<<

European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 2021; 25: 480-486 Association between and gallolyticus subsp. pasteuranus (former S. bovis) : clinical relevance and cues for microbiota science. Case report and review of the literature

A. AGNES1, A. BIONDI1, F. BELIA1, S. DI GIAMBENEDETTO2, G. ADDOLORATO1, M. ANTONELLI1, D. D’UGO1, R. PERSIANI1

1Department of Medical and Surgical Studies, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy 2Department of Laboratory and Infectious Disease Monitoring Studies, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

Abstract. – OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this Introduction paper is to contextualize the case of a patient with a synchronous diagnosis of colorectal can- In 2018, 1,849,518 new cases of colorectal cer (CRC) and endocarditis from S. gallolyticus cancer (CRC) were diagnosed globally. CRC rep- subsp. pasteuranus (former S. Bovis) within the current evidence, in order to determine if this resents the third most common cancer worldwide condition is indicative of an underlying CRC and and the 10.2% of all new cases of cancer. It is if it has any pathophysiologic significance. the second leading cause of cancer death in men PATIENTS AND METHODS: First, we describe and the third leading cause in women. As many the clinical case. Then, we review the literature fo- other neoplasms, due to the relative paucity of cused on the association between from the former S. Bovis group and CRC and on the pos- symptoms, it is difficult to diagnose it timely sible role of certain microbiota species on the oc- in patients that choose not to undergo a regular currence of CRC. At last, we discuss the implica- screening. Patients in stage IV at diagnosis are tions of this case considering the current evidence. at least 20%1. Hence, the importance of a timely RESULTS: There is a strong association be- diagnosis is essential to treat this disease while tween all the species of the former S. Bovis still in a curative stage. group and CRC. There is initial evidence that these may contribute to CRC by a ge- In previous years, a significant and unambig- nomic passenger mechanism. uous association between endocarditis caused by CONCLUSIONS: There are two main conclu- Streptococcus Bovis and colorectal adenoma and sions for this paper. The first one is that CRC carcinoma was described. After change in the neoplasms and endocarditis from all species of of the S. bovis group2, many reports the former S. bovis group have a strong asso- have described a selective association between a ciation. Any case of by these subspe- cies should prompt to a diagnostic completion specific subspecies S.( gallolyticus subsp. gallo- 3,4 by colonoscopy. The second one is that there lyticus) and CRC . However, there are contro- is an increased need for detailed reports/series versies in this field, as this association has been and original articles based on the evaluation of described even for other subtypes, as S. gallolyti- gut microbiota in patients with CRC, with the aim cus subsp. pasteuranus. to clarify if the association between bacteria and CRC is causative or sporadic and to better under- In recent years, the study of gut microbiota has stand the possible causative mechanism of spe- been under the spotlight. Nowadays, it appears cific bacteria in initiating and promoting CRC. clear that its balance is necessary for intestinal health maintenance. More and more associations Key Words: between specific bacteria and gut function are Colorectal cancer, Microbiota, Colorectal surgery, 5 Complications. emerging . A specific chapter of microbiota sci- ence is dedicated to the determination of its pos-

480 Corresponding Author: Alberto Biondi, MD; e-mail: [email protected] Association between CRC and S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteuranus (former S. bovis) endocarditis sible initiating role for CRC. The former S. bovis group has been involved in this investigation due to various reports of its detection in CRC cancer tissue and to the strong clinical association be- tween endocarditis or infection from this bacteria and CRC6-8. In this report, we describe the case of a 62-year- old male with a synchronous diagnosis of Strepto- gallolyticus subsp. pasteuranus endocarditis and of asymptomatic colorectal cancer. We review the pertinent literature, stressing the importance of this association from a clinical point of view. At last, we collocate this report in the debate on the role of microbiota in the development of CRC.

Case Report A sixty-two-year-old male in good general con- ditions presented to surgical attention in an out- patient clinic in February 2020. The patient had undergone a colonoscopy nine days before, after a positive fecal occult blood test, which he under- went for screening. The colonoscopy showed a circumferential thickening of the mucosa and the colic wall located in the median third of the as- cending colon (Figure 1). The pathologic results of the endoscopic biopsy documented the pres- ence of adenocarcinoma. He had hypertension and no history of cardiac valve disease. At the clinical evaluation, he had a good performance Figure 1. Images of the neoplasm at colonoscopy and CT. status. However, he complained of a remitting fever and asthenia since December 2019. The fe- ver had maximum peaks of 38.5°C but was under 2). For this reason, the patient also underwent an 38°C for most of the time, mostly occurring in the encephalic MRI that documented no clear sign evening and night hours, associated to nocturnal of embolism or ischemia. No neurological symp- sweating. He had multiple courses of antibiot- toms were present. The results of the blood cul- ic therapy with no benefit, except for a 10-day tures documented positivity for a Streptococcus course of Levofloxacin in January, that resulted in a temporary remission of the symptomatology. An infective disease evaluation was immediately planned. After evaluation, the patient underwent blood, sputum and fecal cultures and a trans- thoracic echocardiogram that showed a small vegetation on the anterior flap of the mitral valve associated with minimal mitral insufficiency and moderate aortic insufficiency. The CRP was 63.7 mg/dl, the hemoglobin 9.8 g/dl. After one day, the blood cultures tested positive for Streptococcus spp. and he was admitted to the infective disease ward. He started antibiotic therapy with Ceftri- axone. A transesophageal echocardiogram con- firmed the presence of a small floating vegetation attached to the anterior flap of the mitral valve (9×4 mm). Moreover, it documented a suspect small vegetation of the aortic valve (5×4) (Figure Figure 2. Echocardiographic image of the vegetation.

481 A. Agnes, A. Biondi, F. Belia, S. Di Giambenedetto, G. Addolorato, et al gallolyticus subsp. pasteuranus (spectrometric based on the detection of the ability of the identification) sensible to Ceftriaxone. During bacteria to ferment mannitol, on bile-esculin the stay, the fever completely subsided. To com- reaction, acidification of trehalose, hydrolysis of plete the staging, a thoraco-abdominal contrast starch and on sequence-based genomic analysis. CT scan was planned. The CT scan (data) docu- The new classification includes four subspecies mented a cT2-3NxM0 neoplasm of the ascending instead of the S. bovis group, namely, Strepto- colon (Figure 1). After 10 days from admission, coccus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus (biotype he repeated an echocardiogram that did not docu- I), Streptococcus infantarius subsp. infantarius ment any cardiac valve vegetation. After thirteen and Streptococcus infantarius subsp. coli (bio- days from admission, the blood cultures tested type II/1) and Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. negative. The CRP was 5.7 mg/dl. After fourteen pasteuranus (biotype II/2)2. After the subspe- days from admission, he was discharged in good cies identification, most of the reports on the as- clinical conditions. He underwent therapy with sociation between CRCs and endocarditis have Ceftriaxone for further 15 days and an echo- focused on Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. cardiographic control that resulted negative for gallolyticus. Indeed, this subspecies presents the cardiac valve vegetation. After 20 days from the strongest association with CRC. In 1989, Ruoff end of therapy and 55 days from the diagnosis, he et al11 identified an association between bacte- was admitted to the surgical ward. An Enhanced remia from Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol was gallolyticus and CRC (71% of patients). In 2005, applied for the perioperative management and Corredoira et al12 confirmed a similar pattern of synbiotics were administered in the perioperative association, identifying an association between period as well. A laparoscopic right hemicolecto- positive cultures for Streptococcus gallolyticus my was performed. Cultural exams of the tumor subsp. gallolyticus and CRC in 57% of cases (24 mucosa and the intraluminal feces were ordered. of 42 patients). These results were confirmed The postoperative stay was uneventful, and the in a 2011 systematic review and meta-analysis, patient was discharged on postoperative day 3. reporting an association between infection from No 30-days complications were detected. The Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus pathologic results on the specimen documented and CRC in 65% of cases. The risk of CRC in a poorly differentiated pT3N0 colic adenocarci- patients with Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. noma MLH1+, PPMS2+, MSH2+, MSH6+, and gallolyticus was significantly increased (odds ra- CDX2+. The cultural exam executed on the tu- tio 7.26, CI 95% 3.94-13.36)13. In some papers, a mor mucosa and the one conducted on the lumi- clinically relevant association for Streptococcus nal content feces nearby the tumor were compa- gallolyticus subsp. pasteuranus and rable, documenting the presence of Enterobacter but no association with CRC was described3,14. spp., spp. (faecalis and faecium), Other authors reported their data on the inci- Citrobacter Freundii, Bacteroides spp (fragilis dence of colorectal adenomas in patients with and ovatus), and innocuum. Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. pasteuranus as comparable to the one described in studies of Discussion and Review of the Literature screening in the general population15. Instead, in In this report, we describe the case of a another paper, a 31% association with colorectal 62-year-old male with a synchronous diagnosis neoplasms was detected for Streptococcus gal- of Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. pasteuranus lolyticus subsp. pasteuranus bacteremia8. For (former S. Bovis) endocarditis and asymptomatic this reason, some authors concluded that all colorectal cancer. endocarditis from the former S. Bovis should S. bovis is a gram-positive group D strepto- be investigated with colonoscopy8,16. In this re- coccus. The association between S. bovis en- gard, it should be noted there is controversy docarditis and CRC has been extensively de- on the methods used to identify subspecies of scribed. Indeed, in 1974, Hoppes et al9 described the former S. Bovis group, as most still rely on the presence of colonic adenomas or carcinomas biochemical/phenotypical-based assays, which in 64% of patients with S. Bovis endocarditis have showed some inconsistency. Instead, spec- and since then, many other reports have con- trometric and sequencing-based techniques have firmed this association8-11. In 2003, a new taxo- been addressed as more reliable. Although they nomic system for group D streptococci and for are not widely available and associated with in- the former S. Bovis species has been defined, creased costs3.

482 Association between CRC and S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteuranus (former S. bovis) endocarditis

Streptococci have a well-known tropism for tumor progression. Most CRCs have been iden- native valves, as endocarditis caused by the tified to originate from an adenoma-carcinoma Streptococcus spp. is one of the most frequent sequence. It consists of “driver” mutations af- causes of endocarditis17. S. gallolyticus subps. fecting the APC-kRAS-p53 pathway. In recent gallolyticus endocarditis has been reported in years, the association between gut bacteria and 94% of patients with bacteremia and in the 74% certain diseases have been contextualized in the of patients with S. gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus broader chapter of the gut microbiota science. isolates11,12. from S. Bovis The gut microbiota is defined as the totality of usually affects the left cardiac valves. Vegetations the microorganisms that reside in the gastro- are often small, and TEE is recommended as intestinal tract. It has been furtherly divided TTE may be non-diagnostic8. The mechanism of in a mucosal associated microbiota (MAM) hematogenous diffusion of this bacterium is still and a luminal microbiota (LM)24. Tjalsma et unclear. It has been suggested that colonic lesions al21, in 2012, theorized an association between may provide a specific niche for S. bovis/gallo- gut microbiota and cancer according to a driv- lyticus. The result is a tumor-associated silent er-passenger model. According to this model, infection that may enter blood circulation after driver bacteria that colonize colonic mucosa, the occurrence of tumor micro perforations4,18. such as , Escherichia co- Notably, the condition of asymptomatic S. bovis li or Bacteroides Fragilis, could initiate CRC carrier has been identified, while the majority of development causing persistent inflammation, endocarditis from S.Bovis has been reported in cell proliferation and genotoxicity. While pro- patients with an immunosuppressive condition moting carcinogenesis, driver-bacteria also have or a cardiac valve disease4,8. Moreover, a simul- an indirect role on tumor progression. They taneous occurrence of chronic liver disease and could create the appropriate environment for the colon cancer in patients with S. bovis/gallolyti- development of passenger-bacteria: secondary cus endocarditis/bacteremia has been reported colonizers that could suppress carcinogenesis in 3-57% of cases. This has been hypothesized (i.e., probiotic passenger bacteria) or promote it to be linked to an increased rate of bypass of the (pathogenic passenger bacteria). In this regard, hepatic reticulo-endothelial system thanks to the increased levels of Fusobacterium have been portal hypertension, favoring the access to sys- related with CRC stage, age of incidence and tu- temic circulation8,18,19. In our case, the patient was mor location25. The strong association between in good general conditions, with minimal-mild infection from S. Bovis and colonic adenomas valve insufficiency, no history of liver disease, and carcinomas have led to the speculation on and he had a locally advanced CRC with no ul- the possible oncogenic (driver or passenger) ceration or local ascessualization. role of this bacterium. Indeed, in 1977, Klein et The etiologic mechanism beyond the origin al26 reported the presence of S. bovis in the fecal of CRC is multifactorial and has yet to be fully cultures of 35 of 63 (56%) investigated patients understood. Dysbiosis has been strongly related with CRC. This report was confirmed in further to inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), which studies27,28 even though others did not confirm are a well-known high-risk condition for CRC20. this association29,30. In 2018, Rezasoltani et al6 Even the genomic changes initiating non-IBD documented the presence of S. Bovis in colorec- associated CRC have been postulated to occur tal adenomas, especially tubular, villous and in an “inflammatory” microenvironment21. Re- tubulovillous ones, while this presence was not cently, a molecular classification for CRC has documented in serrated polyps. Abdulamir et been proposed, including four subtypes (CSM al31, as well, identified a significantly increased 1-4), one of which (the mesenchymal subtype) rate of detectable S. gallolyticus DNA in CRC has been associated with an angiogenic, inflam- tissues compared with healthy colonic tissues matory, and immunosuppressive signature22,23. (49 vs. 8%). In light of these reports, it has been From a genetic/epigenetic point of view, the postulated that the presence of S. bovis, and in mutations leading to CRC development have particular S. gallolyticus subsp gallolyticus, may been classically distinguished in two catego- have a role in driving adenomas into an advanced ries. The “driver mutations”, that give to the stage through the promotion of proinflammatory mutated cells an effective advantage in the pathways4. Moreover, genomic passenger mech- neoplastic transformation, and the “passenger” anisms, intended as the advantage in adhering mutations, that do not have a direct effect on to CRC cells promoting their proliferation, have

483 A. Agnes, A. Biondi, F. Belia, S. Di Giambenedetto, G. Addolorato, et al actually been identified in specific strains of S. is causative or sporadic. There is an increased gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus32. However, in need for detailed reports/series and original ar- 2019, a Danish study17 investigated the presence ticles based on the evaluation of gut microbiota of any correlation between colorectal adeno- in patients with CRC, in order to increase the mas, CRC and the presence of S. gallolyticus or comprehension on this topic. In the future, if this Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus in field of research is adequately developed, many the paraffin-embedded tissues of 195 patients. advantages are expected for the management of Their quantitative PCR + 16s ribosomal RNA CRC from a preventive, diagnostic and therapeu- gene sequencing did not document its presence tic point of view. in any of the investigated samples. The difficulty in extracting DNA from gram-positive bacteria as S. gallolyticus and patients’ geographic loca- Conflict of Interest tion were discussed as a possible limitation of The Authors declare that they have no conflict of interests. this study due to its discordant results compared with the previous ones. In our study, the tissue and fecal cultures did not identify the presence Consent to Participate (include appropriate of S. gallolyiticus neither in the MAM nor in the statements) LM. It is unclear if the perioperative application The patient expressed its consent to participation in this of the ERAS protocol and of the administration study. of synbiotics may have contributed to this find- ing. Consent for Publication (include appropriate In our case, the late diagnosis of endocarditis statements) did not cause a worsening in patient’s status nor The patient expressed its consent to the publication of this a delay in diagnosis. The only significant delay study. due to the need for treatment of the endocarditis was the one between diagnosis and treatment (55 days). However, cases of S. Bovis endocarditis Availability of Data and Material treated and cured 6 years before the presenta- (data transparency) tion of a IV stage colonic cancer have also been Available by request. described, underlining a possibly problematic poor knowledge of this association between cli- nicians33. References

1) Global Cancer Observatory GLOBOCAN Online Conclusions Database - 2018. http://gco.iarc.fr/. Accessed 11 Dec 2019. There are two main conclusions for this report 2) Schlegel L, Grimont F, Ageron E, Grimont PAD, and review of the literature. The first and most Bouvet A. Reappraisal of the taxonomy of the Streptococcus bovis/ com- important one is the emerging need for all cli- plex and related species: description of Strepto- nicians to be aware of the strong association be- coccus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus subsp. nov., tween CRC neoplasms and endocarditis from the S. gallolyticus subsp. macedonicus subsp. nov. former S. bovis group, including S. gallolyticus and S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus subsp. subsp. gallolyticus and, more rarely, S. gallolyti- nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53: 631-645. cus subsp. pasteuranus and other subtypes. From 3) Dekker JP, Lau AF. An Update on the Strepto- coccus bovis Group: Classification, Identification, an epidemiologic point of view, reporting the sub- and Disease Associations. J Clin Microbiol 2016; species remains very important. However, from a 54: 1694-1699. clinical point of view, the detection of any case of 4) Boleij A, Tjalsma H. The itinerary of Streptococ- infection by these subspecies should prompt to a cus gallolyticus infection in patients with colon- diagnostic completion by colonoscopy to search ic malignant disease. Lancet Infect Dis 2013; 13: for asymptomatic colonic adenomas or CRC. 719-724. The second conclusion is a consideration for gut 5) Macchione IG, Lopetuso LR, Ianiro G, Napoli M, microbiota-based translational research. In the Gibiino G, Rizzatti G, Petito V, Gasbarrini A, Scal- daferri F. Akkermansia muciniphila: key player in literature, there is not enough evidence to deter- metabolic and gastrointestinal disorders. Eur Rev mine if the association between bacteria and CRC Med Pharmacol Sci 2019; 23: 8075-8083.

484 Association between CRC and S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteuranus (former S. bovis) endocarditis

6) Rezasoltani S, Asadzadeh Aghdaei H, Dabiri H, Falcó V, Holland DJ, Jones P, Klein JL, Ray- Akhavan Sepahi A, Modarressi MH, Nazemal- mond NJ, Read KM, Tripodi MF, Utili R, Wang A, hosseini Mojarad E. The association between fe- Woods CW, Cabell CH; International Collabora- cal microbiota and different types of colorectal tion on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study polyp as precursors of colorectal cancer. Microb (ICE-PCS) Investigators. Clinical presentation, Pathog 2018; 124: 244-249. etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in 7) Bundgaard-Nielsen C, Baandrup UT, Nielsen LP, the 21st century: the International Collaboration Sørensen S. The presence of bacteria varies be- on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study. Arch tween colorectal adenocarcinomas, precursor le- Intern Med 2009; 169: 463-473. sions and non-malignant tissue. BMC Cancer 18) Gupta A, Madani R, Mukhtar H. Streptococcus 2019; 29; 19: 399. bovis endocarditis, a silent sign for colonic tu- 8) Lazarovitch T, Shango M, Levine M, Brusovansky mour. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 164-171. R, Akins R, Hayakawa K, Lephart PR, Sobel JD, 19) Abdulamir AS, Hafidh RR, Abu Bakar F. The as- Kaye KS, Marchaim D. The relationship between sociation of Streptococcus bovis/gallolyticus with the new taxonomy of Streptococcus bovis and its colorectal tumors: the nature and the underly- clonality to colon cancer, endocarditis, and biliary ing mechanisms of its etiological role. J Exp Clin disease. Infection 2013; 41: 329-337. Cancer Res 2011; 30: 11. 9) Hoppes WL, Lerner PI. Nonenterococcal 20) Keller DS, Windsor A, Cohen R, Chand M. Col- group-D streptococcal endocarditis caused by orectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: Streptococcus bovis. Ann Intern Med 1974; 81: review of the evidence. Tech Coloproctol 2019; 588-593. 23: 3-13. 10) Olmos C, Vilacosta I, Sarriá C, López J, Ferrera 21) Tjalsma H, Boleij A, Marchesi JR, Dutilh BE. A C, Sáez C, Vivas D, Hernández M, Sánchez-En- bacterial driver-passenger model for colorectal rique C, García-Granja PE, Pérez-Cecilia E, Ma- cancer: beyond the usual suspects. Nat Rev Mi- roto L, San Román JA. Streptococcus bovis en- crobiol 2012; 10: 575-582. docarditis: update from a multicenter registry. Am Heart J 2016; 171: 7-13. 22) Guinney J, Dienstmann R, Wang X, de Reyniès A, Schlicker A, Soneson C, Marisa L, Roepman 11) Ruoff KL, Miller SI, Garner CV, Ferraro MJ, Cal- P, Nyamundanda G, Angelino P, Bot BM, Morris derwood SB. Bacteremia with Streptococcus bo- JS, Simon IM, Gerster S, Fessler E, De Sousa E vis and Streptococcus salivarius: clinical cor- Melo F, Missiaglia E, Ramay H, Barras D, Hom- relates of more accurate identification of isolates. icsko K, Maru D, Manyam GC, Broom B, Boige J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27: 305-308. V, Perez-Villamil B, Laderas T, Salazar R, Gray 12) Corredoira JC, Alonso MP, García JF, Casariego JW, Hanahan D, Tabernero J, Bernards R, Friend E, Coira A, Rodriguez A, Pita J, Louzao C, Pom- SH, Laurent-Puig P, Medema JP, Sadanandam A, bo B, López MJ, Varela J. Clinical characteristics Wessels L, Delorenzi M, Kopetz S, Vermeulen L, and significance of Streptococcus salivarius bac- Tejpar S. The consensus molecular subtypes of teremia and Streptococcus bovis bacteremia: a colorectal cancer. Nat Med. 2015; 21: 1350-1356. prospective 16-year study. Eur J Clin Microbiol In- 23) Fessler E, Medema JP. Colorectal cancer sub- fect Dis 2005; 24: 250-255. types: developmental origin and microenviron- 13) Boleij A, van Gelder MM, Swinkels DW, Tjalsma mental regulation. Trends Cancer 2016; 2: 505- H. Clinical Importance of Streptococcus gallolyt- 518. icus infection among colorectal cancer patients: 24) Van den Abbeele P, Van de Wiele T, Verstraete systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect W, Possemiers S. The host selects mucosal and Dis 2011; 53: 870-878. luminal associations of coevolved gut microor- 14) Cohen LF, Dunbar SA, Sirbasku DM, Clarridge JE ganisms: a novel concept. FEMS Microbiol Rev 3rd. Streptococcus bovis infection of the central 2011; 35: 681-704. nervous system: report of two cases and review. 25) Viljoen KS, Dakshinamurthy A, Goldberg P, Clin Infect Dis 1997; 25: 819-823. Blackburn JM. Quantitative profiling of colorec- 15) Sánchez JC, García-Garrote F, Coira A, tal cancer-associated bacteria reveals associa- López-Agreda H, Alonso-García MP. Colorectal tions between fusobacterium spp., enterotoxigen- neoplasia associated with Streptococcus gallolyt- ic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF) and clinicopatho- icus subspecies pasteurianus. Lancet Infect Dis logical features of colorectal cancer. PLoS One 2014; 14: 272-273. 2015; 10: e0119462. 16) Takamura N, Kenzaka T, Minami K, Matsumu- 26) Klein RS, Recco RA, Catalano MT, Edberg SC, ra M. Infective endocarditis caused by Strep- Casey JI, Steigbigel NH. Association of Strepto- tococcus gallolyticus subspecies pasteurianus coccus bovis with carcinoma of the colon. N Engl and colon cancer. BMJ Case Rep 2014; 2014: J Med 1977; 297: 800-802. bcr2013203476. 27) Al-Jashamy K, Murad A, Zeehaida M, Rohaini M, 17) Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, Miró JM, Fowl- Hasnan J. Prevalence of colorectal cancer asso- er VG Jr, Bayer AS, Karchmer AW, Olaison L, ciated with Streptococcus bovis among inflamma- Pappas PA, Moreillon P, Chambers ST, Chu VH, tory bowel and chronic dis-

485 A. Agnes, A. Biondi, F. Belia, S. Di Giambenedetto, G. Addolorato, et al

ease patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2010; 11: 31) Abdulamir AS, Hafidh RR, Bakar FA. Molecular 1765-1768. detection, quantification, and isolation of Strep- 28) Shanan S, Gumaa SA, Sandström G, Abd H. Sig- tococcus gallolyticus bacteria colonizing colorec- nificant association of Streptococcus bovis with tal tumors: inflammation-driven potential of car- malignant gastrointestinal diseases. Int J Micro- cinogenesis via IL-1, COX-2, and IL-8. Mol Can- biol 2011; 2011: 792019. cer 2010; 9: 249. 29) Dubrow R, Edberg S, Wikfors E, Callan D, Tron- 32) Kumar R, Herold JL, Taylor J, Xu J, Xu Y. Vari- cale F, Vender R, Brand M, Yapp R. Fecal car- ations among Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. riage of Streptococcus bovis and colorectal ade- gallolyticus strains in connection with colorectal nomas. Gastroenterology 1991; 101: 721-725. cancer. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 1514. 30) Potter MA, Cunliffe NA, Smith M, Miles RS, Fla- 33) Ferrari A, Botrugno I, Bombelli E, Dominioni T, pan AD, Dunlop MG. A prospective controlled Cavazzi E, Dionigi P. Colonoscopy is mandato- study of the association of Streptococcus bovis ry after Streptococcus bovis endocarditis: a les- with colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Pathol 1998; 51: son still not learned. Case report. World J Surg 473-474. Onc

486