave provocation, So. 880 (1924), where the deceased may attempt to "take the law into made several improper proposals his own hands," and have felt that to defendant's wife. To get away in the name of justice a less severe from him defendant and wife punishment than that for murder moved eighteen miles away. Fin- should be provided. Voluntary ally, deceased visited the home of manslaughter statutes have been defendant, forced the wife into his the result. The courts, however, car, drugged her and had inter- appear to have unnecessarily lim- course with her. Upon learning of ited this legislative intent. this incident, defendant searched Exemplary of the majority ruling for deceased and killed him, several limiting cooling time to that of a hours later. The court, although [130] RECENT CRIMINAL CASES not disturbing the jury verdict of the Court were striving for-a less manslaughter, said, ". but in severe punishment. such case the slayer cannot take The Court in State v. Holmes, time and deliberate upon the 12 Wash. 169, 40 Pac. 735 (1895), wrong, and then act upon an im- also applied the majority rule with pulse to avenge the insult by taking a great deal of hesitation. The de- the life of the wrongdoer." fendant, a weak colored boy was assaulted in a most brutal and In the recent case of Golden v. cowardly manner by the deceased, Commonwealth, ... Ky...., 121 S. a large powerful white man, who W. (2d) 21 (1938), it did not occur bragged that he intended to have a to the defense attorney to request, "nigger" before the day was over. or to the trial court to give, an in- As soon as the defendant was able struction on voluntary manslaugh- to break away from the deceased, ter, this failure to do so probably he procured a gun and returned being the result of the previous and shot him. The elapsed time strict interpretations of "cooling between the beating and defend- time." ant's return was from ten to fifteen In that case the defendant was minutes. found guilty of murder in the first The Court said "this is a hard degree. A trifle more than a year case and the condition of the de- previous to the killing, the de- fendant is touching; and whether ceased's brother had seduced and or not, if this court had sat as gotten with child the appellant's jurors in this case, we would have fifteen year old daughter. The af- felt justified in returning a verdict ternoon before the homicide the of murder in the first degree is deceased, while returning the bas- questionable . ." The Court tard child to the home of its then went on to say, that the case mother, wilfully made an indecent having been submitted to the jury exposure of his person before the under proper instructions, and it women in the house. Defendant's being a close question under the efforts to stop such conduct re- facts, they would not disturb the sulted only in jeering replies and verdict. The trial court had in- oaths from the deceased. Appellant structed the jury not to consider was so greatly excited over the de- whether the defendant did cool his ceased's utter contempt for the passions but whether he had time women of his family that he was to cool them. unable to sleep most of that night. A much more satisfying and just The next morning he shot deceased. result was reached by the Mis- The Kentucky Court of Appeals souri Supreme Court in the case of expressed its dissatisfaction with State v. Gruggin, 147 Mo. 39, 47 S. the heavy penalty meted out, but W. 1058 (1898), by applying a lib- found itself handcuffed so it could eral interpretation of the "cooling do nothing else but affirm. Evi- time" factor. In this case the de- dently the court believed that this fendant was informed at nine was not a place for an instruction o'clock in the morning that his on voluntary manslaughter al- young daughter had been raped by though a conviction on that offense the deceased, about a month pre- would have been the answer to viously. The defendant was deeply what both the defense attorney and affected by this incident, and at 132 RECENT CRIMINAL CASES three o'clock that afternoon shot offender by virtue of a prior con- the deceased. The trial judge viction in a United States District charged the jury that they should court in New York for uttering a find the defendant guilty of mur- counterfeit federal reserve bank der, there being sufficient cooling note. The state court held that time. The Supreme Court re- the burglary was his second crime versed, saying a manslaughter because his first offense, uttering a charge should have been given. counterfeit bill, was punishable un- Wharton in his treatise on crim- der a state statute also. People v. inal law (12 ed., Sec. 609) succinct- Fury, 18 N. E. (2d) 650, (N. Y., ly states the more desirable view. 1939). "Whether there has been cool- The habitual offender statute ing time is eminently a question of under which the defendant was fact, varying with the particular sentenced, states that, "A person, case and the condition of the party. who, after having been once or There are some provocations twice convicted within this state, which, with persons of even tem- of a felony, of an attempt to com- perament, lose their power in a few mit a felony, or, under the laws of moments; while there are others any other state, government, or which rankle in the breast for days country, of a crime which, if com- and even weeks, producing tempo- mitted within this state, would be rary insanity. Men's tempera- a felony, commits any felony, ments, also, vary greatly as to the within this state, is punishable up- duration of hot blood; and it must on conviction of such second or be remembered that we must de- third offense, as follows.. ." (ital- termine the question of malice in ics supplied). N. Y. CoNsoL. LAws each case, not by the standard of (Baldwin, 1938), PENAL LAW, sec. an ideal "reasonable man," but by 881. that of the party- to whom the This statute is representative of malice is imputed. Hence, whether. the ambiguity which exists in the there has been cooling time, so as habitual offender statute of many to impute to the defendant malice, states. (CoLo. STAT. ANN. (Michie, is to be decided not by an absolute 1935) c. 550, see. 551, MINN. STAT. rule, but by the conditions of each (Mason, 1927) see. 9931-1, ORE. case." CODE ANN. (1930) sec. 13-2801, Surely, the view as expressed by UTAH REV. STAT. ANN. (1933) sec. Wharton and applied in State v. 103-1-18) "Within this state," may Gruggin (supra) is much more in- be taken to mean, within the state telligent and better serves the ends boundaries, as opposed to, within of justice than does the view ap- the jurisdiction of the state courts. plied in the majority of the cases.
Recommended publications
  • Legal Methods for the Suppression of Organized Crime (A Symposium) Arthur Buller
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 48 | Issue 4 Article 8 1958 Legal Methods for the Suppression of Organized Crime (A Symposium) Arthur Buller Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Arthur Buller, Legal Methods for the Suppression of Organized Crime (A Symposium), 48 J. Crim. L. Criminology & Police Sci. 414 (1957-1958) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. CRIMINAt LAW CASE NOTES AND COMMENTS Prepared by students of Northwestern University School of Law, under the direction of the student members of the Law School's Journal Editorial Board. Arthur Buller, Editor-in-Chief Arthur Rollin, Associate Editor Marvin Aspen Jay Oliff Malcolm Gaynor Louis Sunderland Ronald Mora Howard Sweig LEGAL METHODS FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF ORGANIZED CRIME (A SYMPOSIUM) Organized crime is a vital problem in the "The Use of Equitable Devices to Suppress field of law enforcement. Because of the nature Organized Crime", will consider the mechanics of its various forms of activity, the suppression and availability of the use of the injunction and of organized crime presents difficulties not other equitable remedies where the usual legal ordinarily encountered in other areas of criminal remedies have proved inadequate. The fifth and conduct. In this and subsequent issues of the concluding paper, "Indirect Control of Organized Journal, a series of articles will examine these Crime Through Liquor License Revocation", will problems and the legal remedies available for examine this tactic as a substitute for direct their solution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death Penalty in Louisiana
    Diminishing All of Us: The Death Penalty in Louisiana Death Chamber, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola Photo Courtesy of Richard Ross, Architecture of Authority (Aperture Press, 2007) A Study for Louisiana Catholics Committed to Repeal of the Death Penalty Co-authors: Alex Mikulich & Sophie Cull ©Copyright 2012 Jesuit Social Research Institute Loyola University New Orleans LouisianaLong.indd 1 3/20/12 4:42 PM Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Executive Summary and Major Findings 4 III. Catholic Social Teaching and the Death Penalty 6 A. Louisiana Catholic Bishops on the Death Penalty 6 B. Roman Catholic Theological and Moral Teaching 7 C. Roman Catholic Social Teaching and Social Sin 8 D. The Death Penalty: A Profound Forgetfulness of Eucharistic Remembering 10 IV. The Death Penalty in Context 12 A. The US Death Penalty in the International Context 12 B. The Search for “Humane” Executions: Lethal Injection 12 C. The Movement toward Repeal 13 D. The Death Penalty: Louisiana’s Response to Lynching 13 V. Arbitrary, Inaccurate and Unfair 15 A. Exonerees 15 B. Murder Victims and their Families 16 C. The Condemned 20 Louisiana’s death row is overrepresented by individuals with childhood trauma 22 Many individuals on Louisiana’s death row were under 21 when they were arrested 23 Louisiana’s death row is overrepresented by individuals with intellectual disabilities 24 Louisiana’s death row is overrepresented by individuals with mental illness 25 D. Jurors 27 VI. Weighing the Costs: Alternatives to the Death Penalty 30 A. Cost of Louisiana’s Death Penalty 30 B. Our Misplaced Policy Priorities 31 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Liability As Administrative Law
    Personal Liability as Administrative Law David Zaring* Abstract Administrative law has almost exclusively concerned itself with lawsuits against agencies as collective entities, under the auspices of the Administrative Procedure Act. In light of the growing number and prominence of suits by war on terror plaintiffs against senior government officials, this Article considers the use of personal liability to discipline government officials and assesses it as an alternative to traditional administrative law. It compares the civil suits to criminal prosecutions of these officials and compares both of them to less- obviously law related scandal campaigns. Personal sanctions—of which Bivens complaints are a principal example—are worth more attention. These mechanisms, and the constitutional tort in particular, are case studies of the popular inclination to decentralize government, of the value of symbolic laws, and, increasingly, of the personalization of law and politics. Solving some of the problems of personal liability, as it works today, might best be done not by enhancing the bite of the always-challenged lawsuits and prosecutions, but by making sure that the law makes it more possible for political cases to be made against government officials, rather than legal ones. Table of Contents I. Introduction .................................................................................. 314 II. Three Kinds of Bivens Actions ..................................................... 319 A. The Doctrinal Problems for Plaintiffs ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Torts: Due Process of Compensation for Crime Victims Luis Kutner
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 41 | Issue 4 Article 4 4-1-1966 Crime--Torts: Due Process of Compensation for Crime Victims Luis Kutner Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Luis Kutner, Crime--Torts: Due Process of Compensation for Crime Victims, 41 Notre Dame L. Rev. 487 (1966). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol41/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CRIME-TORTS: DUE PROCESS OF COMPENSATION FOR CRIME VICTIMS Luis Kutner* This article is concerned with the due process rights of victims of crimes to bring a civil action for damages against the government responsible for maintaining law and order, whether it is federal, state or municipal. Since criminal law is that part of social control which is enforced by public officers, what rights inure to the public when social control breaks down? Since indi- vidual freedom is limited by social control, what remedy is there when limitations on individual freedom prevent effective self-protection? One of the risks of living in society is the recurrence of criminal violence. Since it is a continuing, serious social problem - one that cannot ever be com- pletely eliminated - countless thousands of victims will suffer violence upon their person through no fault of their own. The obligation to redress the wrongs arising out of criminal violence rests upon the local government, which has a duty to furnish adequate police protection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Angola Special Civics Project, 1987-1992
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Summer 8-4-2011 Organizing for Freedom: The Angola Special Civics Project, 1987-1992 Lydia Pelot-Hobbs University of New Orleans, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Pelot-Hobbs, Lydia, "Organizing for Freedom: The Angola Special Civics Project, 1987-1992" (2011). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 349. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/349 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Organizing for Freedom: The Angola Special Civics Project, 1987-1992 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Urban Studies by Lydia Pelot-Hobbs B.A. Oberlin College 2007 August 2011 Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iv Epigraph .............................................................................................................................. v Chapter 1: Introduction ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City of New Orleans the Mayor's Criminal Justice Coordinating Council
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. - ---- ~----------------------- City of New Orleans The Mayor's Criminal Justice Coordinating Council J1AYOR ERNEST IV. lrIORIAL, Chairman 11ichael Ragneris, Vice Chairman Frank R. Serpas, .Jr., Executive Diredor -~~~~~--- - - { ... CRIME IN NEW ORLEANS: A RESOURCE BOOK 1980 Update Prepared by THE MAYOR'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL JUNE, 1981 Richard H. Brown, Chief Planner 't AUG 20 19B1 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice 79969 This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily THE MAYOR'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of COORDINATING COUNCIL Justice. Mayor Ernest N. Morial, Chairman Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been Michael Bagneris, Vice Chairman grar&r~'Yor IS Criminal ,Justice Frank R. Serpas, Jr., Executive Director Coordinating Council to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the copyright owner. " TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables, Maps, Figures £age No. Page No. Table 1- 1979 Major Crimes State vs. City 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS. ...... i 2- Major Crimes - Offenses Reported - 6 Five Year Trend. .. ., . .. ... LIST OF TABLES, MAPS, FIGURES. i i 3- 1978-1979 Major Crimes - Offenses Reported. 8 I. INTRODUCTION TO REVISED EDITION 1 4- 1979 Major Crimes - Reported Offenses by II. INTRODUCTION. ..... 2 Police District. .. .. 9 I I I. MAJOR eRIME IN NEW ORLEANS.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana Justice Reinvestment Task Force Report and Recommendations March 16, 2017
    Louisiana Justice Reinvestment Task Force Report and Recommendations March 16, 2017 Members of the Louisiana Justice Reinvestment Task Force Secretary James LeBlanc (Chair), Louisiana Department of Corrections Sheriff Mike Cazes, West Baton Rouge Senator Daniel Claitor, Louisiana State Senate Flozell Daniels, Foundation for Louisiana Public Defender James Dixon, Louisiana Public Defender Board District Attorney Bo Duhe, 16th Judicial District Chief Justice Bernette Johnson, Louisiana Supreme Court Hon. Lori Landry, 16th Judicial District Court Representative Terry Landry, Louisiana House of Representatives Representative Walt Leger, Louisiana House of Representatives Representative Sherman Mack, Louisiana House of Representatives Senator Danny Martiny, Louisiana State Senate Rev. Gene Mills, Louisiana Family Forum Hon. Laurie White, Louisiana Sentencing Commission Hon. Bonnie Jackson, 19th Judicial District Court was a former member of the Task Force The Task Force would like to honor the memory of Kevin Kane former Executive Director of The Pelican Institute for working to establish this body and for his many other contributions to criminal justice reform in Louisiana. 2 Louisiana Justice Reinvestment Task Force Report Table of Contents Members of the Louisiana Justice Reinvestment Task Force ..................................................................... 2 Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Statutes of Limitation for Prosecution of Offenses Against Children (Last Updated August 2012)
    Statutes of Limitation for Prosecution of Offenses Against Children (last updated August 2012) This compilation includes statutes that establish, toll, extend, or eliminate time limitations for charging criminal offenses relating specifically to child victims. Every statute included either specifically mentions child victims or makes reference to a statute that does. This is not a statutory compilation of all criminal statute of limitations laws. General statutes of limitations that apply to all crimes without specific reference to the age of the victim or children as a class of victims are omitted. Please feel free to contact NDAA for help in ensuring compliance with all of your jurisdiction’s applicable statutes of limitation. Table of Contents: TABLE OF CONTENTS:............................................................................................................................................... 1 ALABAMA .................................................................................................................................................................... 4 ALA. CODE § 15-3-5 (2012). Offenses having no limitation.....................................................................................4 ALASKA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 ALASKA STAT. § 12.10.010 (2012). General time limitations...................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • The Governor's Power to Remove County Officials Charles J
    Kentucky Law Journal Volume 14 | Issue 4 Article 3 1926 The Governor's Power to Remove County Officials Charles J. Turck University of Kentucky Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the State and Local Government Law Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Turck, Charles J. (1926) "The Governor's Power to Remove County Officials," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 14 : Iss. 4 , Article 3. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol14/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE GOVERNOR'S POWER TO REMOVE COUNTY OFFICIALS. On the night of January 30, 1925, a fight occurred in a pool room in the city of Hazard. The sheriff and one of his deputies went to the pool room. When they arrived the fighting had ceased, but the participants were threatening to renew it. The sheriff, who was in an intoxicated condition, dispersed the crowd by ejecting every one from the pool room. He did this in a rough and violent manner, shoving, pushing, and peremptorily ordering them out, hitting several with his pistol, kicking at one, and striking a crippled boy over the head with his pistol, producing an ugly wound. The boy at the time was a spectator, sitting on a stool, and taking no part in the difficulty.
    [Show full text]
  • Scholarworks@UNO
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of New Orleans University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses 5-18-2007 An Inhospitable Land: Anti-Italian Sentiment and Violence in Louisiana, 1891-1924 Alan Gauthreaux University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Recommended Citation Gauthreaux, Alan, "An Inhospitable Land: Anti-Italian Sentiment and Violence in Louisiana, 1891-1924" (2007). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 515. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/515 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Inhospitable Land:Anti-Italian Sentiment and Violence in Louisiana, 1891-1924 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History by Alan G. Gauthreaux B.A., University of New Orleans, 1992 May, 2007 Copyright @ 2007 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work is dedicated to my parents Richard and Evelyn Gauthreaux, whom will always be remembered in my work; my wife Lisa, without whose support I never would have succeeded, and my daughter, Mia Adeline.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Crime in Louisiana
    Release Date: May 1, 2020 2018 Crime in Louisiana Prepared by The Louisiana Statistical Analysis Center and The Louisiana Uniform Crime Reporting Program A joint project of the Louisiana Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Criminal Justice and The Louisiana Sheriff’s Association Crime in Louisiana 2018 2 | P a g e LOUISIANA UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM CRIME IN LOUISIANA 2018 A REPORT ON THE NUMBER OF OFFENSES REPORTED AND THE ARRESTS MADE BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF LOUISIANA May 1, 2020 Louisiana Commission on Law Louisiana Sheriffs’ Association Enforcement and Administration of Louisiana Incident Based Reporting Criminal Justice System P. O. Box 3133 / 602 North 5th Street 1175 Nicholson Drive Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70821-3133 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802 Office Phone: 225-342-1500 Office Phone: 225-343-8402 FAX Number: 225-342-1824 FAX Number: 225-336-0343 Crime in Louisiana 2018 3 | P a g e Table of Contents Crime in Louisiana 5 Part 1 Louisiana Synopsis of Crime Reporting Programs 11 Louisiana Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Summary 12 Louisiana Incident Based Reporting (LIBRS) Program 35 Louisiana Law Enforcement Management Information System 6 Incident Based Reporting (LEMIS IBR) System Part 2 Louisiana Metropolitan Statistical Area Offenses Analysis 73 Louisiana Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) Part 3 79 Statistics Part 4 Louisiana Hate Crime Statistics 81 Part 5 Louisiana Human Trafficking Statistics 84 Part 6 Louisiana Universities and Colleges Data 86 Part 7 Appendices 89 Crime in Louisiana 2018 4 | P a g e Purpose This publication of Crime in Louisiana is to provide the reader with the most current certified information available regarding the number of offenses reported and the number of arrests made by Louisiana law enforcement agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief for Appellant Baltimore City Police Department
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND ____________________ SEPTEMBER TERM, 2019 ____________________ MISC. NO. 6 ____________________ BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Appellants, v. IVAN POTTS, Appellee. ____________________ ON CERTIFIED QUESTION FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ____________________ APPELLANTS’ BRIEF ____________________ ANDRE M. DAVIS City Solicitor DANIEL C. BECK RACHEL SIMMONSEN Chief, Office of Police Legal Affairs MICHAEL REDMOND Co-directors, Appellate Practice Group KARA K. LYNCH JUSTIN S. CONROY BALTIMORE CITY DEPARTMENT OF LAW Chief Solicitors, Police Legal Affairs 100 N. Holliday Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202 ALEXA E. ACKERMAN (410) 396-2496 NATALIE R. AMATO [email protected] Assistant Solicitors, Police Legal Affairs Counsel for Appellants INDEX ____________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS APPELLANTS’ BRIEF Page STATEMENT OF THE CASE .......................................................................1 CERTIFIED QUESTION ...............................................................................4 STANDARD OF REVIEW .............................................................................4 STATEMENT OF FACTS ..............................................................................5 ARGUMENT ................................................................................................ 15 The Co-Conspirators’ outrageous, personally motivated, willfully criminal acts were outside the scope of their employment. ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]