DOCSLIB.ORG

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY the University Faculty

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY the University Faculty 101 Kern Graduate Building University Park, PA 16802 Phone: 814-863-0221 THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY The University Faculty Senate AGENDA Tuesday, December 3, 2019 112 Kern Graduate Building Senators are reminded to bring their PSU ID cards to swipe in a card reader to record attendance. In the event of severe weather conditions or other emergencies that would necessitate the cancellation of a Senate meeting, a communication will be posted on Penn State News at http://news.psu.edu/. A. MINUTES OF THE PRECEDING MEETING Minutes of the October 29, 2019 Meeting in The Senate Record 53:2 B. COMMUNICATIONS TO THE SENATE Senate Curriculum Report of November 12, 2019 Appendix A 2020-2021 Senate Calendar Appendix B C. REPORT OF SENATE COUNCIL - Meeting of November 12, 2019 D. ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE CHAIR E. COMMENTS BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY F. COMMENTS BY THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST OF THE UNIVERSITY SPECIAL INFORMATIONAL REPORTS Senate Committee on University Planning Budgeting at Penn State 2019-2020 Appendix C [15 minutes allocated for presentation and discussion] 2019-2020 Strategic Plan Implementation Progress Report Appendix D [15 minutes allocated for presentation and discussion] G. FORENSIC BUSINESS Senate Committee on Curricular Affairs Senate Input on One Penn State 2025’s Goal of Curricular Coherence Appendix E [20 minutes allocated for presentation and discussion] H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None I. LEGISLATIVE REPORTS Senate Committee on Committees and Rules Revisions to Senate Constitution, Article II – Membership, Section 5 Appendix F (Including World Campus Student Government Association) Revisions to Standing Rules, Article II, Section 6(o) Committee on Appendix G University Planning (Sustainability) Revisions to Senate Bylaws; Article I, Section 1: Officers Appendix H J. ADVISORY/CONSULTATIVE REPORTS Senate Committees on Faculty Affairs and Intra-University Relations Revision to AC-25 Emeritus Policy (Formerly HR25) Appendix I Senate Committee on Faculty Affairs Revision to AC-76 “Faculty Rights and Responsibilities” Appendix J Senate Committee on Libraries, Information Systems, and Technology Email Policy Appendix K K. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS Senate Committee on Curricular Affairs Mid-term report from the Task Force on Curricular Process Reform * Appendix L Senate Committees on Faculty Benefits and Joint Committee on Insurance and Benefits 2018-2019 Annual Report on the Status of Benefit Changes Appendix M [15 minutes allocated for presentation and discussion] Senate Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics Annual Report of the Senate Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics, Appendix N Academic Year, 2018-2019 (Division 1 Athletics at University Park) * Senate Committee on Libraries, Information Systems, and Technology Software License Management * Appendix O University IT Modernization Efforts Appendix P [15 minutes allocated for presentation and discussion] * No presentation of reports marked with an asterisk. L. NEW LEGISLATIVE BUSINESS None M. COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE GOOD OF THE UNIVERSITY The next meeting of the University Faculty Senate will be held on Tuesday, January 28, 2020, 1:00 p.m., Room 112 Kern Graduate Building. All members of the University Faculty Senate are asked to sit in their assigned seats for each Senate meeting. The assignment of seats is made to enable the Senate Chair to distinguish members from visitors and to be able to recognize members appropriately. Senators are reminded to wait for the microphone and identify themselves and their voting unit before speaking on the floor. Members of the University community, who are not Senators, may not speak at a Senate meeting unless they request and are granted the privilege of the floor from the Senate Chair at least five days in advance of the meeting. Appendix A 12/3/2019 101 Kern Graduate Building University Park, PA 16802 Phone: 814-863-0221 COMMUNICATION TO THE SENATE DATE: November 13, 2019 TO: Nicholas Rowland, Chair, University Faculty Senate FROM: Mary Beth Williams, Chair, Senate Committee on Curricular Affairs The Senate Curriculum Report dated November 12, 2019 has been circulated throughout the University. Objections to any of the items in the report must be submitted to Kadi Corter, Curriculum Coordinator, 101 Kern Graduate Building, 814-863-0996, [email protected], on or before December 13, 2019. The Senate Curriculum Report is available on the web and may be found at: http://senate.psu.edu/curriculum/senate-curriculum-reports/ Appendix B 12/03/19 2020-2021 Faculty Senate Calendar Senate Council Curriculum Meetings and Proposals Senate Council Curriculum Report Due Reports Due Publication Date Senate Meetings August 14, 2020 August 18, 2020 September 1, 2020 September 15, 2020 September 18, 2020 September 22, 2020 October 6, 2020 October 20, 2020 October 23, 2020 October 27, 2020 November 10, 2020 December 1, 2020 December 18, 2020 December 18, 2020 January 12, 2021 January 26, 2021 January 29, 2021 February 2, 2021 February 16, 2021 March 16, 2021 March 19, 2021 March 23, 2021 April 6, 2021 April 27, 2021 June 4, 2021 June 8, 2021 June 22, 2021* *Tentative Appendix C 12/3/19 SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNIVERSITY PLANNING Budgeting at Penn State 2019-2020 (Informational) Dr. Nicholas Jones, Executive Vice President and Provost of the University, will present information about the 2019-20 University Operating Budget and the strategic budgeting approach. SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNIVERSITY PLANNING 2019-2020 • O. Richard Bundy III • James Fairbank • David Gray • Nicholas Jones • David Lieb • John Liechty • Frantisek Marko, Vice Chair • Kathleen Mulder • Daniel Newhart • Mary Lou Ortiz • Lisa Posey, Chair • Gavin Robertson • Brian Saunders • Star Sharp • Alok Sinha • William Sitzabee • Charles Specht • Gary Thomas • Mary Vollero • Alex Wu • Robert Zambanini Appendix C 12/3/19 FY 2019-20 Budget and Strategic Budget Task Force Recommendations Informational Report Dr. Nicholas P. Jones Meeting of the University Faculty Senate Tuesday, December 3, 2019 OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST 2019-20 Operating Budget OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Appendix C 12/3/19 2019-20 Total Income: $6.8 Billion OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST 2019-20 Permanent Education and General Budget Changes OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Appendix C 12/3/19 2019-20 Permanent Education and General Budget Summary • Revenue Changes – PA resident undergraduate tuition increase = 0% – All other tuition increases = 1.95% – Change in total revenue = $35.4M • Expense Changes – Salary merit increase = 2.50% – Capital Plan funding = $9.467M operating budget debt service and $80M in direct capital funding from university contingency – No additions to facilities maintenance or student aid – Priorities and strategic investments = $9.0M – Cost savings = $35.528M, of which $9.3M are identified – Change in total expenses (including cost savings) = $35.4M OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST History of State Appropriations: 2001-02 Through 2019-20 OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Appendix C 12/3/19 2019-20 State Appropriation: Requested vs. Approved OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Big 10: Ten- and Five-Year Changes in Undergraduate Tuition OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Appendix C 12/3/19 2019-20 Undergraduate Tuition and Fee Changes PA Residents Non‐PA Residents Proposed Tuition Increases and Rates per Semester % Inc $ Inc Rate % Inc $ Inc Rate Lower Division University Park 0.00% $0 $8,708 1.95% $330 $17,240 Altoona, Berks, Erie, Harrisburg 0.00% $0 $7,107 1.95% $229 $11,962 Abington 0.00% $0 $6,770 1.95% $217 $11,364 Brandywine, Hazleton, Lehigh Valley, Schuylkill, Scranton, York, World Campus 0.00% $0 $6,742 1.95% $215 $11,237 Beaver, DuBois, Fayette, Greater Allegheny, Mont Alto, New Kensington, Wilkes‐Barre 0.00% $0 $6,359 1.95% $204 $10,655 Shenango 0.00% $0 $6,237 1.95% $200 $10,449 Undergraduate Aggregate Increase 0.00% 1.95% Student Fee changes: Student Initiated Fee: $4 at campuses, ‐$2 at UP (combination of former Activities and Facilities Fee) Information Technology Fee ‐ no increase (will be included in tuition in Spring 2020) OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST 2014-15 Through 2019-20 E&G Cost Savings and Revenue Changes OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Appendix C 12/3/19 2014-15 Through 2019-20 E&G Cost Savings and Revenue Changes OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Strategic Budgeting Approach OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Appendix C 12/3/19 Strategic Budget Task Force • Convened in January 2019 to examine the key issues related to Penn State’s budget processes and make recommendations to allow multi-year budget planning of total university revenues and expenses • Included broad representation from academic and administrative areas across the university • Submitted nine recommendations for changes in the budget approach – Overall Budgeting Approach: Multi-year planning and budgeting all funds – Operating Budget: General and non-general funds – Capital Planning: Capital plan development and the intersection of operating and capital costs OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Implementation Structure OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Appendix C 12/3/19 Executive Budget Committee Established to oversee the work to operationalize the recommendations adopted from the Strategic Budget Task Force’s report • Executive
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Modeling Language for Multi-Tenant Data Architecture Evolution in Cloud Applications
    School of Computing and Communications A Modeling Language for Multi-tenant Data Architecture Evolution in Cloud Applications Assylbek Sagitzhanuly Jumagaliyev M.Sc., International Information Technologies University, 2014 B.Sc., Suleyman Demirel University, 2011 Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 29 April 2019 Abstract Multi-tenancy enables efficient resource utilization by sharing application resources across multiple customers (i.e., tenants). Hence, applications built using this pat- tern can be o↵ered at a lower price and reduce maintenance e↵ort as less application instances and supporting cloud resources must be maintained. These properties en- courage cloud application providers to adopt multi-tenancy to their existing appli- cations, yet introducing this pattern requires significant changes in the application structure to address multi-tenancy requirements such as isolation of tenants, exten- sibility of the application, and scalability of the solution. In cloud applications, the data layer is often the prime candidate for multi-tenancy, and it usually comprises acombinationofdi↵erentcloudstoragesolutionssuchasblobstorage,relational and non-relational databases. These storage types are conceptually and tangibly di- vergent, each requiring its own partitioning schemes to meet multi-tenancy require- ments. Currently, multi-tenant data architectures are implemented using manual coding methods, at times following guidance and patterns o↵ered by cloud prov- iders. However, such manual implementation approach tends to be time consum- ing and error prone. Several modeling methods based on Model-Driven Engineer- ing (MDE) and Software Product Line Engineering (SPLE) have been proposed to capture multi-tenancy in cloud applications. These methods mainly generate cloud deployment configurations from an application model, though they do not automate implementation or evolution of applications.
    [Show full text]
  • AWS Risk and Compliance Whitepaper for Additional Details - Policy Available At
    Amazon Web Services: Risk and Compliance January 2017 (Consult http://aws.amazon.com/compliance/resources for the latest version of this paper) Amazon Web Services Risk and Compliance January 2017 This document is intended to provide information to assist AWS customers with integrating AWS into their existing control framework supporting their IT environment. This document includes a basic approach to evaluating AWS controls and provides information to assist customers with integrating control environments. This document also addresses AWS-specific information around general cloud computing compliance questions. Table of Contents Risk and Compliance Overview .......................................................................................................................3 Shared Responsibility Environment ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Strong Compliance Governance ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Evaluating and Integrating AWS Controls ...................................................................................................4 AWS IT Control Information ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 AWS Global Regions .........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Data Center Industry Overview Colby Synesael.Pdf
    INDUSTRY OVERVIEW MARCH 2019 Colby Synesael Senior Equity Research Analyst Cowen and Company 646 562 1355 [email protected] DATA CENTERS ARE PART OF COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE What Is Communications Infrastructure? • What Is Communications Infrastructure? – The idea that macro towers, data centers, optical fiber, and small cells/DAS represent one asset class whose singular purpose is the enablement of communications, and in so doing have developed business models very similar to one another, and in many cases more similar to the real estate industry than the telecom services industry. • Key attributes – Unit pricing increases over time (typically with an escalator) – Long-term contracts – High contribution margin • Think like a real estate company – Dark fiber, colocation, towers, land rights all qualify as REIT assets by the IRS – Return-oriented decision making – Value of AFFO as a metric • Scale matters – Supply chain mgmt. (i.e. cost to build) – Geographic diversity – Relatively low cost of capital Source: Cowen and Company “The Edge” Is The Next Frontier • Creating new opportunities • Fiber routes • Small cells • Data centers (more locations/smaller footprint per location) • Where the end-users of digital services reside • Compute/storage needs to occur closer to them • Tier II/III markets • Where wireless infrastructure meets wireline infrastructure Source: Cowen and Company SECTOR PERFORMANCE Strong Sector Performance Communications Infrastructure Index: 5-Year Performance (Indexed to 100 on 01/31/2014) 280 260 240 139% 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 Comm. Infra. Index Stocks: AMT, COR, CCI, CONE, DLR, EQIX, INXN, UNIT, QTS, SBAC, SWCH, ZAYO Data Center Index Stocks: COR, CONE, DLR, EQIX, INXN, QTS, SWCH Source: Thomson Reuters Strong Sector Performance Communications Infrastructure Index vs.
    [Show full text]
  • File & Servexpress
    EQUINIX CUSTOMER SUCCESS STORY FILE & SERVEXPRESS LEGAL E-Filing service provider speeds time to production, and delivers secure, high-performance connections through Equinix- Logicworks partnership Executive Overview File & ServeXpress needed to quickly integrate two disparate product lines as it launched its integrated Software as a Service (SaaS) platform for the legal industry. As a long-time Equinix customer, with infrastructure located in the company’s NY4 IBX data center, File & ServeXpress came to Equinix looking for a data center solution that included managed services. Equinix was able to tap the growing ecosystem of cloud providers across its vast network of IBX data centers to deliver a solution that included access to existing cloud customer and managed service provider, Logicworks. Its partnership with Equinix and Logicworks allowed File & ServeXpress to significantly accelerate time-to-production, enable comprehensive disaster preparedness, meet critical compliance requirements and Results provide the lowest latency connectivity to national court systems and other end-users. The combination of Logicworks and Equinix enabled File & ServeXpress to: The Customer • Accelerate time-to-production and File & ServeXpress works at the crossroads of the legal and SaaS industries to bridge launch the integrated SaaS platform the gap between intelligent e-discovery and secure document distribution to court systems on schedule, with ambitious goals for around the United States. The Irving, Texas,-based company was formed in 2012 through “go-live” production capabilities an acquisition of two pioneers of e-Filing and electronic service – CaseFileXpress and File & Serve, a former LexisNexis company. The combination of more than 30 years of • Confidently and securely host critical experience in legal e-filing and secure legal document distribution created an industry e-discovery data for its clients leading service.
    [Show full text]
  • Software, Internet & IT Infrastructure M&A Report: 2011
    PEACHTREE CAPITAL ADVISORS, INC. Software, Internet & IT Infrastructure M&A Report: 2011 Peachtree Capital Advisors, Inc. is a Pasadena, CA-based investment bank providing M&A advisory services to growth and middle market software, Internet and IT infrastructure companies both in the U.S. and abroad. With 15 years of experience, Managing Director and founder John Doyle has closed and structured over twenty-five deals and possesses a strong knowledgebase of financial and strategic buyers in these sectors. If you are interested in learning more about valuation, positioning, preparation, or the merger and acquisition process, please visit www.peachtreecapitaladvisors.com or contact John Doyle at 626-204-4047. Software, Internet & IT Infrastructure M&A Report: 2011 This report does not seek to prove that volume or the deal value of M&A has increased, primarily because that is a near impossible statistic to obtain on a congruent basis, but to discuss valuation multiples, M&A trends and transaction rationale in the Software, Internet & IT Infrastructure sectors. In this year of cautious optimism and grinding economic growth, it is safe to say that buying won in the proverbial buy versus build question. In 2010, many companies slashed costs and hoarded cash. However, in Q1 2011, the economy began to grow and growth expectations in the market elevated; as a result, equity investors favored growth companies. Faced with the decision to invest in organic growth (risky corporate finance projects or internal R&D), grow through acquisition, or distribute funds back to investors, CEOs overwhelmingly decided to make small strategic hyper-growth acquisitions of companies they were familiar with.
    [Show full text]
  • View Whitepaper
    INFRAREPORT Top M&A Trends in Infrastructure Software EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1 EVOLUTION OF CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE 7 1.1 Size of the Prize 7 1.2 The Evolution of the Infrastructure (Public) Cloud Market and Technology 7 1.2.1 Original 2006 Public Cloud - Hardware as a Service 8 1.2.2 2016 - 2010 - Platform as a Service 9 1.2.3 2016 - 2019 - Containers as a Service 10 1.2.4 Container Orchestration 11 1.2.5 Standardization of Container Orchestration 11 1.2.6 Hybrid Cloud & Multi-Cloud 12 1.2.7 Edge Computing and 5G 12 1.2.8 APIs, Cloud Components and AI 13 1.2.9 Service Mesh 14 1.2.10 Serverless 15 1.2.11 Zero Code 15 1.2.12 Cloud as a Service 16 2 STATE OF THE MARKET 18 2.1 Investment Trend Summary -Summary of Funding Activity in Cloud Infrastructure 18 3 MARKET FOCUS – TRENDS & COMPANIES 20 3.1 Cloud Providers Provide Enhanced Security, Including AI/ML and Zero Trust Security 20 3.2 Cloud Management and Cost Containment Becomes a Challenge for Customers 21 3.3 The Container Market is Just Starting to Heat Up 23 3.4 Kubernetes 24 3.5 APIs Have Become the Dominant Information Sharing Paradigm 27 3.6 DevOps is the Answer to Increasing Competition From Emerging Digital Disruptors. 30 3.7 Serverless 32 3.8 Zero Code 38 3.9 Hybrid, Multi and Edge Clouds 43 4 LARGE PUBLIC/PRIVATE ACQUIRERS 57 4.1 Amazon Web Services | Private Company Profile 57 4.2 Cloudera (NYS: CLDR) | Public Company Profile 59 4.3 Hortonworks | Private Company Profile 61 Infrastructure Software Report l Woodside Capital Partners l Confidential l October 2020 Page | 2 INFRAREPORT
    [Show full text]
  • Hype Cycle for I&O Automation, 2020
    Hype Cycle for I&O Automation, 2020 Published: 4 August 2020 ID: G00441834 Analyst(s): Chris Saunderson Automation is a catalyst that drives consistent quality and business agility as organizations adopt cloud computing and DevOps practices, and integrate AI capabilities. I&O leaders must leverage the technologies in this Hype Cycle to deliver faster value, improve efficiency and optimize costs. Table of Contents Analysis..................................................................................................................................................3 What You Need to Know.................................................................................................................. 3 The Hype Cycle................................................................................................................................ 3 The Priority Matrix.............................................................................................................................5 Off the Hype Cycle........................................................................................................................... 7 On the Rise...................................................................................................................................... 7 Chaos Engineering..................................................................................................................... 7 Hybrid Digital Infrastructure Management................................................................................... 8 SaaS
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Services
    2 — Electronic Services Summary This chapter provides an overview of two streams – the automation of activities and programming paradigms – which drove and supported the evolution of electronic services. These services are service systems implemented using important elements from the fields of automation and programming. It presents several classifications to understand the nature of services according to different views. Since services can take various forms, the chapter explains and contrasts electronic services, web services, cloud services, the internet of services, and service-oriented architectures. Learning Objectives 1. Describe the evolution of electronic services as a result of the automation of economic activities and self service. 2. Describe the evolution of electronic services as the improvement of program- ming paradigms. 3. Classify service systems based on the role of information technology, service architectures, strategies, and business models. 4. Compare the various service types and paradigms that exist: electronic services, web services, cloud services, and internet of services. Jorge Cardoso and Hansjörg Fromm 36 Electronic Services Opening Case Amazon Web Services ⌅ AMAZON EMBRACES SOAP AND REST WEB SERVICES Amazon.com is known by most people as the largest e-commerce web site which sells books and other goods. Less known is the fact that Amazon has close to 1.000.000 servers. Why so many computers? To support millions of customers, Amazon had to build a massive storage and computing infrastructure with high availability and failure resistance to operate its web store. Once the infrastructure was built, it became clear that it could be exploited as a commodity by selling services which would be billed based on their usage.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Steps for a Cost-Efficient Migration to AWS Cloud Table of Contents
    eBook 5 Steps for a Cost-efficient Migration to AWS Cloud Table of contents Getting ready to migrate to the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud? ................. 3 The migration process ............................................................................................................. 4 Step 1: Migration preparation and business planning ................................................. 5 Step 2: Portfolio discovery and planning ......................................................................... 6 Step 3: Design ...........................................................................................................................10 Step 4: Migration and validation ........................................................................................11 Step 5: Operate and optimize .............................................................................................13 Summary .....................................................................................................................................15 5 STEPS FOR A COST-EFFICIENT MIGRATION TO AWS CLOUD 2 Getting ready to migrate to the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud? Companies that are looking to modernize existing business applications often realize the best way to do so is to migrate them to the cloud. By doing so, you can improve agility, performance, and cost savings by moving all, or a key subset, of your workloads to the cloud. However, many companies struggle to develop the right staff, tools, and processes to migrate quickly and cost-efficiently.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilizing Cloud Computing Log Events for Security Automation
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Creative Components Dissertations Fall 2019 Utilizing Cloud Computing Log Events for Security Automation Khalid Farrag Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/creativecomponents Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Farrag, Khalid, "Utilizing Cloud Computing Log Events for Security Automation" (2019). Creative Components. 386. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/creativecomponents/386 This Creative Component is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Creative Components by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Utilizing Cloud Computing Log Events for Security Automation by Khalid Farrag A creative component submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Major: Information Assurance Program of Study Committee: DOUG JACOBSON, Major Professor The student author, whose presentation of the scholarship herein was approved by the program of study committee is solely responsible for the content of this dissertation. The Graduate College will ensure this creative component is globally accessible and will not permit alterations after a degree is conferred. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2019 Copyright © Khalid Farrag, 2019. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecting for HIPAA Security and Compliance on Amazon Web Services
    Architecting for HIPAA Security and Compliance on Amazon Web Services March 2017 © 2017, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Notices This document is provided for informational purposes only. It represents AWS’s current product offerings and practices as of the date of issue of this document, which are subject to change without notice. Customers are responsible for making their own independent assessment of the information in this document and any use of AWS’s products or services, each of which is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind, whether express or implied. This document does not create any warranties, representations, contractual commitments, conditions or assurances from AWS, its affiliates, suppliers or licensors. The responsibilities and liabilities of AWS to its customers are controlled by AWS agreements, and this document is not part of, nor does it modify, any agreement between AWS and its customers. Contents Introduction 1 Encryption and Protection of PHI in AWS 2 Amazon EC2 2 Amazon Elastic Block Store 4 Amazon Redshift 4 Amazon S3 5 Amazon Glacier 5 Amazon RDS for MySQL 6 Amazon RDS for Oracle 6 Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL 7 Amazon Aurora 8 Elastic Load Balancing 8 Amazon EMR 9 Amazon DynamoDB 9 Using AWS KMS for Encryption of PHI 10 AWS Snowball 10 Auditing, Back-Ups, and Disaster Recovery 11 Document Revisions 12 Abstract This paper briefly outlines how companies can use Amazon Web Services (AWS) to create HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act)- compliant applications. We will focus on the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules for protecting Protected Health Information (PHI), how to use AWS to encrypt data in transit and at rest, and how AWS features can be used to meet HIPAA requirements for auditing, back-ups, and disaster recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cloud Computing Market 2012-2017
    +44 20 8123 2220 [email protected] The Cloud Computing Market 2012-2017 https://marketpublishers.com/r/C39718FC83DEN.html Date: May 2012 Pages: 195 Price: US$ 2,633.00 (Single User License) ID: C39718FC83DEN Abstracts The drive in adoption of cloud services is the result of a number of factors and not only the potential benefits for companies. The recent economic climate has been forcing many companies to reduce spending while remaining competitive. The proliferation of high-end mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets in enterprises means that access to enterprise applications is becoming more mobile. Visiongain has determined that the value of the global cloud computing market in 2012 will reach $37.9bn. Fast internet speeds and the growing availability of mobile broadband means that many businesses will expect cloud access at all times, from any place and with any mobile internet device. Cloud computing appears as a very lucrative and commercially interesting solution for many companies. Offering powerful computing technologies at low prices means that start-ups and SMBs can compete in the same market as bigger enterprises. Visiongain believes that in the next five years the cloud computing market will continue to flourish on a global level, as an increasing number of businesses worldwide switch to cloud computing services in order to carry out everyday business related tasks. This report features a detailed view of cloud computing from the perspective of infrastructure vendors and service providers, enterprises and end users. Key supplier strategies and business models are also related in order to provide a sound basis for understanding the current market.
    [Show full text]