DOCSLIB.ORG

(A) Show That for All N = 0,1,2,..., (Βn N! )2 = 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(A) Show That for All N = 0,1,2,..., (Βn N! )2 = 1 MATH 185: COMPLEX ANALYSIS FALL 2009/10 PROBLEM SET 7 SOLUTIONS 1. Let β 2 C. (a) Show that for all n = 0; 1; 2;:::; βn 2 1 Z βneβz = n+1 dz: n! 2πi @D(0;1) n!z Solution. Applying generalized Cauchy's integral formula, we get Z n βz n " Z βz # n n n 2 1 β e β 1 e β 1 d βz β n+1 dz = n+1 dz = × n e = : 2πi @D(0;1) n!z n! 2πi @D(0;1) z n! n! dz z=0 n! (b) Show that 1 2 X βn 1 Z 2π = e2β cos θ dθ: n! 2π n=0 0 [Hint: Consider power series expansion of eβ=z and apply (a) on z−1eβ(z+1=z).] Solution. Note that 1 X βn eβ=z = : n!zn n=0 Multiplying by eβz and dividing by z, we get 1 1 X βneβz eβ(z+1=z) = : z n!zn+1 n=0 Integrating about @D(0; 1) and using (a), we get 1 " # 1 2 1 Z 1 X βn 1 Z eβz X βn eβ(z+1=z) dz = dz = 2πi z n! 2πi zn+1 n! @D(0;1) n=0 @D(0;1) n=0 iθ Evaluating the line integral about the path z : [0; 2π] ! C, z(θ) = e and noting that eiθ + e−iθ = 2 cos θ we get 1 Z 1 1 Z 2π eβ(z+1=z) dz = e2β cos θ dθ: 2πi @D(0;1) z 2πi 0 2. Let f : C ! C be an entire function. Let a 2 R be an arbitrary constant. (a) Show that if Re f(z) ≤ a for all z 2 C, then f is constant. (b) Show that if Re f(z) ≥ a for all z 2 C, then f is constant. 2 2 (c) Show that if [Re f(z)] ≤ [Im f(z)] for all z 2 C, then f is constant. 2 2 (d) Show that if [Re f(z)] ≥ [Im f(z)] for all z 2 C, then f is constant. (e) Suppose h is another entire functions and suppose there exists an a 2 R, a > 0, such that Re f(z) ≤ a Re h(z) for all z 2 C. Show that there exist α; β 2 C such that f(z) = αh(z) + β for all z 2 C. Date: November 14, 2009 (Version 1.0). 1 [Hint: if f and g are both entire, then so are f ◦ g and g ◦ f; find an appropriate g so that you may apply Liouville's theorem.] x Solution. Note that e is a monotone increasing function on R. • For (a), we choose g(z) = ez and note that jef(z)j = jeRe f(z)ei Im f(z)j = eRe f(z) ≤ ea. • For (c), we choose g(z) = ez2 and note that jef(z)2 j = je[Re f(z)]2−[Im f(z)]2 e2i Re f(z) Im f(z)j = e[Re f(z)]2−[Im f(z)]2 ≤ e0 = 1. Applying Liouville's theorem then implies that ef(z); ef(z)2 are constant functions. To show that f must also be a constant function, we differentiate ef(z) to get 0 = (ef(z))0 = f 0(z)ef(z): Since ef(z) is never zero, we get f 0(z) = 0 and so f must be a constant function in (a). The same argument shows for (c) that f 2 must be a constant function and therefore f must be a constant function (since it is continuous). (b) could be deduced from (a) and (d) could be deduced from from (c) by applying (a) and (c) to −f. For (e), we just apply (a) to the entire function f − ah, which by assumption satisfies Re f(z) − a Re h(z) ≤ 0 for all z 2 C. 3. Let f : C ! C be an entire function. × (a) Suppose there exists α; β 2 C such that α/β2 = R. Show that if f satisfies the following conditions f(z + α) = f(z); f(z + β) = f(z) for all z 2 C, then f is constant. Solution. Given any real number x 2 R, we will write [x] for the integral part of x and hxi for the fractional part of x. For example [−5:12] = −5 and h−5:12i = 0:12. Note that [x] 2 Z, hxi 2 [0; 1), and x = [x] + hxi for all x 2 R. The condition α/β2 = R implies that α; β span C as a real vector space of dimension 2. In other words, any z 2 C may be written as z = xα + yβ where x; y 2 R. Observe that the two conditions given may be applied recursively to obtain f(z) = f(xα + yβ) = f(αhxi + βhyi + α[x] + β[y]) = f(αhxi + βhyi): for any z = xα+yβ 2 C. Note that for any z = xα+yβ 2 C, αhxi+βhyi 2 [0; α)×[0; β) ⊆ [0; α] × [0; β], ie. the closed parallelogram bounded by the line segments from 0 to α and 0 to β and this is compact, and so supjf(z)j = sup jf(z)j ≤ max jf(z)j: z2C z2[0,α)×[0,β) z2[0,α]×[0,β] The last term is finite by the Extreme Value Theorem in Math 104 (since [0; α] × [0; β] is compact and f is analytic, therefore continuous) and so f is bounded. Liouville's theorem then implies that f is constant. (b) Suppose f(z) lim = 0: jzj!1 z Show that f is a constant function. Solution. Define g : C ! C by 8f(z) − f(0) < z 6= 0; g(z) := z − 0 :f 0(0) z = 0: 2 By Corollary 4.4, g is an entire function too. Now, f(z) lim jg(z)j = lim = 0: jzj!1 jzj!1 z Let " > 0. Then there exists R > 0 such that jg(z)j < " for all jzj ≥ R. In particular, jg(z)j < " for all z 2 @D(0;R). Applying maximum modulus theorem (or Corollary 4.15), we get max jg(z)j = max jg(z)j ≤ ": z2D(0;R) z2@D(0;R) Therefore jg(z)j ≤ " for all z 2 C. Since " is arbitrary, we conclude that g(z) = 0 for all z 2 C. Hence f(z) = f(0) for all z 2 C and so f is a constant function. (a) Find all entire functions f that satisfy 1 1 f 00 + f = 0 n n for all n 2 N. Solution. Note that if f is an entire function, then so is f 00. In particular, f 00 + f is continuous and so 1 1 f 00(0) + f(0) = lim f 00 + f = 0: n!1 n n 00 −1 Hence f + f is zero on a subset of C with limit points, namely, fn j n 2 Ng [ f0g and 00 thus by the uniqueness theorem, f + f ≡ 0 on the whole of C. Now since f is entire, its Taylor series expansion about 0 that converges everywhere in C, and is given by 1 X f (n)(0) f(z) = zn: n! n=0 Likewise for f 00, we have 1 X f (n+2)(0) f 00(z) = zn: n! n=0 Hence, for all z 2 C, 1 " # X f (n+2)(0) f (n)(0) f 00(z) + f(z) = + zn: n! n! n=0 00 (n+2) (n) Now since f + f ≡ 0, we must have f (0) = −f (0) for all n 2 N [ f0g, ie. f(0) = −f 00(0) = ··· = (−1)nf (2n)(0) = ··· f 0(0) = −f 000(0) = ··· = (−1)nf (2n+1)(0) = ··· : Hence 1 X f (n)(0) f(z) = zn n! n=0 1 1 X (−1)n X (−1)n = f(0) z2n + f 0(0) z2n+1 (2n)! (2n + 1)! n=0 n=0 = f(0) cos z + f 0(0) sin z: 3 Note that the `splitting' of the first power series into a sum of two power series is permissible because all three series have infinite radius of convergence. Hence an entire function that satisfies the given condition must be of the form f(z) = f(0) cos z + f 0(0) sin z: (b) Let n 2 N and n ≥ 2. Find all entire functions f that satisfy f(zn) = [f(z)]n for all z 2 C. Solution. By Theorem 4.3, f has a power series expansion 1 X m f(z) = amz m=0 with infinite radius of convergence. By the given condition n n a0 = f(0) = f (0) = a0 2pπi and so either a0 = 0 or a0 = e n−1 for some p 2 f1; : : : ; n − 1g. 2pπi Case I. Suppose a0 = e n−1 for some p 2 f1; : : : ; n − 1g and f is non-constant. Let k 2 N be the smallest positive number such ak 6= 0. Hence n kn f(z ) = 1 + akz + higher order terms and n k [f(z)] = 1 + nakz + higher order terms. n n Since f(z ) = [f(z)] , comparing coefficients tells us that nak = 0 and so ak = 0 | a 2pπi contradiction. In other words, if a0 = e n−1 for some p 2 f1; : : : ; n − 1g, then f must be a 2pπi constant function. Hence f(z) = a0 = e n−1 for all z 2 C. Case II. Suppose a0 = 0 and f is non-constant.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Property of the Derivative of an Entire Function
    A property of the derivative of an entire function Walter Bergweiler∗ and Alexandre Eremenko† July 21, 2011 Abstract We prove that the derivative of a non-linear entire function is un- bounded on the preimage of an unbounded set. MSC 2010: 30D30. Keywords: entire function, normal family. 1 Introduction and results The main result of this paper is the following theorem conjectured by Allen Weitsman (private communication): Theorem 1. Let f be a non-linear entire function and M an unbounded set in C. Then f ′(f −1(M)) is unbounded. We note that there exist entire functions f such that f ′(f −1(M)) is bounded for every bounded set M, for example, f(z)= ez or f(z) = cos z. Theorem 1 is a consequence of the following stronger result: Theorem 2. Let f be a transcendental entire function and ε > 0. Then there exists R> 0 such that for every w C satisfying w >R there exists ∈ | | z C with f(z)= w and f ′(z) w 1−ε. ∈ | | ≥ | | ∗Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Be 1508/7-1, and the ESF Net- working Programme HCAA. †Supported by NSF grant DMS-1067886. 1 The example f(z)= √z sin √z shows that that the exponent 1 ε in the − last inequality cannot be replaced by 1. The function f(z) = cos √z has the property that for every w C we have f ′(z) 0 as z , z f −1(w). ∈ → → ∞ ∈ We note that the Wiman–Valiron theory [20, 12, 4] says that there exists a set F [1, ) of finite logarithmic measure such that if ⊂ ∞ zr = r / F and f(zr) = max f(z) , | | ∈ | | |z|=r | | then ν(r,f) z ′ ν(r, f) f(z) f(zr) and f (z) f(z) ∼ zr ∼ r −1/2−δ for z zr rν(r, f) as r .
    [Show full text]
  • Applications of Entire Function Theory to the Spectral Synthesis of Diagonal Operators
    APPLICATIONS OF ENTIRE FUNCTION THEORY TO THE SPECTRAL SYNTHESIS OF DIAGONAL OPERATORS Kate Overmoyer A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2011 Committee: Steven M. Seubert, Advisor Kyoo Kim, Graduate Faculty Representative Kit C. Chan J. Gordon Wade ii ABSTRACT Steven M. Seubert, Advisor A diagonal operator acting on the space H(B(0;R)) of functions analytic on the disk B(0;R) where 0 < R ≤ 1 is defined to be any continuous linear map on H(B(0;R)) having the monomials zn as eigenvectors. In this dissertation, examples of diagonal operators D acting on the spaces H(B(0;R)) where 0 < R < 1, are constructed which fail to admit spectral synthesis; that is, which have invariant subspaces that are not spanned by collec- tions of eigenvectors. Examples include diagonal operators whose eigenvalues are the points fnae2πij=b : 0 ≤ j < bg lying on finitely many rays for suitably chosen a 2 (0; 1) and b 2 N, and more generally whose eigenvalues are the integer lattice points Z×iZ. Conditions for re- moving or perturbing countably many of the eigenvalues of a non-synthetic operator which yield another non-synthetic operator are also given. In addition, sufficient conditions are given for a diagonal operator on the space H(B(0;R)) of entire functions (for which R = 1) to admit spectral synthesis. iii This dissertation is dedicated to my family who believed in me even when I did not believe in myself.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Analysis Qual Sheet
    Complex Analysis Qual Sheet Robert Won \Tricks and traps. Basically all complex analysis qualifying exams are collections of tricks and traps." - Jim Agler 1 Useful facts 1 X zn 1. ez = n! n=0 1 X z2n+1 1 2. sin z = (−1)n = (eiz − e−iz) (2n + 1)! 2i n=0 1 X z2n 1 3. cos z = (−1)n = (eiz + e−iz) 2n! 2 n=0 1 4. If g is a branch of f −1 on G, then for a 2 G, g0(a) = f 0(g(a)) 5. jz ± aj2 = jzj2 ± 2Reaz + jaj2 6. If f has a pole of order m at z = a and g(z) = (z − a)mf(z), then 1 Res(f; a) = g(m−1)(a): (m − 1)! 7. The elementary factors are defined as z2 zp E (z) = (1 − z) exp z + + ··· + : p 2 p Note that elementary factors are entire and Ep(z=a) has a simple zero at z = a. 8. The factorization of sin is given by 1 Y z2 sin πz = πz 1 − : n2 n=1 9. If f(z) = (z − a)mg(z) where g(a) 6= 0, then f 0(z) m g0(z) = + : f(z) z − a g(z) 1 2 Tricks 1. If f(z) nonzero, try dividing by f(z). Otherwise, if the region is simply connected, try writing f(z) = eg(z). 2. Remember that jezj = eRez and argez = Imz. If you see a Rez anywhere, try manipulating to get ez. 3. On a similar note, for a branch of the log, log reiθ = log jrj + iθ.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpolation and Approximation by Entire Functions
    Interpolation and Approximation by Entire Functions Friedrich Littmann Abstract. In this note we study the connection between best ap- proximation and interpolation by entire functions on the real line. A general representation for entire interpolants is outlined. As an illustration, best upper and lower approximations from the class of functions of fixed exponential type to the Gaussian are constructed. §1. Approximation Background The Fourier transform of ϕ ∈ L1(R) is defined by Z ∞ −2πixt ϕb(t) = ϕ(x)e dx. −∞ This article considers the following problem: given a function f : R → R and a sequence of points {aj}j∈N from R (not necessarily distinct), find entire functions A and F such that F has its real zeros at the values aj and such that the equality f(x) − A(x) = F (x)H(x) (1) holds with a function H which is real-valued and of one sign on the real line. Classically, this is often done by defining A with aid of an interpola- tion series and then estimating the difference on the left-hand side of (1). Investigations by Holt and Vaaler [5], Li and Vaaler [7], and the author [8] suggest that a generalization of this approach is needed which allows for non-equally spaced node sets. The starting point is a relation between F and a function g given by Z ∞ 1 = F (x) extg(t)dt, (2) −∞ Conference Title 1 Editors pp. 1–6. Copyright Oc 2005 by Nashboro Press, Brentwood, TN. ISBN 0-0-9728482-x-x All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Complex Analysis
    Chapter 2 Complex Analysis In this part of the course we will study some basic complex analysis. This is an extremely useful and beautiful part of mathematics and forms the basis of many techniques employed in many branches of mathematics and physics. We will extend the notions of derivatives and integrals, familiar from calculus, to the case of complex functions of a complex variable. In so doing we will come across analytic functions, which form the centerpiece of this part of the course. In fact, to a large extent complex analysis is the study of analytic functions. After a brief review of complex numbers as points in the complex plane, we will ¯rst discuss analyticity and give plenty of examples of analytic functions. We will then discuss complex integration, culminating with the generalised Cauchy Integral Formula, and some of its applications. We then go on to discuss the power series representations of analytic functions and the residue calculus, which will allow us to compute many real integrals and in¯nite sums very easily via complex integration. 2.1 Analytic functions In this section we will study complex functions of a complex variable. We will see that di®erentiability of such a function is a non-trivial property, giving rise to the concept of an analytic function. We will then study many examples of analytic functions. In fact, the construction of analytic functions will form a basic leitmotif for this part of the course. 2.1.1 The complex plane We already discussed complex numbers briefly in Section 1.3.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Note for Math 220A Complex Analysis of One Variable
    Lecture Note for Math 220A Complex Analysis of One Variable Song-Ying Li University of California, Irvine Contents 1 Complex numbers and geometry 2 1.1 Complex number field . 2 1.2 Geometry of the complex numbers . 3 1.2.1 Euler's Formula . 3 1.3 Holomorphic linear factional maps . 6 1.3.1 Self-maps of unit circle and the unit disc. 6 1.3.2 Maps from line to circle and upper half plane to disc. 7 2 Smooth functions on domains in C 8 2.1 Notation and definitions . 8 2.2 Polynomial of degree n ...................... 9 2.3 Rules of differentiations . 11 3 Holomorphic, harmonic functions 14 3.1 Holomorphic functions and C-R equations . 14 3.2 Harmonic functions . 15 3.3 Translation formula for Laplacian . 17 4 Line integral and cohomology group 18 4.1 Line integrals . 18 4.2 Cohomology group . 19 4.3 Harmonic conjugate . 21 1 5 Complex line integrals 23 5.1 Definition and examples . 23 5.2 Green's theorem for complex line integral . 25 6 Complex differentiation 26 6.1 Definition of complex differentiation . 26 6.2 Properties of complex derivatives . 26 6.3 Complex anti-derivative . 27 7 Cauchy's theorem and Morera's theorem 31 7.1 Cauchy's theorems . 31 7.2 Morera's theorem . 33 8 Cauchy integral formula 34 8.1 Integral formula for C1 and holomorphic functions . 34 8.2 Examples of evaluating line integrals . 35 8.3 Cauchy integral for kth derivative f (k)(z) . 36 9 Application of the Cauchy integral formula 36 9.1 Mean value properties .
    [Show full text]
  • A New Entire Factorial Function
    A new entire factorial function Matthew D. Klimek Laboratory for Elementary Particle Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA Department of Physics, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea Abstract We introduce a new factorial function which agrees with the usual Euler gamma function at both the positive integers and at all half-integers, but which is also entire. We describe the basic features of this function. The canonical extension of the factorial to the complex plane is given by Euler's gamma function Γ(z). It is the only such extension that satisfies the recurrence relation zΓ(z) = Γ(z + 1) and is logarithmically convex for all positive real z [1, 2]. (For an alternative function theoretic characterization of Γ(z), see [3].) As a consequence of the recurrence relation, Γ(z) is a meromorphic function when continued onto − the complex plane. It has poles at all non-positive integer values of z 2 Z0 . However, dropping the two conditions above, there are infinitely many other extensions of the factorial that could be constructed. Perhaps the second best known factorial function after Euler's is that of Hadamard [4] which can be expressed as sin πz z z + 1 H(z) = Γ(z) 1 + − ≡ Γ(z)[1 + Q(z)] (1) 2π 2 2 where (z) is the digamma function d Γ0(z) (z) = log Γ(z) = : (2) dz Γ(z) The second term in brackets is given the name Q(z) for later convenience. We see that the Hadamard gamma is a certain multiplicative modification to the Euler gamma.
    [Show full text]
  • Math 372: Fall 2015: Solutions to Homework
    Math 372: Fall 2015: Solutions to Homework Steven Miller December 7, 2015 Abstract Below are detailed solutions to the homeworkproblemsfrom Math 372 Complex Analysis (Williams College, Fall 2015, Professor Steven J. Miller, [email protected]). The course homepage is http://www.williams.edu/Mathematics/sjmiller/public_html/372Fa15 and the textbook is Complex Analysis by Stein and Shakarchi (ISBN13: 978-0-691-11385-2). Note to students: it’s nice to include the statement of the problems, but I leave that up to you. I am only skimming the solutions. I will occasionally add some comments or mention alternate solutions. If you find an error in these notes, let me know for extra credit. Contents 1 Math 372: Homework #1: Yuzhong (Jeff) Meng and Liyang Zhang (2010) 3 1.1 Problems for HW#1: Due September 21, 2015 . ................ 3 1.2 SolutionsforHW#1: ............................... ........... 3 2 Math 372: Homework #2: Solutions by Nick Arnosti and Thomas Crawford (2010) 8 3 Math 372: Homework #3: Carlos Dominguez, Carson Eisenach, David Gold 12 4 Math 372: Homework #4: Due Friday, October 12, 2015: Pham, Jensen, Kolo˘glu 16 4.1 Chapter3,Exercise1 .............................. ............ 16 4.2 Chapter3,Exercise2 .............................. ............ 17 4.3 Chapter3,Exercise5 .............................. ............ 19 4.4 Chapter3Exercise15d ..... ..... ...... ..... ...... .. ............ 22 4.5 Chapter3Exercise17a ..... ..... ...... ..... ...... .. ............ 22 4.6 AdditionalProblem1 .............................. ............ 22 5 Math 372: Homework #5: Due Monday October 26: Pegado, Vu 24 6 Math 372: Homework #6: Kung, Lin, Waters 34 7 Math 372: Homework #7: Due Monday, November 9: Thompson, Schrock, Tosteson 42 7.1 Problems. ....................................... ......... 46 1 8 Math 372: Homework #8: Thompson, Schrock, Tosteson 47 8.1 Problems.
    [Show full text]
  • IV.3. Zeros of an Analytic Function 1 IV.3
    IV.3. Zeros of an Analytic Function 1 IV.3. Zeros of an Analytic Function Note. We now explore factoring series in a way analogous to factoring a poly- nomial. Recall that if p is a polynomial with a zero a of multiplicity m, then p(z)=(z − a)mt(z) for a polynomial t(z) such that t(a) =6 0. Definition. If f : G → C is analytic and a ∈ G satisfies f(a) = 0, then a is a zero of multiplicity m ≥ 1 if there is analytic g : G → C such that f(z)=(z − a)mg(z) where g(a) =6 0. Note. “The reader might be pleasantly surprised to know that after many years of studying Mathematics he is right now on the threshold of proving the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra.” (page 76) Definition. An entire function is a function analytic in the entire complex plane. Entire functions are sometimes called integral functions. Note. An area of study in complex analysis is entire function theory. A classical book in this area is Ralph Boas’ Entire Functions (Academic Press, 1954). Results in this are often concern factorization and rates of growth (see Conway’s Chapter XI). ∞ Note/Proposition IV.3.3. If f is an entire function then f(z) = a zn with X n n=0 infinite radius of convergence. IV.3. Zeros of an Analytic Function 2 Theorem IV.3.4. Liouville’s Theorem. If f is a bounded entire function then f is constant. Proof. Suppose |f(z)| ≤ M for all z ∈ C. By Cauchy’s Estimate (Corollary IV.2.14) with n = 1, |f 0(z)| ≤ M/R for any disk B(z; R).
    [Show full text]
  • A Laplace Transform Approach to Linear Equations with Infinitely Many
    A Laplace transform approach to linear equations with infinitely many derivatives and zeta-nonlocal field equations A. Ch´avez1∗, H. Prado2y, and E.G. Reyes3z 1Departamento de Matem´aticas,Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile 2;3 Departamento de Matem´aticay Ciencia de la Computaci´on, Universidad de Santiago de Chile Casilla 307 Correo 2, Santiago, Chile May 10, 2017 Abstract We study existence, uniqueness and regularity of solutions for linear equa- tions in infinitely many derivatives. We develop a natural framework based on Laplace transform as a correspondence between appropriate Lp and Hardy spaces: this point of view allows us to interpret rigorously operators of the form f(@t) where f is an analytic function such as (the analytic continua- tion of) the Riemann zeta function. We find the most general solution to the arXiv:1705.01525v2 [math-ph] 9 May 2017 equation f(@t)φ = J(t) ; t ≥ 0 ; in a convenient class of functions, we define and solve its corresponding initial value problem, and we state conditions under which the solution is of class Ck; k ≥ 0. More specifically, we prove that if some a priori information is specified, then the initial value problem is well-posed and it can be solved using ∗E-mail: [email protected] yE-mail: [email protected] zE-mail: [email protected] ; e g [email protected] 1 only a finite number of local initial data. Also, motivated by some intriguing work by Dragovich and Aref'eva-Volovich on cosmology, we solve explicitly field equations of the form ζ(@t + h)φ = J(t) ; t ≥ 0 ; in which ζ is the Riemann zeta function and h > 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Complex Integration: Cauchy Integral Theorem and Cauchy Integral Formulas
    4. Complex integration: Cauchy integral theorem and Cauchy integral formulas Definite integral of a complex-valued function of a real variable Consider a complex valued function f(t) of a real variable t: f(t)= u(t)+ iv(t), which is assumed to be a piecewise continuous function defined in the closed interval a t b. The integral of f(t) from t = a to ≤ ≤ t = b, is defined as b b b f(t) dt = u(t) dt + i v(t) dt. Za Za Za 1 Properties of a complex integral with real variable of integration 1. b b b Re f(t) dt = Re f(t) dt = u(t) dt. Za Za Za 2. b b b Im f(t) dt = Im f(t) dt = v(t) dt. Za Za Za 3. b b b [γ1f1(t)+ γ2f2(t)] dt = γ1 f1(t) dt + γ2 f2(t) dt, Za Za Za where γ1 and γ2 are any complex constants. 4. b b f(t) dt f(t) dt. Za ≤ Za | | 2 To prove (4), we consider b b b f(t) dt = e iφ f(t) dt = e iφf(t) dt, − − Za Za Za b b where φ = Arg f(t) dt . Since f(t) dt is real, we deduce that Za ! Za b b b f(t) dt = Re e iφf(t) dt = Re [e iφf(t)] dt − − Za Za Za b b iφ e− f(t) dt = f(t) dt. ≤ Za | | Za | | 3 Example Suppose α is real, show that e2απi 1 2π α . | − |≤ | | Solution Let f(t)= eiαt, α and t are real.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Analysis - November 15
    Complex Analysis - November 15 Topics: Infinite products, canonical products, genus, order, Hadamard’s The- orem, Reflection Principle, analytic continuation, branch point, harmonic func- tions. Problems: J07#2, J03#4, S95#5, S99#5 (note: prove this, don’t just state the Poisson Integral Formula!), J02#5, J02#1, J92#5, J93#2. ———————————————————————————————– Q∞ Infinite Product The product pj, pj ∈ C is defined to converge if P j=1 pj → 1 and log pj converges (sum only over terms for which pj 6= 0). The P value of the product is defined to be 0 if ∃pj = 0, and exp( log pj) otherwise. Using the fact that t/2 ≤ log(1+t) ≤ t, it is possible to show that for tj ≥ 0, Q P (1 + tj) < ∞ ⇔ tj < ∞. Weierstrass Product Theorem (Canonical Product) There exists an entire function with arbitrarily prescribed zeros zk and multiplicities nk provided that, in the case of infinitely many zeros, ak → ∞. Every entire function with these and no other zeros can be written in the form ∞ z z2 z3 zmk nk( + + +...+ m ) n g(z) Y z n zk 2z2 3z3 m z k f(z) = z 0 e (1 − ) k e k k k k , (1) zk k=1 where g(z) is entire, and each mk is large enough to guarantee convergence of the product. Genus The genus of an entire function is the smallest integer h such that f(z) can be represented in the form z z2 zh nk( + +...+ ) g(z) Y z n zk 2z2 hzh f(z) = e (1 − ) k e k k , zk k where g(z) is a polynomial of degree ≤ h.
    [Show full text]