DOCSLIB.ORG

Image Quality of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Optimization in Image Acquisition and Reconstruction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Image Quality of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Optimization in Image Acquisition and Reconstruction Image Quality of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Optimization in Image Acquisition and Reconstruction by Gang Wu A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Medical Biophysics University of Toronto c Copyright 2014 by Gang Wu Abstract Image Quality of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Optimization in Image Acquisition and Reconstruction Gang Wu Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Medical Biophysics University of Toronto 2014 Breast cancer continues to be the most frequently diagnosed cancer in Canadian women. Currently, mammography is the clinically accepted best modality for breast cancer detection and the regular use of screening has been shown to contribute to reduced mortality. However, mammography suffers from several drawbacks which limit its sensitivity and specificity. As a potential solution, digital breast to- mosynthesis (DBT) uses a limited number (typically 10{20) of low-dose x-ray projections to produce a three-dimensional tomographic representation of the breast. The reconstruction of DBT images is challenged by such incomplete sampling. The purpose of this thesis is to evaluate the effect of image acquisition parameters on image quality of DBT for various reconstruction techniques and to optimize these, with three specific goals: A) Develop a better power spectrum estimator for detectability calcu- lation as a task-based image quality index; B) Develop a paired-view algorithm for artifact removal in DBT reconstruction; and C) Increase dose efficiency in DBT by reducing random noise. A better power spectrum estimator was developed using a multitaper technique, which yields reduced bias and variance in estimation compared to the conventional moving average method. This gives us an improved detectability measurement with finer frequency steps. The paired-view scheme in DBT recon- struction provides better image quality than the commonly used sequential method. A simple ordering like the \side-to-side" method can achieve less artifact and higher image quality in reconstructed slices. The new denoising algorithm developed was applied to the projection views acquired in DBT before reconstruction. The random noise was markedly removed while the anatomic details were maintained. With the help of this artifact-removal technique used in reconstruction and the denoising method em- ployed on the projection views, the image quality of DBT is enhanced and lesions should be more readily detectable. ii Dedication I dedicate this thesis to my parents for their constant support and unconditional love. I love you dearly. iii Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following people who helped, encouraged and supported me throughout my Ph.D. degree: • My supervisor Dr. Martin Yaffe and members of my supervisory committee Dr. Anne Martel, Dr. Simon Graham and Dr. James Mainprize. Thanks for your guidance, patience and great help all these years; • Colleagues in Dr. Yaffe’s group, especially those who work on tomosynthesis, Gord Mawdsley, Aili Bloomquist, Sam Shen, Cindy Xinying Wang and Albert Tyson who give me valuable suggestions and spark new ideas in many discussions; • My fellow graduate students Melissa Hill and Olivier Alonzo-Proulx for their help, support and useful discussions; • All members of the Yaffe lab, past and present, who have been great colleagues and friends; • My appreciation also goes to many scholars and friends working in Sunnybrook, Dr. Sam Shen, Dr. Wen Shi, Dr. Peizhu Sun, and Dr. Jianhua Yin. Thank you for imparting wisdoms on me, about living, loving and learning; • Finally, I am grateful for my friends and family and I want to thank them for their continued love and support. iv Contents List of Tables viii List of Figures x Glossary xi Academic Curriculum Vitae 1 Peer Reviewed Publications . 1 Conference Proceedings . 1 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Breast Cancer and Mammography . 4 1.1.1 Breast Cancer . 4 1.1.2 Breast Tissue . 4 1.1.3 Strength and Limitation of Mammography . 5 1.2 Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) . 6 1.2.1 Tomosynthesis Geometry for Image Acquisition . 7 1.2.2 Reconstruction Techniques . 7 1.3 Image Quality . 8 1.3.1 Contrast . 9 1.3.2 Spatial Resolution . 9 1.3.3 Noise . 10 1.3.4 NEQ, DQE and Ideal Observer . 11 1.4 Hypothesis and Outline of the Thesis . 11 2 Spectral Analysis of Mammographic Images Using a Multitaper Method 13 2.1 Introduction . 13 2.2 Methods . 15 2.2.1 Noise-power spectrum (NPS) Estimation Technique . 15 2.2.2 Figures of Merit for Comparison . 19 2.2.3 Power Spectrum Applications . 19 2.3 Results . 21 2.3.1 Projection Image with Uniform Phantom . 21 2.3.2 QC Images from a Clinical System . 25 2.3.3 Projection Image with Anatomic Noise . 27 v 2.3.4 Clinical Images with Anatomic Noise . 27 2.4 Disscussion and Conclusions . 30 3 Constrained Paired-View Technique for Tomosynthesis Reconstruction 31 3.1 Introduction . 31 3.2 Materials and Methods . 32 3.2.1 Simulation of Breast Tomosynthesis System . 32 3.2.2 Incorporation of Background Structure . 33 3.2.3 Simulation of Microcalcification Array . 34 3.3 Reconstruction of Tomosynthesis . 35 3.3.1 Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (SART) . 35 3.3.2 Maximum Likelihood (ML) Algorithm . 36 3.3.3 Paired-view Normalization and Projection Sequences . 36 3.4 Figures of Merit (FOM) . 38 3.4.1 Contrast of Attenuation Coefficient . 38 3.4.2 SDNR . 38 3.4.3 Model Observer and Detectability Index . 39 3.4.4 Artifact Spread Function (ASF) . 40 3.5 Results . 40 3.5.1 Results of Phantom A with Uniform Background . 40 3.5.2 Results of Phantom B and C with Simulated Background . 43 3.5.3 Results of Microcalcification Array . 43 3.5.4 Results of Clinical Examples . 44 3.6 Discussion . 49 3.7 Conclusions . 49 4 Dose Reduction by Patch-based Denoising in Tomosynthesis Reconstruction 51 4.1 Introduction . 51 4.2 Methods . 52 4.2.1 Patch-based Denoising Algorithm . 52 4.2.2 Image Acquisition and Reconstruction . 53 4.3 Results . 53 4.3.1 Biopsy Phantom . 53 4.3.2 Clinical Mammograms . 54 4.3.3 Clinical DBT Exam, Projection Image . 55 4.3.4 Simulation of Uniform Phantoms . 57 4.3.5 Reconstructed Slices of Clinical DBT Exam . 57 4.4 Discussion and Conclusions . 58 5 Summary and Future Work 60 5.1 Summary . 60 5.2 Future Work . 60 5.3 Local Spectral Adaptive Multitaper Method (LSAMTM) . 61 5.3.1 Summary of Multitaper Method (MTM) . 62 vi 5.3.2 Choosing Number of Tapers Adaptively . 62 5.3.3 Bilateral Filtered LSAMTM . 63 5.3.4 Simulated X-ray Projections and Clinical QC Images . 63 5.3.5 Preliminary Results of LSAMTM . 63 5.4 Reconstruction by Blob-based Voxels . 67 5.4.1 Breast Volume Representation by Blobs . 68 5.4.2 Projection Matrix . 69 5.4.3 Fast Ray Tracing Algorithm . 69 5.4.4 Results of Reconstruction by Blob-based Voxels . 71 Bibliography 73 vii List of Tables 2.1 Alternative methods for spectrum estimation . 15 2.2 Comparison of WOAP and MB performance in power spectrum estimation . 22 2.3 Paired t-test of WOAP and MB estimation in Bias and Variance . 24 3.1 Sequence of projection views applied in reconstruction . 38 viii List of Figures 1.1 X-ray linear attenuation coefficients of fat and breast tissue . 5 1.2 Image acquisition geometry for tomosynthesis . 7 2.1 The effect of ROI size in the windowed overlapping NPS measurement method . 17 2.2 Flow chart of multitaper method . 18 2.3 A 2D projection view of a simulated breast phantom . 21 2.4 Comparison of NPS measurement in simulated images with coloured noise . 22 2.5 Comparison of the bias in NPS measurement by WOAP and multitaper methods . 23 2.6 Comparison of the variance in NPS measurement by WOAP and multitaper methods . 23 2.7 Comparison of NPS measurement in simulated images of coloured noise with peak . 24 2.8 Comparison of the bandwidth in NPS estimation by WOAP and MTM . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Breast Reconstruction Surgery for Mastectomy in Hospital Inpatient and Ambulatory Settings, 2009–2014
    HEALTHCARE COST AND Agency for Healthcare UTILIZATION PROJECT Research and Quality STATISTICAL BRIEF #228 October 2017 Highlights Breast Reconstruction Surgery for ■ From 2009 to 2014, in 22 Mastectomy in Hospital Inpatient and States, the population rate of Ambulatory Settings, 2009–2014 breast reconstruction for mastectomy increased by 62 Adela M. Miller, B.S., Claudia A. Steiner, M.D., M.P.H., percent, from 21.7 to 35.1 per Marguerite L. Barrett, M.S., Kathryn R. Fingar, Ph.D., M.P.H., 100,000 women aged 18 years and Anne Elixhauser, Ph.D. or older. ■ Increases occurred for all age Introduction groups, but disproportionately so for women aged 65 years After a mastectomy (surgical removal of the breast), a woman and older, those covered by faces a complex and emotional decision about whether to have Medicare, and those who were breast reconstruction or live without a breast or breasts. There uninsured. are usually three main considerations in the decision: medical, sexual, and physical. Medical considerations include concerns ■ In 2014, women who lived in that breast reconstruction surgery lengthens recovery time and rural areas had fewer increases the chance for infection and other postoperative reconstructions (29 per 100 complications. Sexual considerations involve the impact of the mastectomies) compared with mastectomy on future sexual encounters. Physical features urban-dwelling women (41 include how breasts may define femininity and sense of self.1 reconstructions per 100 mastectomies). Several previous studies have shown an increase in breast ■ Growth in breast reconstructive 2,3,4 reconstruction for mastectomy. One study used a 2007 surgery was primarily national surgical database, another study used 2008 claims-based attributable to the following data of women insured through large private employers, and a factors: third study used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) for 2005– 2011,5,6,7 part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project o Ambulatory surgeries (HCUP) increased more than 150 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • CT Image Reconstruction Basics
    CT Image Reconstruction Basics 1. Introduction CT perfusion imaging requires the reconstruction of a series of time-dependent volumetric datasets. The sequence of CT volumes measures the dynamics of contrast agent both in the vasculature and in the parenchyma. CT image reconstruction refers to the computational process of determining tomographic images from X-ray projection images of the irradiated patient. Image reconstruction is a compute-intensive task and one of the most crucial steps in the CT imaging process. As the basics of X-ray physics were detailed in Chapter 1, we assume that the result of the X-ray image formation is an attenuation image. Each individual pixel on the detector therefore represents a line integral, that is, the accumulation of all X-ray attenuation coefficients along the projection line. Here, the projection line is the connecting line of the X-ray focal spot with the center of the respective detector pixel. 2. From Line Integrals to Voxels In spite of the discrete nature of the projection images, most reconstruction theory uses a continuous framework, in which the reconstruction algorithms are derived mathematically. The problem of discrete sampling is then solved within the final formulation of the reconstruction algorithm. As the discrete sampling is a more technical issue, we will neglect it here for the ease of presentation and refer to the literature that details these steps [1]. Thus, we will remain in a continuous domain in this section. a. Radon Transform Figure 1: Parallel-beam geometry and the generation of a parallel-beam projection ( , ). For ease of understanding, we explain the approach in the 2D (x,y) plane.풑 The풔 휽 source- detector arrangement is rotating around the object (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Breast Reconstruction with Expanders and Implants
    Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline: Breast Reconstruction with Expanders and Implants INTRODUCTION Disclaimer Evidence-based guidelines are strategies for patient management, The American Cancer Society estimates that nearly 230,000 American developed to assist physicians in clinical decision making. This women were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in 2011.1 Many of guideline was developed through a comprehensive review of the these individuals will require mastectomy and total reconstruction of scientific literature and consideration of relevant clinical experience, the breast. The diagnosis and subsequent process can create signifi- and describes a range of generally acceptable approaches to diagnosis, cant confusion and distress for the affected persons and their families management, or prevention of specific diseases or conditions. This and, consequently, surgical treatment and reconstructive procedures guideline attempts to define principles of practice that should are of utmost importance in the breast cancer care continuum. In generally meet the needs of most patients in most circumstances. 2011, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons® (ASPS) reported an increase in the rate of breast reconstructions, citing nearly 100,000 However, this guideline should not be construed as a rule, nor procedures, of which the majority employed expanders/implants.2 should it be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care The 3% increase in reconstructions over the course of just one year or exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed at highlights the significance of maintaining patient safety and obtaining the appropriate results. It is anticipated that it will be optimizing surgical outcomes. necessary to approach some patients’ needs in different ways.
    [Show full text]
  • ASPS Clinical Practice Guideline Summary on Breast Reconstruction with Expanders and Implants
    CME ASPS Clinical Practice Guideline Summary on Breast Reconstruction with Expanders and Implants Amy Alderman, M.D., M.P.H. Learning Objectives: After reading this article, participants should be able to: Karol Gutowski, M.D. 1. Understand the evidence regarding the timing of expander/implant breast re- Amy Ahuja, M.P.H. construction in the setting of radiation therapy. 2. Discuss the implications of a Diedra Gray, M.P.H. patient’s risk factors for possible outcomes and complications of expander/implant Postmastectomy breast reconstruction. 3. Implement proper prophylactic antibiotic protocols. 4. Use Expander/Implant Breast the guidelines to improve their own clinical outcomes and reduce complications. Reconstruction Guideline Summary: In March of 2013, the Executive Committee of the American Society Work Group of Plastic Surgeons approved an evidence-based guideline on breast reconstruc- Arlington Heights, Ill. tion with expanders and implants, as developed by a guideline-specific work group commissioned by the society’s Health Policy Committee. The guideline addresses ten clinical questions: patient education, immediate versus delayed reconstruction, risk factors, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, antibiotic prophylaxis, acellular dermal matrix, monitoring for cancer recur- rence, and oncologic outcomes associated with implant-based reconstruction. The evidence indicates that patients undergoing mastectomy should be offered a preoperative referral to a plastic surgeon. Evidence varies regarding the as- sociation between postoperative complications and timing of postmastectomy expander/implant breast reconstruction. Evidence is limited regarding the opti- mal timing of expand/implant reconstruction in the setting of radiation therapy but suggests that irradiation to the expander or implant is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications.
    [Show full text]
  • Silicone-Filled Breast Implants
    Important Information for Women About Breast Reconstruction with INAMED® Silicone-Filled Breast Implants RECON Patient Labeling Rev 11/03/06/06 page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page GLOSSARY ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1. CONSIDERING SILICONE GEL-FILLED BREAST IMPLANT SURGERY ............................ 10 1.1 WHAT GIVES THE BREAST ITS SHAPE? ...................................................................... 11 1.2 WHAT IS A SILICONE GEL-FILLED BREAST IMPLANT? .............................................. 11 1.3 ARE SILICONE GEL-FILLED BREAST IMPLANTS RIGHT FOR YOU? ......................... 12 1.4 IMPORTANT FACTORS YOU SHOULD CONSIDER IN CHOOSING SILICONE GEL-FILLED BREAST IMPLANTS ................................................................. 12 2. BREAST IMPLANT COMPLICATIONS................................................................................... 14 2.1 WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL COMPLICATIONS? ......................................................... 14 2.2 WHAT ARE OTHER REPORTED CONDITIONS? ........................................................... 19 3. ALLERGAN* CORE STUDY RESULTS .................................................................................. 22 3.1 OVERVIEW OF ALLERGAN’S CORE STUDY................................................................. 22 3.2 WHAT WERE THE 4-YEAR FOLLOW-UP RATES? ........................................................ 22 3.3 WHAT WERE THE BENEFITS? ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Manipulation of Object-Based 3D
    THE RECONSTRUCTION AND MANIPULATION OF OBJECT-BASED 3D X-RAY IMAGES by Simant Prakoonwit This thesisis submittedin partial fulfilment of the requirementsfor the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph. D. ) and the Diploma of Imperial College (D. I. C) Departmentof Electricaland Electronic Engineering hnperial Collegeof Science,Technology and Medicine University of London May 1995 ýy4y. AKSTRAICT Computersand graphic peripherals have come to play a significant part in scientific visualisation.In medical applications, many non-invasivetechniques have beendevelopedfor visualising the inner entities of the human body. A major interest has arisen in representationof the entities by digital objects that can be manipulated and displayedusing methods developed in ComputerGraphics. A novel methodin 3D reconstructionis presentedusing the assumptionthat all the entities of interest can be representedas a set of discrete objects. An object is characterisedby its commoncharacteristic. Each object is reconstructedfrom the projections of its surface curvesin about 10 conventional2D X-ray images taken at suitableprojection angles.Yhe method automatically generates an optimumnumber of the object's surface points that are appropriately distributed Yhe method also determines the object's closed surface ftom these surface points. Each solid reconstructedobject is thenrepresented by a Boundary-representation(B-rep) scheme, which is compatiblewith any standarddisplay and manipulationtechnique, and can be manipulatedseparately. Experimentswere performed on both
    [Show full text]
  • Your Options a Guide to Reconstruction for Breast Cancer
    Your Options A Guide to Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Options In this booklet Introduction to Breast Reconstruction ................................................................ 3 How to Make a Decision .............................................................................. 4 UMHS Team .......................................................................................... 6 Reconstruction Options Implants ........................................................................................... 7 Natural Tissue and Implants ....................................................................... 10 Lat Dorsi (Latissimus Dorsi) Flap Natural Tissue Reconstruction .................................................................... 11 Abdomen • Pedicled TRAM (Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous) Flap • Free TRAM (Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous) Flap • Free Muscle-Sparing TRAM (Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous) Flap • Free DIEP (Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator) Flap • Free SIEA (Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery) Flap Alternative Donor Sites ........................................................................... 15 SGAP (Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator) Flap TUG (Transverse Upper Gracilis) Flap Additional Surgeries After Reconstruction ........................................................ 17 • Nipple Reconstruction • Breast Lift, Augmentation, Reduction Terms to Know .................................................................................... 19 “I’m a wife and mother and I
    [Show full text]
  • Breast Augmentation Surgery: Clinical Considerations
    REVIEW DEMETRIUS M. COOMBS, MD RITWIK GROVER, MD ALEXANDRE PRASSINOS, MD RAFFI GURUNLUOGLU, MD, PhD Department of Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Department of Plastic Surgery, Dermatology and Dermatology and Plastic Surgery Institute, Dermatology and Plastic Surgery Surgery, Department of Surgey, Plastic Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Profes- Cleveland Clinic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT sor, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH Breast augmentation surgery: Clinical considerations ABSTRACT t present, 300,000 US women undergo Abreast augmentation surgery each year,1 Women receive breast implants for both aesthetic and making this the second most common aes- reconstructive reasons. This brief review discusses the thetic procedure in women (after liposuc- evolution of and complications related to breast implants, tion),2–4 and making it extremely likely that as well as key considerations with regard to aesthetic clinicians will encounter women who have and reconstructive surgery of the breast. breast implants. In addition, approximately 110,000 women undergo breast reconstruc- KEY POINTS tive surgery after mastectomy, of whom more Nearly 300,000 breast augmentation surgeries are per- than 88,000 (81%) receive implants (2016 5 formed annually, making this the second most common data). aesthetic procedure in US women (after liposuction). This review discusses the evolution of breast implants, their complications, and key considerations with regard to aesthetic and Today, silicone gel implants dominate the world market, reconstructive breast surgery, as the principles and in the United States, approximately 60% of implants are similar. contain silicone gel fi ller.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decision Guide to Breast Reconstruction
    THE DECISION GUIDE TO BREAST RECONSTRUCTION Breast reconstruction is the process of making a new breast after mastectomy (removal of the breast) for breast cancer treatment or prevention (“therapeutic” or “prophylactic” mastectomies). This web site contains information to assist you in making choices related to breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Our goal is to give you understandable, up-to-date facts about reconstructive options. We hope this site answers many of your questions, lets you know what to expect, and helps you make a decision that you feel good about. How to Use This Program This guide can be used in a variety of ways. If you are planning to consult your health care provider about breast reconstruction, we recommend that you spend some time reviewing this information before your provider visit. The basic knowledge included in this guide will help you partner with your surgeon to choose reconstruction options which are right for you. Following your consultation, the web site may assist in clarifying issues raised during your visit. Remember — you and your surgeon are a team, working together to make treatment decisions which fit your values, priorities and lifestyle. The Reconstruction Decision When you lose a breast to cancer, it is comforting to think you can replace it and look and feel almost normal again. However, treating the cancer and getting back to a healthy life should always be your first concerns. If you are able to have breast reconstruction, make your decision about whether to have reconstruction, when to have reconstruction, and what kind of reconstruction to have based on what is best for you.
    [Show full text]
  • Cone-Beam Reconstruction Using Filtered Backprojection
    Link¨oping Studies in Science and Technology Dissertation No. 672 Cone-Beam Reconstruction Using Filtered Backprojection Henrik Turbell Department of Electrical Engineering Link¨opings universitet, SE-581 83 Link¨oping, Sweden Link¨oping, February 2001 ISBN 91-7219-919-9 ISSN 0345-7524 PrintedinSwedenbyUniTryck,Link¨oping 2001 To my parents Abstract The art of medical computed tomography is constantly evolving and the last years have seen new ground breaking systems with multi-row detectors. These tomo- graphs are able to increase both scanning speed and image quality compared to the single-row systems more commonly found in hospitals today. This thesis deals with three-dimensional image reconstruction algorithms to be used in future gen- erations of tomographs with even more detector rows than found in current multi- row systems. The first practical algorithm for three-dimensional reconstruction from cone- beam projections acquired from a circular source trajectory is the FDK method. We present a novel version of this algorithm that produces images of higher quality. We also formulate a version of the FDK method that performs the backprojection in O(N 3 log N) steps instead of the O(N 4) steps traditionally required. An efficient way to acquire volumetric patient data is to use a helical source trajectory together with a multi-row detector. We present an overview of existing reconstruction algorithms for this geometry. We also present a new family of algo- rithms, the PI methods, which seem to surpass other proposals in simplicity while delivering images of high quality. The detector used in the PI methods is limited to a window that exactly fits the cylindrical section between two consecutive turns of the helical source path.
    [Show full text]
  • Iterative Reconstruction of Cone-Beam Micro-CT Data
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2006 Iterative Reconstruction of Cone-Beam Micro-CT Data Thomas Matthew Benson University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Computer Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Benson, Thomas Matthew, "Iterative Reconstruction of Cone-Beam Micro-CT Data. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2006. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1640 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Thomas Matthew Benson entitled "Iterative Reconstruction of Cone-Beam Micro-CT Data." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Computer Science. Jens Gregor, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Michael Berry, Charles Collins, Michael Thomason, Jonathan Wall Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Thomas Matthew Benson entitled “Iter- ative Reconstruction of Cone-Beam Micro-CT Data”. I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in par- tial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Computer Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Breast Reconstruction Or Prosthesis After Mastectomy
    BREAST RECONSTRUCTION OR PROSTHESIS AFTER MASTECTOMY Breast reconstruction Breast reconstruction can help restore the look of the breast after a mastectomy. It can be done at the same time as the mastectomy (immediate) or later (delayed). The timing depends on: • A physical exam by the plastic surgeon • Surgical risk factors (such as smoking and being overweight) – Women who smoke or are overweight have a higher risk of problems with surgery. Sometimes, waiting to have reconstruction until after you quit smoking or lose weight may lower these risks • Treatments you will need after surgery Types of breast reconstruction Breast implant Breast reconstruction can be done with: associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma • Breast implants (BIA-ALCL) • Tissue flaps (using skin, fat and sometimes, muscle from your body) BIA-ALCL is a rare • A combination of both cancer of the cells of There’s no one best reconstruction method. There are pros and cons to each. Breast the immune system in women with breast implants require less invasive surgery than using your own body tissues, but the results may implants. not look and feel as natural. • The FDA is studying Your breast cancer treatment, your body and your lifestyle will affect your options. Talk the link between with your doctors about what type of reconstruction is right for you. breast implants and a slight increase in risk Breast Implants of BIA-ALCL. There are 2 basic types of breast implants: • The risk of BIA-ALCL saline and silicone. Implants come in appears to be linked to textured breast different shapes to match the look of the implants rather than natural breast.
    [Show full text]