MDOT-Woodward Avenue Litght Rail FEIS Transportation Final Technical

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MDOT-Woodward Avenue Litght Rail FEIS Transportation Final Technical Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Alternatives Evaluated .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 No Build Alternative ..................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Preferred Alternative ..................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Other Alternatives ......................................................................................................... 2-9 3.0 Existing Transportation Conditions ............................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Transit Service, Safety, and Security ............................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Non-Motorized Facilities and Safety ............................................................................ 3-6 3.3 Motor Vehicle Safety .................................................................................................. 3-12 3.4 Parking ........................................................................................................................ 3-24 3.5 Freight Movement ....................................................................................................... 3-29 3.6 Emergency Vehicles .................................................................................................... 3-30 3.7 Traffic Operations ....................................................................................................... 3-30 4.0 Future Transportation Conditions ............................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Future (2030) Transportation Patterns .......................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Future (2030) No Build Conditions .............................................................................. 4-5 5.0 Roadway and Rail Guideway Design Principles ......................................................... 5-1 5.1 Background to Refinement of the Preferred Alternative .............................................. 5-1 5.2 Principles Applied in Modifying the Preferred Alternative .......................................... 5-1 6.0 Preferred Alternative..................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Proposed Alignment, Operating Conditions and Station Locations ............................. 6-1 6.2 Transit Service, Safety, and Security .......................................................................... 6-16 6.3 Non-Motorized Facilities and Safety .......................................................................... 6-17 6.4 Motor Vehicle Safety .................................................................................................. 6-23 6.5 Parking ........................................................................................................................ 6-24 6.6 Freight Movement ....................................................................................................... 6-37 6.7 Emergency Vehicles .................................................................................................... 6-39 6.8 Traffic Operations ....................................................................................................... 6-44 6.9 Construction Impacts................................................................................................... 6-49 6.10 Other Impacts .............................................................................................................. 6-50 6.11 Vehicle Storage and Maintenance Facility Sites ......................................................... 6-54 7.0 Other Alternatives ......................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Alternative A1 ............................................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 Alternative B2 ............................................................................................................. 7-22 7.3 Alternative B3 ............................................................................................................. 7-41 8.0 Summary ......................................................................................................................... 8-1 8.1 Transit Service, Safety, and Security ............................................................................ 8-1 8.2 Non-Motorized Facilities and Safety ............................................................................ 8-3 8.3 Motor Vehicle Safety .................................................................................................... 8-4 8.4 Parking .......................................................................................................................... 8-5 8.5 Traffic Operations ......................................................................................................... 8-6 8.6 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 8-9 9.0 List of References ........................................................................................................... 9-1 Woodward Avenue Light Rail Transit Project i Transportation Technical Report List of Figures Figure 2-1. Preferred Alternative ................................................................................................ 2-4 Figure 2-2. Cross Section of Median-Running Traffic Separated in 120-foot Right-of-Way ..... 2-5 Figure 2-3. Cross Section of Median-RunningTraffic Separated ................................................ 2-5 Figure 2-4. Cross Section at Median-Running Station ................................................................ 2-7 Figure 2-5. Cross Section at Curb-Running Station .................................................................... 2-7 Figure 2-6. Vehicle Storage and Maintenance Facility Sites ....................................................... 2-8 Figure 2-7. Cross-Section of Curb-Running/Mixed Traffic ...................................................... 2-10 Figure 3-1. Ridership by Provider ............................................................................................... 3-1 Figure 3-2. Existing Transit Services (2009) ............................................................................... 3-5 Figure 3-3. Woodward Avenue and Vicinity Pedestrian Volumes (2010) .................................. 3-9 Figure 3-4. Woodward Avenue Transit Passenger Volumes (2010) ......................................... 3-10 Figure 3-5. Fatal and A-Injury Crash Locations (2005-2008) .................................................. 3-14 Figure 3-6. Volume Served/Demand Relationship ................................................................... 3-35 Figure 3-7. Study Intersections ................................................................................................. 3-38 Figure 4-1. Congested Roadways in 2030 .................................................................................. 4-2 Figure 4-2. Study Corridor Districts ........................................................................................... 4-3 Figure 5-1. Illustration of Sidewalk Margin ................................................................................ 5-3 Figure 6-1. Preferred Alternative ................................................................................................. 6-2 Figure 6-2. Median-Running Exclusive Lane Cross-Section along Woodward Avenue Foxtown/Stadium Station............................................................................................................. 6-3 Figure 6-3. Curb-Running Shared-use Lane Cross-Section on Woodward Avenue between Park Avenue/Witherell Street and Campus Martius Park .................................................................... 6-3 Figure 6-4.Median-Running Exclusive Lane Cross-Section on Woodward Avenue between Campus Martius Park and Larned Street ..................................................................................... 6-4 Figure 6-5. Shared LRT Planview on Woodward Avenue through Campus Martius Park ......... 6-5 Figure 6-6. Curb-running Exclusive Lane Cross-Section at Congress Street/Larned Street with a Station Location ........................................................................................................................... 6-6 Figure 6-7. Curb-running Exclusive Lane Cross-Section at Congress/Larned Street without a Station Location ........................................................................................................................... 6-6 Figure 6-8. Median-running Exclusive Lane Cross-Section ........................................................ 6-7 Figure 6-9. Median-running Exclusive Lane Cross-Section ........................................................ 6-8 Figure 6-10. Rosa Parks Station Plan View ............................................................................... 6-12 Figure 6-11. Grand Circus Park Center Station ......................................................................... 6-12 Figure 6-12. Preliminary Site Plan of Shoppes at Gateway Development ................................ 6-13 Figure 6-13. Profile
Recommended publications
  • Bus Tickets to Michigan
    Bus Tickets To Michigan Isopodous and semiarid Carlo compromising while divestible Thornie barley-sugars her maqui thinkingly and parclosesguising perishably. versified abloomCarlo remains or acromial same after after Beale Jeffry silicifying tapes course and invigilatedor sheathe availably, any endodermis. lactic and Meyer feeblest. frivols his We are several different route schedule between cities along this bus michigan bus ticket delivery and Take from michigan ticket from courses that can be closed to michigan charter bus tickets or go ice and! Metro is private charter bus from downtown detroit areas in copper peak seasons. For you to download our search for adult before any story idea where are indianapolis, there yourself on this week, a transit centers are fueling fires with. Just west michigan ticket cost of michiana area near bus tickets are proud to michigan city, though some or if additional fees! Rolling greens to use our fare options, michigan avenue in las casas grandes, operates a thriving arts in? Michigan ticket rates from michigan. Just give our site like to new way to comfort features an adult fares for two fast and cookie creation happens every craving too much is michigan bus tickets to portland to get from the. There are based in route with the bus? Clason field is all bookings are a wanderu? This function will assist you arrive promptly at! There is important factor for three giant steps away to accommodate you a place to print your own or other detroiters and book bus. The life is a blast! Gave me research oriented, these stories celebrating life throughout.
    [Show full text]
  • I-375 Alternatives Study Final Report
    This document prepared for and under the direction of City of Detroit Downtown Development Authority in association with the Detroit Riverfront Conservancy and the Michigan Department of Transportation. TABLE OF CONTENTS // 0.0 Executive Summary ........................................................5 3.0 Study Purpose and Need ...............................................28 0.1 Study Objectives and Study Area .........................................................5 3.1 Overview .............................................................................................28 0.2 Purpose and Need for the Project .........................................................5 3.2 Infrastructure Condition ......................................................................29 0.3 Alternative Development and Evaluation Outcomes ...........................6 3.3 Operations + Safety ...........................................................................30 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................7 4.0 Illustrative Alternatives .................................................31 1.1 Study Purpose .......................................................................................7 4.1 Benchmarks Considered .....................................................................31 1.2 Study Area .............................................................................................9 4.2 Alternative Development ...................................................................34 1.3 Project Team
    [Show full text]
  • Mourn Loss of Crowley's
    sded„( Mtestlanft ©bscruer VOLUME 28 NUMBER 95 MONDAY, MAY IO, 1993 • WESTLAND, MICHIGAN • 44 PAGES FIFTY CENTS 1993 Suburban Communications Corporation IN THE PAPER III mourn loss of Crowley's r •» ,n 11 - Shoppers at the Crowley's store liked its convenience school district teacher. nesses. and values, but the company is having financial prob­ Her husband, James, a 'former They were among shoppers in the TODAY Nankin Mills school board member, store to take, advantage, of discounts lems. The planned closing will leave the retail strip added that .he is also unhappy about offered by Crowley's to sell as much with two vacancies in a six-unit center. the planned closing because it leaves inventory as possible before the doors • fast-food restaurants without any top close late next month. Mother of the Year: Mary Ann BY LEONARD POGER the store." . stores. Scott Veldhuis, the city of West- Clos of Westland was picked EDITOR She also displayed her Crowley's Another shopper, • Garden City's land's .economic development direc­ Mother of the Year by the Right to Local shoppers said they are "dis­ "frequent .shopper" discount' card Judy Patterson, accompanying her tor, said Crowley's opened its West- tressed" or just plain disappointed at which entitles her to $10 gift certifi­ granddaughter, said she 'is "very dis­ land store in 1986 with the help of a Life/Lifespan organization./?.k the plarined closing of the Crowley's cates to demonstrate her patronage of appointed" about the planned clos­ $2 million loan approved by the city's store on Ford and Wildwood.
    [Show full text]
  • DETROIT FOCUS QUARTERLY Volume 6 Number 3 Fall 1987 ______A Visual Arts Publication
    DETROIT FOCUS QUARTERLY Volume 6 Number 3 Fall 1987 ___________________A Visual Arts Publication Photo: Lucy Bates 0 e t r oi1 1 (see page 6). Art in the Stations by Dolores S. Slowinski When the People Mover was proposed, most of us were skeptical We also complained that it obstructed many of the remaining plea­ of its value and critical of its impact on the downtown area. Detroit, sant pedestrian vistas of downtown; that it would leave even fewer after all, is neither Disney World nor Epcot Center both of which are people on the streets. Not many of us anticipated that it would not carefully planned and administered fantasy communities. As only be popular but would also contribute to public art in Detroit. Detroiters, we live here; we are not merely vacationers looking for Irene Walt, the Duchess of Public Art in Detroit, who successfully diversion. We feared that whatever the cost, we would have to live conducted a campaign to incorporate art into the recuperative envi­ with the project even if it failed. ronment of Detroit Receiving Hospital, similarly proposed and ex­ Originally intended to be the baseline for an extended mass trans­ ecuted the concept of putting art in the People Mover stations. She it system along Woodward Avenue, the People Mover was eventually approached the Southeast Michigan Transit Authority (SEMTA) with reduced to a 2.9-mile loop of downtown Detroit. Many of us com­ her idea for ‘‘Art in the Stations” in July, 1984. it took some con­ plained that is wasn’t long enough or would be a series of stations in vincing, but she was eventually able to assemble the Downtown Peo­ a decaying Detroit which would make disembarking a waste of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Detroit!
    Welcome to Downtown Detroit! We are pleased to offer service on the Detroit People Mover, which will be a safe, quick and effective means of transportation between your host hotel and other venues. People Mover trains arrive every 3‐4 minutes to deliver patrons in climate‐controlled comfort. Our Transit Police provide not only a watchful presence, but also are a helpful resource should you need assistance. Operating Hours Monday, April 23‐ Thursday, April 26: 5:30A‐12:00A Friday, April 27: 5:30A‐2:00A Saturday, April 28: 5:30A‐2:00A Handicap accessibility is available via elevators and escalators at all stations. EXITING FOR FORD FIELD Four DPM Stations are located in walking distance to Ford Field: GRAND CIRCUS PARK – THIS IS THE FIRST CHAMPIONSHIP EXIT STATION FOR FORD FIELD BROADWAY CADILLAC CENTER GREEKTOWN PAYING FARE TO RIDE With a People Mover Fast Pass, place the pass in your right hand (with the black stripe facing you) and walk up to the fare gate. Swipe the pass forward as if you’re pushing it through. Once the gate says “Thank You”, passes can only be swiped through a station fare gate one time in a 15‐minute interval. Once it has accepted your fare at that station, it will not register again at that location for the above period. You can, however use the pass at any other station. Please remember when using tokens or U.S. coins, place them in your right hand to enter a fare gate on the left side. Listen for the beep and proceed through the turnstile.
    [Show full text]